3. BKKs 00
CONTENT
Introduction Bangkok was ... Bangkok is ... Bangkok will ...
Bangkok with the world 1782-1852 The consequences Confrontation
Bangkok with the satellite 1853-1885 Past assembled present The probable scenario
Bankok with Thailand 1886-1934 The challenge Repetitous experiences
Bangkok with its government 1935-1959 Conditions of MTS The desirable sc enario
Bangkok with London 1960-1990 Conditions of historic cores Research question
Bangkok with its portrait Urban growth The dual city Essential components
Bangkok with the reality Development planning system Relevant theories
Bangkok with built-up areas Urban development Project positioning
Transportation Possible intervention
The interrelation Bangkok in 2030
What is next?
Source : www.flickr.com
5. BANGKOK ‘S PROFILE BKKs 01
WITH THE WORLD
Shanghai Tokyo
13,447,000 12,790,000
Bangkok
10,161,694
Kuala lumpur Singapore
7,300,000 5,000,000
Jakarta
8,500,000
Bangkok Metropolitan Region[BMR]
Thailand
Source : www.mapofworld.com
6. BANGKOK ‘S PROFILE BKKs 01
WITH THE SATELLITE
40 km
20 km
Source : www.earth.google.com
7. BANGKOK ‘S PROFILE BKKs 01
WITH THAILAND
350%
0.3%
BMA:72%
20%
BMR:28%
99.7% 50%
BMA:80% 1%
BMR:20% 80%
50%
Area GDP Population Density
Source : Bangkok assessment report(2008), www.nationalgeographic.com
8. N
N
N BANGKOK ‘S PROFILE BKKs 01
GOVERNMENTAL POLICIES W
W
Regional and Bangkok
W
Vision
N
E
N
E
E
N
W W
First city W
CBD
Second city
W Commercial center
E
Third city Community center
S
S
S S
S
S
S
Source : Bangkok planning standard(2010)
9. BANGKOK ‘S PROFILE BKKs 01
WITH LONDON
Head
London, England BANGKOK, Thailand
Population : 7,825,200 Population : 10,161,694
Area : 1,572 sq.km. Area : 1,568 sq.km.
Density : 4,978 people/sq.km. Density : 5,258 people/sq.km.
Source : UK office of National statistics
10. BANGKOK ‘S PROFILE BKKs 01
WITH ITS PORTRAITS
Bangkok’s icons
1. Siam paragon 1 2 3
2. Khaosan road
3. Traffic congestion
4. The grand palace
5. Jatujak outdoor market
6. Food vendors and motorcycle
taxi
7. Skyline
8. Suvarnabhumi airport
9. Bangkok rapid mass transit
system
4 5 6
7 8 9
Source : www.flickr.com
11. BANGKOK ‘S PROFILE BKKs 01
WITH THE REALITY
Area 7,761.50 sq.km. Concentration of urban population
Inhabitants 11,971,000 ppl
Registered 5,695,956 ppl
Density 4,051 ppl/sq.m.
Non-Urban population :
Districts 50 42,802,000
Infrastructure
Airport 2 Urban population : 50 Districts
19,361,000 0 km. 10 km.
Port 1
Population of Bangkok Metropolitan :
Highways 6 11,971,000
Expressways 8
Subway 1
Rail system 4,346 km.
Population Density (person/sq.m.)
