Recruiting Better User Research Participants: UPA 2011
1. 23 June 2011 1 Recruiting Better User Research Participants Recruiting Better User Research Participants Principal of Research & Strategy Electronic Ink UPA 2011 23 June, 2011
11. Recruiting for Moderated Research. 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 10 Who should do the recruiting?
12. Who should do the recruiting? 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 11 Recruiting options You Your client A recruiting company
13. Recruiting for Moderated Research. 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 12 Doing the recruiting yourself
14. Doing the recruiting yourself 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 13 Advantages You know what youâre looking for. You have more control over who is recruited. You sound more human and less like a telemarketer. You save money.
15. Doing the recruiting yourself 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 14 Disadvantages Itâs difficult if you donât already have a list to work from. Itâs time consuming to find, contact, screen, and schedule. It may require a lot of cold calling.
16. Doing the recruiting yourself 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 15 Start with lists of potential participants - customer lists, membership lists, employee directories, etc.
17. Or gather participants from your website with a recruiting page or an online intercept. Doing the recruiting yourself 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 16
18. Or advertise or connect through social media and other sources. Doing the recruiting yourself 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 17
19. Recruiting for Moderated Research. 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 18 Having your client do the recruiting
20. Having your client do the recruiting 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 19 Advantages Clients have access to employee, customer, and member lists. Employees, customers, or members are more likely to volunteer. It saves you money and time.
21. Having your client do the recruiting 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 20 Disadvantages Clients may not be very good at recruiting. Clients may not possess the time and organizational skills required. Clients often pass on vague or incorrect information about the research.
22. Having your client do the recruiting 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 21 Provide your client with detailed instructions. Profile of who to recruit And who not to recruit
23. Having your client do the recruiting 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 22 Provide your client with detailed instructions. Schedule of sessions
24. Having your client do the recruiting 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 23 Provide your client with detailed instructions. Description of the study to give to participants
25. Having your client do the recruiting 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 24 Ensure they do it correctly. Delegate to someone with time and organizational skills. Monitor the recruited participants. Email the scheduled participants to introduce yourself and provide more details.
26. Recruiting for Moderated Research. 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 25 Using a recruiting company
27. Using a recruiting company 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 26 Advantages It saves you a lot of time and effort. Itâs a good option when you have no existing lists or other resources. With the right information, a good recruiting company can get the best participants.
28. Using a recruiting company 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 27 Disadvantages Itâs the most expensive recruiting option. You might get âprofessionalâ participants who are only in it for the money. With poor direction or a bad recruiting company, you can get the worst participants.
29. Using a recruiting company 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 28 Selecting a recruiting company Get referrals from other researchers. Get quotes from several recruiting companies - cost and confidence. Look for good communication. Cultivate several recruiting companies you can use regularly.
30. Using a recruiting company 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 29 A strong and clearly written screener is essential.
31. Using a recruiting company 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 30 Review the list of recruited participants. Ensure they fit what youâre looking for. Have your client review and approve the list also - CYA!
32. Recruiting for Moderated Research. 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 31 Deciding who will do the recruiting
33. Deciding who will do the recruiting 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 32 Do your own recruiting when: You have more time than money. You donât mind or are effective at cold calling. You can hire someone else to do the recruiting â intern, staff recruiter. You can use existing lists, recruit from your website, or advertise. You already have a connection with potential participants.
34. Deciding who will do the recruiting 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 33 Have your client do the recruiting when: Your client has detailed contact lists of employees, customers, or members. Your client already has a connection with potential participants. Your client has the time and coordination to do this effectively. Your client has successfully done recruiting in the past.
35. Deciding who will do the recruiting 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 34 Hire a recruiting company when: You have more money than time. You donât want to âcold callâ and screen participants. You donât have an easy way to find potential participants.
36. Recruiting for Moderated Research. 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 35 Writing a better screener
37. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 36 Keep people from hanging up on you Quickly get to the point. Youâre not selling anything. Youâre recruiting for a paid study.
38. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 37 Ask likely elimination questions first Only the most promising will go through all the questions.
39. Eliminate the usual suspects Eliminate recent participants. How would you answer this question if you wanted to get into the study? Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 38
40. Eliminate the usual suspects âProfessionalâ participants might lie. Recruiters should check their records before calling people. âA few years ago.â Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 39
41. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 40 Eliminate conflicts of interest Existing relationship with your client - employee, employee of a competitor, etc. Too much inside knowledge - web designer, developer, marketer, etc.
42. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 41 Avoid reading multiple choice answers The âcorrectâ answer is often obvious How would you answer this question if you wanted to get into the study?
43. Avoid reading multiple choice answers The âcorrectâ answer is often obvious âNone of theseâ Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 42
44. Ask open-ended questions instead of reading the answers How would you answer this question if you wanted to get into the study? Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 43
45. Ask open-ended questions instead of reading the answers Requires the recruiter to know which professions should terminate the screening Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 44
46. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 45 Donât make the elimination answers obvious How would you answer this question if you wanted to get into the study?
47. Donât make the elimination answers obvious â19 â 24â seems like a safe answer. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 46
48. Include multiple elimination answers. How would you answer this question if you wanted to get into the study? Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 47
49. Include multiple elimination answers Itâs not obvious which answers will get you eliminated. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 48
50. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 49 Avoid giving away what youâre looking for How would you answer this question if you wanted to get into the study?
51. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 50 Avoid giving away what youâre looking for âYesâ
52. Avoid giving away what youâre looking for Providing many choices obscures what youâre looking for How would you answer this question if you wanted to get into the study? Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 51
53. Avoid giving away what youâre looking for Providing many choices obscures what youâre looking for Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 52
54. Avoid giving away what youâre looking for Beware of those who choose everything to try to get into the study. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 53
55. Avoid giving away what youâre looking for Set a reasonable limit to eliminate fakers. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 54
56. Avoid giving away what youâre looking for Use open-ended questions to completely hide what youâre looking for. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 55
57. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 56 Ask questions that only qualified participants can answer
58. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 57 Ask questions that only qualified participants can answer
59. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 58 Require proof Require participants to provide proof of qualification. Provide a graceful exit, so that people donât have to be caught in a lie.
60. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 59 Recruit based on behavior and attitudes Most demographics arenât very important for small-scale research.
61. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 60 Recruit based on behavior and attitudes Screen for desired behaviors.
62. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 61 Recruit based on behavior and attitudes Negative attitudes towards your client or subject matter may disqualify people.
63. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 62 Recruit based on behavior and attitudes Screen for desired attitudes.
64. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 63 Recruit based on behavior and attitudes Interpret attitudes and behaviors based on answers. What do you think weâre looking for here?
65. Recruit based on behavior and attitudes Interpret attitudes and behaviors based on answers. People interested in Japanese cars Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 64
66. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 65 Donât ask questions that are difficult to answer Can you answer this question easily and accurately?
67. Donât ask questions that are difficult to answer Estimating the average number of hours per day is easier. Is this question easier to answer? Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 66
68. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 67 Donât use the screener to gather information Only include questions that screen participants. Save information gathering for a pre-study questionnaire.
69. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 68 Screen for computer, Web, and technology experience You may want to eliminate those with very low and very high experience.
70. Screen for computer, Web, and technology experience Self-assessments allow those who are truly uncomfortable with technology to excuse themselves from the study. But donât rely only on self-assessments. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 69
71. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 70 Screen for computer, Web, and technology experience Make your own assessment based on activities and behaviors.
72. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 71 Screen for eloquence Ask an open-ended question related to your topic to judge expressiveness.
73. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 72 Screen for eloquence But be careful not to eliminate qualified, quiet participants. âNormalâ people may not be as entertaining as âprofessionalâ participants. Recruit representative participants, not only those who speak in perfect sound bites.
74. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 73 Ensure that people are physically able to participate
75. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 74 Let people know what theyâll be doing Eliminate surprises and potential discomfort. Allow those who would be uncomfortable to back out.
76. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 75 Test your screener with a colleague Ask a colleague to try to fake his/her way through the screener. Recruiting company should point out problems in logic.
77. Writing a better screener 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 76 Get your client to approve the screener â CYA! Your client becomes responsible for the types of people recruited. Itâs difficult for them to complain later about the quality of the participants.
78. Recruiting for Moderated Research. 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 77 Minimize No-Shows
79. Minimize No-Shows 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 78 Locate your research conveniently. Where are your participants usually located during your session times? How easy is it to get to and find your location? Traffic? Public transportation? Parking? Is it more convenient to go to your participants or conduct remote sessions?
