Powerpoint from textbook Business Law - the ethical, global, and e-commerce environment to accompany BA 330 course at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.
4. Learning Objectives
Nature of contracts
Basic elements of a contract
Basic contract types
Non-contract obligations
9-4
5. Contracts
Not every promise is legally enforceable
But when a set of promises has the status of
contract, a person injured by a breach of that
contract is entitled to call on the government
(courts) to force the breaching party to honor
the contract
Contract law is ancient law, but has evolved
to reflect social change
9-5
6. Elements of a Contract
(1) agreement (2) between competent parties
(3) based on genuine assent of the parties
that is (4) supported by consideration, (5)
made for a lawful purpose, and (6) in the
form required by law, if any
See Figure 1, page 292
9-6
7. Lambert v. Barron
Facts:
Lambert and Barron had friendly as well as professional
relationship
Barron had financial troubles, so Lambert flew from
New Orleans to Farmerville to meet with Barron
Lambert claims that he and Barron orally contracted for
Lambert to provide consulting services for one year at a
monthly rate of $3100
Barron paid one invoice, but refused to pay on a second,
claiming that he had not agreed to such a price or term
9-7
8. Lambert v. Barron
Procedural History and Issue:
Lambert sued for breach of contract and lost
Issue on appeal: was there a valid contract?
Trial Court Ruling:
Two competing views without evidence that
contract was formed or that substantive business
benefit was realized by Barron from his friend
No contract formed, lower court ruling affirmed
9-8
9. Contract Concepts and Types
Bilateral contracts: two parties make
promises to one another
Unilateral contracts: one party makes a
promise
Frequent buyer cards are offers for unilateral
contracts; gaining points on the cards accept
the offer and create a contract
9-9
10. Contract Concepts and Types
Valid contract: binding and enforceable
agreement
Voidable contract: agreement otherwise
binding, but due to circumstances
surrounding execution or lack of capacity,
may be rejected at option of one party
Void contract: agreement without legal effect
because prohibited by law
9 - 10
11. Contract Concepts and Types
Express contract: agreement of parties
manifested by words, written or oral
Implied contract: agreement not shown by
words, but by acts and conduct of parties
Difference between express & implied
contracts relates to manner of proving the
existence of the contract, not the effect; one
or the other arises
9 - 11
12. Sources of Governing Law
Two bodies of law govern contracts:
Article 2 of Uniform Commercial Code
Common law of contracts
Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) is
statutory law in every state, but the
common law of contracts is evolving
UCC contains nine articles
9 - 12
13. UCC Article 2
Article 2 expressly applies to contracts for the
sale of goods [2–102] (numbers in brackets
refer to specific Code sections)
UCC [1–105]: goods are tangible, movable,
personal property
Does not apply to sale of services, intangible
property (stocks, intellectual property), or
real estate
9 - 13
14. The UCC and
Hybrid Contracts
Many contracts involve goods and services
Test that courts most frequently apply to
decide whether Article 2 applies is to ask
which element – goods or services –
predominates in the contract
See Pass v. Shelby Aviation
9 - 14
16. International Contract Law
United Nations Convention on Contracts
for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) is
body of contract rules that harmonizes
contract principles from many legal systems
Seventy-one nations, including the United
States and Canada, are parties to the CISG
See
UN Commission on International Trade Law
website
9 - 16
17. International Contract Law
CISG automatically
applies to a contract for
the sale of goods
between commercial
parties from nations
that agreed to the CISG
unless the parties
expressly opt out of the
CISG in their contract
9 - 17
18. Non-Contract Obligations
Sometimes the law enforces an obligation to
pay for certain losses or benefits even in the
absence of mutual agreement and exchange
of value; the court then applies:
Quasi-contract theory
Promissory estoppel
9 - 18
19. Quasi-Contract Theory
Quasi-contract is an obligation imposed by
law to prevent unjust enrichment of one
party in certain circumstances
E.g., work performed by painter thinking work
justified by contract & other party, who receives
benefit of work, denies work was justified
E.g., minor buys something but wrecks it,
agreement is void by law, but the minor must
pay the damages
9 - 19
20. Quasi-Contract Remedies
Plaintiff recovers either the reasonable value
of the benefit conferred on the defendant
(reasonable price) or value of labor (quantum
meruit)
9 - 20
21. Promissory Estoppel
A court may apply doctrine of promissory
estoppel when one party relies upon another
party’s promise to his or her detriment
(detrimental reliance), but there’s no contract
Court will force promisor to fulfill
promise or pay compensation
Example: Holt v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
9 - 21
22. Holt v. Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.
Facts & Procedural History:
Holt was a Home Depot manager for four years
Home Depot assured employees that an open-
door policy allowed complaints to management
about supervisors without penalty
Home Depot moved Holt and family to
Connecticut, but soon after, Holt began to have
difficulties with his immediate supervisor
Holt told a senior manager about the problems
Called Impact Line to begin formal complaint
Six days later, Home Depot fired Holt
9 - 22
23. Holt v. Home Depot, U.S.A.,
Inc.
