SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 37
Baixar para ler offline
CambridgeIP


Graphene: Cambridge
Network business lecture


Wednesday 14th March 2012

 Quentin Tannock (Chairman, CambridgeIP)




 1                                         ©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
Graphene patenting trends

• An increasingly crowded patent landscape around graphene.
• From around 2007 we observe a ‘spike’ in the number of patent
  applications both from corporations and academic institutions.
• Tannock, Q. Exploiting carbon flatland, Nature Materials, Vol 11, 2-5, (2012)


                                             Number of patents: Annual and cumulative
                                                    University/Research Insitituions   SMEs   Multinational    Other
                     900

                     800

                     700
  Patents - yearly




                     600

                     500

                     400

                     300

                     200

                     100

                       0
                           Pre-2001   2001   2002        2003      2004       2005     2006   2007      2008     2009   2010    2011

                                                                                                                               © 2012



                             Patent numbers in the past two years may be under-represented. Patent applications may remain
                                                                                          unpublished for up to 18 months.
Universities in the graphene patent landscape
• Across all years, there is a relatively high patent contribution from universities and
  research institutes consistent with other relatively early-stage and research-
  intensive technology spaces.
Table 1: Most active inventors with university affiliations or collaborations. Source Tannock, Q. Exploiting
  carbon flatland, Nature Materials, Vol 11, 2-5, (2012)
 Nr Name            Nr of   Organisational affiliations in inventor's Example patent Example patent title
                    patents Graphene patents                          number
       Jae-young            Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Samsung,
  1                   62                                                     US20110127497A1       Organic Light Emitting Device Using Graphene
       Choi                 Sungkyunkwan University
                                                                                                   Method For Exfoliating Carbonization Catalyst From
                                                                                                   Graphene Sheet, Method For Transferring Graphene
       Hyeon-jin
  2                   43    Samsung, Sungkyunkwan University                     US20090308520A1   Sheet From Which Carbonization Catalyst Is Exfoliated
       Shin
                                                                                                   To Device, Graphene Sheet And Device Using The
                                                                                                   Graphene Sheet
       Seon-mi                                                                                     Transparent Electrode Comprising Graphene Sheet,
  3                   39    Samsung, Sungkyunkwan University                     US20090071533A1
       Yoon                                                                                        And Display And Solar Cell Including The Electrode
       Ilhan A.             Battelle Memorial Institute, Princeton University,                     Functional graphene-polymer nanocomposites for gas
  4                   35                                                         US20100096595A1
       Aksay                Vorbeck Materials Corporation                                          barrier applications
       Hyun-jong            Samsung, Seoul National University,                                    Graphene device and method of manufacturing the
  5                   34                                                         US20110089995A1
       Chung                Sungkyunkwan University                                                same
                            Samsung, Seoul National University,
                                                                                                   Methods Of Manufacturing And Transferring Larger
  6    Sun-ae Seo     33    Sungkyunkwan University, The Leland Stanford         US20110108521A1
                                                                                                   Sized Graphene
                            Junior University
                                                                                                   Graphene Roll To Roll Coating Apparatus And
       Byung Hee
  7                   28    Samsung, Sungkyunkwan University                     US20110195207     Graphene Roll To Roll Coating Method Using The
       Hong
                                                                                                   Same for Graphene
       Yun-sung             Samsung, Seoul National University,
  8                   21                                                         US20110108609     Methods Of Fabricating Graphene Using Alloy Catalyst
       Woo                  Sungkyunkwan University
       Robert K
                            Princeton University, Vorbeck Materials
  8    Prudhomm       21                                                         US20110042813A1   Printed Electronics
                            Corporation
       e
       Rodney S.            Graphene Energy Inc., Northwestern University,
  9                   20                                                         WO2008143829A2    Graphene Oxide Sheet Laminate and Method
       Ruoff                Texas Instruments Inc., University of Texas
       James M.                                                                                    Graphene Compositions and Drilling Fluids Derived
  9                   20    University of Texas, William Marsh Rice University   US20110059871
       Tour                                                                                        Therefrom
       John S.              Princeton University, Vorbeck Materials                                Coatings Containing Functionalized Graphene Sheets
  10                  18                                                         US20110049437
       Lettow               Corporation                                                            and Articles Coated Therewith
Graphene: Selected technology examples
           Year              Author, Title, Journal                  Representative
                                                                         image
                  Novoselov et al. "Electric Field Effect in
           2004
                  Atomically Thin Carbon Films" , Science
                  306, 666-669


           2006   Berger et al. "Electronic Confinement and
                  Coherence in Patterned Epitaxial
                  Graphene", Science 312, 1191-1196                                          Table 2:
                                                                                             Graphene –
           2007   Dikin et al. " Preparation and                                             Selected
                  characterization of graphene oxide paper",
                  Nature 448, 457-460                                                        Journal articles
                                                                                             2000 to 2011.
           2009   Li et al. " Large-Area Synthesis of High-                                   Source: Tannock, Q.
                  Quality and Uniform Graphene Films on                                        Exploiting carbon
                  Copper Foils", Science 324, 1312-1314                                         flatland, Nature
                                                                                              Materials, Vol 11, 2-5,
                                                                                                      (2012)
           2010   Bae et al. " Roll-to-roll production of 30-inch
                  graphene films for transparent electrodes",
                  Nature Nanotechnology 5, 574–578


           2010   Liao et al. " High-speed graphene
                  transistors with a self-aligned nanowire
                  gate", Nature 467, 305–308


 4                                                            ©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
Example Patent 1: Andrea Ferrari
US20110269629A1
SUPERCONDUCTING MATERIALS
Assignee: ISIS INNOVATION [GB]
Inventor: GIUSTINO FELICIANO [GB]; FERRARI ANDREA C [GB]; SAVINI GIANLUCA [GB]
Publication Date: 2011-11-03

Abstract: Partially or fully saturated doped graphene materials are found to be superconducting. The saturation is with hydrogen
or halogen. Doping is performed by substitution of carbon atoms or by applying an electric field. Diamond nano-rods are also
found to be superconducting. These materials can be used in electronic devices having a gate.
Example Patent 2: Nokia Research Cambridge
WO2012013854A1
A GRAPHENE - TITANIUM DIOXIDE ELECTRODE
Assignee: NOKIA CORP [FI]
Inventor: WEI DI [GB]; BOWER CHRIS [GB]; RYHAENEN TEUVO TAPANI [GB]; ANDREW PIERS [GB]
Publication Date: 2012-02-02

Abstract: An electrode comprises graphene, titanium dioxide and a binder, the binder configured to facilitate the binding
together of the graphene and titanium dioxide to form the electrode.
Corporations in the graphene patent landscape

• The largest corporate patent portfolios in the graphene patent landscape are held
  by Samsung and Sandisk, reflecting industrial interests in semiconductor and
  memory-related applications.
• Key differences in corporate research and development (R&D) focus and
  commercial strategies can be inferred from corporate patent filings.



                                                                     Samsung’s graphene
                                                                       patent network
                                                                   • Over 120 named
                                                                   inventors
                                                                   • University collaborators
                                                                   include: Hanyang,
                                                                   Kumoh, Liebig, Stanford,
                                                                   Seoul, Sungkyunkwan.
                                                                     Source: Tannock, Q. et al
                                                                    Patenting flatland: Graphene
                                                                      Exploitation challenges,
                                                                       CambridgeIP ,(2012)
Geography of graphene patent filings 2007 and 2011

                      KR South   Central and
                        Korea      South                2007                                   Other                    2011
                         1%       America                                                       0%
               JP Japan             1%                                    JP Japan
                 15%                                                         5%          KR South
      CN China                                                  Russia                    Korea
                                      WIPO                                                               WIPO
        1%                                                     and USSR                    8%
                                      17%                                                                24%
                                                                  0%
 European                                                       EAPO/EA
Patents (EPO                                                    Eurasian      CN China
 & National)                                                     Patent         11%
     8%                                                        Organization
 CA Canada                                                         0%
    1%                                                          European
                                                               Patents (EPO
                                                                & National)
                                                US PTO              8%      CA                                     US PTO
                                                 55%                     Canada                                     42%
                                                                            1%

                                                                                                                        © 2011
                                               © 2011




     Graphene patent landscape: Asia rising
     • Massive increase in patent filings in Asia
     • Much of the increase in patent filings in South Korea can be attributed to Samsung’s graphene patent
       activity. The increase in Chinese patent filings is more difficult to account for. Many Chinese patents
       were filed in 2011 and full details are not yet in the public domain.


        8
                                                                 © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
Nanomaterials: Complex and evolving value chain
‘nano’ is a cross-cutting horizontal, not a vertical ‘industry’
            R&D: Inventions &
        Discoveries, basic and
                       applied                         Mixtures: Emulsions,
                                                      coatings, composites,
                                                                                                                            $$$
                Raw materials: e.g. CNT,                                              Products: Sports equipment,
                          quantum dots                          components                         seals, drill bits
                                                                                                                                  $$$
                      Manufacture                       Integration                          Distribution                   $$$
                                                                                                                                  $$$
                         Nanomaterials sub-spaces
                                                                                                                          $$$

                                                    Services, Facilities, Equipment


•       Cross-cutting horizantal not a vertically integrated industry
    •     End-markets and applications are likely to remain very diverse – hence no single group of dominant players
    •     Evolving and disaggregated value chains – its not a vertical, but a horizontal with diverse end-markets and applications
    •     The value chain is surrounded by key service providers, facility providers, equipment providers and other supporters

•       Patents protect every stage in the value chain – these can support and block new entrants in
        specific stages and around specific application areas
                   Tannock, Q. Nanomaterials trends: Evidence from science literature, Nanomaterials 2011 (2011)
                                                                           © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
Take the survey: IP issues facing the nanotech community

  • Our nanotech survey aims to identify the key intellectual
    property issues facing the nanotechnology community
    today. There is an option to receive a summary of survey
    results.
  • Take the survey:
    www.cambridgeip.com/index.php/knowledge-
    centre/nanotech-survey
Contact Details


      Quentin Tannock                       Ilian Iliev
      (Chairman and Co-founder)             (CEO and Co-founder)
      E: quentin.tannock@cambridgeip.com    E: ilian.iliev@cambridgeip.com
      M: +44 (0) 778 621 0305               M: +44 (0) 778 637 3965
      T: +44 (0)1223 778 846                T: +44 (0)1223 778 846


      Corporate office                      Internet resources
                                            Website:       www.cambridgeip.com
      Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd                  www.boliven.com
      8a Kings Parade, Cambridge            Blog:          www.cambridgeip.com/blog
      CB2 1SJ, United Kingdom
      UK: +44 (0) 1223 777 846              Sign up for our free newsletter
      Fax: +44 (0) 20 3357 3105             on our home page




 11                                                 ©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
Why graphene?

