SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 30
AN ASSESSMENT-BASED
      DEGREE


    November 1, 2012
  WCET Annual Conference
The Iron Triangle
2



                   Cost




      Quality             Access
Scalability of Content
3




     Open Educational Resources: accessible
      to millions
     Independent Study

     Requires that learners be self-motivated
Types of OER

              Lecture notes                  Physics lecture

              Videos of classroom lectures
              Lessons designed for OER
              Courses
OpenStud
y             Discussion groups




                                                Khan Academy


                Open
                University
What is OER’s value?

   Learning
   Certificates

But…
 OER by itself does not typically
  award formal educational credit

                   Why not?
Academic credit
6




       What is credit?
         Assurance   that someone knows something
         The something must be appropriate for the
          particular academic program
       To provide that assurance, both the
        someone and the something must be
        verified
Decoupling assessment from the
7
    classroom
    “What you know is more important than where or
                 how you learned it.”

       Credit should be based on knowledge, not
                      attendance

     Knowledge gained through independent study
           can be independently assessed
Aspects of validity for credit by
    assessment
8




          Identity   verification

          Assessment      quality

          Appropriateness   of knowledge
          tested for a particular degree
          program

          Scalability
Identity verification
9




     Ryan Ruppe




                                 Jeffery Turner




                  Steve Winton
Threats to validity--courses
10




        Did the person actually go through the course?
        Did the person do his/her own work?
        Is the person who took the course the same
         person who is presenting the credential?
Threats to validity--
11
     assessments
        Is the person taking the assessment the same
         person who is claiming the knowledge?
        Is the person claiming the knowledge the same
         person who is presenting the credential?
Assessment quality
12


      A good assessment
       Measures knowledge of the subject

       Does not measure irrelevant characteristics

       Gives a person the same score regardless of
        which form is taken
       Gives people of the same ability the same score
Threats to assessment quality
13


        Assessments may not measure quite the same
         content as the material studied
          Not
             all things in the world labeled “Sociology”
          cover the same topics!
        Assessments may not cover material in
         enough depth
         A 10-question quiz is unlikely to cover the
          equivalent of a college semester’s worth of
          content
Threats to assessment quality
14


        The assessment might not be scored
         consistently enough
          Different   instructors have different standards
        Assessments might measure irrelevant
         characteristics
          Unnecessarily  complicated questions
          Questions with “giveaway” answers

          Trick questions
Appropriateness of content
15


        Match of assessment to OER
          How  close are the assessment specifications to
          the learning objectives of the OER material?

        Match of assessment to credit-granting body
          How  close are the assessment
          specifications/learning objectives to what is taught
          at the institution where credit is sought?
Efficient assessment
   Machine-scored competency/proficiency
    exams can handle large numbers of
    examinees and be used for multiple OER
    sources
   Machine-scored exams need not measure
    simply mindless regurgitation of facts
   For some types of OER, more specific
    assessments may be needed
     Portfolios   for highly specialized content

         Cost of a 3-credit multiple-choice
                     assessment:
Scalability - Generalizability
   Less
generalizable
                   Course final exams and homework
                   Third-party assessments designed
                    for a specific course
                   Competency/proficiency
                    assessments


   More
generalizable
Scalability – Large groups

Less scalable
                   Individual assessments
                     Portfolios
                     Research papers
                     Oral examinations

                   Human-scored group assessments
                     Short answer questions
                     Essay questions

                   Machine-scored assessments
                     Multiple-choice exams
                     Machine-scored constructed response
More scalable         exams
A model for low-cost
            education




OER University
What is Charter Oak State College?



    Founded in 1973 in Connecticut
    Enrollment about 2,000
    Over 11,000 degrees awarded, with alumni from
     all 50 states and a dozen countries
    Partnerships with military branches
    Associate and Baccalaureate degrees
    New England Association of Schools and Colleges
     accreditation
What is Charter Oak State College?


