The corporate presentation provides an overview of Pretivm Resources Inc. and its Brucejack gold project in British Columbia, Canada. It highlights the project's significant high-grade gold resource of 8.5 million ounces indicated and 2.9 million ounces inferred. It also outlines plans for an underground feasibility study in Q2 2013 and commercial production targeted for early 2016. The presentation provides details on the project's exploration history, location, mineral resources and high grades that place it among the world's best undeveloped gold projects.

1. Corporate Presentation
March 2013

2. CAUTIONARY STATEMENT
Forward Looking Information
This Presentation contains ‘‘forward-looking information’’ within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation and the United States Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking information may include, but is not limited to, information with respect to the anticipated production and developments in our operations
in future periods, our planned exploration and development activities, the adequacy of our financial resources, the estimation of mineral resources, realization of mineral resource
estimates, costs and timing of development of the projects we currently intend to acquire (the “Projects”), costs and timing of future exploration, results of future exploration and
drilling, timing and receipt of approvals, consents and permits under applicable legislation, our executive compensation approach and practice, the composition of our board of
directors and committees, and adequacy of financial resources. Wherever possible, words such as ‘‘plans’’, ‘‘expects’’ or ‘‘does not expect’’, ‘‘budget’’, ‘‘scheduled’’, ‘‘estimates’’,
‘‘forecasts’’, ‘‘anticipate’’ or ‘‘does not anticipate’’, ‘‘believe’’, ‘‘intend’’ and similar expressions or statements that certain actions, events or results ‘‘may’’, ‘‘could’’, ‘‘would’’,
‘‘might’’ or ‘‘will’’ be taken, occur or be achieved, have been used to identify forward-looking information. Statements concerning mineral resource estimates may also be deemed
to constitute forward-looking information to the extent that they involve estimates of the mineralization that will be encountered if the property is developed. Any statements that
express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always,
using words or phrases such as ‘‘expects’’, ‘‘anticipates’’, ‘‘plans’’, ‘‘projects’’, ‘‘estimates’’, ‘‘assumes’’, ‘‘intends’’, ‘‘strategy’’, ‘‘goals’’, ‘‘objectives’’, ‘‘potential’’ or variations
thereof, or stating that certain actions, events or results ‘‘may’’, ‘‘could’’, ‘‘would’’, ‘‘might’’ or ‘‘will’’ be taken, occur or be achieved, or the negative of any of these terms and
similar expressions) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking information. Forward-looking information is subject to a variety of known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking information. Many of these risks
are listed and described in our final short-form prospectus dated March 19, 2012 (the “Prospectus”), which is available for review on SEDAR at www.sedar.com under our profile.
Although we have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there may be
other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and
future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such information. Forward-looking information involves statements about the future and is inherently uncertain,
and our actual achievements or other future events or conditions may differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking information due to a variety of risks,
uncertainties and other factors, including, without limitation, those referred to in the Prospectus under the heading ‘‘Risk Factors’’. Our forward-looking information is based on
the beliefs, expectations and opinions of management on the date the statements are made, and we do not assume any obligation to update forward-looking information, whether
as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than as required by applicable law. For the reasons set forth above, prospective investors should not place undue
reliance on forward-looking information.
National Instrument 43-101
Technical and scientific information contained herein relating to the Projects is derived from National Instrument 43-101 (“NI 43-101”) compliant technical reports (“Reports”)
“Technical Report and Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment of the Brucejack Project” dated February 20, 2012 “Mineral Resources Update Technical Report” dated April
3, 2012, “Mineral Resources Update Technical Report” dated September 18, 2012 and “Mineral Resources Update Technical Report” dated November 20, 2012. We have filed the
Reports under our profile at www.sedar.com. Technical and scientific information not contained within the Reports for the Projects have been prepared under the supervision of
Mr. Kenneth C. McNaughton, an independent “qualified person” under NI 43-101.
This presentation uses the terms “measured resources”, “indicated resources” (together “M&I”) and “inferred resources”. Although these terms are recognized and required by
Canadian regulations (under NI 43-101), the United States Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize them. Mineral resources which are not mineral reserves do
not have demonstrated economic viability. The estimate of mineral resources may be materially affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political,
marketing, or other relevant issues. There is no guarantee that all or any part of the mineral resource will be converted into mineral reserves.
In addition, “inferred resources” have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an
inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre
feasibility studies, or economic studies, except for a Preliminary Assessment as defined under NI 43-101. Investors are cautioned not to assume that part or all of an inferred
resource exists, or is economically or legally mineable.
Currency
Unless otherwise indicated, all dollar values herein are in Canadian $.
2