    Graphene: A fast developing research-enabled
    technology space, encompassing a very extensive
    set of potential markets and applications.
    •     Graphene is the first 2D crystal discovered, with unusual electronic, optical
          and mechanical properties.
    •     Graphene is of interest across industry fields as diverse as semiconductors
          and biotechnology.
    •     Many graphene technology applications are in sectors which are notoriously
          patent and litigation intensive


        Examples of graphene applications include:
        • Faster computers: More efficient transistors based on graphene could result
          in thinner computer chips which use less energy and work faster.
        • More sensitive and robust sensors: Biotech sensor devices, environmental
          monitoring, oil & gas sensors
        • Thinner and flexible displays: Flexible and transparent electronics
        • Tougher and more conductive polymer composites: Much like multi-wall
          nanotubes (MWNT), graphene polymer composites can make polymers and
          other products, like natural rubber, stronger and electrically conductive.
Patenting flatland: Graphene - Overview

 • Our report ‘Patenting flatland: Graphene – Exploitation
   challenges’ builds on research and analysis around
   university graphene patent activity, recently presented
   in Nature Materials: Tannock, Q. Exploiting carbon
   flatland, Nature Materials, Vol 11, 2-5, (2012)
  • CambridgeIP research for Nature Materials around the graphene patent
    activity and collaborations of universities has been updated and
    extended to analyse the entire graphene patent landscape and focus
    additionally on the activities of major corporations and leading SMEs.
    In addition the report considers the impact of leaders in the publication
    of non-patent literature on the patent landscape
  • The report is 70 pages long and contains 45 tables and figures
                                                                                Corporate/University R&D network

 • Our dataset ‘Graphene patents’ is an expert verified
   dataset of all graphene patents and patent applications
   globally recovered in our research – more than 2,000. All
   key patent information fields and all major jurisdictions are
   covered.


                                                                                         Patent trends over time
Technology Profile Reports: Overview

                            • CambridgeIP brings its significant experience in building
                              patent-based technology intelligence with leading
Patent trends over time
                              technologists and investors to create Technology Profile
                              Reports.
                            • CambridgeIP’s patent-based approach provides a
                              different perspective to understanding investment in
Patents are inter-related
                              R&D, geographical distribution and size of markets,
                              market value chains, how a technology area is evolving
                              and what are the fundamental drivers of its long-term
                              performance.
                            • Our analysis helps readers identify and assess those
                              technologies where commercial value is concentrated.
 Corporate/University         Patents cost money and significant organisational
       R&D networks
                              resources to secure and maintain. Patents can provide
                              a useful indication of those technologies that patent
                              holders are prepared to spend money to protect.
Patenting flatland: Graphene – In our report

• Graphene: Key enablers and barriers
• Most important graphene patents
  • Top cited patents
  • Largest patent families
• Graphene manufacturing techniques
• Timeline highlighting key events in the graphene
  patent landscape
• Geographical analysis of patent activity
• Technology component analysis of patent portfolios
• Patent activity and company profiles of leading small and medium sized
  enterprises (SMEs) in the graphene space
• Identification of leading major corporations in graphene by number of
  patents filed, with example patents
• What to watch for in the graphene patent landscape
• Conclusions and recommendations for investors, researchers and
  policymakers
Patenting flatland: Graphene – Table of Contents
                                       Table of Contents
                                       About CambridgeIP and Technology Profile Reports .......................................................................................................... 0
                                           Other CambridgeIP Reports .......................................................................................................................................... 1
                                           Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................................... 1
                                       Patent-based Intelligence ................................................................................................................................................... 2
                                       Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................... 5
                                       Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................................... 7
                                       Why Graphene? ................................................................................................................................................................. 9
                                       Graphene History and Context ......................................................................................................................................... 12
                                           Graphene, a Nanomaterial .......................................................................................................................................... 13
                                       Graphene Technology ...................................................................................................................................................... 15
                                       Patents in the Graphene flatland ...................................................................................................................................... 18
                                           Who owns the graphene flatland? ............................................................................................................................... 22
                                           Universities and Research Institutes ............................................................................................................................ 26
                                           Sungkyunkwan University............................................................................................................................................ 30
                                           Rice University ............................................................................................................................................................ 31
                                           Manchester University ................................................................................................................................................. 32
                                           Multinational corporations ............................................................................................................................................ 34
                                           Samsung’s graphene patent network........................................................................................................................... 36
                                           Sandisk 3D’s graphene patent network ....................................................................................................................... 38
                                           SMEs .......................................................................................................................................................................... 38
                                           Company profile: Vorbeck Materials Corp.................................................................................................................... 40
                                           Company Profile: Nanotek Instruments Inc. ................................................................................................................. 41
                                           Company Profile: Graphene Industries ........................................................................................................................ 42
                                           Collaborations and licensing relationships ................................................................................................................... 43
                                           Key inventors .............................................................................................................................................................. 43
                                           Geography of patent filings: Graphene ........................................................................................................................ 44
                                           Most frequently cited US patents ................................................................................................................................. 45
                                           Patent families ............................................................................................................................................................. 46
                                           Patent portfolio composition by technologies ............................................................................................................... 48
                                           Most recently filed patents ........................................................................................................................................... 49
                                           Patent trend conclusions ............................................................................................................................................. 52
                                       Recommendations and Conclusions ................................................................................................................................ 53
                                           Key developments to watch for .................................................................................................................................... 55
                                       About CambridgeIP .......................................................................................................................................................... 56
                                           CambridgeIP Executives ............................................................................................................................................. 57
                                           CambridgeIP Products and Services ........................................................................................................................... 58
                                       Appendix 1: Additional analysis of the graphene patent landscape ................................................................................... 59
                                       Appendix 2: Methodology & Detailed Patent Information .................................................................................................. 63
                                           Methodology................................................................................................................................................................ 63
                                           Patent family explanation and context ......................................................................................................................... 65
                                           Patent IPC Codes........................................................................................................................................................ 66
                                       Disclaimer and Registered Company Information ............................................................................................................. 68




                                To read a report overview & table of contents in more details please visit us at
                                 http://www.boliven.com/boliven_landscapes/patenting_flatland_graphene
Patenting flatland: Graphene – Access

Access the full report and full dataset here:
• http://www.boliven.com/boliven_landscapes/
  patenting_flatland_graphene
Appendix Outline

• Appendix: CambridgeIP background & contacts
  • Nanotech Case Studies: Examples of past work
  • CambridgeIP snapshot
  • CambridgeIP experience
  • CambridgeIP team
  • Contacts




  18
                            © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
CS 1: Rapid mapping of large nanotech spaces - UK
nanotechnology patent audit
    Client profile
    Senior executives from a publically funded organisation approached CambridgeIP for assistance in mapping a broad section of the UK
    nanotechnology space

    Business situation
•   A key driver was the need to inform our clients’ strategy in this complex and patent intensive space
• Our remit was to assist client executives develop a clear understanding of the existing landscape, identify areas of relative strength &
  weakness and existing R&D collaborations, analyse trends and provide statistical information & benchmarking data for use in business
  planning and stakeholder reports

    Our approach

• Working with CambridgeIP and senior industry experts we developed and implemented a complex patent search strategy
• Results were analysed using our proprietary tools and methods and a focus area for deep analysis was identified
• A workshop was conducted for client executives with our internal experts, assisting interpretation and dissemination of findings


    Results and benefits




• Identification of fundamental technologies and key actors
                                                                                 • Insights into corporate R&D collaborations - identiifying key players in the
• Identification of areas of strength together with technologies applicable to     patent space, together with their overlapping relationships
  multiple sectors of application for future focus by our client
                                                                                 • Independent and fact-based assessments of the client organisations impact
• Understanding of recent M&A activity with significant impacts on the             on UK IP assets, valuable in stakeholder reporting
  ownership of the UK’s nanotechnology IP assets
        19
                                                                                            © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
CS 2: University spin-off, competitor strategy analysis
using patent-based Intelligence
  Client profile
   A top UK University spin-out approached us for an IP Landscape report.

  Business situation

 • The client was backed by a major UK government funding organisation.
 • The CEO of the company required deep intelligence about industry incumbents’ R&D strategy.
 • The client also needed independent analysis of the industry’s patent landscape for use in technology licensing negotiations and
   structuring a strategic partnership.
   Our approach                                                                      Results and benefits

 • Working with the client’s senior technical and business                        • The resulting patent-based intelligence was used in
   representatives we defined the client’s technology and market                    negotiations by our client.
   spaces                                                                         • The client felt that the findings on competitors’ patenting
 • We identified two technology focus areas of critical                             activity helped secure a go-ahead for a joint venture with a
   importance to the client’s technology with the client and                        major industry player: “The strategic partner’s reaction to the
   performed an IP Landscape report these two areas                                 report’s findings was startling: immediately inviting us to their
                                                                                    HQ to meet with their Head of Development to finalize an
                                                                                    agreement towards jointly developing a product.”
                                                                                  • The report has also been used by the client when applying for
                                                                                    participation Framework 7 programs, by demonstrating the
                                                                                    client’s deep knowledge of the industry’s patenting trends.
 Competitor Analysis of Technology Focus in Client's Field
  Assignee   Rank by # of      Total #       Year of    Total Patents    Portfolio     5 Year
   Name       Patents in     Patents in    entry into    in Overall     Proportion   Growth of     The example shows how patent data can be
             Client Tech.   Client Tech.    the field     Industry       of Tech.     in Focus     used to analyse the R&D strategy of
                Space          Space                                      Space         Field
                                                                                                   competitors, and to develop licensing strategy.
 Company 1       1              37           1993          6,576          1.6%        48.6%        The findings suggest that Company 7 is
 Company 2       2              25           1998            33          100.0%       56.0%        aggressively expanding into the client’s field: it
 Company 3       3              19           1997          2,007          7.1%        15.8%
                                                                                                   has the highest growth rate of patenting
 Company 4       4              16           1992          1,646          2.1%        62.5%
                                                                                                   activity. In turn Company 2 is most dependent
 Company 5       5              14           1999           840           7.2%        92.9%
 Company 6       6              11           1995          8,838          4.1%        63.6%
                                                                                                   on this field for its strategic success: 100% of
 Company 7       15             6            2003           400           1.8%        100.0%       its patents are in the field of focus.

                                                                                           © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
CS 3: IP Landscape® - nano-sensor devices
 Client profile
  A medium sized VC funded company delivering nano-enabled sensing solutions to the defense and homeland security sectors approached
  CambridgeIP for assistance updating their IP portfolio and developing an up-to-date patent landscape

 Business situation
 • Sophisticated and well-advised client with good understanding of its IP space and competitors, holding a relatively large patent portfolio.
 • Key drivers were to improve understanding of adjacent IP spaces, increase efficiency and structure in IP intelligence gathering activities,
   inform investor communications
  Our approach
 • We audited the client’s patent holdings, developing indexed and cross-referenced patent databases; We defined the client’s space and
   identified adjacent spaces, undertaking IP Landscape and benchmarking analysis against the client’s existing portfolio. Business
   intelligence and key statistics were extracted using the RedEyeTM suite of tools.
 Results and benefits
                                                                          • Identified technology migration opportunities & threats from
                                                                            adjacent technology spaces
                                                                          • Demonstrated client’s dominance of aspects of its IP Landscape
                                                                          • The client used our independent findings and analysis in
                                                                            presentations to VC investors, as part of a successful Series C
                                                                            funding round.