   Aggregation model - with Cornerstone and
    Capstone
       Outcome assessment courses
       Writing, research, program planning
   Transfer credit
   CBE, portfolio assessment, ACE and National
    CCRS, CCAP, institutionally reviewed training
    and certifications
Student Profile
                                   CONCENTRATION PLAN OF STUDY (CPS) FORM
                                              Business Administration

                        MINIMUM                                                                      Number and Level of
     MINIMUM SUBJECT
                       REQUIRED    SOURCE: TEST OR INSTITUTION    COURSE/TEST NO. & TITLE   GRADE      Credits Propose
      REQUIREMENTS
                        CREDITS                                                                     Lower          Upper


Accounting:            3 credits            CLEP                 Financial Accounting       Prop      (3)
  Financial *
  Managerial *         3 credits        StraighterLine             Managerial Acct.          B         3
Finance:               3 credits            DSST                     Prin. Finance          Prop      (3)
   Principles * or
   Managerial * or
   Corporate
Management:            3 credits       Excelsior Coll.           Organizational Behav       Prop                    3
   Organizational
   Behavior
Management:            3 credits        Northwood U.             MGT 230 Prin. Mgt.          A        2.7
   Intro/Principles
   Management*

Marketing:             3 credits        Northwood U.             MKT 208 Prin. Mark.         C+       2.7
   Principles of
   Marketing*
Strategic Processes    3 credits            COSC                  MGT 499 Strategic         Prop                   3
Capstone Course                                                     Management
Program Planning
Hi Karen,

As per your request, I've included a list below of tests/ independent
studies courses I am planning on taking for my degree.
•  Pending exams/courses:
   •   Cornerstone course (IDS 101)- in progress
   •   College Algebra - Straighterline, in progress
   •   English Composition II - Straighterline, in progress
   •   Mgmt Info Systems - DSST (area of concentration)
   •   Environment & Humanity – DSST
   •   *Business Ethics in Society - DSST (UL area of concentration)
   •   Organizational Behavior - Excelsior Exam(UL area of concentration)
   •   Principles of Public Speaking - DSST
Class of 2011-12 & CBE


2011-12 Charter Oak State
College Graduates:

                                                                Average of Test Credit
                            Graduates   Average of Test Count   Hours



No Testing                  310                                                          64%


Took 1 or more tests        176         5.23                              17.64          36%

Grand Total                 486         5.23                              17.64
What Is Excelsior College?
   Independent institution serving adult students and other
    non-traditional learners since 1971
   Enrollment 34,000; alumni 141,000
   Up to one-third of EC students are
      Members of historically under-represented groups

      Military or veterans

   Average age of graduates: late 30s
   Associate, Baccalaureate, and Masters degrees
   Middle States accreditation
What Is Excelsior College?
   Aggregation model
       EC online courses (available since 2004)
       Two national exam series developed in house: ECE and UExcel
       Transfer credit
         Consistently ranked #1 or #2 in acceptance of credit from
          other accredited institutions
       Other CBE, portfolio assessment, ACE and National
        CCRS, institutionally reviewed training and certifications
   Largest pre-licensure nursing program in the
    country, entirely assessment based
Excelsior College Exam-Based Degree Paths


   New degree pathways emphasize Excelsior’s own CBE
    products, along with a single required Capstone course
   Degree planning templates show suggested sequence
    of exams; students with transfer credit have wider
    choices
   Supported Independent Study model is based on Open
    Courseware options reviewed and recommended for all
    exams
   Initial degree templates for BS and BA in Liberal Studies
    and AS and BS in General Business
Sample ASB Degree Template

   (ETC ASB example)
Infrastructure Needs
29


        Common definitions of assessment-based
         learning among the Regional Accreditors
        Access to Federal Financial Aid
          Proposal:a demonstration program that lets a set
          of low cost assessment approaches prove their
          merits.
        National Database of existing credential and
         training assessments
A New Narrative
30


        We need to add a chapter to the higher
         education biography.

        The story begins with Socratic learning, moves
         to libraries, adds faculty, morphs
         universities, carves land grants from the
         wilderness, upscales adult education into
         Community Colleges, and invests in for-profits.

