2015 is an exceptional year for sustainable development. It is the target year for achieving the MDGs and the year for agreeing on a new set of SDGs in the framework of the post-2015 Development Agenda. In September 2015, 17 SDGs will replace 8 MDGs at the United Nations Summit on the Post-2015 Development Agenda. Many of the 17 SDGs and their associated 169 targets are intertwined and closely related. There are growing calls for the Goals to be implemented through an integrated framework to use resources more efficiently and optimize desired outcomes. This lecture will frame the Water-Energy-Food Nexus perspective as a crucial planning and policy instrument for implementing the SDGs, stressing the opportunities and challenges for operationalizing the concept and highlighting the approaches undertaken by Sustainable Energy for All (SE4All) - a global partnership programme launched by the UN Secretary General to mobilize international action on the Energy Goal (i.e. SDG 7 - access to modern, affordable and sustainable energy for all).
9873940964 Full Enjoy 24/7 Call Girls Near Shangri Laās Eros Hotel, New Delhi
Ā
From MDGs to SDGs: Operationalizing the water-energy-food nexus
1. J
Vienna University of Technology, Tuesday 6 October, 2015
From MDGs to SDGs: Operationalizing the Water-
Energy-Food Nexus
Paul T. Yillia (Program Manager - Water-Energy Nexus)
2. 2
Abstract:
2015 is the target year for achieving the MDGs and the year for agreeing on a new
set of SDGs. In September 2015, 17 SDGs replaced 8 MDGs at the
United Nations Summit on the Post-2015 Development Agenda. Many of the 17
SDGs and their 169 targets are intertwined and closely related.
There are growing calls for the Goals to be implemented through an integrated
framework to use resources more efficiently and optimize desired outcomes.
This lecture will frame the Water-Energy-Food Nexus perspective as
a crucial policy and planning instrument for implementing the SDGs,
stressing the opportunities and challenges for operationalizing
the concept and highlighting the approaches undertaken by
SE4All - a global partnership programme launched by the UN Secretary
General to mobilize international action on SDG 7.
3. 3
1 Goal: Achieving Sustainable Energy for All by 2030
3 Objectives: Access, Efficiency, Renewables
4. 4
Ensuring universal
Access to modern
forms of Energy
Doubling the share
of Renewable
Energy in total
energy mix
Achieving the three
objectives of SE4Allā¦
Doubling the rate of
improvement in
Energy Efficiency
ā¦ makes many
development goals
possible
āŖ Improved health
Improved agricultural
productivity
āŖ Empowerment of
women
āŖ Business and
employment creation
āŖ Economic development
āŖ Achievement of the
Millennium
Development Goals
āŖ Lighting/appliances that
require less power
āŖ Fossil fuel resources used
more effectively
āŖ Reduced energy costs for
consumers
āŖ Redistribution of
electricity that now is
wasted or lost
āŖ More reliable electricity
systems
āŖ Affordable energy even
where grid does not
reach
āŖ New opportunities for
small entrepreneurs
āŖ Decreased variability in
energy costs
āŖ Energy security and
reduced import bills
āŖ Reduced environmental
impacts
Energy cuts across sustainable development issues
Pursuing three objectives simultaneously bring about immense benefits
5. 5
One Goal: Achieving Sustainable Energy for All by 2030
High-impact
opportunity initiatives
to mobilise multi-
stakeholder
partnerships,
commitments and
investment linked to key
Action Areas
Global Action Agenda, with a set
of Action Areas, will facilitate dialogues and
guide action towards SE4ALL goal globally
Businesses
Energy companies
Financial players
All companies
Governments
National governments
Public institutions
Cities and municipalities
Multilateral organizations
Bilateral development partners
Civil society
Organization
Academic institutions
Individuals Monitoring and Progress Tracking
to recognize achievements, share
lessons and ensure accountability
Country Action to
accelerate progress
toward nationally-
tailored sustainable
energy for all
objectives, based on
countryās own action
plans and programmes
All parties must actā¦ ā¦and work together to realize a world with Sustainable Energy for All
Energy
efficiency
Renewable
energy
Energy
access
6. 6
SE4All Global Network
ļ§ 85 Opt-in countries (including 30 initial focus countries)
ļ§ 8 Regional or Thematic Hubs
ļ§ 2 Global Facilitation Teams
ļ§ 49 Advisory Board Members
ļ§ 12 Executive Committee Members
7. 7
15partners
v1
23partners
v2
ā¢ Launched in 2013 by 15 organizations, led by the
WB, ESMAP & IEA
ā¢ GTF suggests indicators for SE4All objectives on
energy access, efficiency and renewables
Tracking SDG 7: SE4All Global Tracking Framework
8. 8
SE4All Country Action
ļ85 Partner-countries in the developing world
ļ44 Rapid Assessments/Gap Analysis done
ļ30 initial Focus Countries for 2014
ļNational Focal points drive process
ļDevelopment partners working together
Africa and Middle East (44) Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic,
Chad, Congo, Cote dāIvoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Egypt, Ethiopia ,
Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea-Bissau, Guinea-Conakry, Kenya, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Malawi,
Mali, Mauritania, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal,