 • Identified existing, known, players and new entrants to the client’s
   core IP space – including newly active academic institutes and
   corporations
 • Improved organisation of the client’s existing portfolio, laying a
   foundation for future portfolio management
 • Identified portfolio gaps for our client to plug and areas for
   consideration in future patent filings

       21
                                                                                   © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
CS 4: Accelerate licensing strategy development –
early stage surgical materials technology
  Client profile
   A leading UK University asked us to help identify market opportunities for an early stage surgical materials development


   Business situation

 • Previous market research had not resulted in uptake of the technology by corporate prospects
 • A go / stop decision point was imminent as international PCT roll-out of an initial patent application approached

   Our approach                                                            Results and benefits

                                                                       • 20+ organisations were identified, were categorised by type and
                                                                         arranged in order of priority for approach by our client
                                                                       • Marketing objectives and recommendations were made in relation to
                                                                         each organisation type
                                                                       • Key geographical markets containing high profile licensing prospects
                                                                         were identified for addition to PCT designated states lists
                                                                       • Information on similar approaches, including diagrams, were provided
 • We defined the technology space and implemented a multi-layer         to client academic experts in a convenient format
   search strategy that aimed at identifying
         • licensing candidates
         • potential collaboration partners
         • key markets & applications
         • critical geographical areas
         • Information useful to marketing the technology
 • Results and recommendations were presented to the client in a
   PowerPoint summary report, and cross-referenced Excel dataset
 • A workshop with the client's TTO representatives and client’s
   academic experts aids understanding and dissemination of results
   and recommendations


       22
                                                                                  © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
Appendix Outline

• Appendix: CambridgeIP background & contacts
  • Nanotech Case Studies: Examples of past work
  • CambridgeIP snapshot
  • CambridgeIP experience
  • CambridgeIP team
  • Contacts




  23
                            © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
Our offerings
IP Landscape®             Open innovation          Technology               Technology
                                                   mapping                  market survey

Expert built patent       Identify technology      Pinpoint emerging        Identify market –        Knowledge transfer
datasets focused on       ownership in complex     technology patterns      technology niches in     portal
your technology           spaces                   & hotspots               rapidly developing       Access over 100
                                                                            markets                  million scientific
Identify prior art in a   Shortlist acquisition    Understand                                        documents, including
technology space          opportunities            technology value         Inform in-house R&D      the latest patents
                                                   chains                   strategy
Uncover inventor &        Identify overlaps with                                                     Conduct technology
collaborator networks     your own technology      Identify technology      Influence public         literature searches
                          portfolio                market &                 sector innovation
Clarify strengths &                                commercialisation        support strategies       Perform high-level
weaknesses of patent      Conduct due              scenarios                                         analytics on patent
portfolios                diligence on external                                                      data
                          partners                 Locate prospective       Prioritise key market
Confirm freedom to                                 partners, acquisitions   segments and identify    Collaborative patent
operate & technology      Identify open            and clients              strategic partners &     landscaping with
white space analyses      innovation                                        collaboration            your colleagues
                          opportunities in your    Information on           opportunities
Support investment        own and others’ IP       partner/acquisition                               Boliven Landscapes
due diligence and         portfolios               candidates operating     Identify in what areas   Access valuable
preparation for fund                               in your area of          you need to build an     patent datasets
raising                   CxO compatible           interest                 IP Landscape             combined with
                          materials, workshops                                                       industry expert
Understand market         and seminars                                                               analyses
trends

      24
CambridgeIP’s technology and knowledge platforms

 CambridgeIP’s offerings are based on a combination of:
 •   Proprietary software and workflow platforms tested through more than 140 real life projects
 •   A 100 million document database of patent and non-patent literature
 •   Quality assurance and report standards that ensure consistency in the outputs for our clients
 •   The Boliven.com online platform of technology literature search and analytics with 8,000+
     registered users and 30,000+ unique visitors per month


                                                             RedEye: our software analytics and workflow platform
Boliven.com: a leading portal for R&D and IP professionals




      25
                                                                  © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
Appendix Outline

• Appendix: CambridgeIP background & contacts
  • Nanotech Case Studies: Examples of past work
  • CambridgeIP snapshot
  • CambridgeIP experience
  • CambridgeIP team
  • Contacts




  26
                            © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
Our clients

We have delivered more than 100 projects with leading
organisations: including major corporations, research institutes,
service providers, high-tech SMEs and investors

 Selected clients:

               … and
               other
               leading big
               pharma




   27
                                             © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
Thought leadership

 Selected publications:
CambridgeIP is a recognised thought leader in the technology intelligence
space. Our research has been covered by the Harvard Business Review,
Financial Times, Nature Publishing Group and other leading media. Our
collaborations include Chatham House, University of Sussex and Cambridge
University’s Judge Business School.




28         ©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
Health and life sciences
     Medical devices                               Pharmaceutical         OTC drugs
     Auto-injectors                                formulations           Analgesics
     Inhalers                                      Excipients             Anti-microbial
     Endoscopy                                     Carriers               Anti- fungal
     Ultrasound                                    Liposomes
     Wound healing                                 Propellants            Vaccines
     e-Health                                      Nanoparticles          Dendritic cell
                                                   Capsules               Recombinant vector T-
     Diagnostics                                                          cell receptor peptide
     Telehealth                                                           vaccines
                                                   Manufacturing          DNA vaccination
     Blood glucose
     Heart rate                                    processes
     Blood pressure                                Spray drying           Gene therapy
     Biomarkers                                    Freeze drying          Silencing
                                                   Jet milling            Tissue targeting
                                                   Filling
     Active                                        Packaging
     pharmaceutical                                                       Regenerative
     ingredients                                   Generics               medicine
     Biopharmaceuticals                                                   Cell therapy
                                                   Bio-similars
     Tissue targeting                                                     iPSC
                                                   Re-formulation
     Drug conjugation                                                     Tissue engineering
                                                   Patents expiries
     New chemical entities                                                Cell-based vaccines



29       ©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
Clean tech and energy
     Wind energy                                 Fuel cells              Nano devices
     systems                                                             & materials



     Biomass                                     Advanced                Geothermal
                                                 refrigeration           energy
                                                                         Systems

     Photovoltaic &                              Clean coal
                                                                         Refineries,
     component                                   carbon capture
                                                                         power gen,
     technologies                                CO2-EOR
                                                                         co-gen.

     Concentrated                                Marine                  Desalination
     solar & other                               transport               and water
     energy storage                                                      sanitation
     systems
                                                 Smart grid


30      ©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
Telecommunications and electronics
        Wireless authentication                                            Geographical systems
        Physical/Remote access control                                     GIS measurements
        Merchant/Purchasing                                                Satellite navigation/GPS
        Digital credentials

        Clean tech                                                         Telecoms standards
        Smart grid                                                         ETSI
        Smart meters                                                       Continua alliance
        Transport management                                               RFID
        Distributed sensor systems                                         Blue tooth
        Energy harvesting                                                  Near field communication
                                                                           Radio frequency identification
        Internet & data handling
        Search                                                             Hardware
        Cloud computing                                                    Card readers
        Data fusion                                                        Routers
        Database replication                                               Mems
                                                                           Flexible displays
                                                                           Contactless card
        Mobile devices/applications
                                                                           Satellite communications
        E-reader
        Mobile search
        Application software                                               e-Health
        Media convergence                                                  Remote diagnostics
        3G/4G/WiFi                                                         Device access control
  31      ©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
Nanotechnology
         Nanomaterials                                                    Tissue engineering
         CNT                                                              Nano-materials
         Graphene                                                         Nano-fibers
         Nanoparticles                                                    Scaffolds


         Nanobiotechnology                                                Nanoparticles
         Bio-compatible nanoparticles                                     Colloidal gold
         DNA nanotechnology                                               Iron nanoparticles
         Nanospheres                                                      Nanostructures
         Nanoformulations                                                 Platinum nanoparticles
                                                                          Quantum dots
                                                                          Silver nanoparticles
         Carbon nanotubes
         CNT, SWNT, DWNT, MWNT
         Functionalization                                                Industrial fields
         Production                                                       Advanced materials
         Purification                                                     Automotive, Aerospace
                                                                          Electronics
                                                                          Paints & Coatings
         Nanotoxicity
         Nanotubes
         Nanospheres
                                                                          Environmental
         Nanoparticles                                                    applications
         Risk assessment technologies                                     Construction materials
                                                                          Energy storage, generation and
                                                                          transmission
32       ©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
                                                                          Water purification
Appendix Outline

• Appendix: CambridgeIP background & contacts
  • Nanotech Case Studies: Examples of past work
  • CambridgeIP snapshot
  • CambridgeIP experience
  • CambridgeIP team
  • Contacts




  33
                            © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
Selected team members




  Quentin Tannock        Ilian Iliev     Dr Robert Brady             Mark Meyer             Ralph Poole        Vladimir Yossifov
Chairman & co-founder CEO & co-founder   Non-Exec Director      Business Development          Boston         Geneva Representative
                                                                      Manager              Representative
                                                                    North America




                     Arthur Lallement    Helena van der Merwe       Sarah Helm           Yanjun Zhao
                     Senior Associate      Senior Associate       Senior Associate      Senior Associate




       34
                                                                          © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
Key team members 1
         Quentin Tannock (Chairman & co-founder)
          Quentin leads our work in Nanotechnology, Materials, Health and Investment strategy. He has
           managed IP Landscape, IP Strategy and M&A and investment strategy projects for multinational
           corporations, investment groups and leading universities. His IP strategy related work has been
           covered in Bloomberg, Nature Publishing Group, The Wall Street Journal and elsewhere.
          Prior experience: founder of a successful company in the chemical sector; law lecturer; facilitated
           major R&D collaborations at Cambridge University (Electronics, Photonics & Nanotechnology);
           member of Lambert working group tasked by government to draft model contracts for industry-
           university collaborations; IP analysis & strategic advice to nanotechnology venture capitalists;
           assisting Cambridge University Institute of Biotechnology start-ups (bio-nano diagnostic devices)
           with commercial and fundraising strategies
          Education: Law, (Roman-Dutch, Common Law, International Law in Cambridge & elsewhere)

         Ilian Iliev (CEO & co-founder)
          Ilian leads our work in Energy & CleanTech and Telecoms areas. Ilian has published widely and
             has lead IP Landscape and IP Strategy projects for the full range of participants in high-
             technology sectors. He has assisted multi-national corporations and SMEs with their industrial
             partnering and fund-raising strategies.
          Prior experience: strategy & innovation advisory work for a Magic Circle law firm; award-winning
             biotech start-up in Cambridge; policy advice; 1990s: founded and ran a 100+ employee business
             in the electrical industry in Southern Africa
          Education: Economics and Management; Ccmpleting a PhD on ‘Innovation Finance’ at the Judge
             Business School, Cambridge University

       Dr Robert Brady (non-Exec. Director)
          Prior experience: Founder of Brady plc a leading supplier of transaction and risk management
           software solutions to companies and banks operating in the metals and minerals, energy and
           'soft' commodity sectors. Dr Brady acts as an active mentor and advisor for several growth
           companies, specializing in information technology and services. He is the current treasurer of
           Cambridge Angels investment group.
          Education: fellow at Trinity College, Cambridge, where he specialized in the field of physics.
  35
                                                               © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
Contact Details


      Quentin Tannock                       Ilian Iliev
      (Chairman and Co-founder)             (CEO and Co-founder)
      E: quentin.tannock@cambridgeip.com    E: ilian.iliev@cambridgeip.com
      M: +44 (0) 778 621 0305               M: +44 (0) 778 637 3965
      T: +44 (0)1223 778 846                T: +44 (0)1223 778 846


      Corporate office                      Internet resources
                                            Website:       www.cambridgeip.com
      Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd                  www.boliven.com
      8a Kings Parade, Cambridge            Blog:          www.cambridgeip.com/blog
      CB2 1SJ, United Kingdom
      UK: +44 (0) 1223 777 846              Sign up for our free newsletter
      Fax: +44 (0) 20 3357 3105             on our home page




 36                                                 ©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
Disclaimer

This document contains data extracted from publicly available sources and documents
   created by third parties, such as patent data obtained Patent Offices’ databases.
   CambridgeIP accepts no liability for the accuracy or completeness of the data
   provided to it from such sources.