80. Minimize No-Shows 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 79 Schedule your research conveniently What are your ideal participants usually doing during your session times? Schedule a variety of session times. Whoâs most available for weekday research?
81. Minimize No-Shows 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 80 Avoid days and conditions that result in more no-shows Fridays Days before holidays Bad weather â snowstorms, rainstorms, etc.
82. Minimize No-Shows 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 81 Provide appropriate incentives. Make it worth their while to show up. Make it appropriate to the person and to the activity.
83. Minimize No-Shows 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 82 Contact participants to confirm Remind them to attend. Give directionsand parking / transportation information. A good way to receive early warning of no-shows and get a head start on recruiting replacements
84. Recruiting for Moderated Research. 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 83 Recruit Backup Participants
85. Recruit Backup Participants 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 84 Two approaches to backup participants Floaters Over-recruiting Floaters Over-recruiting
86. Recruit Backup Participants 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 85 Floaters Wait on standby to fill in for no-shows or inappropriate participants
87. Recruit Backup Participants 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 86 Floaters Wait on standby to fill in for no-shows or inappropriate participants
88. Recruit Backup Participants 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 87 Floaters Wait on standby to fill in for no-shows or inappropriate participants
89. Recruit Backup Participants 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 88 Over-recruiting Recruit several extra participants to use for no-shows Dismiss and pay those you donât need
90. Recruit Backup Participants 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 89 Over-recruiting Recruit several extra participants to use for no-shows Dismiss and pay those you donât need
91. Recruit Backup Participants 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 90 Over-recruiting Recruit several extra participants to use for no-shows Dismiss and pay those you donât need
92. Recruit Backup Participants 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 91 Use floaters when You want to be sure your observers always have a participant to observe You donât have time for an extra day of backup sessions You donât have money to pay for an extra day of sessions at a research facility
93. Recruit Backup Participants 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 92 Use over-recruiting when Itâs not important that your observers have a participant to watch for each session You have time and money for an extra day of backup sessions You want to save money on incentives Your participants donât want to wait around as floaters
95. Recruiting for Unmoderated, Remote Research 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 94 What is different about unmoderated, remote research? Large numbers of participants from anywhere in the world can participate Participants visit a website to complete the study on their own time Unmoderated tools automatically capture and present the data
96. Recruiting for Unmoderated, Remote Research 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 95 With a large number of potential participants, different methods are required to: Find Screen Contact And convince people to participate
97. Recruiting for Unmoderated, Remote Research 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 96 Three recruiting methods for unmoderated studies Emailing participants Online panel Online intercept
98. Recruiting for Unmoderated, Remote Research. 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 97 Emailing Potential Participants
100. Emailing Potential Participants 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 99 Gather a list of potential participants Use existing lists of customers, members, employees, etc. Recruit from your website Advertise
101. Emailing Potential Participants 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 100 Narrow the list of participants using existing information.
102. Emailing Potential Participants 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 101 Avoid adding screening questions to your study Each question adds to the length of the study, increasing abandonment.
103. Emailing Potential Participants 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 102 Determine how many people to email Determine the minimum number of participants for acceptable results. Tullis and Wood showed 30 - 50 is needed for online card sorting. [1] Assume a low response rate of 5% and email an appropriately larger population. [1] Tullis, Tom, and Larry Wood. âHow Many Users Are Enough for a Card-Sorting Study?â Proceedings UPA 2004, Minneapolis, MN, June 7â11, 2004. Retrieved March 7, 2011: http://home.comcast.net/~tomtullis/publications/UPA2004CardSorting.pdf
104. Emailing Potential Participants 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 103 Determine how many people to email Determine the maximum number of participants to accept. Avoid paying too much in incentives.
105. Emailing Potential Participants 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 104 Keep it short, briefly describe the study, and provide a link to the study
106. Emailing Potential Participants 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 105 Donât provide the study instructions in the email
107. Emailing Potential Participants 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 106 Highlight the incentives, both monetary and altruistic
108. Emailing Potential Participants 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 107 Provide appropriate incentives: individual incentives are small but add up.
109. Emailing Potential Participants 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 108 Provide appropriate incentives: entry into a drawing is often easier.
110. Emailing Potential Participants 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 109 Provide appropriate incentives: with equal appeal to everyone.
