05/03/11 U.S. Supreme Court Filing (Regarding President Obama-StorAll Matter)

No. _____________________________________

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME
PETITIONER
V.

STOR-ALL ALFRED, LLC;
JUDGE JOHN ANDREW WEST/
HAMILTON COUNTY (OHIO) COURT OF COMMON PLEAS; AND
DOES 1 THROUGH 250
RESPONDENT(S)

IN RE VOGEL DENISE NEWSOME
ON PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY WRIT
TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

RESPONSE TO MARCH 17, 2011 AND APRIL 27, 2011
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES’ LETTERS –
IDENTIFYING EXTRAORDINARY WRIT(S) TO BE FILED AND
WRIT(S) UNDER ALL WRITS ACT TO BE FILED1

COMES NOW Petitioner, Vogel Denise Newsome – a/k/a Denise V. Newsome (―Newsome‖

and/or ―Petitioner Newsome‖) – WITHOUT WAIVING HER RIGHTS and ARGUMENTS/ISSUES

and DEFENSES raised and/or set forth in the October 9, 2010 “Emergency Motion to Stay;

Emergency Motion for Enlargement of Time and Other Relief The United States Supreme Court

Deems Appropriate To Correct The Legal Wrongs/Injustices Reported Herein” (―EM/ORS‖),

subsequent pleadings (i.e. which includes Petition for Extraordinary Writ [―PFEW‖]) submitted for

filing with the Supreme Court of the United States and provides this her Response To March 17,

2011 and April 27, 2011, Supreme Court Of The United States’ Letters – Identifying Extraordinary

Writ(s) To Be Filed and Writ(s) Under All Writs Act To Be Filed (―RT031711&042711SCL‖). This

1
BOLDFACE, ITALICS, UNDERLINE, etc. added for emphasis.

Page 1 of 113

instant filing in response to this Court‘s March 17, 2011 and April 27, 2001, letters is submitted in

that the information contained herein supports the EXTRAORDINARY, EXCEPTIONAL and

CRITICAL/EXIGENT circumstances involved. Said March 17, 2011 letter which states in part:

"The above-entitled petition for an extraordinary writ seeking
unspecified relief was received on March 17, 2011.

Please inform this office by letter, as soon as possible, what type of
extraordinary writ you are seeking to file, i.e. extraordinary writ of mandamus,
mandamus/prohibition, habeas corpus.

This office will retain all of the copies of the petition."

See EXHIBIT “1” – March 17, 2011 Letter attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set

forth in full herein. This Court‘s April 27, 2011 letter which states in part:

Your letter and attachments were received in this office on April 26,
2011, and are returned for the reason set forth in my letter dated March 17,
2011, copy enclosed.

You have failed to identify the type of extraordinary writ you are
seeking to file.

See EXHIBIT “44” – April 27, 2011 Letter attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set

forth in full herein. In further support thereof, Newsome REITERATES the following

EXTRAORDINARY Writ(s) and Writ(s) governed under the All Writs Act

(provided in her April 22, 2011 submittal) are being sought to be filed:

1) Original Writ 2) Writ of Conspiracy
3) Writ of Course 4) Writ of Detinue
5) Writ of Entry 6) Writ of Exigi Facias
7) Writ of Formedon 8) Writ of Injunction
9) Writ of Mandamus 10) Writ of Possession
11) Writ of Praecipe 12) Writ of Protection
13) Writ of Recaption 14) Writ of Prohibition
15) Writ of Review 16) Writ of Supersedeas
17) Writ of Supervisory Control 18) Writ of Securitate Pacis
19) Extraterritorial Writs

Rather than bring separate actions, Newsome believes that the statutes/laws will sustain that facts,

evidence and legal conclusions provided in this matter that the Extraordinary Writs/Writs provide

―causes of like nature, or relative to the same question‖ and that ―actions brought by Newsome

Page 2 of 113

against different Respondent(s) provide similar defenses‖ and consolidation requirements for

purposes of EXPEDITION of matters, avoiding UNNECESSARY COSTS or DELAYS as witnessed

so far in the Supreme Court of the United States‘ handling of this matter in its ATTEMPTS to

deprive Newsome rights and EQUAL PROTECTION, EQUAL PRIVILEGES and IMMUNITIES

and DUE PROCESS OF LAWS in, it appears, to get her to only identify ―ONE‖ Extraordinary Writ

when there are SEVERAL involved in this legal action as set forth herein and in the Petition For

Extraordinary Writ (―PFEW‖) and EM/ORS to which this instant RT031711&042711SCL sustains.

Decisions (well OVER 100 years) of this Court will sustain the need to consolidate the Extraordinary

Writ(s)/Writs under the All Writs Act contained herein – and/or known to this Court to correct the

legal wrongs complained of herein:

Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. Hillmon, 12 S.Ct. 909 (U.S.Kan.,1892) -
Under Rev.St. § 921, 28 U.S.C.A. § 734, providing that ―causes of a like nature,
or relative to the same question,‖ may be consolidated, for the purpose of
avoiding unnecessary costs or delays, ―whenever it appears reasonable to do so,‖
actions . . . by one plaintiff against different defendants, in which the defenses
are the same, may be consolidated, but the causes of action must remain distinct,
requiring separate verdicts, and no defendant must be deprived of any right
material to his defense.

Bowen v. Chase, 94 U.S. 812 (U.S.N.Y.,1876) - Actions depending between the
same parties, and upon the same questions in controversy may be consolidated.

Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc., 96 S.Ct. 1048 (U.S.Ohio,1976) - A suit
against an employer for breach of collective bargaining agreement and a breach
of contract suit against the labor union may be joined in one action.

Baltimore & O.S.W.R. Co. v. U.S., 31 S.Ct. 368 (U.S.Ohio,1911) - The federal
circuit court may properly consolidate. . . several actions brought by the United
States against a carrier to recover the penalty prescribed by . . . for violations of
its requirement . . .

Bowen v. Chase, 94 U.S. 812 (U.S.N.Y.,1876) - Actions depending between the
same parties, and upon the same questions in controversy may be consolidated.

If the Supreme Court of the United States is DENYING

Newsome the right to bring these Extraordinary Writs and Writs under

the All Writs Act, it needs to state its reasons for FAILURE to comply

Page 3 of 113

with the statutes/laws governing said matters and why its handling of

this matter appears to be CONTRARY to decisions of this Court.

Furthermore, whether this Court is attempting to OBSTRUCT justice in its handling of this matter?

Thus, further REITERATING this Court advising of ALL “Conflict Of Interests” that exist (if any)

in its handling of this matter. Newsome further states the following:

1. This instant pleading is submitted in good faith and is not submitted
for purposes of delay, harassment, hindering proceedings, embarrassment,
obstructing the administration of justice, vexatious litigation, increasing the cost of
litigation, etc. and is hereby filed to protect the rights of the Petitioner/Newsome and
to provide the Supreme Court of the United States with a response to its March 17,
2011 letter.

2. This instant pleading and legal action has been timely brought in
accordance with the Rules and statutes/laws governing said matters and in accordance
with this Court‘s March 17, 2011 and April 27, 2011, letters executed by Ruth Jones
in the Clerk‘s Office on behalf of this Court and/or William K. Suter.

3. While this Court requested that Newsome provide a “letter” she
believes the submittal of a response in form of pleading is appropriate and applicable
out of concerns of the DILATORY tactics as well as further unlawful/illegal practices
by members in this Court‘s Clerk‘s Office to attempt to USURP authority – i.e. little
“Indians” wanting to be Chief and perform the role of the Justices of this Court;
moreover, the DESPARATE attempts that may have been made by this Court in
efforts to AID and ABET in the COVER-UP of the CRIMINAL and CIVIL WRONGS
of its employees in efforts to shield/mask the ILLEGAL ANIMUS of President Barack
Obama, his Administration and others leveled against Newsome. While it appears
this Court may have been attempting to avoid being provided sufficient information
to aid in the handling of this matter and advising Newsome that ―Motion for Leave‖
would now not be required, this instant RT031711&042711SCL is hereto provided
for purposes of clarifying and aiding this Court in the handling of this matter – i.e.
providing information pertinent to March 17, 2011 request and reiterating pertinent
information in the Motion for Leave Newsome previously provided this Court.

4. This instant RT031711&042711SCL is also filed because Newsome
believes it is of PUBLIC/WORLDWIDE interest for citizens as well as Foreign
Leaders/Nations to see just what she has had to endure in seeking justice for the legal
wrongs complained of in the Petition for Extraordinary Writ (―PFEW‖) and
EM/ORS. Moreover, concerns that the Courts and United States Government may
have moved to COVER-UP the criminal acts/civil violations leveled against
Newsome and/or citizen(s) of the United States in RETALIATION of having
EXPOSED the CORRUPTION in the United States Government/Government
Officials.

Page 4 of 113

5. THE UNITED STATES CITIZENS, PUBLIC/WORLD NEEDS TO
KNOW WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON AND WHAT TERRORIST/SUPREMACIST/
RACIST GROUP(S) APPEAR TO BE IN CONTROL OF THE UNITED STATES
GOVERNMENT – It is time for the Barack Obama Regime to GO – STEP DOWN!!
As President Barack Obama has recently requested Foreign Leaders – i.e. for
instance, Egypt’s President Hosni Mubarak and Lybia’s Colonel Muammar el-
Qaddafi. See EXHIBITS “2” and “3” respectively– Articles regarding President
Obama‘s request that Foreign Leaders step down attached hereto and incorporated by
reference as if set forth in full herein.

Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc., 123 S.Ct. 1057
(U.S.,2003) - Crime of “coercion” is separate from extortion and
involves the use of force or threat of force to restrict another's
freedom of action.

