SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 77
Operations
             Management
               Chapter 9 –
               Layout Strategies

                             PowerPoint presentation to accompany
                             Heizer/Render
                             Principles of Operations Management, 7e
                             Operations Management, 9e
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                             9–1
Outline

                    Global Company Profile:
                     McDonald’s
                    The Strategic Importance of
                     Layout Decisions
                    Types of Layout
                    Office Layout


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                         9–2
Outline – Continued
               Retail Layout
                              Servicescapes
               Warehousing and Storage Layouts
                              Cross-Docking
                              Random Docking
                              Customizing
               Fixed-Position Layout

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                           9–3
Outline – Continued

                 Process-Oriented Layout
                    Computer Software for Process-
                     Oriented Layouts
                 Work Cells
                    Requirements of Work Cells
                    Staffing and Balancing Work Cells
                    The Focused Work Center and the
                     Focused Factory


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                               9–4
Outline – Continued

                    Repetitive and Product-Oriented
                     Layout
                              Assembly-Line Balancing




© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                               9–5
Learning Objectives
             When you complete this chapter you
             should be able to:

             1. Discuss important issues in office layout
             2. Define the objectives of retail layout
             3. Discuss modern warehouse management
                and terms such as ASRS, cross-docking,
                and random stocking
             4. Identify when fixed-position layouts are
                appropriate
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                  9–6
Learning Objectives
             When you complete this chapter, you
             should be able to:

              5. Explain how to achieve a good process-
                 oriented facility layout
              6. Define work cell and the requirements of
                 a work cell
              7. Define product-oriented layout
              8. Explain how to balance production flow
                 in a repetitive or product-oriented facility

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                      9–7
Innovations at McDonald’s
              Indoor seating (1950s)
              Drive-through window (1970s)
              Adding breakfast to the menu
               (1980s)
              Adding play areas (late 1980s)
              Redesign of the kitchens (1990s)
              Self-service kiosk (2004)
              Now three separate dining sections
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                          9–8
Innovations at McDonald’s
              Indoor seating (1950s)
              Drive-through window (1970s)
                                    Six out of the
              Adding breakfast to the menu
                                      seven are
               (1980s)
                                        layout
              Adding play areas (late 1980s)
                                     decisions!
              Redesign of the kitchens (1990s)
              Self-service kiosk (2004)
              Now three separate dining sections
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                           9–9
McDonald’s New Layout
                   Seventh major innovation
                   Redesigning all 30,000 outlets around
                    the world
                   Three separate dining areas
                              Linger zone with comfortable chairs and
                               Wi-Fi connections
                              Grab and go zone with tall counters
                              Flexible zone for kids and families
                   Facility layout is a source of
                    competitive advantage
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                               9 – 10
Strategic Importance of
                                Layout Decisions

                             The objective of layout strategy
                              is to develop a cost-effective
                               layout that will meet a firm’s
                                    competitive needs




© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                      9 – 11
Layout Design
                             Considerations
                Higher utilization of space, equipment,
                 and people
                Improved flow of information, materials,
                 or people
                Improved employee morale and safer
                 working conditions
                Improved customer/client interaction
                Flexibility

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                  9 – 12
Types of Layout
                             1. Office layout
                             2. Retail layout
                             3. Warehouse layout
                             4. Fixed-position layout
                             5. Process-oriented layout
                             6. Work-cell layout
                             7. Product-oriented layout
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                9 – 13
Types of Layout
            1. Office layout: Positions workers,
               their equipment, and spaces/offices
               to provide for movement of
               information
            2. Retail layout: Allocates shelf space
               and responds to customer behavior
            3. Warehouse layout: Addresses trade-
               offs between space and material
               handling
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                            9 – 14
Types of Layout
            4. Fixed-position layout: Addresses
               the layout requirements of large,
               bulky projects such as ships and
               buildings
            5. Process-oriented layout: Deals with
               low-volume, high-variety production
               (also called job shop or intermittent
               production)


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                             9 – 15
Types of Layout
            6. Work cell layout: Arranges
               machinery and equipment to focus
               on production of a single product or
               group of related products
            7. Product-oriented layout: Seeks the
               best personnel and machine
               utilizations in repetitive or
               continuous production


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                            9 – 16
Good Layouts Consider

                  1. Material handling equipment
                  2. Capacity and space requirements
                  3. Environment and aesthetics
                  4. Flows of information
                  5. Cost of moving between various
                     work areas


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                             9 – 17
Layout Strategies
                                                              Warehouse
                             Office         Retail             (storage)
                                          Examples
             Allstate Insurance       Kroger’s            Federal-Mogul’s
                                       Supermarket         warehouse
             Microsoft Corp.
                                      Walgreen’s          The Gap’s
                                                           distribution center
                                      Bloomingdale’s
                                        Problems/Issues
             Locate workers           Expose customer     Balance low-cost
             requiring frequent       to high-margin      storage with low-
             contact close to         items               cost material
             one another                                  handling


        Table 9.1
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                       9 – 18
Layout Strategies
                                      Project              Job Shop
                                  (fixed position)     (process oriented)
                                         Examples
                             Ingall Ship Building    Arnold Palmer Hospital
                              Corp.
                                                     Hard Rock Café
                             Trump Plaza
                                                     Olive Garden
                             Pittsburgh Airport

                                  Problems/Issues
                             Move material to the    Manage varied material
                             limited storage areas   flow for each product
                             around the site


        Table 9.1
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                    9 – 19
Layout Strategies
                                   Work Cells        Repetitive/ Continuous
                                (product families)     (product oriented)
                                   Examples
                             Hallmark Cards          Sony’s TV assembly
                                                      line
                             Wheeled Coach
                                                     Toyota Scion
                             Standard Aero
                                 Problems/Issues
                             Identify a product      Equalize the task time
                             family, build teams,    at each workstation
                             cross train team
                             members



        Table 9.1
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                    9 – 20
Office Layout
           Grouping of workers, their equipment,
            and spaces to provide comfort,
            safety, and movement of information
           Movement of
            information is main
            distinction
           Typically in state of
            flux due to frequent
            technological
            changes
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                      9 – 21
Relationship Chart




                                                  Figure 9.1

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                     9 – 22
Supermarket Retail Layout

                    Objective is to maximize
                     profitability per square foot of
                     floor space
                    Sales and profitability vary
                     directly with customer exposure




© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                              9 – 23
Five Helpful Ideas for
                             Supermarket Layout
             1. Locate high-draw items around the
                periphery of the store
             2. Use prominent locations for high-impulse
                and high-margin items
             3. Distribute power items to both sides of
                an aisle and disperse them to increase
                viewing of other items
             4. Use end-aisle locations
             5. Convey mission of store through careful
                positioning of lead-off department
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                 9 – 24
Store Layout