3. An investment in Gold
 Significant high-grade gold resource:
Valley of the Kings
8.5 M oz gold Indicated (16.1 Mt @ 16.4 g/t gold)
2.9 M oz gold Inferred (5.4 Mt @ 17.0 g/t gold)
 Located in British Columbia, Canada
 Underground feasibility study Q2 2013
 Commercial production target early 2016
3

4. HIGH-GRADE GOLD WITH SIZE
18.0
Valley of the
16.0
Kings
F2 Deposit Indicated Gold:
Kirkland Lake Mine (Rubicon)
(Kirkland Lake) 8.5 mm oz @ 16.4 g/t Au
14.0
M&I + Inferred Gold Grade (g/t)
Inferred Gold:
Pogo Mine Red Lake Mine 2.9 mm oz @ 17.0 g/t Au
12.0 (Sumitomo)
(Goldcorp)
10.0
Buritica
(Continental) Eleonore
Kensington Mine (Goldcorp)
8.0 (Coeur)
Cerro Negro
El Penon Mine (Goldcorp)
6.0 (Yamana)
4.0 Cerro Moro
(Yamana) Casa Berardi
(Aurizon)
2.0
0.0
0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0
M&I + Inferred Gold Resources (mm oz)
November 2012 Valley of the Kings High-Grade Gold Mineral Resource based on a cut-off grade of 5.0 grams of gold-equivalent/tonne.
Data sources: Intierra Ltd., NRH. 4

5. BRUCEJACK PROJECT LOCATION
5

6. EXPLORATION AND OWNERSHIP HISTORY
5.3 km
Exploration by underground Exploration resumes. Extensive exploration
various development of Mine Development Discovery of Valley of program, high-grade
companies West Zone Certificate issued the Kings Zone resource, exploration road
1960-1980 1986-1989 1993 2009 2011-2012
1980-1985 1990 1999-2000 2010 2013
West Zone discovery West Zone Acquisition by Acquisition by Valley of the Kings
and definition Feasibility Study Silver Standard Pretivm underground bulk
by Newhawk completed Resources Inc. sample and feasibility
study
6

7. BRUCEJACK HIGH-GRADE RESOURCE
Valley of the Kings Mineral Resource Estimate –
November 2012(1,4,5)
(Based on a cut-off grade of 5.0 grams of gold-equivalent/tonne)
Contained(3)
Category Tonnes Gold Silver Gold Silver
(mil) (g/t) (g/t) (mil oz) (mil oz)
Indicated 16.1 16.4 14.2 8.5 7.3
Inferred(2) 5.4 17.0 15.7 2.9 2.7
(1) Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic
viability. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by environmental,
permitting, legal, marketing, or other relevant issues. The Mineral Resources in this news
release were estimated using the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
(CIM), CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions and Guidelines
prepared by the CIM Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions and adopted by CIM
Council.
(2) The quantity and grade of reported Inferred resources in this estimation are uncertain in
nature and there has been insufficient exploration to define these Inferred Resources as an
Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in
upgrading them to an Indicated or Measured Mineral Resource category.
(3) Contained metal may differ due to rounding.
(4) The Mineral Resource estimate is defined using 5 m by 5 by 5 m blocks in the well drilled
portion of West Zone (5 m by 10 m drilling or better) and 10 m by 10 m by 10 m blocks in the
remainder of West Zone and in Valley of the Kings.
(5) The gold equivalent value is defined as AuEq=Au + Ag/53
7