TERRORISM: The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or
an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating
or coercing societies or governments often for ideological or political reasons.2

DOMESTIC TERRORISM: Terrorism that occurs primarily within the territorial
jurisdiction of the United States. [18 USCA § 2331(5)] Terrorism that is carried
out against one‘s own government or fellow citizens.3

INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM: Terrorism that occurs primarily outside the territorial
jurisdiction of the United States, or that transcends national boundaries by the
means in which it is carried out, the people it is intended to intimidate, or the
place where the perpetrators operate to seek asylum. 4

TERRORIST:
a) One who engage in acts or an act of terrorism. 5
b) Somebody who uses violence or the threat of violence,
especially bombing, kidnapping, and assassination, to
intimidate, often for political purposes.6
TERRORIZE:
a) To fill or overpower, with terror; terrify.
b) Coerce by intimidation or fear.7
c) Motivate somebody by violence to intimidate or coerce
somebody with violence or the threat of violence.8
d) Make somebody very fearful to fill somebody with feelings of
intense fear over a period of time.
TERRORIST - a radical who employs terror as a political weapon; usually
organizes with other terrorists in small cells; often uses religion as a cover for
terrorist activities. (EMPHASIS ADDED).

ACT OF TERRORISM, TERRORISM, TERRORIST ACT - the calculated use of
violence (or the threat of violence) against civilians in order to attain goals that

2
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (4 th Edition).
3
Black‘s Law Dictionary (8th Edition).
4
Id.
5
The American Heritage. . .
6
Encarta World English Dictionary (1999).
7
The American Heritage. . .
8
Encarta World. . .

Page 5 of 113

are political or religious or ideological in nature; this is done through intimidation
or coercion or instilling fear.

RADICAL CELL, TERRORIST CELL - a cell of terrorists (usually 3 to 5 members);
"to insure operational security the members of adjacent terrorist cells usually
don't know each other or the identity of their leadership."

SUPREMACIST:
1) A person who believes in or advocates the supremacy of a particular group, esp. a
racial group.9
2) One who believes that a certain group is or should be supreme. 10
3) Somebody who holds the view that a particular group is innately superior to
others and therefore, is entitled to dominate them.11
SUPREMACY: A position of superiority or authority over all others.12/13

6. Foreign Leaders are NOT going to be deceived.
They are aware of such SUPREMACIST and TERRORIST groups that are running
the United States Government. For example, see the Interview Transcript with Iran
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad wherein said knowledge is made known -
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39210911/ns/world_news-mideast/n_africa.14
Knowledge confirming statements in Newsome‘s July 13, 2010 Email.
9
Random House Webster‘s Unabridged Dictionary (2nd Edition).
10
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (4 th Edition).
11
Encarta World English Dictionary (1999).
12
Encarta World. . .
13
This can be said of this instant lawsuit. If it had not been for Newsome‘s patience, diligence, research, etc. the United
States Supreme Court as well as United States citizens would not be aware of the TERRORISTIC acts and CONSPIRACY that has
been orchestrated and carried out under the Leadership/Direction of Baker Donelson, its client (Liberty Mutual) and others against
African-Americans and/or people of color; as well as smaller countries/nations. Why? Because this instant action will EXPOSE just
how subtle/elusive such SUPREMACIST/TERRORIST in not wanting to be detected and their intelligence/experience/expertise in
covering up their RACIST/DISCRMINATORY/ PREJUDICIAL motives/agenda – i.e. exchanging the white hoods for business suits
and judicial robes, etc. to AVOID detection. See EXHIBIT “I” – DAVID DUKE/KU KLUX KLAN attached hereto and incorporated
by reference as if set forth in full herein.
14
Transcript: U.S. has 'hostility against our people,' Ahmadinejad says

. . .And-- all-- these years, they-- stood against our people. They continued hostilities, and they cooperated with all of our
enemies. President Obama said, "We are going to make it-- to make it up." And we welcomed that idea and position. I sent a message
for him after his election. Of course, I received no answer. He just gave a general response. And that is not considered a response to my
message. We think maybe President Obama wants to do something, but there are pressures-- pressure groups in the United States who do
not allow him to do so. Even if he wants to do something, apparently there are certain groups who do not allow him to do it.

Andrea Mitchell: You're suggesting that President Obama—

President Ahmadinejad: We think they are –

Andrea Mitchell: --doesn't have-- doesn't have-- the-- as Commander in Chief and leader of the United States does not have
the decision-making power over what he does?

President Ahmadinejad: Do you really think President Obama can do anything he wishes to?

Andrea Mitchell: Within-- within the—

President Ahmadinejad: He does not—

Andrea Mitchell: --the constructs of the United States Constitution. But what would you like to hear from President Obama?
And what would you like to say to him?

Page 6 of 113

Foreign Leaders/Countries are aware that the
7.
United States Citizens DO NOT elect the President/Vice
President of the United States – Electoral Colleges do. President Barack
Obama was placed in the United States White House for DECEPTIVE purposes and
all is ―COMING OUT IN THE WASH!!‖

8. FOREIGN LEADERS/CITIZENS are NOT DECEIVED. They have
been made aware of the WILLIE LYNCH practices and realize that the United States
DOES NOT have the likes of Martin Luther King Jr., Malcolm X or Medgar Evers in
the White House. NEITHER is that the likes of a NELSON MANDELA in
the United States White House – i.e. Blacks WILLING/DETERMINED to put
their lives on the line to assure FREEDOM and EQUALITY for ALL. Instead,
products of the WILLIE LYNCH practices – United States President Barack Obama,
United States Attorney General Eric Holder and President of the NAACP Benjamin
Jealous - have been placed on DISPLAY as the NEW FACES of the African-
American/Black male. See EXHIBIT “4” – Excerpt from the October PowerPoint
Presentation entitled, “Clean Out Congress 2010 – Americans Take BACK Your
Country/Government – Come November 2010 Vote OUT The Incumbents Career
Politicians” attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full
herein.

9. It is of PUBLIC/WORLDWIDE interest for citizens and Foreign
Nations/Leaders to see DEMOCRACY at work and see FIRST-HAND how the
JUDICIAL system works in one of the MOST POWER COUNTRIES in the world.
Moreover, how the Respondents and United States Government has resorted to
CRIMINAL acts for purposes of OPPRESSION, THREATS, HARASSMENT,
BLACKMAIL, EXTORTION, etc. against Newsome and/or citizens who engage in
protected activities – i.e. file complaints EXPOSING Human/Civil Rights violations,
Discrimination, Retaliation, Terrorism/Supremacist/Racism, etc.

Thank God, NATIONS – such as China and others - are
coming out to address the HUMAN RIGHTS and
CORRUPTION in the United States Government. Stands as
Newsome requested in her October 2010 PowerPoint
Presentation. See EXHIBIT “5” – 04/11/11 Article ―China
Report Criticizes U.S. Human Rights Record‖ attached
hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full
herein. See EXHIBIT “6” October 2010 PowerPoint
Presentation entitled, “Clean Out Congress 2010 – Americans
Take BACK Your Country/Government – Come November
2010 Vote OUT The Incumbents Career Politicians” attached

President Ahmadinejad: The Constitution is already on the [unintel]. What about the political scene? The reality on the
ground? Is he able to do everything he wishes to? Personally, it's not true. There are different political group, there are a lo—
different lobbyist pressure groups, and more important, there are Zionists there. We say, if he wants to do something, there are
certain groups who do not allow him to do so.

Page 7 of 113

herein.

It is about time for Foreign Countries/Leaders and their
citizens let the United States know that they have had enough
of its CORRUPTION and INTERFERENCE. See EXHIBIT
“7” – Meetings with Foreign Leaders attached hereto and
incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein.

10. United States President Barack Obama came out PUBLICLY and
requested that Foreign Leaders – such as for instance Egypt‘s President Hosni
Mubarak and Libya‘s Colonel Muammar Gaddafi - STEP DOWN. See EXHIBITS
“2” and “3” respectively attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth
in full herein. Now that Newsome has brought this legal action ADDRESSING THE
CORRUPTION, CONSPIRACIES and COVER-UP along with supporting evidence
as well as provided Exhibits/Appendices to sustain the EM/ORS and PFEW, ―WILL
PRESIDENT OBAMA and HIS ADMINISTRATION STEP DOWN?

11. The United States has a President (Barack Obama) who has recently
come under question regarding his CITIZENSHIP. Even under such SCRUTINY,
President Obama CANNOT and or WILL NOT produce his ―Birth Certificate.‖
Instead, information regarding a ―Certificate of LIVE Birth‖ NOT ―BIRTH
Certificate‖ is released to the PUBLIC. Furthermore, it appears that President Obama
is relying upon his Lawyers/Advisors (i.e. such as Baker, Donelson, Bearman,
Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC (―Baker Donelson‖)) who have been shown to be
CORRUPT!! See EXHIBIT “8” – regarding Birther issue attached hereto and
incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein. Information which is
PERTINENT and RELEVANT because it goes to the United States President Barack

Obama‘s and his Administration‘s CREDIBILITY!!!
Which is
CRUCIAL and of PUBLIC/WORLDWIDE interest!
Newsome believes it is also IMPORTANT for the
PUBLIC/WORLD to see how Lawyers/Advisors for the
United States President handle such issues. Newsome‘s
experience with the likes of Baker Donelson and/or
Respondents in this matter is that they NEVER produce ANY
evidence to REBUT that is presented. ALL Respondents ever
do is provide MERE ―WORDS‖ by way of rebuttal and
ATTEMPT to MISLEAD the FACTFINDER away from the
TRUTH!! See for instance EXHIBIT “9” – Obama‘s
Response to Birther Issue attached hereto and incorporated by
reference as if set forth in full herein. JUST WORDS –
Surely if his Administration was willing to provide the
―Certificate of Live Birth,‖ President Obama should have a
Birth Certificate. It is the BIRTH CERTIFICATE that the
CITIZENS of the United States want to see.

