SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 20
Baixar para ler offline
Cost-Effectiveness of PCI with Drug Eluting
Stents vs. Bypass Surgery for Patients with
      Diabetes and Multivessel CAD:
     Results from the FREEDOM Trial

   Elizabeth A. Magnuson, Valentin Fuster, Michael E. Farkouh,
    Kaijun Wang, Katherine Vilain, Haiyan Li, Jaime Appelwick,
Victoria Muratov, Lynn A. Sleeper, Mouin Abdallah, David J. Cohen


              Saint Luke’s Mid America Heart Institute
                University of Missouri-Kansas City
                       Kansas City, Missouri
Disclosures

• FREEDOM was supported by U01 grants
  #01HL071988 and #01HL092989 from the National
  Heart Lung and Blood Institute

  Other support
     Drug eluting stents were provided by Cordis, Johnson and
      Johnson and Boston Scientific

     Abciximab and an unrestricted research grant were provided
      by Eli Lilly and Company

     Clopidogrel was provided by Sanofi Aventis and Bristol-
      Myers Squibb
Background
                                      Time to Death/MI/Stroke


                                        PCI/DES
                        30              CABG
   Death/Stroke/MI, %




                                 Logrank P=0.005

                        20                          PCI/DES

                                                                     CABG

                        10




                                      5-Year Event Rates: 26.6% vs. 18.7%
                        0

                             0        1         2         3      4          5
                                          Years post-randomization
Patient Flow
                         1900 patients randomized




               947 assigned to          953 assigned to PCI
                   CABG
   36 no
 procedure                                                    9 no procedure
(withdrawn)                                                     (withdrawn)

               911 underwent              944 underwent
              revascularization          revascularization




          893 initial   18 initial      939 initial   5 initial
           CABG           PCI             PCI         CABG

                  Median follow-up duration: 47 months
Economic Study Analysis Plan

Primary Endpoint:
  • Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio expressed as
    cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained
     » Costs and QALYs were discounted at 3% annually



General Approach – 2 Stages:
  • In-trial analysis based on observed survival, health
    state utility (EQ-5D), and costs derived from reported
    health care resource use during the trial period
  • Lifetime analysis based on projections of survival,
    quality-adjusted survival and costs beyond the trial
    period
Costing Methods
PCI and CABG Procedures:
• Cath lab and CABG-related procedure costs based on
  measured resource utilization (procedure duration,
  balloons, stents, wires, etc.) and current unit costs
        DES cost = $1500/stent

• Ancillary hospital costs based on regression models
  developed from 2010 MedPAR data for FREEDOM-
  eligible patients
      Clinical events and complications rather than LOS were used
       as key predictors to avoid distortions due to marked differences
       in LOS across different countries/health care systems

Additional costs: CV and non-CV rehospitalizations, MD fees,
  outpatient CV care/testing and medications, cardiac rehabilitation
  and nursing home stays
Index Procedure Resource Use*

                                               CABG                    PCI
PCI procedures
    1                                                                 66.6%
    2                                                                 30.9%
    3-4                                                               2.3%
Drug-eluting stents                                                  4.1 ± 1.9
    Paclitaxel-eluting                                                45.6%
    Sirolimus-eluting                                                 51.7%
    Other drug-eluting stents                                         2.7%
Procedure duration (mins)                     248 ± 78              107 ± 6.7


Total Procedure Cost                     $9,739 ± $2,453         $13,014 ± $5,173

* Per protocol population (includes planned staged procedures)
Index Hospitalization Costs

                             Δ = $8,622
                             (p<0.001))


                  $34,467

                                                  $25,845




                       * ITT population (includes planned staged procedures)
5-Year Follow-up Resource Utilization
Rates per 100 person-years

20
                                            P<0.001

                                                               P=0.52
15


10
        P<0.001                                    17.2
                                                               14.6
                                                                      12.8
                                            10.8
 5
              6.8
        3.3
                           0   1.7
 0
     PCI Procedures   CABG Procedures CV Hospitalizations      Non-CV
                                                            Hospitalizations

                               CABG        PCI
Annual and Cumulative Costs: Years 1- 5

Annual
$25,000                                                                                            Cumulative
                                                                                                   $70,000


                                                                                                    $60,000
$20,000   Δ costs = $7878
                                                                                                    $50,000