Procedural History:
Holt sued claiming promissory estoppel
Jury found for Holt, awarding $467,000 damages
Appellate Decision and Ruling:
Jury could reasonably find that Home Depot’s
promise not to retaliate against employees was so
clear and emphatic that Holt could reasonably
believe it was inviolable; evidence indicated Holt
terminated because of complaint about supervisor
9 - 23
25. Test Your Knowledge
True=A, False = B
Every promise is legally enforceable
The main element of a contract is fairness
In a bilateral contract, two parties make
promises to one another
The UCC is statutory law in every state
The UCC applies to the sale of goods and
services
9 - 25
26. Test Your Knowledge
Multiple Choice
A void contract refers to an agreement that is:
(a) Binding and enforceable agreement
(b) Otherwise binding, but due to
circumstances surrounding execution or lack
of capacity, may be rejected at option of one
party
(c) Without legal effect because prohibited by
law
9 - 26
27. Test Your Knowledge
Multiple Choice
Non-contract obligations include all of the
following except:
(a) Quasi-contract theory
(b) Promissory estoppel
(c) The CISG doctrine
(d) Quantum meruit
9 - 27
28. Thought Question
What contracts have you entered into
recently?
9 - 28
Notas do Editor
Donald Lambert and Don Barron were friends and had a long-standing professional relationship based on their public service together on the Louisiana State Board of Licensed Contractors from the 1980s. In 1998, Barron’s business began experiencing financial strain. Barron and Lambert talked by phone during the summer of 1998 about Barron’s personal problems and financial difficulties, and Lambert was concerned about his friend’s depressed mental state. On November 11, 1998, Lambert flew from New Orleans to Farmerville to meet with Barron. Prior to Lambert’s flight, Barron’s employee had faxed and overnighted copies of various construction contracts and correspondence relating to Barron’s problematic construction projects for Lambert to review. Lambert contends that, while standing on the airport runway before he boarded the plane for his return trip home that day, he and Barron contracted for Lambert to provide consulting services for Barron. Lambert told Barron at that time that he customarily charged his clients $3,100 per month, and the minimum term for his services was one year. He also charged 10 percent of any amount recouped by his clients in settlement. In late 2000, Lambert billed Barron for a $34,100 balance owed on the alleged oral contract. Lambert’s letter dated October 30, 2000, requested payment and stated, “I have preformed (sic) my service for you and I must request that you pay me the balance due me of $34,100.” Two weeks later, Barron wrote Lambert a letter rejecting the claim. Lambert sued. The trial court dismissed Lambert’s suit, and Lambert appealed.
Court: “This case involves the special setting of parties with a prior friendship and the aid and advice freely given between friends that existed before Lambert first broached the subject of a consulting contract…. From our review of the testimony of the two men, we also conclude that there was no clear agreement given by Barron…. Absent a direct oral or written acceptance by Barron, Lambert’s proof of the contract rests on his receipt of certain documentation of Barron’s troubled construction projects and invoices for consulting fees sent to Barron. The bulk of the documentation regarding Barron’s five construction projects was forwarded to Lambert days before the Farmerville meeting. Lambert’s review of the details of those construction contracts and Barron’s problems with the projects would have been performed in preparation for the Farmerville meeting without any contract binding his friend. More importantly, Barron provided Lambert that documentation without any indication that his friend’s review of the projects would require compensation…. From our review of this evidence, we find that the trial court could determine that no tacit acceptance of Lambert’s offer for services was made by Barron. Particularly lacking from the record is evidence of any substantive business benefit realized by Barron from his consultant friend. The trial court ultimately held that the parties’ relationship was that of a “friend helping a friend,” such that Lambert could not have reasonably believed that a contract had been formed.”
Click to add notes
Click to add notes
Click to add notes
Click to add notes
Number of CISG parties as of 11-20-08. Hyperlink is to the CISG texts on the UN Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) website.
Click to add notes
Click to add notes
Hyperlink is to the opinion (pdf format) on the court’s website.
Click to add notes
False. False. The elements include (1) agreement (offer and acceptance) (2) between competent parties (3) based on genuine assent of the parties that is (4) supported by consideration, (5) made for a lawful purpose, and (6) in the form required by law, if any . True. True. False. The UCC applies ONLY to the sale of goods.
The correct answer is (c). (a) refers to a valid contract. (b) refers to a voidable contract.
The correct answer is (c). The CISG is an international body of law regarding the sale of goods.
Opportunity to discuss the contracting each person does almost every day.