SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 14
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821
BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400
COIMBATORE
#1533, Trichy Road,
Coimbatore, India – 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921
EMAIL
info@altacit.com
WEBSITE
www.altacit.com
BAJAJ AUTO LTD
VS.
TVS MOTOR Co. LTD
PATENT INFRINGEMENT –
CASE STUDY
PREETHI NARAYANAN
JUNIOR ASSOCIATE- PATENTS
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821
BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400
COIMBATORE
#1533, Trichy Road,
Coimbatore, India – 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921
EMAIL
info@altacit.com
WEBSITE
www.altacit.com
Digital Twin Spark ignition
technology (DTSi) Vs
Controlled Combustion
Variable Timing Intelligent
(CCVTi)
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821
BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400
COIMBATORE
#1533, Trichy Road,
Coimbatore, India – 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921
EMAIL
info@altacit.com
WEBSITE
www.altacit.com
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE CASE
•In 2007 Bajaj claims patent infringement against TVS at Chennai High
Court. Single judge of Madras HC issued a temporary injunction on 16th
February, 2008 of the manufacture and sale of TVS Bikes with alleged
infringed twin spark
•TVS files a section 106 suit before the Madras High Court, claiming that
Bajaj is making “groundless threats of patent infringement” and that the
court should declare that TVS does not infringe
•Far from issuing such a declaration, the Madras High Court restrains
(injuncts) TVS, albeit to a limited extent (it could execute pending
orders, but couldnt take fresh orders for bikes).
•TVS asks for a vacation of said injunction and a Division Bench of the
same High Court agrees and vacates the injunction.
•Bajaj then appealed at the Supreme court against the Madras Division
bench decision and the supreme Court issued an interim order allowing
TVS to manufacture but restrained it from selling till final order is passed
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821
BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400
COIMBATORE
#1533, Trichy Road,
Coimbatore, India – 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921
EMAIL
info@altacit.com
WEBSITE
www.altacit.com
Bajaj Auto Limited was granted Indian Patent No.
195904 in respect of a patent application titled "An
Improved Internal combustion engine working on
four stroke principle" with a priority date of 16th
July 2002. The said invention relates to the use of
twin spark plugs for efficient combustion of lean air
fuel mixture in small bore ranging from 45 mm to 70
mm internal combustion engine working on 4 stroke
principle.
BAJAJ XCD 125 DTS-Si:
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821
BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400
COIMBATORE
#1533, Trichy Road,
Coimbatore, India – 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921
EMAIL
info@altacit.com
WEBSITE
www.altacit.com
CLAIMS FROM BAJAJ PATENT
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821
BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400
COIMBATORE
#1533, Trichy Road,
Coimbatore, India – 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921
EMAIL
info@altacit.com
WEBSITE
www.altacit.com
DTSI ENGINE
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821
BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400
COIMBATORE
#1533, Trichy Road,
Coimbatore, India – 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921
EMAIL
info@altacit.com
WEBSITE
www.altacit.com
M/s. TVS Motor Company Limited has launched
motor bikes of 125-CC on 13/14.12.2007 under the
trade mark 'FLAME' powered with a lean burn
internal combustion engine of bore size 54.5 mm
with a twin spark plug configuration, with the
Controlled Combustion Variable Timing intelligent
technology (“CC-VTi”) engine which according to
the applicant, infringes its patent No. 195904.
TVS FLAME:
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821
BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400
COIMBATORE
#1533, Trichy Road,
Coimbatore, India – 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921
EMAIL
info@altacit.com
WEBSITE
www.altacit.com
3- VALVE AND TWIN SPARK ENGINE
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821
BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400
COIMBATORE
#1533, Trichy Road,
Coimbatore, India – 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921
EMAIL
info@altacit.com
WEBSITE
www.altacit.com
•According to plaintiff, they were invented a unique technology of
using two spark plugs for efficient burning of lean air fuel mixture
in a small bore engine in the size between 45mm and 70mm.
•In small bore non-racing engines, the need to have more than one
spark plus was never thought necessary if there were no
advantages of a dual spark plug. The invention was on the
application of twin plugs in small bore engine in a specific engine
running condition of lean burn, to derive positive merits of