$15,000
                                                                            Δ costs = $3641         $40,000


                                                                                                    $30,000
$10,000

                                                                                                    $20,000

 $5,000
                                                                                                    $10,000


    $0                                                                                              $0
            Year 1            Year 2              Year 3           Year 4          Year 5


               CABG Annual Cost        PCI Annual Cost     CABG Cumulative Cost    PCI Cumulative Cost
Annual Differences in Life Years and QALYs


      Time Since
                     Δ Life Years    Δ QALYs
     Randomization
                      (CABG-PCI)    (CABG-PCI)
        (Years)
          1            -0.008        -0.033
          2            -0.010        -0.034
          3            -0.0006       -0.029
          4            +0.015        -0.004

          5            +0.053        +0.031
Markov Model
For the Projection of Post-Trial Life Years, QALYs and Costs


• Monthly risk of death based on age, sex and race-
  matched data from US life tables calibrated to the
  observed 5 year mortality for the PCI population
        CABG effect based on a landmark analysis for years 2-5:
         mortality hazard ratio for CABG vs. PCI = 0.60

• Base case: Gradual attenuation of CABG effect
        Mortality hazard ratio increases from 0.60 to 1 in a linear
         fashion between 5 and 10 years; no impact of CABG beyond
         10 years

• Long-term costs and utility weights obtained from
  regression models developed from trial data
In-Trial and Projected Survival
             1            0.053 life years
                                                                          CABG
            0.8                                                           PCI



            0.6                              1.266 total life years
 Survival




                                             gained with CABG
                                             (0.794 when discounted at 3% annually)

            0.4



            0.2



             0
                  0   5      10        15     20           25           30            35
                               Years post-randomization
Lifetime Cost-Effectiveness Results
                                    $20,000
                                                     Cost                                            Cost
                                                     QALY                                            QALY
     ∆Long-term Cost (CABG – PCI)




                                    $10,000




                                         $0                                                     Cost = $5392
                                                                                              ∆QALY = 0.663 years
                                                                                              $8132/QALY gained
                                                                                                  with CABG

                                    -$10,000



                                                     Cost
                                                                               $50,000 per QALY       Cost
                                                     QALY                                            QALY
                                    -$20,000
                                               -2            -1            0              1                   2
                                                                  ∆QALYs (CABG – PCI)
Costs and QALYs discounted 3% annually
Cost-Effectiveness of CABG vs. PCI
           Sensitivity Analysis – No CABG Effect Beyond 5 Yrs
            1
                                                                             No CABG Effect
                                                                              Years 5 - 10
                              0.754 total life years
           0.8                gained with CABG
                              (0.439 when discounted at 3% annually)



           0.6
Survival




           0.4                                               CABG
                                                             PCI


           0.2
                                                                            Δ Costs   $9,485

                                                                            Δ QALYs   0.351
            0
                                                                            ICER      $27,022
                 0   5   10     15      20     25            30        35
                         Years post-randomization
                                                                            Pr < $50K/QALY= 82.4%
Cost-Effectiveness of CABG vs. PCI
 SYNTAX Score Tertiles
                  Low (<23)                          Mid (23-32)                       High (>32)
$20,000



$10,000



     $0



-$10,000



-$20,000
           -2      -1     0           1    2   -2      -1     0           1   2 -2      -1     0           1   2

                Δ Costs       $8,784                Δ Costs       $4,160             Δ Costs       $973

                Δ QALYs       0.407                 Δ QALYs       0.997              Δ QALYs       0.315

                ICER          $21,582               ICER          $4,172             ICER          $3,088



  Costs and QALYs discounted 3% annually
Subgroups

                                                     Prob.
   Subgroup         Δ Costs   Δ QALYs    ICER
                                                   < $50,000

 Male (n=1328)      $3,059     0.778     $3,932      99.8

 Female (n=527)     $9,249     0.510    $18,135      77.3

Age <60 (n=624)     $11,190    1.160     $9,647      99.8

Age 60-69 (n=621)   -$1,765    0.276    Dominant     80.5

Age ≥70 (n=610)     $6,892     0.349    $19,748      71.9

   US (n=351)       $4,701     1.120     $4,197      98.1

Non-US (n=1504)     $5,622     0.576     $9,760      96.5
Summary (1)

