1. Vancouver Resource Investment Conference
January 20, 2014

2. CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
Forward Looking Information
This Presentation contains ‘‘forward-looking information’’ and forward-looking statements within the meaning of applicable Canadian and United States securities legislation.
Forward-looking information may include, but is not limited to, information with respect to the anticipated production and developments in our operations in future periods, our
planned exploration and development activities, the adequacy of our financial resources, the estimation of mineral reserves and resources, realization of mineral reserves and
resource estimates, costs and timing of development of the projects we currently intend to acquire (the “Projects”), costs and timing of future exploration, results of future
exploration and drilling, timing and receipt of approvals, consents and permits under applicable legislation, our executive compensation approach and practice, the composition
of our board of directors and committees, and adequacy of financial resources. Wherever possible, words such as ‘‘plans’’, ‘‘expects’’ or ‘‘does not expect’’, ‘‘budget’’, ‘‘scheduled’’,
‘‘estimates’’, ‘‘forecasts’’, ‘‘anticipate’’, ‘‘believe’’, ‘‘intend’’ and similar expressions or statements that certain actions, events or results ‘‘may’’, ‘‘could’’, ‘‘would’’, ‘‘might’’ or
‘‘will’’ be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative forms of any of these terms and similar expressions have been used to identify forward-looking information. Statements
concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed to constitute forward-looking information to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that will be
encountered if the property is developed. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives,
assumptions or future events or performance are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking information. Forward-looking information is subject to a variety of
known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking information
including, without limitation, those risks identified in our Annual Information Form dated March 18, 2013 filed on SEDAR at www.Sedar.com and in the United States on Form
40-F through EDGAR at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Although we have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from
those contained in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such
information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such information. Forward-looking information involves
statements about the future and is inherently uncertain, and our actual achievements or other future events or conditions may differ materially from those reflected in the
forward-looking information due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including, without limitation, those referred to in the Prospectus under the heading ‘‘Risk
Factors’’. Our forward-looking information is based on the beliefs, expectations and opinions of management on the date the statements are made, and we do not assume any
obligation to update forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than as required by applicable law. For the reasons
set forth above, prospective investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information.
National Instrument 43-101
Technical and scientific information contained herein relating to the Projects is derived from National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) compliant technical reports (“Reports”)
“Mineral Resources Update Technical Report” dated November 20, 2012 and “Feasibility Study and Technical Report on the Brucejack Project, Stewart, BC” dated June 21, 2013.
We have filed the Reports under our profile at www.sedar.com. Technical and scientific information not contained within the Reports for the Projects have been prepared under
the supervision of Mr. Kenneth C. McNaughton, an independent “qualified person” under NI 43-101.
This presentation uses the terms “measured resources”, “indicated resources” (together “M&I”) and “inferred resources”. Although these terms are recognized and required by
Canadian regulations (under NI 43-101), the United States Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize them. Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves do
not have demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of mineral resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political,
marketing, or other relevant issues. There is no guarantee that all or any part of the mineral resource will be converted into mineral reserves.
In addition, “inferred resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an
inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre
feasibility studies, or economic studies, except for a Preliminary Assessment as defined under NI 43-101. Investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred
resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.
Currency
Unless otherwise indicated, all dollar values herein are in Canadian $.
2

3. An investment in Gold
 High-grade
underground gold
project
 Commercial
production target
2016
 Located in British
Columbia, Canada
3

4. BRUCEJACK CORE AND ROCK SAMPLES
• Get good pictures of our gold rock samples
4

5. BRUCEJACK PROJECT LOCATION
Red Chris
Mt Milligan
220km
Terrace
5

6. BC EXPLORATION (1,2,3)
Exploration Expenditures in BC
800000000
700000000
600000000
500000000
400000000
300000000
200000000
100000000
0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
Brucejack & Snowfield
Total BC Mineral
(1) BC Stats – Ministry of Technology, Innovation and Citizens’ Services Ministry of Energy and Mines
(2) Pretium Resources Inc. – Consolidated Financial Statements for the Years Ended Dec 31, 2013 and 2011
(3) Silver Standard Resources Inc. - Annual Report 2010
6

