ABOUT THIS WEBINAR:
The standard accepted methodology for designing e-learning is the five step ADDIE process: Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. Often project success rests on the analysis activities, yet designers commonly admit that little emphasis is placed on analysis, or that it is skipped altogether because content was pre-screened by a subject matter expert, or they believed that analysis is already complete. Unfortunately, analysis carried out by dedicated SMEs often is completely content bound, with a focus on content knowledge goals that don’t address key aspects of how the knowledge is applied.
Attendees will learn the five key questions to ask during instructional analysis, the answers to which are necessary to create the kind of interactivity that results in performance change. Looking well beyond surface issues of content knowledge, the questions instead focus on the users and how the lesson content can best address their needs and motivations. You’ll get concrete processes that will directly impact the relevance and effectiveness of any e-learning you build, as well as see real working e-learning courses resulting from this approach to analysis.
In this session, you will learn:
- Why traditional ADDIE analysis often fails to identify critical challenges
- The risks and pitfalls of skipping meaningful analysis when starting an e-learning design
- Five powerful questions that will transform your design process
- How to conduct user-centered design to fully include users in defining the desired outcomes
"Subclassing and Composition – A Pythonic Tour of Trade-Offs", Hynek Schlawack
The 5 Most Important Analysis Questions You'll Ever Ask
1.
2.
3. Grab a piece of paper or open a Notepad
document and take a moment to write
down what you think are the most
important analysis questions when you
are starting out on an e-learning project.
5. The Challenges designing for e-Learning:
Instruction must stand on its own
Can’t be adjusted or fixed on the fly
6. The Challenges designing for e-Learning:
Instruction must stand on its own
Can’t be adjusted or fixed on the fly
Must account for all the things an instructor might do
7. None of this matters if you or your organization is
investing in e-learning entirely because of the
operational advantages it provides: easy
tracking, 24/7 availability, reduce travel
costs, eliminated dependence on expensive
resources, etc.
8. None of this matters if you or your organization
believes that designing for e-learning is essentially
formatting information, decorating screens, and
testing.
9. e-Learning, as an interactive individualized medium,
requires careful planning for EXPERIENCES that will
create LASTING and BENEFICIAL CHANGE in the
PERFORMANCE environment.
Our goal as designers is to create opportunities for
learning that will happen more efficiently and more
assuredly than would happen otherwise.
10.
11. Analysis skipped altogether
Let’s face it, many authoring systems don’t even
support design. They provide formatting
options, and often those decisions are taken out
of the hands of designers by uniform
templates, lesson structures, and question
formats that can’t be modified.
12. Analysis skipped altogether
Analysis “done” already by SMEs
Many SMEs don’t view analysis as a dialog with
the designer, but rather as a content dump--the
opportunity to document their encyclopedic
knowledge. Documentation of content doesn’t
equal design. It might prepare you to write a
Wikipedia article but not how to teach the
content.
13. Analysis skipped altogether
Analysis “done” already by SMEs
It is unreasonable to expect e-learning to create
expertise. A more reasonable expectation is that
it can create minimal competence.
14. Analysis skipped altogether
Analysis “done” already by SMEs
Course already exists…conversion
doesn’t require analysis, right?
The organization doesn’t recognize the essential
differences in preparing content for individualized
instruction via e-learning than standard instructor-
led courses.
26. Why is this important?
Risk and Consequences are some of the strongest tools
you have to create motivation and buy-in. Remember
that the consequences to YOU or the ORGANIZATION
are often different that the consequences to the
LEARNER.
28. Example: Sexual Harassment Training
Risk to organization: legal requirement
Risk to learner: personal growth, safe work
environment, successful work relationships continued
employment
33. Why is this important?
SMEs are often quite removed from actual
performance environments and are unaware of some
of the real challenges. (Recent learners who are now
successful make very good experts!)
34. Why is this important?
Content accounts don’t accurately represent expected
performance.
35. Why is this important?
SMEs are often quite removed from actual
performance environments and are unaware of some
of the real challenges. (Recent learners who are now
successful make very good experts!)
38. Why is this important?
We learn most effectively and most memorably by
making mistakes, assessing how our performance was
off target, and then correcting…and then practicing.
39. Why is this important?
We learn most effectively and most memorably by
making mistakes, assessing how our performance was
off target, and then correcting…and then practicing.
So the most important challenges to design into the
training are opportunities for the learners to make the
same kind of mistakes they will be tempted to do in
the performance environment.
44. Why is this important?
We make our training challenges more difficult than
they need to be if we ignore the resources and aids
that are available to the learner. In fact, guiding
learners in appropriate use of those resources should
be one of the critical performance objectives.