Pp 13 johali presentation in program iccec aangepast 4

Program at a glance per day

Wednesday, May 18
16:00 – 20:00 Registration desk open
16:00 – 20:00 Poster mounting Poster area
17:30 – 18:30 Public Lecture Aula
18:30 – 20:00 Welcome reception & Ethics market Foyer

Thursday, May 19
08:00 – 09:00 Coffee, tea & postermounting Poster area
09:00 – 09:30 Formal Opening Aula
09:30 – 11:00 Plenary panel sessions on state of the art of ethics Aula K-001-002
11:00 – 11:30 Coffee & tea break Poster area
11:30 – 13:00 Parallel Session I
Informed Consent, nurses and strikes & withdraw life support Aula OP-001-003
Training and education of clinical ethics professionals I 01A05 OP-004-005
Being a patient, management of moral deliberation & training OP-007-009
curriculum 02A06
Goals and justifications of clinical ethics services (CES) I 04A04 OP-010-012
The relationship between CES and quality of care & moral OP-013-015
competence & policy I 04A05
The Importance of Addressing Religious and Cultural Issues in PS-1
End-of-Life Clinical Decisions 08A00
Clinical Ethics across Continents and Cultures: A Case Discussion PS-2
about Bad Blood 12A05
Mediation Tools To Manage Identity Conflict in Clinical Ethics WS-1
Consultation BV-0H53
13:00 – 14:00 Lunch & poster viewing Poster area
14:00 – 15:30 Parallel Session II
Empirical research on the quality, evaluation, processes and OP-019-021
products of CES I Auditorium
Training and education of clinical ethics professionals II 01A05 OP-022-024
Formats and structures of clinical ethics services (CES) I 02A06 OP-025-027
Goals and justifications of clinical ethics services (CES) II 04A04 OP-028-030
The relation between CES and quality of care & moral competence OP-031-033
& policy II 04A05
Others and the relation between CES and quality 05A06 PP-01-09
Evaluation of Training of Health Care Professionals into Facilitators PS-3
of Moral Deliberation 08A00
Thinking like a psychologist: Useful tools from clinical psychology WS-2
for the ethics consultant BV-0H53
16:00 – 17:30 Parallel Session III
Moral theory and moral expertise in CES and the use of OP-034-036
conversation methods Auditorium
Training and education of clinical ethics professionals III 01A05 OP-037-039
Formats and structures of clinical ethics services (CES) II 02A06 OP-040-042
Goals and justifications of clinical ethics services (CES) III 04A04 OP-043-045
Single Case Discussions I 04A05 OP-046-048
Empirical research on the quality, evaluation, processes and OP-049-051
products of CES II 05A06
Moving Beyond the Case: Strategies for Responding to Moral PS-4
Distress 08A00
The seven stage model of moral case deliberation: training WS-3
healthcare professionals as moral case deliberation facilitators BV-
0H53

Program

Wednesday, May 18
16:00 – 20:00 Registration Registration desk open
desk

16:00 – 20:00 Poster area Poster mounting

17:30 – 18:30 Aula Public Lecture
Chair: Guy Widdershoven

Responsibility and Authority: Multiple Perspectives on Clinical
Ethics
Prof.dr. Joan Tronto (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, United
States of America)

18:30 – 20:00 Foyer Welcome reception & Ethics market

Thursday, May 19
desk

08:00 – 09:00 Poster area Coffee, tea & poster mounting

09:00 – 09:30 Aula Formal Opening

Formal Opening
Prof.dr. Guy Widdershoven (VU university medical center,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

Introduction to history of ICCEC
Prof.dr. George Agich (Bowling Green State University, Ohio, United
States of America)

Opening music organ player: Playing Bach on a congress of
Ethici?
Jean van Cleef, The Netherlands

09:30 – 11:00 Aula Plenary panel sessions on state of the art of ethics

K-001 Towards a naturalized clinical ethics
Prof.dr. Marian Verkerk (University Medical Center Groningen,
Groningen, The Netherlands)

K-002 Committees, cases, and challenges in the UK
Dr. Anne Slowther (Warwick Medical School, Coventry, United
Kingdom)

11:00 – 11:30 Poster area Coffee & tea break

PARALLEL SESSION I

11:30 – 13:00 Auditorium Informed Consent, nurses and strikes & withdraw life support
Chair:

OP-001 Medicine, the Media and Moving Standards of Informed Consent
in Organ Donation and Transplantation
Eleanor Milligan (Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia)

OP-002 Caring for Patients during Strikes: a Survey of Nurses’ Dilemmas
Ikeoluwa Okerin (Obafemi Awolowo Teaching Hospital, Ife, Nigeria)

OP-003 To Apply Moderate Zero Line View to Clinical Ethics Services in
Intensive Care
Yen-Yuan Chen (National Taiwan University College of Medicine,
Taipei, Taiwan)

11:30 – 13:00 01A05 Training and education of clinical ethics professionals I
Chair:

OP-004 A bridge over troubled waters: Linking emotions, cognitions and
ethical responses in everyday clinical practice
Paquita de Zuluete (Imperial College London, London, United
Kingdom)

OP-005 ‘Imagine you are a financially poor student…’ making Ethics
relevant to your audience when strict time constraints exist
Ruth Todd (Staffordshire University, Stafford, United Kingdom)

