SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 1
Cognitive Dissonance theory and the Benjamin Franklin Effect: The
influence on individuals’ tendencies to perform favors
Vanessa Curro, Gabrielle Rosa, Vanessa Wright
Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut
• This study examined the likelihood
of individuals to perform favors in
order to reduce cognitive
dissonance.
• The Ben Franklin effect proposes
that doing a favor for someone will
increase your liking towards them,
and will also lead to a greater
likelihood that you will perform
subsequent favors in the future.
• Schopler and Compere (1971)
found that people act more
positively towards each other when
they receive positive feedback.
Current Study:
Participants played a hypothetical
Investment Game and were either
placed in condition 1: favor/
experimental condition and condition
2: control condition.
Hypotheses:
• Participants in the favor condition,
will be more likely to perform
subsequent favors than
participants in the control
condition.
• Females in the experimental
condition will choose to gift more
money throughout the Investment
Game than males.
Participants:
35 participants enrolled in PSYC
1100,1103, AND 2100WQ at the
UCONN Storrs campus.
Materials:
• Barrier
• Investment game instructions:
favor vs. control prompt
• Investment game worksheet
• Post-survey consisting of 8
multiple choice questions and 1
open ended question
• Pencil for dropping
Procedure:
• Participants were assigned to
either give a “gift” to the
confederate, or to not give a
“gift.”
• Participants played the
Investment game for three
rounds with a confederate.
Participants had to allot an
investment amount to be shared
between the confederate and
him or herself and a gift amount
that would benefit the other
participant (confederate).
• After three rounds, the
participant was given the post-
survey, during which the
confederate dropped a pencil to
see if the participant would pick
it up.
• Female participants in the
experimental condition gifted a
higher overall amount
throughout the game than
males in the experimental
condition.
• The data shows that there is no
main effect of condition on the
likelihood to perform
subsequent favors.
Implications:
• Females are more likely to
perform favors and
• Imposing the performance of a
favor does not appear to cause
them to choose to perform
future favors.
References
Schopler, J., & Compere, J. S. (1971). Effects of
being kind or harsh to another on liking. Journal
Of Personality And Social Psychology, 20(2),
155-159.
RESULTS
• A between subjects factorial
ANOVA was conducted on the
effects of the likelihood of a
participant to pick up a pencil based
upon their gender and favor
condition (experimental or control).
A main effect of gender was found
for the likelihood of picking up the
pencil, p=.008, p<.05.
• When prompted to give an initial gift
in the experimental group, females
were more likely to give higher gift
amounts. (M= 133.33, SD= 34.11),
while males, (M=100.00,
SD=34.108).
• In the control group, males were
more likely to give higher gift
amounts, (M= 314.29, SD=38.68),
while females, (M=220.00,
SD=32.36 ).
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
female male
AmountinDollars
Quasi Independent Varaible
Figure 1: The Amount Chosen to Gift on the Differing Conditions
Control
Experiment
DISCUSSIONMETHODINTRODUCTION

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Destaque

Cognitive Dissonance theory
Cognitive Dissonance theory Cognitive Dissonance theory
Cognitive Dissonance theory CesDuca
 
Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance Vinu Arpitha
 
Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive DissonanceCognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonanceazanaboni
 
Cognitive Dissonance Theory
Cognitive Dissonance TheoryCognitive Dissonance Theory
Cognitive Dissonance TheoryRohit Rohan
 
Cognitive Dissonance Theory
Cognitive Dissonance TheoryCognitive Dissonance Theory
Cognitive Dissonance TheoryArun Jacob
 

Destaque (9)

COGNITIVE DISSONANCE THEORY
COGNITIVE DISSONANCE THEORYCOGNITIVE DISSONANCE THEORY
COGNITIVE DISSONANCE THEORY
 
Cognitive Dissonance theory
Cognitive Dissonance theory Cognitive Dissonance theory
Cognitive Dissonance theory
 
Part III: Changing Attitudes & Behavior
Part III: Changing Attitudes & BehaviorPart III: Changing Attitudes & Behavior
Part III: Changing Attitudes & Behavior
 
Unit 14
Unit 14Unit 14
Unit 14
 
Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance
 
Cognitive Dissonance
Cognitive DissonanceCognitive Dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance
 
Cognitive Dissonance Theory
Cognitive Dissonance TheoryCognitive Dissonance Theory
Cognitive Dissonance Theory
 
