1. educate • fund • connect • supporteducate • fund • connect • support
Community-University Research
Partnership Award (CURES)
Pilot Grant Funding Information
Presenters
2. Objectives
To help you determine if CURES pilot grant
is right for you
Provide information and resources needed
to apply for CURES funding
3. Questions we will address
What is MICHR’s Pilot Grant Program?
What is “community”?
Why is community engagement in research
important?
How can MICHR assist community and
academic partners?
4. CURES Overview
MICHR agrees to support 100% up to 25K
No Department Match is Required for CURES
awards
Funding typically announced twice yearly,
usually with September and February deadlines
One-year pilot project, up to three projects
funded per year.
5. CURES Goals
1. Build capacity of communities to engage in research
partnerships.
2. Combine the experience in communities and at UM to
make a positive impact on local health.
3. Enhance networks and infrastructure that will
promote community engaged research.
7. Community is…
Broadly defined as a group of people
affiliated by similar characteristics
Social identities (Race/Ethnicity)
Economic backgrounds (Socio-economic
status)
Geographic location (City/Region)
Interests (childhood obesity prevention)
Principles of Community Engagement
second Edition, 2011. Print.
11. Benefits of Community
Engaged Research?
Trust and
Mutual
Respect
Combination
of
expertise
Foster
Co-learning
Israel et al. 1998
12. Who can apply?
Academic Partners
Faculty and staff at an academic institution
PIs are U of M faculty members
Eligible Academic partners
Senior Faculty
Junior faculty
Community Partners
Non-profit organizations
Community clinics
Health departments
Faith-based organizations
Schools
Neighborhood coalitions
Grassroots community groups
13. CURES Review Criteria
Investigator(s) - Are the PIs, collaborators
and other researchers well suited to the
project?
If the project is collaborative do the
investigators have complementary and
integrated expertise?
14. Pilot Grant Program
Goals
Assist early career ‘emerging’ Investigators by providing funding support
that will enable them to establish an independent clinical & translational
research path.
Encourage multi-disciplinary collaborations.
Promote the development of innovative and novel research projects across
the translational spectrum
Support promising research that is likely to lead to successful extramural
funding (through NIH, other governmental funding mechanism, or a
foundation)
15. Pilot Grant Funding Mechanisms
T1 - “Bench to Bedside”
T2 - “Bedside to Practice”
T3 – Community University
Research Partnership Award
(CURES)
Seed – (Mini-Pilots) small grants
16. Proposals will be reviewed and scored by both the MICHR
Scientific Review Committee and the Community Engagement
Coordinating Council.
Scientific Merit
Team Investigators
Community Priority
Community Benefit
Community
Involvement
Budget
Sustainability
Review Criteria
17. Expectations of Awardees
Attend a CECC meeting to discuss your project
prior to the start of your project
“Ethical Protections in Community-Engaged
Research” workshop
Attend the regional CTSA Conference or CTSA
Community Engagement sponsored symposium..
Program updates and progress report
19. Peer-to-Peer Depression Awareness Project: A collaboration
between the University of Michigan Depression Center and the
Ann Arbor Public Schools
Community High’s Peer-to-Peer Campaign designated March as
“Depression Awareness Month” and conducted many of their
activities during this time frame.
“Thanks for making the film available…I had students raise the questions of suicide
prevention and how to recognize if a friend is suffering from depression, and they
wanted more information on the topic, so I think we should keep the ball rolling! I‘m so
glad to see such a concerted effort to raise awareness about mental health issues.” –
(Feedback from a forum leader)
20. Building a technology-enhanced social network intervention
to promote HIV testing among young men who have sex with
men (MSM): Pilot study
This pilot study aimed to better understand the role of
psychosocial factors and local social and sexual networks in
Washtenaw-area young MSMs' decisions to have an HIV test.
"Clearly, the university partners has the expertise in conducting research and
interpreting research findings. It was the community partners, however, that really
helped to refine research protocols, interview tools and recruitment plans in a manner
that would be sensitive to community needs and result in desired outcomes.
Community members and agency staff have learned about research methods in the
process and our university partners have learned more about community dynamics."
(Young Men’s Study, PI: T. Veinot)
21. Parenting while incarcerated
The goal of this community-university partnership
project is to implement an evidence-based parenting
program with incarcerated mothers in Flint, MI.
“Without the community partner, this research could not happen. The community partner
has identified ways for the intervention to continue after the research project has ended,
how to manualize the intervention, and how to continue to evaluate the program both from a
process and outcome perspective. This will be very useful for the program as they apply for
funding to continue this programming.”
(Parenting While Incarcerated, PI: A. Miller)
22. MICHR Resources
Community Engagement – provides training, consultation, and
resources to assist community-based organizations and academic
researchers in building equitable, effective partnerships to improve
health
http://www.michr.umich.edu/community/communityengagement
Research Development – provides free services and consultation to
strengthen study design and grant proposals
http://www.michr.umich.edu/services/researchdevelopment
Clinical and Health Research Recruitment – provides tools and
resources to facilitate participant recruitment in clinical and health
research studies
http://www.michr.umich.edu/services/recruitmentprogram
Education & Mentoring – provides multidisciplinary education,
career development, and mentoring programs for clinical and
translational researchers http://www.michr.umich.edu/education
23. References
Principles of Community Engagement. [Washington, D.C.]:
Dept. of Health & Human Services, National Institutes of
Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Agency
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Clinical and
Translational Science Awards, 2011. Print.