Page 8 of 113

PERTINENT FACTS THAT MAY BE RELEVANT TO UNDERSTAND HOW
MATTERS MAY BE RELATED TO THIS INSTANT LEGAL ACTION:

a) Newsome‘s FIRST response to this Court‘s March 17, 2011 letter was
submitted on or about April 22, 2011 (EMPHASIS ADDED). See
EXHIBITS “42” – United States Postal Service Mailing Receipts and
“43” – April 22, 2011 Cover Letter submitted to the attention of Chief
Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and William K. Suter (Clerk) respectively,
attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein.

b) On or about April 22, 2011 (EMPHASIS ADDED), United States
President Barack Obama allegedly advises one of his many attorneys
(Judith Corley) to obtain ―CERTIFIED‖ copies (EMPHASIS ADDED) of
his ―original certificate of live birth‖ - stating in part:

I am writing to request two certified copies of my original
certificate of live birth. With this letter, I hereby authorize my
personal counsel, Ms. Judith Corley of Perkins Coie in
Washington, D.C., to act on my behalf in providing any
additional information or paying any fees required by the
Department of Health to fulfill my request. Ms. Corley is also
authorized to make any necessary arrangements for delivery of
the certified copies from your office. . . .

See EXHIBIT “50” – 04/22/11 Letter from President Obama to Loretta
J. Fuddy (Director of Health, State of Hawaii – Department of Health)
attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein.

c) From the April 22, 2011 (FRIDAY), letters of President Obama and his
attorney (Judith Corley) they are requesting that Government
Official(s) VIOLATE policies in place to extend to him
SPECIAL FAVORS - for instance stating:
"As you know, several years ago, my client requested a
certified copy of his birth certificate and received, pursuant to
the policy and practice of the Hawaii Department of Health, a
Certification of Live Birth, sometimes referred to as a "short-
form" or abbreviated birth certificate. This Certification of
Live Birth is, of course, legally sufficient evidence of birth in
the State of Hawaii. Moreover, it is my understanding that it
is, and has been, the Department of Health's longstanding
policy and practice to provide only the "short-form" version
when a certified copy of a birth certificate is requested.

We understand that the Department of Health has adopted this
policy for sound administrative reasons. However, we are
writing to request a waiver of the Department of Health's
policy, so that my client can obtain two certified copies of his
original, "long form" birth certificate. Waiver of the
Department's policy in this instance would allow my client to
make a certified copy of his original birth certificate publicly
available and would also relieve the burden currently being

Page 9 of 113

placed on the Department of Health by the numerous inquiries
it receives from the media and others relating to my client's
birth record."

See EXHIBIT “50” – April 22, 2011 correspondence of President
Obama and his counsel (Corley) attached hereto and incorporated as if set
forth in full herein. The State of Hawaii requires the completion of
"REQUEST FOR CERTIFIED COPY OF BIRTH RECORD." Was
President Obama required to complete this Form? See EXHIBIT “53” –
Request attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in
full herein.

d) If indeed President Obama wanted a copy of his ―BIRTH‖ Certificate
and/or ―Certificate of Live Birth‖ the State of Hawaii has a form that is to
be used. Such requests are to be SUBMITTED TO:

State Department of Health
Office of Health Status Monitoring
Issuance/Vital Statistics Section
P.O. Box 3378
Honolulu, HI 96801

The State of Hawaii provides information on their website. Furthermore,
has provided ACCESS to form to be completed and submitted.
Nevertheless, President Obama merely relied upon an April 22, 2011
letter – rather than the REQUIRED Form – to obtain a copy of the April
25, 2011 release of Certification of Live Birth.

e) On or about April 25, 2011 (EMPHASIS ADDED), the Supreme Court of
the United States receives Newsome‘s April 22, 2011, Response to March
17, 2011 Supreme Court of the United States’ Letter. See EXHIBIT
“42” attached hereto.

f) On or about April 25, 2011 (Monday) (EMPHASIS ADDED), the
Governor for the State of Mississippi – Haley Barbour – announced that
he would not be running for President in 2012. See EXHIBIT “55” -
Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour Won't Run
For President attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if
set forth in full herein. What a COINCIDENT that such a MAJOR
announcement comes on the SAME date that the Supreme Court of the
United States received Newsome‘s April 22, 2011 submittal. A potential
United States Presidential Candidate that may be linked to Baker
Donelson and Ku Klux Klan ties:

But the 63-year-old southerner with a syrupy drawl also faced
unique obstacles that threatened to distract attention from his
campaign message. As he began his campaign, he had to
defend comments that suggested a lack of sensitivity about
segregationist activities in his home town during the 1950s

Page 10 of 113

and about contemporary efforts to honor an early Ku Klux
Klan leader with a commemorative license plate tied to the
150th anniversary of the Civil War.

Governor Haley Barbour (Republican) who also appears on the ―LIST‖ of
positions that Obama‘s legal counsel/advisor Baker Donelson claims
ENTITLEMENT to – ―Governor of Mississippi.‖ See EXHIBITS “10”
and “27” respectively attached hereto and incorporated herein by

g) On or about April 25, 2011 (Monday) (EMPHASIS ADDED) the State of
Hawaii Department of Health PROMPTLY releases an ALLEGED
certified copy of President Obama‘s Certificate of Live Birth. See
EXHIBIT “48” – Certificate of Live Birth information attached hereto
and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein. You may want
to note the following:

i. President Obama’s “alleged” Certificate of Live Birth
was PURPOSEFULLY placed and reproduced on
paper to “MATCH‖ the Background of Certificate of
Live Birth. Interesting how a ―REPRODUCED‖ copy can
have the ―SAME‖ Background as the Certificate. WOW
the wonders one can do to MANIPULATE a document.

In fact, President Obama‘s counsel/advisor Baker
Donelson also laid claims to ENTITLEMENT to
positions such as Chief Counsel, Acting Director,
and Acting Deputy Director of United States
Citizenship & Immigration Services within the
United States Department of Homeland
Security. See EXHIBITS “10” and “27” attached
herein. Baker Donelson ONLY AFTER Newsome’s
going public having information SCRUBBED from
Internet.

ii. When documents, such as President Obama‘s “Certificate
of Live Birth,” are CERTIFIED copies, they are to
CONTAIN the ―OATH‖ of person preparing/producing
document “As Well As” the “SEAL.” This
information is MISSING from President
Obama’s 2008 release as well as his recent
April 27, 2011 Release. Therefore, these documents
ARE NOT ―Authentic‖ nor can be received as
―LEGALLY‖ sufficient. Even with an embossed seal,
may have been used, this is a Certificate and President
Obama and his counsel FAILED to REVEAL the seal as

Page 11 of 113

well as whether or not the PROPER signature(S) if more
than one is required by Hawaii laws was provided.

For instance, Vital Records such as the ―Certificate of
Live Birth‖ may have a statement worded such as:

WARNING: This certificate is not valid
if it has been altered in any way
whatsoever or if it does not bear the
raised seal of the office of issuance.

If you look at the April 27, 2011 ―Certificate of Live
Birth‖ provided by President Barack Obama, notice that
while ―Alvin T. Onaka, Ph.D.‖ provides a ―STAMP‖
stating, ―I CERTIFY THIS IS A TRUE COPY OR
ABSTRACT OF THE RECORD ON FILE IN THE
HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH‖ –
there is NO State ―SEAL‖ and ―DATE‖ stamp is
questionable (i.e. for instance look at the ―2‖ in the 25
and then look at the ―2‖ in the year 2011. Why could
―State Registrar‖ not simply ―WRITE‖ the date
certifying when executed.

Notice how the ―LOWER PORTION‖ of ―Certificate of
Live Birth‖ is missing information which may contain
―FORM number‖ of this document, etc. as well as
certification information required by Department of
Health Official when this ALLEGED Certificate of
Live Birth was filed (i.e. in 1961)

iii. How CONVENIENT it is that the ALLEGED doctor that
was the Attendant and/or witness to President Obama‘s
birth is DECEASED.

iv. TYPEWRITER was used to prepare document; however,
NOTICE that the dates of ―8-7-61‖ and ―8-8-61‖ are
HANDWRITTEN. Then for the ―Local Reg.‖ date is
―STAMPED‖ as well as the date for ―Reg. General.‖

Now look at another “Certificate of Live Birth”
provided for a person allegedly named ―ALAN‖
claiming to also have been born in Hawaii. All
―PERTINENT‖ information is entered it appears with
use of ―TYPEWRITER‖ – including dates for those
signing document. Notice that DATES for those
signing ―Alan‘s‖ Certificate of Live Birth appear to
have all been present and the matter taken care on the

Page 12 of 113

same date of “6 Sept 63” and then was forwarded on to
the ―Reg. General‖ who provided ―Date Accepted‖ as
“SEP 10 1963.” Note VARIATION in appearance of
date stamp used (EMPHASIS ADDED).

See EXHIBIT “54” – Hawaii Birth
documents retrieved from the Internet
attached hereto and incorporated by

Looking at another “Certificate of Live Birth”
provided with President Obama‘s adjacent, all
―PERTINENT‖ information is entered it appears with
use of ―TYPEWRITER‖ – including dates for those
signing document. Notice that DATES for those
signing Certificate of Live Birth appear to have all been
present and the matter taken care on the same date of
“20 Feb 61” and then was forwarded on to the ―Reg.
General‖ who provided ―LATER‖ date other than that
of Local Reg. Then there is a Certification clause
which appears to state:

"THIS CERTIFIES THAT THE ABOVE IS A
TRUE AND ___ (sic – illegible) COPY OF
THE ORIGINAL RECORD ON FILE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE HEALTH STATISTICS.
HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF
HEALTH.

