Nederland en Indonesië raakten tussen 1830 en 1930 steeds nauwer met elkaar vervlochten, maar de voordelen hiervan waren zeer ongelijk verdeeld. In deze lezing wordt eerst deze groeiende vervlechting in kaart gebracht – van het Cultuurstelsel tot en met de Depressie van de jaren Dertig. Hoe pakte de koloniale relatie economisch uit in de verschillende perioden, en hoe waren politieke macht en economische welvaren (of het ontbreken daarvan) met elkaar verbonden? Daarna wordt ingegaan op de dramatisch verlopen ‘ontvlechting’ na 1945 – in welke mate profiteerde Indonesië van de beëindiging van de koloniale relatie en plukte men de vruchten van de onafhankelijkheid? En hoe verging het Nederland?
Prof.dr. Jan Luiten van Zanden is hoogleraar Global Economic History aan de Universiteit Utrecht, honorair hoogleraar Angus Maddison aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen en honorair hoogleraar aan de Universiteit van Stellenbosch. Hij werd bekroond met de Spinozapremie van NWO (2003) en de prijs Akademiehoogleraar door de KNAW (2011). Hij is ere-voorzitter van de International Economic History Association en was de belangrijkste organisator van de vijftiende World History Congress Economische in Utrecht in 2009. Zijn publicaties omvatten Economic History of Indonesia 1800-2010. Between Asian Drama and Growth Miracle. With Daan Marks, London: Routhledge, 2012 (a translation in Bahasa Indonesia has also been published in 2012); The Long Road to the Industrial Revolution. The European Economy in a Global Perspective, 1000-1800. Leiden: Brill Publishers, 2009; Nederland en het Poldermodel. Sociaal-economische Geschiedenis van Nederland, 1000-2000. With Maarten Prak. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker, 2013.
Role Of Transgenic Animal In Target Validation-1.pptx
Twee vervlochten economieen – indonesie en nederland 1830 1960
1. Two hundred years of economic
growth in Indonesia, 1800-2012
1830-1960 uitgelicht
Daan Marks and Jan Luiten van Zanden
Utrecht University
2. Introduction
• Big question of economics/economic history
• Why are some countries so rich and others
poor?
• We offer country study: Indonesia
• Basis: (very rich) archival sources Dutch
period, and literature post-Independence
period
3
3. This study
• Two reconstructions of GDP and its components
– Java, 1815-1940 (see Van Zanden 2002)
– Indonesia, 1880-2007 (see Van der Eng 2008, and also
Marks 2009)
• Additional data on wages, heights, education, income
inequality and rice prices
• Together they offer the unique opportunity to analyse
the determinants of long-run growth for a developing
country over a period of almost two centuries.
4
4. 5
GDP per capita in the Netherlands, Indonesia and Engeland 1820-2008
(dollars 1990)
100
1000
10000
100000
1820 1870 1920 1970
Indonesia Netherlands Java Engeland/UK
5. Divergence and catching up
• In 1820 already large gap: GDP per capita Java 500-
550 dollar; Netherlands/England: c. 2000 dollar 1990
(1 : 4)
• Increased gap: 1900: Java 670 versus, Neth/England:
4000 (1 : 6)
• 1970: Indonesia 1200 dollar versus Neth./England:
12000 (1 : 10)
• Catching up since 1970: 2008: Indonesia 4200 versus
Neth./England 24000 (1:7)
• Indonesia: * 8 increase GDP per capita; Netherlands *
12 increase GDP per capita
6
6. Other measures of living standard:
Heights: slow or no progress
7
152.0
154.0
156.0
158.0
160.0
162.0
164.0
166.0
168.0
1890 1910 1930 1950 1970 1990
Java vs Outer Islands
Java & Madura Outer Provinces Baten et al. (2009)
7. Phases of development
9
GDP per capita Java/Indonesia 1820-2008 (dollars 1990)
100
1000
10000
1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Liberal
policies
Cultivation
System
Ethical
Policy
Depression
1930s
Japanese
Occupation
Sukarno
Suharto's
New Order
Financial
Crisis
1998
8. Regime changes
• 1830: introduction Cultivation System
• 1860s: introduction liberal policies
• 1890s: Ethical Policy
• 1920s: return to conservative colonial policy
• 1950s: experiments with democracy
• 1968-1972: transition to New Order
• 1998: democratic reforms
9. Analysis book
• Why regime changes?
• Why switch from Cultivation System to Liberal
Policies? Why Ethical Policy?
