SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 22
Baixar para ler offline
10 princípios para Hotel review sites
Permitem aos turistas, antes ainda de procederem às suas reservas, o acesso ao relato (escrito) da experiência de outros turistas clientes de determinado hotel As  site reviews Os Clientes •  podem descrever a sua experiência relativamente á estadia •  são assistidos na busca do hotel que melhor se ajuste aos seus requisitos de busca, de acordo com as  reviews  dos clientes anteriores.
Os sitios de  reviews  dum hotel permitem á unidade hoteleira: •  apresentar a sua oferta num ambiente amigável ao consumidor; •  endereçar melhor determinados nichos de mercado; •  aproveitar o  feedback  deixado nos sítios para melhor conhecer os pontos fracos da oferta; •  utilizar estas avaliações para fazer  benchmark  da satisfação dos clientes Os sitios de  reviews  podem, infelizmente, ser o local para práticas comerciais ilicitas As  site reviews
LAW OF FEW 10% INFLUENCE  PURCHASING BEHAVIOR OF OTHER  90% 91%  LIKELY TO BUY ON RECOMMENDATION
Inserir slide 18 de lonely 1225… Trust:e-trust Source: Forrester Research
Inserir slide 21de lonely 1225…
10 principles proposed by the hotel industry relating to “hotel review” sites 1. Editorial control Guest reviews should only be published after verification by qualified editorial staff of the authenticity and reliability of the entry. 2. Prevention of manipulation 2.1 Site providers should ensure that reviews of a hotel are provided only by guests who have actually stayed at the hotel. 2.2 Ratings should be based on an arithmetic average or statistical median, excluding under both systems the best and worst 10 % of evaluations from the calculation. 2.3 The number of ratings should be a factor in the calculation of ranking. 3. Quality assurance 3.1 Site providers should ensure that hotel contact coordinates, basic content data, availability or rates figures shown on their sites are displayed accurately. 3.2 Reviews should only refer to the hotel facilities that are actually offered by the hotel. For example, an evaluation of the “gastronomic” performance of a hotel offering breakfast only should not influence the rating of this hotel. 3.3 The hotel guest should be led to comment exclusively upon the services and offers he/she actually took advantage of during his/her stay at the hotel. For example a guest not using the spa facilities or the restaurant of a hotel should refrain from posting a review of these hotel facilities. 3.4 Review sites should provide the user with evaluation criteria, which are · relevant; · with appropriate levels of detail; and · commensurate with the characteristics of the hotel. 3.5 The user should be given the opportunity to express the evaluation not only via ratings but also via “open” texts. As reviews dum  hóspede   devem  ser publicadas depois de verificada por staff editorial qualificado a autenticidade da entrada. 10 princípios para Hotel review sites 1. Controlo editorial
10 principles proposed by the hotel industry relating to “hotel review” sites 1. Editorial control Guest reviews should only be published after verification by qualified editorial staff of the authenticity and reliability of the entry. 2. Prevention of manipulation 2.1 Site providers should ensure that reviews of a hotel are provided only by guests who have actually stayed at the hotel. 2.2 Ratings should be based on an arithmetic average or statistical median, excluding under both systems the best and worst 10 % of evaluations from the calculation. 2.3 The number of ratings should be a factor in the calculation of ranking. 3. Quality assurance 3.1 Site providers should ensure that hotel contact coordinates, basic content data, availability or rates figures shown on their sites are displayed accurately. 3.2 Reviews should only refer to the hotel facilities that are actually offered by the hotel. For example, an evaluation of the “gastronomic” performance of a hotel offering breakfast only should not influence the rating of this hotel. 3.3 The hotel guest should be led to comment exclusively upon the services and offers he/she actually took advantage of during his/her stay at the hotel. For example a guest not using the spa facilities or the restaurant of a hotel should refrain from posting a review of these hotel facilities. 3.4 Review sites should provide the user with evaluation criteria, which are · relevant; · with appropriate levels of detail; and · commensurate with the characteristics of the hotel. 3.5 The user should be given the opportunity to express the evaluation not only via ratings but also via “open” texts. 2.1  Os promotores dos sítios de  reviews  devem assegurar que estas apenas tem origem em clientes que tenham de facto permanecido no hotel. 2.2 Avaliações ( rating ) devem basear-se em médias aritméticas ou na mediana estatística, excluindo de ambos os meios os melhores e piores 10% de avaliações. 2.3 O numero de avaliações deve ser factor no cálculo do  ranking . 10 princípios para Hotel review sites 2. Prevenção da manipulação
10 principles proposed by the hotel industry relating to “hotel review” sites 1. Editorial control Guest reviews should only be published after verification by qualified editorial staff of the authenticity and reliability of the entry. 2. Prevention of manipulation 2.1 Site providers should ensure that reviews of a hotel are provided only by guests who have actually stayed at the hotel. 2.2 Ratings should be based on an arithmetic average or statistical median, excluding under both systems the best and worst 10 % of evaluations from the calculation. 2.3 The number of ratings should be a factor in the calculation of ranking. 3. Quality assurance 3.1 Site providers should ensure that hotel contact coordinates, basic content data, availability or rates figures shown on their sites are displayed accurately. 3.2 Reviews should only refer to the hotel facilities that are actually offered by the hotel. For example, an evaluation of the “gastronomic” performance of a hotel offering breakfast only should not influence the rating of this hotel. 3.3 The hotel guest should be led to comment exclusively upon the services and offers he/she actually took advantage of during his/her stay at the hotel. For example a guest not using the spa facilities or the restaurant of a hotel should refrain from posting a review of these hotel facilities. 3.4 Review sites should provide the user with evaluation criteria, which are · relevant; · with appropriate levels of detail; and · commensurate with the characteristics of the hotel. 3.5 The user should be given the opportunity to express the evaluation not only via ratings but also via “open” texts. 3.1  Os promotores dos sítios de  reviews  devem assegurar que os dados básicos do hotel, incluindo as suas coordenadas ou disponibilidades são apresentados com precisão. 3.2 As  reviews  devem apenas fazer referência a serviços  constantes de facto no  portfolio  da unidade. Por exemplo a avaliação da oferta gastronómica dum hotel que apenas ofereça BB nao deve influenciar o  rating  da unidade . 10 princípios para Hotel review sites 3. Garantia de qualidade
10 principles proposed by the hotel industry relating to “hotel review” sites 1. Editorial control Guest reviews should only be published after verification by qualified editorial staff of the authenticity and reliability of the entry. 2. Prevention of manipulation 2.1 Site providers should ensure that reviews of a hotel are provided only by guests who have actually stayed at the hotel. 2.2 Ratings should be based on an arithmetic average or statistical median, excluding under both systems the best and worst 10 % of evaluations from the calculation. 2.3 The number of ratings should be a factor in the calculation of ranking. 3. Quality assurance 3.1 Site providers should ensure that hotel contact coordinates, basic content data, availability or rates figures shown on their sites are displayed accurately. 3.2 Reviews should only refer to the hotel facilities that are actually offered by the hotel. For example, an evaluation of the “gastronomic” performance of a hotel offering breakfast only should not influence the rating of this hotel. 3.3 The hotel guest should be led to comment exclusively upon the services and offers he/she actually took advantage of during his/her stay at the hotel. For example a guest not using the spa facilities or the restaurant of a hotel should refrain from posting a review of these hotel facilities. 3.4 Review sites should provide the user with evaluation criteria, which are · relevant; · with appropriate levels of detail; and · commensurate with the characteristics of the hotel. 3.5 The user should be given the opportunity to express the evaluation not only via ratings but also via “open” texts. 3.3 O hóspede deve ser levado a comentar, exclusivamente, os serviços de que tenha usufruido durante a estadia no hotel. Por exemplo um hóspede que não tenha usado os serviços de  spa  ou de restauração deve abster-se de desenvolver review´s sobre essas ofertas. 3.4 Os sitios de  reviews  devem informar os navegantes sobre os critérios de avaliação, nomeadamente relevancia e niveis de detalhe adequados, compatíveis com as características do hotel.  10 princípios para Hotel review sites 3. Garantia de qualidade (cont.)
10 principles proposed by the hotel industry relating to “hotel review” sites 1. Editorial control Guest reviews should only be published after verification by qualified editorial staff of the authenticity and reliability of the entry. 2. Prevention of manipulation 2.1 Site providers should ensure that reviews of a hotel are provided only by guests who have actually stayed at the hotel. 2.2 Ratings should be based on an arithmetic average or statistical median, excluding under both systems the best and worst 10 % of evaluations from the calculation. 2.3 The number of ratings should be a factor in the calculation of ranking. 3. Quality assurance 3.1 Site providers should ensure that hotel contact coordinates, basic content data, availability or rates figures shown on their sites are displayed accurately. 3.2 Reviews should only refer to the hotel facilities that are actually offered by the hotel. For example, an evaluation of the “gastronomic” performance of a hotel offering breakfast only should not influence the rating of this hotel. 3.3 The hotel guest should be led to comment exclusively upon the services and offers he/she actually took advantage of during his/her stay at the hotel. For example a guest not using the spa facilities or the restaurant of a hotel should refrain from posting a review of these hotel facilities. 3.4 Review sites should provide the user with evaluation criteria, which are · relevant; · with appropriate levels of detail; and · commensurate with the characteristics of the hotel. 3.5 The user should be given the opportunity to express the evaluation not only via ratings but also via “open” texts. 3.5 Ao navegante dum sítio de  reviews  deve ser dada a oportunidade de avaliar, não apenas via  rating , mas também em texto aberto. 10 princípios para Hotel review sites 3. Garantia de qualidade (cont.)
10 principles proposed by the hotel industry relating to “hotel review” sites 1. Editorial control Guest reviews should only be published after verification by qualified editorial staff of the authenticity and reliability of the entry. 2. Prevention of manipulation 2.1 Site providers should ensure that reviews of a hotel are provided only by guests who have actually stayed at the hotel. 2.2 Ratings should be based on an arithmetic average or statistical median, excluding under both systems the best and worst 10 % of evaluations from the calculation. 2.3 The number of ratings should be a factor in the calculation of ranking. 3. Quality assurance 3.1 Site providers should ensure that hotel contact coordinates, basic content data, availability or rates figures shown on their sites are displayed accurately. 3.2 Reviews should only refer to the hotel facilities that are actually offered by the hotel. For example, an evaluation of the “gastronomic” performance of a hotel offering breakfast only should not influence the rating of this hotel. 3.3 The hotel guest should be led to comment exclusively upon the services and offers he/she actually took advantage of during his/her stay at the hotel. For example a guest not using the spa facilities or the restaurant of a hotel should refrain from posting a review of these hotel facilities. 3.4 Review sites should provide the user with evaluation criteria, which are · relevant; · with appropriate levels of detail; and · commensurate with the characteristics of the hotel. 3.5 The user should be given the opportunity to express the evaluation not only via ratings but also via “open” texts. Criticas não devem ser anónimas para o promotor do sítio de  reviews ,  por cujo intermédio  a unidade hoteleira deve poder reagir.  O promotor deve reconfirmar  o endereço de correio electrónico usado pelo hóspede, excluindo  emails  temporários. 10 princípios para Hotel review sites 4. Reviews não anónimas