Being executed by TWO government officials.
Nevertheless, President Obama gets SPECIAL attention
and treatment and document appears to be in the custody
of only ONE person (Alvin T. Oneka).

v. While Newsome has no children, her concerns as to how
the Obama Certificate of Live Birth filing was handled.
For instance, Obama‘s mother‘s alleged signature was
provided on or about 8-7-61 and the Attendant‘s on or
about 8-8-61 – the same date that it was provided to the
Department of Health. So did the HOSPITAL submit his
alleged document for filing or did the Attendant do a
HAND DELIVERY and, if so, was this the doctor‘s
normal way of handling business for births witnessed.
Furthermore, the HOSPITAL should also have RECORDS
of BIRTHS on the date President Obama is alleged to
have been born there. A map of Hawaii is attached at
EXHIBIT “52” of this instant filing and is incorporated
herein by reference.

Page 13 of 113

vi. How CONVENIENT it was for President
Barack Obama to get Loretta J. Fuddy
(Director of Health) who was CONFIRMED on
or about March 29, 2011 – See EXHIBIT “51” -
Senate Confirms Topping, Fuddy, Lim attached hereto and
incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein. Not
ONLY that, LESS THAN A MONTH in Office and
Fuddy clearly went AGAINST policies and procedures to
accommodate President Obama and his
attorney(s)/counsel/advisor(s), stating:

"As director of health for the state of Hawaii, I
have the legal authority to approve the process
by which copies of such records are made.
Through that authority, in recognition of your
status as president of the United States, I am
making an exception to the current departmental
policy which is to issue a computer-generated
certified copy," she wrote.

See EXHIBIT “49” – Obama Birth Certificate Moved to
More Secure Location Months Ago attached hereto and
incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein.
Providing a hard copy rather than the ―computer-
generated‖ copies which may leave one wondering
whether this may be the reason why President Obama
released the April 27, 2011, ―Certificate of Live Birth‖
document – i.e. which appears may be a FAKE
and FORGED from another document.
Moreover, that FAILURE to provide a
computer-generated copy may be due to
President Obama and his attorneys/counselors/
advisors have NOT been able to figure out how
to get around that –i.e. in that the computer may
not be able to generate a document from
information that is NOT there.
vii. On or about April 27, 2011 (Thursday) (EMPHASIS
ADDED), President Obama released document alleged to
be his ―Certificate of Live Birth.‖ See EXHIBIT “49” –
Articles on release attached hereto and incorporated by

viii. On or about April 27, 2011 (EMPHASIS ADDED) the
Supreme Court of the United States returned Newsome‘s
April 22, 2011 Response to March 17, 2011 Supreme
Court of the United States’ Letter. See EXHIBIT “44” –

Page 14 of 113

04/27/11 Supreme Court of the United States‘ letter
executed by Ruth Jones attached hereto and incorporated
by reference as if set forth in full herein.

The record evidence will SUSTAIN that this Court has
been TIMELY, PROPERLY and ADQUATELY
requested to provide Newsome with information
regarding ―Conflict of Interests.‖ Such request being
made in GOOD-FAITH in that President
Obama’s attorney/counsel/advisors (Baker
Donelson) have made known their TIES/
RELATIONSHIPS to KEY judicial officials in
which the Supreme Court of the United States has
been NAMED as well as President Obama since
being in office has NOMINATED two (2) Justices
(i.e. Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan) to this
Court which have been CONFIRMED and are
presently serving. Moreover, record evidence
will SUSTAIN that Baker Donelson is sure to see
that it is on Judicial NOMINATION Committees.
See for instance Exhibit “18” of EM/ORS incorporated
herein by reference as if set forth in full herein.
Furthermore, EXHIBITS “10” and “27” respectively of
this instant RT031711&042711SCL which provides the
following information in part:

Chief of Staff of the Supreme Court of the United
States; Administrative Assistant to the Chief Justice
of the United States; . . . United States Circuit Court
of Appeals Judge; United States District Court
Judges; United States Attorneys; Presidents of State
and Local Bar Associations

12. President Obama in producing not only the recently
released April 25, 2011 “Certificate of Live Birth” and the 2008
“Certification of Live Birth,” has basically opened himself up to
“SUBPOENA(s)”, etc. and right of CITIZENS of the United States to
“Challenge” authenticity of the document he produced. He is a
sitting United States President who took an “OATH” of Office.

13. From media information, it appears President Obama is playing up
what may be a FRAUDULENTLY produced ―Certificate of Live Birth.‖ Going as
far as to make an appearance on Oprah Winfrey – one of President
Obama‘s TOP/KEY supporters and one that has been known to present and
entertain CRIMINALS on her show even going as far as to promote through her
―BOOK CLUB‖ works of Authors producing false/fraudulent and/or misleading

Page 15 of 113

information. Now it appears that Oprah Winfrey may be using her
PLATFORM and CELEBRITY STATUS to help promote the most
recent CORRUPTION and COVER-UP of the United States
Government in the handling of President Barack Obama‘s Birth
Certificate.

14. It is a GOOD THING President Obama and
Michelle Obama were NOT invited to the “Royal Wedding”
of Prince William and Kate on April 29, 2011. Newsome
knows she would NOT want a President claiming to be the
FIRST alleged African-American President of the United
States who appears to be engaged in the VERY practices
which have OPPRESSED and DISCRIMINATED against
African-Americans and/or people of color.
15. It is an INSULT and EMBARASSMENT that the United States
Government has allowed such firms as Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell &
Berkowitz, PC (―Baker Donelson‖) to assume KEY and CRITICAL positions for
purposes of CREATING a CORRUPT and TERRORIST/SUPREMACIST
government to INFLICT pain and suffering on its citizens and upon Foreign Nations
WITHOUT just cause to do so. Baker Donelson acknowledging their people in
PROMINENT positions as:

Chief of Staff to the President of the United States; United States Secretary of State;
United States Senate Majority Leader; Members of the
United States Senate; Members of the United States
House of Representatives; Director of the Office of
Foreign Assets Control for United States;
Department of Treasury; Director of the Administrative
Office of the United States; Chief Counsel, Acting Director, and Acting Deputy
Director of United States Citizenship & Immigration
Services within the United States Department of
Homeland Security; Majority and Minority Staff
Director of the Senate Committee on Appropriations;
Member of United States President‘s Domestic Policy
Council; Counselor to the Deputy Secretary for the United States Department of
Chief of Staff of the Supreme Court
HHS;

of the United States; Administrative
Assistant to the Chief Justice of the

Page 16 of 113

United States; Deputy under Secretary of International Trade for the
United States Department of Commerce; Ambassador to Japan; Ambassador to Turkey;
Ambassador to Saudi Arabia; Ambassador to the Sultanate of Oman; Governor of
Tennessee; Governor of Mississippi; Deputy Governor and Chief of Staff for the
Governor of Tennessee; Commissioner of Finance & Administration (Chief Operating
Officer) - State of Tennessee; Special Counselor to the Governor of Virginia;

United States Circuit Court of
Appeals Judge; United States
District Court Judges; United
States Attorneys; Presidents of
State and Local Bar Associations
However, upon Newsome‘s going PUBLIC and WORLDWIDE, Baker Donelson has
had this information SCRUBBED from the Internet. However, NOT before Newsome
could RETRIEVE such information to sustain its DOMINENCE and CONTROL in
HIGH POSITIONS – See EXHIBIT “10” attached hereto and incorporated by

Baker Donelson being a law firm which has opposed and REPEATEDLY engaged in
criminal/civil wrongs leveled against Newsome for purposes of destroying her life as
well as other citizens. Furthermore, it is an EMBARASSMENT and INSULT to
the United States when it has been shown to the PUBLIC and WORLD that
such a CORRUPT law firm as Baker Donelson, its client (LIBERTY
MUTUAL INSURANCE) and those who conspire with them are
REPEATEDLY giving a SHELLACKING and BEAT DOWN in lawsuits
involving Newsome that they have to RESORT to criminal acts – i.e.
KIDNAPPING, BRIBERY, BLACKMAIL, EMBEZZLEMENT,
EXTORTION, etc. in efforts of obtaining an UNDUE/UNLAWFUL/
ILLEGAL advantage for itself and those they represent and/or conspire
with.

IMPORTANT TO NOTE
Citizens may want to know why the United States is LOSING the Wars/Battles
in IRAN, IRAQ, AFGHANISTAN – Look at the law firm (i.e. Baker Donelson)
Government Officials may receive counsel from. A Law Firm that
PROMOTES/INCORPORATES and SUPPORTS and IMPOSES Terrorist/
Supremacist/Racist behavior on those they want to CONTROL and OPPOSES or
SPEAK OUT AGAINST THEM such as Newsome.

Recently a mother (Mary Tillman) of the late Football great (Pat
Tillman) came out blasting the Obama Administration for

Page 17 of 113

retaining retired General Stanley McChrystal for Co-Chair of
the ―Joining Forces‖ Program. See EXHIBIT “11” – Article
regarding Mary Tillman attached hereto and incorporated by
reference as if set forth in full herein. What this mother may not
know, is that this is not ONLY President Barack Obama but his
Lawyers/Advisors (i.e. Baker Donelson) at work. They throw
out people and/or just merely move them to another post;
however, the PERPETRATORS/CONSPIRATORS and
CRIMINALS are ALWAYS basically the same regardless
which ADMINISTRATION (Republican or Democrat) is in the
White House. Baker Donelson and their COHORTS are
ROOTED DEEPLY in the Government, Government
Corruption, and the COVER-UP by the Government. So when
CITIZENS/PUBLIC hear for instance that there is ―Change‖ in
the Obama Administration, it is merely President Obama, Baker
Donelson, etc. merely PROJECTING information for
DECEPTIVE purposes; however, the CRIMINAL/
TERRORIST/SUPREMACIST/RACIST Regime players are
still in office. See for instance EXHIBIT “12” – Change in
Administration attached hereto and incorporated by reference as
if set forth in full herein. However, in doing research you may
find that ALL if not the MAJORITY are ASSOCIATED with
Baker Donelson.