                         Figure 9.2

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                           9 – 25
Retail Slotting
             Manufacturers pay fees to retailers
              to get the retailers to display (slot)
              their product
             Contributing factors
                              Limited shelf space
                              An increasing number of new
                               products
                              Better information about sales
                               through POS data collection
                              Closer control of inventory
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                      9 – 26
Retail Store Shelf Space
                               Planogram
                                                                                                                             5 facings
             Computerized
              tool for shelf-



                                   Shampoo


                                                           Shampoo


                                                                                   Shampoo


                                                                                                Shampoo


                                                                                                              Shampoo
              space
              management
             Generated from
              store’s scanner




                                                                                                                              Conditioner
                                                                                      Shampoo

                                                                                                    Shampoo

                                                                                                                   Shampoo



                                                                                                                                            Shampoo
              data on sales                  Conditioner

                                                                     Conditioner
             Often supplied
              by manufacturer
                                                                                                2 ft.
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                                                                            9 – 27
Servicescapes
              Ambient conditions - background
               characteristics such as lighting, sound,
               smell, and temperature
              Spatial layout and functionality - which
               involve customer
               circulation path planning,
               aisle characteristics, and
               product grouping
              Signs, symbols, and
               artifacts - characteristics
               of building design that
               carry social significance
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                9 – 28
Warehousing and Storage
                           Layouts
                Objective is to optimize trade-offs
                 between handling costs and costs
                 associated with warehouse space
                Maximize the total “cube” of the
                 warehouse – utilize its full volume
                 while maintaining low material
                 handling costs


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                             9 – 29
Warehousing and Storage
                           Layouts
            Material Handling Costs
               All costs associated with the transaction
                              Incoming transport
                              Storage
                              Finding and moving material
                              Outgoing transport
                              Equipment, people, material, supervision,
                               insurance, depreciation
               Minimize damage and spoilage
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                 9 – 30
Warehousing and Storage
                           Layouts
               Warehouse density tends to vary
                inversely with the number of different
                items stored
               Automated Storage and
                Retrieval Systems (ASRSs)
                can significantly improve
                warehouse productivity by
                an estimated 500%
               Dock location is a key
                design element
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                               9 – 31
Cross-Docking
                Materials are moved directly from
                 receiving to shipping and are not
                 placed in storage
                 in the warehouse
                Requires tight
                 scheduling and
                 accurate shipments,
                 bar code or RFID
                 identification used for
                 advanced shipment
                 notification as materials
                 are unloaded
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                           9 – 32
Random Stocking
             Typically requires automatic identification
              systems (AISs) and effective information
              systems
             Random assignment of stocking locations
              allows more efficient use of space
             Key tasks
                         1. Maintain list of open locations
                         2. Maintain accurate records
                         3. Sequence items to minimize travel, pick time
                         4. Combine picking orders
                         5. Assign classes of items to particular areas
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                 9 – 33
Customizing
             Value-added activities performed at
              the warehouse
             Enable low cost and rapid response
              strategies
                      Assembly of components
                      Loading software
                      Repairs
                      Customized labeling and packaging

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                 9 – 34
Warehouse Layout
            Traditional Layout
                                                          Storage racks
                             Customization




                                                             Conveyor

                                              Staging
                                                                            Office
                                             Shipping and receiving docks
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                           9 – 35
Warehouse Layout
            Cross-Docking Layout


                               Shipping and receiving docks




                                                              Office
                               Shipping and receiving docks



© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                             9 – 36
Fixed-Position Layout
           Product remains in one place
           Workers and equipment come to site
           Complicating factors
                        Limited space at site
                        Different materials
                         required at different
                         stages of the project
                        Volume of materials
                         needed is dynamic
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                           9 – 37
Alternative Strategy
              As much of the project as possible
               is completed off-site in a product-
               oriented facility
              This can
               significantly
               improve efficiency
               but is only
               possible when
               multiple similar
               units need to be created
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                           9 – 38
Process-Oriented Layout

                 Like machines and equipment are
                  grouped together
                 Flexible and capable of handling a
                  wide variety of products or
                  services
                 Scheduling can be difficult and
                  setup, material handling, and
                  labor costs can be high

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                             9 – 39
Process-Oriented Layout
                                                   Patient A - broken leg
                                     ER
                                   triage    Emergency room admissions
                                   room
                                                   Patient B - erratic heart
                    Surgery                                    pacemaker


                                            Laboratories




                    Radiology   ER Beds      Pharmacy          Billing/exit



                                                                   Figure 9.3
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                      9 – 40
Layout at Arnold Palmer Hospital

                                               Pie-shaped
                 Central break                   rooms
                  and medical
                 supply rooms


             Local linen                       Central nurses
               supply                             station




                                    Local
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
                                 nursing pod                    9 – 41
Process-Oriented Layout

                 Arrange work centers so as to
                  minimize the costs of material
                  handling
                 Basic cost elements are
                              Number of loads (or people) moving
                               between centers
                              Distance loads (or people) move
                               between centers

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                          9 – 42
Process-Oriented Layout
                                                n   n

                             Minimize cost = ∑ ∑ Xij Cij
                                               i=1 j=1


                   where            n =       total number of work
                                    centers or departments
                                    i, j =    individual
                                    departments
                                    Xij =     number of loads
                                    moved from department i to
                                    department j
                                    Cij =     cost to move a load
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.          between department i and         9 – 43
Process Layout Example
                   Arrange six departments in a factory to
                   minimize the material handling costs.
                   Each department is 20 x 20 feet and the
                   building is 60 feet long and 40 feet wide.
                             1. Construct a “from-to matrix”
                             2. Determine the space requirements
                             3. Develop an initial schematic diagram
                             4. Determine the cost of this layout
                             5. Try to improve the layout
                             6. Prepare a detailed plan
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                             9 – 44
Process Layout Example
                                             Number of loads per week
                 Department Assembly Painting     Machine Receiving   Shipping     Testing
                               (1)     (2)        Shop (3)   (4)         (5)         (6)

              Assembly (1)              50         100        0          0           20

                  Painting (2)                      30       50         10            0

      Machine Shop (3)                                       20          0          100

              Receiving (4)                                             50            0

                Shipping (5)                                                          0

                   Testing (6)


                                                                                 Figure 9.4

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                9 – 45
Process Layout Example
                               Area 1       Area 2        Area 3



                              Assembly     Painting    Machine Shop
                             Department   Department    Department
                                 (1)          (2)           (3)


                                                                      40’


                              Receiving    Shipping     Testing
                             Department   Department   Department
                                 (4)          (5)          (6)



    Figure 9.5                 Area 4       Area 5        Area 6
                                              60’
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                  9 – 46
Process Layout Example
             Interdepartmental Flow Graph
                                       100



                              50              30
                  1                    2                        3
                                  20         20
                                        10
                             50                                     100


                  4                    5                        6
                              50
                                                   Figure 9.6
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                9 – 47
Process Layout Example
                                                n   n

                                      Cost = ∑ ∑ Xij Cij
                                               i=1 j=1

                         Cost =          $50    + $200 +      $40
                                      (1 and 2)  (1 and 3) (1 and 6)
                                  +      $30    +    $50    +    $10
                                      (2 and 3)   (2 and 4)   (2 and 5)
                                  +      $40    + $100 +      $50
                                      (3 and 4)  (3 and 6) (4 and 5)