• CABG is associated with initial costs ≈ $9,000/patient
  higher than PCI
• Partially offset by lower costs associated with repeat
  revascularization and to a lesser extent cardiac meds
• At 5 years, CABG improved quality-adjusted life
  expectancy by ~ 0.03 years while increasing total
  costs by ~ $3,600/patient
• Over a lifetime horizon, CABG associated with 0.66
  QALYs gained and ~$5,400/patient higher costs
  yielding an ICER of $8,132/QALY gained
Summary (2)

• Results were robust to a broad range of
  sensitivity analyses regarding the duration of
  the CABG effect on both survival and costs

• Results were also consistent across a wide
  range of subgroups
Conclusions

• For patients with diabetes and multivessel
  CAD, CABG provides not only better long-
  term clinical outcomes than DES-PCI but
  these benefits are achieved at an overall cost
  that represents an attractive use of societal
  health care resources

• These findings provide additional support for
  existing guidelines that recommend CABG for
  diabetic patients with multivessel CAD

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Semelhante a Cost-Effectiveness of PCI with Drug Eluting…

Beacon Biomedical AIC Presentation
Beacon Biomedical AIC PresentationBeacon Biomedical AIC Presentation
Beacon Biomedical AIC PresentationScott Kelly
 
4_Medicare and caid_payment_valuation
4_Medicare and caid_payment_valuation4_Medicare and caid_payment_valuation
4_Medicare and caid_payment_valuationMichael Aponte | MHA
 
NOBLE LEFT MAIN BIFURCATION PCI.pptx
NOBLE LEFT MAIN BIFURCATION PCI.pptxNOBLE LEFT MAIN BIFURCATION PCI.pptx
NOBLE LEFT MAIN BIFURCATION PCI.pptxIrving Torres Lopez
 
Serious Cost Containment Without Cost Shifting to Employees Webinar
Serious Cost Containment Without Cost Shifting to Employees WebinarSerious Cost Containment Without Cost Shifting to Employees Webinar
Serious Cost Containment Without Cost Shifting to Employees WebinarJ.P. Farley Corporation
 
Financial model 300 bed teaching hospital (midwest) rev 0
Financial model 300 bed teaching hospital (midwest)  rev 0Financial model 300 bed teaching hospital (midwest)  rev 0
Financial model 300 bed teaching hospital (midwest) rev 0Lauraine Palm Singh,
 
Implications of the transfer ami trial for clinical practice
Implications of the transfer ami trial for clinical practiceImplications of the transfer ami trial for clinical practice
Implications of the transfer ami trial for clinical practiceTrimed Media Group
 
Assessing carbon value
Assessing carbon valueAssessing carbon value
Assessing carbon valuePeter Weisberg
 
Evaluation of transition scenarios for breast cancer screening in France to ...
Evaluation of transition scenarios for breast cancer screeningin France to ...Evaluation of transition scenarios for breast cancer screeningin France to ...
Evaluation of transition scenarios for breast cancer screening in France to ...HTAi Bilbao 2012
 
Pat Services Case Study
Pat Services Case StudyPat Services Case Study
Pat Services Case Studyclandtime
 
Summary of landmark CTO clinical trials and highlights from registries
Summary of landmark CTO clinical trials and highlights from registries Summary of landmark CTO clinical trials and highlights from registries
Summary of landmark CTO clinical trials and highlights from registries AhmedElBorae1
 
Memorial Hermann
Memorial HermannMemorial Hermann
Memorial Hermannlponssa
 

Semelhante a Cost-Effectiveness of PCI with Drug Eluting… (20)

Beacon Biomedical AIC Presentation
Beacon Biomedical AIC PresentationBeacon Biomedical AIC Presentation
Beacon Biomedical AIC Presentation
 
15 aimradial2016 fri A Amin
15 aimradial2016 fri A Amin15 aimradial2016 fri A Amin
15 aimradial2016 fri A Amin
 
Mann T 201110
Mann T 201110Mann T 201110
Mann T 201110
 
4_Medicare and caid_payment_valuation
4_Medicare and caid_payment_valuation4_Medicare and caid_payment_valuation
4_Medicare and caid_payment_valuation
 