10 principles proposed by the hotel industry relating to “hotel review” sites 1. Editorial control Guest reviews should only be published after verification by qualified editorial staff of the authenticity and reliability of the entry. 2. Prevention of manipulation 2.1 Site providers should ensure that reviews of a hotel are provided only by guests who have actually stayed at the hotel. 2.2 Ratings should be based on an arithmetic average or statistical median, excluding under both systems the best and worst 10 % of evaluations from the calculation. 2.3 The number of ratings should be a factor in the calculation of ranking. 3. Quality assurance 3.1 Site providers should ensure that hotel contact coordinates, basic content data, availability or rates figures shown on their sites are displayed accurately. 3.2 Reviews should only refer to the hotel facilities that are actually offered by the hotel. For example, an evaluation of the “gastronomic” performance of a hotel offering breakfast only should not influence the rating of this hotel. 3.3 The hotel guest should be led to comment exclusively upon the services and offers he/she actually took advantage of during his/her stay at the hotel. For example a guest not using the spa facilities or the restaurant of a hotel should refrain from posting a review of these hotel facilities. 3.4 Review sites should provide the user with evaluation criteria, which are · relevant; · with appropriate levels of detail; and · commensurate with the characteristics of the hotel. 3.5 The user should be given the opportunity to express the evaluation not only via ratings but also via “open” texts. 5.1 Um sítio de  reviews  apenas deverá visualizar reviews quando o número de críticas/comentários para uma determinada unidade for significativa relativamente ao seu numero de quartos. 5.2 Neste contexto o promotor do sítio deve prestar particular atenção á supervisão de  reviews  individuais até que o numero mínimo crítico seja alcançado. 10 princípios para Hotel review sites 5. Numero mínimo garantido de reviews
10 principles proposed by the hotel industry relating to “hotel review” sites 1. Editorial control Guest reviews should only be published after verification by qualified editorial staff of the authenticity and reliability of the entry. 2. Prevention of manipulation 2.1 Site providers should ensure that reviews of a hotel are provided only by guests who have actually stayed at the hotel. 2.2 Ratings should be based on an arithmetic average or statistical median, excluding under both systems the best and worst 10 % of evaluations from the calculation. 2.3 The number of ratings should be a factor in the calculation of ranking. 3. Quality assurance 3.1 Site providers should ensure that hotel contact coordinates, basic content data, availability or rates figures shown on their sites are displayed accurately. 3.2 Reviews should only refer to the hotel facilities that are actually offered by the hotel. For example, an evaluation of the “gastronomic” performance of a hotel offering breakfast only should not influence the rating of this hotel. 3.3 The hotel guest should be led to comment exclusively upon the services and offers he/she actually took advantage of during his/her stay at the hotel. For example a guest not using the spa facilities or the restaurant of a hotel should refrain from posting a review of these hotel facilities. 3.4 Review sites should provide the user with evaluation criteria, which are · relevant; · with appropriate levels of detail; and · commensurate with the characteristics of the hotel. 3.5 The user should be given the opportunity to express the evaluation not only via ratings but also via “open” texts. 6.1 De forma a melhorar a sua fiabilidade e comparabilidade, os sítios de  reviews  de serviços hoteleiros devem esforçar-se por harmonizar as suas escalas de  rating , ascendentes de 1 (pior) a 10 (melhor), bem como dar orientações sobre o significado da classificação. Em nenhuma circustância devem ser usadas estrelas, para que nenhuma confusão com a classificação hoteleira possa ser feita.   10 princípios para Hotel review sites 6. Harmonização de escalas de rating
10 principles proposed by the hotel industry relating to “hotel review” sites 1. Editorial control Guest reviews should only be published after verification by qualified editorial staff of the authenticity and reliability of the entry. 2. Prevention of manipulation 2.1 Site providers should ensure that reviews of a hotel are provided only by guests who have actually stayed at the hotel. 2.2 Ratings should be based on an arithmetic average or statistical median, excluding under both systems the best and worst 10 % of evaluations from the calculation. 2.3 The number of ratings should be a factor in the calculation of ranking. 3. Quality assurance 3.1 Site providers should ensure that hotel contact coordinates, basic content data, availability or rates figures shown on their sites are displayed accurately. 3.2 Reviews should only refer to the hotel facilities that are actually offered by the hotel. For example, an evaluation of the “gastronomic” performance of a hotel offering breakfast only should not influence the rating of this hotel. 3.3 The hotel guest should be led to comment exclusively upon the services and offers he/she actually took advantage of during his/her stay at the hotel. For example a guest not using the spa facilities or the restaurant of a hotel should refrain from posting a review of these hotel facilities. 3.4 Review sites should provide the user with evaluation criteria, which are · relevant; · with appropriate levels of detail; and · commensurate with the characteristics of the hotel. 3.5 The user should be given the opportunity to express the evaluation not only via ratings but also via “open” texts. Em qualquer caso ( review  positiva ou negativa), o sitio de  reviews  deve automaticamente oferecer ao hotel a possibilidade de reagir (usando por exemplo um sistema de alertas por  email ). Desta forma possibilita-se á unidade o acesso e a gestão das queixas do cliente de forma activa e  on-time Quando disponível, deverá tambem ser  facilitado acesso aos serviços de coordenação/supervisão da actividade hoteleira ou seus mediadores. 10 princípios para Hotel review sites 7. Direito de resposta
10 principles proposed by the hotel industry relating to “hotel review” sites 1. Editorial control Guest reviews should only be published after verification by qualified editorial staff of the authenticity and reliability of the entry. 2. Prevention of manipulation 2.1 Site providers should ensure that reviews of a hotel are provided only by guests who have actually stayed at the hotel. 2.2 Ratings should be based on an arithmetic average or statistical median, excluding under both systems the best and worst 10 % of evaluations from the calculation. 2.3 The number of ratings should be a factor in the calculation of ranking. 3. Quality assurance 3.1 Site providers should ensure that hotel contact coordinates, basic content data, availability or rates figures shown on their sites are displayed accurately. 3.2 Reviews should only refer to the hotel facilities that are actually offered by the hotel. For example, an evaluation of the “gastronomic” performance of a hotel offering breakfast only should not influence the rating of this hotel. 3.3 The hotel guest should be led to comment exclusively upon the services and offers he/she actually took advantage of during his/her stay at the hotel. For example a guest not using the spa facilities or the restaurant of a hotel should refrain from posting a review of these hotel facilities. 3.4 Review sites should provide the user with evaluation criteria, which are · relevant; · with appropriate levels of detail; and · commensurate with the characteristics of the hotel. 3.5 The user should be given the opportunity to express the evaluation not only via ratings but also via “open” texts. Comentários deixados pelos hospedes devem ser verdadeiros e com base nas experiências pessoais dos seus autores. Os hoteleiros têm o direito legal de protecção contra as críticas difamatórias. Declarações falsas devem ser retirados dos  sites  de forma rápida e não burocrática 10 princípios para Hotel review sites 8. Segurança jurídica
10 principles proposed by the hotel industry relating to “hotel review” sites 1. Editorial control Guest reviews should only be published after verification by qualified editorial staff of the authenticity and reliability of the entry. 2. Prevention of manipulation 2.1 Site providers should ensure that reviews of a hotel are provided only by guests who have actually stayed at the hotel. 2.2 Ratings should be based on an arithmetic average or statistical median, excluding under both systems the best and worst 10 % of evaluations from the calculation. 2.3 The number of ratings should be a factor in the calculation of ranking. 3. Quality assurance 3.1 Site providers should ensure that hotel contact coordinates, basic content data, availability or rates figures shown on their sites are displayed accurately. 3.2 Reviews should only refer to the hotel facilities that are actually offered by the hotel. For example, an evaluation of the “gastronomic” performance of a hotel offering breakfast only should not influence the rating of this hotel. 3.3 The hotel guest should be led to comment exclusively upon the services and offers he/she actually took advantage of during his/her stay at the hotel. For example a guest not using the spa facilities or the restaurant of a hotel should refrain from posting a review of these hotel facilities. 3.4 Review sites should provide the user with evaluation criteria, which are · relevant; · with appropriate levels of detail; and · commensurate with the characteristics of the hotel. 3.5 The user should be given the opportunity to express the evaluation not only via ratings but also via “open” texts. Os sitios de reviews devem apenas mostrar reviews actuais. No máximo dois anos depois de ter sido lançada, uma  review  não deve mais influenciar o rating a que está afecta. Deve também ser eliminada nesse momento. 10 princípios para Hotel review sites 9. Dados actualizados
10 principles proposed by the hotel industry relating to “hotel review” sites 1. Editorial control Guest reviews should only be published after verification by qualified editorial staff of the authenticity and reliability of the entry. 2. Prevention of manipulation 2.1 Site providers should ensure that reviews of a hotel are provided only by guests who have actually stayed at the hotel. 2.2 Ratings should be based on an arithmetic average or statistical median, excluding under both systems the best and worst 10 % of evaluations from the calculation. 2.3 The number of ratings should be a factor in the calculation of ranking. 3. Quality assurance 3.1 Site providers should ensure that hotel contact coordinates, basic content data, availability or rates figures shown on their sites are displayed accurately. 3.2 Reviews should only refer to the hotel facilities that are actually offered by the hotel. For example, an evaluation of the “gastronomic” performance of a hotel offering breakfast only should not influence the rating of this hotel. 3.3 The hotel guest should be led to comment exclusively upon the services and offers he/she actually took advantage of during his/her stay at the hotel. For example a guest not using the spa facilities or the restaurant of a hotel should refrain from posting a review of these hotel facilities. 3.4 Review sites should provide the user with evaluation criteria, which are · relevant; · with appropriate levels of detail; and · commensurate with the characteristics of the hotel. 3.5 The user should be given the opportunity to express the evaluation not only via ratings but also via “open” texts. Como forma de aumentar a transparência para com os clientes, os sítios de  reviews  devem indicar quando usam sistema próprio de classificação e fornecer informação sobre o sistema oficial de classificação hoteleira em vigor no país do hotel, incluindo  link  para o sistema de classificação aplicável. Os sítios de  review  devem verificar, pelo menos uma vez por ano, junto das autoridades competentes,a classificação (oficial) dos hóteis que promovem. Devem tambem incluir referências aos sistemas de qualidade  em vigor nas unidades. 10 princípios para Hotel review sites 10. Indicação da classificação oficial (  )
 