        Now the story must add competency-based
         credentialing

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Semelhante a An assessment based_degree

Professional development in MCQ writing
Professional development in MCQ writingProfessional development in MCQ writing
Professional development in MCQ writingSusie Macfarlane
 
ITC12 Pre-conference Workshop: Evaluating Online Faculty2-slideshare
ITC12 Pre-conference Workshop: Evaluating Online Faculty2-slideshareITC12 Pre-conference Workshop: Evaluating Online Faculty2-slideshare
ITC12 Pre-conference Workshop: Evaluating Online Faculty2-slidesharexlents
 
A Competency based Management Workshop.pptx
A Competency based Management Workshop.pptxA Competency based Management Workshop.pptx
A Competency based Management Workshop.pptxSaqib Mansoor Ahmed
 
A Workshop On Competency based Management
A Workshop On Competency based ManagementA Workshop On Competency based Management
A Workshop On Competency based ManagementSaqib Mansoor Ahmed
 
Competency based learning and OER webinar
Competency based learning and OER webinarCompetency based learning and OER webinar
Competency based learning and OER webinarUna Daly
 
Prior Learning Assessment a Student's Perspective ppt oct 2010 af
Prior Learning Assessment a Student's Perspective ppt oct 2010 afPrior Learning Assessment a Student's Perspective ppt oct 2010 af
Prior Learning Assessment a Student's Perspective ppt oct 2010 afMara Kaufmann
 
Ieva Stupans 2008
Ieva Stupans 2008Ieva Stupans 2008
Ieva Stupans 2008Diana Quinn
 
Designing standards-based rubrics
Designing standards-based rubricsDesigning standards-based rubrics
Designing standards-based rubricsSusie Macfarlane
 
eAssessment in practice
eAssessment in practiceeAssessment in practice
eAssessment in practiceIan Brown
 
Credit for Prior Learning.pdf
Credit for Prior Learning.pdfCredit for Prior Learning.pdf
Credit for Prior Learning.pdfEddieeBroke
 
Competency Workshop for Executives01.pptx
Competency Workshop for Executives01.pptxCompetency Workshop for Executives01.pptx
Competency Workshop for Executives01.pptxSaqib Mansoor Ahmed
 
Assessment as learning
Assessment as learningAssessment as learning
Assessment as learningAnup Singh
 
Assessment: Achieving improved efficiency, effectiveness, educational integri...
Assessment:Achieving improved efficiency, effectiveness, educational integri...Assessment:Achieving improved efficiency, effectiveness, educational integri...
Assessment: Achieving improved efficiency, effectiveness, educational integri...Diana Quinn
 
Understanding the IB Diploma
Understanding the IB DiplomaUnderstanding the IB Diploma
Understanding the IB Diplomaejk12
 
Rubric\'s Cube--Complimenting, Critiquing, and Challenging Student Work (NELB...
Rubric\'s Cube--Complimenting, Critiquing, and Challenging Student Work (NELB...Rubric\'s Cube--Complimenting, Critiquing, and Challenging Student Work (NELB...
Rubric\'s Cube--Complimenting, Critiquing, and Challenging Student Work (NELB...Mark Eutsler
 
Assessment 15 Annotated
Assessment 15 AnnotatedAssessment 15 Annotated
Assessment 15 AnnotatedJames Atherton
 
Evaluation in Education
Evaluation in EducationEvaluation in Education
Evaluation in EducationKusum Gaur
 
ACE+-+Blackboard+CBE+Research.pptx
ACE+-+Blackboard+CBE+Research.pptxACE+-+Blackboard+CBE+Research.pptx
ACE+-+Blackboard+CBE+Research.pptxashayadav78
 
ACE+-+Blackboard+CBE+Research.pptx
ACE+-+Blackboard+CBE+Research.pptxACE+-+Blackboard+CBE+Research.pptx
ACE+-+Blackboard+CBE+Research.pptxashayadav78
 

Semelhante a An assessment based_degree (20)

Maharg plenary panel slides
Maharg plenary panel slidesMaharg plenary panel slides
Maharg plenary panel slides
 
Professional development in MCQ writing
Professional development in MCQ writingProfessional development in MCQ writing
Professional development in MCQ writing
 
ITC12 Pre-conference Workshop: Evaluating Online Faculty2-slideshare
ITC12 Pre-conference Workshop: Evaluating Online Faculty2-slideshareITC12 Pre-conference Workshop: Evaluating Online Faculty2-slideshare
ITC12 Pre-conference Workshop: Evaluating Online Faculty2-slideshare
 