improved fuel efficiency and emission characteristics.
•Use of two sparks plugs was applicable in the large bore size. In
case of the small bore engines were not lean burn.
•The novelty of the invention lies on the use of lean burn engines.
•The industrial applicability lies as it helped the automobile
industry in cutting short the fuel consumption.
PATENTABILITY OF INVENTION
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821
BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400
COIMBATORE
#1533, Trichy Road,
Coimbatore, India – 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921
EMAIL
info@altacit.com
WEBSITE
www.altacit.com
The argument forwarded by the respondents, following were
the grounds used by the respondents to challenge the patent of
the applicants
1. The concept of two spark plugs being prior art- produced
various published papers
2. US patent no: 5320075 titled “Internal Combustion Engine
with Dual Ignition for a lean burn”
3. Takegawa Cylinder heads and Honda Bros, NC 25E.
Kawasaki KZ 1000 SI have configured of two valves per
cylinder with twin plugs.
4. The third valve arrangement of the respondent is protected
by patent licensed to it by AVL List GMBL: According to
the respondent, the spark plugs in the engine in its vehicle
“FLAME” are arranged in a different way in comparison to
what is claimed by plaintiff’s applicant’s patent.
DEFENDANT RESPONSE ON PATENTABILITY OF INVENTION
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821
BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400
COIMBATORE
#1533, Trichy Road,
Coimbatore, India – 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921
EMAIL
info@altacit.com
WEBSITE
www.altacit.com
The learned single judge, after considering the
submissions of both parties and considering various
facets of the case came to the conclusion.
The court relied upon the principles in granting
interlocutory injunction, including any patent action.
The principles are:
• The plantiff must prove prima facie case that the
patent is valid and infringed;
• Balance of convenience is in favor of plaintiff; and
•Irreparable loss that may be caused to plaintiff by
not granting an order of injunction.
JUDGMENT AND ANALYSIS:
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821
BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400
COIMBATORE
#1533, Trichy Road,
Coimbatore, India – 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921
EMAIL
info@altacit.com
WEBSITE
www.altacit.com
Conclusion of prima facie reveals that the product of the applicant
(BAL) for which the patent is granted as invention has found a special
place in the market. The patent granted to the applicant relates back to
the date of application (16 July 2002) or in event from the date of
introduction of the product by the applicant, (Bajaj Pulsar “DTS-I
Technology”) in 2003 and the said patent is valid for a period of 20
years as per the provision of Patents Act, 1970.
On the other hand, the respondent, who has not objected to the product
of the applicant ever since the year the patent application was
made, has chosen to file a revocation petition before the
IPAB, challenging the patent granted to the applicant for the first time
on 24th August 2007. Immediately within six days from the date of
filing of the revocation petition, the respondent has chosen to
introduce its product, including “FLAME”, which was not taken as
bono fide conduct on the part of the respondent.
-- Continued
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821
BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400
COIMBATORE
#1533, Trichy Road,
Coimbatore, India – 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921
EMAIL
info@altacit.com
WEBSITE
www.altacit.com
1. Bajaj was given patent right as it was manufacturing the
product for more than 5 years. Thus the patent was valid.
2. TVS has been allowed to sell its bike with Twin Spark
Plugs, with a court Receiver being appointed to maintain
books of profit.
3. In its interim order, the Supreme Court reiterated that in
matters relating to trademarks, copyright and patents, the
provision of the Code of Civil Procedure which mandate that
civil disputed should be heard on a day to day basis without
any adjournments, except in circumstances beyond the
control of the parties. It also directed that the final judgment
should be given normally within four months from the date of
the filing of the suit. The supreme Court directed that the
timeline stipulated above be adhered to “punctually and
faithfully” by all courts and tribunals in the country.
FINAL JUDGEMENT:
CHENNAI
3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟,
148-150, Luz Church Road,
Mylapore,
Chennai - 600 004.
Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821
BANGALORE
Suite 920, Level 9,
Raheja Towers,
26-27, M G Road,
Bangalore - 560 001.
Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400
COIMBATORE
#1533, Trichy Road,
Coimbatore, India – 641018.
Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921
EMAIL
info@altacit.com
WEBSITE
www.altacit.com