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],10 princípios para Hotel review sites
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],10 princípios para Hotel review sites
Connecting People @ www.tourismthinktank.pt

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Semelhante a Seminario ahp hotel distribution ahp-hotrec

Review pro vs trustyou
Review pro vs trustyouReview pro vs trustyou
Review pro vs trustyouAgathe Lirzin
 
Tnooz-TripAdvisor webinar - Reputation management and beyond
Tnooz-TripAdvisor webinar - Reputation management and beyondTnooz-TripAdvisor webinar - Reputation management and beyond
Tnooz-TripAdvisor webinar - Reputation management and beyondKevin May
 
ReviewPro Webinar - Managing Guest Satisfaction in the Age of Social Media
ReviewPro Webinar - Managing Guest Satisfaction in the Age of Social MediaReviewPro Webinar - Managing Guest Satisfaction in the Age of Social Media
ReviewPro Webinar - Managing Guest Satisfaction in the Age of Social Mediambeneteau
 
ReviewPro Webinar - Managing Guest Satisfaction in the Age of Social Media
ReviewPro Webinar - Managing Guest Satisfaction in the Age of Social MediaReviewPro Webinar - Managing Guest Satisfaction in the Age of Social Media
ReviewPro Webinar - Managing Guest Satisfaction in the Age of Social Mediambeneteau
 
(english) Nueva Guía Tripadvisor Hoteles Aumentar opiniones online, tráfico a...
(english) Nueva Guía Tripadvisor Hoteles Aumentar opiniones online, tráfico a...(english) Nueva Guía Tripadvisor Hoteles Aumentar opiniones online, tráfico a...
(english) Nueva Guía Tripadvisor Hoteles Aumentar opiniones online, tráfico a...Habemus Digital Consultants
 
Hotel Review Pro
Hotel Review ProHotel Review Pro
Hotel Review ProCliff Kc
 
Using Online Ratings to define Hotels’ Improvement Priorities (I. Zisos)
Using Online Ratings to define Hotels’ Improvement Priorities (I. Zisos)Using Online Ratings to define Hotels’ Improvement Priorities (I. Zisos)
Using Online Ratings to define Hotels’ Improvement Priorities (I. Zisos)Giannhs Z.
 