A Competency based Management Workshop.pptx
A Competency based Management Workshop.pptxA Competency based Management Workshop.pptx
A Competency based Management Workshop.pptx
 
A Workshop On Competency based Management
A Workshop On Competency based ManagementA Workshop On Competency based Management
A Workshop On Competency based Management
 
Competency based learning and OER webinar
Competency based learning and OER webinarCompetency based learning and OER webinar
Competency based learning and OER webinar
 
Prior Learning Assessment a Student's Perspective ppt oct 2010 af
Prior Learning Assessment a Student's Perspective ppt oct 2010 afPrior Learning Assessment a Student's Perspective ppt oct 2010 af
Prior Learning Assessment a Student's Perspective ppt oct 2010 af
 
Ieva Stupans 2008
Ieva Stupans 2008Ieva Stupans 2008
Ieva Stupans 2008
 
Designing standards-based rubrics
Designing standards-based rubricsDesigning standards-based rubrics
Designing standards-based rubrics
 
eAssessment in practice
eAssessment in practiceeAssessment in practice
eAssessment in practice
 
Credit for Prior Learning.pdf
Credit for Prior Learning.pdfCredit for Prior Learning.pdf
Credit for Prior Learning.pdf
 
Competency Workshop for Executives01.pptx
Competency Workshop for Executives01.pptxCompetency Workshop for Executives01.pptx
Competency Workshop for Executives01.pptx
 
Assessment as learning
Assessment as learningAssessment as learning
Assessment as learning
 
Assessment: Achieving improved efficiency, effectiveness, educational integri...
Assessment:Achieving improved efficiency, effectiveness, educational integri...Assessment:Achieving improved efficiency, effectiveness, educational integri...
Assessment: Achieving improved efficiency, effectiveness, educational integri...
 
Understanding the IB Diploma
Understanding the IB DiplomaUnderstanding the IB Diploma
Understanding the IB Diploma
 
Rubric\'s Cube--Complimenting, Critiquing, and Challenging Student Work (NELB...
Rubric\'s Cube--Complimenting, Critiquing, and Challenging Student Work (NELB...Rubric\'s Cube--Complimenting, Critiquing, and Challenging Student Work (NELB...
Rubric\'s Cube--Complimenting, Critiquing, and Challenging Student Work (NELB...
 
Assessment 15 Annotated
Assessment 15 AnnotatedAssessment 15 Annotated
Assessment 15 Annotated
 
Evaluation in Education
Evaluation in EducationEvaluation in Education
Evaluation in Education
 
ACE+-+Blackboard+CBE+Research.pptx
ACE+-+Blackboard+CBE+Research.pptxACE+-+Blackboard+CBE+Research.pptx
ACE+-+Blackboard+CBE+Research.pptx
 
ACE+-+Blackboard+CBE+Research.pptx
ACE+-+Blackboard+CBE+Research.pptxACE+-+Blackboard+CBE+Research.pptx
ACE+-+Blackboard+CBE+Research.pptx
 

Mais de WCET

Infrastructure for digital_integration
Infrastructure for digital_integrationInfrastructure for digital_integration
Infrastructure for digital_integrationWCET
 
Student fraud
Student fraudStudent fraud
Student fraudWCET
 
Free range learners
Free range learnersFree range learners
Free range learnersWCET
 
Stretching LMS
Stretching LMSStretching LMS
Stretching LMSWCET
 
Process mapping
Process mappingProcess mapping
Process mappingWCET
 
Equity answer-wcet
Equity answer-wcetEquity answer-wcet
Equity answer-wcetWCET
 
Faculty peer review_rubric
Faculty peer review_rubricFaculty peer review_rubric
Faculty peer review_rubricWCET
 
Partnering for performance_harrison
Partnering for performance_harrisonPartnering for performance_harrison
Partnering for performance_harrisonWCET
 
Collaborating for student_success
Collaborating for student_successCollaborating for student_success
Collaborating for student_successWCET
 
Guidance for designing_blended
Guidance for designing_blendedGuidance for designing_blended
Guidance for designing_blendedWCET
 
Designing gen ed_for_distance
Designing gen ed_for_distanceDesigning gen ed_for_distance
Designing gen ed_for_distanceWCET
 