                             = $570

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                9 – 48
Process Layout Example
             Revised Interdepartmental Flow Graph
                                        30



                             50              100
                  2                     1                        3

                             10
                      50               20          50                100


                                  50
                  4                     5                        6

                                                    Figure 9.7
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                 9 – 49
Process Layout Example
                                                n   n

                                      Cost = ∑ ∑ Xij Cij
                                               i=1 j=1

                         Cost =          $50    + $100 +      $20
                                      (1 and 2)  (1 and 3) (1 and 6)
                                  +      $60    +    $50    +    $10
                                      (2 and 3)   (2 and 4)   (2 and 5)
                                  +      $40    + $100 +      $50
                                      (3 and 4)  (3 and 6) (4 and 5)

                             = $480

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                9 – 50
Process Layout Example
                               Area 1       Area 2        Area 3



                              Painting     Assembly    Machine Shop
                             Department   Department    Department
                                 (2)          (1)           (3)


                                                                      40’


                              Receiving    Shipping     Testing
                             Department   Department   Department
                                 (4)          (5)          (6)



    Figure 9.8                 Area 4       Area 5        Area 6
                                              60’
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                  9 – 51
Computer Software
              Graphical approach only works for
               small problems
              Computer programs are available to
               solve bigger problems
                              CRAFT
                              ALDEP
                              CORELAP
                              Factory Flow

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                          9 – 52
CRAFT Example
                               PATTERN                           PATTERN
                        1    2  3   4  5       6           1   2  3   4  5       6

                1       A    A   A     A   B   B     1    D    D   D     D   B   B

                2       A    A   A     A   B   B     2    D    D   D     D   B   B

                3       D    D   D     D   D   D     3    D    D   D     E   E   E

                4       C    C   D     D   D   D     4    C    C   D     E   E   F

                5       F    F   F     F   F   D     5    A    A   A     A   A   F

                6       E    E   E     E   E   D     6    A    A   A     F   F   F




                    TOTAL COST    20,100                 TOTAL COST    14,390
                    EST. COST REDUCTION        .00       EST. COST REDUCTION     70.
                    ITERATION   0                        ITERATION   3

                                     (a)                               (b)       Figure 9.9
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                             9 – 53
Computer Software
         Three dimensional visualization
          software allows managers to view
          possible layouts and assess process,
          material
          handling,
          efficiency,
          and safety
          issues


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                       9 – 54
Work Cells
               Reorganizes people and machines
                into groups to focus on single
                products or product groups
               Group technology identifies
                products that have similar
                characteristics for particular cells
               Volume must justify cells
               Cells can be reconfigured as
                designs or volume changes
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                             9 – 55
Advantages of Work Cells
                    1. Reduced work-in-process inventory
                    2. Less floor space required
                    3. Reduced raw material and finished
                       goods inventory
                    4. Reduced direct labor
                    5. Heightened sense of employee
                       participation
                    6. Increased use of equipment and
                       machinery
                    7. Reduced investment in machinery
                       and equipment
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                 9 – 56
Improving Layouts Using
                           Work Cells



                        Current layout - workers in
                        small closed areas.
                        Cannot increase output
                        without a third worker and
                        third set of equipment.       Improved layout - cross-trained
                                                      workers can assist each other.
                                                      May be able to add a third worker
                                                      as additional output is needed.

         Figure 9.10 (a)

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                9 – 57
Improving Layouts Using
                           Work Cells



                        Current layout - straight
                        lines make it hard to balance       Improved layout - in U
                        tasks because work may not          shape, workers have better
                        be divided evenly                   access. Four cross-trained
                                                            workers were reduced.


                                          U-shaped line may reduce employee movement
                                          and space requirements while enhancing
                                          communication, reducing the number of
         Figure 9.10 (b)                  workers, and facilitating inspection
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                               9 – 58
Requirements of Work Cells

              1. Identification of families of
                 products
              2. A high level of training, flexibility
                 and empowerment of employees
              3. Being self-contained, with its own
                 equipment and resources
              4. Test (poka-yoke) at each station in
                 the cell
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                               9 – 59
Staffing and Balancing
                                    Work Cells
             Determine the takt time

                                          Total work time available
                              Takt time =
                                                Units required

             Determine the number
             of operators required

                                    Total operation time required
                 Workers required =
                                              Takt time

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                            9 – 60
Staffing Work Cells Example
           600 Mirrors per day required
           Mirror production scheduled for 8 hours per day
           From a work balance chart 60
                 total operation time 50
                   = 140 seconds


                                    Standard time required
                                        40

                                                             30

                                                             20

                                                             10

                                                             0



                                                                  Assemble Paint   Test   Label Pack for
                                                                                                shipment
                                                                               Operations
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                                          9 – 61
Staffing Work Cells Example
           600 Mirrors per day required
           Mirror production scheduled for 8 hours per day
           From a work balance chart
                 total operation time
                   = 140 seconds

                             Takt time = (8 hrs x 60 mins) / 600 units
                                       = .8 mins = 48 seconds

                                   Total operation time required
                Workers required =
                                             Takt time
                                           = 140 / 48 = 2.91
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                               9 – 62
Work Balance Charts
                Used for evaluating operation
                 times in work cells
                Can help identify bottleneck
                 operations
                Flexible, cross-trained employees
                 can help address labor bottlenecks
                Machine bottlenecks may require
                 other approaches

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                            9 – 63
Focused Work Center and
                       Focused Factory
             Focused Work Center
                              Identify a large family of similar products
                               that have a large and stable demand
                              Moves production from a general-purpose,
                               process-oriented facility to a large work cell
             Focused Factory
                              A focused work cell in a separate facility
                              May be focused by product line, layout,
                               quality, new product introduction, flexibility,
                               or other requirements
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                       9 – 64
Focused Work Center and
                       Focused Factory
             Work Cell                 Focused Work Center       Focused Factory

             A work cell is a          A focused work center is A focused factory is a
               temporary product-        a permanent product-     permanent facility to
               oriented arrangement      oriented arrangement     produce a product or
               of machines and           of machines and          component in a
               personnel in what is      personnel in what is     product-oriented
               ordinarily a process-     ordinarily a process-    facility. Many focused
               oriented facility.        oriented facility.       factories currently
                                                                  being built were
                                                                  originally part of a
                                                                  process-oriented
                                                                  facility.

             Example: A job shop    Example: Pipe bracket        Example: A plant to
              with machinery and     manufacturing at a           produce window
              personnel rearranged   shipyard.                    mechanism for
              to produce 300 unique                               automobiles.
              control panels.