11:30 – 13:00 02A06 Being a patient, management of moral deliberation & training
curriculum
Chair:

OP-007 Moving and Re-moving Ethics. Being a Patient in the Internet-
World
Elena Teodora Manea (University of Medicine and Pharmacy Gr. T.
Popa Iasi, Exeter, United Kingdom)

OP-008 How (not) to manage moral case deliberation in a health care
institution?
Frans Kamsteeg (GGNet, Warnsveld, The Netherlands)

OP-009 Building Ethics Consultation and Consultation Training into an
Innovative Medical School Curriculum
Marin Gillis (Herbert Wertheim School of Medicine, Miami, United
States of America)

11:30 – 13:00 04A04 Goals and justifications of clinical ethics services (CES) I
Chair:

OP-010 Ethos of Russian Medicine and Perspectives of Clinical Ethics
and Consultation
Elena Grebenshchikova (Kursk State Medical University, Kursk,
Russia)

OP-011 Commitment in clinical ethics consultations: a benefit or a risk?
Nicolas Foureur (Cochin Hospital, Paris, France)

OP-012 ?????
Hilbert Fleddérus (Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport, The Hague,
The Netherlands)

11:30 – 13:00 04A05 The relationship between CES and quality of care & moral
competence & policy I
Chair:

OP-013 Mapping the gaps in capacity decision support: moving toward
clarity in the muddle
Christopher Benitez (University of California, San Francisco, United
States of America)

OP-014 Teaching Ethical Competency to Medical Students – When to Call
for a Consult
Katharine Meacham (Mars Hill College, Mars Hill, United States of
America)

OP-015 A Role for Ethics Consultation in Enhancing Conscientious
Practice in Health Care
Erin O’Donnell (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States of America)

11:30 – 13:00 08A00 The Importance of Addressing Religious and Cultural Issues in
End-of-Life Clinical Decisions
Chair: James Walter

PS-1.1 The Importance of Addressing Religious Traditions in End-of-Life
Clinical Decisions
James Walter (Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, United
States of America)

PS-1.2 The Importance of Addressing Religious Issues in End-of-Life
Clinical Decisions
Robert J. Walter (Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington DC,
United States of America)

PS-1.3 The Importance of Addressing Cultural Issues in End-of-Life
Clinical Decisions
Jennifer K. Walter (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States of
America)

11:30 – 13:00 12A05 Clinical Ethics across Continents and Cultures: A Case
Discussion about Bad Blood
Chair: Nicholas Kockler

PS-2.1 Clinical Ethics across Continents and Cultures: A Case
Nicholas Kockler (Providence Health and Services, Portland, United
States of America)

Vina Vaswani (Yenepoya University, Mangalore, India)

Anita Ho (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada)

…Ilkilic (History, Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine, Mainz, Germany)

11:30 – 13:00 BV-0H53 Mediation Tools To Manage Identity Conflict in Clinical Ethics
Consultation
Chair: Lauren Edelstein

WS-1 Mediation Tools To Manage Identify Conflict in Clinical Ethics
Consultation
Lauren Edelstein (Johns Hopkins Howard Country General Hospital,
Columbia, United States of America)

13:00 – 14:00 Poster area Lunch & poster viewing

PARALLEL SESSION II

14:00 – 15:30 Auditorium Empirical research on the quality, evaluation, processes and
products of CES I
Chair:

OP-019 Ethical challenges and how to develop ethics support in
community health care
Lillian Lillemoen (University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway)

OP-020 A method for detecting ethically challenging situations in end-of-
life decision making
Eva Winkler (University Hospital of the Ludwig Maximilian University
Munich, Munich, Germany)

OP-021 The Implicit morality of child abuse detection at ER’s
Jos Kole (Ethics Institute – University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The
Netherlands)

14:00 – 15:30 01A05 Training and education of clinical ethics professionals II
Chair:

OP-022 Impact of training on the implementation of ethics consultation
services: lessons learnt from a German educational programme
Andrea Dörries (Center for Health Ethics, Hannover, Germany)

OP-023 From Baseline to Online: Orientation for clinical ethics consult
service team members
Joan Henriksen Hellyer (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States of
America)

OP-024 The Value of Logic for Clinical Ethics
Constance Perry (Drexel University, Elkins Park, United States of
America)

14:00 – 15:30 02A06 Formats and structures of clinical ethics services (CES) I
Chair:

OP-025 Paediatric Clinical Ethics Service delivery in Australia
Catherine Lees (The Royal Children’s Hospital, Parkville, Australia)

OP-026 Doctering With Borders: Ethics of Care in the Intensive Care Unit
(ICU)
Mieke Visser (Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

OP-027 Making it Work: Teamwork in Ethics Consultation
Andrea Frolic (Hamilton Health Sciences and McMaster University,
Hamilton, Canada)

14:00 – 15:30 04A04 Goals and justifications of clinical ethics services (CES) II
Chair: Marian Verkerk

OP-028 Models of ethics support in institutional elderly care, a literature
review
Sandra van der Dam (University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The
Netherlands)

OP-029 Moving on after a medical error. Should HECs and clinical
ethicists get involved in disclosure?
Linda Scheirton (Creighton University, Omaha, United States of
America)