Israel, Barbara A., Amy J. Schulz, Edith A. Parker, and Adam
B. Becker. "REVIEW OF COMMUNITY-BASED RESEARCH:
Assessing Partnership Approaches to Improve Public Health."
Annual Review of Public Health 19.1 (1998): 173-202. Print.
24. Contacts
Assistance with CURES applications: Adam
Paberzs, Research Liaison, 734-763-8880,
adampabe@umich.edu
MICHR pilot funding mechanisms and mGrants:
Debra Warrick, Pilot Grant Program Coordinator,
734-998-7626, warrickd@umich.edu
Traditional research has often conducted research ON communities and not WITH and FOR communities
Community engaged research seeks to move past traditional research by creating collaboration channels for community and university partners throughout the whole research process
Build trust and mutual respect between the community and university partners
Combine the expertise of community and university partners
Strengthen collaboration and open communication to foster co-learning
Increase participant recruitment and retention throughout the years
T1 - First phase of translational research or “Bench to Bedside” moves a basic discovery (molecular-, cell- or animal based models) into a clinical application
T2 - “Bedside to Practice” applies clinical discoveries to practice where efficacy can be evaluated & therapeutic strategies tested
T3 – Community University Research Partnership Award (CURES) Research that applies evidence-based practices developed in T2 research to the broader community through the community based partnerships and practice-based research networks (RIP)
Seed - Sometimes called Mini-Pilots are small grants that have flexibility in allowable expenses and will support any aspect of promising and innovative research
Scientific Merit: Does the research address a significant clinical or health-related challenge? Does the project have the potential to develop novel concepts, approaches, and methodologies?
Team Investigators: Are the PI/Co-Is and other collaborators well suited to the study? What unique skills and expertise do community and academic partners bring to the project?
Community Priority: Does the proposed project address a community-identified priority? Have the applicants demonstrated that the topic is of importance to both the community partner and community of focus?
Community Benefit: How will the project benefit the community partner organization and participants involved? Is there a tangible benefit that will be left with the community as a result of the project (e.g. product, knowledge, program)?
Community Involvement: To what extent will the community partner organization be involved or invited to be involved in all phases of the research (proposal development, study design, data collection, analysis, dissemination)?
Budget: Is the budget distributed equitably between the community and academic partners?
Sustainability: How will the community-university partnership be sustained beyond the scope of the one-year funding period? If funded, what is the likelihood that this award will lead to external funding? Have potential sponsors or funding sources been identified?
Other relevant review criteria include: strong project approach, methodology and design, clear articulation of project goals, background, significance, emphasis on translation for improved health outcomes and reducing health disparities, and likelihood of success in achieving the project objectives.
a. Attend a CECC meeting (composed of UM faculty, staff and community members) to discuss your project prior to the start of your project
b. Participate in the “Ethical Protections in Community-Engaged Research” workshop prior to the start of your project (contact Adam Paberzs for scheduling)
c. Attend the regional CTSA Conference or CTSA Community Engagement sponsored symposium. The Community Engagement Program will pay for the attendance of two representatives from your project.
d. Provide program updates by request and a progress report at six-months and one-year from the project start date, including any grant submissions and funding obtained related to this research.
Title: The Peer-to-Peer Depression Awareness Project: A collaboration between the University of Michigan Depression Center and the Ann Arbor Public Schools
Partners: James Cranford, PhD, Research Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Michigan (Academic Partner); Jennie Jester, Assistant Research Scientist, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Michigan (Academic Partner); and Joyce Hunter, Ann Arbor Public Schools (Community Partner)
The purpose of this pilot study is to expand the P2P program with an added research component to assess the effects of the P2P project on 1) knowledge of depressive illnesses, 2) stigma associated with depressive illnesses, and 3) awareness of help-seeking behaviors associated with depressive illnesses. These hypotheses will be tested with 1) the student P2P team members from each school and 2) a sample of students from each school who are not P2P team members.
Title: Building a technology-enhanced social network intervention to promote hiv testing among young men who have sex with men (MSM): Pilot study
Partners: Tiffany Veinot, Assistant Professor, School of Information, School of Public Health, UM-Ann Arbor (Academic Partner); Jimena Loveluck, Executive Director, HIV/AIDS Resource Center (Community Partner); and Jose Bauermeister, School of Public Health, UM-Ann Arbor (Academic Partner)
Through this pilot study, we aim to better understand the role of psychosocial factors and local social and sexual networks in Washtenaw-area young MSMs' decisions to have an HIV test. We will conduct 30 qualitative interviews with racially/ethnically diverse young MSM regarding their HIV testing decisions, online behaviors and personal network characteristics. Drawing from the interview data and our guiding theoretical model, we will conduct a web survey with 200 Washtenaw-area young MSM to assess determinants of their HIV testing decisions. Results from this pilot study will lay the foundation for a competitive proposal to compare the effectiveness of an Internet-based, peer-referred mechanism for HIV testing versus a face-to-face peer-referral control group.
Title: Parenting while incarcerated
Partners: Alison Miller, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Health Education & Health Behavior, School of Public Health, University of Michigan (Academic Partner); and Shirley Cochran, Founder and Director, Motherly Intercession (Community Partner)
Goals of the proposed study are to: 1) document the feasibility of conducting Strengthening Families sessions in the jail 2) tailor outcome measures as appropriate for an incarcerated population; and 3) gather preliminary outcome data regarding incarcerated mothers' parenting skills and attitudes, depression symptoms, and quality of relationship with their child's caregiver