Bus 7,064 More than 30,000
Minivan 5,519 25,000 - 30,000
Population of Bangkok 20,000 - 25,000
Water bus 9 15,000 - 20,000
10,000 - 15,000
Facilities Density 5,000 - 10,000
Governance Paliament
Education 45 universities
Expo/ Conference 4
Park 16
Economic Stock market,
CBD, internat- Infrastuctures
Main Highway
ional offices Registered East-Asians Indian
Population (Thai) Toll way (Motor way)
International Embassies Non-registered Expressway
Population (Thai) Thai-Chinese Others Ring road
Metro
Infrastructure Airport link rail
Source : Department of Interior(website)
12. BANGKOK ‘S PROFILE BKKs 01
WITH BUILT-UP AREAS
Head
40x20 km. BMA landuse plan
Legend
Living
Low density residential area
(51.12%)
Medium density residential area
High density residential area
Commercial area
Industrial area Working & Facilities
Cargo area (7.74%)
Country-side &Agriculture protected area
Country-side &Agriculture area
Protected area
Governance area Landscape
Public space
(41.15%)
Source : Bangkok Comprehensive Plan
14. WHAT DID BANGKOK LOOK IN THE PAST? BKKs 02
1782-1852
Estrablishment of orginal Bangkok
Infrastructure Built up area
Built-up area Water
Source : : Committee for the Conservation and Development of Krung Rattanakosin and The Old Towns(2004)
15. WHAT DID BANGKOK LOOK IN THE PAST? BKKs 02
1853-1885
1st modernization wave
Infrastructure Built up area
Built-up area Water Road
Source : Committee for the Conservation and Development of Krung Rattanakosin and The Old Towns(2004)
16. WHAT DID BANGKOK LOOK IN THE PAST? BKKs 02
1886-1934
City expansion with transportation structures
Infrastructure Built up area
Built-up area Water Road Train
Source : Committee for the Conservation and Development of Krung Rattanakosin and The Old Towns(2004)
17. WHAT DID BANGKOK LOOK IN THE PAST? BKKs 02
1935-1959
Road network development
Infrastructure Built up area
Built-up area Water Road Train
Source : Committee for the Conservation and Development of Krung Rattanakosin and The Old Towns(2004)
18. WHAT DID BANGKOK LOOK IN THE PAST? BKKs 02
1960-1990
Urban development and landuse change
Infrastructure Built up area
Built-up area Water Road Train
Source : Committee for the Conservation and Development of Krung Rattanakosin and The Old Towns(2004)
19. WHAT DID BANGKOK LOOK IN THE PAST? BKKs 02
URBAN GROWTH
A Establishment of Original B 1st Modernization wave C City Expansion withTransporta- D Road Network Development Suburb Development and
E Land use Change(1960- 990)
Bangkok( 782- 852)
1 1 ( 852- 885)
1 1 tion Structure( 886- 934)
1 1 ( 935- 959)
1 1 1
A B C D E
C
A
D
E
B
Source : www.flickr.com, R. Kanjanapanyakom(2008)
20. WHAT DID BANGKOK LOOK IN THE PAST? BKKs 02
P L A N N I N SYSTEM
PLANNING G
PATTERN
Water-Based Transport
Governance
and Walking Period Transport Modernisation Period Modernisation Period
Stratigies (Rama I-IV) (Rama V-VIII) (Rama IX)
Areas
Establishment of Original 1st Modernization wave City Expansion withTransporta- Road Network Development Suburb Development and
Outcome Bangkok( 782- 852)
1 1 tion Structure( 886- 934)
1 1 ( 935- 959)
1 1 Land use Change( 960- 990)
1 1
( 852- 885)
1 1
Governance Absolute Monarchy Constitutional Monarchy
Implementation/ Kings, Royal Government of Kings, Royal Government of Kings, Royal Government of Kings, Royal Government of Kings, Royal Government of
leader Thailand Thailand Thailand Thailand Thailand
Master Plan - Chakri ‘s Dynastry Plan for Dusit Area Road network develop- Greater Bangkok’90
/Plans Revolution ment plan Social Economic Develop-
ment Plan 1960
General Plan’92
Vision Rebuilding of Modernization of Modernization of - -
Ayutthaya Bangkok Bangkok
Scope and
Coverage Old castle Bangkok Dusit Area Nationwide Bangkok
Planning tool Smoke control (temples and Height control(partially) Height control(partially) Building code, Zonning
factories) Minimun open space ratio,
Material control,
Height control
Developement Built of temples along canals, Foreign residences in BKK, Interest of EU on SE Asia, Financial from U.S.A, Industrailization, Greater
Military service for the Infrastructure, shophouses, King Rama V tour Europe, Public housing, Building Bangkok Plan, Urban plan
construction of general Open route to China, New political system, code, Commercial buildings code, 1st socio-economic
infrastructure Public facilities, Slave Import Dutch and Uk for immigrants development plan, FAR,
liberation planners Condominium, Zonning
Source : A. Kishiue et al.(2005)
21. 100% WHAT DID BANGKOK LOOK IN THE PAST? BKKs 02
URBANUSE /
LAND DEVELOPMENT Transportation
TRANSPORT Water transportation
Water-Based Transport
Phrasing
and Walking Period Transport Modernisation Period Modernisation Period
50% (Rama V-VIII) Train
(Rama IX)
Physicle info. (Rama I-IV)
Public trans.