OP-030 Reflections on two studies of staff’s ethical diaries in adult and in
child and adolescent psychiatric inpatient care
Veikko Pelto-Piri (Psychiatric research center, Orebro, Sweden)

14:00 – 15:30 04A05 The relation between CES and quality of care & moral
competence & policy II
Chair: John F. Tuohey

OP-031 The mentally disabled person has a will – but often no voice
Klaus Kobert (Evangelisches Krankenhaus Bielefeld, Bielefeld,
Germany)

OP-033 Clinical ethics consultations family ‘moral order’ and the
justification of French laws concerning access to reproductive
technologies
Denis Berthiau (University Paris Descartes, Malakoff, France)

14:00 – 15:30 05A06 Others and the relation between CES and quality
Chair:

PP-01 A Discussion on End of Life Treatment Decision Making
Juan Pablo Beca (Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile)

PP-02 Can children decide to participate in research?
Irma Hein (De Bascule, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

PP-03 Ethical issues involved in patients requesting and clinicians
making diagnoses
Ananta Dave (Dudley and Walsall Mental Health Partnership NHS
Trust, Sutton Coldfield, United Kingdom)

PP-04 Evaluation of ethical aspect in clinical practice guidelines
Radim Licenik (Palacky University Faculty of Medicine, Olomouc,
Czech Republic)

PP-05 Truth-telling in cancer patients in a global society
Cristine Gavrilovici (University of Medicine and Pharmacy Gr. T. Popa,
Iasi, Romania)

PP-07 Realization of autonomy principle in clinical practice in Ukraine
Liudmila Paliei (National Medical Academy for Post-Graduate
Education named after P.L. Shupyk, Kyiv, Ukraine)

PP-08 The Ethical Debates of Inter-professional Conflicts: a Case Study
in Nigeria
Samuel Aliyu (Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Osogbo,
Nigeria)

PP-09 Ethical warrants of guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of
children and adolescents with ADHD
Wilma Göttgens-Jansen (Radboud University Nijmegen Medical
Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands)

14:00 – 15:30 08A00 Evaluation of Training of Health Care Professionals into
Facilitators of Moral Deliberation
Chair: Bert Molewijk

PS-3.1 Philosophical background of a training for facilitators of moral
deliberation
Bert Molewijk (VU university medical center, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands)

PS-3.2 Aims and didactics of training facilitators moral deliberation
Menno de Bree (University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen,
The Netherlands)

PS-3.3 Empirical evaluation of the training. Skills, competencies &
institutional experience
Bert Molewijk (VU university medical center, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands)

14:00 – 15:30 BV-0H53 Thinking like a psychologist: Useful tools from clinical
psychology for the ethics consultant
Chair:

WS-2 Thinking like a psychologist: Useful tools from clinical
psychology for the ethics consultant
Cynthia Griggins (University Hospitals Case Medical Center,
Cleveland, United States of America)


PARALLEL SESSION III

16:00 – 17:30 Auditorium Moral theory and moral expertise in CES and the use of
conversation methods
Chair:

OP-034 On the Role of the Clinical Ethicist
Zuzana Deans (University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom)

OP-035 A psychological model to analyze and solve moral conflicts in
ethics consultation
Gerald Neitzke (Hannover Medical University, Hannover, Germany)

OP-036 Ethic and irony
Guido Giacomo Gattai (University of Florence, Florence, Italy)

16:00 – 17:30 01A05 Training and education of clinical ethics professionals III
Chair:

OP-037 How many history direct current ethical decision-making in
clinical psychiatry: implications for ethics training and daily
practice
Rael Strous (Beer Yaakov Mental Health Center, Beer Yaakov, Israël)

OP-038 From pseudo philosopher towards ethically competent
professional? Questioning the necessity of ethical theory in
professional ethics education
Mariëtte van den Hoven (University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The
Netherlands)

OP-039 Nurses’ Competencies for Participation in Ethics Committees
Bart Cusveller (Christian University of Applied Sciences, Ede, The
Netherlands)

16:00 – 17:30 02A06 Formats and structures of clinical ethics services (CES) II
Chair:

OP-040 Moving CEC to New Frontiers: A Collaboration between a Social
Entrepreneur and Clinical Ethics Consultant
Kate Ettinger (Center for Health Professions, San Francisco, United
States of America)

OP-041 Moving from the Bedside into the Community: Experience of a
clinical ethicist in a community Advance Care Planning
Workshop
States of America)

OP-042 Moving from Elder Mediation to Elder Ethics: Designing a
Different Hat for CEC in the Community Setting
States of America)

16:00 – 17:30 04A04 Goals and justifications of clinical ethics services (CES) III
Chair:

OP-043 The clinical ethics consultation (CEC): clarification tool for
physicians and patients to avoid complaints?
Dario Sacchini (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore – Institute of
Bioethics, Rome, Italy)

OP-044 Where Should We Go from Here? Transformation of Ethics
Services in a Culture of Excellence
Nicholas Kockler (Providence Health and Services, Portland, United
States of America)

OP-045 Clinical ethics consultation and the concept of ownership
Louise Campbell (Trinity College Dublin, Limerick, Ireland)