Citizens may want to know why the ECONOMY of the United States is so bad –
Yes, look at who is sitting in the TOP/HEAD seat – BAKER DONELSON!!
Moreover, who may ACTUALLY be running the United States Government, Banks,
Real Estate, etc. See EXHIBIT “13” – The Hands Behind Government Operations
attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein. Now this
law firm has SCRUBBED information from the INTERNET as it attempts to TUCK-
TAIL and HIDE!! Well Newsome has News - - BUSTED. . . BUSTED. . . BUSTED.
Just as such law firms as Baker Donelson and those they have CONSPIRED with have
felt at LIBERTY to have information POSTED on the INTERNET regarding Newsome
known to be false, obtained and provided for CRIMINAL INTENT, MALICIOUSNESS
and DAMAGING; Newsome has taken the LIBERTY to GO PUBLIC and EXPOSE
such CORRUPTION in the United States Government to the
PUBLIC/WORLD/MEDIA at large.

Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co., 110 S.Ct. 2695 (1990) - Where statement of
―opinion‖ on matter of public concern reasonably implies false and
defamatory facts involving private figure, plaintiff must show that false
implications were made with some level of fault to support recovery. U.S.C.A.
Const.Amend. 1.

Paul proclaimed his innocence to . . . leaders. When is it wise to make
a public response to false accusations, and when should we just let
them go?
In the case of Paul, the gospel would have been discredited if
he had not spoken up. His circumstances made him look like a
criminal, and he had no history with these leaders to expect them to
assume otherwise without a proper defense.

Page 18 of 113

If we have been publicly slandered by
credible sources, we should probably make a
public response. Otherwise our own witness will
be compromised. . . Jesus warned us that some
people will say all manner of evil against us
falsely, so we should not be surprised when it
happens. But we do need to exercise wisdom
when we become aware of it.15
16. Newsome believes it is of PUBLIC/WORLDWIDE importance for
citizens to see how President Barack Obama, his Administration and others who
CONSPIRE with them have gone to great lengths to destroy Newsome‘s
CHARACTER, REPUTATION, INTEGRITY. Moreover, the life of one who is:

a) Mississippi State Champion in Track & Field;
b) Has Ranked Amongst the United States Elite Athletes;
c) Who‘s Who Among American High School Students;
d) All-American;
e) Olympic Trials Qualifier/Participant, etc.
f) Member on One of the Fastest 4 x 400 Relay Teams in the
Nation consisted of one of the United States Top American
Sportscasters – Pamela Oliver (i.e. now currently with Fox
Sports – covered some of the 2011 Super Bowl Interviews with
Football Players). See EXHIBITS “45” and “46”
respectively. Newsome also provides a web link Honoring
such successes of this Florida A&M University Relay Team
http://web.me.com/bradwellh/1984_All_Americans/Welcome.html

g) Having the Privilege of Attending Mississippi Valley State
University During the Time One of the Top National Football
League‘s ―Wide Receiver‖ – Jerry Rice – Era. See EXHIBIT
“47” attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set
forth in full herein.
h) Acknowledgement of Newsome‘s work Ethics and Character
with statements such as:
This letter is to confirm and recommend Ms. Vogel
Newsome to a position of Executive Assistant, Administrative
Assistant or greater. While working with Lash Marine, she
performed the duties of Executive Assistant with skill and

15
2009-2010 Standard Lesson Commentary (King James Version) - August 29, 2010 Lesson Entitled: ―Upheld By God‖ -
Subtitle: ―Let’s Talk It Over.‖

Page 19 of 113

energy. Her spirit and motivation acted as a beacon of light to
others. Her leadership and training of others was a great
service. Always willing to share; she possess a unique ability
to teach complex skills to the beginner and bring them quickly
up to speed. In addition, being a caring and concerned citizen
she put aside her time to train and work with Training, Inc.
employees to develop their office skills for a better future.
She is an asset and will be sorely missed at Lash Marine. - -
ROBERT K. LANSDEN (VICE PRESIDENT)

I have been very, very pleased with Vogel, not only
in terms of her work product, but also in terms of her attitude
and personality. I would rate her as one of the best legal
secretaries with whom I have ever worked. I would highly
recommend her to anyone who is looking for a full-time legal
secretary. If my previous secretary were not rejoining me, I
would want Vogel to be my new permanent secretary.
If anyone would care to discuss Vogel with me,
please do not hesitate to give them my name and number. I
will be more than happy to talk with them.
I am not certain of the exact day when my previous
secretary will rejoin me. It could be immediately, or, it could
be a couple of weeks. In light of that, we would like to request
that we be allowed to continue to work with Vogel until
further notice. However, the last thing I want to do is have
Vogel miss another good opportunity that might lead to
permanent employment. Therefore, if she must be reassigned,
I will understand, but grudgingly so.. . . - - RALPH B.
GERMANY, JR. (ATTORNEY)

I was first introduced to Ms. Newsome over five (5)
years ago. Since that time, she has been a Woman of integrity
and intelligence. Ms. Newsome always has presented herself
in a professional manner and has always addressed me and
others with the uttermost of respect. Ms. Newsome outgoing
personality and personal strengths would make her an
excellent additional to anyone‘s staff. I have had the
opportunity to work with Ms. Newsome and she has
demonstrated flexibility in working outside of her field of
endeavor and doing an excellent job is a strong indicator of
how well she will do in her chosen field of endeavor. Ms.
Newsome demonstrated a willingness to perform any task
assigned to her promptly and correctly with little supervision.
Ms. Newsome is a very pleasant person to associate with,
works as a team player, and would truly be an ASSET to your
organization because she is the best one for the job. - - LISA J.
WASHINGTON (COORDINATOR)

June 16, 2005, Email Exchange Between Tommy Page and
Newsome:

Page: You looked very smart &
professional as you walked toward the
building!

Page 20 of 113

Newsome: Why thank you. I strive to dress
and carry myself in a manner in which PKH
requires. 

Page: You do it well.

See EXHIBIT “56” attached hereto and incorporated by
reference as if set forth in full herein as well as Exhibit “93” of
Newsome‘s EM/ORS.

17. United States President Abraham Lincoln issued and executed an
EXECUTIVE ORDER known as the EMANCIPATION PROCLAMATION on or
about January 1, 1863 – approximately 148 YEARS Ago – which ORDERED
the FREEDOM of Slaves. Nevertheless, 148 years later, the United States still have
the likes of Respondents and those who conspire with them DETERMINED to take
Newsome and members of her class BACK into SLAVERY!!! However, as
recent NEWS has shown and FOREIGN NATIONS have PROVEN,
the ERA of OPPRESSION by such TERRORIST/SUPREMACIST
Regimes (i.e. as the United States) is OVER!!! - - SAY, “NO
MORE!!” Foreign Nations/Citizens making it KNOWN they do NOT want
OUTSIDE interference from the United States – THANK GOD!!!!! How can a
HYPOCRITICAL country like the United States minister to the needs of those who
have been OPPRESSED, ENSLAVED and in BONDAGE, when the United States
itself engage in such CRIMINAL and CORRUPTION against its citizens.

FREE AT LAST, FREE AT LAST – THANK GOD
ALMIGHTY WE ARE FREE AT LAST!!!

See how ELATED citizens in the Middle East are to be FREE and out of
BONDAGE, that many were willing to DIE (i.e. sacrifice their lives) rather than
remain ENSLAVED to a Terrorist/Supremacist regime. See EXHIBIT ―14‖ –
Photos of Citizens in the Middle East Celebrating their VICTORY attached hereto
and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein. It may have only taken
seeing the SUCCESS on November 2, 2010 in the United States and the
encouragement from a Computer Website Executive, to take up the MANTLE and
LEAD/ORGANIZE the TAKE OVER!!!

18. Great SACRIFICES have been made by people such as
―Whistleblower‖ Army Spc. Bradley Manning (―Manning‖) - See EXHIBIT “15”
attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein - who has
risked his life to REPORT and EXPOSE the CORRUPTION and CRIMINAL/CIVIL
violations of the United States because he want the PUBLIC to know the TRUTH!
COURAGEOUS acts by a citizen it appears who could NOT look the other way and
allow INJUSTICES, CORRUPTION and CRIMES to continue WITHOUT making
the PUBLIC AWARE! CHINA is correct in SPEAKING out and

Page 21 of 113

SHINING THE LIGHT on the United States and its
HYPROCRISY!!

Newsome believes a reasonable mind may conclude that
based upon the facts, evidence and legal conclusions
contained herein, that had taken his concerns to the proper
government agency/authority, NOTHING would have been
done. Moreover, that to silence Manning and prevent
knowledge of the United States role in CORRUPTION and
COVER-UPS in criminal/civil wrongs may have had him
“KILLED/MURDERED/ASSASSINATED.‖
19. Great SACRIFICES have been made by people as WIKILEAKS‘
Julian Assange - See EXHIBIT “16” attached hereto and incorporated by reference
as if set forth in full herein - who has come under attacks for releasing such
CRITICAL, DAMAGING and PERTINENT information to the PUBLIC/WORLD
regarding the United States CORRUPTION and COVER-UP of CRIMINAL/CIVIL
WRONGS.