Establishment of Original 1st Modernization wave City Expansion withTransporta- Road Network Development Suburb Development and
Tram
Private vehi. Bangkok( 782- 852)
1 1 ( 852- 885)
1 1 tion Structure( 886- 934)
1 1 ( 935- 959)
1 1 Land use Change( 960- 990)
1 1
King RAMA Road transportation
(I-IX)
Private vehicles
Year
( 700s- 900s)
1 1
A B C D E
Population
(200000 ppl)
Built-up area
( 000 ha)
1
Density
(25 ppl/ha)
Canal length
( 50 km)
1
100% Road length
(400 km)
Bus/
100 ppl
Trams/
100 ppl
50%
Rail route length Urban development
( 0 km)
1
Population
Rail route length
( km/10000 sq.km)
1 Urban area
Motorcycle/
10000 ppl Density
Car/10000 ppl A B C D E
Source : A. Kishiue et al.(2005)
22. Population
(200000 ppl)
Built-up area
WHAT DID BANGKOK LOOK IN THE PAST? BKKs 02
( 000 ha)
1
TRANSPORTATION Density
(25 ppl/ha)
Canal length
( 50 km)
1
Road length
(400 km)
Bus/
100 ppl
Trams/
100 ppl
Rail route length
( 0 km)
1
Rail route length
( km/10000 sq.km)
1
Motorcycle/
10000 ppl
Car/10000 ppl
100%
Transportation
Water transportation
50% Train
Tram
Road transportation
Private vehicles
A B C D E
Source : A. Kishiue et al.(2005)
23. request from Westerns 1889 - Ratchadamnoen rd.
Transpor
Intrastructur
1906 - Road network plan
1990 - First automobile WHAT DID BANGKOK LOOK IN THE PAST? BKKs 02
1903 - Emerge of 4S area
1934 - First bridge
THE INTERRELATION
1782 - Define theOriginal
Establishment of
Palace, 1880s - trading firm, embas- 1887 - Class A residential area
City Expansion withTransporta-
1936 Network area 4300 ha,
Road
- urban Development 1960s - Large shopping
Suburb Development and
1st Modernization wave
Uban Developmetn
walled city(7 1852)
.23 km length)
Bangkok( 782-
1 sies 1885)
( 852-
1
by private investors 934)
tion Structure( 886-
1 1 Control 959)
( 935- of Townscape in BKK
1 1 center constructed 1
Land use Change( 960- 990)
1
1785 - 346 ha for BKK, 1851 - Urban area 640 ha 1890s - Hub of cargo 1947 - Lost of role of com- 1971 - population double,
1782temples, emerged of
built - 3 Canala and Chao 1880s -- Population 400,000
1854 Private sector in 1886 - 1892 Railway to Dusit
1897 - Palace moved mercial district
- Infrastructure development suburb development
1976- Inner ring road
Intrastructure Development
Phraya river district
commercial as transport Infrastructure firms from
1855 - Foreign 1919 - Removal of wall
1888 - Sathon rd., canal - Road network built of trade
- 1950s - prohibition 1979 - BKK sprawl,
1981 - Expressway
means - BKK double size
1840s Bowring Treaty (527 ,000 ppl) - Canal for irrigation Thialand
between China and 1992 - 4S became hish rise
Transportation and
1853 - Rama IV road, canal 1897 - Surawong rd, canal
1853 - Wall destruction along
1852 - Pradung Krungkasem 1861 - Silom canal to China,
1882 - Open trade 1894 - 1934 Tramway, 1951 - Commercializationppl,
- 1957 - pop. 1831000 of bd.