NOBLE LEFT MAIN BIFURCATION PCI.pptx
NOBLE LEFT MAIN BIFURCATION PCI.pptxNOBLE LEFT MAIN BIFURCATION PCI.pptx
NOBLE LEFT MAIN BIFURCATION PCI.pptx
 
Serious Cost Containment Without Cost Shifting to Employees Webinar
Serious Cost Containment Without Cost Shifting to Employees WebinarSerious Cost Containment Without Cost Shifting to Employees Webinar
Serious Cost Containment Without Cost Shifting to Employees Webinar
 
Appendix
AppendixAppendix
Appendix
 
Financial model 300 bed teaching hospital (midwest) rev 0
Financial model 300 bed teaching hospital (midwest)  rev 0Financial model 300 bed teaching hospital (midwest)  rev 0
Financial model 300 bed teaching hospital (midwest) rev 0
 
Implications of the transfer ami trial for clinical practice
Implications of the transfer ami trial for clinical practiceImplications of the transfer ami trial for clinical practice
Implications of the transfer ami trial for clinical practice
 
Assessing carbon value
Assessing carbon valueAssessing carbon value
Assessing carbon value
 
Computers in Primary Care: Evolution or Revolution
Computers in Primary Care: Evolution or RevolutionComputers in Primary Care: Evolution or Revolution
Computers in Primary Care: Evolution or Revolution
 
Optimizing Agency Funding to Deliver SB1 projects
Optimizing Agency Funding to Deliver SB1 projectsOptimizing Agency Funding to Deliver SB1 projects
Optimizing Agency Funding to Deliver SB1 projects
 
17 Amin aimradial20170922 Cost of TRA
17 Amin aimradial20170922 Cost of TRA17 Amin aimradial20170922 Cost of TRA
17 Amin aimradial20170922 Cost of TRA
 
Aversano
AversanoAversano
Aversano
 
Evaluation of transition scenarios for breast cancer screening in France to ...
Evaluation of transition scenarios for breast cancer screeningin France to ...Evaluation of transition scenarios for breast cancer screeningin France to ...
Evaluation of transition scenarios for breast cancer screening in France to ...
 
Pat Services Case Study
Pat Services Case StudyPat Services Case Study
Pat Services Case Study
 
TIC100 決賽投影片
TIC100 決賽投影片TIC100 決賽投影片
TIC100 決賽投影片
 
Summary of landmark CTO clinical trials and highlights from registries
Summary of landmark CTO clinical trials and highlights from registries Summary of landmark CTO clinical trials and highlights from registries
Summary of landmark CTO clinical trials and highlights from registries
 
Revascularización miocárdica sin bomba; iguales resultados al año que la ciru...
Revascularización miocárdica sin bomba; iguales resultados al año que la ciru...Revascularización miocárdica sin bomba; iguales resultados al año que la ciru...
Revascularización miocárdica sin bomba; iguales resultados al año que la ciru...
 
Memorial Hermann
Memorial HermannMemorial Hermann
Memorial Hermann
 

Mais de Sociedad Latinoamericana de Cardiología Intervencionista

Mais de Sociedad Latinoamericana de Cardiología Intervencionista (20)

CENTURY: resultados clínicos del nuevo stent liberador de sirolimus y polímer...
CENTURY: resultados clínicos del nuevo stent liberador de sirolimus y polímer...CENTURY: resultados clínicos del nuevo stent liberador de sirolimus y polímer...
CENTURY: resultados clínicos del nuevo stent liberador de sirolimus y polímer...
 
ELISA 3: estrategia invasiva precoz vs tardía en pacientes sin supra desnivel...
ELISA 3: estrategia invasiva precoz vs tardía en pacientes sin supra desnivel...ELISA 3: estrategia invasiva precoz vs tardía en pacientes sin supra desnivel...
ELISA 3: estrategia invasiva precoz vs tardía en pacientes sin supra desnivel...
 