More Related Content

What's hot

Intellectual property and competition law
Intellectual property and competition lawIntellectual property and competition law
Intellectual property and competition law
Altacit Global
 
Trademark Licensing in India
Trademark Licensing in IndiaTrademark Licensing in India
Trademark Licensing in India
Manish Kumar
 
Patent opposition procedure
Patent opposition procedurePatent opposition procedure
Patent opposition procedure
Altacit Global
 

What's hot (20)

Non patentable inventions
Non patentable inventionsNon patentable inventions
Non patentable inventions
 
Infringement of Copyright (Case Laws)
Infringement of Copyright (Case Laws)Infringement of Copyright (Case Laws)
Infringement of Copyright (Case Laws)
 
Roche vs cipla patent case study
Roche vs cipla patent case studyRoche vs cipla patent case study
Roche vs cipla patent case study
 
Infringement of patents and remedies
Infringement of patents and remediesInfringement of patents and remedies
Infringement of patents and remedies
 
Intellectual property and competition law
Intellectual property and competition lawIntellectual property and competition law
Intellectual property and competition law
 
Ip licensing
Ip licensingIp licensing
Ip licensing
 
Parallel import of patented goods
Parallel import of patented goodsParallel import of patented goods
Parallel import of patented goods
 
Trademark Act, 1999
Trademark Act, 1999Trademark Act, 1999
Trademark Act, 1999
 
Trademark law ppt
Trademark law pptTrademark law ppt
Trademark law ppt
 
Passing off ppt
Passing off pptPassing off ppt
Passing off ppt
 
Compulsory licensing (patents)
Compulsory licensing (patents)Compulsory licensing (patents)
Compulsory licensing (patents)
 
17 most asked questions about Patent Agent Examination
17 most asked questions about Patent Agent Examination 17 most asked questions about Patent Agent Examination
17 most asked questions about Patent Agent Examination
 
Trademark Licensing in India
Trademark Licensing in IndiaTrademark Licensing in India
Trademark Licensing in India
 
Patent opposition procedure
Patent opposition procedurePatent opposition procedure
Patent opposition procedure
 
Trademark ppt by-pooja gurwani
Trademark ppt by-pooja gurwaniTrademark ppt by-pooja gurwani
Trademark ppt by-pooja gurwani
 
Patent Infringement
Patent InfringementPatent Infringement
Patent Infringement
 
Intellectual property Rights in India
Intellectual property Rights in IndiaIntellectual property Rights in India
Intellectual property Rights in India
 
Intellectual property litigations: A case study of Anticancer drug Glivec in ...
Intellectual property litigations: A case study of Anticancer drug Glivec in ...Intellectual property litigations: A case study of Anticancer drug Glivec in ...
Intellectual property litigations: A case study of Anticancer drug Glivec in ...
 
Case Study on Basamati Rice Patent Battle
Case Study on Basamati Rice Patent BattleCase Study on Basamati Rice Patent Battle
Case Study on Basamati Rice Patent Battle
 
Landmark case studies of IPRs
Landmark case studies of IPRsLandmark case studies of IPRs
Landmark case studies of IPRs
 

Viewers also liked

Patent infringement case
Patent infringement casePatent infringement case
Patent infringement case
Priyanka Nayak
 
Turmeric patent case
Turmeric patent caseTurmeric patent case
Turmeric patent case
Seth Romary
 
Intellectual property rights neem
Intellectual property rights   neemIntellectual property rights   neem
Intellectual property rights neem
Bhavana Rohidekar
 
016 patent infringement
016 patent infringement016 patent infringement
016 patent infringement
456 986
 
Bayer vs Natco Case
Bayer vs Natco CaseBayer vs Natco Case
Bayer vs Natco Case
Manu Dhunna
 
Product presentation basmati rice export
Product presentation basmati rice exportProduct presentation basmati rice export
Product presentation basmati rice export
ANKIT VERMA
 
whose Basmati it is?- case solution
whose Basmati it is?- case solutionwhose Basmati it is?- case solution
whose Basmati it is?- case solution
Sunny Gandhi
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Patent infringement case
Patent infringement casePatent infringement case
Patent infringement case
 
Patent infringement
Patent infringementPatent infringement
Patent infringement
 
Case studies patent
Case studies patentCase studies patent
Case studies patent
 
Basmati rice case study
 Basmati rice case study Basmati rice case study
Basmati rice case study
 