7. HIGH-GRADE GOLD RESERVES(1,2,3)
Valley of the Kings Mineral Reserve Estimate – May 16, 2013
Category
Probable
(1)
(2)
(3)
Tonnes
(mil)
Gold
(g/t)
Silver
(g/t)
15.1
13.6
11.0
Contained
Gold
Silver
(mil oz) (mil oz)
6.6
5.3
West Zone Mineral Reserve Estimate – May 16, 2013
Category
Proven
Probable
Total P&P
Contained
Tonnes Gold Silver Gold
Silver
(mil)
(g/t) (g/t) (mil oz) (mil oz)
5.7
309
0.4
19.9
2.0
1.8
5.8
172
0.3
10.1
3.8
5.8
243
0.7
30.0
Source: Feasibility Study and Technical Report on the Brucejack Project, dated June 21, 2013
Base case metals prices of US$1,350 /oz gold and US$20/oz silver
The June 2013 feasibility study is based on the November 2012 Mineral Resource estimate for the Brucejack Project and will be amended in 2014.
7

8. MILESTONES TO PRODUCTION
2013

Completed Feasibility Study (June)

Completed underground bulk sample
program and exploration

Updated Resource Estimate (December)
H1 2014

File Environmental Assessment
Certificate Application

Amend Feasibility Study
H2 2014/ 2015

Anticipate Environmental Assessment
Certificate

Mine construction
2016

Commission, ramp-up, commercial
production at Brucejack Gold Mine
8

9. DECEMBER 2013 RESOURCE ESTIMATE
 The updated Valley of the Kings Resource estimate announced in
December (6) added Measured gold Resources and increased gold grade:
Valley of the Kings Mineral Resource estimate - December 2013(1),(4)
(Based on a cut-off grade of 5.0 grams of gold-equivalent/tonne(5))
Category
Measured
Indicated
M&I
Inferred(2)
Tonnes
(millions)
2.0
13.4
15.3
5.9
Gold
(g/t)
19.3
17.4
17.6
25.6
Silver
(g/t)
14.4
14.3
14.3
20.6
Contained(3)
Gold
(million oz)
1.2
7.5
8.7
4.9
Silver
(million oz)
0.9
6.1
7.0
3.9
 The June 2013 Feasibility Study will be amended using the December
Valley of the Kings Mineral Resource estimate (6)
(1) Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by
environmental, permitting, legal, marketing, or other relevant issues. The Mineral Resources in this news release were estimated using the Canadian Institute of Mining,
Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM), CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions and Guidelines prepared by the CIM Standing Committee on Reserve
Definitions and adopted by CIM Council.
(2) The quantity and grade of reported Inferred resources in this estimation are uncertain in nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define these Inferred Resources as
an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in upgrading them to an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource category.
(3) Contained metal figures and totals may differ due to rounding of figures.
(4) The Mineral Resource estimate stated in Table 1 is defined using 10 m by 10 m by 10 m blocks in the in Valley of the Kings.
(5) The gold equivalent value is defined as AuEq = Au + Ag/53.
(6) See news release dated December 19, 2013.
9

10. VALLEY OF THE KINGS: STOCKWORK
N
S
~0.5 m
Domain 20
Cleo
West Drift
615L West Raise
10

11. MINING THE VALLEY OF THE KINGS
 Long-hole stoping mining method
 Bulk sample program conclusions:
 Stockwork is well-defined
 Excellent rock competency
 Waste rock disposal proven
 Proven logistics
 Trade-off study underway for
staged development potential in
order to manage Capex
S
100 m
Valley of the Kings proposed mining stopes 15m wide X 30m high
(June 2013 Feasibility Study)
11