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.
                                                                               Table 9.2   9 – 65
Repetitive and Product-
                                Oriented Layout
            Organized around products or families of
            similar high-volume, low-variety products
             1. Volume is adequate for high equipment
                utilization
             2. Product demand is stable enough to justify high
                investment in specialized equipment
             3. Product is standardized or approaching a phase
                of life cycle that justifies investment
             4. Supplies of raw materials and components are
                adequate and of uniform quality
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                        9 – 66
Product-Oriented Layouts
              Fabrication line
                  Builds components on a series of machines
                  Machine-paced
                  Require mechanical or engineering changes
                   to balance
              Assembly line
                  Puts fabricated parts together at a series of
                   workstations
                  Paced by work tasks
                  Balanced by moving tasks
             Both types of lines must be balanced so that the
             time to perform the work at each station is the same
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                          9 – 67
Product-Oriented Layouts
                 Advantages
                             1.   Low variable cost per unit
                             2.   Low material handling costs
                             3.   Reduced work-in-process inventories
                             4.   Easier training and supervision
                             5.   Rapid throughput
                Disadvantages
                             1. High volume is required
                             2. Work stoppage at any point ties up the
                                whole operation
                             3. Lack of flexibility in product or production
                                rates
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                     9 – 68
McDonald’s Assembly Line




                                     Figure 9.12

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                    9 – 69
Disassembly Lines
         • Disassembly is being considered in
           new product designs
         • “Green” issues and recycling
           standards are important consideration
         • Automotive
           disassembly is
           the 16th largest
           industry in
           the US
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                         9 – 70
Assembly-Line Balancing
            Objective is to minimize the imbalance
             between machines or personnel while
             meeting required output
            Starts with the precedence
             relationships
                        1. Determine cycle time
                        2. Calculate theoretical
                           minimum number of
                           workstations
                        3. Balance the line by
                           assigning specific
                           tasks to workstations
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                            9 – 71
Wing Component Example
                Performance Task Must Follow
                     Time     Task Listed
          Task    (minutes)      Below
           A          10           —
           B          11           A           This means that
           C           5           B           tasks B and E
                                               cannot be done
           D           4           B           until task A has
           E          12           A           been completed
           F           3          C, D
           G           7           F
           H          11           E
            I          3          G, H
            Total time 66



© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                        9 – 72
Wing Component Example
                Performance Task Must Follow
                     Time     Task Listed
          Task    (minutes)      Below
           A          10           —
           B          11           A
           C           5           B
           D           4           B
           E          12           A
           F           3          C, D               5

           G           7           F      10   11
                                                     C
                                                         3         7
           H          11           E
                                          A    B         F        G
            I          3          G, H               4
                                                                       3
            Total time 66                       12
                                                     D
                                                         11            I
                                                E        H

                                                             Figure 9.13
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                 9 – 73
Wing Component Example
                Performance Task Must Follow            480 available
                     Time     Task Listed                     mins per day
          Task    (minutes)      Below                  40 units required
           A          10           —
           B          11            A             Production time
           C           5            B             available per day
           D           4       Cycle time = Units required per day
                                    B
           E          12            A       = 480 / 40
           F           3          C, D                   5
                                            = 12 minutes per unit
           G           7            F      10     11
                                                         C
                                                                3    7
                                                n
           H          11            E
            I          3        Minimum A i∑1Time for taskF
                                  G, H          =
                                                   B
                                                         4
                                                                 i   G
                               number of =                               3
            Total time 66     workstations         Cycle D
                                                         time
                                                    12           11      I
                                            = 66 / 12
                                                    E             H
                                            = 5.5 or 6 stations
                                                               Figure 9.13
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                   9 – 74
WingLine-Balancing Heuristics
                              Component Example
              1. Longest task time     Choose the available task
                                                          480 available
                 Performance Task Must Followlongest task time
                                       with the
                      Time        Task Listed                  mins per day
          Task Most following tasksBelow
              2. (minutes)             Choose the available task required
                                                          40 units
           A           10             —with the largestCycle time = 12 mins
                                                        number of
           B           11             Afollowing tasks
                                                       Minimum
           C 3. Ranked positional
                        5             B              workstations for or 6
                                       Choose the available task
                                                                     = 5.5
           D     weight4              Bwhich the sum of following
           E           12             Atask times is the longest
           F            3            C, D                  5

           G 4. Shortest task time
                        7             FChoose the available task
                                                          C
                                       with the
                                              10 shortest task time
                                                    11           3       7
           H           11             E
                                              A     B            F      G
            I 5. Least number of
                        3            G,Choose the available task
                                        H                  4
                                                                           3
            Total time 66 tasks
                 following             with the least number of
                                                          D                I
                                       following tasks
                                                     12           11
                                                     E          H
                                                               Table 9.4
                                                                 Figure 9.13
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                     9 – 75
Wing Component Example
                   Performance Task Must Follow       480 available
                       Time       Task Listed              mins per day
          Task       (minutes)      Below             40 units required
           A             10            —            Cycle time = 12 mins
           B             11            A           Minimum
                       Station
                                                  workstations = 5.5 or 6
                                    5 B
           C              5
                          2
           D              4         C B
           E 10           11
                         12            A        3         7
           F A            B
                          3           C, D      F        G
                                    4                                3
           G              7            F
           H             11         D E Station 3                    I
            I             3    12     G, H        11
                                                             Station 6
            Total time 66
              Station
                 1             E                  H
                             Station             Station
                                4                   5          Figure 9.14

© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                   9 – 76
Wing Component Example
               Performance Task Must Follow               480 available
                    Time         Task Listed                   mins per day
        Task     (minutes)           Below                40 units required
          A          10                —                Cycle time = 12 mins
          B          11                A               Minimum
          C            5               B             workstations = 5.5 or 6
          D            4               B
          E          12                A
          F            3              C, D
          G            7               F ∑ Task times
        Efficiency =
          H           (Actual number of workstations) x (Largest cycle time)
                     11                E
           I           3              G, H
                   = 66 minutes / (6 stations) x (12 minutes)
           Total time 66
                   = 91.7%


© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc.                                                9 – 77

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Heizer 07
Heizer 07Heizer 07
Heizer 07
 
Heizer om10 ch08
Heizer om10 ch08Heizer om10 ch08
Heizer om10 ch08
 
Heizer supp 06
Heizer supp 06Heizer supp 06
Heizer supp 06
 
Heizer 11
Heizer 11Heizer 11
Heizer 11
 
Heizer 13
Heizer 13Heizer 13
Heizer 13
 
Heizer 03
Heizer 03Heizer 03
Heizer 03
 
Heizer 15
Heizer 15Heizer 15
Heizer 15
 
Heizer supp 07
Heizer supp 07Heizer supp 07
Heizer supp 07
 
Heizer 16
Heizer 16Heizer 16
Heizer 16
 
Heizer mod b
Heizer mod bHeizer mod b
Heizer mod b
 
Heizer mod a
Heizer mod aHeizer mod a
Heizer mod a
 
Heizer 11
Heizer 11Heizer 11
Heizer 11
 
Heizer 17
Heizer 17Heizer 17
Heizer 17
 
Heizer mod e
Heizer mod eHeizer mod e
Heizer mod e
 
Heizer om10 ch12
Heizer om10 ch12Heizer om10 ch12
Heizer om10 ch12
 
Heizer om10 ch11
Heizer om10 ch11Heizer om10 ch11
Heizer om10 ch11
 
Heizer mod c
Heizer mod cHeizer mod c
Heizer mod c
 
Chapter 10 Human Resources and Job Design.ppt
Chapter 10 Human Resources and Job Design.pptChapter 10 Human Resources and Job Design.ppt
Chapter 10 Human Resources and Job Design.ppt
 