Patents (With Popular Indian Case Studies)
Patents (With Popular Indian Case Studies)Patents (With Popular Indian Case Studies)
Patents (With Popular Indian Case Studies)
 
basmati rice industry
basmati rice industrybasmati rice industry
basmati rice industry
 
Turmeric patent case
Turmeric patent caseTurmeric patent case
Turmeric patent case
 
Patent infringement
Patent infringement Patent infringement
Patent infringement
 
Patent infringement analysis
Patent infringement analysisPatent infringement analysis
Patent infringement analysis
 
Patent ppt
Patent pptPatent ppt
Patent ppt
 
Indian patent act
Indian patent actIndian patent act
Indian patent act
 
Intellectual property rights neem
Intellectual property rights   neemIntellectual property rights   neem
Intellectual property rights neem
 
016 patent infringement
016 patent infringement016 patent infringement
016 patent infringement
 
Bayer vs Natco Case
Bayer vs Natco CaseBayer vs Natco Case
Bayer vs Natco Case
 
Product presentation basmati rice export
Product presentation basmati rice exportProduct presentation basmati rice export
Product presentation basmati rice export
 
The patent act
The patent actThe patent act
The patent act
 
Louis vuitton Vs. Google
Louis vuitton Vs. GoogleLouis vuitton Vs. Google
Louis vuitton Vs. Google
 
The Meaning of Patent Infringement and Patent Litigation
The Meaning of Patent Infringement and Patent LitigationThe Meaning of Patent Infringement and Patent Litigation
The Meaning of Patent Infringement and Patent Litigation
 
whose Basmati it is?- case solution
whose Basmati it is?- case solutionwhose Basmati it is?- case solution
whose Basmati it is?- case solution
 
Patent database
Patent databasePatent database
Patent database
 

Similar to Bajaj vs tvs patent infringement - case study

Business method patents
Business method patentsBusiness method patents
Business method patents
Altacit Global
 
Pharma patent development in 2012
Pharma patent development in 2012Pharma patent development in 2012
Pharma patent development in 2012
Altacit Global
 
Iprandcompetitionlaws 131123062348-phpapp01
Iprandcompetitionlaws 131123062348-phpapp01Iprandcompetitionlaws 131123062348-phpapp01
Iprandcompetitionlaws 131123062348-phpapp01
AnjaliGupta437
 
Ipr and competition laws
Ipr and competition lawsIpr and competition laws
Ipr and competition laws
Altacit Global
 

Similar to Bajaj vs tvs patent infringement - case study (20)

Field use of limitation
Field use of limitationField use of limitation
Field use of limitation
 
Formula 1 racing and ip protection
Formula 1 racing and ip protectionFormula 1 racing and ip protection
Formula 1 racing and ip protection
 
Enercon’s patent litigation
Enercon’s patent litigationEnercon’s patent litigation
Enercon’s patent litigation
 
Standard essential patent
Standard essential patentStandard essential patent
Standard essential patent
 
Patent pool and antitrust
Patent pool and antitrustPatent pool and antitrust
Patent pool and antitrust
 
Business method patents
Business method patentsBusiness method patents
Business method patents
 
Section 8 non compliance
Section 8 non complianceSection 8 non compliance
Section 8 non compliance
 
Wrongful Termination
Wrongful TerminationWrongful Termination
Wrongful Termination
 
Novelty on patents
Novelty on patentsNovelty on patents
Novelty on patents
 
Pharma patent development in 2012
Pharma patent development in 2012Pharma patent development in 2012
Pharma patent development in 2012
 
Dabur india vs_rajeshkumar
Dabur india vs_rajeshkumarDabur india vs_rajeshkumar
Dabur india vs_rajeshkumar
 
Ipr and software
Ipr and softwareIpr and software
Ipr and software
 
Steps to incorporation of a company in india
Steps to incorporation of a company in indiaSteps to incorporation of a company in india
Steps to incorporation of a company in india
 
Iprandcompetitionlaws 131123062348-phpapp01
Iprandcompetitionlaws 131123062348-phpapp01Iprandcompetitionlaws 131123062348-phpapp01
Iprandcompetitionlaws 131123062348-phpapp01
 
Ipr and competition laws
Ipr and competition lawsIpr and competition laws
Ipr and competition laws
 