DEFLECT I: dispositivo de protección cerebral en TAVI
DEFLECT I: dispositivo de protección cerebral en TAVIDEFLECT I: dispositivo de protección cerebral en TAVI
DEFLECT I: dispositivo de protección cerebral en TAVI
 
POLAR ACS: plataforma bio absorbible en síndromes coronarios agudos
POLAR ACS: plataforma bio absorbible en síndromes coronarios agudosPOLAR ACS: plataforma bio absorbible en síndromes coronarios agudos
POLAR ACS: plataforma bio absorbible en síndromes coronarios agudos
 
ELISA 3: estrategia invasiva precoz vs tardía en pacientes sin supra desnivel...
ELISA 3: estrategia invasiva precoz vs tardía en pacientes sin supra desnivel...ELISA 3: estrategia invasiva precoz vs tardía en pacientes sin supra desnivel...
ELISA 3: estrategia invasiva precoz vs tardía en pacientes sin supra desnivel...
 
THRIVE: La niacina / laropiprant de liberación prolongada. Beneficio cardiova...
THRIVE: La niacina / laropiprant de liberación prolongada. Beneficio cardiova...THRIVE: La niacina / laropiprant de liberación prolongada. Beneficio cardiova...
THRIVE: La niacina / laropiprant de liberación prolongada. Beneficio cardiova...
 
RELAX: Inhibidor de la fosfodiesterasa-5. Insuficiencia cardiaca con función ...
RELAX: Inhibidor de la fosfodiesterasa-5. Insuficiencia cardiaca con función ...RELAX: Inhibidor de la fosfodiesterasa-5. Insuficiencia cardiaca con función ...
RELAX: Inhibidor de la fosfodiesterasa-5. Insuficiencia cardiaca con función ...
 
Reestenosis intrastent farmacológico con balón farmacológico
Reestenosis intrastent farmacológico con balón farmacológico Reestenosis intrastent farmacológico con balón farmacológico
Reestenosis intrastent farmacológico con balón farmacológico
 
Tromboaspiración: resistencia de la microcirculación
Tromboaspiración: resistencia de la microcirculaciónTromboaspiración: resistencia de la microcirculación
Tromboaspiración: resistencia de la microcirculación
 
Stent liberador de sirolimus vs everolimus en bifurcaciones
Stent liberador de sirolimus vs everolimus en bifurcacionesStent liberador de sirolimus vs everolimus en bifurcaciones
Stent liberador de sirolimus vs everolimus en bifurcaciones
 
¿Qué métodos han confirmado su eficacia para prevenir la nefropatía inducida ...
¿Qué métodos han confirmado su eficacia para prevenir la nefropatía inducida ...¿Qué métodos han confirmado su eficacia para prevenir la nefropatía inducida ...
¿Qué métodos han confirmado su eficacia para prevenir la nefropatía inducida ...
 
BVS for BTK
BVS for BTKBVS for BTK
BVS for BTK
 
Antiplaquetarios en el síndrome coronario agudo
Antiplaquetarios en el síndrome coronario agudoAntiplaquetarios en el síndrome coronario agudo
Antiplaquetarios en el síndrome coronario agudo
 
Polymer-Free DES
Polymer-Free DESPolymer-Free DES
Polymer-Free DES
 
Drug-Eluting Stents for Multivessel PCI
Drug-Eluting Stents for Multivessel PCIDrug-Eluting Stents for Multivessel PCI
Drug-Eluting Stents for Multivessel PCI
 
The Effect of Timing of Stem Cell Delivery Following Acute Myocardial Infarct...
The Effect of Timing of Stem Cell Delivery Following Acute Myocardial Infarct...The Effect of Timing of Stem Cell Delivery Following Acute Myocardial Infarct...
The Effect of Timing of Stem Cell Delivery Following Acute Myocardial Infarct...
 
Pilot Trial of Two Levels of Hypothermia in Comatose Survivors from Out-of-Ho...
Pilot Trial of Two Levels of Hypothermia in Comatose Survivors from Out-of-Ho...Pilot Trial of Two Levels of Hypothermia in Comatose Survivors from Out-of-Ho...
Pilot Trial of Two Levels of Hypothermia in Comatose Survivors from Out-of-Ho...
 
Off-pump versus in-pump CABG in high-risk patients
Off-pump versus in-pump CABG in high-risk patientsOff-pump versus in-pump CABG in high-risk patients
Off-pump versus in-pump CABG in high-risk patients
 
Posible beneficio de la esplerenona en pacientes con infarto agudo de miocard...
Posible beneficio de la esplerenona en pacientes con infarto agudo de miocard...Posible beneficio de la esplerenona en pacientes con infarto agudo de miocard...
Posible beneficio de la esplerenona en pacientes con infarto agudo de miocard...
 