20. There are approximately TWO United States President (i.e. Abraham
Lincoln and John F. Kennedy) who were ASSASSINATED because of the likes of
Respondents, Obama Administration, etc. and others who did not want to move
FORWARD and INSISTED on keeping a RACE of people OPPRESSED and in
BONDAGE!

21. PROMINATE Civil Rights Leaders (i.e. Medgar Evers, Malcolm X,
Martin Luther King Jr.) were ASSASSINATED because of the likes of Respondents,
Obama Administration, etc. and others who did not want to move FORWARD and
INSISTED on keeping a RACE of people OPPRESSED and in BONDAGE!

22. As with Newsome, there are other African American women who
have come under attack for speaking out and/or exercising Rights secured under the
Constitution and/or laws of the United States. For instance:

a. In July 2010, Shirley Sherrod (―Sherrod‖) was UNLAWFULLY/ILLEGALLY
removed from her job – i.e. Obama Administration requesting that she
RESIGN. See EXHIBIT “17” attached hereto and incorporated by reference as
if set forth in full herein. It does NOT look good to the PUBLIC/WORLD when
such attacks on Sherrod comes approximately 6 days AFTER Newsome‘s
July 13, 2010 email entitled, ――U.S. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: The
Downfall/Doom of the Obama Administration – Corruption/Conspiracy/Cover-
Up/Criminal Acts Made Public‖ - which was received by United States
President Barack Obama and those in his Administration (i.e. like Shirley

Page 22 of 113

Sherrod‘s boss – Secretary of Agriculture Thomas Vilsack) – See EXHIBIT
“18” – Excerpt of the July 13, 2010 email evidencing Thomas Vilsack as a
RECIPIENT.

Sherrod who is an ACTIVIST and a product of an HBCU (Historical Black
College and University) – Albany State University. Newsome being an
ACTIVIST and product of HBCU – Florida A&M University.

b. In November 2010, Velma Hart was FIRED/TERMINATED/LAID OFF from
her job as Chief Financial Officer for American Veterans AFTER being
TELEVISED questioning President Obama stating for instance:

―Quite frankly, I’m exhausted. Exhausted of defending you, defending your
administration, defending the man for change I voted for, and deeply disappointed with
where we are right now. I‘ve been told that I voted for a man who said he was going to
change things in a meaningful way for the middle class. I‘m one of those people and I‘m
waiting, sir, I‘m waiting. I don‘t feel it yet . . .‖

See EXHIBIT “19” attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set forth
in full herein. Newsome knew that based upon the MEDIA coverage, that Hart’s
employment days were NUMBERED. Sure enough ―acting TRUE to form‖ Hart
may have been FIRED/TERMINATED/LAID OFF as a direct and proximate
result of exercising her First Amendment Rights.

c. Clearly under the Willie Lynch Practices one can see the concerns
such OPPRESSORS had regarding the African-American/Black
Woman. Such Oppressors thought that Malcolm X and Martin
Luther King Jr. was a problem/threat so the United States
Government was pleased with such Civil Rights Leaders’
assassinations. Now they are finding out that Newsome and a
number of other African-American/Black women are NOT
remaining silent and giving into the WILLIE LYNCH practices.
23. Newsome uses not only her own PERSONAL experiences but those
of citizens such as ―Carl Brandon‖ and ―Omar Thornton‖ who were targeted and
subjected to DISCRIMINATORY practices and CONSPIRACIES for purposes of
forcing and driving them to commit criminal acts – See EXHIBITS “20” (Carl
Brandon) and “21” (Omar Thornton)16 attached hereto and incorporated by reference

16
http://www.omaha.com/article/20100803/NEWS/708039865/1031; http://www.examiner.com/x-48240-NY-Public-Policy-
Examiner~y2010m8d8-Possibility-that-Omar-Thornton-did-not-act-alone

Using the following excerpts:

Some people don‘t want to discuss racism as being a form of violence because it would reveal that they themselves are in fact
extremely violent and in denial about it.
Omar Thornton‘s incident has a host of websites spewing hate talk toward African-Americans. Hartford Distributors may
have used racism and gradually managed to kill Omar Thornton mentally and emotionally before the killing spree via attrition. Jessica
Anne Brocuglio, an ex-girlfriend of Omar Thornton, comes forward with character evidence:
He always felt like he was being discriminated (against) because he was black[.]‖ ―Basically they wouldn’t give him pay
raises. He never felt like they accepted him as a hard working person.‖

Page 23 of 113

as if set forth in full herein. Newsome having gone PUBLIC and WORLDWIDE in
showing how the ―WILLIE LYNCH‖17 practices are implemented by the likes of

This statement corroborates with what Kristi Hannah, Omar Thornton‘s fiancée before his death, had been telling the
Manchester Police Department about Hartford Distributors treating him like a persona non grata.
Plus, a fellow co-worker who was employed with Omar Thornton at Hartford Distributors has come forward stating that he
had seen the racist taunts: ―Stuff on walls. Racist comments. I saw with my own eyes.‖ More importantly, the fellow co-worker said
Mr. Thornton was hired as a truck driver; yet, he was assigned to loading boxes in the warehouse. Mr. Thornton had to fight to get
behind the wheel. The co-worker then states that Hartford Distributors are lying and the evidence is in Omar‘s cell phone. These
statements are serious and they are not based upon speculation. This places the co-worker in a position to be called as a key witness to
racism within Hartford Distributors. Although the co-worker is no longer under the employ of Hartford Distributors, he has witnessed
these incidents first-hand. These statements make it appear as if Hartford Distributors is deliberately being obtuse to shield themselves
from potential liability. As Marcellus said in William Shakespeare‘s play ―Hamlet,‖ ―[s]omething is rotten in the state of Denmark.‖
Thus far, the answers provided by Hartford Distributors just rubs me the wrong way.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jBNP73m9cp2g6qFtWxCbJH6IAD3gD9HEV71O0

But underneath, Thornton seethed with a sense of racial injustice for years that culminated in a shooting rampage Tuesday in
which the Connecticut man killed eight and wounded two others at his job at Hartford Distributors in Manchester before killing himself.
"I know what pushed him over the edge was all the racial stuff that was happening at work," said his girlfriend, Kristi
Hannah.
Thornton, a black man, said as much in a chilling, four-minute 911 call.
"You probably want to know the reason why I shot this place up," Thornton said in a recording released Thursday. "This
place is a racist place. They're treating me bad over here. And treat all other black employees bad over here, too. So I took it to my
own hands and handled the problem. I wish I could have got more of the people." . . .
One time Thornton had a confrontation with a white co-worker who used a racial slur against him, she said. Thornton changed
jobs a few times because he was not getting raises, Brocuglio said.
"I'm sick of having to quit jobs and get another job because they can't accept me," she said he told her. . . .
Brocuglio's sister, Toni, said Thornton would come home and say co-workers called him racial slurs. He was also upset by
comments made by passers-by about the interracial couple, she said.
"He just didn't understand why people had so much hatred in their lives," Toni Brocuglio said. . . .
But Hannah said he showed her cell phone photos of racist graffiti in the bathroom at the beer company and overheard a
company official using a racial epithet in reference to him, but a union representative did not return his phone calls. Police said they
recovered the phone and forensics experts would examine it.

and Port Gibson Shooter (Carl Brandon) complained of:

http://workplaceviolence.blogspot.com/2006_04_01_archive.html

Apparently, the deadly shooting rampage was the culmination of years of anger and frustration over what the shooter believed
to be false accusations of sexual harassment. "I don't know how you can consider me a danger. I was made a criminal through the
system. . .

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/port-gibson-ms/T0RUM1ECTB788O4HN

―I would put Carl Brandon as a model from my town. I think he was one of the more intellegent and well manners persons in
the class. i cannot imagine this guy walking up one morning to decide that he want to destroy his life and others.‖ – Sarah Kelly
(Chicago, IL)
―Some time a person try to walk away from a problem, but there are people in this world that want let them do that. This
man had left his job and move on, but that was not good enough. They had to call his job and tell them what happened 9 years ago,
and got this man fired. I hate that he let the devil take over him at the time, but I do understand . . . I hope we can learn something from
this tragedy.‖ – Shelly Jones (Nashville, TN)
―He had lost his job because someone said he had harassed them. He lost his reputation and the respect of some. When he
tried to move on some vindictive, vicious persons went to his next job and scandalized him. He fought through every legal avenue
available to him and found no justice.‖ – Cassandra Cook Butler (AOL)
17
―In my bag here, I have a foolproof [sic] method of controlling your black slaves. I guarantee every one of you that if
installed correctly it will control the slaves for at least 300 years. . . Any member of your family or your overseer can use it. . . I use fear,
distrust and envy for control. . .

The Breaking Process of the African Woman
Take the female and run a series of tests on her to see if she will submit to your desires willingly. TEST her in every way,
because she is the most important factor for good economics. If she shows any sign of resistance in submitting completely to your will,
do not hesitate to use the bull whip on her to extract the last bit of resistance out of her. Take care not to kill her, for in doing so, you
spoil good economic. . . .‖

Page 24 of 113

Respondents for purposes of breaking down Newsome and those of her Race for
purposes of keeping them OPPRESSED, ENSLAVED and in BONDAGE!
Moreover, to drive CITIZENS into committing criminal acts as a direct and
proximate result of CONSPIRACIES involving racially motivated violations of the
laws. See EXHIBIT “22” – Willie Lynch document attached hereto and
incorporated by reference as if set forth in full herein. So NO foreign citizens in
the MIDDLE EAST can clearly see from documentation and
EVIDENCE provided them that the “Obama Administration” is a
SHAM – i.e. CORRUPT as well as the United States JUDICIAL
SYSTEM. Clearly the United States can be NO role model in that it engages in
CORRUPTION and the COVER-UP of discriminatory practices, human/civil rights
violations, obstruction of justice, and other criminal/civil wrongs leveled against
African-Americans and/or people of color.