Using curriculum mapping
Using curriculum mappingUsing curriculum mapping
Using curriculum mappingWCET
 
Partnering for performance_harrisonb
Partnering for performance_harrisonbPartnering for performance_harrisonb
Partnering for performance_harrisonbWCET
 
Guidance for designing_blended_courses
Guidance for designing_blended_coursesGuidance for designing_blended_courses
Guidance for designing_blended_coursesWCET
 
Sate authorization from_a_z
Sate authorization from_a_zSate authorization from_a_z
Sate authorization from_a_zWCET
 
Taking online teaching_to_task
Taking online teaching_to_taskTaking online teaching_to_task
Taking online teaching_to_taskWCET
 
E tutoring collaborative_communities
E tutoring collaborative_communitiesE tutoring collaborative_communities
E tutoring collaborative_communitiesWCET
 
Effective course design
Effective course designEffective course design
Effective course designWCET
 
Effective coursedesign
Effective coursedesignEffective coursedesign
Effective coursedesignWCET
 
Videoconferencing creating the_virtual
Videoconferencing creating the_virtualVideoconferencing creating the_virtual
Videoconferencing creating the_virtualWCET
 

Mais de WCET (20)

Infrastructure for digital_integration
Infrastructure for digital_integrationInfrastructure for digital_integration
Infrastructure for digital_integration
 
Student fraud
Student fraudStudent fraud
Student fraud
 
Free range learners
Free range learnersFree range learners
Free range learners
 
Stretching LMS
Stretching LMSStretching LMS
Stretching LMS
 
Process mapping
Process mappingProcess mapping
Process mapping
 
Equity answer-wcet
Equity answer-wcetEquity answer-wcet
Equity answer-wcet
 
Faculty peer review_rubric
Faculty peer review_rubricFaculty peer review_rubric
Faculty peer review_rubric
 
Partnering for performance_harrison
Partnering for performance_harrisonPartnering for performance_harrison
Partnering for performance_harrison
 
Collaborating for student_success
Collaborating for student_successCollaborating for student_success
Collaborating for student_success
 
Guidance for designing_blended
Guidance for designing_blendedGuidance for designing_blended
Guidance for designing_blended
 
Designing gen ed_for_distance
Designing gen ed_for_distanceDesigning gen ed_for_distance
Designing gen ed_for_distance
 
Using curriculum mapping
Using curriculum mappingUsing curriculum mapping
Using curriculum mapping
 
Partnering for performance_harrisonb
Partnering for performance_harrisonbPartnering for performance_harrisonb
Partnering for performance_harrisonb
 
Guidance for designing_blended_courses
Guidance for designing_blended_coursesGuidance for designing_blended_courses
Guidance for designing_blended_courses
 
Sate authorization from_a_z
Sate authorization from_a_zSate authorization from_a_z
Sate authorization from_a_z
 
Taking online teaching_to_task
Taking online teaching_to_taskTaking online teaching_to_task
Taking online teaching_to_task
 
E tutoring collaborative_communities
E tutoring collaborative_communitiesE tutoring collaborative_communities
E tutoring collaborative_communities
 
Effective course design
Effective course designEffective course design
Effective course design
 
Effective coursedesign
Effective coursedesignEffective coursedesign
Effective coursedesign
 
Videoconferencing creating the_virtual
Videoconferencing creating the_virtualVideoconferencing creating the_virtual
Videoconferencing creating the_virtual
 

