1. Brief Discussion About Medical Treatments
We are relentlessly inundated with marketing advice. However this consel does not emanate from
governing aurthorities the likes of the General Medical and Dental Councils.If a patient feels that she
was “done” in a flurry, in front of the judge, she will wax lyrical on how she was done in a hurry and felt
shortchanged. In medical Facial Injectables London included injectable based treatments by aesthetic
virtue.
Another misconception lies in the perception of the associated downtime. It is often accepted as true
that quick and simple equates to negligible pain thereafter or compromise on daily activities. A prime
example is the lip augmentation procedure, which rarely takes up more than twenty minutes of our
precious time. However, returning to work straight after would beg an interrogation and concern of
recent assault. And no, the boss would not approve of the swollen and bruised pout in the next
meeting, especially if orally incontinent and lisping post nerve block! I am still to see a micro needling
victim jumping into a cab heading straight back to the City after I’m done with her! Herein lies the
worth of the consultation, which very often, especially if it is the initial doctor patient chat can
effectively last longer than lunch time!So, it is certainly not a ‘ooh, just spotted this on the high street,
perhaps I’ll just nip in for a quick fix jab, fill and tox, and lo behold, my summer freeze!’ It might be
somewhat acceptable that a patient is in and out of the clinic in 30 minutes should the procedure in
question takes little time, the patient is not a novice to the treatment and the doctor is content that he
is comfortable carrying out the intervention given the patient’s condition and knowledge on the subject
matter.
Whereas straightforward brief procedures, such as a repeat toxin treatment or steroid injections for
London botox treatments might be well suited and indeed comfortably squeezed into the tea break, the
blatant unashamed marketing of more complex and lengthy procedures such as minimally invasive
breast augmentation or minimal access liposuction as lunch time contender, is a hoodwink. Truthfully,
the interventions are far less invasive and painful than their classical surgical counterparts. However,
there is no way a patient should or could return to the office following such surgery. So, in essence the
beauty brigade shouldn’t take this marketing moniker too far by applying it universally to the wide array
of procedures offered. Misleading a patient often means disappointing a patient, and an unhappy
patient tells twenty people. Happy patients on the other hand will only sing our praises to five souls.
Breeding a progeny of discontented and disgruntled patients is injurious to the doctor’s reputation, and
that of the profession in its entirety.
For more information click here: http://www.aesthetic-virtue.co.uk/