8. VALLEY OF THE KINGS INDICATED RESOURCE
1,092,100 1,776,900 1,467,600 2,185,800 1,391,000 380,100 192,900 Ind. Au* (Oz.)
Northing Ind.Gold*
(± 25 m) (Oz.)
6258225 230,900
6258175 484,000
6258125 703,100
6258075 336,600
6258025 1,951,100
6257975 2,365,900
6257925 1,021,000
6257875 513,600
6257825 687,500
Valley of the Kings
6257775 176,400 Indicated Mineral Resource:
8.5 Moz. Au @ 5.0 g/t AuEq.
(16.1 Mt @ 16.4 g/t Au)
*Nov. 2012 Indicated Mineral Resource;
≥5.0 g/t AuEq.
8
Total Ounces per 100 m Easting and 50 m Northing strips

9. MINERAL RESOURCE CONTINUITY
Level (m) Ind. Gold (Oz)*
Total Ounces* per 10 x 100 m N-S corridor – 6257800 N Long Section
1540-1570 116,300 W E
1510-1540 499,700
1480-1510 734,800
1450-1480 510,400
1420-1450 365,450
1390-1420 566,700
1360-1390 631,700
1330-1360 364,800
1300-1330 527,400
1270-1300 992,000
1240-1270 998,200
1210-1240 521,950
1180-1210 213,050 Key (Oz. Au)
1150-1180 246,800 <1,000
1120-1150 294,600 1,000-3,000
3,000-4,000
1090-1120 393,900
4,000-6,000
1060-1090 317,600 6,000-7,000
Total Ounces per level 7,000-8,000
(Valley of Kings Zone) 100 m 8,000-10,000
*Nov. 2012 Indicated Mineral Resource; 9
≥5.0 g/t AuEq.
>10,000

10. CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKS
Valley of the Kings block model – 426550E section view West (+/- 50m)
Indicated and Inferred blocks greater than 5 g/t AuEq
10

11. CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKS
Valley of the Kings block model – 426600E section view West (+/- 50m)
Indicated and Inferred blocks greater than 5 g/t AuEq
11

12. CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKS
Valley of the Kings block model plan view - 1300m level (+/- 25m)
100 m
12

13. CONTINUITY: HIGH GRADE BLOCKS
Valley of the Kings block model plan view - 1250m level (+/- 25m)
100 m
13

14. MAIN MINERALIZED DOMAINS
S N
Domain 11
Valley of the
Kings Bulk
Sample
West Zone
Underground
Development
Domain 17
200 m
14

15. BULK SAMPLE LOCATION
S N
Valley of the
Kings Bulk
546 meters
Sample
West Zone
Underground
Development
200 m
 10,000-tonne bulk sample from Valley of the Kings planned (Q2/Q3)
Key
 5 X 5 meter slashing of existing West Zone workings completed 0.5-5.0 g/t AuEq
5.0-15.0 g/t AuEq
 Turned towards Valley of the Kings, with over 250 meters now completed >15.0 g/t AuEq
15

16. HIGH-GRADE CORRIDORS
Valley of the Kings Drill Hole Trace Bar Graphs – 426630E Section View
Bulk sample
Mineralization
Corridor
16

17. BULK SAMPLE LOCATION
1345 m Level
Key (Domain)
17
11
Vertical viewing window ±8.5 m
17

18. BULK SAMPLE LOCATION
1345 m Level
Siltstone, litharenite,
pebble conglomerate
Polylithic Conglomerate
Key (g/t AuEq)
0.3-1
1-2.5
2.5-5
5-10 Fragmental
Volcanic Rocks
10-20
20-60 Intensely
>60 Silicified
Conglomerate
Hbl-phyric
Latite Flow
Vertical viewing window ±8.5 m
18

19. BULK SAMPLE LOCATION
1345 m Level
Polylithic Conglomerate
Siltstone, litharenite,
pebble conglomerate
Key (g/t AuEq)
5-10
Fragmental
10-20
Volcanic Rocks
20-60
Intensely
>60 Silicified
Conglomerate
Hbl-phyric
Latite Flow
Only Indicated blocks greater than 5 g/t AuEq shown
Vertical viewing window ±8.5 m
19