Cangrelor compared with clopidogrel improves efficiency without increasing bl...
Cangrelor compared with clopidogrel improves efficiency without increasing bl...Cangrelor compared with clopidogrel improves efficiency without increasing bl...
Cangrelor compared with clopidogrel improves efficiency without increasing bl...
 

Cost-Effectiveness of PCI with Drug Eluting…

  • 1. Cost-Effectiveness of PCI with Drug Eluting Stents vs. Bypass Surgery for Patients with Diabetes and Multivessel CAD: Results from the FREEDOM Trial Elizabeth A. Magnuson, Valentin Fuster, Michael E. Farkouh, Kaijun Wang, Katherine Vilain, Haiyan Li, Jaime Appelwick, Victoria Muratov, Lynn A. Sleeper, Mouin Abdallah, David J. Cohen Saint Luke’s Mid America Heart Institute University of Missouri-Kansas City Kansas City, Missouri
  • 2. Disclosures • FREEDOM was supported by U01 grants #01HL071988 and #01HL092989 from the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute Other support  Drug eluting stents were provided by Cordis, Johnson and Johnson and Boston Scientific  Abciximab and an unrestricted research grant were provided by Eli Lilly and Company  Clopidogrel was provided by Sanofi Aventis and Bristol- Myers Squibb
  • 3. Background Time to Death/MI/Stroke PCI/DES 30 CABG Death/Stroke/MI, % Logrank P=0.005 20 PCI/DES CABG 10 5-Year Event Rates: 26.6% vs. 18.7% 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Years post-randomization
  • 4. Patient Flow 1900 patients randomized 947 assigned to 953 assigned to PCI CABG 36 no procedure 9 no procedure (withdrawn) (withdrawn) 911 underwent 944 underwent revascularization revascularization 893 initial 18 initial 939 initial 5 initial CABG PCI PCI CABG Median follow-up duration: 47 months
  • 5. Economic Study Analysis Plan Primary Endpoint: • Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained » Costs and QALYs were discounted at 3% annually General Approach – 2 Stages: • In-trial analysis based on observed survival, health state utility (EQ-5D), and costs derived from reported health care resource use during the trial period • Lifetime analysis based on projections of survival, quality-adjusted survival and costs beyond the trial period
  • 6. Costing Methods PCI and CABG Procedures: • Cath lab and CABG-related procedure costs based on measured resource utilization (procedure duration, balloons, stents, wires, etc.) and current unit costs DES cost = $1500/stent • Ancillary hospital costs based on regression models developed from 2010 MedPAR data for FREEDOM- eligible patients  Clinical events and complications rather than LOS were used as key predictors to avoid distortions due to marked differences in LOS across different countries/health care systems Additional costs: CV and non-CV rehospitalizations, MD fees, outpatient CV care/testing and medications, cardiac rehabilitation and nursing home stays
  • 7. Index Procedure Resource Use* CABG PCI PCI procedures 1 66.6% 2 30.9% 3-4 2.3% Drug-eluting stents 4.1 ± 1.9 Paclitaxel-eluting 45.6% Sirolimus-eluting 51.7% Other drug-eluting stents 2.7% Procedure duration (mins) 248 ± 78 107 ± 6.7 Total Procedure Cost $9,739 ± $2,453 $13,014 ± $5,173 * Per protocol population (includes planned staged procedures)
  • 8. Index Hospitalization Costs Δ = $8,622 (p<0.001)) $34,467 $25,845 * ITT population (includes planned staged procedures)
  • 9. 5-Year Follow-up Resource Utilization Rates per 100 person-years 20 P<0.001 P=0.52 15 10 P<0.001 17.2 14.6 12.8 10.8 5 6.8 3.3 0 1.7 0 PCI Procedures CABG Procedures CV Hospitalizations Non-CV Hospitalizations CABG PCI