111. Emailing Potential Participants 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 110 Establish credibility with individual emails in a friendly, professional tone.
112. Emailing Potential Participants 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 111 Establish credibility by providing contact information.
113. Emailing Potential Participants 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 112 Establish credibility by sending the emails from a familiar person.
114. Emailing Potential Participants 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 113 Monitor participation and send reminders Monitor the number and type of people who have completed the study. If necessary, send reminder emails.
115. Recruiting for Unmoderated, Remote Research. 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 114 Using an Online Panel
116. Using an Online Panel 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 115 A panel is a database of people who have volunteered for surveys.
117. Using an Online Panel 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 116 Panels are provided by many recruiting and market research companies.
118. Using an Online Panel 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 117 Panel members are already pre-screened You provide the details of the people youâre looking for instead of a screener. The recruiter filters the database to find people matching those characteristics.
119. Using an Online Panel 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 118 Screening You can also add additional screening questions to the beginning of your study. Panel participants are motivated to take surveys, so you donât have to worry as much about extra questions leading to abandonment.
120. Using an Online Panel 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 119 You pay the panel company based on the number of âcompletes.â For each person who completes the study, you pay a recruiting fee and small incentive. Limit your costs by ending the study after a maximum number of participants.
121. Using an Online Panel 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 120 Quality of panel participants They want to participate in studies, and they want to be invited back. This motivates them to take the study seriously and provide thorough feedback.
122. Using an Online Panel 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 121 Quality of panel participants They are more likely to be âprofessionalâ participants, primarily in it for the money. They may not represent your typical user.
123. Recruiting for Unmoderated, Remote Research. 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 122 Using Online Intercepts
124. Using Online Intercepts 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 123 Online intercepts pop-up on websites to invite people to participate.
125. Using Online Intercepts 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 124 Those who accept are taken to a brief screening questionnaire.
134. Using prize drawings may be an easier, less expensive incentive.** Be careful of the legal issues surrounding contests and sweepstakes. Consult a lawyer if needed.
135. Recruiting for Unmoderated, Remote Research. 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 130 Choosing Between These Methods
144. Your site gets enough traffic or you can wait for enough responses to accumulate.
145.
146.
147. 23 June 2011 Recruiting Better User Research Participants 137 Jim Ross, Principal of Research & Strategy jross@electronicink.com
Editor's Notes
Failing to recruit participants or recruiting the wrong participants dooms everything that comes afterwards.
Have audience raise hands to each question. With âHad other recruiting problemsâ, ask them to mention or talk about other recruiting problems theyâve had.
Have audience raise hands to each question. With âHad other recruiting problemsâ, ask them to mention or talk about other recruiting problems theyâve had.
Have audience raise hands to each question. With âHad other recruiting problemsâ, ask them to mention or talk about other recruiting problems theyâve had.
Have audience raise hands to each question. With âHad other recruiting problemsâ, ask them to mention or talk about other recruiting problems theyâve had.
Have audience raise hands to each question. With âHad other recruiting problemsâ, ask them to mention or talk about other recruiting problems theyâve had.
Someone has to do the difficult job of finding, contacting, screening, and scheduling the participants. You can do it yourself, leave it up to your clients, or hire a recruiting company. There are advantages and disadvantages for each of these approaches.
Makes the most sense when you have easy access to a list of potential participants. When youâre recruiting your fellow employees or customers.
Makes the most sense when you have easy access to a list of potential participants. When youâre recruiting your fellow employees or customers.
Give you more credibility if you have a connection to these people - fellow employees, they are your customers, you are a member
People visiting your website are often the exact people you want to reach. The intercept leads to a screening questionnaire. You can either contact those volunteers immediately or they are added to a database of participants to contact later. This is far less expensive over time than using a recruiting company.Can continue to recruit participants over time
If your client has the relationship with employees, customers, members; have him/her do the recruiting to take advantage of that relationship.
Client not good at recruiting Theyâre not going to go through a complicated screenerToo many or too few participants of a particular type Recruiting inappropriate participants - Bob, the super user, because he knows the most about the systemYour client may not be good at scheduling participants in the desired timeframe, delaying the study or spreading it out over a longer time period.
Clients need guidance of who to recruit and who not to recruit. Otherwise they may not recruit the right people.Screeners are too complicated for them.