The document may include analysis, together with opinions and observations
   expressed by CIP. They do not constitute legal advice. The Reader should not rely
   on them to make (or to refrain from making) any decision.

Any decision is the Reader’s sole responsibility and CambridgeIP hereby excludes any
   and all liability for any loss of any nature suffered by the Reader, or by any
   colleague, client or customer of the Reader, as a direct or indirect result of use of
   any of the Report or of the making any business decision, or refraining from making
   any such decision, based wholly or partly on any data, expression of opinion,
   statement or other information or data contained in the document.

For the avoidance of doubt it is recorded that CambridgeIP shall not be liable for any
   indirect, special, incidental, punitive, consequential losses or loss of profits. This
   limitation of liability shall not apply to injury or death to any person caused by CIP’s
   negligence (to which no limit applies).



 37                                                   ©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

2010_Nano Lett_P3HT-F8TBT PVs
2010_Nano Lett_P3HT-F8TBT PVs2010_Nano Lett_P3HT-F8TBT PVs
2010_Nano Lett_P3HT-F8TBT PVsXimin He
 
Utilizing CaCO 3 , CaF 2 , SiO 2 , and TiO 2 particles to enhance color hom...
Utilizing CaCO 3 , CaF 2 , SiO 2 , and TiO 2  particles  to enhance color hom...Utilizing CaCO 3 , CaF 2 , SiO 2 , and TiO 2  particles  to enhance color hom...
Utilizing CaCO 3 , CaF 2 , SiO 2 , and TiO 2 particles to enhance color hom...IJECEIAES
 
Natural Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (NDSSCs) From Opuntia Prickly Pear Dye Usi...
Natural Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (NDSSCs) From Opuntia Prickly Pear Dye Usi...Natural Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (NDSSCs) From Opuntia Prickly Pear Dye Usi...
Natural Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (NDSSCs) From Opuntia Prickly Pear Dye Usi...IJERA Editor
 
Atomization of reduced graphene oxide ultra thin film for transparent electro...
Atomization of reduced graphene oxide ultra thin film for transparent electro...Atomization of reduced graphene oxide ultra thin film for transparent electro...
Atomization of reduced graphene oxide ultra thin film for transparent electro...Conference Papers
 
Ravi shankar curriculam vitae
Ravi shankar  curriculam vitaeRavi shankar  curriculam vitae
Ravi shankar curriculam vitaeRavi Shankar
 
IRJET - Photoluminescence Study of Rare Earth Doped ZnO Nanoparticles
IRJET - Photoluminescence Study of Rare Earth Doped ZnO NanoparticlesIRJET - Photoluminescence Study of Rare Earth Doped ZnO Nanoparticles
IRJET - Photoluminescence Study of Rare Earth Doped ZnO NanoparticlesIRJET Journal
 
631332_2_merged_1423441293
631332_2_merged_1423441293631332_2_merged_1423441293
631332_2_merged_1423441293Maria Kuzmina
 
A review on graphene based light emitting functional devices
A review on graphene based light emitting functional devicesA review on graphene based light emitting functional devices
A review on graphene based light emitting functional devicesJournal Papers
 
Structure, Morphology & Infrared Spectroscopic Characterization of Ga (2x+2) ...
Structure, Morphology & Infrared Spectroscopic Characterization of Ga (2x+2) ...Structure, Morphology & Infrared Spectroscopic Characterization of Ga (2x+2) ...
Structure, Morphology & Infrared Spectroscopic Characterization of Ga (2x+2) ...IOSR Journals
 
The Graphene Council Graphene Characterization Survey
The Graphene Council Graphene Characterization SurveyThe Graphene Council Graphene Characterization Survey
The Graphene Council Graphene Characterization SurveyTerrance Barkan, CAE
 
SrBaSiO 4 :Eu 2+ phosphor: a novel application for improvingthe luminous flu...
SrBaSiO 4 :Eu 2+  phosphor: a novel application for improvingthe luminous flu...SrBaSiO 4 :Eu 2+  phosphor: a novel application for improvingthe luminous flu...
SrBaSiO 4 :Eu 2+ phosphor: a novel application for improvingthe luminous flu...IJECEIAES
 
Introduction of By-BM Project; Geopolymer production from industrial by-prod...
Introduction of By-BM Project; Geopolymer production from industrial by-prod...Introduction of By-BM Project; Geopolymer production from industrial by-prod...
Introduction of By-BM Project; Geopolymer production from industrial by-prod...Zoltan Sas, PhD
 
Rapid reduction of ultrathin films of graphene oxide on large area silicon su...
Rapid reduction of ultrathin films of graphene oxide on large area silicon su...Rapid reduction of ultrathin films of graphene oxide on large area silicon su...
Rapid reduction of ultrathin films of graphene oxide on large area silicon su...Conference Papers
 
Preliminary study of poly (tetrahydrofurturyl acrylate) thin film as a potent...
Preliminary study of poly (tetrahydrofurturyl acrylate) thin film as a potent...Preliminary study of poly (tetrahydrofurturyl acrylate) thin film as a potent...
Preliminary study of poly (tetrahydrofurturyl acrylate) thin film as a potent...Journal Papers
 

Mais procurados (18)

2010_Nano Lett_P3HT-F8TBT PVs
2010_Nano Lett_P3HT-F8TBT PVs2010_Nano Lett_P3HT-F8TBT PVs
2010_Nano Lett_P3HT-F8TBT PVs
 
Utilizing CaCO 3 , CaF 2 , SiO 2 , and TiO 2 particles to enhance color hom...
Utilizing CaCO 3 , CaF 2 , SiO 2 , and TiO 2  particles  to enhance color hom...Utilizing CaCO 3 , CaF 2 , SiO 2 , and TiO 2  particles  to enhance color hom...
Utilizing CaCO 3 , CaF 2 , SiO 2 , and TiO 2 particles to enhance color hom...
 
1
11
1
 
Natural Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (NDSSCs) From Opuntia Prickly Pear Dye Usi...
Natural Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (NDSSCs) From Opuntia Prickly Pear Dye Usi...Natural Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (NDSSCs) From Opuntia Prickly Pear Dye Usi...
Natural Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells (NDSSCs) From Opuntia Prickly Pear Dye Usi...
 
Atomization of reduced graphene oxide ultra thin film for transparent electro...
Atomization of reduced graphene oxide ultra thin film for transparent electro...Atomization of reduced graphene oxide ultra thin film for transparent electro...
Atomization of reduced graphene oxide ultra thin film for transparent electro...
 
Ravi shankar curriculam vitae
Ravi shankar  curriculam vitaeRavi shankar  curriculam vitae
Ravi shankar curriculam vitae
 
IRJET - Photoluminescence Study of Rare Earth Doped ZnO Nanoparticles
IRJET - Photoluminescence Study of Rare Earth Doped ZnO NanoparticlesIRJET - Photoluminescence Study of Rare Earth Doped ZnO Nanoparticles
IRJET - Photoluminescence Study of Rare Earth Doped ZnO Nanoparticles
 
631332_2_merged_1423441293
631332_2_merged_1423441293631332_2_merged_1423441293
631332_2_merged_1423441293
 
A review on graphene based light emitting functional devices
A review on graphene based light emitting functional devicesA review on graphene based light emitting functional devices
A review on graphene based light emitting functional devices
 
Structure, Morphology & Infrared Spectroscopic Characterization of Ga (2x+2) ...
Structure, Morphology & Infrared Spectroscopic Characterization of Ga (2x+2) ...Structure, Morphology & Infrared Spectroscopic Characterization of Ga (2x+2) ...
Structure, Morphology & Infrared Spectroscopic Characterization of Ga (2x+2) ...
 
The Graphene Council Graphene Characterization Survey
The Graphene Council Graphene Characterization SurveyThe Graphene Council Graphene Characterization Survey
The Graphene Council Graphene Characterization Survey
 
Overview poe-2004
Overview poe-2004Overview poe-2004
Overview poe-2004
 
SrBaSiO 4 :Eu 2+ phosphor: a novel application for improvingthe luminous flu...
SrBaSiO 4 :Eu 2+  phosphor: a novel application for improvingthe luminous flu...SrBaSiO 4 :Eu 2+  phosphor: a novel application for improvingthe luminous flu...
SrBaSiO 4 :Eu 2+ phosphor: a novel application for improvingthe luminous flu...
 
Sas NORMVIII 2016_s
Sas NORMVIII 2016_sSas NORMVIII 2016_s
Sas NORMVIII 2016_s
 
Introduction of By-BM Project; Geopolymer production from industrial by-prod...
Introduction of By-BM Project; Geopolymer production from industrial by-prod...Introduction of By-BM Project; Geopolymer production from industrial by-prod...
Introduction of By-BM Project; Geopolymer production from industrial by-prod...
 
Rapid reduction of ultrathin films of graphene oxide on large area silicon su...
Rapid reduction of ultrathin films of graphene oxide on large area silicon su...Rapid reduction of ultrathin films of graphene oxide on large area silicon su...
Rapid reduction of ultrathin films of graphene oxide on large area silicon su...
 
Od3424682473
Od3424682473Od3424682473
Od3424682473
 
Preliminary study of poly (tetrahydrofurturyl acrylate) thin film as a potent...
Preliminary study of poly (tetrahydrofurturyl acrylate) thin film as a potent...Preliminary study of poly (tetrahydrofurturyl acrylate) thin film as a potent...
Preliminary study of poly (tetrahydrofurturyl acrylate) thin film as a potent...
 