The Impact of Guest Reviews on TripAdvisor Hotels
The Impact of Guest Reviews on TripAdvisor HotelsThe Impact of Guest Reviews on TripAdvisor Hotels
The Impact of Guest Reviews on TripAdvisor HotelsAbdul Razak
 
Contemporary Issues With Hotel Management
Contemporary Issues With Hotel ManagementContemporary Issues With Hotel Management
Contemporary Issues With Hotel ManagementPaper Writing Help Wise
 
Expedia marketplace White Paper April 2016
Expedia marketplace White Paper April 2016Expedia marketplace White Paper April 2016
Expedia marketplace White Paper April 2016Turistenístico
 
Alternaty - Hotel Operation Review
Alternaty - Hotel Operation ReviewAlternaty - Hotel Operation Review
Alternaty - Hotel Operation ReviewAlternaty
 
Guest satisfaction in the age of social
Guest satisfaction in the age of socialGuest satisfaction in the age of social
Guest satisfaction in the age of socialMathilde Briot
 

Semelhante a Seminario ahp hotel distribution ahp-hotrec (17)

Reputation Scorecards
Reputation ScorecardsReputation Scorecards
Reputation Scorecards
 
Review pro vs trustyou
Review pro vs trustyouReview pro vs trustyou
Review pro vs trustyou
 
Tnooz-TripAdvisor webinar - Reputation management and beyond
Tnooz-TripAdvisor webinar - Reputation management and beyondTnooz-TripAdvisor webinar - Reputation management and beyond
Tnooz-TripAdvisor webinar - Reputation management and beyond
 
ReviewPro Webinar - Managing Guest Satisfaction in the Age of Social Media
ReviewPro Webinar - Managing Guest Satisfaction in the Age of Social MediaReviewPro Webinar - Managing Guest Satisfaction in the Age of Social Media
ReviewPro Webinar - Managing Guest Satisfaction in the Age of Social Media
 
ReviewPro Webinar - Managing Guest Satisfaction in the Age of Social Media
ReviewPro Webinar - Managing Guest Satisfaction in the Age of Social MediaReviewPro Webinar - Managing Guest Satisfaction in the Age of Social Media
ReviewPro Webinar - Managing Guest Satisfaction in the Age of Social Media
 
(english) Nueva Guía Tripadvisor Hoteles Aumentar opiniones online, tráfico a...
(english) Nueva Guía Tripadvisor Hoteles Aumentar opiniones online, tráfico a...(english) Nueva Guía Tripadvisor Hoteles Aumentar opiniones online, tráfico a...
(english) Nueva Guía Tripadvisor Hoteles Aumentar opiniones online, tráfico a...
 
SALT Scores
SALT ScoresSALT Scores
SALT Scores
 
Hotel Review Pro
Hotel Review ProHotel Review Pro
Hotel Review Pro
 
Using Online Ratings to define Hotels’ Improvement Priorities (I. Zisos)
Using Online Ratings to define Hotels’ Improvement Priorities (I. Zisos)Using Online Ratings to define Hotels’ Improvement Priorities (I. Zisos)
Using Online Ratings to define Hotels’ Improvement Priorities (I. Zisos)
 
CRM- Need of Industry
CRM- Need of IndustryCRM- Need of Industry
CRM- Need of Industry
 
The Impact of Guest Reviews on TripAdvisor Hotels
The Impact of Guest Reviews on TripAdvisor HotelsThe Impact of Guest Reviews on TripAdvisor Hotels
The Impact of Guest Reviews on TripAdvisor Hotels
 
Contemporary Issues With Hotel Management
Contemporary Issues With Hotel ManagementContemporary Issues With Hotel Management
Contemporary Issues With Hotel Management
 
Hotel Management
Hotel ManagementHotel Management
Hotel Management
 
Expedia marketplace White Paper April 2016
Expedia marketplace White Paper April 2016Expedia marketplace White Paper April 2016
Expedia marketplace White Paper April 2016
 
Alternaty - Hotel Operation Review
Alternaty - Hotel Operation ReviewAlternaty - Hotel Operation Review
Alternaty - Hotel Operation Review
 
oberoi hotel
oberoi hoteloberoi hotel
oberoi hotel
 
Guest satisfaction in the age of social
Guest satisfaction in the age of socialGuest satisfaction in the age of social
Guest satisfaction in the age of social
 

Mais de Associação da Hotelaria de Portugal

TTT Best Pactices Forum Hotel Distribution 30 Nov 2010 FARO Viatecla
TTT Best Pactices Forum Hotel Distribution 30 Nov 2010 FARO ViateclaTTT Best Pactices Forum Hotel Distribution 30 Nov 2010 FARO Viatecla
TTT Best Pactices Forum Hotel Distribution 30 Nov 2010 FARO ViateclaAssociação da Hotelaria de Portugal
 
TTT Best Pactices Forum Hotel Distribution 30 Nov 2010 FARO - Memmo baleeira
TTT Best Pactices Forum Hotel Distribution 30 Nov 2010 FARO - Memmo baleeiraTTT Best Pactices Forum Hotel Distribution 30 Nov 2010 FARO - Memmo baleeira
TTT Best Pactices Forum Hotel Distribution 30 Nov 2010 FARO - Memmo baleeiraAssociação da Hotelaria de Portugal
 
TTT Best Pactices Forum Hotel Distribution 30 Nov 2010 FARO - Amadeus
TTT Best Pactices Forum Hotel Distribution 30 Nov 2010 FARO - AmadeusTTT Best Pactices Forum Hotel Distribution 30 Nov 2010 FARO - Amadeus
TTT Best Pactices Forum Hotel Distribution 30 Nov 2010 FARO - AmadeusAssociação da Hotelaria de Portugal
 

Mais de Associação da Hotelaria de Portugal (15)

Ttt best practices forum hotel distribution 27 novembro via tecla
Ttt best practices forum hotel distribution 27 novembro   via teclaTtt best practices forum hotel distribution 27 novembro   via tecla
Ttt best practices forum hotel distribution 27 novembro via tecla
 
Ttt best practices forum hotel distribution 27 novembro ahp-hotrec
Ttt best practices forum hotel distribution 27 novembro   ahp-hotrecTtt best practices forum hotel distribution 27 novembro   ahp-hotrec
Ttt best practices forum hotel distribution 27 novembro ahp-hotrec
 
Ttt best practices forum hotel distribution 27 novembro zoover
Ttt best practices forum hotel distribution 27 novembro   zooverTtt best practices forum hotel distribution 27 novembro   zoover
Ttt best practices forum hotel distribution 27 novembro zoover
 
TTT Best Pactices Forum Hotel Distribution 30 Nov 2010 FARO Viatecla
TTT Best Pactices Forum Hotel Distribution 30 Nov 2010 FARO ViateclaTTT Best Pactices Forum Hotel Distribution 30 Nov 2010 FARO Viatecla
TTT Best Pactices Forum Hotel Distribution 30 Nov 2010 FARO Viatecla
 
TTT Best Pactices Forum Hotel Distribution 30 Nov 2010 FARO - Memmo baleeira
TTT Best Pactices Forum Hotel Distribution 30 Nov 2010 FARO - Memmo baleeiraTTT Best Pactices Forum Hotel Distribution 30 Nov 2010 FARO - Memmo baleeira
TTT Best Pactices Forum Hotel Distribution 30 Nov 2010 FARO - Memmo baleeira
 
TTT Best Pactices Forum Hotel Distribution 30 Nov 2010 FARO - Amadeus
TTT Best Pactices Forum Hotel Distribution 30 Nov 2010 FARO - AmadeusTTT Best Pactices Forum Hotel Distribution 30 Nov 2010 FARO - Amadeus
TTT Best Pactices Forum Hotel Distribution 30 Nov 2010 FARO - Amadeus
 
Pilar sanchezaita ratetiger[faro]
Pilar sanchezaita ratetiger[faro]Pilar sanchezaita ratetiger[faro]
Pilar sanchezaita ratetiger[faro]
 
Cw umpc guia investimento imobiliário_set2010
Cw umpc guia investimento imobiliário_set2010Cw umpc guia investimento imobiliário_set2010
Cw umpc guia investimento imobiliário_set2010
 