Hindustan lever vs eureka forbes (aquasure case)
Hindustan lever vs eureka forbes (aquasure case)Hindustan lever vs eureka forbes (aquasure case)
Hindustan lever vs eureka forbes (aquasure case)
 
Intellectual property laws vs competition laws
Intellectual  property  laws vs competition lawsIntellectual  property  laws vs competition laws
Intellectual property laws vs competition laws
 
Minor’s rights under ip laws
Minor’s rights under ip lawsMinor’s rights under ip laws
Minor’s rights under ip laws
 
In phase vs. abb
In phase vs. abbIn phase vs. abb
In phase vs. abb
 
An analysis of apple’s patent to block recording
An analysis of apple’s patent to block recordingAn analysis of apple’s patent to block recording
An analysis of apple’s patent to block recording
 

More from Altacit Global

More from Altacit Global (20)

Unmanned aircraft system rules, 2020
Unmanned aircraft system rules, 2020Unmanned aircraft system rules, 2020
Unmanned aircraft system rules, 2020
 
Sexual harassment during work from home
Sexual harassment during work from homeSexual harassment during work from home
Sexual harassment during work from home
 
Information technology guidelines for intermediaries and digital media ethics...
Information technology guidelines for intermediaries and digital media ethics...Information technology guidelines for intermediaries and digital media ethics...
Information technology guidelines for intermediaries and digital media ethics...
 
Returns and refunds consumer protection act
Returns and refunds  consumer protection actReturns and refunds  consumer protection act
Returns and refunds consumer protection act
 
Rights of an unborn child
Rights of an unborn childRights of an unborn child
Rights of an unborn child
 
Grounds for divorce in India
Grounds for divorce in IndiaGrounds for divorce in India
Grounds for divorce in India
 
Alimony laws in India
Alimony laws in IndiaAlimony laws in India
Alimony laws in India
 
Patent licensing
Patent licensingPatent licensing
Patent licensing
 
Surrogacy laws-in-India
Surrogacy laws-in-IndiaSurrogacy laws-in-India
Surrogacy laws-in-India
 
I r s form w-9
I r s form w-9I r s form w-9
I r s form w-9
 
Tamilnadu regulation of rights and responsibilities of landlords and tenants ...
Tamilnadu regulation of rights and responsibilities of landlords and tenants ...Tamilnadu regulation of rights and responsibilities of landlords and tenants ...
Tamilnadu regulation of rights and responsibilities of landlords and tenants ...
 
Requirements for operation of civil remotely piloted aircraft system
Requirements for operation of civil remotely piloted aircraft systemRequirements for operation of civil remotely piloted aircraft system
Requirements for operation of civil remotely piloted aircraft system
 
Rights of employees under insolvent companies
Rights of employees under insolvent companiesRights of employees under insolvent companies
Rights of employees under insolvent companies
 
Doctrine of originality copyright
Doctrine of originality copyrightDoctrine of originality copyright
Doctrine of originality copyright
 
Restoration of lapsed patents in India
Restoration of lapsed patents in IndiaRestoration of lapsed patents in India
Restoration of lapsed patents in India
 
Celebrity rights in India
Celebrity rights in IndiaCelebrity rights in India
Celebrity rights in India
 
Technology Development Board
Technology Development BoardTechnology Development Board
Technology Development Board
 
Motor accident mediation authority (MAMA)
Motor accident mediation authority (MAMA)Motor accident mediation authority (MAMA)
Motor accident mediation authority (MAMA)
 
Sebi (prohibition of insider trading) regulations, 2015
Sebi (prohibition of insider trading) regulations, 2015Sebi (prohibition of insider trading) regulations, 2015
Sebi (prohibition of insider trading) regulations, 2015
 
Legality of cryptocurrency in India
Legality of cryptocurrency in IndiaLegality of cryptocurrency in India
Legality of cryptocurrency in India
 

Recently uploaded

Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please PractiseSpellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
AnaAcapella
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdfKey note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
Key note speaker Neum_Admir Softic_ENG.pdf
 
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning PresentationSOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
SOC 101 Demonstration of Learning Presentation
 
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdfFood safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
Food safety_Challenges food safety laboratories_.pdf
 
Kodo Millet PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...
Kodo Millet  PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...Kodo Millet  PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...
Kodo Millet PPT made by Ghanshyam bairwa college of Agriculture kumher bhara...
 