Cognitive Dissonance Theory
Cognitive Dissonance TheoryCognitive Dissonance Theory
Cognitive Dissonance Theory
 
Cognitive dissonance theory
Cognitive dissonance theoryCognitive dissonance theory
Cognitive dissonance theory
 

Semelhante a Research on Cognitive Dissonance and the Benjamin Franklin Effect

Research Design Group paper.docmidnight
Research Design Group paper.docmidnightResearch Design Group paper.docmidnight
Research Design Group paper.docmidnightGwen Knight
 
Research paper GSR100C (2)
Research paper GSR100C (2)Research paper GSR100C (2)
Research paper GSR100C (2)Pablo Jimenez
 
Debriefing form
Debriefing formDebriefing form
Debriefing formsz5cc
 
Brennan_Kaitlyn_Arestyposter
Brennan_Kaitlyn_ArestyposterBrennan_Kaitlyn_Arestyposter
Brennan_Kaitlyn_ArestyposterKaitlyn Brennan
 
Senior Thesis Presentation (VAAS and NU)
Senior Thesis Presentation (VAAS and NU)Senior Thesis Presentation (VAAS and NU)
Senior Thesis Presentation (VAAS and NU)Chandler Sullivan
 
Final Proposal Truly
Final Proposal TrulyFinal Proposal Truly
Final Proposal TrulyMika Truly
 
The Contributions of Teaching Type and Perceived Task Difficulty on Competency
The Contributions of Teaching Type and Perceived Task Difficulty on CompetencyThe Contributions of Teaching Type and Perceived Task Difficulty on Competency
The Contributions of Teaching Type and Perceived Task Difficulty on CompetencySasha Albrecht
 
APS Conference Presentation 2016
APS Conference Presentation 2016APS Conference Presentation 2016
APS Conference Presentation 2016Kendrick Settler
 
WrenFINALposter
WrenFINALposterWrenFINALposter
WrenFINALpostershywren
 
Psy intro to research methods reading
Psy intro to research methods readingPsy intro to research methods reading
Psy intro to research methods readingRobert Matek
 
Stereotypes 2018
Stereotypes 2018Stereotypes 2018
Stereotypes 2018abonica
 
Lecture 3 core concepts
Lecture 3 core conceptsLecture 3 core concepts
Lecture 3 core conceptsJohn Bradford
 
Conformity Topic In Social Psychology.pptx
Conformity Topic In Social Psychology.pptxConformity Topic In Social Psychology.pptx
Conformity Topic In Social Psychology.pptxNurVural3
 
Psychology project
Psychology projectPsychology project
Psychology projectChong Teo
 
Psychology project
Psychology projectPsychology project
Psychology projectszelun
 
The impact of holistic vs. analytic thinking styles on anchoring effect and c...
The impact of holistic vs. analytic thinking styles on anchoring effect and c...The impact of holistic vs. analytic thinking styles on anchoring effect and c...
The impact of holistic vs. analytic thinking styles on anchoring effect and c...Jingdan "Diana" Zhu
 

Semelhante a Research on Cognitive Dissonance and the Benjamin Franklin Effect (20)

Research Design Group paper.docmidnight
Research Design Group paper.docmidnightResearch Design Group paper.docmidnight
Research Design Group paper.docmidnight
 
research
researchresearch
research
 
Econ430FinalPaper
Econ430FinalPaperEcon430FinalPaper
Econ430FinalPaper
 
Research paper GSR100C (2)
Research paper GSR100C (2)Research paper GSR100C (2)
Research paper GSR100C (2)
 
Debriefing form
Debriefing formDebriefing form
Debriefing form
 
Brennan_Kaitlyn_Arestyposter
Brennan_Kaitlyn_ArestyposterBrennan_Kaitlyn_Arestyposter
Brennan_Kaitlyn_Arestyposter
 
Senior Thesis Presentation (VAAS and NU)
Senior Thesis Presentation (VAAS and NU)Senior Thesis Presentation (VAAS and NU)
Senior Thesis Presentation (VAAS and NU)
 
Final Proposal Truly
Final Proposal TrulyFinal Proposal Truly
Final Proposal Truly
 
The Contributions of Teaching Type and Perceived Task Difficulty on Competency
The Contributions of Teaching Type and Perceived Task Difficulty on CompetencyThe Contributions of Teaching Type and Perceived Task Difficulty on Competency
The Contributions of Teaching Type and Perceived Task Difficulty on Competency
 