Ciclo de seminários th2 2010
Ciclo de seminários th2 2010Ciclo de seminários th2 2010
Ciclo de seminários th2 2010
 
As viagens dos portugueses2010
As viagens dos portugueses2010As viagens dos portugueses2010
As viagens dos portugueses2010
 
Novos projectos turisticos do norte qren polo turismo 2015
Novos projectos turisticos do norte qren polo turismo 2015Novos projectos turisticos do norte qren polo turismo 2015
Novos projectos turisticos do norte qren polo turismo 2015
 
Novos projectos turísticos do norte QREN Polo Turismo 2015
Novos projectos turísticos do norte QREN Polo Turismo 2015Novos projectos turísticos do norte QREN Polo Turismo 2015
Novos projectos turísticos do norte QREN Polo Turismo 2015
 
Seminario AHP Hotel Distribution - Zoover
Seminario AHP Hotel Distribution - ZooverSeminario AHP Hotel Distribution - Zoover
Seminario AHP Hotel Distribution - Zoover
 
Seminario AHP Hotel Distribution - Rate Tiger
Seminario AHP Hotel Distribution - Rate TigerSeminario AHP Hotel Distribution - Rate Tiger
Seminario AHP Hotel Distribution - Rate Tiger
 
Seminario AHP Hotel Distribution - Viatecla
Seminario AHP Hotel Distribution  - ViateclaSeminario AHP Hotel Distribution  - Viatecla
Seminario AHP Hotel Distribution - Viatecla
 

Último

How To Prepare For An Unforgettable Blackwater Dive In Kona
How To Prepare For An Unforgettable Blackwater Dive In KonaHow To Prepare For An Unforgettable Blackwater Dive In Kona
How To Prepare For An Unforgettable Blackwater Dive In KonaKona Ocean Adventures
 
My presentation on vietnam for Intercultural Communications
My presentation on vietnam for Intercultural CommunicationsMy presentation on vietnam for Intercultural Communications
My presentation on vietnam for Intercultural Communicationsseijibrown2
 
Reflective Essay.pdf for Global Compentency
Reflective Essay.pdf for Global CompentencyReflective Essay.pdf for Global Compentency
Reflective Essay.pdf for Global Compentencyseijibrown2
 
Reflective Essay for global competency certificate
Reflective Essay for global competency certificateReflective Essay for global competency certificate
Reflective Essay for global competency certificateseijibrown2
 
pics from luxembourg exchange program 2016
pics from luxembourg exchange program 2016pics from luxembourg exchange program 2016
pics from luxembourg exchange program 2016seijibrown2
 
What Are The Best Locations In Aruba For A Thrilling Kayak Adventure
What Are The Best Locations In Aruba For A Thrilling Kayak AdventureWhat Are The Best Locations In Aruba For A Thrilling Kayak Adventure
What Are The Best Locations In Aruba For A Thrilling Kayak AdventureDelphi Watersports
 
TOURIST & ITS TYPE &MOTIVETIONAL FACTORS & BEHAVIOR .pptx
TOURIST & ITS TYPE &MOTIVETIONAL  FACTORS & BEHAVIOR .pptxTOURIST & ITS TYPE &MOTIVETIONAL  FACTORS & BEHAVIOR .pptx
TOURIST & ITS TYPE &MOTIVETIONAL FACTORS & BEHAVIOR .pptxkittustudy7
 
Vietnam presentation for intercultural communications class
Vietnam presentation for intercultural communications classVietnam presentation for intercultural communications class
Vietnam presentation for intercultural communications classseijibrown2
 
Exploring Uncharted Waters Your Guide To Private Sunset Cruise On Maui
Exploring Uncharted Waters Your Guide To Private Sunset Cruise On MauiExploring Uncharted Waters Your Guide To Private Sunset Cruise On Maui
Exploring Uncharted Waters Your Guide To Private Sunset Cruise On MauiMakena Coast Charters
 
Traveling by Train in Sicily: A New Era of Comfort and Convenience
Traveling by Train in Sicily: A New Era of Comfort and ConvenienceTraveling by Train in Sicily: A New Era of Comfort and Convenience
Traveling by Train in Sicily: A New Era of Comfort and ConvenienceTime for Sicily
 
Culture and Identity through English as a Lingua Franca (1).pdf
Culture and Identity through English as a Lingua Franca (1).pdfCulture and Identity through English as a Lingua Franca (1).pdf
Culture and Identity through English as a Lingua Franca (1).pdfseijibrown2
 
2024 Annual Meeting: Visit Portland, Maine
2024 Annual Meeting: Visit Portland, Maine2024 Annual Meeting: Visit Portland, Maine
2024 Annual Meeting: Visit Portland, MaineVisit Portland
 
Da Nang Tourist Attractions, VN (越南 峴港旅遊景點).ppsx
Da Nang Tourist Attractions, VN (越南 峴港旅遊景點).ppsxDa Nang Tourist Attractions, VN (越南 峴港旅遊景點).ppsx
Da Nang Tourist Attractions, VN (越南 峴港旅遊景點).ppsxChung Yen Chang
 
Nanbokucho-period, Historical Origins of Modern Japan
Nanbokucho-period, Historical Origins of Modern JapanNanbokucho-period, Historical Origins of Modern Japan
Nanbokucho-period, Historical Origins of Modern Japanseijibrown2
 
A Presentation of Braga. It was made by students of school
A Presentation of Braga. It was made by students of schoolA Presentation of Braga. It was made by students of school
A Presentation of Braga. It was made by students of schoolApostolos Syropoulos
 
The West Coast Trail Presentation for SAIT international students
The West Coast Trail Presentation for SAIT international studentsThe West Coast Trail Presentation for SAIT international students
The West Coast Trail Presentation for SAIT international studentsseijibrown2
 
Culture and Identity through English as a Lingua Franca.pdf
Culture and Identity through English as a Lingua Franca.pdfCulture and Identity through English as a Lingua Franca.pdf
Culture and Identity through English as a Lingua Franca.pdfseijibrown2
 

Último (17)

How To Prepare For An Unforgettable Blackwater Dive In Kona
How To Prepare For An Unforgettable Blackwater Dive In KonaHow To Prepare For An Unforgettable Blackwater Dive In Kona
How To Prepare For An Unforgettable Blackwater Dive In Kona
 
My presentation on vietnam for Intercultural Communications
My presentation on vietnam for Intercultural CommunicationsMy presentation on vietnam for Intercultural Communications
My presentation on vietnam for Intercultural Communications
 
Reflective Essay.pdf for Global Compentency
Reflective Essay.pdf for Global CompentencyReflective Essay.pdf for Global Compentency
Reflective Essay.pdf for Global Compentency
 
Reflective Essay for global competency certificate
Reflective Essay for global competency certificateReflective Essay for global competency certificate
Reflective Essay for global competency certificate
 
pics from luxembourg exchange program 2016
pics from luxembourg exchange program 2016pics from luxembourg exchange program 2016
pics from luxembourg exchange program 2016
 
What Are The Best Locations In Aruba For A Thrilling Kayak Adventure
What Are The Best Locations In Aruba For A Thrilling Kayak AdventureWhat Are The Best Locations In Aruba For A Thrilling Kayak Adventure
What Are The Best Locations In Aruba For A Thrilling Kayak Adventure
 
TOURIST & ITS TYPE &MOTIVETIONAL FACTORS & BEHAVIOR .pptx
TOURIST & ITS TYPE &MOTIVETIONAL  FACTORS & BEHAVIOR .pptxTOURIST & ITS TYPE &MOTIVETIONAL  FACTORS & BEHAVIOR .pptx
TOURIST & ITS TYPE &MOTIVETIONAL FACTORS & BEHAVIOR .pptx
 
Vietnam presentation for intercultural communications class
Vietnam presentation for intercultural communications classVietnam presentation for intercultural communications class
Vietnam presentation for intercultural communications class
 