24. It was IMPORTANT to Newsome that the PUBLIC/WORLD saw
just how the First ALLEDGED African-American President (Barack Obama)
ABANDONED his Pastor Jeremiah Wright when EXCERPTS of his sermons (i.e.
SIMILAR practice as that used on Shirley Sherrod) were taken OUT-OF-
CONTEXT to makeWright appear as CRAZY, LUNATIC, and HOSTILE.
Moreover, how the WHITE candidates (i.e. Hilary Clinton – now Secretary of State
and Sarah Palin who was the Vice Presidential Candidate for Republican Party)
wanted to paint Wright as a TERRORIST!! IMPORTANT TO NOTE: It was a
good thing that Army Spc. Bradley Manning released information regarding the
United States Government‘s CORRUPTION and COVER-UP of crimes. Moreover,
WikiLeaks sharing information with the WORLD – then the coming of a release of
―U.S.: 1940s STD
an Article on or about October 1, 2010, entitled,
Experiments ―Clearly Unethical‖ SUPPORTING the United
States Government‘s role in UNETHICAL practices – i.e. as
that of the Tuskegee Test which were INFLICTED on
African-American men. See EXHIBIT “23” - “U.S.: 1940s STD
Experiments “Clearly Unethical” attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if
set forth in full herein. So while the United States was trying to portray the preacher
(Jeremiah Wright) as being CRAZY, TERRORIST, etc. and taking EXCERPTS from
sermons to DECEIVE the Nation – LOOK WHAT HAPPENED!!! The TRUTH is
surfacing and being released to the PUBLIC/WORLD as with that provided by
WikiLeaks.

25. While President Obama and his Administration are attempting to
make it APPEAR that they were for the citizens of Egypt and other Foreign Nations
taking back their Government, they were NOT. President Obama and his
Administration CLEARLY are in FEAR now because they realize that the NEW
Foreign Governments being established by those who have been OPPRESSED,
ENSLAVED and in BONDAGE for DECADES (i.e. some over 40 Years) will NOT

Page 25 of 113

allow the United States to DICTATE and continue to use their POWER to
TERRORIZE them as they have done to Newsome and others that SPEAK OUT and
EXPOSE CORRUPTION, INJUSTICES, RACISM, DISCRIMINATION, etc.
Newsome believes it is President Obama‘s time to take his OWN advice:

STEP DOWN FROM OFFICE – i.e. in that he has known
of the CORRUPTION and COVER-UP of crimes and civil wrongs leveled not
only against Newsome but those of other citizens of the United States that were
TIMELY, PROPERLY and ADEQUATELY brought to his attention; however,
made a CONSCIOUS and WILLING decision to look the other way.
Leaving to question as with IMPEACHED
President Nixon – WHAT did President Barack
Obama know and WHEN did he know it? Newsome
believesit is time for President Obama and his
TERRORIST/SUPREMACIST/RACIST Regime to LEAVE
the White House. Therefore, Newsome has INITIATED the appropriate
legal action(s) – Petition for EXTRAORDINARY WRIT with the Supreme
Court of the United States for the CORRECTION and EXPOSURE of practices
OUTLAWED HUNDREDS of Years Ago.

26. President Obama‘s/United States Government‘s RECENTLY coming
out and speaking out as though they were for the citizens in Egypt, Tunisia, Yemen,
Syria, Libya, etc. and other Foreign citizens taking ON/BACK their government is a
FARCE and the Foreign Citizens/Leaders know it. Foreign
Leaders/Media/Citizens may be aware of the attacks on Newsome because she has
released information to be shared as to the OPPRESSIVE and ENSLAVEMENT
practices of the United States Government, employers and those who have conspired
with them to destroy her life. For instance leaders in EGYPT knew that
placing President Obama in the White House was a FRONT and merely
DECEPTIVE acts to mislead Foreign Countries, their Leaders and
Citizens:
Muhammad Habib, first deputy to the general guide of the Muslim Brotherhood, said:
He said
―the US Administration employs all cards to serve its own interests.”

that the speech that Obama intends to deliver in
Egypt is “of no value.‖ He added: ―Statements and
speeches must be associated with, or preceded by
real change in policy on the ground, because
policy is judged by deeds, not words.‖
See EXHIBIT “24”“EGYPT‘S Opposition Leaders Sound Off On
-
Upcoming Obama Visit” attached hereto and incorporated by reference as if set
forth in full herein. As well as the following information at:

Page 26 of 113

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2009/06/03/v-print/69398/obama-to-lay-
out-vision-of-muslim.html

. . . Bin Laden said that Obama's approach to the
Muslim world was no different from that of Bush18,
whose policies — from the invasion of Iraq to the use of some
interrogation methods widely considered torture — convinced many Muslims
that the United States had launched a war on Islam. . .

However, Gamal Eid, the head of the Arabic Network for Human Rights
Information, said he planned to decline the invitation. The Israeli ambassador to
he didn't want to be in the same
Egypt also is invited, and Eid said
room as a representative of what he called a "criminal"
government.
See EXHIBIT “25” – “Obama to Lay Out Vision of Muslim’s World’s Future”
Article attached hereto and incorporated by reference. ALL FOR
POLITICAL/POLL POINTS - - With ALL the Government INTELLIGENCE the
United States has, how CONVENIENT it was that Bin Laden has been killed – 4
days AFTER President Obama releases his ALLEDGED Birth Certificate. See
EXHIBIT “6” at the 16th Page. President Obama TAKING CREDIT for ordering
Bin Laden‘s death. LOOK AT THE TIMING of this News!!!!

27. This Court has retained copies of the PFEW in this action as well as
the $300 Filing Fee submitted. Newsome being a paying litigant in that it appeared
to her that this Court may have attempted to try and get her to come before it in the
“In Forma Pauperis” (―IFP‖) status to avoid having to address the issues presented
therein – i.e. in that IFP pleadings/filings do NOT appear to be subject to the same
standard of review as that of PAYING litigants.

In re McDonald, 489 U.S. 180, 109 S.Ct. 993 (1989) Jessie
McDonald may well have abused his right to file petitions in this Court
without payment of the docketing fee; the Court's order documents that
fact. I do not agree, however, that he poses such a threat to the orderly
administration of justice that we should embark on the unprecedented and
dangerous course the Court charts today. . . . I am most concerned,
however, that if, as I fear, we continue on the course we chart today, we
will end by closing our doors to a litigant with a meritorious claim. It is
rare, but it does happen on occasion that we grant review and even
decide in favor of a litigant who previously had presented multiple
unsuccessful*188 petitions on the same issue. See, e.g., Chessman v.
Teets, 354
U.S. 156, 77 S.Ct. 1127, 1 L.Ed.2d 1253 (1957); see id., at 173-177, 77
S.Ct. at 1136-1138 (Douglas, J., dissenting).
"Petitioner is no stranger to us. Since 1971, he has made 73
separate filings with the Court, not including this petition, which is his
eighth so far this Term. These include 4 appeals, 33 petitions for certiorari,
99 petitions for extraordinary writs, 7 applications for stay and other
injunctive relief, and 10 petitions for rehearing." Id. pp. 994- 995.

18
PUBLIC/WORLD needs to know because President Obama may be relying upon the advice of the same counsel and/or
advisors used by President Bush.

Page 27 of 113

"But paupers filing pro se petitions are not subject to the financial
considerations - filing fees and attorney's fees - that deter other litigants
from filing frivolous petitions." Id. p. 996.
The Supreme Court (even after all of McDonald's filings) did not
close the door to McDonald. A litigant who is identified as filing 73
separate filings in a one-year period; however, ruled, "Petitioner remains
free under the present order to file in forma pauperis requests for relief
other than an extraordinary writ, if he qualifies under the Court's Rule 46
and does not similarly abuse that privilege." Id. p. 996.

28. The EMERGENCY relief sought through EM/ORS and PFEW is that
which is required to deter and mitigate damages sustained by Newsome. Moreover,
is relief that should have been sought by the appropriate Government Agency(s) to
which matters were brought; however, failed to perform ministerial duties owed
Newsome in RETALIATION of her having brought legal action and/or knowledge of
her engagement in protected activities – i.e. active role in conspiracy(s) leveled
against Newsome.

29. Newsome would be prejudiced by this action should this Court deny
her EQUAL protection of the laws, EQUAL privileges and immunities of the laws
and DUE PROCESS of laws in the handling of this instant RT031711&042711SCL
to which it supports the PFEW and EM/ORS submitted to the attention of this Court
for filing. Therefore, this instant RT031711&042711SCL is being filed to preserve
the rights, arguments and defenses asserted by Newsome under the statutes/laws
governing said matters.

30. For the sake from having to reargue issues/arguments/defenses and
legal conclusions, Newsome incorporates by reference ―PFEW‖ and ―EM/ORS‖ as
well as their supporting Appendices/Exhibits submitted to the Supreme Court of the
United States for filing.

31. Newsome believes that the facts, evidence and legal conclusions
provided herein as well as in ―PFEW‖ and ―EM/ORS‖ will sustain that the Supreme
Court of the United States MUST take jurisdiction in this matter; CANNOT pass it by
because it may be doubtful; MUST decide the issues/questions presented before this
Court; and CANNOT decline the exercise of jurisdiction to which Newsome is
entitled:
Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123, 165, 28 S.Ct. 441, 52 L.Ed.
714 (1908) - [HN1] The United States Supreme Court will not
take jurisdiction if it should not; but it is equally true that it
MUST take jurisdiction if it should. The judiciary CANNOT,
as the legislature may, avoid a measure because it approaches
the confines of the Constitution. The court CANNOT pass it
by because it is doubtful. With whatever doubts, with
whatever difficulties, a case may be attended, the court MUST
decide it, if it is brought before it. The court has NO more
right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction, which is given,
than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other
would be TREASON to the Constitution. Questions may
occur which the court would gladly avoid, but the court
CANNOT avoid them. All the court can do is to exercise its
best judgment, and conscientiously perform its duty.