An assessment based_degree

  • 1. AN ASSESSMENT-BASED DEGREE November 1, 2012 WCET Annual Conference
  • 2. The Iron Triangle 2 Cost Quality Access
  • 3. Scalability of Content 3  Open Educational Resources: accessible to millions  Independent Study  Requires that learners be self-motivated
  • 4. Types of OER  Lecture notes Physics lecture  Videos of classroom lectures  Lessons designed for OER  Courses OpenStud y  Discussion groups Khan Academy Open University
  • 5. What is OER’s value?  Learning  Certificates But…  OER by itself does not typically award formal educational credit Why not?
  • 6. Academic credit 6  What is credit?  Assurance that someone knows something  The something must be appropriate for the particular academic program  To provide that assurance, both the someone and the something must be verified
  • 7. Decoupling assessment from the 7 classroom “What you know is more important than where or how you learned it.” Credit should be based on knowledge, not attendance Knowledge gained through independent study can be independently assessed
  • 8. Aspects of validity for credit by assessment 8  Identity verification  Assessment quality  Appropriateness of knowledge tested for a particular degree program  Scalability
  • 9. Identity verification 9 Ryan Ruppe Jeffery Turner Steve Winton
  • 10. Threats to validity--courses 10  Did the person actually go through the course?  Did the person do his/her own work?  Is the person who took the course the same person who is presenting the credential?
  • 11. Threats to validity-- 11 assessments  Is the person taking the assessment the same person who is claiming the knowledge?  Is the person claiming the knowledge the same person who is presenting the credential?
  • 12. Assessment quality 12 A good assessment  Measures knowledge of the subject  Does not measure irrelevant characteristics  Gives a person the same score regardless of which form is taken  Gives people of the same ability the same score
  • 13. Threats to assessment quality 13  Assessments may not measure quite the same content as the material studied  Not all things in the world labeled “Sociology” cover the same topics!  Assessments may not cover material in enough depth A 10-question quiz is unlikely to cover the equivalent of a college semester’s worth of content
  • 14. Threats to assessment quality 14  The assessment might not be scored consistently enough  Different instructors have different standards  Assessments might measure irrelevant characteristics  Unnecessarily complicated questions  Questions with “giveaway” answers  Trick questions
  • 15. Appropriateness of content 15  Match of assessment to OER  How close are the assessment specifications to the learning objectives of the OER material?  Match of assessment to credit-granting body  How close are the assessment specifications/learning objectives to what is taught at the institution where credit is sought?
  • 16. Efficient assessment  Machine-scored competency/proficiency exams can handle large numbers of examinees and be used for multiple OER sources  Machine-scored exams need not measure simply mindless regurgitation of facts  For some types of OER, more specific assessments may be needed  Portfolios for highly specialized content Cost of a 3-credit multiple-choice assessment:
  • 17. Scalability - Generalizability Less generalizable  Course final exams and homework  Third-party assessments designed for a specific course  Competency/proficiency assessments More generalizable
  • 18. Scalability – Large groups Less scalable  Individual assessments  Portfolios  Research papers  Oral examinations  Human-scored group assessments  Short answer questions  Essay questions  Machine-scored assessments  Multiple-choice exams  Machine-scored constructed response More scalable exams
  • 19. A model for low-cost education OER University
  • 20. What is Charter Oak State College?  Founded in 1973 in Connecticut  Enrollment about 2,000  Over 11,000 degrees awarded, with alumni from all 50 states and a dozen countries  Partnerships with military branches  Associate and Baccalaureate degrees  New England Association of Schools and Colleges accreditation
  • 21. What is Charter Oak State College?  Aggregation model - with Cornerstone and Capstone  Outcome assessment courses  Writing, research, program planning  Transfer credit  CBE, portfolio assessment, ACE and National CCRS, CCAP, institutionally reviewed training and certifications
  • 22. Student Profile CONCENTRATION PLAN OF STUDY (CPS) FORM Business Administration MINIMUM Number and Level of MINIMUM SUBJECT REQUIRED SOURCE: TEST OR INSTITUTION COURSE/TEST NO. & TITLE GRADE Credits Propose REQUIREMENTS CREDITS Lower Upper Accounting: 3 credits CLEP Financial Accounting Prop (3) Financial * Managerial * 3 credits StraighterLine Managerial Acct. B 3 Finance: 3 credits DSST Prin. Finance Prop (3) Principles * or Managerial * or Corporate Management: 3 credits Excelsior Coll. Organizational Behav Prop 3 Organizational Behavior Management: 3 credits Northwood U. MGT 230 Prin. Mgt. A 2.7 Intro/Principles Management* Marketing: 3 credits Northwood U. MKT 208 Prin. Mark. C+ 2.7 Principles of Marketing* Strategic Processes 3 credits COSC MGT 499 Strategic Prop 3 Capstone Course Management
  • 23. Program Planning Hi Karen, As per your request, I've included a list below of tests/ independent studies courses I am planning on taking for my degree. • Pending exams/courses: • Cornerstone course (IDS 101)- in progress • College Algebra - Straighterline, in progress • English Composition II - Straighterline, in progress • Mgmt Info Systems - DSST (area of concentration) • Environment & Humanity – DSST • *Business Ethics in Society - DSST (UL area of concentration) • Organizational Behavior - Excelsior Exam(UL area of concentration) • Principles of Public Speaking - DSST
  • 24. Class of 2011-12 & CBE 2011-12 Charter Oak State College Graduates: Average of Test Credit Graduates Average of Test Count Hours No Testing 310 64% Took 1 or more tests 176 5.23 17.64 36% Grand Total 486 5.23 17.64
  • 25. What Is Excelsior College?  Independent institution serving adult students and other non-traditional learners since 1971  Enrollment 34,000; alumni 141,000  Up to one-third of EC students are  Members of historically under-represented groups  Military or veterans  Average age of graduates: late 30s  Associate, Baccalaureate, and Masters degrees  Middle States accreditation
  • 26. What Is Excelsior College?  Aggregation model  EC online courses (available since 2004)  Two national exam series developed in house: ECE and UExcel  Transfer credit  Consistently ranked #1 or #2 in acceptance of credit from other accredited institutions  Other CBE, portfolio assessment, ACE and National CCRS, institutionally reviewed training and certifications  Largest pre-licensure nursing program in the country, entirely assessment based
  • 27. Excelsior College Exam-Based Degree Paths  New degree pathways emphasize Excelsior’s own CBE products, along with a single required Capstone course  Degree planning templates show suggested sequence of exams; students with transfer credit have wider choices  Supported Independent Study model is based on Open Courseware options reviewed and recommended for all exams  Initial degree templates for BS and BA in Liberal Studies and AS and BS in General Business
  • 28. Sample ASB Degree Template  (ETC ASB example)
  • 29. Infrastructure Needs 29  Common definitions of assessment-based learning among the Regional Accreditors  Access to Federal Financial Aid  Proposal:a demonstration program that lets a set of low cost assessment approaches prove their merits.  National Database of existing credential and training assessments
  • 30. A New Narrative 30  We need to add a chapter to the higher education biography.  The story begins with Socratic learning, moves to libraries, adds faculty, morphs universities, carves land grants from the wilderness, upscales adult education into Community Colleges, and invests in for-profits.  Now the story must add competency-based credentialing