Destaque

Innovation and nanotechnology development in Russia and China
Innovation and nanotechnology development in Russia and ChinaInnovation and nanotechnology development in Russia and China
Innovation and nanotechnology development in Russia and ChinaEvgeny Klochikhin
 
M. García Hernández-Graphene Flagship: an opportunity and a challenge
M. García Hernández-Graphene Flagship: an opportunity and a challengeM. García Hernández-Graphene Flagship: an opportunity and a challenge
M. García Hernández-Graphene Flagship: an opportunity and a challengeFundación Ramón Areces
 
History of nanotechnologies - Nanoscience and nanotechnologies
History of nanotechnologies - Nanoscience and nanotechnologiesHistory of nanotechnologies - Nanoscience and nanotechnologies
History of nanotechnologies - Nanoscience and nanotechnologiesNANOYOU
 

Destaque (7)

Innovation and nanotechnology development in Russia and China
Innovation and nanotechnology development in Russia and ChinaInnovation and nanotechnology development in Russia and China
Innovation and nanotechnology development in Russia and China
 
Development of the russian sea port infrastructure.
Development of the russian sea port infrastructure. Development of the russian sea port infrastructure.
Development of the russian sea port infrastructure.
 
M. García Hernández-Graphene Flagship: an opportunity and a challenge
M. García Hernández-Graphene Flagship: an opportunity and a challengeM. García Hernández-Graphene Flagship: an opportunity and a challenge
M. García Hernández-Graphene Flagship: an opportunity and a challenge
 
History of nanotechnologies - Nanoscience and nanotechnologies
History of nanotechnologies - Nanoscience and nanotechnologiesHistory of nanotechnologies - Nanoscience and nanotechnologies
History of nanotechnologies - Nanoscience and nanotechnologies
 
ppt on femtocell
ppt on femtocellppt on femtocell
ppt on femtocell
 
Rusnano
RusnanoRusnano
Rusnano
 
Nanotechnology ppt
Nanotechnology pptNanotechnology ppt
Nanotechnology ppt
 

Semelhante a Business Lecture - Graphene: March 2012

GRAPHENE PRESENTATION
GRAPHENE PRESENTATIONGRAPHENE PRESENTATION
GRAPHENE PRESENTATIONAman Gupta
 
Graphene -synthesis__characterization__properties_and_applications
Graphene  -synthesis__characterization__properties_and_applicationsGraphene  -synthesis__characterization__properties_and_applications
Graphene -synthesis__characterization__properties_and_applicationsAaron Ortiz
 
A Feasibility Study on Mechanical Properties of Concrete with Graphene Oxide
A Feasibility Study on Mechanical Properties of Concrete with Graphene OxideA Feasibility Study on Mechanical Properties of Concrete with Graphene Oxide
A Feasibility Study on Mechanical Properties of Concrete with Graphene OxideIRJET Journal
 
Seminar on Electrochemical Surface Structuring
Seminar on Electrochemical Surface StructuringSeminar on Electrochemical Surface Structuring
Seminar on Electrochemical Surface StructuringSRINJOY GUHA
 
CB vs Neat Poly F15 Poster
CB vs Neat Poly F15 PosterCB vs Neat Poly F15 Poster
CB vs Neat Poly F15 PosterKelsey Harlow
 
New organic infiltrants for 2-D and 3-D photonic crystals
New organic infiltrants for 2-D and 3-D photonic crystalsNew organic infiltrants for 2-D and 3-D photonic crystals
New organic infiltrants for 2-D and 3-D photonic crystalsKonstantin Yamnitskiy
 
Application of Graphene in electronics
Application of Graphene in electronicsApplication of Graphene in electronics
Application of Graphene in electronicsChinmay Chepurwar
 
New Applications of Graphene
New Applications of GrapheneNew Applications of Graphene
New Applications of GrapheneRuchica Kumar
 
Grinding graphene characteristics after physical process
Grinding graphene characteristics after physical processGrinding graphene characteristics after physical process
Grinding graphene characteristics after physical processjournal ijrtem
 
SURF presentation on Graphene
SURF presentation on GrapheneSURF presentation on Graphene
SURF presentation on GrapheneCarlos Ramos
 
Engineering Skills
Engineering SkillsEngineering Skills
Engineering Skillsisaacchao
 
Review paper (PPT) on Graphene.pptx
Review paper (PPT) on Graphene.pptxReview paper (PPT) on Graphene.pptx
Review paper (PPT) on Graphene.pptxSHIVCHARAN KUMAR
 
Graphene Project Report
Graphene Project ReportGraphene Project Report
Graphene Project Reportvishal anand
 
Final_41817_In situ and real time x-ray computed tomography _2015VJ
Final_41817_In situ and real time x-ray computed tomography _2015VJFinal_41817_In situ and real time x-ray computed tomography _2015VJ
Final_41817_In situ and real time x-ray computed tomography _2015VJMehul Pancholi
 
CV_Young Kwan Cho_20160826
CV_Young Kwan Cho_20160826CV_Young Kwan Cho_20160826
CV_Young Kwan Cho_20160826Cho YoungKwan
 
Deposition and Analysis of Graphene Thin Films
Deposition and Analysis of Graphene Thin FilmsDeposition and Analysis of Graphene Thin Films
Deposition and Analysis of Graphene Thin FilmsAndy Skippins
 

Semelhante a Business Lecture - Graphene: March 2012 (20)

GRAPHENE PRESENTATION
GRAPHENE PRESENTATIONGRAPHENE PRESENTATION
GRAPHENE PRESENTATION
 
2007nninREUcopeland
2007nninREUcopeland2007nninREUcopeland
2007nninREUcopeland
 
RESUME
RESUMERESUME
RESUME
 
Graphene -synthesis__characterization__properties_and_applications
Graphene  -synthesis__characterization__properties_and_applicationsGraphene  -synthesis__characterization__properties_and_applications
Graphene -synthesis__characterization__properties_and_applications
 
Stephen hodge versarien
Stephen hodge   versarienStephen hodge   versarien
Stephen hodge versarien
 
A Feasibility Study on Mechanical Properties of Concrete with Graphene Oxide
A Feasibility Study on Mechanical Properties of Concrete with Graphene OxideA Feasibility Study on Mechanical Properties of Concrete with Graphene Oxide
A Feasibility Study on Mechanical Properties of Concrete with Graphene Oxide
 
Seminar on Electrochemical Surface Structuring
Seminar on Electrochemical Surface StructuringSeminar on Electrochemical Surface Structuring
Seminar on Electrochemical Surface Structuring
 
Graphene: A Review
Graphene: A ReviewGraphene: A Review
Graphene: A Review
 
CB vs Neat Poly F15 Poster
CB vs Neat Poly F15 PosterCB vs Neat Poly F15 Poster
CB vs Neat Poly F15 Poster
 
New organic infiltrants for 2-D and 3-D photonic crystals
New organic infiltrants for 2-D and 3-D photonic crystalsNew organic infiltrants for 2-D and 3-D photonic crystals
New organic infiltrants for 2-D and 3-D photonic crystals
 
Application of Graphene in electronics
Application of Graphene in electronicsApplication of Graphene in electronics
Application of Graphene in electronics
 
New Applications of Graphene
New Applications of GrapheneNew Applications of Graphene
New Applications of Graphene
 
Grinding graphene characteristics after physical process
Grinding graphene characteristics after physical processGrinding graphene characteristics after physical process
Grinding graphene characteristics after physical process
 
SURF presentation on Graphene
SURF presentation on GrapheneSURF presentation on Graphene
SURF presentation on Graphene
 
Engineering Skills
Engineering SkillsEngineering Skills
Engineering Skills
 
Review paper (PPT) on Graphene.pptx
Review paper (PPT) on Graphene.pptxReview paper (PPT) on Graphene.pptx
Review paper (PPT) on Graphene.pptx
 
Graphene Project Report
Graphene Project ReportGraphene Project Report
Graphene Project Report
 
Final_41817_In situ and real time x-ray computed tomography _2015VJ
Final_41817_In situ and real time x-ray computed tomography _2015VJFinal_41817_In situ and real time x-ray computed tomography _2015VJ
Final_41817_In situ and real time x-ray computed tomography _2015VJ
 
CV_Young Kwan Cho_20160826
CV_Young Kwan Cho_20160826CV_Young Kwan Cho_20160826
CV_Young Kwan Cho_20160826
 
Deposition and Analysis of Graphene Thin Films
Deposition and Analysis of Graphene Thin FilmsDeposition and Analysis of Graphene Thin Films
Deposition and Analysis of Graphene Thin Films
 

Último

PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdf
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdfPDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdf
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdfHajeJanKamps
 
Building Your Personal Brand on LinkedIn - Expert Planet- 2024
 Building Your Personal Brand on LinkedIn - Expert Planet-  2024 Building Your Personal Brand on LinkedIn - Expert Planet-  2024
Building Your Personal Brand on LinkedIn - Expert Planet- 2024Stephan Koning
 
MoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor Presentation
MoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor PresentationMoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor Presentation
MoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor Presentationbaron83
 
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003believeminhh
 
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdf
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdfTalent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdf
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdfCharles Cotter, PhD
 
Anyhr.io | Presentation HR&Recruiting agency
Anyhr.io | Presentation HR&Recruiting agencyAnyhr.io | Presentation HR&Recruiting agency
Anyhr.io | Presentation HR&Recruiting agencyHanna Klim
 
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023Steve Rader
 
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdf
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdfGraham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdf
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdfAnhNguyen97152
 
Developing Coaching Skills: Mine, Yours, Ours
Developing Coaching Skills: Mine, Yours, OursDeveloping Coaching Skills: Mine, Yours, Ours
Developing Coaching Skills: Mine, Yours, OursKaiNexus
 
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)tazeenaila12
 
Lecture_6.pptx English speaking easyb to
Lecture_6.pptx English speaking easyb toLecture_6.pptx English speaking easyb to
Lecture_6.pptx English speaking easyb toumarfarooquejamali32
 
Mihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZ
Mihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZMihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZ
Mihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZKanakChauhan5
 
Live-Streaming in the Music Industry Webinar
Live-Streaming in the Music Industry WebinarLive-Streaming in the Music Industry Webinar
Live-Streaming in the Music Industry WebinarNathanielSchmuck
 
The End of Business as Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consu...
The End of Business as Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consu...The End of Business as Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consu...
The End of Business as Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consu...Brian Solis
 
TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...
TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...
TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...TalentView
 
Upgrade Your Banking Experience with Advanced Core Banking Applications
Upgrade Your Banking Experience with Advanced Core Banking ApplicationsUpgrade Your Banking Experience with Advanced Core Banking Applications
Upgrade Your Banking Experience with Advanced Core Banking ApplicationsIntellect Design Arena Ltd
 
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptxHELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptxHelene Heckrotte
 
UNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING
UNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISINGUNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING
UNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISINGlokeshwarmaha
 
Slicing Work on Business Agility Meetup Berlin
Slicing Work on Business Agility Meetup BerlinSlicing Work on Business Agility Meetup Berlin
Slicing Work on Business Agility Meetup BerlinAnton Skornyakov
 