APS Conference Presentation 2016
APS Conference Presentation 2016APS Conference Presentation 2016
APS Conference Presentation 2016
 
WrenFINALposter
WrenFINALposterWrenFINALposter
WrenFINALposter
 
Presentation
PresentationPresentation
Presentation
 
Psy intro to research methods reading
Psy intro to research methods readingPsy intro to research methods reading
Psy intro to research methods reading
 
Stereotypes 2018
Stereotypes 2018Stereotypes 2018
Stereotypes 2018
 
Lecture 3 core concepts
Lecture 3 core conceptsLecture 3 core concepts
Lecture 3 core concepts
 
Conformity Topic In Social Psychology.pptx
Conformity Topic In Social Psychology.pptxConformity Topic In Social Psychology.pptx
Conformity Topic In Social Psychology.pptx
 
Final Expo Poster Psych
Final Expo Poster PsychFinal Expo Poster Psych
Final Expo Poster Psych
 
Psychology project
Psychology projectPsychology project
Psychology project
 
Psychology project
Psychology projectPsychology project
Psychology project
 
The impact of holistic vs. analytic thinking styles on anchoring effect and c...
The impact of holistic vs. analytic thinking styles on anchoring effect and c...The impact of holistic vs. analytic thinking styles on anchoring effect and c...
The impact of holistic vs. analytic thinking styles on anchoring effect and c...
 

Research on Cognitive Dissonance and the Benjamin Franklin Effect

  • 1. Cognitive Dissonance theory and the Benjamin Franklin Effect: The influence on individuals’ tendencies to perform favors Vanessa Curro, Gabrielle Rosa, Vanessa Wright Department of Psychology, University of Connecticut • This study examined the likelihood of individuals to perform favors in order to reduce cognitive dissonance. • The Ben Franklin effect proposes that doing a favor for someone will increase your liking towards them, and will also lead to a greater likelihood that you will perform subsequent favors in the future. • Schopler and Compere (1971) found that people act more positively towards each other when they receive positive feedback. Current Study: Participants played a hypothetical Investment Game and were either placed in condition 1: favor/ experimental condition and condition 2: control condition. Hypotheses: • Participants in the favor condition, will be more likely to perform subsequent favors than participants in the control condition. • Females in the experimental condition will choose to gift more money throughout the Investment Game than males. Participants: 35 participants enrolled in PSYC 1100,1103, AND 2100WQ at the UCONN Storrs campus. Materials: • Barrier • Investment game instructions: favor vs. control prompt • Investment game worksheet • Post-survey consisting of 8 multiple choice questions and 1 open ended question • Pencil for dropping Procedure: • Participants were assigned to either give a “gift” to the confederate, or to not give a “gift.” • Participants played the Investment game for three rounds with a confederate. Participants had to allot an investment amount to be shared between the confederate and him or herself and a gift amount that would benefit the other participant (confederate). • After three rounds, the participant was given the post- survey, during which the confederate dropped a pencil to see if the participant would pick it up. • Female participants in the experimental condition gifted a higher overall amount throughout the game than males in the experimental condition. • The data shows that there is no main effect of condition on the likelihood to perform subsequent favors. Implications: • Females are more likely to perform favors and • Imposing the performance of a favor does not appear to cause them to choose to perform future favors. References Schopler, J., & Compere, J. S. (1971). Effects of being kind or harsh to another on liking. Journal Of Personality And Social Psychology, 20(2), 155-159. RESULTS • A between subjects factorial ANOVA was conducted on the effects of the likelihood of a participant to pick up a pencil based upon their gender and favor condition (experimental or control). A main effect of gender was found for the likelihood of picking up the pencil, p=.008, p<.05. • When prompted to give an initial gift in the experimental group, females were more likely to give higher gift amounts. (M= 133.33, SD= 34.11), while males, (M=100.00, SD=34.108). • In the control group, males were more likely to give higher gift amounts, (M= 314.29, SD=38.68), while females, (M=220.00, SD=32.36 ). 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 female male AmountinDollars Quasi Independent Varaible Figure 1: The Amount Chosen to Gift on the Differing Conditions Control Experiment DISCUSSIONMETHODINTRODUCTION

Notas do Editor

  1. Intro section: Try to streamline text even more.