SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 38
Vladimir E. Bakhrushin

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF
   WORLD UNIVERSITY
       RANKINGS


 Classic Private University
        Zaporizhjia
            2010
Different university rankings are widely used for
decision making at higher education. These rankings
may be common or specialized, depending of their
application area.
     In these report the results of statistical analysis are
presented for such indexes: R1 – Top 500 world
universities – 2008; R2 - ARWU or Shanghai ranking-
2008; R3 – The Times Good university guide 2008
(Great Britain universities ranking); R4 - World
Universities' ranking on the Web_Top 8000; R5 –
Ukrainian Top-200 universities ranking (Dzerkalo
Tyzhnya), etc.
     Two types of parameters were studied – empirical
distribution functions and correlation between ranking
components.
For R2 Alumni. The total number of the alumni of
an institution winning Nobel Prizes and Fields Medals.
Alumni are defined as those who obtain bachelor,
Master's or doctoral degrees from the institution.
Different weights are set according to the periods of
obtaining degrees. The weight is 100% for alumni
obtaining degrees in after 1991, 90% for alumni
obtaining degrees in 1981-1990, 80% for alumni
obtaining degrees in 1971-1980, and so on, and finally
10% for alumni obtaining degrees in 1901-1910. If a
person obtains more than one degrees from an
institution, the institution is considered once only..
    Weight – 10%/
Award. The total number of the staff of an
institution winning Nobel Prizes in Physics,
Chemistry, Medicine and Economics and Fields
Medal in Mathematics. Staff is defined as those who
work at an institution at the time of winning the prize.
The weight is 100% for winners in after 2001, 90% for
winners in 1991-2000, 80% for winners in 1981-1990,
70% for winners in 1971-1980, and so on, and finally
10% for winners in 1911-1920. If a winner is affiliated
with more than one institution, each institution is
assigned the reciprocal of the number of institutions.
For Nobel prizes, if a prize is shared by more than
one person, weights are set for winners according to
their proportion of the prize..
   Weight – 20%
HiCi. The number of highly cited researchers in
21 subject categories. These individuals are the most
highly cited within each category. The definition of
categories and detailed procedures can be found at
the website of Thomson ISI. Weight - 20
      N&S. The number of articles published in Nature
and Science between 2003 and 2007. To distinguish
the order of author affiliation, a weight of 100% is
assigned for corresponding author affiliation, 50% for
first author affiliation (second author affiliation if the
first author affiliation is the same as corresponding
author affiliation), 25% for the next author affiliation,
and 10% for other author affiliations. Only publications
of article type are considered. Weight -20
PUB. Total number of articles indexed in Science
Citation Index-Expanded and Social Science Citation
Index in 2007. Only publications of article type are
considered. When calculating the total number of
articles of an institution, a special weight of two was
introduced for articles indexed in Social Science
Citation Index. Weight – 20.

        PCP. The weighted scores of the above five
indicators divided by the number of full-time
equivalent academic staff. If the number of academic
staff for institutions of a country cannot be obtained,
the weighted scores of the above five indicators is
used. Weight - 10
Alumni = 0

       18    Univ California - San Francisco
       36    Univ California - Santa Barbara
       46    Univ California - Irvine
       48    Univ California - Davis
       48    Univ Southern California
       77    Univ Arizona
       80    Univ Utah
       88    Texas A&M Univ - Coll Station
       94    Arizona State Univ - Tempe
       95    Univ Virginia
Score on awards = 0
   21    Univ Michigan - Ann Arbor
   32    Duke Univ
   42    Pennsylvania State Univ - Univ Park
   48    Univ California - Davis
   52    Univ Pittsburgh - Pittsburgh
   57    Univ Florida
   60    McGill Univ
   63    Ohio State Univ - Columbus
   68    Osaka Univ
   77    Univ Arizona
   79    Tohoku Univ
   83    Boston Univ
   85    Michigan State Univ
   88    Texas A&M Univ - Coll Station
   95    Univ Virginia
   97    Lund Univ
   100   Univ Sydney
Times_Top_200_2009




                     KS = 0,66
The Times Good university guide 2008
Ukrainian Top-200 universities ranking - 2008