canals
canal 370000 migrants
1862 - Charoen Krung rd., Streetlight Railway of 4S changed to
Landuse
request from Westerns 1889 - Ratchadamnoen rd. commercial aspect
1906 - Road network plan
Priority 1990 - First automobile
+3 1903 - Emerge of 4S area
1934 - First bridge
+2
+1
1782 - Define the Palace, 1880s - trading firm, embas- 1887 - Class A residential area 1936 - urban area 4300 ha, 1960s - Large shopping
Uban Developmetn
walled city(7 km length)
.23 sies by private investors Control of Townscape in BKK center constructed
1785 - 346 ha for BKK, II
I 1851 - Urban area 640 ha IV
III 1890s - Hub of cargo
V 1947 - Lost of role of com-
VI VII VIII 1971 - population double,
IX
built temples, emerged of 1854 - Population 400,000 1897 - Palace moved to Dusit mercial district suburb development
commercial district 1855 - Foreign firms from 1919 - Removal of wall - 1950s - prohibition of trade 1979 - BKK sprawl,
1840s - BKK double size
1782 Bowring Treaty 1852 (527,000 ppl)1885 between China1934Thialand
and 1959 - 4S became hish rise
1992 1992
1853 - Wall destruction along 1882 - Open trade to China, - 1957 - pop. 1831000 ppl, bd.
canals 370000 migrants Landuse of 4S changed to
commercial aspect
Priority
Priority
+3 +3
+2
+2
+1
+1
I I II II III III IVIV VV VIVI VII
VII VIII
VIII IX IX
1782
1782 1852
1852 1885
1885 1934
1934 1959
1959 1992
1992
Source : A. Kishiue et al.(2005)
25. WHAT IS THE CONSEQUENCES FROM THE PAST? BKKs 03
THE CONSEQUENCES
Urban development Infrastuctures
1782-1852 Main Highway
1853-1885 Motor way
1886-1934 Expressway
1935-1959 Ring road
1960-1990 Metro
BKK model
. . ( ( ( ) ( )
Source : Reproduced from a map produced by BMA planning standard(2009)
26. WHAT IS THE CONSEQUENCES FROM THE PAST? BKKs 03
PAST ASSEMBLED PRESENT
1782 Venice of the east: 1853 Foreign influences: an ending 1886 Modernizing Bangkok: Road net-
Life and transportation on Canals of monopoly of the government work, train and tram lines adopted
network and an emergence of foreigners from Europe
(Fernao Mendez Pinto 1554) (Tasaka T. 1998) (Pattanaek W. 2000)
1935 New towns in town: Rapid urban- 1960 Planning act: A plan for 2000 The two lines:
ization enclaves on infrastructure expressways and ring roads and Scatterded CBD and CSD were tied
node the period of high rise buildings up by the Sky train
(Kaothien U. 1997) (Amano K., Kishiue A. 2005) (McGrath B. 2009)
Source : Reproduced from a picture of R.Kanjanapanyakom(2008)
27. WHAT IS THE CONSEQUENCES FROM THE PAST? BKKs 03
THE CHALLENGE
Urban development interrelates to infrastructure development
1st - 2nd period Urban Development interrealates with infrastructure develpment
1782-1885 Public transportation Urban Development leads infrastructure
Community-based development develpment
Urban Development follows with infrastructure
1886-2010 Private transportation
Resource-based development develpment
Mass transit transportation Using built infrastructure development to strengthen
2011-???? Civic-based development
the historic core
28. WHAT IS THE CONSEQUENCES FROM THE PAST? BKKs 03
THE CHALLENGE
Urban development interrelates to infrastructure development
3rd- 5th period Urban Development interrealates with infrastructure develpment
1782-1885 Public transportation Urban Development leads infrastructure
Community-based development develpment
Urban Development follows with infrastructure
1886-2010 Private transportation
Resource-based development develpment
Mass transit transportation Using built infrastructure development to strengthen
2011-???? Civic-based development