16:00 – 17:30 04A05 Single Case Discussions I
Chair:

OP-046 Liver transplantation criteria, their interpretation and application:
Challenges raised by the case of JT
Katherine Duthie (Royal Alexandra Hospital, Edmonton, Canada)

OP-047 An ethical process about information in an Alzheimer disease
clinical case in a familial context
Pierre Boitte (Centre d’éthique médicale, Lille, France)

OP-048 Phoenix Arizona Case: Imminent Threat of Death in Pregnancy
Gerard Magill (Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, United States of
America)

16:00 – 17:30 05A06 Empirical research on the quality, evaluation, processes and
products of CES II
Chair:

OP-049 Moral deliberation in psychiatry. Needs and expectations of
employees in a Dutch psychiatric organisation regarding moral
deliberation
Maarten van Woelderen (Radboud University Nijmegen Medical
Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands)

OP-050 The Use of Practical and Innovative Tools to Improve the Quality
of Ethics Consultation
Ellen Fox (VA National Center for Ethics in Health Care, Washington
DC, United States of America)

OP-051 Clinical Ethics Committees and the Language of Care
Helen Kohlen (Philosophic Theological University of Vallendar,
Vallendar, Germany)

16:00 – 17:30 08A00 Moving Beyond the Case: Strategies for Responding to Moral
Distress
Chair: Lucia Wocial

PS-4.1 Moving Beyond the Case: Strategies for Responding to Moral
Distress
Lucia Wocial (Clarian Health, Indianapolis, United States of America)

16:00 – 17:30 BV-0H53 The seven stage model of moral case deliberation: training
healthcare professionals as moral case deliberation facilitators
Chair: Menno de Bree

WS-3 The seven stage model of moral case deliberation: training
healthcare professionals as moral case deliberation facilitators
Menno de Bree (University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen,
The Netherlands)

Friday, May 20
08:00 – 09:00 Coffee & tea Poster area
09:00 – 11:00 Plenary panel session Aula K-003-004
11:30 – 13:00 Parallel Session IV
Goals and justifications of clinical ethics services (CES) IV OP-052-054
Auditorium
Training and education of clinical ethics professionals IV 01A05 OP-055-056
The involvement of clients and family members in CES I 02A06 OP-058-060
Empirical research and the involvement of clients and family OP-061-063
members in CES 04A04
& policy III 04A05
The involvement of clients and empirical research and goals and PP-10-18
justifications and training of clinical ethics professionals 05A06
Clinical Ethics Support – success or failure? An organizational PS-5
perspective 10A00
Evaluation of Clinical ethics Consultation (CES)/Moral Deliberation PS-6
(MD) 06A04
Emotions in moral case deliberation. Is there a right way of dealing WS-4
with emotions? BV-0H19
13:00 – 14:00 Lunch & poster viewing Poster area
14:00 – 15:30 Parallel Session V
Training and education of c linical ethics professionals and the OP-067-069
image of clinical ethics Auditorium
Training and education of clinical ethics professionals V 01A05 OP-070-071
Formats and structures of clinical ethics services (CES) III 02A06 OP-073-075
Public Health & Advanced Directives 04A04 OP-076-078
Single Case Discussions II 04A05 OP-079-081
Moral theory and moral expertise in CES I 05A06 OP-082-083
Moral Responsibilities and Mental Health 10A00 PS-7
Moralmap.com: website for moral reflection BV-0H19 WS-5
16:00 – 17:30 Parallel Session VI
Training and education of clinical ethics professionals VI Auditorium OP-085-087
The involvement of clients and family members in CES II 01A05 OP-088-090
Formats and structures of clinical ethics services (CES) IV 02A06 OP-091-093
Moral theory and moral expertise in CES II 04A04 OP-094-096
& policy IV 04A05
Empirical research and moral theory 05A06 PP-19-27
Competing Roles of a Clinical Ethics Consultant: Advocacy and PS-8
Value-Neutral Mediation 10A00
Moving Ethics: an experiential workshop connecting body and WS-6
mind in ethics consultation practice BV-0H19
18:00 – 22:30 Conference Dinner Rosarium

Friday, May 20
desk

08:00 – 09:00 Poster area Coffee & tea

09:00 – 11:00 Aula Plenary panel session

K-003 Certification of the field: ASBH Taskforce
Prof.dr. Mark Aulisio (Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland,

K-004 Clinical ethics in developing countries
Prof.dr. Henk ten Have (Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, United States of
America)


PARALLEL SESSION IV

11:30 – 13:00 Auditorium Goals and justifications of clinical ethics services (CES) IV
Chair:

OP-052 Ethicist stat! Towards providing timely ethics consults to the
Emergency Department
Jacky Parker (The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada)

OP-053 Evaluating Ethics Consultation
Thomas May (Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, United
States of America)

OP-054 Relevance of the Normative Function of a Clinical Ethics
Committee. Elaboration of a guideline for blood transfusions in
Jehovah’s Witness patients
María Inés Gómez (Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile)

11:30 – 13:00 01A05 Training and education of clinical ethics professionals IV
Chair:

OP-055 Combined use of the ‘Four Topics’ and ‘Clinical Casuistry’
methods in clinical ethics case consultation: a new approach
Robert Walker (USF College of Medicine, Florida, United States of
America)

