5. API Growth (2006-2009) 55 points in 4 years API Growth(2007– 2010)

6. API – ELA % proficient/advanced

7. API - Math % Proficient / Advanced

8. API - ELA Learning Gap

9. API - Math Learning Gap

10. English Learners % Proficient / Advanced ELA Math 23% increase 6% Decrease 6% decrease

12. ELA Movement % of Students

13. ELA Movement Number of Students

14. Math Movement % of Students

15. Math Movement Number of Students

16. % Pro/Adv in ELA & Math by Grade Level

18. Pyramid of Intervention Intensive Students Leveled by need within grade level; So Simple and Read Naturally, SIPPS (3 rd ) Strategic Students Read Naturally- Students leveled among teachers for correct Read Naturally level, SIPPS (3 rd ) Benchmark Students Read Naturally at grade level

19. Student Movement in CELDT 2008/09 – 2009/10 Summary Score Key Level Total Gainers Stickers Sliders Gainers n % n % n % n % Stickers Sliders Level 1 46 26% 33 72% 13 28% 0 0% Level 2 40 23% 16 40% 19 48% 5 12% Level 3 71 41% 19 27% 41 58% 11 15% Level 4 16 9% 1 6% 8 50% 7 44% Level 5 1 1% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100% Total 174 100% 69 39% 81 46% 24 13%

22. 2009 Accountability Progress Report

27. API Growth (2006-2009) 61 points in 4 years 727 APY Growth (2006 – 2010)

28. RTI – Data By June 2010: Benchmark students increased by 21% Strategic students decreased by 29% Intensive students decreased by 19%

30. Academic Success is Non-negotiable