Chapter 8 Location Strategy.ppt
Chapter 8 Location Strategy.pptChapter 8 Location Strategy.ppt
Chapter 8 Location Strategy.ppt
 
Chapter 6 Managing Quality.ppt
Chapter 6 Managing Quality.pptChapter 6 Managing Quality.ppt
Chapter 6 Managing Quality.ppt
 

Similar to Heizer 09

layout-strategy. Credits to the owner pl
layout-strategy. Credits to the owner  pllayout-strategy. Credits to the owner  pl
layout-strategy. Credits to the owner plMonicaTeofilo
 
Heizer om10 ch09
Heizer om10 ch09Heizer om10 ch09
Heizer om10 ch09ryaekle
 
Process layout
Process layoutProcess layout
Process layoutno
 
Production & operation
Production & operationProduction & operation
Production & operationDiksha Rana
 
Understanding Content Component Management
Understanding Content Component ManagementUnderstanding Content Component Management
Understanding Content Component ManagementScott Abel
 
Astute oracle i participate webinar series - v1
Astute   oracle i participate webinar series - v1Astute   oracle i participate webinar series - v1
Astute oracle i participate webinar series - v1Arvind Rajan
 
Heizer om10 ch07-process startegy
Heizer om10 ch07-process startegyHeizer om10 ch07-process startegy
Heizer om10 ch07-process startegyRozaimi Mohd Saad
 

Similar to Heizer 09 (20)

Chapter 9 layout strategies
Chapter 9 layout strategiesChapter 9 layout strategies
Chapter 9 layout strategies
 
Heizer om10 ch09-layout
Heizer om10 ch09-layoutHeizer om10 ch09-layout
Heizer om10 ch09-layout
 
layout strategy.ppt
layout strategy.pptlayout strategy.ppt
layout strategy.ppt
 
layout-strategy. Credits to the owner pl
layout-strategy. Credits to the owner  pllayout-strategy. Credits to the owner  pl
layout-strategy. Credits to the owner pl
 
Heizer om10 ch09
Heizer om10 ch09Heizer om10 ch09
Heizer om10 ch09
 
Layout.ppt
Layout.pptLayout.ppt
Layout.ppt
 
Process layout
Process layoutProcess layout
Process layout
 
Heizer om10 ch12-inventory
Heizer om10 ch12-inventoryHeizer om10 ch12-inventory
Heizer om10 ch12-inventory
 
Production & operation
Production & operationProduction & operation
Production & operation
 
Chap006
Chap006Chap006
Chap006
 
Understanding Content Component Management
Understanding Content Component ManagementUnderstanding Content Component Management
Understanding Content Component Management
 
Chapter 09 layout_strategies
Chapter 09 layout_strategiesChapter 09 layout_strategies
Chapter 09 layout_strategies
 
Facility layout
Facility layoutFacility layout
Facility layout
 
Int operation strategy
Int operation strategyInt operation strategy
Int operation strategy
 
Heizer om10 ch08-location
Heizer om10 ch08-locationHeizer om10 ch08-location
Heizer om10 ch08-location
 
PLABAN MISHRA
PLABAN MISHRAPLABAN MISHRA
PLABAN MISHRA
 
Ch07
Ch07Ch07
Ch07
 
2009-dec-10 Architectuur en HL7
2009-dec-10 Architectuur en HL72009-dec-10 Architectuur en HL7
2009-dec-10 Architectuur en HL7
 
Astute oracle i participate webinar series - v1
Astute   oracle i participate webinar series - v1Astute   oracle i participate webinar series - v1
Astute oracle i participate webinar series - v1
 
Heizer om10 ch07-process startegy
Heizer om10 ch07-process startegyHeizer om10 ch07-process startegy
Heizer om10 ch07-process startegy
 

More from Rizwan Khurram

Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.
Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.
Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 11
Information Technology Project Management - part 11Information Technology Project Management - part 11
Information Technology Project Management - part 11Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 10
Information Technology Project Management - part 10Information Technology Project Management - part 10
Information Technology Project Management - part 10Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 09
Information Technology Project Management - part 09Information Technology Project Management - part 09
Information Technology Project Management - part 09Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 08
Information Technology Project Management - part  08Information Technology Project Management - part  08
Information Technology Project Management - part 08Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 07
Information Technology Project Management - part 07Information Technology Project Management - part 07
Information Technology Project Management - part 07Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 05
Information Technology Project Management - part 05Information Technology Project Management - part 05
Information Technology Project Management - part 05Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 04
Information Technology Project Management - part 04Information Technology Project Management - part 04
Information Technology Project Management - part 04Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 02
Information Technology Project Management - part 02Information Technology Project Management - part 02
Information Technology Project Management - part 02Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 01
Information Technology Project Management - part 01Information Technology Project Management - part 01
Information Technology Project Management - part 01Rizwan Khurram
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 12
Information Technology Project Management - part 12Information Technology Project Management - part 12
Information Technology Project Management - part 12Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Rizwan Khurram
 
Total employee involvement
Total employee involvementTotal employee involvement
Total employee involvementRizwan Khurram
 

More from Rizwan Khurram (20)

Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.
Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.
Exploring the risk factors associated with peb projects in lahore.
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 11
Information Technology Project Management - part 11Information Technology Project Management - part 11
Information Technology Project Management - part 11
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 10
Information Technology Project Management - part 10Information Technology Project Management - part 10
Information Technology Project Management - part 10
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 09
Information Technology Project Management - part 09Information Technology Project Management - part 09
Information Technology Project Management - part 09
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 08
Information Technology Project Management - part  08Information Technology Project Management - part  08
Information Technology Project Management - part 08
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 07
Information Technology Project Management - part 07Information Technology Project Management - part 07
Information Technology Project Management - part 07
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 05
Information Technology Project Management - part 05Information Technology Project Management - part 05
Information Technology Project Management - part 05
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 04
Information Technology Project Management - part 04Information Technology Project Management - part 04
Information Technology Project Management - part 04
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 02
Information Technology Project Management - part 02Information Technology Project Management - part 02
Information Technology Project Management - part 02
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 01
Information Technology Project Management - part 01Information Technology Project Management - part 01
Information Technology Project Management - part 01
 
Information Technology Project Management - part 12
Information Technology Project Management - part 12Information Technology Project Management - part 12
Information Technology Project Management - part 12
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management Strategic Delivery of Change Management
Strategic Delivery of Change Management
 
Vision and mission
Vision and missionVision and mission
Vision and mission
 
Total employee involvement
Total employee involvementTotal employee involvement
Total employee involvement
 