12. PROCESSING REFINEMENT
 Gravity and flotation
concentration
 Producing gold/silver
concentrate and doré
 Bulk sample program gold
recoveries averaged 98%
 Evaluate increasing recoveries
in amended Feasibility Study
(from 95% in June 2013 FS)
 Opportunity to simplify flow
sheet
12

13. OPTIMIZED SITE LAYOUT
13

14. JUNE 2013 FEASIBILITY STUDY (1,2)
 The June 2013 Feasibility Study is based on the November 2012 Mineral Resource estimate
for the Brucejack Project and will be amended in 2014 to incorporate the December 2013
Mineral Resource estimate for the Valley of the Kings. (4)
Processing rate
2,700 tonnes per day
Mine life
22 years
Total gold production
7.1 million oz
Average annual gold production
425,700 ounces (years 1-10)
321,500 ounces (life of mine)
Average gold grade
14.2 g/t (years 1-10)
12.0 g/t (life of mine)
All-in sustaining cash cost per oz(3)
$508/oz
Capex (including contingencies)
US$663.5 million
Total operating costs
C$156.46/t milled
Internal Rate of Return
42.9% (pre-tax)
35.7% (post-tax)
Net Present Value
(5% discount)
US$2.69 billion (pre-tax)
US$1.76 billion (post-tax)
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Source: Feasibility Study and Technical Report on the Brucejack Project, (Tetra Tech) dated June 21, 2013
Base case metals prices of US$1,350 /oz gold and US$20/oz silver
Includes by-product cash costs, sustaining capital, exploration expense and reclamation cost accretion
See Slide 9
14

15. 2014 AMENDED FEASIBILITY STUDY (1)

Uses Measured & Indicated Resources

Uses lower metals prices, updated exchange rates



$1,100 gold, $17 silver
$0.92 CAD:US
Optimized site layout

Reduced surface prep

Cost and time savings


(1)
Refinements underway for mining, metallurgy and flow
sheet based on results of 2013’s Valley of the Kings bulk
sample program
Amended Brucejack Project Feasibility Study expected Q2
The amended Brucejack Project Feasibility Study will be based on the December 2013 Mineral Resource estimate for the Valley of the Kings. See slide 9.
15

16. REGIONAL WATERSHED AREA
• Drainage pathways and watershed boundaries
CASCADE
map
BRUCEJACK LAKE
(not fish habitat)
BRUCEJACK
PROJECT
16

17. BRUCEJACK PERMITTING
Brucejack Lake is not fish habitat
 Nearest fish 20 km away
 Waterfalls and Sulphurets Glacier
impede fish migration
Brucejack Lake is 100 meters deep
Up to 50% of tailings to be deposited in
the Lake, with total volume of tailings
stored in bottom 30 meters
Focus on minimizing potential for
suspended solids to discharge from
Brucejack Lake
50% or more of tailings to be used for
paste backfill and deposited underground





Reclamation
Permit
Mine Development
Certificate issued
April 15, 1993
1986
Permitted for
exploration and
exploration road
Reclamation
Completion
1993
1999
1989
1998
Approval in principle
for development of a
mine at West Zone
Project Assessment
Certificate
2011-2012
2006
Anticipate
Environmental
Commercial
Assessment Certificate production target
2014
2013
Project Assessment
Project Description
Certificate allowed to
under review for
expire
underground mine at
Brucejack’s Valley of
the Kings
2016
2015
Construction,
commissioning
17

18. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
 Commercial relationships with local First
Nations during the exploration phase at
Brucejack have been mutually successful
 Examples of Brucejack Project contracts with
First Nation development corporations
include camp construction, access road
maintenance, waste rock disposal
 The proposed mine will provide
approximately 800 jobs during construction
and 500 jobs during operations
 We will continue to extend both commercial
contract and employment opportunities to
locals whenever possible
Stewart warehouse constructed by development
corporation of Skii km Lax Ha First Nation
18