Exploring Uncharted Waters Your Guide To Private Sunset Cruise On Maui
Exploring Uncharted Waters Your Guide To Private Sunset Cruise On MauiExploring Uncharted Waters Your Guide To Private Sunset Cruise On Maui
Exploring Uncharted Waters Your Guide To Private Sunset Cruise On Maui
 
Traveling by Train in Sicily: A New Era of Comfort and Convenience
Traveling by Train in Sicily: A New Era of Comfort and ConvenienceTraveling by Train in Sicily: A New Era of Comfort and Convenience
Traveling by Train in Sicily: A New Era of Comfort and Convenience
 
Culture and Identity through English as a Lingua Franca (1).pdf
Culture and Identity through English as a Lingua Franca (1).pdfCulture and Identity through English as a Lingua Franca (1).pdf
Culture and Identity through English as a Lingua Franca (1).pdf
 
2024 Annual Meeting: Visit Portland, Maine
2024 Annual Meeting: Visit Portland, Maine2024 Annual Meeting: Visit Portland, Maine
2024 Annual Meeting: Visit Portland, Maine
 
Da Nang Tourist Attractions, VN (越南 峴港旅遊景點).ppsx
Da Nang Tourist Attractions, VN (越南 峴港旅遊景點).ppsxDa Nang Tourist Attractions, VN (越南 峴港旅遊景點).ppsx
Da Nang Tourist Attractions, VN (越南 峴港旅遊景點).ppsx
 
Nanbokucho-period, Historical Origins of Modern Japan
Nanbokucho-period, Historical Origins of Modern JapanNanbokucho-period, Historical Origins of Modern Japan
Nanbokucho-period, Historical Origins of Modern Japan
 
A Presentation of Braga. It was made by students of school
A Presentation of Braga. It was made by students of schoolA Presentation of Braga. It was made by students of school
A Presentation of Braga. It was made by students of school
 
The West Coast Trail Presentation for SAIT international students
The West Coast Trail Presentation for SAIT international studentsThe West Coast Trail Presentation for SAIT international students
The West Coast Trail Presentation for SAIT international students
 
Culture and Identity through English as a Lingua Franca.pdf
Culture and Identity through English as a Lingua Franca.pdfCulture and Identity through English as a Lingua Franca.pdf
Culture and Identity through English as a Lingua Franca.pdf
 