the historic core
29. WHAT IS THE CONSEQUENCES FROM THE PAST? BKKs 03
THE CHALLENGE
Urban development interrelates to infrastructure development
6th period Urban Development interrealates with infrastructure develpment
1782-1885 Public transportation Urban Development leads infrastructure
Community-based development develpment
Urban Development follows with infrastructure
1886-2010 Private transportation
Resource-based development develpment
Mass transit transportation Using built infrastructure development to strengthen
2011-???? Civic-based development
the historic core
30. WHAT DOES THE PAST EFFECT THE PRESENT? BKKs 03
CONDITIONS OF MTS
Planned
Weakness
- Not integrated with
local(mass)
- Expensive
Formal economic
- Commuters
- Segregated transport
Strength
- More and more people
using it
- Increasing develop-
Globalization
ment and investments
- Upgrading landuse and
price
- Fast, clean, unpoluted Mass transit system
- Linking with public facili-
ties Airport link
Sky train
Underground
Source : www.flickr.com
31. WHAT DOES THE PAST EFFECT THE PRESENT? ?
BKKs 03
CONDITIONS OF HISTORIC CORES OF BKK
Unplanned
Weakness
- The consequence of
economic recession
caused people moving
Informal economic area
out of the
- Urban fragmentaion
- Lack of conectivity and
accessibility
- Market oriented
Strength
Localization
- High historic value and Urban development
cultural identity
1782-1852
- Tourists’ attraction
1853-1885
1886-1934
1935-1959
1960-1990
Source : www.flickr.com
32. WHAT IS THE CONSEQUENCES FROM THE PAST? BKKs 03
THE DUAL CITY [ ]
Plan - unplan
Formal - informal economic activities
Globalization - localization
Source : www.flickr.com
34. WHAT WOULD BANKOK BE IN 2030? BKKs 04
CONFRONTATION
Source : BMA mass transit master plan(2010)
35. WHAT WOULD BANKOK BE IN 2030? BKKs 04
CONFRONTATION
Source : BMA mass transit master plan(2010)
36. WHAT WOULD BANKOK BE IN 2030? BKKs 04
THE PROBABLE SCENARIO
Secession Confliction Displacement
Spatial fragmentation Lifestyles Unintended economic eviction
Demograhic Generic city
37. WHAT WOULD BANKOK BE IN 2030? BKKs 04
REPETITIOUS EXPERIENCES
Secesstion
Weakness
- Not integrated with
local(mass)
- Expensive
- Commuters
Sathon Road
Secession
- Segregated transport Confliction Displacement
Spatial fragmentation
Aristocratic family Developers Government
Lifestyles
Local people Market
Unintended economic eviction
Demograhic Generic city
Strength
- More and more people Secession
Spatial fragmentation
Confliction
Lifestyles
Demograhic
Displacement
Unintended economic eviction
Generic city
using it
- Increasing develop-
ment and investments
- Upgrading landuse and
price
- Fast, clean, unpoluted Mass transit system
- Linking with public facili-
ties Airport link
Sky train
Underground
Source : www.flickr.com
38. WHAT WOULD BANKOK BE IN 2030? BKKs 04
REPETITIOUS EXPERIENCES
Confliction
Weakness
- Not integrated with
local(mass)
- Expensive
- Commuters
Suanlum night bazaar
Confliction
- Segregated transport Displacement
Lifestyles Unintended economic eviction
Aristocratic family Developers Government Local people Market
Demograhic Generic city
Strength
- More and more people Secession Confliction Displacement
using it
Spatial fragmentation Lifestyles Unintended economic eviction
Demograhic Generic city
- Increasing develop-
ment and investments
- Upgrading landuse and
price
- Fast, clean, unpoluted Mass transit system
- Linking with public facili-
ties Airport link
Sky train
Underground
Source : www.flickr.com
39. WHAT WOULD BANKOK BE IN 2030? BKKs 04
REPETITIOUS EXPERIENCES
