In this paper we examine the information sharing practices of people living in cities amid armed conflict. We describe the volume and frequency of microblogging activity on Twitter from four cities afflicted by the Mexican Drug War, showing how citizens use social media to alert one another and to comment on the violence that plagues their commu-nities. We then investigate the emergence of civic media “curators,” individuals who act as “war correspondents” by aggregating and disseminating information to large num-bers of people on social media. We conclude by outlining the implications of our observations for the design of civic media systems in wartime.
8. “Fearing for their lives
and the safety of their
families, journalists are
adhering to a near-
complete news
blackout, under strict
orders of drug smuggling
organizations and their
enforcers, who dictate via
daily telephone
calls, emails and news
releases what can and
cannot be printed or
aired.”
9. “The news blackout
extends to government
officials. In Nuevo
Laredo, the mayor
mysteriously disappears
for days and refuses to
discuss drug violence.
The military general who
presides over the soldiers
patrolling the city does
not hold news
conferences, issue
statements or answer
questions from the
media.”
10. Internet Users1
17% (yr. 2000) 34% (yr. 2010)
34 million users
Social Media1
61% of Internet users
Twitter2
20% of SM users
5th largest country
1 Asociación Mexicana de Internet, 2011
2
Oxford Internet Institute, 2012
(cc) Lecates on Flickr
11. Weakened Increased
Institutions Violence
Social
Media
Adoption
Based on photo by Eneas on Flickr
12. Outline
1. Context
2. Information War
3. Tweeting the War
4. Citizen News Curators
5. Summary
24. Interviews
“Angela” “Claudia”
Followers: 25K Followers: 30K
Tweets: 35K Tweets: 60K
Hours/day: 15 Hours/day: “many”
Age: early 20‟s Age: ?
Photo: mr. toaster on Flickr Photo:CarbonNYC on Flickr
(in Spanish)
25. How did you get started with Twitter?
“Angela” “Claudia”
“It was through a “…by chance. I heard
friend. She said: on the radio about how
„you have to go to celebrities would
Twitter! it‟s so interact with their fans.”
cool!‟” (Joined in (Joined in mid 2009)
late 2009)
Photo: mr. toaster on Flickr Photo:CarbonNYC on Flickr
26. How would you describe your role?
“Angela” “Claudia”
“I‟m a journalist … “My role on Twitter is
It is as if I was a that of yet another
war citizen. [People] tell
correspondent, on me that I‟m like their
social networks, of „angel,‟ for looking
the war we are after them”
living in Mexico.”
Photo: mr. toaster on Flickr Photo:CarbonNYC on Flickr
27. Motivations
“Angela” “Claudia”
“I consider this as “…tweeting is an
a community altruistic
service, even community
though people service.”
might laugh about
it.”
Photo: mr. toaster on Flickr Photo:CarbonNYC on Flickr
28. What are your sources?
“Angela” “Claudia”
“Not all the information “Most of the
comes from Twitter. information is from los
There‟s a lot of people tuiteros, my followers.
who know what I do. In other cases, it‟s the
They have my number reporters on TV, local
and they call me… they news...”
are 100% citizens.”
Photo: mr. toaster on Flickr Photo:CarbonNYC on Flickr
29. Outline
1. Context
2. Information War
3. Tweeting the War
4. Citizen News Curators
5. Summary
30. Summary
• Violence, weak institutions, social
media adoption civic
engagement.
• Citizens form alert networks.
• Information ecosystem.
• Emergence curators ("war
correspondents“).
• Rich opportunities: surfacing latent
hyperlocal communities (CHI ‟13).
Notas do Editor
I’m __fr
I’m going to give you the context. CURATORS…. Characterize the nature of the phenomenon and then INTERVIEWSWe then investigate the emergence of civic media “curators,” individuals who act as “war correspondents” by aggregating and disseminating information to large num-bers of people on social media. We conclude by outlining the implications of our observations for the design of civic media systems in wartime. STUDY we examine the information sharing practices of people living in URBAN WARFARE. We describe the VOLUME and FREQ on SOC MEDIAfrom four cities afflicted by the Mexican Drug War, showing how citizens use social media to alert one another and to comment on the violence that plagues their commu-nities.
People debated on the role of social media as a platform for civic engagement during moments of crisis, acute events. Different latitudes. Different everyday acute events.
Numbers are contested. Some context. Mexican Drug War. Started by President Calderon in 2006. [add image source]
Shootings, grenade attacks and even car bombs. In some Mexican cities violence, crises are part of everyday life
Quite a bit of work on the field of Crisis Informatics. Typically when crises emerge, governments and the media are there to inform us. In the US the government has developed the role of Public Information Officers (PIOs) which has been documented by Palen and others.
MSM
Caveat #1: hard to find ground truth.
In parallel to that, we have seen a dramatic increase in the adoption of Internet technologies in the past years.
example
Caveat #2: Twitter is part of an information ecosystem. What we observe there is part of the story.
Picked because of the high level of violence, use of Twitter, and personal familiarity.City of Boston: 617,594 GreaterBoston area: 4,522,858
Selected one hashtag.16 months.If we assume that each account represents a unique person, our data suggests that 1.48% of people living in the cities analyzed posted some-thing on Twitter about the Mexican Drug War. Especially interesting in light of Twitter’s own estimate that 40% of their active users sign in to “just” “listen”
Interaction > Dissemination 16 months – Seattle with mentions (50.7%) were more common than retweets (15.7%).
The
Who?
Followers: Captured at the moment of the last tweet.Curators: Act as operators. Mostly (selfrepoted) females.
Fictitious names, photos. Contacted several of them. 4 replied. I present here some of the highlights of my conversation with 2.
Angela: Triangulation. ContactsDistributed geographically. Trust: “I can’t recommend anyone after what happened with [name of curator]. I can’t vouch for anybody, because I don’t know who is behind that account.” Claudia:“Not all my followers send me information but I am very thankful to those who take the time to do it
“I can’t recommend anyone” and that “after what happened with @AnonCurator3, I can’t vouch for anybody, because I don’t know who is behind that account. They are anonymous
Formalization of citizen curators. The case of this NGO called CIC.
Beginning of this research, primarily descriiptive Anecdotal evidence to Suggest