Último (20)

PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdf
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdfPDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdf
PDT 89 - $1.4M - Seed - Plantee Innovations.pdf
 
Building Your Personal Brand on LinkedIn - Expert Planet- 2024
 Building Your Personal Brand on LinkedIn - Expert Planet-  2024 Building Your Personal Brand on LinkedIn - Expert Planet-  2024
Building Your Personal Brand on LinkedIn - Expert Planet- 2024
 
MoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor Presentation
MoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor PresentationMoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor Presentation
MoneyBridge Pitch Deck - Investor Presentation
 
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003
The Vietnam Believer Newsletter_MARCH 25, 2024_EN_Vol. 003
 
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdf
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdfTalent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdf
Talent Management research intelligence_13 paradigm shifts_20 March 2024.pdf
 
Anyhr.io | Presentation HR&Recruiting agency
Anyhr.io | Presentation HR&Recruiting agencyAnyhr.io | Presentation HR&Recruiting agency
Anyhr.io | Presentation HR&Recruiting agency
 
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
NASA CoCEI Scaling Strategy - November 2023
 
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdf
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdfGraham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdf
Graham and Doddsville - Issue 1 - Winter 2006 (1).pdf
 
Developing Coaching Skills: Mine, Yours, Ours
Developing Coaching Skills: Mine, Yours, OursDeveloping Coaching Skills: Mine, Yours, Ours
Developing Coaching Skills: Mine, Yours, Ours
 
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
Harvard Business Review.pptx | Navigating Labor Unrest (March-April 2024)
 
Lecture_6.pptx English speaking easyb to
Lecture_6.pptx English speaking easyb toLecture_6.pptx English speaking easyb to
Lecture_6.pptx English speaking easyb to
 
Mihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZ
Mihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZMihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZ
Mihir Menda - Member of Supervisory Board at RMZ
 
Live-Streaming in the Music Industry Webinar
Live-Streaming in the Music Industry WebinarLive-Streaming in the Music Industry Webinar
Live-Streaming in the Music Industry Webinar
 
The End of Business as Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consu...
The End of Business as Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consu...The End of Business as Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consu...
The End of Business as Usual: Rewire the Way You Work to Succeed in the Consu...
 
WAM Corporate Presentation Mar 25 2024.pdf
WAM Corporate Presentation Mar 25 2024.pdfWAM Corporate Presentation Mar 25 2024.pdf
WAM Corporate Presentation Mar 25 2024.pdf
 
TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...
TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...
TalentView Webinar: Empowering the Modern Workforce_ Redefininig Success from...
 
Upgrade Your Banking Experience with Advanced Core Banking Applications
Upgrade Your Banking Experience with Advanced Core Banking ApplicationsUpgrade Your Banking Experience with Advanced Core Banking Applications
Upgrade Your Banking Experience with Advanced Core Banking Applications
 
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptxHELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
HELENE HECKROTTE'S PROFESSIONAL PORTFOLIO.pptx
 
UNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING
UNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISINGUNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING
UNLEASHING THE POWER OF PROGRAMMATIC ADVERTISING
 
Slicing Work on Business Agility Meetup Berlin
Slicing Work on Business Agility Meetup BerlinSlicing Work on Business Agility Meetup Berlin
Slicing Work on Business Agility Meetup Berlin
 