Page 28 of 113

for to do so would be TREASON to the Constitution. Therefore, Newsome seeks this
Court‘s addressing issues/questions presented it and to perform the duties owed her
as well as the citizens of the United States.

I. ALL WRITS ACT

Newsome hopes that the Supreme Court of the United States understands that due to the

EXTRAORDINARY, EXCEPTIONAL and CRITICAL/EXIGENT circumstances involved in this

case, this instant RT031711&042711SCL is necessary in response its March 17, 2011 letter to her.

Newsome hopes that there is sufficient and adequate information contained herein as well as in

EM/ORS, PFEW and their supporting Exhibits/Appendices to end concerns of what she believes may

be DILATORY practices by this Court in light of the DAMAGING information contained herein

which actually has LED back to its DOORSTEPS due to its FAILURE to act when Newsome first

began coming to this Court to address such HIDEOUS criminal behavior and civil violations. Due to

the extenuating factors involved and the impact such crimes/civil wrongs have had not only on

Newsome but the PUBLIC/WORLD at large, she request that her Petition for Extraordinary Writ be

filed and this Court issue the required legal process on Respondents. Newsome believes that there is

sufficient Respondent information – i.e. names, addresses, etc. - available in this EM/ORS, PFEW

and their supporting Exhibits/Appendices to move forward. Even if not, this Court has the proper

legal tools and resources to retain information to avoid any further delays in the PROSECUTION and

ADMINISTRATION of justice.

28 USC § 1651 Writs:
(a) The Supreme Court and all courts established by Act of
Congress may issue ALL writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their
respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.

Section 376 provided:
―. . . The Supreme Court. . . shall have power to issue ALL writs NOT
specifically provided for by statute, which may be NECESSARY for the
exercise of their respective jurisdictions, and agreeable to the usages and
principles of law.‖

Ex parte Fahey, 67 S.Ct. 1558 (1947) - United States Supreme
Court has power to issue extraordinary writs . . .but such

Page 29 of 113

remedies should be resorted to only where appeal is clearly
inadequate, and they are reserved for really extraordinary
causes.

Black’s Law Dictionary (8th Edition): All Writs Act – A federal statute that
gives the U.S. Supreme Court and all courts established by Congress the power
to issue writs in aid of their jurisdiction and in conformity with the usages and
principles of law.

Black’s Law Dictionary – Second Pocket Edition:
Writ: A court‘s written order, in the name of a state or other competent
legal authority, commanding the addressee to do or refrain from doing some
specified act.

Extraordinary Writ: A writ issued by a court exercising unusual or
discretionary power.

Original Writ: A writ commencing an action and directing the
defendant to appear and answer.

U.S. v. Denedo, 129 S.Ct. 2213 (U.S.,2009) - Under the All Writs Act, a court's
power to issue any form of relief, extraordinary or otherwise, is contingent on
that court's subject-matter jurisdiction over the case or controversy. 28 U.S.C.A.
§ 1651(a).

Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. v. Federal Election Com'n, 125 S.Ct. 2 (U.S.,2004)
- Authority granted to courts under the All Writs Act is to be used sparingly and
only in the most critical and exigent circumstances. (Per Chief Justice
Rehnquist, sitting as single Justice.) 28 U.S.C.A. § 1651(a).

Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. v. Federal Election Com'n, 125 S.Ct. 2 (U.S.,2004)
- Authority granted to courts under the All Writs Act is appropriately exercised
only: (1) when necessary or appropriate in aid of court's jurisdiction; and (2)
when legal rights at issue are indisputably clear. (Per Chief Justice Rehnquist,
sitting as single Justice.) 28 U.S.C.A. § 1651(a).

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that in compliance with the March 17, 2011 Letter issued by this

Court, and in furtherance of claims addressed in EM/ORS, PFEW and subsequent filings to said

pleadings, Newsome states:

32. Her concerns as to what she believes to be this Court‘s attempt to
MISLEAD her and/or MISGUIDE her into thinking that the ONLY type of
Extraordinary Writs this Court will address are: extraordinary writ of mandamus,
mandamus/prohibition, habeas corpus – when it IS NOT!!

33. Newsome believes that a reasonable mind may conclude that the
EM/ORS, PFEW and their supporting Exhibits/Appendices clearly supports and
provides this Court with ADEQUATE and SUFFICIENT information that it could
have concluded that Newsome seeks to bring legal actions under the ―ALL WRITS
ACT‖ and/or applicable statutes/laws governing claims addressed in EM/ORS and

Page 30 of 113

PFEW. Furthermore, based upon the facts, evidence and legal conclusions, this
Court having the DUTY and OBLIGATION to correct any/all miscarriage of justice
reported through this action and/or known to it.

34. Based upon the facts, evidence and legal conclusion provided in
Newsome‘s EM/ORS and PFEW, she seeks legal relief under the All Writs Act and
any/all applicable statutes/laws to correct legal wrongs addressed and/or known to
this Court which may include the following (i.e. however, is not limited to said
listing):

a. Original Writ

b. Writ of Conspiracy

c. Writ of Course

d. Writ of Detinue

e. Writ of Entry

f. Writ of Exigi Facias

g. Writ of Formedon

h. Writ of Injunction

i. Writ of Mandamus

j. Writ of Possession

k. Writ of Praecipe

l. Writ of Protection

m. Writ of Recaption

n. Writ of Prohibition

o. Writ of Review

p. Writ of Supersedeas

q. Writ of SUPERVISORY CONTROL

r. Writ of Securitate Pacis

s. Extraterritorial Writs

Page 31 of 113

35. Newsome believes based upon the facts, evidence and legal
conclusions, that the record evidence will sustain that CRITICAL and EXIGENT
circumstances exist to support her EM/ORS and PFEW; moreover, relief under the
―All Writs Act.‖ Furthermore, Newsome‘s EM/ORS and PFEW sets forth evidence
and facts that authority under the ―All Writs Act‖ is warranted to aid in this Court‘s
Jurisdiction and that the Legal Rights at ISSUE are INDISPUTABLY clear.

Wisconsin Right to Life v. Federal Election Com’n, 125 S.Ct. 2, 542
U.S. 1305, 159 L.Ed.2d 805 (2004) – Authority granted to courts under
the All Writs Act is to be used sparingly and only in the most
CRITICAL and EXIGENT circumstances (Per Chief Justice
Rehnquist).
Authority granted under the All Rights Act is appropriately
exercised only: (1) when necessary or appropriate to aid in court‘s
jurisdiction; and (2) when legal rights at ISSUE are INDISPUTABLY
clear. (Per Chief Justice Rehnquist). Id.

36. Newsome believes that the facts, evidence and legal conclusions
provided in EM/ORS and PFEW and their supporting Exhibits/Appendices will
sustain that the Writs sought as well as other applicable relief KNOWN to this Court
to correct the legal wrongs reported will sustain LEGISLATIVELY approved sources
of PROCEDURAL INSTRUMENTS designed to achieve RATIONAL ends of law
and may be used by this Court in ISSUING the APPROPRIATE Orders to assist it in
conducting FACTUAL INQUIRIES/INVESTIGATIONS into the Issues/Claims set
forth in EM/ORS, PFEW and their supporting Exhibits/Appendices.

Harris v. Nelson, 89 S.Ct. 1082, 394 U.S. 286, 22 L.Ed.2d 281,
rehearing denied 89 S.Ct. 1623, 394 U.S. 1025, 23 L.Ed. 50 (1969) –
All Writs Act serves as LEGISLATIVELY approved source of
procedural instruments designed to achieve rational ends of law and
may be relied on by courts in issuing order appropriate to ASSIST
them in CONDUCTING FACTUAL INQUIRIES.

37. The Supreme Court of the United States have statutory authority as
well as inherent power to execute the applicable Orders that are necessary to
CORRECT the legal wrongs/injustices and prevent interference/obstruction of justice
to the implementation of said Orders sought.

U.S. v. Wallace, 218 F.Supp. 290 (1963) – The courts of the United
States have statutory authority as well as inherent power to enter such
orders as may be necessary to effectuate their lawful decrees and to
prevent interference with, and obstruction to, their implementation.

38. Newsome believes that the facts, evidence and legal conclusion
provided in the EM/ORS and PFEW and their supporting Exhibits/Appendices will
sustain that this matter is of ―PUBLIC IMPORTANCE‖ and is of
PUBLIC/NATIONAL security in that it supports the COVER-UP of Respondents,
President Barack Obama, his Administration and the United States Government of
CORRUPTION, CRIMINAL/CIVIL VIOLATIONS and TERRORIST/RACIST/
SUPREMACIST practices. Furthermore, the record evidence will SUPPORT a
WILLFUL disregard of legislative policy, rules of the Supreme Court of the United

Page 32 of 113

05/03/11 U.S. Supreme Court Filing (Regarding President Obama-StorAll Matter)

05/03/11 U.S. Supreme Court Filing (Regarding President Obama-StorAll Matter)

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Mais procurados (8)

Destaque

Destaque (18)

Semelhante a 05/03/11 U.S. Supreme Court Filing (Regarding President Obama-StorAll Matter)

Semelhante a 05/03/11 U.S. Supreme Court Filing (Regarding President Obama-StorAll Matter) (20)

Último

Último (8)

05/03/11 U.S. Supreme Court Filing (Regarding President Obama-StorAll Matter)