• Why failure of democracy under Sukarno?
• Why Asian crisis resulting in change towards
democracy?
• Interactions between economics and politics
10. How did Indonesia compare with rest
of the world?
13
GDP per capita, Indonesia/Java compared with the world (1880=100)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Indonesia/world
Java/world
12. Cultivation System 1830-1870
• Introduced 1830, Joh. Van den Bosch
• Forced cultivation of cash crops (sugar, coffee)
• Payment of plantloon
• To pay for land rent
• Also coerced labour in transport
• Building on indigenous traditions: coffee
Priangan
• Cooperation with local elites
15
13. Cultivation system 1830-1870
• Successful in generating more exports
• But at expense of efficiency (planned
economy) and consumption
• Almost no growth 1830-1870
• Large income transfers (batig slot) to
Netherlands
• Some industries profit a lot, and the state
• Reforms 1840s onwards towards more liberal
economy 16
15. Gradual transition to more liberal
policies
• Not government but private entreprise central actor
in economic modernization
• Plantations on Java (tea), and ‘Outer islands’
(tobacco Deli)
• Consolidation territorial control (‘modern
imperialism’)
• Relative decline of trade between NL and Ind
• Instead: capital and skilled labour
• Modernization transport (railways, shipping)
• ‘Closer’ to NL: Suez-canal 1869
18
21. Debate at about 1900
• ‘Declining welfare’ of Indonesian
population/peasantry
• Growing criticism in NL
• 1901: Ethical Policy: aim colonial project is to raise
living standard of population
• Welfare services: education, health, agricultural
services, credit & saving
• Changes in taxation system: tax farming via Chinese -
direct taxation; reform opium tax
• Volksraad 1918: limited self-governance
24
23. Limitations ‘developmental’ project
• Start form very low beginnings (for example literacy 1920:
6,5% men, 0,5% women)
• ‘western innovations’ did not work in different context
(Raifeissen-cooperatives)
• Budget deficits 1917-1923, followed by turn to the ‘right’ in
1920s
• Volksraad did not get real power
• No accommodation of nationalistic movement
• Bad monetary policies in 1930s (gold standard)
• But de-globalization/protectionism led to modest industrial
growth
26
24. 27
Income and Expenditure of Colonial Government, 1900-1940
0
200.000
400.000
600.000
800.000
1.000.000
1.200.000
1900 1902 1904 1906 1908 1910 1912 1914 1916 1918 1920 1922 1924 1926 1928 1930 1932 1934 1936 1938 1940
Expenditure
Income
25. From Dutch perspective
• Indonesia increasingly important: 40% of FDI
and 8% of GNI (in 1938)
• Large corporations such as Royal Dutch Shell
or NHM dependent on colony;
• Close networks of
colonial/commercial/political elites: Colijn as
an example
• Inequality: Dutch interests protected in
Indonesia, but not vice versa
28
26. Difficult independence
• Too much at stake for Dutch elite (‘rang van
Denemarken’)
• Problems of two nations after war &
occupation; for example: the Dutch needed
foreign exchange from Indonesia (oil, rubber)
• No recognition of Independence movement as
offering viable alternative
• After 1949: continued dominance of strategic
sectors of Indonesian economy
29
27. Ontvlechting 1950s
• After 1949: continued dominance of strategic sectors of
Indonesian economy
• Increasingly ‘nationalistic’ policies to further
Indonesianisasi (Benteng program)
• Leads to tension between Java and other regions in
1950s
• Transition of ‘guided democracy’ in 1958
• Consolidation of power Sukarno
• Conflict about Irian Jaya results in nationalization of
Dutch assets and emigration of remaining Dutch citizens
(1958/59)
30
28. Phases of development
31
GDP per capita Java/Indonesia 1820-2008 (dollars 1990)
100
1000
10000
1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Liberal
policies
Cultivation
System
Ethical
Policy
Depression
1930s
Japanese
Occupation
Sukarno
Suharto's
New Order
Financial
Crisis
1998
29. Conclusions
• 1830-1940: steeds verder vervlechting
• 1830-1870: directe handel en exploitatie
• 1870-1940: investeringen in Indonesie en
menselijk kapitaal (administratie en
ondernemerschap)
• Na 1942: Ontvlechting door oorlog en
conservatieve reflex NL
• NL had er onverwacht weinig problemen mee
• Ind wist na 1967 succesvolle weg
modernisering in te slaan