Business Lecture - Graphene: March 2012

  • 1. CambridgeIP Graphene: Cambridge Network business lecture Wednesday 14th March 2012 Quentin Tannock (Chairman, CambridgeIP) 1 ©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
  • 2. Graphene patenting trends • An increasingly crowded patent landscape around graphene. • From around 2007 we observe a ‘spike’ in the number of patent applications both from corporations and academic institutions. • Tannock, Q. Exploiting carbon flatland, Nature Materials, Vol 11, 2-5, (2012) Number of patents: Annual and cumulative University/Research Insitituions SMEs Multinational Other 900 800 700 Patents - yearly 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Pre-2001 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 © 2012 Patent numbers in the past two years may be under-represented. Patent applications may remain unpublished for up to 18 months.
  • 3. Universities in the graphene patent landscape • Across all years, there is a relatively high patent contribution from universities and research institutes consistent with other relatively early-stage and research- intensive technology spaces. Table 1: Most active inventors with university affiliations or collaborations. Source Tannock, Q. Exploiting carbon flatland, Nature Materials, Vol 11, 2-5, (2012) Nr Name Nr of Organisational affiliations in inventor's Example patent Example patent title patents Graphene patents number Jae-young Kumoh National Institute of Technology, Samsung, 1 62 US20110127497A1 Organic Light Emitting Device Using Graphene Choi Sungkyunkwan University Method For Exfoliating Carbonization Catalyst From Graphene Sheet, Method For Transferring Graphene Hyeon-jin 2 43 Samsung, Sungkyunkwan University US20090308520A1 Sheet From Which Carbonization Catalyst Is Exfoliated Shin To Device, Graphene Sheet And Device Using The Graphene Sheet Seon-mi Transparent Electrode Comprising Graphene Sheet, 3 39 Samsung, Sungkyunkwan University US20090071533A1 Yoon And Display And Solar Cell Including The Electrode Ilhan A. Battelle Memorial Institute, Princeton University, Functional graphene-polymer nanocomposites for gas 4 35 US20100096595A1 Aksay Vorbeck Materials Corporation barrier applications Hyun-jong Samsung, Seoul National University, Graphene device and method of manufacturing the 5 34 US20110089995A1 Chung Sungkyunkwan University same Samsung, Seoul National University, Methods Of Manufacturing And Transferring Larger 6 Sun-ae Seo 33 Sungkyunkwan University, The Leland Stanford US20110108521A1 Sized Graphene Junior University Graphene Roll To Roll Coating Apparatus And Byung Hee 7 28 Samsung, Sungkyunkwan University US20110195207 Graphene Roll To Roll Coating Method Using The Hong Same for Graphene Yun-sung Samsung, Seoul National University, 8 21 US20110108609 Methods Of Fabricating Graphene Using Alloy Catalyst Woo Sungkyunkwan University Robert K Princeton University, Vorbeck Materials 8 Prudhomm 21 US20110042813A1 Printed Electronics Corporation e Rodney S. Graphene Energy Inc., Northwestern University, 9 20 WO2008143829A2 Graphene Oxide Sheet Laminate and Method Ruoff Texas Instruments Inc., University of Texas James M. Graphene Compositions and Drilling Fluids Derived 9 20 University of Texas, William Marsh Rice University US20110059871 Tour Therefrom John S. Princeton University, Vorbeck Materials Coatings Containing Functionalized Graphene Sheets 10 18 US20110049437 Lettow Corporation and Articles Coated Therewith
  • 4. Graphene: Selected technology examples Year Author, Title, Journal Representative image Novoselov et al. "Electric Field Effect in 2004 Atomically Thin Carbon Films" , Science 306, 666-669 2006 Berger et al. "Electronic Confinement and Coherence in Patterned Epitaxial Graphene", Science 312, 1191-1196 Table 2: Graphene – 2007 Dikin et al. " Preparation and Selected characterization of graphene oxide paper", Nature 448, 457-460 Journal articles 2000 to 2011. 2009 Li et al. " Large-Area Synthesis of High- Source: Tannock, Q. Quality and Uniform Graphene Films on Exploiting carbon Copper Foils", Science 324, 1312-1314 flatland, Nature Materials, Vol 11, 2-5, (2012) 2010 Bae et al. " Roll-to-roll production of 30-inch graphene films for transparent electrodes", Nature Nanotechnology 5, 574–578 2010 Liao et al. " High-speed graphene transistors with a self-aligned nanowire gate", Nature 467, 305–308 4 ©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
  • 5. Example Patent 1: Andrea Ferrari US20110269629A1 SUPERCONDUCTING MATERIALS Assignee: ISIS INNOVATION [GB] Inventor: GIUSTINO FELICIANO [GB]; FERRARI ANDREA C [GB]; SAVINI GIANLUCA [GB] Publication Date: 2011-11-03 Abstract: Partially or fully saturated doped graphene materials are found to be superconducting. The saturation is with hydrogen or halogen. Doping is performed by substitution of carbon atoms or by applying an electric field. Diamond nano-rods are also found to be superconducting. These materials can be used in electronic devices having a gate.
  • 6. Example Patent 2: Nokia Research Cambridge WO2012013854A1 A GRAPHENE - TITANIUM DIOXIDE ELECTRODE Assignee: NOKIA CORP [FI] Inventor: WEI DI [GB]; BOWER CHRIS [GB]; RYHAENEN TEUVO TAPANI [GB]; ANDREW PIERS [GB] Publication Date: 2012-02-02 Abstract: An electrode comprises graphene, titanium dioxide and a binder, the binder configured to facilitate the binding together of the graphene and titanium dioxide to form the electrode.
  • 7. Corporations in the graphene patent landscape • The largest corporate patent portfolios in the graphene patent landscape are held by Samsung and Sandisk, reflecting industrial interests in semiconductor and memory-related applications. • Key differences in corporate research and development (R&D) focus and commercial strategies can be inferred from corporate patent filings. Samsung’s graphene patent network • Over 120 named inventors • University collaborators include: Hanyang, Kumoh, Liebig, Stanford, Seoul, Sungkyunkwan. Source: Tannock, Q. et al Patenting flatland: Graphene Exploitation challenges, CambridgeIP ,(2012)
  • 8. Geography of graphene patent filings 2007 and 2011 KR South Central and Korea South 2007 Other 2011 1% America 0% JP Japan 1% JP Japan 15% 5% KR South CN China Russia Korea WIPO WIPO 1% and USSR 8% 17% 24% 0% European EAPO/EA Patents (EPO Eurasian CN China & National) Patent 11% 8% Organization CA Canada 0% 1% European Patents (EPO & National) US PTO 8% CA US PTO 55% Canada 42% 1% © 2011 © 2011 Graphene patent landscape: Asia rising • Massive increase in patent filings in Asia • Much of the increase in patent filings in South Korea can be attributed to Samsung’s graphene patent activity. The increase in Chinese patent filings is more difficult to account for. Many Chinese patents were filed in 2011 and full details are not yet in the public domain. 8 © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
  • 9. Nanomaterials: Complex and evolving value chain ‘nano’ is a cross-cutting horizontal, not a vertical ‘industry’ R&D: Inventions & Discoveries, basic and applied Mixtures: Emulsions, coatings, composites, $$$ Raw materials: e.g. CNT, Products: Sports equipment, quantum dots components seals, drill bits $$$ Manufacture Integration Distribution $$$ $$$ Nanomaterials sub-spaces $$$ Services, Facilities, Equipment • Cross-cutting horizantal not a vertically integrated industry • End-markets and applications are likely to remain very diverse – hence no single group of dominant players • Evolving and disaggregated value chains – its not a vertical, but a horizontal with diverse end-markets and applications • The value chain is surrounded by key service providers, facility providers, equipment providers and other supporters • Patents protect every stage in the value chain – these can support and block new entrants in specific stages and around specific application areas Tannock, Q. Nanomaterials trends: Evidence from science literature, Nanomaterials 2011 (2011) © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
  • 10. Take the survey: IP issues facing the nanotech community • Our nanotech survey aims to identify the key intellectual property issues facing the nanotechnology community today. There is an option to receive a summary of survey results. • Take the survey: www.cambridgeip.com/index.php/knowledge- centre/nanotech-survey
  • 11. Contact Details Quentin Tannock Ilian Iliev (Chairman and Co-founder) (CEO and Co-founder) E: quentin.tannock@cambridgeip.com E: ilian.iliev@cambridgeip.com M: +44 (0) 778 621 0305 M: +44 (0) 778 637 3965 T: +44 (0)1223 778 846 T: +44 (0)1223 778 846 Corporate office Internet resources Website: www.cambridgeip.com Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd www.boliven.com 8a Kings Parade, Cambridge Blog: www.cambridgeip.com/blog CB2 1SJ, United Kingdom UK: +44 (0) 1223 777 846 Sign up for our free newsletter Fax: +44 (0) 20 3357 3105 on our home page 11 ©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
  • 12. Why graphene? Graphene: A fast developing research-enabled technology space, encompassing a very extensive set of potential markets and applications. • Graphene is the first 2D crystal discovered, with unusual electronic, optical and mechanical properties. • Graphene is of interest across industry fields as diverse as semiconductors and biotechnology. • Many graphene technology applications are in sectors which are notoriously patent and litigation intensive Examples of graphene applications include: • Faster computers: More efficient transistors based on graphene could result in thinner computer chips which use less energy and work faster. • More sensitive and robust sensors: Biotech sensor devices, environmental monitoring, oil & gas sensors • Thinner and flexible displays: Flexible and transparent electronics • Tougher and more conductive polymer composites: Much like multi-wall nanotubes (MWNT), graphene polymer composites can make polymers and other products, like natural rubber, stronger and electrically conductive.
  • 13. Patenting flatland: Graphene - Overview • Our report ‘Patenting flatland: Graphene – Exploitation challenges’ builds on research and analysis around university graphene patent activity, recently presented in Nature Materials: Tannock, Q. Exploiting carbon flatland, Nature Materials, Vol 11, 2-5, (2012) • CambridgeIP research for Nature Materials around the graphene patent activity and collaborations of universities has been updated and extended to analyse the entire graphene patent landscape and focus additionally on the activities of major corporations and leading SMEs. In addition the report considers the impact of leaders in the publication of non-patent literature on the patent landscape • The report is 70 pages long and contains 45 tables and figures Corporate/University R&D network • Our dataset ‘Graphene patents’ is an expert verified dataset of all graphene patents and patent applications globally recovered in our research – more than 2,000. All key patent information fields and all major jurisdictions are covered. Patent trends over time
  • 14. Technology Profile Reports: Overview • CambridgeIP brings its significant experience in building patent-based technology intelligence with leading Patent trends over time technologists and investors to create Technology Profile Reports. • CambridgeIP’s patent-based approach provides a different perspective to understanding investment in Patents are inter-related R&D, geographical distribution and size of markets, market value chains, how a technology area is evolving and what are the fundamental drivers of its long-term performance. • Our analysis helps readers identify and assess those technologies where commercial value is concentrated. Corporate/University Patents cost money and significant organisational R&D networks resources to secure and maintain. Patents can provide a useful indication of those technologies that patent holders are prepared to spend money to protect.
  • 15. Patenting flatland: Graphene – In our report • Graphene: Key enablers and barriers • Most important graphene patents • Top cited patents • Largest patent families • Graphene manufacturing techniques • Timeline highlighting key events in the graphene patent landscape • Geographical analysis of patent activity • Technology component analysis of patent portfolios • Patent activity and company profiles of leading small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) in the graphene space • Identification of leading major corporations in graphene by number of patents filed, with example patents • What to watch for in the graphene patent landscape • Conclusions and recommendations for investors, researchers and policymakers
  • 16. Patenting flatland: Graphene – Table of Contents Table of Contents About CambridgeIP and Technology Profile Reports .......................................................................................................... 0 Other CambridgeIP Reports .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Patent-based Intelligence ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................................... 7 Why Graphene? ................................................................................................................................................................. 9 Graphene History and Context ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Graphene, a Nanomaterial .......................................................................................................................................... 13 Graphene Technology ...................................................................................................................................................... 15 Patents in the Graphene flatland ...................................................................................................................................... 18 Who owns the graphene flatland? ............................................................................................................................... 22 Universities and Research Institutes ............................................................................................................................ 26 Sungkyunkwan University............................................................................................................................................ 30 Rice University ............................................................................................................................................................ 31 Manchester University ................................................................................................................................................. 32 Multinational corporations ............................................................................................................................................ 34 Samsung’s graphene patent network........................................................................................................................... 36 Sandisk 3D’s graphene patent network ....................................................................................................................... 38 SMEs .......................................................................................................................................................................... 38 Company profile: Vorbeck Materials Corp.................................................................................................................... 40 Company Profile: Nanotek Instruments Inc. ................................................................................................................. 41 Company Profile: Graphene Industries ........................................................................................................................ 42 Collaborations and licensing relationships ................................................................................................................... 43 Key inventors .............................................................................................................................................................. 43 Geography of patent filings: Graphene ........................................................................................................................ 44 Most frequently cited US patents ................................................................................................................................. 45 Patent families ............................................................................................................................................................. 46 Patent portfolio composition by technologies ............................................................................................................... 48 Most recently filed patents ........................................................................................................................................... 49 Patent trend conclusions ............................................................................................................................................. 52 Recommendations and Conclusions ................................................................................................................................ 53 Key developments to watch for .................................................................................................................................... 55 About CambridgeIP .......................................................................................................................................................... 56 CambridgeIP Executives ............................................................................................................................................. 57 CambridgeIP Products and Services ........................................................................................................................... 58 Appendix 1: Additional analysis of the graphene patent landscape ................................................................................... 59 Appendix 2: Methodology & Detailed Patent Information .................................................................................................. 63 Methodology................................................................................................................................................................ 63 Patent family explanation and context ......................................................................................................................... 65 Patent IPC Codes........................................................................................................................................................ 66 Disclaimer and Registered Company Information ............................................................................................................. 68 To read a report overview & table of contents in more details please visit us at http://www.boliven.com/boliven_landscapes/patenting_flatland_graphene