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
How to Create and Manage Wizard in Odoo 17
 
Making communications land - Are they received and understood as intended? we...
Making communications land - Are they received and understood as intended? we...Making communications land - Are they received and understood as intended? we...
Making communications land - Are they received and understood as intended? we...
 
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
ComPTIA Overview | Comptia Security+ Book SY0-701
 
Single or Multiple melodic lines structure
Single or Multiple melodic lines structureSingle or Multiple melodic lines structure
Single or Multiple melodic lines structure
 
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
Explore beautiful and ugly buildings. Mathematics helps us create beautiful d...
 
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptxHMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
HMCS Max Bernays Pre-Deployment Brief (May 2024).pptx
 
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - EnglishGraduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English
Graduate Outcomes Presentation Slides - English
 
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdfMicro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
Micro-Scholarship, What it is, How can it help me.pdf
 
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptxUnit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
Unit-IV; Professional Sales Representative (PSR).pptx
 
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin ClassesMixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
 
Dyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptx
Dyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptxDyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptx
Dyslexia AI Workshop for Slideshare.pptx
 
Google Gemini An AI Revolution in Education.pptx
Google Gemini An AI Revolution in Education.pptxGoogle Gemini An AI Revolution in Education.pptx
Google Gemini An AI Revolution in Education.pptx
 
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
ICT role in 21st century education and it's challenges.
 
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
 
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
How to Give a Domain for a Field in Odoo 17
 
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please PractiseSpellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
Spellings Wk 3 English CAPS CARES Please Practise
 