19. THE NEXT SIX MONTHS:
Q1 2014

File 43-101 Technical Report for
December 2013 Mineral Resource
estimate update

Technical sessions on Resource
estimate (to be webcast)

Process 1,000 tonnes of high-grade ore
from 2013 exploration program

Plan for excavation of additional 1,000
tonnes of high-grade ore

File Environmental Assessment
Certificate application
Q2 2014

Amend Feasibility Study

Plan underground exploration program

Potential production of additional 1,000
tonnes of high-grade ore
19

20. ADDITIONAL EXPLORATION POTENTIAL
N
Valley of the Kings
Access Ramp
SU-498
0.5m @ 3,874 g/t Au
Bulk Sample
VU-136
0.5m @ 1,100 g/t Au
SU-526
1.16m @ 4,195 g/t Au
Brucejack Fault
Approximate surface
projection of December
2013 Indicated resources
200 m
20

21. HIGH-GRADE GOLD WITH SIZE
16.0
Kirkland Lake Mine
(Kirkland Lake)
Proven + Probable Gold Grade (g/t)
14.0
Pogo Mine
(Sumitomo)
Valley of the Kings
Probable Gold (1):
6.6 Moz. @ 13.6 g/t Au
12.0
Red Lake Mine
(Goldcorp)
10.0
Eleonore
(Goldcorp)
Kensington Mine
(Coeur)
8.0
Cerro Negro
(Goldcorp)
El Penon Mine
(Yamana)
6.0
Casa Berardi
(Hecla/Aurizon)
4.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
Proven + Probable Gold Reserves (mm oz)
Data source: Companies
(1) Valley of the Kings reserves based on June 2013 Feasibility Study to be amended in 2014 using updated Mineral Resource estimate.
21

22. SHAREHOLDING & ANALYST COVERAGE
Retail,
29%
Top Shareholders(2)
Silver
Standard,
18%
Institutions,
49%
Management,
4%
Capital Structure
(1)
(shares in millions)
Public Float
Silver Standard Shares
Total Issued & Outstanding Shares
Incentive Options
Total Fully Diluted Shares
86.0
19.0
105.0
9.8
114.8
Market Cap (at January 16, 2014)
C$673 million
Working Capital (at Sept. 30, 2013)
C$34.8 million
(1) As of January 10, 2014; ownership calculated on an undiluted basis.
(2) As of January 10, 2014. Source: IPREO, SEDI
Silver Standard Resources
Royce & Associates
Liberty Metals & Mining
Passport Capital
Robert Quartermain
Sun Valley Gold LLC
TD Asset Management
Sprott Asset Management
Schroder Inv. Mgmt. (N.A)
Fidelity Management
(shares in millions)
18.986
7.247
6.850
3.788
2.853
2.611
2.001
1.684
1.544
1.240
Analyst Coverage
BMO
CIBC
Citibank
Cormark Securities
Cowen Securities
GMP Securities
RBC
Roth Capital Partners
Salman Partners
Scotiabank
Very Independent Research
John Hayes
Jeff Killeen
Alex Hacking
Richard Gray
Adam Graf
George Albino
Dan Rollins
Joseph Reagor
Ash Guglani
Ovais Habib
John Tumazos
22

23. Advancing a major high-grade gold project in Canada
CONTACT
Phone: 604-558-1784
Fax: 604-558-4784
Toll-free: 1-877-558-1784
invest@pretivm.com
www.pretivm.com
HEAD OFFICE
Pretium Resources Inc.
570 Granville St.
Suite 1600
Vancouver, BC
Canada V6C 3P1
COMMON SHARES
TSX/NYSE:PVG
Issued: 105 million
Fully diluted: 114.8 million
52-week hi/low: $12.54/$2.83
Market cap: $673 million
(at January 16, 2014)