OP-056 Health Professional’s knowledge and perception about Informed
Consent in a Cuban Hospital
Dirce Guilhem (University of Brasilia College of Health Sciences,
Brasilia, Brazil)

11:30 – 13:00 02A06 The involvement of clients and family members in CES I
Chair:

OP-058 The Dilemma of the Right to Die in Cameroon
Martin Anu Nkematabong (University of Yaounde, Yaounde,
Cameroon)

OP-059 Violation of ethical principles: confusion about what is/is not
euthanasia and fear of litigation means patients are dying in
extreme pain and suffering
Colleen Cartwright (Southern Cross University, Tweed Heads,
Australia)

OP-060 Patient/Relative Participation in Ethical Consultations: a Nigerian
Experience
Michael Afolabi (Lautech, Osogbro, Nigeria)

11:30 – 13:00 04A04 Empirical research and the involvement of clients and family
members in CES
Chair:

OP-061 Moving by experience; aims and results in moral case
deliberation
Frouk Weidema (VU university medical center/GGNet, Warnsveld, the
Netherlands)

OP-062 Aiming at equality; Experiences with client participation in moral
case deliberation
Leonard van Wijk (VU university medical center/GGNet, Warnsveld,
the Netherlands)

OP-063 Physicians’ awareness and opinions about clinical ethics
consultation: Data from Turkey
Murat Civaner (Uludag University School of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey)

competence & policy III
Chair:

OP-064 Clinical Ethics Consultation Moving through Concentric Circles:
the perspective of organizational ethics
Renzo Pegoraro (Fondazione Lanza, Padova, Italy)

OP-065 Utilizing Clinical Ethics Consult Deliberations to Inform Leaders
and Policy Makers in Integrated Health Systems
Eric Wasylenko (Alberta Health Services, Okotoks, Canada)

OP-066 Developing Practice Standards for Healthcare Ethics: The
Canadian Approach
Cheryl Cline (Queens University and Kingston General Hospital,
Kingston, Canada)

11:30 – 13:00 05A06 The involvement of clients and empirical research and goals and
justifications and training of clinical ethics professionals
Chair:

PP-10 Realization of principles and rules of bioethics in the medical
legislation of Russia
Irina Aseeva (South-West State University, Kursk, Russia)

PP-11 Access to Health Care: Perceptions of People Living with
HIV/AIDS
Ravi Vaswani (Yenepoya University, Mangalore, India)

PP-12 Ethics consultation: who is the target?
Juan Pablo Beca (Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile)

PP-13 Place of Ethics in SE Health Professions Education and Practice
Eisa Johali (King Saud University Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi
Arabia)

PP-14 ‘I have learnt to exercise silence’. Senior medical students and
their ethics reports: some challenges for medical educators
Phillipa Malpas (University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand)

PP-15 An evaluation of bioethics learning to undergraduate medical
students
Lorna Luco (Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago, Chile)

PP-16 The case-construction method in courses for clinical ethics
Kenji Hattori (Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine,
Gunma, Japan)

PP-17 New Approach for Teaching Bioethics to Nursing students
Dorit Rubinstein (Zefat Academic College, Yehud, Israël)

PP-18 What is a role of the instructor in medical ethics case study?
Akiko Miyagi (Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine,
Gunma, Japan)

11:30 – 13:00 10A00 Clinical Ethics Support – success or failure? An organizational
perspective
Chair: Ana Borovecki

PS-5.1 The impact of the organisation on clinical ethics services
Andrea Dörries (Center for Health Ethics, Hannover, Germany)

PS-5.2 CEC- well-meant, but dysfunctional activities in the realm of
medical ethics In the countries in transition
Ana Borovecki (University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia)

PS-5.3 ‘Taking Ethics Out of Isolation: A Systems Approach to
Organizational Quality Improvement’
Evan DeRenzo (Washington Hospital Center, Rockville Maryland,

PS-5.4 Case study: a thematic discussion group on respect for elderly
people in a French hospital
Pierre Boitte (Centre d’éthique médicale, Lille, France)

11:30 – 13:00 06A04 Evaluation of Clinical ethics Consultation (CEC)/Moral
Deliberation (MD)
Chair: Jan Schildmann

PS-6.1 Evaluation of Clinical Ethics Consultation (CEC)/Moral
Deliberation (MD)
Jan Schildmann (Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany)

PS-6.2 Normativity in the evaluation of clinical ethics consultation (CEC)
& moral deliberation (MD): a critical review and plea for a theory
and context sensitive approach
Jan Schildmann (Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany)

PS-6.3 Evaluation and normativity of CEC/MD
Gerald Neitzke (Hannover Medical University, Hannover, Germany)

PS-6.4 Is the discussion of patient cases in clinical ethics- committees
useful for the clinicians?
Reidun Førde (University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway)

PS-6.5 Evaluation of moral case deliberation through responsive
evaluation. Dialogue on dialogue
Bert Molewijk (VU university medical center/GGNet, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands)

11:30 – 13:00 BV-0H19 Emotions in moral case deliberation. Is there a right way of
dealing with emotions?
Chair: Dick Kleinlugtenbelt