                          KS = 0,71(L); 1,66 (N)
Average Staff – Total rank = -19,8 (Med); -14,0 (Agr)
Statistical analysis of world university rankings (report for PDMU-2010)

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Biostatistics lec 2 variables and scales of measurement
Biostatistics lec 2 variables and scales of measurementBiostatistics lec 2 variables and scales of measurement
Biostatistics lec 2 variables and scales of measurement
Osmanmohamed38
 
York College(Cuny) Open House
York College(Cuny) Open HouseYork College(Cuny) Open House
York College(Cuny) Open House
YorkTV
 
Eqao Analysis 2008 2009 Pwrpt
Eqao Analysis 2008 2009 PwrptEqao Analysis 2008 2009 Pwrpt
Eqao Analysis 2008 2009 Pwrpt
drummosh
 

Mais procurados (13)

Biostatistics lec 2 variables and scales of measurement
Biostatistics lec 2 variables and scales of measurementBiostatistics lec 2 variables and scales of measurement
Biostatistics lec 2 variables and scales of measurement
 
Biostatistics lec 2 variables and scales of measurement
Biostatistics lec 2 variables and scales of measurementBiostatistics lec 2 variables and scales of measurement
Biostatistics lec 2 variables and scales of measurement
 
National Name Exchange 2.0 [Overview for UW Depts]
National Name Exchange 2.0 [Overview for UW Depts]National Name Exchange 2.0 [Overview for UW Depts]
National Name Exchange 2.0 [Overview for UW Depts]
 
Ranking universities responsibly
Ranking universities responsiblyRanking universities responsibly
Ranking universities responsibly
 
ERHAN ERKUT 2010
ERHAN ERKUT 2010ERHAN ERKUT 2010
ERHAN ERKUT 2010
 
York College(Cuny) Open House
York College(Cuny) Open HouseYork College(Cuny) Open House
York College(Cuny) Open House
 
A scientometric perspective on university ranking
A scientometric perspective on university rankingA scientometric perspective on university ranking
A scientometric perspective on university ranking
 
Eqao Analysis 2008 2009 Pwrpt
Eqao Analysis 2008 2009 PwrptEqao Analysis 2008 2009 Pwrpt
Eqao Analysis 2008 2009 Pwrpt
 
Serce Stata Sfo Roy Costilla Final
Serce Stata Sfo Roy Costilla FinalSerce Stata Sfo Roy Costilla Final
Serce Stata Sfo Roy Costilla Final
 
CWTS Leiden Ranking: An advanced bibliometric approach to university ranking
CWTS Leiden Ranking: An advanced bibliometric approach to university rankingCWTS Leiden Ranking: An advanced bibliometric approach to university ranking
CWTS Leiden Ranking: An advanced bibliometric approach to university ranking
 
Bibliometrics and University Rankings
Bibliometrics and University RankingsBibliometrics and University Rankings
Bibliometrics and University Rankings
 
New developments in the CWTS Leiden Ranking
New developments in the CWTS Leiden RankingNew developments in the CWTS Leiden Ranking
New developments in the CWTS Leiden Ranking
 
An in-depth bibliometric perspective on China’s scientific performance
An in-depth bibliometric perspective on China’s scientific performanceAn in-depth bibliometric perspective on China’s scientific performance
An in-depth bibliometric perspective on China’s scientific performance
 

Semelhante a Statistical analysis of world university rankings (report for PDMU-2010)

Paper 1: Shanghai Ranking (Liu, Nian Cai)
Paper 1: Shanghai Ranking (Liu, Nian Cai)Paper 1: Shanghai Ranking (Liu, Nian Cai)
Paper 1: Shanghai Ranking (Liu, Nian Cai)
Kent Business School
 
Academic Ranking of World Universities
Academic Ranking of World UniversitiesAcademic Ranking of World Universities
Academic Ranking of World Universities
Ankur Pandey
 
Goodall the confsept2010
Goodall the confsept2010Goodall the confsept2010
Goodall the confsept2010
Amy Hilton
 
Making sense of rankings
Making sense of rankingsMaking sense of rankings
Making sense of rankings
meltonj
 