Heizer 09

  • 1. Operations Management Chapter 9 – Layout Strategies PowerPoint presentation to accompany Heizer/Render Principles of Operations Management, 7e Operations Management, 9e © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9–1
  • 2. Outline  Global Company Profile: McDonald’s  The Strategic Importance of Layout Decisions  Types of Layout  Office Layout © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9–2
  • 3. Outline – Continued  Retail Layout  Servicescapes  Warehousing and Storage Layouts  Cross-Docking  Random Docking  Customizing  Fixed-Position Layout © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9–3
  • 4. Outline – Continued  Process-Oriented Layout  Computer Software for Process- Oriented Layouts  Work Cells  Requirements of Work Cells  Staffing and Balancing Work Cells  The Focused Work Center and the Focused Factory © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9–4
  • 5. Outline – Continued  Repetitive and Product-Oriented Layout  Assembly-Line Balancing © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9–5
  • 6. Learning Objectives When you complete this chapter you should be able to: 1. Discuss important issues in office layout 2. Define the objectives of retail layout 3. Discuss modern warehouse management and terms such as ASRS, cross-docking, and random stocking 4. Identify when fixed-position layouts are appropriate © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9–6
  • 7. Learning Objectives When you complete this chapter, you should be able to: 5. Explain how to achieve a good process- oriented facility layout 6. Define work cell and the requirements of a work cell 7. Define product-oriented layout 8. Explain how to balance production flow in a repetitive or product-oriented facility © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9–7
  • 8. Innovations at McDonald’s  Indoor seating (1950s)  Drive-through window (1970s)  Adding breakfast to the menu (1980s)  Adding play areas (late 1980s)  Redesign of the kitchens (1990s)  Self-service kiosk (2004)  Now three separate dining sections © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9–8
  • 9. Innovations at McDonald’s  Indoor seating (1950s)  Drive-through window (1970s) Six out of the  Adding breakfast to the menu seven are (1980s) layout  Adding play areas (late 1980s) decisions!  Redesign of the kitchens (1990s)  Self-service kiosk (2004)  Now three separate dining sections © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9–9
  • 10. McDonald’s New Layout  Seventh major innovation  Redesigning all 30,000 outlets around the world  Three separate dining areas  Linger zone with comfortable chairs and Wi-Fi connections  Grab and go zone with tall counters  Flexible zone for kids and families  Facility layout is a source of competitive advantage © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 10
  • 11. Strategic Importance of Layout Decisions The objective of layout strategy is to develop a cost-effective layout that will meet a firm’s competitive needs © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 11
  • 12. Layout Design Considerations  Higher utilization of space, equipment, and people  Improved flow of information, materials, or people  Improved employee morale and safer working conditions  Improved customer/client interaction  Flexibility © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 12
  • 13. Types of Layout 1. Office layout 2. Retail layout 3. Warehouse layout 4. Fixed-position layout 5. Process-oriented layout 6. Work-cell layout 7. Product-oriented layout © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 13
  • 14. Types of Layout 1. Office layout: Positions workers, their equipment, and spaces/offices to provide for movement of information 2. Retail layout: Allocates shelf space and responds to customer behavior 3. Warehouse layout: Addresses trade- offs between space and material handling © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 14
  • 15. Types of Layout 4. Fixed-position layout: Addresses the layout requirements of large, bulky projects such as ships and buildings 5. Process-oriented layout: Deals with low-volume, high-variety production (also called job shop or intermittent production) © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 15
  • 16. Types of Layout 6. Work cell layout: Arranges machinery and equipment to focus on production of a single product or group of related products 7. Product-oriented layout: Seeks the best personnel and machine utilizations in repetitive or continuous production © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 16
  • 17. Good Layouts Consider 1. Material handling equipment 2. Capacity and space requirements 3. Environment and aesthetics 4. Flows of information 5. Cost of moving between various work areas © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 17
  • 18. Layout Strategies Warehouse Office Retail (storage) Examples Allstate Insurance Kroger’s Federal-Mogul’s Supermarket warehouse Microsoft Corp. Walgreen’s The Gap’s distribution center Bloomingdale’s Problems/Issues Locate workers Expose customer Balance low-cost requiring frequent to high-margin storage with low- contact close to items cost material one another handling Table 9.1 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 18
  • 19. Layout Strategies Project Job Shop (fixed position) (process oriented) Examples Ingall Ship Building Arnold Palmer Hospital Corp. Hard Rock Café Trump Plaza Olive Garden Pittsburgh Airport Problems/Issues Move material to the Manage varied material limited storage areas flow for each product around the site Table 9.1 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 19
  • 20. Layout Strategies Work Cells Repetitive/ Continuous (product families) (product oriented) Examples Hallmark Cards Sony’s TV assembly line Wheeled Coach Toyota Scion Standard Aero Problems/Issues Identify a product Equalize the task time family, build teams, at each workstation cross train team members Table 9.1 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 20
  • 21. Office Layout  Grouping of workers, their equipment, and spaces to provide comfort, safety, and movement of information  Movement of information is main distinction  Typically in state of flux due to frequent technological changes © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 21
  • 22. Relationship Chart Figure 9.1 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 22
  • 23. Supermarket Retail Layout  Objective is to maximize profitability per square foot of floor space  Sales and profitability vary directly with customer exposure © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 23
  • 24. Five Helpful Ideas for Supermarket Layout 1. Locate high-draw items around the periphery of the store 2. Use prominent locations for high-impulse and high-margin items 3. Distribute power items to both sides of an aisle and disperse them to increase viewing of other items 4. Use end-aisle locations 5. Convey mission of store through careful positioning of lead-off department © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 24
  • 25. Store Layout Figure 9.2 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 25
  • 26. Retail Slotting  Manufacturers pay fees to retailers to get the retailers to display (slot) their product  Contributing factors  Limited shelf space  An increasing number of new products  Better information about sales through POS data collection  Closer control of inventory © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 26
  • 27. Retail Store Shelf Space Planogram 5 facings  Computerized tool for shelf- Shampoo Shampoo Shampoo Shampoo Shampoo space management  Generated from store’s scanner Conditioner Shampoo Shampoo Shampoo Shampoo data on sales Conditioner Conditioner  Often supplied by manufacturer 2 ft. © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 27
  • 28. Servicescapes  Ambient conditions - background characteristics such as lighting, sound, smell, and temperature  Spatial layout and functionality - which involve customer circulation path planning, aisle characteristics, and product grouping  Signs, symbols, and artifacts - characteristics of building design that carry social significance © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 28