Seminario ahp hotel distribution ahp-hotrec

  • 1. 10 princípios para Hotel review sites
  • 2. Permitem aos turistas, antes ainda de procederem às suas reservas, o acesso ao relato (escrito) da experiência de outros turistas clientes de determinado hotel As site reviews Os Clientes • podem descrever a sua experiência relativamente á estadia • são assistidos na busca do hotel que melhor se ajuste aos seus requisitos de busca, de acordo com as reviews dos clientes anteriores.
  • 3. Os sitios de reviews dum hotel permitem á unidade hoteleira: • apresentar a sua oferta num ambiente amigável ao consumidor; • endereçar melhor determinados nichos de mercado; • aproveitar o feedback deixado nos sítios para melhor conhecer os pontos fracos da oferta; • utilizar estas avaliações para fazer benchmark da satisfação dos clientes Os sitios de reviews podem, infelizmente, ser o local para práticas comerciais ilicitas As site reviews
  • 4. LAW OF FEW 10% INFLUENCE PURCHASING BEHAVIOR OF OTHER 90% 91% LIKELY TO BUY ON RECOMMENDATION
  • 5. Inserir slide 18 de lonely 1225… Trust:e-trust Source: Forrester Research
  • 6. Inserir slide 21de lonely 1225…
  • 7. 10 principles proposed by the hotel industry relating to “hotel review” sites 1. Editorial control Guest reviews should only be published after verification by qualified editorial staff of the authenticity and reliability of the entry. 2. Prevention of manipulation 2.1 Site providers should ensure that reviews of a hotel are provided only by guests who have actually stayed at the hotel. 2.2 Ratings should be based on an arithmetic average or statistical median, excluding under both systems the best and worst 10 % of evaluations from the calculation. 2.3 The number of ratings should be a factor in the calculation of ranking. 3. Quality assurance 3.1 Site providers should ensure that hotel contact coordinates, basic content data, availability or rates figures shown on their sites are displayed accurately. 3.2 Reviews should only refer to the hotel facilities that are actually offered by the hotel. For example, an evaluation of the “gastronomic” performance of a hotel offering breakfast only should not influence the rating of this hotel. 3.3 The hotel guest should be led to comment exclusively upon the services and offers he/she actually took advantage of during his/her stay at the hotel. For example a guest not using the spa facilities or the restaurant of a hotel should refrain from posting a review of these hotel facilities. 3.4 Review sites should provide the user with evaluation criteria, which are · relevant; · with appropriate levels of detail; and · commensurate with the characteristics of the hotel. 3.5 The user should be given the opportunity to express the evaluation not only via ratings but also via “open” texts. As reviews dum hóspede devem ser publicadas depois de verificada por staff editorial qualificado a autenticidade da entrada. 10 princípios para Hotel review sites 1. Controlo editorial
  • 8. 10 principles proposed by the hotel industry relating to “hotel review” sites 1. Editorial control Guest reviews should only be published after verification by qualified editorial staff of the authenticity and reliability of the entry. 2. Prevention of manipulation 2.1 Site providers should ensure that reviews of a hotel are provided only by guests who have actually stayed at the hotel. 2.2 Ratings should be based on an arithmetic average or statistical median, excluding under both systems the best and worst 10 % of evaluations from the calculation. 2.3 The number of ratings should be a factor in the calculation of ranking. 3. Quality assurance 3.1 Site providers should ensure that hotel contact coordinates, basic content data, availability or rates figures shown on their sites are displayed accurately. 3.2 Reviews should only refer to the hotel facilities that are actually offered by the hotel. For example, an evaluation of the “gastronomic” performance of a hotel offering breakfast only should not influence the rating of this hotel. 3.3 The hotel guest should be led to comment exclusively upon the services and offers he/she actually took advantage of during his/her stay at the hotel. For example a guest not using the spa facilities or the restaurant of a hotel should refrain from posting a review of these hotel facilities. 3.4 Review sites should provide the user with evaluation criteria, which are · relevant; · with appropriate levels of detail; and · commensurate with the characteristics of the hotel. 3.5 The user should be given the opportunity to express the evaluation not only via ratings but also via “open” texts. 2.1 Os promotores dos sítios de reviews devem assegurar que estas apenas tem origem em clientes que tenham de facto permanecido no hotel. 2.2 Avaliações ( rating ) devem basear-se em médias aritméticas ou na mediana estatística, excluindo de ambos os meios os melhores e piores 10% de avaliações. 2.3 O numero de avaliações deve ser factor no cálculo do ranking . 10 princípios para Hotel review sites 2. Prevenção da manipulação
  • 9. 10 principles proposed by the hotel industry relating to “hotel review” sites 1. Editorial control Guest reviews should only be published after verification by qualified editorial staff of the authenticity and reliability of the entry. 2. Prevention of manipulation 2.1 Site providers should ensure that reviews of a hotel are provided only by guests who have actually stayed at the hotel. 2.2 Ratings should be based on an arithmetic average or statistical median, excluding under both systems the best and worst 10 % of evaluations from the calculation. 2.3 The number of ratings should be a factor in the calculation of ranking. 3. Quality assurance 3.1 Site providers should ensure that hotel contact coordinates, basic content data, availability or rates figures shown on their sites are displayed accurately. 3.2 Reviews should only refer to the hotel facilities that are actually offered by the hotel. For example, an evaluation of the “gastronomic” performance of a hotel offering breakfast only should not influence the rating of this hotel. 3.3 The hotel guest should be led to comment exclusively upon the services and offers he/she actually took advantage of during his/her stay at the hotel. For example a guest not using the spa facilities or the restaurant of a hotel should refrain from posting a review of these hotel facilities. 3.4 Review sites should provide the user with evaluation criteria, which are · relevant; · with appropriate levels of detail; and · commensurate with the characteristics of the hotel. 3.5 The user should be given the opportunity to express the evaluation not only via ratings but also via “open” texts. 3.1 Os promotores dos sítios de reviews devem assegurar que os dados básicos do hotel, incluindo as suas coordenadas ou disponibilidades são apresentados com precisão. 3.2 As reviews devem apenas fazer referência a serviços constantes de facto no portfolio da unidade. Por exemplo a avaliação da oferta gastronómica dum hotel que apenas ofereça BB nao deve influenciar o rating da unidade . 10 princípios para Hotel review sites 3. Garantia de qualidade
  • 10. 10 principles proposed by the hotel industry relating to “hotel review” sites 1. Editorial control Guest reviews should only be published after verification by qualified editorial staff of the authenticity and reliability of the entry. 2. Prevention of manipulation 2.1 Site providers should ensure that reviews of a hotel are provided only by guests who have actually stayed at the hotel. 2.2 Ratings should be based on an arithmetic average or statistical median, excluding under both systems the best and worst 10 % of evaluations from the calculation. 2.3 The number of ratings should be a factor in the calculation of ranking. 3. Quality assurance 3.1 Site providers should ensure that hotel contact coordinates, basic content data, availability or rates figures shown on their sites are displayed accurately. 3.2 Reviews should only refer to the hotel facilities that are actually offered by the hotel. For example, an evaluation of the “gastronomic” performance of a hotel offering breakfast only should not influence the rating of this hotel. 3.3 The hotel guest should be led to comment exclusively upon the services and offers he/she actually took advantage of during his/her stay at the hotel. For example a guest not using the spa facilities or the restaurant of a hotel should refrain from posting a review of these hotel facilities. 3.4 Review sites should provide the user with evaluation criteria, which are · relevant; · with appropriate levels of detail; and · commensurate with the characteristics of the hotel. 3.5 The user should be given the opportunity to express the evaluation not only via ratings but also via “open” texts. 3.3 O hóspede deve ser levado a comentar, exclusivamente, os serviços de que tenha usufruido durante a estadia no hotel. Por exemplo um hóspede que não tenha usado os serviços de spa ou de restauração deve abster-se de desenvolver review´s sobre essas ofertas. 3.4 Os sitios de reviews devem informar os navegantes sobre os critérios de avaliação, nomeadamente relevancia e niveis de detalhe adequados, compatíveis com as características do hotel. 10 princípios para Hotel review sites 3. Garantia de qualidade (cont.)
  • 11. 10 principles proposed by the hotel industry relating to “hotel review” sites 1. Editorial control Guest reviews should only be published after verification by qualified editorial staff of the authenticity and reliability of the entry. 2. Prevention of manipulation 2.1 Site providers should ensure that reviews of a hotel are provided only by guests who have actually stayed at the hotel. 2.2 Ratings should be based on an arithmetic average or statistical median, excluding under both systems the best and worst 10 % of evaluations from the calculation. 2.3 The number of ratings should be a factor in the calculation of ranking. 3. Quality assurance 3.1 Site providers should ensure that hotel contact coordinates, basic content data, availability or rates figures shown on their sites are displayed accurately. 3.2 Reviews should only refer to the hotel facilities that are actually offered by the hotel. For example, an evaluation of the “gastronomic” performance of a hotel offering breakfast only should not influence the rating of this hotel. 3.3 The hotel guest should be led to comment exclusively upon the services and offers he/she actually took advantage of during his/her stay at the hotel. For example a guest not using the spa facilities or the restaurant of a hotel should refrain from posting a review of these hotel facilities. 3.4 Review sites should provide the user with evaluation criteria, which are · relevant; · with appropriate levels of detail; and · commensurate with the characteristics of the hotel. 3.5 The user should be given the opportunity to express the evaluation not only via ratings but also via “open” texts. 3.5 Ao navegante dum sítio de reviews deve ser dada a oportunidade de avaliar, não apenas via rating , mas também em texto aberto. 10 princípios para Hotel review sites 3. Garantia de qualidade (cont.)
  • 12. 10 principles proposed by the hotel industry relating to “hotel review” sites 1. Editorial control Guest reviews should only be published after verification by qualified editorial staff of the authenticity and reliability of the entry. 2. Prevention of manipulation 2.1 Site providers should ensure that reviews of a hotel are provided only by guests who have actually stayed at the hotel. 2.2 Ratings should be based on an arithmetic average or statistical median, excluding under both systems the best and worst 10 % of evaluations from the calculation. 2.3 The number of ratings should be a factor in the calculation of ranking. 3. Quality assurance 3.1 Site providers should ensure that hotel contact coordinates, basic content data, availability or rates figures shown on their sites are displayed accurately. 3.2 Reviews should only refer to the hotel facilities that are actually offered by the hotel. For example, an evaluation of the “gastronomic” performance of a hotel offering breakfast only should not influence the rating of this hotel. 3.3 The hotel guest should be led to comment exclusively upon the services and offers he/she actually took advantage of during his/her stay at the hotel. For example a guest not using the spa facilities or the restaurant of a hotel should refrain from posting a review of these hotel facilities. 3.4 Review sites should provide the user with evaluation criteria, which are · relevant; · with appropriate levels of detail; and · commensurate with the characteristics of the hotel. 3.5 The user should be given the opportunity to express the evaluation not only via ratings but also via “open” texts. Criticas não devem ser anónimas para o promotor do sítio de reviews , por cujo intermédio a unidade hoteleira deve poder reagir. O promotor deve reconfirmar o endereço de correio electrónico usado pelo hóspede, excluindo emails temporários. 10 princípios para Hotel review sites 4. Reviews não anónimas