Understanding the U.S. News & World Report “Best Colleges” 2007 - Handout
Understanding the U.S. News & World Report “Best Colleges” 2007 - HandoutUnderstanding the U.S. News & World Report “Best Colleges” 2007 - Handout
Understanding the U.S. News & World Report “Best Colleges” 2007 - Handout
Matthew Hendrickson
 

Semelhante a Statistical analysis of world university rankings (report for PDMU-2010) (20)

ARWU 2010
ARWU 2010ARWU 2010
ARWU 2010
 
Links prezi
Links preziLinks prezi
Links prezi
 
Universties global ranking systems for pub.
Universties global ranking systems for pub.Universties global ranking systems for pub.
Universties global ranking systems for pub.
 
International ranking system
International ranking system International ranking system
International ranking system
 
Paper 1: Shanghai Ranking (Liu, Nian Cai)
Paper 1: Shanghai Ranking (Liu, Nian Cai)Paper 1: Shanghai Ranking (Liu, Nian Cai)
Paper 1: Shanghai Ranking (Liu, Nian Cai)
 
Academic Ranking of World Universities
Academic Ranking of World UniversitiesAcademic Ranking of World Universities
Academic Ranking of World Universities
 
Utr. prog. frid. ying cheng
Utr. prog. frid. ying chengUtr. prog. frid. ying cheng
Utr. prog. frid. ying cheng
 
Accreditation of Educational Institutions
Accreditation of Educational InstitutionsAccreditation of Educational Institutions
Accreditation of Educational Institutions
 
Goodall the confsept2010
Goodall the confsept2010Goodall the confsept2010
Goodall the confsept2010
 
Making sense of rankings
Making sense of rankingsMaking sense of rankings
Making sense of rankings
 
Framework for ranking higher institutions in nigeria
Framework for ranking higher institutions in nigeriaFramework for ranking higher institutions in nigeria
Framework for ranking higher institutions in nigeria
 
Independent Colleges
Independent Colleges Independent Colleges
Independent Colleges
 
World univ ranking 2013 2014
World univ ranking 2013 2014World univ ranking 2013 2014
World univ ranking 2013 2014
 
Understanding World University Rankings, Sichuan University, July 2014
Understanding World University Rankings, Sichuan University, July 2014Understanding World University Rankings, Sichuan University, July 2014
Understanding World University Rankings, Sichuan University, July 2014
 
Understanding the U.S. News & World Report “Best Colleges” 2007 - Handout
Understanding the U.S. News & World Report “Best Colleges” 2007 - HandoutUnderstanding the U.S. News & World Report “Best Colleges” 2007 - Handout
Understanding the U.S. News & World Report “Best Colleges” 2007 - Handout
 
Juko usa 2017
Juko usa 2017Juko usa 2017
Juko usa 2017
 
Transfer & Advising Presentation
Transfer & Advising PresentationTransfer & Advising Presentation
Transfer & Advising Presentation
 
URAP 2010
URAP 2010URAP 2010
URAP 2010
 
Gulen Private School Brooklyn Amity School Profile
Gulen Private School Brooklyn Amity School ProfileGulen Private School Brooklyn Amity School Profile
Gulen Private School Brooklyn Amity School Profile
 
QS and THE subject rankings compared.pptx
QS and THE subject rankings compared.pptxQS and THE subject rankings compared.pptx
QS and THE subject rankings compared.pptx
 

Mais de Vladimir Bakhrushin

Закон про освіту
Закон про освітуЗакон про освіту
Закон про освіту
Vladimir Bakhrushin
 

Mais de Vladimir Bakhrushin (20)

Decision-making on assessment of higher education institutions under uncertainty
Decision-making on assessment of higher education institutions under uncertaintyDecision-making on assessment of higher education institutions under uncertainty
Decision-making on assessment of higher education institutions under uncertainty
 
Якими бути стандартам вищої освіти для докторів філософії
Якими бути стандартам вищої освіти для докторів філософіїЯкими бути стандартам вищої освіти для докторів філософії
Якими бути стандартам вищої освіти для докторів філософії
 