20. TYPICAL SAMPLE TOWER FLOWSHEET
20

21. UNDERGROUND DRILLING
PHASE IV Typical Section – Fan Drilling
N S
N
21

22. VISIBLE GOLD/STOCKWORK
22

23. MINING METHOD FOR STOCKWORK
Long hole stoping mining method:
 Corridors of high-grade visible
gold seams within lower grade
(5g/t to 20g/t) gold quartz
stockwork
 Steeply dipping ore body
 Competent ground conditions
 Stope widths (15m wide X 30m
high) appropriate both for
transverse and longitudinal
layouts
 Cost effective
23
First 50 meters of Valley of the Kings ramp

24. PROPOSED MINE DEVELOPMENT
Oblique View of Mining Stopes, Valley of the Kings
N
S 100 m
24

25. MINE AND MILL SITE LAYOUT
Flowsheet Summary:
Crushing
Grinding
Gravity Concentrate Circuit
Doré (50%-60%)
Flotation Concentrate Circuit
Off-take (40%-50%)
25

26. BRUCEJACK PROJECT ECONOMICS
Feasibility Study (expected Q2):
February 2012 Preliminary Economic
Assessment Results(1,2) :  Processing rate increased
Processing rate 1,500 tpd  2,700 tonnes per day
Mine life 24 years
Total gold production 6.9 million oz  Mill facilities streamlined
Average annual gold 325,000 ounces  Flotation concentrate to be sold to
production (Yrs 1-12) 3rd parties rather than refined on
Capex US$436.3 million site
Total operating costs C$170.90/t milled  Capex and Opex savings, reduced
Internal Rate of 29.8% project footprint
Return
Net Present Value US$2.262 billion  Metallurgy continues to be positive
(5% discount)
(1) Source: Technical Report and Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment of
 Feasibility metallurgical studies
(2)
the Brucejack Project, effective date February 20, 2012
Base case metals prices of US$1,100 /oz gold and US$21/oz silver confirm gold recoveries over 95%
PEA is based on Mineral Resource estimates for the Valley of the Kings and
West Zone effective November 28, 2011 which are now out-of-date.
26

27. 2013 BRUCEJACK PROJECT PLANS
H1 2013
 Access ramp to Valley of the Kings is
underway, with over 250 meters
completed out of 546 meters in total
 Channel sample the ramp to Valley of
the Kings
 Underground sampling/drilling Valley
of the Kings
 10,000-tonne underground bulk sample
from Valley of the Kings
 Feasibility study completed
H2 2013 (post bulk sample)
 Process bulk sample
 Potential Valley of the Kings expansion
drilling
27

28. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
 Pretivm’s management team has been
cooperatively engaging with First Nations
and local community leaders in the
Stewart, BC region for over 10 years
 We work to ensure that our
communication about the progress of the
Brucejack Project is open and continuous
 Commercial relationships with local First
Nations developed during the exploration
phase at Brucejack have been mutually
successful
 We will continue to extend both
commercial contract and employment
opportunities to locals whenever possible
Stewart warehouse constructed by development
corporation of Skii km Lax Ha First Nation
28

29. BRUCEJACK PERMITTING
 Brucejack Lake is not fish habitat
 Waste rock from 1980’s/1990’s
underground development was deposited
in Brucejack Lake as part of 1999
reclamation
 More than 50% of tailings (targeting 60%) to
be used for paste backfill and deposited
underground, with remainder of tailings to
be deposited in bottom 30 meters of
Brucejack Lake
Mine Development Permitted for exploration
Certificate issued Reclamation Completion and exploration road
Reclamation Permit April 15, 1993 (Silver Standard) (Pretivm)
(MX-1-86) (MDC 92-06) (MEND 9.1c) (MX-1-832), (MX-1-842)
1986 1993 1999 2011-2012
1989 1998 2006 2013
Approval in Project Assessment Project Assessment Project Description under
principle for Certificate Certificate allowed to review for underground
development of a (PAC 98-03) expire (Silver Standard) mine at Brucejack’s Valley
mine at West Zone (PAC M98-03) of the Kings
29