  • 29. Warehousing and Storage Layouts  Objective is to optimize trade-offs between handling costs and costs associated with warehouse space  Maximize the total “cube” of the warehouse – utilize its full volume while maintaining low material handling costs © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 29
  • 30. Warehousing and Storage Layouts Material Handling Costs  All costs associated with the transaction  Incoming transport  Storage  Finding and moving material  Outgoing transport  Equipment, people, material, supervision, insurance, depreciation  Minimize damage and spoilage © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 30
  • 31. Warehousing and Storage Layouts  Warehouse density tends to vary inversely with the number of different items stored  Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems (ASRSs) can significantly improve warehouse productivity by an estimated 500%  Dock location is a key design element © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 31
  • 32. Cross-Docking  Materials are moved directly from receiving to shipping and are not placed in storage in the warehouse  Requires tight scheduling and accurate shipments, bar code or RFID identification used for advanced shipment notification as materials are unloaded © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 32
  • 33. Random Stocking  Typically requires automatic identification systems (AISs) and effective information systems  Random assignment of stocking locations allows more efficient use of space  Key tasks 1. Maintain list of open locations 2. Maintain accurate records 3. Sequence items to minimize travel, pick time 4. Combine picking orders 5. Assign classes of items to particular areas © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 33
  • 34. Customizing  Value-added activities performed at the warehouse  Enable low cost and rapid response strategies  Assembly of components  Loading software  Repairs  Customized labeling and packaging © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 34
  • 35. Warehouse Layout Traditional Layout Storage racks Customization Conveyor Staging Office Shipping and receiving docks © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 35
  • 36. Warehouse Layout Cross-Docking Layout Shipping and receiving docks Office Shipping and receiving docks © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 36
  • 37. Fixed-Position Layout  Product remains in one place  Workers and equipment come to site  Complicating factors  Limited space at site  Different materials required at different stages of the project  Volume of materials needed is dynamic © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 37
  • 38. Alternative Strategy  As much of the project as possible is completed off-site in a product- oriented facility  This can significantly improve efficiency but is only possible when multiple similar units need to be created © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 38
  • 39. Process-Oriented Layout  Like machines and equipment are grouped together  Flexible and capable of handling a wide variety of products or services  Scheduling can be difficult and setup, material handling, and labor costs can be high © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 39
  • 40. Process-Oriented Layout Patient A - broken leg ER triage Emergency room admissions room Patient B - erratic heart Surgery pacemaker Laboratories Radiology ER Beds Pharmacy Billing/exit Figure 9.3 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 40
  • 41. Layout at Arnold Palmer Hospital Pie-shaped Central break rooms and medical supply rooms Local linen Central nurses supply station Local © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. nursing pod 9 – 41
  • 42. Process-Oriented Layout  Arrange work centers so as to minimize the costs of material handling  Basic cost elements are  Number of loads (or people) moving between centers  Distance loads (or people) move between centers © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 42
  • 43. Process-Oriented Layout n n Minimize cost = ∑ ∑ Xij Cij i=1 j=1 where n = total number of work centers or departments i, j = individual departments Xij = number of loads moved from department i to department j Cij = cost to move a load © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. between department i and 9 – 43
  • 44. Process Layout Example Arrange six departments in a factory to minimize the material handling costs. Each department is 20 x 20 feet and the building is 60 feet long and 40 feet wide. 1. Construct a “from-to matrix” 2. Determine the space requirements 3. Develop an initial schematic diagram 4. Determine the cost of this layout 5. Try to improve the layout 6. Prepare a detailed plan © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 44
  • 45. Process Layout Example Number of loads per week Department Assembly Painting Machine Receiving Shipping Testing (1) (2) Shop (3) (4) (5) (6) Assembly (1) 50 100 0 0 20 Painting (2) 30 50 10 0 Machine Shop (3) 20 0 100 Receiving (4) 50 0 Shipping (5) 0 Testing (6) Figure 9.4 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 45
  • 46. Process Layout Example Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Assembly Painting Machine Shop Department Department Department (1) (2) (3) 40’ Receiving Shipping Testing Department Department Department (4) (5) (6) Figure 9.5 Area 4 Area 5 Area 6 60’ © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 46
  • 47. Process Layout Example Interdepartmental Flow Graph 100 50 30 1 2 3 20 20 10 50 100 4 5 6 50 Figure 9.6 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 47
  • 48. Process Layout Example n n Cost = ∑ ∑ Xij Cij i=1 j=1 Cost = $50 + $200 + $40 (1 and 2) (1 and 3) (1 and 6) + $30 + $50 + $10 (2 and 3) (2 and 4) (2 and 5) + $40 + $100 + $50 (3 and 4) (3 and 6) (4 and 5) = $570 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 48
  • 49. Process Layout Example Revised Interdepartmental Flow Graph 30 50 100 2 1 3 10 50 20 50 100 50 4 5 6 Figure 9.7 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 49
  • 50. Process Layout Example n n Cost = ∑ ∑ Xij Cij i=1 j=1 Cost = $50 + $100 + $20 (1 and 2) (1 and 3) (1 and 6) + $60 + $50 + $10 (2 and 3) (2 and 4) (2 and 5) + $40 + $100 + $50 (3 and 4) (3 and 6) (4 and 5) = $480 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 50
  • 51. Process Layout Example Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Painting Assembly Machine Shop Department Department Department (2) (1) (3) 40’ Receiving Shipping Testing Department Department Department (4) (5) (6) Figure 9.8 Area 4 Area 5 Area 6 60’ © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 51
  • 52. Computer Software  Graphical approach only works for small problems  Computer programs are available to solve bigger problems  CRAFT  ALDEP  CORELAP  Factory Flow © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 52
  • 53. CRAFT Example PATTERN PATTERN 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 A A A A B B 1 D D D D B B 2 A A A A B B 2 D D D D B B 3 D D D D D D 3 D D D E E E 4 C C D D D D 4 C C D E E F 5 F F F F F D 5 A A A A A F 6 E E E E E D 6 A A A F F F TOTAL COST 20,100 TOTAL COST 14,390 EST. COST REDUCTION .00 EST. COST REDUCTION 70. ITERATION 0 ITERATION 3 (a) (b) Figure 9.9 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 53
  • 54. Computer Software  Three dimensional visualization software allows managers to view possible layouts and assess process, material handling, efficiency, and safety issues © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 54
  • 55. Work Cells  Reorganizes people and machines into groups to focus on single products or product groups  Group technology identifies products that have similar characteristics for particular cells  Volume must justify cells  Cells can be reconfigured as designs or volume changes © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 55
  • 56. Advantages of Work Cells 1. Reduced work-in-process inventory 2. Less floor space required 3. Reduced raw material and finished goods inventory 4. Reduced direct labor 5. Heightened sense of employee participation 6. Increased use of equipment and machinery 7. Reduced investment in machinery and equipment © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 56
  • 57. Improving Layouts Using Work Cells Current layout - workers in small closed areas. Cannot increase output without a third worker and third set of equipment. Improved layout - cross-trained workers can assist each other. May be able to add a third worker as additional output is needed. Figure 9.10 (a) © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 57
