Assistant chairs webinar (Sept 15, 2010)
•Transferir como PPT, PDF•
1 gostou•371 visualizações
Recomendados
Recomendados
Mais conteúdo relacionado
Destaque
Destaque (18)
Semelhante a Assistant chairs webinar (Sept 15, 2010)
Semelhante a Assistant chairs webinar (Sept 15, 2010) (20)
Mais de WASC Senior
Mais de WASC Senior (10)
Último
Último (20)
Assistant chairs webinar (Sept 15, 2010)
- 1. Assistant Chair Webinar Wednesday, September 15, 2010 Please join the audio portion of this training: 866-740-1260, Access Code: 7489001 ReadyTalk Help Desk: 800.843.9166 International Help: 303.209.1600
- 2. Announcements This presentation and the accompanying materials are available for download from: http://www.wascsenior.org/acresources For assistance with Voice and Web connections please contact: ReadyTalk Help Desk, 800.843.9166 International Help: 303.209.1600 Please mute your microphone if you are not speaking
- 22. Thank you for your service to WASC and the region This presentation and the accompanying materials are available for download from: http://www.wascsenior.org/acresources
Notas do Editor
- Introductions Name, institution, institution being visited, experience as AC
- Importance of role of the AC for the effectiveness of the visit and quality of the report
- Importance of role of the AC for the effectiveness of the visit and quality of the report
- Compiling: Sometimes a summary is needed. Keith re color coding.
- New report forms to be sent this summer
- See common problems later
- Emails as extension of open meeting No unsupported claims should get into report
- BEFORE LEAVING campus
- Team chair is responsible for finalizing draft, asking ALO/CEO for corrections of fact, and then finalizing report and getting it to WASC Team chairs vary in degree of control and involvement at this stage of AC and rest of team
- Ask Eleanor, Jackie and John E for comments on this as Commissioners: clarity, what do you really think? Don’t pull punches. Links to CFRs. Report should not tell how to fix a problem.
- This is one of weaknesses we see in team reports. Conclusions not supported by evidence. Focus too much on process re assessment of student learning without discussion of results. “They are doing it” as opposed to “This is what they found about what student learn when they did it.”
- Usually 3-5 main recommendations in a report, unless there are serious issues. IF the team is recommending a sanction, need to be very specific and even more conscientious about documenting basis for findings.