Schedule will constrain the sessions to a reasonable time frame.Otherwise the sessions may be too spread out over time.Emphasize the need to not schedule sessions back to back, leave enough time for breaks, meals, travel between locations, etc.
To prevent the client from passing on incorrect information, give them the email text to use.
Greater chance that youâll get people who lie to get into the study just to get the money. May not care about your research.
Some recruiting companies specialize in certain types of participantsGood to have several recruiting companies to use - otherwise you tend to scrape the bottom of the barrel if you use the same company all the time
Since youâre having someone else do the recruiting, a screener is essential.
The recruiting company should send you periodic updates on the participants are recruited.
The screener is one of the most important documents in a research project. Yet itâs often the one thatâs most taken for granted. Few books or schools detail how to write an effective screener, and as a result we often learn to write them through trial and error, rely on screeners created by the marketing department, or reuse screeners from previous projects without considering whether they are still appropriate.
Because people will assume youâre a telemarketer, you need to get right to the point and quickly establish that youâre not selling anything. Mentioning the money up front gets attention and keeps people on the phone.
More questions just add to the burden on the recruiter and the participants
Recruiting companies sometimes rely too heavily on their participant databases before calling âfreshâ participants. Many are great participants, but others volunteer a little too often. They may be supplementing their income as a professional research participantRecruiting companies should first use their database to screen out the participants they will call based on your criteria.
Recruiting companies sometimes rely too heavily on their participant databases before calling âfreshâ participants. Many are great participants, but others volunteer a little too often. They may be supplementing their income as a professional research participantRecruiting companies should first use their database to screen out the participants they will call based on your criteria.
If youâre using a recruiter, you have to rely on their ability to correctly judge the response and whether it fits these categories.
[Ask the audience to try to guess the answer that will get them into the study as a participant.]
If youâre using a recruiter, they have to have a good ability to interpret the personâs answer to know which to terminate
Sometimes you do need to ask multiple choice questions in which you read the choices to the person.
Because the middle three answers are so specific, they seem like safe choices to avoid being eliminated. Itâs obvious that â12 or lessâ and possibly â31 or moreâ are the cutoff points. The wording â12 or lessâ and â31 or moreâ implies that if you watch that little or that much TV, the recruiter doesnât even care about the exact number of hours, and youâll be eliminated.
Sure, Iâm âconsideringâ. Maybe, who knows. I guess I might need to buy a car, so I qualify.
âProfessionalâ participants play it safe by selecting all or most of the answers, knowing that thereâs one expected answer that will get them in the study.
Sure, you may eliminate some legitimate people, but youâll also eliminate cheaters. So be careful to make it a reasonable limit. A first time home buyer might reasonably buy many of these items.
Bring in their credit card from a particular bankBring in their iPadGraceful exit allows people to save face and screen themselves out instead of remaining with the lie and allowing themselves to be scheduled, knowing they wonât actually show up
Some clients want to get a distribution of demographics. That doesnât really matter, but if needed, put those questions at the end.Unless itâs a dating site, in many cases marital status doesnât matter.
Use personas or user profiles to determine the behaviors and attitudes
You donât want people with a strong bias against your client
You can interpret attitudes towards Japanese cars from the answers to this question.
You can interpret attitudes towards Japanese cars from the answers to this question.
Requires you to first think of the average hours per day and then multiply by days per week
Itâs easier to think of hours per day. No mental math required.
Information gathering only adds to the length of the screening process.
Ensure that the participants match the computer and web experience of your user groups. For example, in a usability test, you donât want to confuse interface problems with problems that new computer users face in general. Similarly, you often donât want to test with web developers or designers.
In self-assessments, some people will inflate their self-ratings, but this will help eliminate those that truly feel uncomfortable with computers.Eliminates people who show up and get nervous, âIâm not good with computers.âSelf-assessments are very subjective, and some people are reluctant to admit their inexperience.
Be specific. For example, I added âwithout assistanceâ to the following question after we recruited a woman who later said she used the Web to read her email by having her niece use the computer to read the email to her.
Itâs great to have eloquent participants who can easily think aloud and express their thoughts and opinions. It requires a lot of work to drag useful information out of quiet participants.Question should be related to your topic because people wonât always be talkative about subjects they are not interested in.