Академічна автономія і трансформація української освіти
Академічна автономія і трансформація української освітиАкадемічна автономія і трансформація української освіти
Академічна автономія і трансформація української освіти
 
Оптимізація в освіті і управлінні
Оптимізація в освіті і управлінні Оптимізація в освіті і управлінні
Оптимізація в освіті і управлінні
 
Мій 2015
Мій 2015Мій 2015
Мій 2015
 
Українські університети: Сучасні виклики та можливі відповіді
Українські університети: Сучасні виклики та можливі відповідіУкраїнські університети: Сучасні виклики та можливі відповіді
Українські університети: Сучасні виклики та можливі відповіді
 
Два проекти закону україни
Два проекти закону україниДва проекти закону україни
Два проекти закону україни
 
Окремі аспекти реформування освіти України з погляду системного підходу
Окремі аспекти реформування освіти України з погляду системного підходуОкремі аспекти реформування освіти України з погляду системного підходу
Окремі аспекти реформування освіти України з погляду системного підходу
 
Decision-making in education based on multi-criteria ranking of alternatives
Decision-making in education based on multi-criteria ranking of alternativesDecision-making in education based on multi-criteria ranking of alternatives
Decision-making in education based on multi-criteria ranking of alternatives
 
Деякі проблеми прийняття рішень в освіті
Деякі проблеми прийняття рішень в освітіДеякі проблеми прийняття рішень в освіті
Деякі проблеми прийняття рішень в освіті
 
Закон про освіту
Закон про освітуЗакон про освіту
Закон про освіту
 
Описова статистика в R
Описова статистика в RОписова статистика в R
Описова статистика в R
 
Деякі графічні засоби R
Деякі графічні засоби RДеякі графічні засоби R
Деякі графічні засоби R
 
Plot function in R
Plot function in RPlot function in R
Plot function in R
 
Функція plot() в R
Функція plot() в RФункція plot() в R
Функція plot() в R
 
Files,blocks and functions in R
Files,blocks and functions in RFiles,blocks and functions in R
Files,blocks and functions in R
 
Робота з файлами даних в R, блоки виразів, цикли, функції
Робота з файлами даних в R, блоки виразів, цикли, функціїРобота з файлами даних в R, блоки виразів, цикли, функції
Робота з файлами даних в R, блоки виразів, цикли, функції
 
Cluster analysis using k-means method in R
Cluster analysis using k-means method in RCluster analysis using k-means method in R
Cluster analysis using k-means method in R
 
Нові застосування статистичних методів в прикладних дослідженнях
Нові застосування статистичних методів в прикладних дослідженняхНові застосування статистичних методів в прикладних дослідженнях
Нові застосування статистичних методів в прикладних дослідженнях
 
Парадоксы голосования
Парадоксы голосованияПарадоксы голосования
Парадоксы голосования
 

Último

Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
fonyou31
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
heathfieldcps1
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
QucHHunhnh
 

Último (20)

General AI for Medical Educators April 2024
General AI for Medical Educators April 2024General AI for Medical Educators April 2024
General AI for Medical Educators April 2024
 
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptxSOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
SOCIAL AND HISTORICAL CONTEXT - LFTVD.pptx
 
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
 
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy ReformA Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
A Critique of the Proposed National Education Policy Reform
 
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationInteractive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
 
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajansocial pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
social pharmacy d-pharm 1st year by Pragati K. Mahajan
 
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpin
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpinStudent login on Anyboli platform.helpin
Student login on Anyboli platform.helpin
 
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SDMeasures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
Measures of Dispersion and Variability: Range, QD, AD and SD
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 
fourth grading exam for kindergarten in writing
fourth grading exam for kindergarten in writingfourth grading exam for kindergarten in writing
fourth grading exam for kindergarten in writing
 
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptxThe basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
The basics of sentences session 2pptx copy.pptx
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
 
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdfSanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
Sanyam Choudhary Chemistry practical.pdf
 
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
Call Girls in Dwarka Mor Delhi Contact Us 9654467111
 
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfWeb & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 

Statistical analysis of world university rankings (report for PDMU-2010)