Replacement
Weakness
- Not integrated with
local(mass)
- Expensive
- Commuters
Nakornkasem
Displacement
- Segregated transport
Unintended economic eviction
Generic city Demograhic
Unintended economic eviction Lifestyles Spatial fragmentation
Displacement Confliction Secession
Aristocratic family Developers Government Local people Market
Generic city
Strength
- More and more people
using it
- Increasing develop-
ment and investments
- Upgrading landuse and
price
- Fast, clean, unpoluted Mass transit system
- Linking with public facili-
ties Airport link
Sky train
Underground
Source : www.flickr.com
42. WHAT WOULD BANKOK BE IN 2030? BKKs 04
THE DESIRABLE SCENARIO
Secession Confliction Displacement
Spatial fragmentation Lifestyles Unintended economic eviction
Demograhic Generic city
Preservation Enhancement Tranformation
Historic value Socio - economic sustainability Spatial fragmentation into
Cultural identity a coherent urban space
43. WHAT WOULD BANKOK BE IN 2030? BKKs 04
RESEARCH QUESTION
How to avoid the de-
struction of historic
areas when the mass
transit comes at the
same time enhancing
social cohesion and
economic viability?
44. WHAT WOULD BANKOK BE IN 2030? BKKs 04
ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS
How to avoid the destruction of historic areas when the mass transit comes
at the same time enhance social cohesion and economic viability?
SUB RESEARCH QUESTIONS
Preserve historic value, identity A
What is the historic value, cultural identity and
• Revitalization its potentials of the area?
• Maintain value, identity
• Develop potentials What are benefits and conflicts of the combination
B
of historic and new dynamics?
Enhance socio-economic sustainablity What are strategies for urban historic cores revitalization?
C
• Generate mutual benefits Are strategies related to TOD?
• Conflicts solved
• Positive gentrification What are the spatial indicators and key components
D
of urban vitality?
Transform Are there strategies to avoid indiscriminate gentrification
• Urban vitality E
and preserve lifestyles?
METHODOLOGY
Literature review| Historic research| Interview| Case study| Technical research
A
Context understanding
B
C
Tools for design
D
Implementation and evaluation E
45. WHAT WOULD BANKOK BE IN 2030? BKKs 04
ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS
How to avoid the destruction of historic areas when the mass transit comes
at the same time enhance social cohesion and economic viability?
SUB RESEARCH QUESTIONS
Preserve historic value, identity A
What is the historic value, cultural identity and
• Revitalization its potentials of the area?
• Maintain value, identity
• Develop potentials What are benefits and conflicts of the combination
B
of historic and new dynamics?
Enhance socio-economic sustainablity What are strategies for urban historic cores revitalization?
C
• Generate mutual benefits Are strategies related to TOD?
• Conflicts solved
• Positive gentrification What are the spatial indicators and key components
D
of urban vitality?
Transform Are there strategies to avoid indiscriminate gentrification
• Urban vitality E
and preserve lifestyles?
METHODOLOGY
Literature review| Historic research| Interview| Case study| Technical research
A
Context understanding
B
C
Tools for design
D
Implementation and evaluation E
46. WHAT WOULD BANKOK BE IN 2030? BKKs 04
ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS
How to avoid the destruction of historic areas when the mass transit comes
at the same time enhance social cohesion and economic viability?