  • 13. 10 principles proposed by the hotel industry relating to “hotel review” sites 1. Editorial control Guest reviews should only be published after verification by qualified editorial staff of the authenticity and reliability of the entry. 2. Prevention of manipulation 2.1 Site providers should ensure that reviews of a hotel are provided only by guests who have actually stayed at the hotel. 2.2 Ratings should be based on an arithmetic average or statistical median, excluding under both systems the best and worst 10 % of evaluations from the calculation. 2.3 The number of ratings should be a factor in the calculation of ranking. 3. Quality assurance 3.1 Site providers should ensure that hotel contact coordinates, basic content data, availability or rates figures shown on their sites are displayed accurately. 3.2 Reviews should only refer to the hotel facilities that are actually offered by the hotel. For example, an evaluation of the “gastronomic” performance of a hotel offering breakfast only should not influence the rating of this hotel. 3.3 The hotel guest should be led to comment exclusively upon the services and offers he/she actually took advantage of during his/her stay at the hotel. For example a guest not using the spa facilities or the restaurant of a hotel should refrain from posting a review of these hotel facilities. 3.4 Review sites should provide the user with evaluation criteria, which are · relevant; · with appropriate levels of detail; and · commensurate with the characteristics of the hotel. 3.5 The user should be given the opportunity to express the evaluation not only via ratings but also via “open” texts. 5.1 Um sítio de reviews apenas deverá visualizar reviews quando o número de críticas/comentários para uma determinada unidade for significativa relativamente ao seu numero de quartos. 5.2 Neste contexto o promotor do sítio deve prestar particular atenção á supervisão de reviews individuais até que o numero mínimo crítico seja alcançado. 10 princípios para Hotel review sites 5. Numero mínimo garantido de reviews
  • 14. 10 principles proposed by the hotel industry relating to “hotel review” sites 1. Editorial control Guest reviews should only be published after verification by qualified editorial staff of the authenticity and reliability of the entry. 2. Prevention of manipulation 2.1 Site providers should ensure that reviews of a hotel are provided only by guests who have actually stayed at the hotel. 2.2 Ratings should be based on an arithmetic average or statistical median, excluding under both systems the best and worst 10 % of evaluations from the calculation. 2.3 The number of ratings should be a factor in the calculation of ranking. 3. Quality assurance 3.1 Site providers should ensure that hotel contact coordinates, basic content data, availability or rates figures shown on their sites are displayed accurately. 3.2 Reviews should only refer to the hotel facilities that are actually offered by the hotel. For example, an evaluation of the “gastronomic” performance of a hotel offering breakfast only should not influence the rating of this hotel. 3.3 The hotel guest should be led to comment exclusively upon the services and offers he/she actually took advantage of during his/her stay at the hotel. For example a guest not using the spa facilities or the restaurant of a hotel should refrain from posting a review of these hotel facilities. 3.4 Review sites should provide the user with evaluation criteria, which are · relevant; · with appropriate levels of detail; and · commensurate with the characteristics of the hotel. 3.5 The user should be given the opportunity to express the evaluation not only via ratings but also via “open” texts. 6.1 De forma a melhorar a sua fiabilidade e comparabilidade, os sítios de reviews de serviços hoteleiros devem esforçar-se por harmonizar as suas escalas de rating , ascendentes de 1 (pior) a 10 (melhor), bem como dar orientações sobre o significado da classificação. Em nenhuma circustância devem ser usadas estrelas, para que nenhuma confusão com a classificação hoteleira possa ser feita. 10 princípios para Hotel review sites 6. Harmonização de escalas de rating
  • 15. 10 principles proposed by the hotel industry relating to “hotel review” sites 1. Editorial control Guest reviews should only be published after verification by qualified editorial staff of the authenticity and reliability of the entry. 2. Prevention of manipulation 2.1 Site providers should ensure that reviews of a hotel are provided only by guests who have actually stayed at the hotel. 2.2 Ratings should be based on an arithmetic average or statistical median, excluding under both systems the best and worst 10 % of evaluations from the calculation. 2.3 The number of ratings should be a factor in the calculation of ranking. 3. Quality assurance 3.1 Site providers should ensure that hotel contact coordinates, basic content data, availability or rates figures shown on their sites are displayed accurately. 3.2 Reviews should only refer to the hotel facilities that are actually offered by the hotel. For example, an evaluation of the “gastronomic” performance of a hotel offering breakfast only should not influence the rating of this hotel. 3.3 The hotel guest should be led to comment exclusively upon the services and offers he/she actually took advantage of during his/her stay at the hotel. For example a guest not using the spa facilities or the restaurant of a hotel should refrain from posting a review of these hotel facilities. 3.4 Review sites should provide the user with evaluation criteria, which are · relevant; · with appropriate levels of detail; and · commensurate with the characteristics of the hotel. 3.5 The user should be given the opportunity to express the evaluation not only via ratings but also via “open” texts. Em qualquer caso ( review positiva ou negativa), o sitio de reviews deve automaticamente oferecer ao hotel a possibilidade de reagir (usando por exemplo um sistema de alertas por email ). Desta forma possibilita-se á unidade o acesso e a gestão das queixas do cliente de forma activa e on-time Quando disponível, deverá tambem ser facilitado acesso aos serviços de coordenação/supervisão da actividade hoteleira ou seus mediadores. 10 princípios para Hotel review sites 7. Direito de resposta
  • 16. 10 principles proposed by the hotel industry relating to “hotel review” sites 1. Editorial control Guest reviews should only be published after verification by qualified editorial staff of the authenticity and reliability of the entry. 2. Prevention of manipulation 2.1 Site providers should ensure that reviews of a hotel are provided only by guests who have actually stayed at the hotel. 2.2 Ratings should be based on an arithmetic average or statistical median, excluding under both systems the best and worst 10 % of evaluations from the calculation. 2.3 The number of ratings should be a factor in the calculation of ranking. 3. Quality assurance 3.1 Site providers should ensure that hotel contact coordinates, basic content data, availability or rates figures shown on their sites are displayed accurately. 3.2 Reviews should only refer to the hotel facilities that are actually offered by the hotel. For example, an evaluation of the “gastronomic” performance of a hotel offering breakfast only should not influence the rating of this hotel. 3.3 The hotel guest should be led to comment exclusively upon the services and offers he/she actually took advantage of during his/her stay at the hotel. For example a guest not using the spa facilities or the restaurant of a hotel should refrain from posting a review of these hotel facilities. 3.4 Review sites should provide the user with evaluation criteria, which are · relevant; · with appropriate levels of detail; and · commensurate with the characteristics of the hotel. 3.5 The user should be given the opportunity to express the evaluation not only via ratings but also via “open” texts. Comentários deixados pelos hospedes devem ser verdadeiros e com base nas experiências pessoais dos seus autores. Os hoteleiros têm o direito legal de protecção contra as críticas difamatórias. Declarações falsas devem ser retirados dos sites de forma rápida e não burocrática 10 princípios para Hotel review sites 8. Segurança jurídica
  • 17. 10 principles proposed by the hotel industry relating to “hotel review” sites 1. Editorial control Guest reviews should only be published after verification by qualified editorial staff of the authenticity and reliability of the entry. 2. Prevention of manipulation 2.1 Site providers should ensure that reviews of a hotel are provided only by guests who have actually stayed at the hotel. 2.2 Ratings should be based on an arithmetic average or statistical median, excluding under both systems the best and worst 10 % of evaluations from the calculation. 2.3 The number of ratings should be a factor in the calculation of ranking. 3. Quality assurance 3.1 Site providers should ensure that hotel contact coordinates, basic content data, availability or rates figures shown on their sites are displayed accurately. 3.2 Reviews should only refer to the hotel facilities that are actually offered by the hotel. For example, an evaluation of the “gastronomic” performance of a hotel offering breakfast only should not influence the rating of this hotel. 3.3 The hotel guest should be led to comment exclusively upon the services and offers he/she actually took advantage of during his/her stay at the hotel. For example a guest not using the spa facilities or the restaurant of a hotel should refrain from posting a review of these hotel facilities. 3.4 Review sites should provide the user with evaluation criteria, which are · relevant; · with appropriate levels of detail; and · commensurate with the characteristics of the hotel. 3.5 The user should be given the opportunity to express the evaluation not only via ratings but also via “open” texts. Os sitios de reviews devem apenas mostrar reviews actuais. No máximo dois anos depois de ter sido lançada, uma review não deve mais influenciar o rating a que está afecta. Deve também ser eliminada nesse momento. 10 princípios para Hotel review sites 9. Dados actualizados
  • 18. 10 principles proposed by the hotel industry relating to “hotel review” sites 1. Editorial control Guest reviews should only be published after verification by qualified editorial staff of the authenticity and reliability of the entry. 2. Prevention of manipulation 2.1 Site providers should ensure that reviews of a hotel are provided only by guests who have actually stayed at the hotel. 2.2 Ratings should be based on an arithmetic average or statistical median, excluding under both systems the best and worst 10 % of evaluations from the calculation. 2.3 The number of ratings should be a factor in the calculation of ranking. 3. Quality assurance 3.1 Site providers should ensure that hotel contact coordinates, basic content data, availability or rates figures shown on their sites are displayed accurately. 3.2 Reviews should only refer to the hotel facilities that are actually offered by the hotel. For example, an evaluation of the “gastronomic” performance of a hotel offering breakfast only should not influence the rating of this hotel. 3.3 The hotel guest should be led to comment exclusively upon the services and offers he/she actually took advantage of during his/her stay at the hotel. For example a guest not using the spa facilities or the restaurant of a hotel should refrain from posting a review of these hotel facilities. 3.4 Review sites should provide the user with evaluation criteria, which are · relevant; · with appropriate levels of detail; and · commensurate with the characteristics of the hotel. 3.5 The user should be given the opportunity to express the evaluation not only via ratings but also via “open” texts. Como forma de aumentar a transparência para com os clientes, os sítios de reviews devem indicar quando usam sistema próprio de classificação e fornecer informação sobre o sistema oficial de classificação hoteleira em vigor no país do hotel, incluindo link para o sistema de classificação aplicável. Os sítios de review devem verificar, pelo menos uma vez por ano, junto das autoridades competentes,a classificação (oficial) dos hóteis que promovem. Devem tambem incluir referências aos sistemas de qualidade em vigor nas unidades. 10 princípios para Hotel review sites 10. Indicação da classificação oficial ( )
  • 19.  
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22. Connecting People @ www.tourismthinktank.pt