  • 1. Vladimir E. Bakhrushin STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF WORLD UNIVERSITY RANKINGS Classic Private University Zaporizhjia 2010
  • 2. Different university rankings are widely used for decision making at higher education. These rankings may be common or specialized, depending of their application area. In these report the results of statistical analysis are presented for such indexes: R1 – Top 500 world universities – 2008; R2 - ARWU or Shanghai ranking- 2008; R3 – The Times Good university guide 2008 (Great Britain universities ranking); R4 - World Universities' ranking on the Web_Top 8000; R5 – Ukrainian Top-200 universities ranking (Dzerkalo Tyzhnya), etc. Two types of parameters were studied – empirical distribution functions and correlation between ranking components.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6. For R2 Alumni. The total number of the alumni of an institution winning Nobel Prizes and Fields Medals. Alumni are defined as those who obtain bachelor, Master's or doctoral degrees from the institution. Different weights are set according to the periods of obtaining degrees. The weight is 100% for alumni obtaining degrees in after 1991, 90% for alumni obtaining degrees in 1981-1990, 80% for alumni obtaining degrees in 1971-1980, and so on, and finally 10% for alumni obtaining degrees in 1901-1910. If a person obtains more than one degrees from an institution, the institution is considered once only.. Weight – 10%/
  • 7. Award. The total number of the staff of an institution winning Nobel Prizes in Physics, Chemistry, Medicine and Economics and Fields Medal in Mathematics. Staff is defined as those who work at an institution at the time of winning the prize. The weight is 100% for winners in after 2001, 90% for winners in 1991-2000, 80% for winners in 1981-1990, 70% for winners in 1971-1980, and so on, and finally 10% for winners in 1911-1920. If a winner is affiliated with more than one institution, each institution is assigned the reciprocal of the number of institutions. For Nobel prizes, if a prize is shared by more than one person, weights are set for winners according to their proportion of the prize.. Weight – 20%
  • 8. HiCi. The number of highly cited researchers in 21 subject categories. These individuals are the most highly cited within each category. The definition of categories and detailed procedures can be found at the website of Thomson ISI. Weight - 20 N&S. The number of articles published in Nature and Science between 2003 and 2007. To distinguish the order of author affiliation, a weight of 100% is assigned for corresponding author affiliation, 50% for first author affiliation (second author affiliation if the first author affiliation is the same as corresponding author affiliation), 25% for the next author affiliation, and 10% for other author affiliations. Only publications of article type are considered. Weight -20
  • 9. PUB. Total number of articles indexed in Science Citation Index-Expanded and Social Science Citation Index in 2007. Only publications of article type are considered. When calculating the total number of articles of an institution, a special weight of two was introduced for articles indexed in Social Science Citation Index. Weight – 20. PCP. The weighted scores of the above five indicators divided by the number of full-time equivalent academic staff. If the number of academic staff for institutions of a country cannot be obtained, the weighted scores of the above five indicators is used. Weight - 10
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13. Alumni = 0 18 Univ California - San Francisco 36 Univ California - Santa Barbara 46 Univ California - Irvine 48 Univ California - Davis 48 Univ Southern California 77 Univ Arizona 80 Univ Utah 88 Texas A&M Univ - Coll Station 94 Arizona State Univ - Tempe 95 Univ Virginia
  • 14. Score on awards = 0 21 Univ Michigan - Ann Arbor 32 Duke Univ 42 Pennsylvania State Univ - Univ Park 48 Univ California - Davis 52 Univ Pittsburgh - Pittsburgh 57 Univ Florida 60 McGill Univ 63 Ohio State Univ - Columbus 68 Osaka Univ 77 Univ Arizona 79 Tohoku Univ 83 Boston Univ 85 Michigan State Univ 88 Texas A&M Univ - Coll Station 95 Univ Virginia 97 Lund Univ 100 Univ Sydney
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21. Times_Top_200_2009 KS = 0,66
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 26.
  • 27.
  • 28. The Times Good university guide 2008
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33.
  • 34.
  • 35. Ukrainian Top-200 universities ranking - 2008 KS = 0,71(L); 1,66 (N)
  • 36.
  • 37. Average Staff – Total rank = -19,8 (Med); -14,0 (Agr)