Real user groups include both expressive and quiet people. Including some of each type of participant will give you a more representative group and still give you enough interesting video clips.
These things sound so obvious, that you forget to mention them until a participant comes in who canât see the screen.I once had a woman who didnât bring her glasses and asked, âCanât you just read whatâs on the screen to me?â
Sure, we give them this information at the beginning of the session, but most people donât feel able to back out at that point.Many participants assume they will be part of a focus group, because that is what recruiting companies most commonly recruit for.
Reveals holes and logical inconsistenciesA good recruiting company reveals logic problems and when your screener is too strict and may result in no participants
There will always be no-shows, but there are steps you can take to make it more likely that your participants will show up for their sessions.
Obviously, the more convenient the location of your research, the more likely your participants will attend.
Conduct your research sessions at times convenient to the participants.
Tuesdays through Thursdays tend to be the best days for weekday research
Letâs face it, for most people itâs the money that encourages them keep their commitment to attend a research session. If you donât offer the right incentive for the effort involved, your no-show risk increases. For example, employees using poorly designed business systems are often grateful that someone is finally asking for their opinions. The chance to improve the application is incentive enough.
Recruit backup participants to replace no-shows and problem participants. Two approaches to securing backup participants are using floaters and over-recruiting.
To completely eliminate risk, each participant can be covered by a floater. However, this is very expensive. Instead, you can balance cost and risk by having each floater cover multiple sessions. This means you may run out of participants if you use the floater and then donât have a floater to cover another no-show participant, but thatâs the risk you take.
To completely eliminate risk, each participant can be covered by a floater. However, this is very expensive. Instead, you can balance cost and risk by having each floater cover multiple sessions. This means you may run out of participants if you use the floater and then donât have a floater to cover another no-show participant, but thatâs the risk you take.
To completely eliminate risk, each participant can be covered by a floater. However, this is very expensive. Instead, you can balance cost and risk by having each floater cover multiple sessions. This means you may run out of participants if you use the floater and then donât have a floater to cover another no-show participant, but thatâs the risk you take.
Phone screening is not economical or practical since people have to have a link to click to get to the study.
Emailing makes the most sense if you have a list of potential participants.
Emailing a link to your study is an effective method if you can easily identify and obtain email addresses of potential participants. However, emailing a large number of people can be time consuming.
For example, if you want 100 participants to complete the study, email 2,000 people (assuming a five-percent-response rate).
Some unmoderated tools allow you to end the study when it reaches a maximum number of participants. This can help you avoid paying too much in incentives.
Save the study instructions until people get into the study itself.
If there are non-monetary incentives, appeal to the benefits of participating. Your participation will help make the application you use everyday more efficient and better suited to your needs.
They add up and it can be time consuming to send checks to every participant.
It can be more enticing and less expensive.Itâs easier than having to send individual incentives to everyone.Beware of legal issues around contests and sweepstakes. Consult a lawyer.
For example, an Xbox appeals much more to some people than others, which will affect the types of people who enter.
- Although mass emails require less work, individual emails are more effective at establishing trust and are therefore less likely to be ignored.
Few people will contact you, but you show youâre putting your information out there for people to check you out. Youâre willing to share with them.
People are wary of clicking links in emails from people they donât know. Emails from a familiar person or organization seem more credibleOr name drop someone the person is familiar with and provide their contact information
This usually results in additional participants. If you still need more participants, email a new set of people that you havenât yet contacted.
If you think youâll have difficulty finding participants on your own, an online panel is a good option.
Provided by many recruiting companies
Provided by many recruiting companies
You donât need to provide a screener to a panel recruiter, as you would with a moderated study.
They are more tolerant of additional questions. They are more familiar with whatâs expected.
For example, if 1,000 people are invited, and 100 complete the study, you will only be charged for those 100 people. The panel company handles the incentives. You just pay one fee.
Recruiting is done automatically It can continue indefinitely
Donât make the screening too long though. That leads to abandonment.
Intercepts reach âreal usersâ who are already on the website for a reason with real goals and motivations
Less motivation to complete the study â People agree to them on a whim. No personal email from someone they know, not part of a panel and wanting to be invited for future studies
Discussion pointsWhat do you find are the most difficult aspects of recruiting?Are there other good methods to get participants?Other recruiting tips or advice?