Notas do Editor

  1. Restricting access to the “best” students can increase quality.Increasing cost can increase quality.How can we have high quality while allowing open access and containing costs? Answer: scalability and decoupling
  2. Assessment quality is not just about decoupled assessments. These aspects of quality apply in bricks-and-mortar and online courses too: anything that is used for academic credit needs to have good assessments. Note, though, that over the course of a semester, there are usually multiple assessments, so the individual assessments need not all be extremely rigorous: the aggregation of multiple assessments can lend reliability in cases in which a single assessment may not be highly reliable. However, in decoupled assessments, there is usually an “all your eggs in one basket” approach, so the basket needs to be very, very good.
  3. The big advantage courses have over decoupled assessments is that the first issue is usually not a problem!Formative assessments (ones given throughout a course) need not worry about depth—aggregated, though, they should cover everything.
  4. These two characteristics are the biggest pitfalls for the lower-stakes assessments usually seen as part of courses. Instructors often have no training in assessment.
  5. Appropriate here is on two levels. It’s important for the assessment to match the content of what examinees are expecting to learn. But it’s also important for the objectives to be valuable to credit-granting bodies. If I build a beautiful assessment for an OER course on water management that relates nicely to the course objectives, that assessment will still not be appropriate for someone seeking credit specifically for a degree in literature. Validity in this area often balances with validity in scalability: it’s often hard to do a great job on appropriateness (good matching) while at the same time providing a truly decoupled assessment
  6. Our typical student brings 5 transcripts to the table and may start a BA/BS program with about 60 credits completed. The Academic Advisor is the generic job at EC, and they specialize in helping students identify what they need.
  7. We began developing our current models to serve 1) an international agency and 2) the challenge of providing a $10K degree. But we don’t develop “exclusives.”