WS-4 Emotions in moral case deliberation
Dick Kleinlugtenbelt (GGNet, Warnsveld, the Netherlands)

13:00 – 14:00 Poster area Lunch & poster viewing

PARALLEL SESSION V

14:00 – 15:30 Auditorium Training and education of clinical ethics professionals and the
image of clinical ethics
Chair:

OP-067 Advance Care Planning: benefits and challenges of
implementation at a health care facility
Elizabeth Clark (JJ Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, United States of
America)

OP-068 Training Ethics Committee Members as a Necessary Step
Naama Wietchner (International Center for Health Law and Ethics, Zur
Yigal, Israël)

OP-069 Who’s Afraid of Ethics Consultations?
Kurt Schmidt (Center for Medical Ethics, Frankfurt, Germany)

14:00 – 15:30 01A05 Training and education of clinical ethics professionals V
Chair:

OP-070 A Comparison of Methods of Training
Robert Orr (Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, United States of
America)

OP-071 Informational Deficits in Clinical Ethics Consultation: When
clinicians (unintentionally) manipulate facts to achieve a
preferred outcome
Daryl Pullman (Memorial University, St. John’s Newfoundland &
Labrador, Canada)

14:00 – 15:30 02A06 Formats and structures of clinical ethics services (CES) III
Chair:

OP-073 Moving Clinical Ethics Consultation Services into the Future:
Becoming Proactive; a Necessary Paradigm Shift
Thomas Foreman (The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada)

OP-074 Moving Ethics into the Community
Mary Caldwell (Mission Hospital, Asheville, United States of America)

OP-075 Good policymaking in clinical ethics: from a sense of urgency to
institutional change in the case of artificial nutrition and
hydration
Jürgen Wallner (Hospital of St. John of God, Vienna, Austria)

14:00 – 15:30 04A04 Public Health & Advanced Directives
Chair:

OP-076 Clinical Ethics Consultation as a Model for Public Health Ethics
Consultation
Jaro Kotalik (Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Canada)

OP-077 Missing the Mark? Advance Health Directive’s (AHD) in a Tertiary
Referral Hospital in Australia

OP-078 Ethics of Embryo Research: A Muslim Perspectives
Ahmed Ragab (Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt)

14:00 – 15:30 04A05 Single Case Discussions II
Chair:

OP-079 Are We Doing the Right Thing? Dealing with Moral Distress in the
Clinical Setting
Kurt Smidt-Jernstrom (Kaiser Sunnyside Medical Center, Clackamas,

OP-080 The Ethical Challenge of Smoking in Hospitals: A Moving Tale

OP-081 Ethics Consultation and the Possibility of Psychiatric Terminal
Illness?
Mark Aulisio (Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, United
States of America)

14:00 – 15:30 05A06 Moral theory and moral expertise in CES I
Chair:

OP-082 To Account for or To Disregard Social Vulnerability when
Allocating Resources
K.G. Gervais (Minnesota Center for Health Care Ethics, St. Paul,

OP-083 Moral Courage: Necessary Skill for Moral Expertise
Vicki Lachman (Drexel University, Philadelphia, United States of
America)

14:00 – 15:30 10A00 Moral Responsibilities and Mental Health
Chair: Elleke Landeweer

PS-7.1 Explaining why mental disorders can influence moral
responsibility
Gerben Meynen (GGZ Ingeest, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

PS-7.2 Seclusion and responsibility: dilemmas and limitations in
reducing seclusion
Cecile Gijsbers van Wijk (GGZ Ingeest, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

PS-7.3 Moral Responsibilities and Mental Health
Elleke Landeweer (VU university medical center, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands)

PS-7.4 Moving health care professionals in moral case deliberation: a
dialogue about responsibility
Margreet Stolper (VU university medical center, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands)

14:00 – 15:30 BV-0H19 Moralmap.com: website for moral reflection
Chair: Myra van Zwieten

WS-5 Moralmap.com: website for moral reflection
Myra van Zwieten (Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands)


PARALLEL SESSION VI

16:00 – 17:30 Auditorium Training and education of clinical ethics professionals VI
Chair:

OP-085 Accrediting Training Programs and Developing a Code of Ethics
for Clinical Ethics Consultants: Recent ASBH Initiatives
Robert Baker (Union Graduate College, Schenectady, United States
of America)

OP-086 Revisiting Non-physician Consultations: the Need for Ethical
Education
Michael Afolabi (Lautech, Osogbo, Nigeria)

OP-087 Bioethics and Nursing: Theory and Clinical Practice
Dirce Guilhem (University of Brasilia College of Health Sciences,
Brasilia, Brazil)

16:00 – 17:30 01A05 The involvement of clients and family members in CES II
Chair:

OP-088 Involvement of parents in Clinical Ethics Committees in end-of-
life decisions regarding children
Marianne Bahus (Section for Medical Ethics, Oslo, Norway)

OP-089 An impartial perspective – the interaction between family
members and a clinical ethicist
Dorothea Touwen (Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The
Netherlands)

OP-090 Ethical challenges in Norwegian nursing homes. The experience
of patients and next of kin
Elisabeth Gjerberg (Center of Medical Ethics, Oslo, Norway)

16:00 – 17:30 02A06 Formats and structures of clinical ethics services (CES) IV
Chair:

OP-091 Who is the clinical ethicist? – and how does that affect the
implementation of ethical support services?
Rouven Christian Porz (University Hospital Berne, Berne, Switzerland)

OP-092 Moving from the Bedside into the Clinic: Preventative Ethics
Education in an Outpatient Clinic
States of America)

OP-093 Setting up a students’ clinical ethics committee
Carolyn Johnston (King’s College London School of Medicine,
London, United Kingdom)

16:00 – 17:30 04A04 Moral theory and moral expertise in CES II
Chair:

OP-094 Conscientious objections to end-of-life procedures: a neglected
topic in clinical ethics services research
Chris Gastmans (Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium)

OP-095 Different types of expertise in clinical ethics consultation –
lessons to learn from the debate on empirical medical ethics
Sabine Salloch (Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany)

OP-096 Autothanatography: An Ethical Approach to Dying
Annette Allen (University of Louisville, Louisville, United States of
America)

competence & policy IV
Chair:

OP-097 Moral Distress & The Health Care Professional
Thompson Faller (University of Portland, Portland, United States of
America)

OP-098 Moving reproductive ethics: From the laboratory and the clinic to
the organization of maternity care
Raymond de Vries (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
of America)

OP-099 Autonomy, Dignity and Discharge of the Elderly Patient
Lynn Maitland (Trinity Health, Novi, United States of America)

16:00 – 17:30 05A06 Empirical research and moral theory
Chair:

PP-19 Patient’s will and doctors’ competence: Reasoning in clinical
ethics consultation (CEC)
Margarete Pfaefflin (Epilepsy-Center Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany)

PP-20 Taking care of elderly patients in intensive care units: a gradual
elaboration of a clinical ethics grid as an experimental co-
construction among professionals and researches in ethics
Jean-Philippe Cobbaut (Catholic University of Lille, Lille, France)

PP-21 Early Indicators of Ethical Issues: Strengthening Nurses’ Voices
Katherine Brown-Saltzman (UCLA Healthcare System, Los Angeles,

PP-22 Moral Distress Thermometer a New Screening Tool for Moral
Distress
Lucia Wocial (Clarian Health, Indianapolis, United States of America)

PP-23 The Ethics Tower of Babel: a need for common language in the
documentation and practice of clinical ethics services
Mike Kekewich (The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada)

PP-24 Ethics committees in Belarus: ethics promoters or formal
structures?
Andrei Famenka (State Service of Forensic Medicine of the Republic
of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus)

PP-25 Ethics in practice
Pernilla Pergert (Karolinska Unversity Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden)

PP-26 Clinical Ethics Support for end-of-life decisions in intensive care
– Coming of age of an innovative model
Barbara Meyer-Zehnder (University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland)

PP-27 ‘Thick ethical concepts’ in child abuse detection at ERs
Jos Kole (University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands)

16:00 – 17:30 10A00 Competing Roles of a Clinical Ethics Consultant: Advocacy and
Value-Neutral Mediation
Chair: Dien Ho

PS-8.1 Competing Roles of a Clinical Ethics Consultant: Advocacy and
Value-Neutral Mediation
Dien Ho (Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences,
Boston, United States of America)

PS-8.2 Value-Neutrality in Clinical Ethics Consultation
Dien Ho (Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences,
Boston, United States of America)

PS-8.3 Advocacy in Ethics Consultation with Vulnerable Patients: Case
Study Involving a Ward of the State
Maureen Kelley (University of Washington School of Medicine,
Seattle, United States of America)

PS-8.4 Is Advocacy Only for Patients? A Case Study
Susan Miller (Methodist Academic Medicine Associates, Houston,

PS-8.5 Approaching Advocacy in Clinical Ethics Consultation with
Caution
Lisa Rasmussen (University of North Carolina, Charlotte, United
States of America)

16:00 – 17:30 BV-0H19 Moving Ethics: an experiential workshop connecting body and
mind in ethics consultation practice
Chair: Andrea Frolic

WS-6 Moving Ethics: an experiential workshop connecting body and
mind in ethics consultation practice
Victoria Slager (Victoria Slager Choreography, Ancaster, Canada)

18:00 – 22:30 Rosarium Conference Dinner

Saturday, May 21
08:00 – 09:30 Coffee & tea Poster area
09:30 – 11:00 Parallel Session VII
Moral theory and moral expertise in CES III Auditorium OP-100-102
Training and education of clinical ethics professionals VII 01A05 OP-103-104
Formats and structures of clinical ethics services (CES) V 02A06 OP-106-108
Single Case Discussions III 04A04 OP-109-111
& policy V 04A05
Cheap and Fair and use of restraint 12A05 OP-115-117
Difficulties, ambivalences and experiences in the practice of PS-9
clinical ethics consultation 08A00
Training health care professionals as facilitators of moral case WS-7
deliberation: learning by doing BV-0H19
11:30 – 12:45 Plenary closing session: debate on ethics in practice with Stakeholders Aula
12:45 – 13:00 Closing remarks Aula
13:00 – 14:00 Poster dismantling Poster area

Saturday , May 21

desk

08:00 – 09:30 Poster area Coffee & tea

PARALLEL SESSION VII

09:30 – 11:00 Auditorium Moral theory and moral expertise in CES III
Chair:

OP-100 Narrative and hermeneutical approaches to clinical ethics
support services
Rouven Christian Porz (University Hospital Berne, Berne, Switzerland)

OP-101 Macro ethics and moral deliberation on the ward. Development of
a normative framework for reproductive centres in the
Netherlands.
Norbert Steinkamp (Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center,
Nijmegen, The Netherlands)

OP-102 Ethics is Moving – As Long as Being Lost Isn’t So Bad
Melinda Ann McGarrah Sharp (Phillips Theological Seminary, Tulsa,

09:30 – 11:00 01A05 Training and education of clinical ethics professionals VII
Chair:

OP-103 An Innovative and Interactive Bioethics Consultation Curriculum
from the Montefiore-Einstein Center for Bioethics
Hannah Lipman (Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, United States of
America)

OP-104 Consent in Medical Practice: Gap between Theory and Practice
Vina Vaswani (Yenepoya University, Mangalore, India)

09:30 – 11:00 02A06 Formats and structures of clinical ethics services (CES) V
Chair:

OP-106 Building and sustaining a clinical ethics service (CES):
challenges and successes
Marie-Eve Bouthillier (CSSSS de Laval, Laval, Canada)

OP-107 Challenges and Accomplishments in Delivery of Clinical Ethics
Service: Perspective from the North-western Ontario
Julija Kelecevic (Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Canada)

OP-108 Medical Ethics Committees in Patients’ Rights Act: Ethics, Law
and Reality
Naama Wietchner (International Center for Health Law and Ethics, Zur
Yigal, Israël)

09:30 – 11:00 04A04 Single Case Discussions III
Chair:

OP-109 Responsibility and the Urge to Follow-Up: An Example of Moral
Complexity in Clinical Ethics Practice
Stuart Finder (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, United
States of America)

OP-110 The Utrecht Method – an ethical case deliberation model
Carla Kessler (Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands)

OP-111 Never again: One patient’s experience in completing a
psychiatric advance directive

competence & policy V
Chair:

OP-112 An Ethics Strategic Plan (saves us from going madly off in all
directions)
Rick Singleton (Eastern Health, St. John’s Newfoundland & Labrador,
Canada)

OP-113 Preserving Human Dignity during Treatment of Handcuffed
Prisoners
Dorit Rubinstein (Michal Peiser Zefat Academic College, Yehud,
Israel)

OP-114 Case Features and Systemic Pressures Impacting Incapacitated
Patients Alone at a Safety Net Hospital
Eric Isaacs (University of California, San Francisco, United States of
America)

09:30 – 11:00 12A05 Cheap and Fair and use of restraint
Chair:

OP-115 Is it possible to make cheap services fair?
Allerdiena Hubbeling (South-West London and St. George’s NHS
Trust, London, United Kingdom)

OP-116 End of Life Issues and the Brazilian Medicine
Leo Pessini (Saint Camillus University, Sao Paulo, Brazil)

OP-117 Soft restraint or hard alternative? The ethics of technological
alternatives to restraints in residential care for people with
dementia or intellectual disabilities: a research project
Brenda Frederiks (VU university medical center, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands)

09:30 – 11:00 08A00 Difficulties, ambivalences and experiences in the practice of
clinical ethics consultation
Chair: Eva Winkler

PS-9.1 Pitfalls in clinical ethics consultation (CEC): conflicts of duty and
interest
Margarete Pfaefflin (Epilepsy-Center Bethel, Bielefeld, Germany)

PS-9.2 Success factors and problems in getting an ethics consultation
up and running
Eva Winkler (University Hospital of the Ludwig Maximilian University
Munich, Munich, Germany)

PS-9.3 Living with the result of an ethics consultation – the Ethics
consultant’s influence on outcome and process
Stella Reiter-Theil (Medical Faculty, Basel, Switzerland)

09:30 – 11:00 BV-0H19 Training health care professionals as facilitators of moral case
deliberation: learning by doing
Chair: Margreeth Stolper

WS-7 Training health care professionals as facilitators of moral case
deliberation: learning by doing
Margreet Stolper (VU university medical center, Amsterdam, The
Netherlands)


11:30 – 12:45 Aula Plenary closing session: debate on ethics in practice with
Stakeholders

What American ethics consultants are talking about...and NOT
talking about

Ideas regarding future needs of clinical ethics support
Ana Borovečkim (University of Zagreb, School of Medicine
“Andrija Štampar” School of Public Health, Zagreb, Croatia)

Evaluation of clinical ethics support services: normative and
empirical challenges
Jan Schildmann (Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany)

Capacity Building in Clinical Ethics Consultation
Karim Syahirah (Research Assiociate Center for Biomedical Ethics
National University of Singapore, Singapore, Republic of Singapore)

12:45 – 13:00 Aula Closing remarks

13:00 – 14:00 Poster area Poster dismantling

Pp 13 johali presentation in program iccec aangepast 4

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Destaque

Destaque (14)

Semelhante a Pp 13 johali presentation in program iccec aangepast 4

Semelhante a Pp 13 johali presentation in program iccec aangepast 4 (20)

Último

Último (20)

Pp 13 johali presentation in program iccec aangepast 4