Bajaj vs tvs patent infringement - case study

  • 1. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE #1533, Trichy Road, Coimbatore, India – 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com BAJAJ AUTO LTD VS. TVS MOTOR Co. LTD PATENT INFRINGEMENT – CASE STUDY PREETHI NARAYANAN JUNIOR ASSOCIATE- PATENTS
  • 2. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE #1533, Trichy Road, Coimbatore, India – 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com Digital Twin Spark ignition technology (DTSi) Vs Controlled Combustion Variable Timing Intelligent (CCVTi)
  • 3. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE #1533, Trichy Road, Coimbatore, India – 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE CASE •In 2007 Bajaj claims patent infringement against TVS at Chennai High Court. Single judge of Madras HC issued a temporary injunction on 16th February, 2008 of the manufacture and sale of TVS Bikes with alleged infringed twin spark •TVS files a section 106 suit before the Madras High Court, claiming that Bajaj is making “groundless threats of patent infringement” and that the court should declare that TVS does not infringe •Far from issuing such a declaration, the Madras High Court restrains (injuncts) TVS, albeit to a limited extent (it could execute pending orders, but couldnt take fresh orders for bikes). •TVS asks for a vacation of said injunction and a Division Bench of the same High Court agrees and vacates the injunction. •Bajaj then appealed at the Supreme court against the Madras Division bench decision and the supreme Court issued an interim order allowing TVS to manufacture but restrained it from selling till final order is passed
  • 4. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE #1533, Trichy Road, Coimbatore, India – 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com Bajaj Auto Limited was granted Indian Patent No. 195904 in respect of a patent application titled "An Improved Internal combustion engine working on four stroke principle" with a priority date of 16th July 2002. The said invention relates to the use of twin spark plugs for efficient combustion of lean air fuel mixture in small bore ranging from 45 mm to 70 mm internal combustion engine working on 4 stroke principle. BAJAJ XCD 125 DTS-Si:
  • 5. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE #1533, Trichy Road, Coimbatore, India – 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com CLAIMS FROM BAJAJ PATENT
  • 6. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE #1533, Trichy Road, Coimbatore, India – 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com DTSI ENGINE
  • 7. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE #1533, Trichy Road, Coimbatore, India – 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com M/s. TVS Motor Company Limited has launched motor bikes of 125-CC on 13/14.12.2007 under the trade mark 'FLAME' powered with a lean burn internal combustion engine of bore size 54.5 mm with a twin spark plug configuration, with the Controlled Combustion Variable Timing intelligent technology (“CC-VTi”) engine which according to the applicant, infringes its patent No. 195904. TVS FLAME:
  • 8. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE #1533, Trichy Road, Coimbatore, India – 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com 3- VALVE AND TWIN SPARK ENGINE
  • 9. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE #1533, Trichy Road, Coimbatore, India – 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com •According to plaintiff, they were invented a unique technology of using two spark plugs for efficient burning of lean air fuel mixture in a small bore engine in the size between 45mm and 70mm. •In small bore non-racing engines, the need to have more than one spark plus was never thought necessary if there were no advantages of a dual spark plug. The invention was on the application of twin plugs in small bore engine in a specific engine running condition of lean burn, to derive positive merits of improved fuel efficiency and emission characteristics. •Use of two sparks plugs was applicable in the large bore size. In case of the small bore engines were not lean burn. •The novelty of the invention lies on the use of lean burn engines. •The industrial applicability lies as it helped the automobile industry in cutting short the fuel consumption. PATENTABILITY OF INVENTION
  • 10. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE #1533, Trichy Road, Coimbatore, India – 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com The argument forwarded by the respondents, following were the grounds used by the respondents to challenge the patent of the applicants 1. The concept of two spark plugs being prior art- produced various published papers 2. US patent no: 5320075 titled “Internal Combustion Engine with Dual Ignition for a lean burn” 3. Takegawa Cylinder heads and Honda Bros, NC 25E. Kawasaki KZ 1000 SI have configured of two valves per cylinder with twin plugs. 4. The third valve arrangement of the respondent is protected by patent licensed to it by AVL List GMBL: According to the respondent, the spark plugs in the engine in its vehicle “FLAME” are arranged in a different way in comparison to what is claimed by plaintiff’s applicant’s patent. DEFENDANT RESPONSE ON PATENTABILITY OF INVENTION
  • 11. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE #1533, Trichy Road, Coimbatore, India – 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com The learned single judge, after considering the submissions of both parties and considering various facets of the case came to the conclusion. The court relied upon the principles in granting interlocutory injunction, including any patent action. The principles are: • The plantiff must prove prima facie case that the patent is valid and infringed; • Balance of convenience is in favor of plaintiff; and •Irreparable loss that may be caused to plaintiff by not granting an order of injunction. JUDGMENT AND ANALYSIS:
  • 12. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE #1533, Trichy Road, Coimbatore, India – 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com Conclusion of prima facie reveals that the product of the applicant (BAL) for which the patent is granted as invention has found a special place in the market. The patent granted to the applicant relates back to the date of application (16 July 2002) or in event from the date of introduction of the product by the applicant, (Bajaj Pulsar “DTS-I Technology”) in 2003 and the said patent is valid for a period of 20 years as per the provision of Patents Act, 1970. On the other hand, the respondent, who has not objected to the product of the applicant ever since the year the patent application was made, has chosen to file a revocation petition before the IPAB, challenging the patent granted to the applicant for the first time on 24th August 2007. Immediately within six days from the date of filing of the revocation petition, the respondent has chosen to introduce its product, including “FLAME”, which was not taken as bono fide conduct on the part of the respondent. -- Continued
  • 13. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE #1533, Trichy Road, Coimbatore, India – 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com 1. Bajaj was given patent right as it was manufacturing the product for more than 5 years. Thus the patent was valid. 2. TVS has been allowed to sell its bike with Twin Spark Plugs, with a court Receiver being appointed to maintain books of profit. 3. In its interim order, the Supreme Court reiterated that in matters relating to trademarks, copyright and patents, the provision of the Code of Civil Procedure which mandate that civil disputed should be heard on a day to day basis without any adjournments, except in circumstances beyond the control of the parties. It also directed that the final judgment should be given normally within four months from the date of the filing of the suit. The supreme Court directed that the timeline stipulated above be adhered to “punctually and faithfully” by all courts and tribunals in the country. FINAL JUDGEMENT:
  • 14. CHENNAI 3rd Floor, „Creative Enclave‟, 148-150, Luz Church Road, Mylapore, Chennai - 600 004. Tel: +91 - 44 - 2498 4821 BANGALORE Suite 920, Level 9, Raheja Towers, 26-27, M G Road, Bangalore - 560 001. Tel: +91 - 80 - 6546 2400 COIMBATORE #1533, Trichy Road, Coimbatore, India – 641018. Tel: +91 - 422 – 6552921 EMAIL info@altacit.com WEBSITE www.altacit.com