SUB RESEARCH QUESTIONS
Preserve historic value, identity A
What is the historic value, cultural identity and
• Revitalization its potentials of the area?
• Maintain value, identity
• Develop potentials What are benefits and conflicts of the combination
B
of historic and new dynamics?
Enhance socio-economic sustainablity What are strategies for urban historic cores revitalization?
C
• Generate mutual benefits Are strategies related to TOD?
• Conflicts solved
• Positive gentrification What are the spatial indicators and key components
D
of urban vitality?
Transform Are there strategies to avoid indiscriminate gentrification
• Urban vitality E
and preserve lifestyles?
METHODOLOGY
Literature review| Historic research| Interview| Case study| Technical research
A
Context understanding
B
C
Tools for design
D
Implementation and evaluation E
47. WHAT WOULD BANKOK BE IN 2030? BKKs 04
RELEVANT THEORIES
Process
The dual city
Traditional Historic
Development Revitalization
Synergy
Urban Vitality
Social Polarization
Gentrification
MTS TOD
Development
48. WHAT WOULD BANKOK BE IN 2030? BKKs 04
RELEVANT THEORIES
Process
The dual city
Traditional Historic
Development Revitalization
Synergy
Urban Vitality
Social Polarization
Gentrification
MTS TOD
Development
49. WHAT WOULD BANKOK BE IN 2030? BKKs 04
RELEVANT THEORIES
Process
The dual city
Traditional Historic
Development Revitalization
Synergy
Urban Vitality
Social Polarization
Gentrification
MTS TOD
Development
50. WHAT WOULD BANKOK BE IN 2030? BKKs 04
PROJECT POSITIONING
Land use
management
Comprehensive Regional
integrated economic
Plan Build Use
Urbanism
Current
Desirable
Land use
management
Participate
Comprehensive Regional
integrated economic
Monitor Build
Urbanism
51. WHAT WOULD BANKOK BE IN 2030? BKKs 04
PROJECT POSITIONING
Land use
management
Comprehensive Regional
integrated economic
Plan Build Use
Urbanism
Current
Desirable
Land use
management
Participate
Comprehensive Regional
integrated economic
Monitor Build
Urbanism
52. WHAT WOULD BANKOK BE IN 2030? BKKs 04
POSSIBLE INTERVENTION
Management Spatial Components
Nonlinear New Typology Openspace
53. WHAT WOULD BANKOK BE IN 2030? BKKs 04
SYNERGY[ ] MEANS...
Intervention
Enhancement Tranformation
Socio - economic sustainability Spatial fragmentation into
a coherent urban space
Management Spatial Components
+ +
Nonlinear New Typology Openspace
Spatial quality economic Social Function
Presearved identity,value Viability Positive Gentrification Mixed use
Amenities improved
Goal
54. WHAT WOULD BANKOK BE IN 2030? BKKs 04
BANGKOK IN 2030
Tools for decision
Policy Governance
makers and planners
A model of socio economic restructuring Redefine the role Pilot project integrated with
Policy of denification the network of Bangkok MTS
Land use, zonning changed
Specific project plan
55. WHAT WOULD BANKOK BE IN 2030? BKKs 04
WHAT IS NEXT?
P1 P2 P3 P4 P5
Research
- Study on current conditions of Bangkok
and its potential
- Specified research in the field of design
- Technical research
Theoretical framework
- Relation of TOD and urban revitalization
- Spatial indicators of urban vitality
- Positive gentrification
- Conflicts between social and economic development
Design task
- Preliminary design proporsal
- Design proporsal
- Evaluation and reflection
- Possibility study
Literature study Implementation on vision Detailed design Specific project plan
Theory paper Strategy Design parameter Evaluation
Case study Design parameter Screnarios Conclusion
Interview
Analysis on existing layers
Statistic research
Vision
Design