  • 17. Patenting flatland: Graphene – Access Access the full report and full dataset here: • http://www.boliven.com/boliven_landscapes/ patenting_flatland_graphene
  • 18. Appendix Outline • Appendix: CambridgeIP background & contacts • Nanotech Case Studies: Examples of past work • CambridgeIP snapshot • CambridgeIP experience • CambridgeIP team • Contacts 18 © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
  • 19. CS 1: Rapid mapping of large nanotech spaces - UK nanotechnology patent audit Client profile Senior executives from a publically funded organisation approached CambridgeIP for assistance in mapping a broad section of the UK nanotechnology space Business situation • A key driver was the need to inform our clients’ strategy in this complex and patent intensive space • Our remit was to assist client executives develop a clear understanding of the existing landscape, identify areas of relative strength & weakness and existing R&D collaborations, analyse trends and provide statistical information & benchmarking data for use in business planning and stakeholder reports Our approach • Working with CambridgeIP and senior industry experts we developed and implemented a complex patent search strategy • Results were analysed using our proprietary tools and methods and a focus area for deep analysis was identified • A workshop was conducted for client executives with our internal experts, assisting interpretation and dissemination of findings Results and benefits • Identification of fundamental technologies and key actors • Insights into corporate R&D collaborations - identiifying key players in the • Identification of areas of strength together with technologies applicable to patent space, together with their overlapping relationships multiple sectors of application for future focus by our client • Independent and fact-based assessments of the client organisations impact • Understanding of recent M&A activity with significant impacts on the on UK IP assets, valuable in stakeholder reporting ownership of the UK’s nanotechnology IP assets 19 © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
  • 20. CS 2: University spin-off, competitor strategy analysis using patent-based Intelligence Client profile A top UK University spin-out approached us for an IP Landscape report. Business situation • The client was backed by a major UK government funding organisation. • The CEO of the company required deep intelligence about industry incumbents’ R&D strategy. • The client also needed independent analysis of the industry’s patent landscape for use in technology licensing negotiations and structuring a strategic partnership. Our approach Results and benefits • Working with the client’s senior technical and business • The resulting patent-based intelligence was used in representatives we defined the client’s technology and market negotiations by our client. spaces • The client felt that the findings on competitors’ patenting • We identified two technology focus areas of critical activity helped secure a go-ahead for a joint venture with a importance to the client’s technology with the client and major industry player: “The strategic partner’s reaction to the performed an IP Landscape report these two areas report’s findings was startling: immediately inviting us to their HQ to meet with their Head of Development to finalize an agreement towards jointly developing a product.” • The report has also been used by the client when applying for participation Framework 7 programs, by demonstrating the client’s deep knowledge of the industry’s patenting trends. Competitor Analysis of Technology Focus in Client's Field Assignee Rank by # of Total # Year of Total Patents Portfolio 5 Year Name Patents in Patents in entry into in Overall Proportion Growth of The example shows how patent data can be Client Tech. Client Tech. the field Industry of Tech. in Focus used to analyse the R&D strategy of Space Space Space Field competitors, and to develop licensing strategy. Company 1 1 37 1993 6,576 1.6% 48.6% The findings suggest that Company 7 is Company 2 2 25 1998 33 100.0% 56.0% aggressively expanding into the client’s field: it Company 3 3 19 1997 2,007 7.1% 15.8% has the highest growth rate of patenting Company 4 4 16 1992 1,646 2.1% 62.5% activity. In turn Company 2 is most dependent Company 5 5 14 1999 840 7.2% 92.9% Company 6 6 11 1995 8,838 4.1% 63.6% on this field for its strategic success: 100% of Company 7 15 6 2003 400 1.8% 100.0% its patents are in the field of focus. © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
  • 21. CS 3: IP Landscape® - nano-sensor devices Client profile A medium sized VC funded company delivering nano-enabled sensing solutions to the defense and homeland security sectors approached CambridgeIP for assistance updating their IP portfolio and developing an up-to-date patent landscape Business situation • Sophisticated and well-advised client with good understanding of its IP space and competitors, holding a relatively large patent portfolio. • Key drivers were to improve understanding of adjacent IP spaces, increase efficiency and structure in IP intelligence gathering activities, inform investor communications Our approach • We audited the client’s patent holdings, developing indexed and cross-referenced patent databases; We defined the client’s space and identified adjacent spaces, undertaking IP Landscape and benchmarking analysis against the client’s existing portfolio. Business intelligence and key statistics were extracted using the RedEyeTM suite of tools. Results and benefits • Identified technology migration opportunities & threats from adjacent technology spaces • Demonstrated client’s dominance of aspects of its IP Landscape • The client used our independent findings and analysis in presentations to VC investors, as part of a successful Series C funding round. • Identified existing, known, players and new entrants to the client’s core IP space – including newly active academic institutes and corporations • Improved organisation of the client’s existing portfolio, laying a foundation for future portfolio management • Identified portfolio gaps for our client to plug and areas for consideration in future patent filings 21 © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
  • 22. CS 4: Accelerate licensing strategy development – early stage surgical materials technology Client profile A leading UK University asked us to help identify market opportunities for an early stage surgical materials development Business situation • Previous market research had not resulted in uptake of the technology by corporate prospects • A go / stop decision point was imminent as international PCT roll-out of an initial patent application approached Our approach Results and benefits • 20+ organisations were identified, were categorised by type and arranged in order of priority for approach by our client • Marketing objectives and recommendations were made in relation to each organisation type • Key geographical markets containing high profile licensing prospects were identified for addition to PCT designated states lists • Information on similar approaches, including diagrams, were provided • We defined the technology space and implemented a multi-layer to client academic experts in a convenient format search strategy that aimed at identifying • licensing candidates • potential collaboration partners • key markets & applications • critical geographical areas • Information useful to marketing the technology • Results and recommendations were presented to the client in a PowerPoint summary report, and cross-referenced Excel dataset • A workshop with the client's TTO representatives and client’s academic experts aids understanding and dissemination of results and recommendations 22 © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
  • 23. Appendix Outline • Appendix: CambridgeIP background & contacts • Nanotech Case Studies: Examples of past work • CambridgeIP snapshot • CambridgeIP experience • CambridgeIP team • Contacts 23 © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
  • 24. Our offerings IP Landscape® Open innovation Technology Technology mapping market survey Expert built patent Identify technology Pinpoint emerging Identify market – Knowledge transfer datasets focused on ownership in complex technology patterns technology niches in portal your technology spaces & hotspots rapidly developing Access over 100 markets million scientific Identify prior art in a Shortlist acquisition Understand documents, including technology space opportunities technology value Inform in-house R&D the latest patents chains strategy Uncover inventor & Identify overlaps with Conduct technology collaborator networks your own technology Identify technology Influence public literature searches portfolio market & sector innovation Clarify strengths & commercialisation support strategies Perform high-level weaknesses of patent Conduct due scenarios analytics on patent portfolios diligence on external data partners Locate prospective Prioritise key market Confirm freedom to partners, acquisitions segments and identify Collaborative patent operate & technology Identify open and clients strategic partners & landscaping with white space analyses innovation collaboration your colleagues opportunities in your Information on opportunities Support investment own and others’ IP partner/acquisition Boliven Landscapes due diligence and portfolios candidates operating Identify in what areas Access valuable preparation for fund in your area of you need to build an patent datasets raising CxO compatible interest IP Landscape combined with materials, workshops industry expert Understand market and seminars analyses trends 24
  • 25. CambridgeIP’s technology and knowledge platforms CambridgeIP’s offerings are based on a combination of: • Proprietary software and workflow platforms tested through more than 140 real life projects • A 100 million document database of patent and non-patent literature • Quality assurance and report standards that ensure consistency in the outputs for our clients • The Boliven.com online platform of technology literature search and analytics with 8,000+ registered users and 30,000+ unique visitors per month RedEye: our software analytics and workflow platform Boliven.com: a leading portal for R&D and IP professionals 25 © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
  • 26. Appendix Outline • Appendix: CambridgeIP background & contacts • Nanotech Case Studies: Examples of past work • CambridgeIP snapshot • CambridgeIP experience • CambridgeIP team • Contacts 26 © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
  • 27. Our clients We have delivered more than 100 projects with leading organisations: including major corporations, research institutes, service providers, high-tech SMEs and investors Selected clients: … and other leading big pharma 27 © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
  • 28. Thought leadership Selected publications: CambridgeIP is a recognised thought leader in the technology intelligence space. Our research has been covered by the Harvard Business Review, Financial Times, Nature Publishing Group and other leading media. Our collaborations include Chatham House, University of Sussex and Cambridge University’s Judge Business School. 28 ©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
  • 29. Health and life sciences Medical devices Pharmaceutical OTC drugs Auto-injectors formulations Analgesics Inhalers Excipients Anti-microbial Endoscopy Carriers Anti- fungal Ultrasound Liposomes Wound healing Propellants Vaccines e-Health Nanoparticles Dendritic cell Capsules Recombinant vector T- Diagnostics cell receptor peptide Telehealth vaccines Manufacturing DNA vaccination Blood glucose Heart rate processes Blood pressure Spray drying Gene therapy Biomarkers Freeze drying Silencing Jet milling Tissue targeting Filling Active Packaging pharmaceutical Regenerative ingredients Generics medicine Biopharmaceuticals Cell therapy Bio-similars Tissue targeting iPSC Re-formulation Drug conjugation Tissue engineering Patents expiries New chemical entities Cell-based vaccines 29 ©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
  • 30. Clean tech and energy Wind energy Fuel cells Nano devices systems & materials Biomass Advanced Geothermal refrigeration energy Systems Photovoltaic & Clean coal Refineries, component carbon capture power gen, technologies CO2-EOR co-gen. Concentrated Marine Desalination solar & other transport and water energy storage sanitation systems Smart grid 30 ©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
  • 31. Telecommunications and electronics Wireless authentication Geographical systems Physical/Remote access control GIS measurements Merchant/Purchasing Satellite navigation/GPS Digital credentials Clean tech Telecoms standards Smart grid ETSI Smart meters Continua alliance Transport management RFID Distributed sensor systems Blue tooth Energy harvesting Near field communication Radio frequency identification Internet & data handling Search Hardware Cloud computing Card readers Data fusion Routers Database replication Mems Flexible displays Contactless card Mobile devices/applications Satellite communications E-reader Mobile search Application software e-Health Media convergence Remote diagnostics 3G/4G/WiFi Device access control 31 ©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
  • 32. Nanotechnology Nanomaterials Tissue engineering CNT Nano-materials Graphene Nano-fibers Nanoparticles Scaffolds Nanobiotechnology Nanoparticles Bio-compatible nanoparticles Colloidal gold DNA nanotechnology Iron nanoparticles Nanospheres Nanostructures Nanoformulations Platinum nanoparticles Quantum dots Silver nanoparticles Carbon nanotubes CNT, SWNT, DWNT, MWNT Functionalization Industrial fields Production Advanced materials Purification Automotive, Aerospace Electronics Paints & Coatings Nanotoxicity Nanotubes Nanospheres Environmental Nanoparticles applications Risk assessment technologies Construction materials Energy storage, generation and transmission 32 ©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved Water purification
  • 33. Appendix Outline • Appendix: CambridgeIP background & contacts • Nanotech Case Studies: Examples of past work • CambridgeIP snapshot • CambridgeIP experience • CambridgeIP team • Contacts 33 © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
  • 34. Selected team members Quentin Tannock Ilian Iliev Dr Robert Brady Mark Meyer Ralph Poole Vladimir Yossifov Chairman & co-founder CEO & co-founder Non-Exec Director Business Development Boston Geneva Representative Manager Representative North America Arthur Lallement Helena van der Merwe Sarah Helm Yanjun Zhao Senior Associate Senior Associate Senior Associate Senior Associate 34 © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
  • 35. Key team members 1 Quentin Tannock (Chairman & co-founder)  Quentin leads our work in Nanotechnology, Materials, Health and Investment strategy. He has managed IP Landscape, IP Strategy and M&A and investment strategy projects for multinational corporations, investment groups and leading universities. His IP strategy related work has been covered in Bloomberg, Nature Publishing Group, The Wall Street Journal and elsewhere.  Prior experience: founder of a successful company in the chemical sector; law lecturer; facilitated major R&D collaborations at Cambridge University (Electronics, Photonics & Nanotechnology); member of Lambert working group tasked by government to draft model contracts for industry- university collaborations; IP analysis & strategic advice to nanotechnology venture capitalists; assisting Cambridge University Institute of Biotechnology start-ups (bio-nano diagnostic devices) with commercial and fundraising strategies  Education: Law, (Roman-Dutch, Common Law, International Law in Cambridge & elsewhere) Ilian Iliev (CEO & co-founder)  Ilian leads our work in Energy & CleanTech and Telecoms areas. Ilian has published widely and has lead IP Landscape and IP Strategy projects for the full range of participants in high- technology sectors. He has assisted multi-national corporations and SMEs with their industrial partnering and fund-raising strategies.  Prior experience: strategy & innovation advisory work for a Magic Circle law firm; award-winning biotech start-up in Cambridge; policy advice; 1990s: founded and ran a 100+ employee business in the electrical industry in Southern Africa  Education: Economics and Management; Ccmpleting a PhD on ‘Innovation Finance’ at the Judge Business School, Cambridge University Dr Robert Brady (non-Exec. Director)  Prior experience: Founder of Brady plc a leading supplier of transaction and risk management software solutions to companies and banks operating in the metals and minerals, energy and 'soft' commodity sectors. Dr Brady acts as an active mentor and advisor for several growth companies, specializing in information technology and services. He is the current treasurer of Cambridge Angels investment group.  Education: fellow at Trinity College, Cambridge, where he specialized in the field of physics. 35 © 2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
  • 36. Contact Details Quentin Tannock Ilian Iliev (Chairman and Co-founder) (CEO and Co-founder) E: quentin.tannock@cambridgeip.com E: ilian.iliev@cambridgeip.com M: +44 (0) 778 621 0305 M: +44 (0) 778 637 3965 T: +44 (0)1223 778 846 T: +44 (0)1223 778 846 Corporate office Internet resources Website: www.cambridgeip.com Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd www.boliven.com 8a Kings Parade, Cambridge Blog: www.cambridgeip.com/blog CB2 1SJ, United Kingdom UK: +44 (0) 1223 777 846 Sign up for our free newsletter Fax: +44 (0) 20 3357 3105 on our home page 36 ©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved
  • 37. Disclaimer This document contains data extracted from publicly available sources and documents created by third parties, such as patent data obtained Patent Offices’ databases. CambridgeIP accepts no liability for the accuracy or completeness of the data provided to it from such sources. The document may include analysis, together with opinions and observations expressed by CIP. They do not constitute legal advice. The Reader should not rely on them to make (or to refrain from making) any decision. Any decision is the Reader’s sole responsibility and CambridgeIP hereby excludes any and all liability for any loss of any nature suffered by the Reader, or by any colleague, client or customer of the Reader, as a direct or indirect result of use of any of the Report or of the making any business decision, or refraining from making any such decision, based wholly or partly on any data, expression of opinion, statement or other information or data contained in the document. For the avoidance of doubt it is recorded that CambridgeIP shall not be liable for any indirect, special, incidental, punitive, consequential losses or loss of profits. This limitation of liability shall not apply to injury or death to any person caused by CIP’s negligence (to which no limit applies). 37 ©2012 Cambridge Intellectual Property Ltd. All rights reserved