  • 58. Improving Layouts Using Work Cells Current layout - straight lines make it hard to balance Improved layout - in U tasks because work may not shape, workers have better be divided evenly access. Four cross-trained workers were reduced. U-shaped line may reduce employee movement and space requirements while enhancing communication, reducing the number of Figure 9.10 (b) workers, and facilitating inspection © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 58
  • 59. Requirements of Work Cells 1. Identification of families of products 2. A high level of training, flexibility and empowerment of employees 3. Being self-contained, with its own equipment and resources 4. Test (poka-yoke) at each station in the cell © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 59
  • 60. Staffing and Balancing Work Cells Determine the takt time Total work time available Takt time = Units required Determine the number of operators required Total operation time required Workers required = Takt time © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 60
  • 61. Staffing Work Cells Example 600 Mirrors per day required Mirror production scheduled for 8 hours per day From a work balance chart 60 total operation time 50 = 140 seconds Standard time required 40 30 20 10 0 Assemble Paint Test Label Pack for shipment Operations © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 61
  • 62. Staffing Work Cells Example 600 Mirrors per day required Mirror production scheduled for 8 hours per day From a work balance chart total operation time = 140 seconds Takt time = (8 hrs x 60 mins) / 600 units = .8 mins = 48 seconds Total operation time required Workers required = Takt time = 140 / 48 = 2.91 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 62
  • 63. Work Balance Charts  Used for evaluating operation times in work cells  Can help identify bottleneck operations  Flexible, cross-trained employees can help address labor bottlenecks  Machine bottlenecks may require other approaches © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 63
  • 64. Focused Work Center and Focused Factory  Focused Work Center  Identify a large family of similar products that have a large and stable demand  Moves production from a general-purpose, process-oriented facility to a large work cell  Focused Factory  A focused work cell in a separate facility  May be focused by product line, layout, quality, new product introduction, flexibility, or other requirements © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 64
  • 65. Focused Work Center and Focused Factory Work Cell Focused Work Center Focused Factory A work cell is a A focused work center is A focused factory is a temporary product- a permanent product- permanent facility to oriented arrangement oriented arrangement produce a product or of machines and of machines and component in a personnel in what is personnel in what is product-oriented ordinarily a process- ordinarily a process- facility. Many focused oriented facility. oriented facility. factories currently being built were originally part of a process-oriented facility. Example: A job shop Example: Pipe bracket Example: A plant to with machinery and manufacturing at a produce window personnel rearranged shipyard. mechanism for to produce 300 unique automobiles. control panels. © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. Table 9.2 9 – 65
  • 66. Repetitive and Product- Oriented Layout Organized around products or families of similar high-volume, low-variety products 1. Volume is adequate for high equipment utilization 2. Product demand is stable enough to justify high investment in specialized equipment 3. Product is standardized or approaching a phase of life cycle that justifies investment 4. Supplies of raw materials and components are adequate and of uniform quality © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 66
  • 67. Product-Oriented Layouts  Fabrication line  Builds components on a series of machines  Machine-paced  Require mechanical or engineering changes to balance  Assembly line  Puts fabricated parts together at a series of workstations  Paced by work tasks  Balanced by moving tasks Both types of lines must be balanced so that the time to perform the work at each station is the same © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 67
  • 68. Product-Oriented Layouts Advantages 1. Low variable cost per unit 2. Low material handling costs 3. Reduced work-in-process inventories 4. Easier training and supervision 5. Rapid throughput Disadvantages 1. High volume is required 2. Work stoppage at any point ties up the whole operation 3. Lack of flexibility in product or production rates © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 68
  • 69. McDonald’s Assembly Line Figure 9.12 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 69
  • 70. Disassembly Lines • Disassembly is being considered in new product designs • “Green” issues and recycling standards are important consideration • Automotive disassembly is the 16th largest industry in the US © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 70
  • 71. Assembly-Line Balancing  Objective is to minimize the imbalance between machines or personnel while meeting required output  Starts with the precedence relationships 1. Determine cycle time 2. Calculate theoretical minimum number of workstations 3. Balance the line by assigning specific tasks to workstations © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 71
  • 72. Wing Component Example Performance Task Must Follow Time Task Listed Task (minutes) Below A 10 — B 11 A This means that C 5 B tasks B and E cannot be done D 4 B until task A has E 12 A been completed F 3 C, D G 7 F H 11 E I 3 G, H Total time 66 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 72
  • 73. Wing Component Example Performance Task Must Follow Time Task Listed Task (minutes) Below A 10 — B 11 A C 5 B D 4 B E 12 A F 3 C, D 5 G 7 F 10 11 C 3 7 H 11 E A B F G I 3 G, H 4 3 Total time 66 12 D 11 I E H Figure 9.13 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 73
  • 74. Wing Component Example Performance Task Must Follow 480 available Time Task Listed mins per day Task (minutes) Below 40 units required A 10 — B 11 A Production time C 5 B available per day D 4 Cycle time = Units required per day B E 12 A = 480 / 40 F 3 C, D 5 = 12 minutes per unit G 7 F 10 11 C 3 7 n H 11 E I 3 Minimum A i∑1Time for taskF G, H = B 4 i G number of = 3 Total time 66 workstations Cycle D time 12 11 I = 66 / 12 E H = 5.5 or 6 stations Figure 9.13 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 74
  • 75. WingLine-Balancing Heuristics Component Example 1. Longest task time Choose the available task 480 available Performance Task Must Followlongest task time with the Time Task Listed mins per day Task Most following tasksBelow 2. (minutes) Choose the available task required 40 units A 10 —with the largestCycle time = 12 mins number of B 11 Afollowing tasks Minimum C 3. Ranked positional 5 B workstations for or 6 Choose the available task = 5.5 D weight4 Bwhich the sum of following E 12 Atask times is the longest F 3 C, D 5 G 4. Shortest task time 7 FChoose the available task C with the 10 shortest task time 11 3 7 H 11 E A B F G I 5. Least number of 3 G,Choose the available task H 4 3 Total time 66 tasks following with the least number of D I following tasks 12 11 E H Table 9.4 Figure 9.13 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 75
  • 76. Wing Component Example Performance Task Must Follow 480 available Time Task Listed mins per day Task (minutes) Below 40 units required A 10 — Cycle time = 12 mins B 11 A Minimum Station workstations = 5.5 or 6 5 B C 5 2 D 4 C B E 10 11 12 A 3 7 F A B 3 C, D F G 4 3 G 7 F H 11 D E Station 3 I I 3 12 G, H 11 Station 6 Total time 66 Station 1 E H Station Station 4 5 Figure 9.14 © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 76
  • 77. Wing Component Example Performance Task Must Follow 480 available Time Task Listed mins per day Task (minutes) Below 40 units required A 10 — Cycle time = 12 mins B 11 A Minimum C 5 B workstations = 5.5 or 6 D 4 B E 12 A F 3 C, D G 7 F ∑ Task times Efficiency = H (Actual number of workstations) x (Largest cycle time) 11 E I 3 G, H = 66 minutes / (6 stations) x (12 minutes) Total time 66 = 91.7% © 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 9 – 77