The impact of holistic vs. analytic thinking styles on anchoring effect and c...
Research on Cognitive Dissonance and the Benjamin Franklin Effect
1. Cognitive Dissonance theory and the Benjamin Franklin Effect: The
influence on individuals’ tendencies to perform favors
Vanessa Curro, Gabrielle Rosa, Vanessa Wright
Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut
• This study examined the likelihood
of individuals to perform favors in
order to reduce cognitive
dissonance.
• The Ben Franklin effect proposes
that doing a favor for someone will
increase your liking towards them,
and will also lead to a greater
likelihood that you will perform
subsequent favors in the future.
• Schopler and Compere (1971)
found that people act more
positively towards each other when
they receive positive feedback.
Current Study:
Participants played a hypothetical
Investment Game and were either
placed in condition 1: favor/
experimental condition and condition
2: control condition.
Hypotheses:
• Participants in the favor condition,
will be more likely to perform
subsequent favors than
participants in the control
condition.
• Females in the experimental
condition will choose to gift more
money throughout the Investment
Game than males.
Participants:
35 participants enrolled in PSYC
1100,1103, AND 2100WQ at the
UCONN Storrs campus.
Materials:
• Barrier
• Investment game instructions:
favor vs. control prompt
• Investment game worksheet
• Post-survey consisting of 8
multiple choice questions and 1
open ended question
• Pencil for dropping
Procedure:
• Participants were assigned to
either give a “gift” to the
confederate, or to not give a
“gift.”
• Participants played the
Investment game for three
rounds with a confederate.
Participants had to allot an
investment amount to be shared
between the confederate and
him or herself and a gift amount
that would benefit the other
participant (confederate).
• After three rounds, the
participant was given the post-
survey, during which the
confederate dropped a pencil to
see if the participant would pick
it up.
• Female participants in the
experimental condition gifted a
higher overall amount
throughout the game than
males in the experimental
condition.
• The data shows that there is no
main effect of condition on the
likelihood to perform
subsequent favors.
Implications:
• Females are more likely to
perform favors and
• Imposing the performance of a
favor does not appear to cause
them to choose to perform
future favors.
References
Schopler, J., & Compere, J. S. (1971). Effects of
being kind or harsh to another on liking. Journal
Of Personality And Social Psychology, 20(2),
155-159.
RESULTS
• A between subjects factorial
ANOVA was conducted on the
effects of the likelihood of a
participant to pick up a pencil based
upon their gender and favor
condition (experimental or control).
A main effect of gender was found
for the likelihood of picking up the
pencil, p=.008, p<.05.
• When prompted to give an initial gift
in the experimental group, females
were more likely to give higher gift
amounts. (M= 133.33, SD= 34.11),
while males, (M=100.00,
SD=34.108).
• In the control group, males were
more likely to give higher gift
amounts, (M= 314.29, SD=38.68),
while females, (M=220.00,
SD=32.36 ).
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
female male
AmountinDollars
Quasi Independent Varaible
Figure 1: The Amount Chosen to Gift on the Differing Conditions
Control
Experiment
DISCUSSIONMETHODINTRODUCTION