  • 10. Annual and Cumulative Costs: Years 1- 5 Annual $25,000 Cumulative $70,000 $60,000 $20,000 Δ costs = $7878 $50,000 $15,000 Δ costs = $3641 $40,000 $30,000 $10,000 $20,000 $5,000 $10,000 $0 $0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 CABG Annual Cost PCI Annual Cost CABG Cumulative Cost PCI Cumulative Cost
  • 11. Annual Differences in Life Years and QALYs Time Since Δ Life Years Δ QALYs Randomization (CABG-PCI) (CABG-PCI) (Years) 1 -0.008 -0.033 2 -0.010 -0.034 3 -0.0006 -0.029 4 +0.015 -0.004 5 +0.053 +0.031
  • 12. Markov Model For the Projection of Post-Trial Life Years, QALYs and Costs • Monthly risk of death based on age, sex and race- matched data from US life tables calibrated to the observed 5 year mortality for the PCI population  CABG effect based on a landmark analysis for years 2-5: mortality hazard ratio for CABG vs. PCI = 0.60 • Base case: Gradual attenuation of CABG effect  Mortality hazard ratio increases from 0.60 to 1 in a linear fashion between 5 and 10 years; no impact of CABG beyond 10 years • Long-term costs and utility weights obtained from regression models developed from trial data
  • 13. In-Trial and Projected Survival 1 0.053 life years CABG 0.8 PCI 0.6 1.266 total life years Survival gained with CABG (0.794 when discounted at 3% annually) 0.4 0.2 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Years post-randomization
  • 14. Lifetime Cost-Effectiveness Results $20,000  Cost  Cost  QALY  QALY ∆Long-term Cost (CABG – PCI) $10,000 $0 Cost = $5392 ∆QALY = 0.663 years $8132/QALY gained with CABG -$10,000  Cost $50,000 per QALY  Cost  QALY  QALY -$20,000 -2 -1 0 1 2 ∆QALYs (CABG – PCI) Costs and QALYs discounted 3% annually
  • 15. Cost-Effectiveness of CABG vs. PCI Sensitivity Analysis – No CABG Effect Beyond 5 Yrs 1 No CABG Effect Years 5 - 10 0.754 total life years 0.8 gained with CABG (0.439 when discounted at 3% annually) 0.6 Survival 0.4 CABG PCI 0.2 Δ Costs $9,485 Δ QALYs 0.351 0 ICER $27,022 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Years post-randomization Pr < $50K/QALY= 82.4%
  • 16. Cost-Effectiveness of CABG vs. PCI SYNTAX Score Tertiles Low (<23) Mid (23-32) High (>32) $20,000 $10,000 $0 -$10,000 -$20,000 -2 -1 0 1 2 -2 -1 0 1 2 -2 -1 0 1 2 Δ Costs $8,784 Δ Costs $4,160 Δ Costs $973 Δ QALYs 0.407 Δ QALYs 0.997 Δ QALYs 0.315 ICER $21,582 ICER $4,172 ICER $3,088 Costs and QALYs discounted 3% annually
  • 17. Subgroups Prob. Subgroup Δ Costs Δ QALYs ICER < $50,000 Male (n=1328) $3,059 0.778 $3,932 99.8 Female (n=527) $9,249 0.510 $18,135 77.3 Age <60 (n=624) $11,190 1.160 $9,647 99.8 Age 60-69 (n=621) -$1,765 0.276 Dominant 80.5 Age ≥70 (n=610) $6,892 0.349 $19,748 71.9 US (n=351) $4,701 1.120 $4,197 98.1 Non-US (n=1504) $5,622 0.576 $9,760 96.5
  • 18. Summary (1) • CABG is associated with initial costs ≈ $9,000/patient higher than PCI • Partially offset by lower costs associated with repeat revascularization and to a lesser extent cardiac meds • At 5 years, CABG improved quality-adjusted life expectancy by ~ 0.03 years while increasing total costs by ~ $3,600/patient • Over a lifetime horizon, CABG associated with 0.66 QALYs gained and ~$5,400/patient higher costs yielding an ICER of $8,132/QALY gained
  • 19. Summary (2) • Results were robust to a broad range of sensitivity analyses regarding the duration of the CABG effect on both survival and costs • Results were also consistent across a wide range of subgroups
  • 20. Conclusions • For patients with diabetes and multivessel CAD, CABG provides not only better long- term clinical outcomes than DES-PCI but these benefits are achieved at an overall cost that represents an attractive use of societal health care resources • These findings provide additional support for existing guidelines that recommend CABG for diabetic patients with multivessel CAD