30. PRETIVM MANAGEMENT
Robert Quartermain, B.Sc., M.Sc., P.Geo, D.Sc. Kevin Torpy, B.Sc.
President & Chief Executive Officer, Director, Mine Engineering
Director
Joseph Ovsenek, B.A. Sc., P.Eng., LLB Max Holtby, B.Sc., P. Geo.
Vice President & Chief Development Officer, Director, Permitting
Director
Ken McNaughton, M.A. Sc., P.Eng. Michelle Romero, B.A., M.L.S.
Vice President & Chief Exploration Officer Director, Corporate Relations
Ian I Chang, M.A. Sc., P.Eng. Andrew Saltis, I.Eng.
Vice President, Project Development Site Project Manager, Mine Manager
Warwick Board, Ph.D., P.Geo. Peter de Visser, CA
Chief Geologist Chief Financial Officer
30

31. SHAREHOLDING & ANALYST COVERAGE
Top Shareholders(2) (shares in millions)
Silver Standard Resources 18.986
Silver
Standard,
Royce & Associates 10.689
20% Passport Capital 5.386
Institutions, Fidelity Management 3.720
Management,
5% 50% Connor, Clark & Lunn 2.602
Robert Quartermain 2.853
Retail, 23% TD Asset Management 2.153
Carmignac Gestion 1.898
Sprott Asset Management 1.718
Capital Structure(1) (shares in millions) Analyst Coverage
Public Float 77.5 BMO John Hayes
Silver Standard Shares 19.0 CIBC Jeff Killeen
Total Issued & Outstanding Shares 96.5 Citibank Alex Hacking
Incentive Options 8.5 Cormark Securities Richard Gray
Total Fully Diluted Shares 105.0 Dahlman Rose Adam Graf
Global Hunter Securities Jeff Wright
Market Capitalization C$788 million GMP Securities TBD
RBC Dan Rollins
Working Capital (at Dec. 31, 2012) C$30.1 million Salman Partners Ash Guglani
Share Offering gross proceeds (at Scotiabank Ovais Habib
C$21.0 million
February 15, 2013)(3) UBS TBD
(1)As of March 15, 2013; ownership calculated on an undiluted basis. Very Independent Research John Tumazos
(2)As of March 15, 2013. Source: IPREO, SEDI 31
(3)See news release dated February 15, 2013

32. HIGH-GRADE GOLD PRODUCTION
Average gold production vs. grade for various North American
700 producing mines with >2Moz Au
Detour Lake Mine (Detour
Gold)
600
Canadian Malartic (Osisko) Valley of the Kings
Red Lake (Goldcorp) (Pretium )
500
Annual Gold Production (Koz/year)
400
Production target:
Round Mountain (Barrick /
400k-500k oz/year
Kinross)
Fort Knox (Kinross) @ 14g/t -16g/t head grade
300 MeadowBank (Agnico
Eagle)
Hycroft (Allied Nevada Musselwhite (Goldcorp)
Gold)
Kemess (Aurico)
200 Casa Berardi Mine
(Aurizon Mines) Turqouise Ridge (Barrick /
Mesquite (NewGold) Newmont)
Kirkland Lake (Kirkland
Laronde (Agnico Eagle) Lake Gold)
Ruby Hill (Barrick)
100
Marigold Mine Carlin (Newmont)
(GoldCorp/Barrick)
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18
Grade (g/t)
Data sources: Companies, NRH. 32

33. Advancing a major high-grade gold resource in Canada
CONTACT HEAD OFFICE COMMON SHARES
Phone: 604-558-1784 Pretium Resources Inc. TSX/NYSE:PVG
Fax: 604-558-4784 570 Granville St. Issued: 96.5 million
Toll-free: 1-877-558-1784 Suite 1600 Fully diluted: 105.0 million
invest@pretivm.com Vancouver, BC 52-week hi/low: $17.41/$7.11
www.pretivm.com Canada V6C 3P1 Market cap: $788 million