Sierra Leone, Somalia, South Africa, Sudan, Swaziland, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe
Americas and Caribbean (21) Argentina, Barbados, Belize, Bolivia, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Grenada,
Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Peru, St. Vincent and the
Grenadines, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay
Asia Pacific (14) Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia, Fiji, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Mongolia, Myanmar,
Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines, Sri Lanka
Europe and CIS (6) Armenia, Kyrgyztan, Moldova, Montenegro, Tajikistan, Turkey
9. 9
ļ 27 SE4All Action Agendas and
ļ 16 SE4All Investment Prospectuses
currently under development or have already been finalized:
Action Agendas:
Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, Cote dāIvoire, DRC, Ecuador, Ethiopia,
Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Kenya, Liberia, Malawi, Mali, Nepal,
Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Tanzania, Togo,
Uganda, Zimbabwe
Investment Prospectuses:
Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Gambia, Ghana, Guatemala, Guinea,
Honduras, Kenya, Liberia, Mozambique, Myanmar, Nepal, Nicaragua, Senegal,
Tanzania
SE4All Country Action
10. 10
ā¢ Governments, business, organizations and civil society:
- Hundreds of billion dollars in commitments announced at Rio+20, benefitting, among others, some
one billion people over the next decades. European and US commitments alone means we can halve
energy poverty by 2030.
ā¢ National/Local level
ā 100 countries (85 developing countries) already involved, spanning four continents. Streamlined
process to catalyze country action: gap analysis (with support from UNDP, regional development
banks, World Bank and other partners), creation of national actions plans, implementation,
monitoring. 30 initial focus countries, in the first phase.
ā Many municipalities (e.g. cities, towns) taking strong actions for sustainable energy, e.g. through the
newly created SE4All Global Energy Efficiency Accelerator Platform.
ā¢ Regional/International level
ā EU Sustainable Energy for All Summit: Commitment to Sustainable Energy for All (500 M more people
energy access by 2030)
ā Declaration by Energy Ministers of Africa
ā Declaration by Small Island Developing States and Least Developed Countries
ā Clean Energy Ministerial commitment to SE4All
ā¢ Global processes
ā UN General Assembly: Year (2012) and Decade of Sustainable Energy for All
Rio+20: āWe are all determined to make sustainable energy for all a realityā
ā UNGA: UN Decade on Sustainable Energy for All (2014-20124)
ā OWG-SDG: Energy one of the proposed goals (SDG-7) for the global post-2015 agenda
Growing the SE4All movement:
Strong Commitments to Sustainable Energy for All
12. 12
Goal 1 End poverty in all its forms everywhere
Goal 2 End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture
Goal 3 Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages
Goal 4 Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all
Goal 5 Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls
Goal 6 Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all
Goal 7 Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all
Goal 8 Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and
decent work for all
Goal 9 Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation
Goal 10 Reduce inequality within and among countries
Goal 11 Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable
Goal 12 Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns
Goal 13 Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts*
Goal 14 Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development
Goal 15 Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests,
combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss
Goal 16 Promote peaceful and inclusive societies for sustainable development, provide access to justice for all
and build effective, accountable and inclusive institutions at all levels
Goal 17 Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable
development
Post-2015 Development Agenda
13. 13
ā¦..more ambitious agenda requires even more ambitious actions
Post-2015 Development Agenda
1st FfD, Monterrey, 2002:
$50 billion per year to pay for
the 8 MDGs.
3rd FfD, Addis Ababa, 2015:
$2.5 trillion per year needed
in developing countries to achieve the
17 SDGs (UNCTAD)
14. 14
7.1 by 2030 ensure universal access to affordable, reliable, and modern energy services
7.2 increase substantially the share of renewable energy in the global energy mix by 2030
7.3 double the global rate of improvement in energy efficiency by 2030
7.a by 2030 enhance international cooperation to facilitate access to clean energy research and technologies,
including renewable energy, energy efficiency, and advanced and cleaner fossil fuel technologies, and promote
investment in energy infrastructure and clean energy technologies
7.b by 2030 expand infrastructure and upgrade technology for supplying modern and sustainable energy services for
all in developing countries, particularly LDCs and SIDS
Investment from both the public and private
sectors will need to triple to more than $1
trillion per year to achieve SDG7 by
2030
$42 billion per year needed to meet
Africaās energy demand by 2040, including a
tenfold increase in private
investment over current levels (AfDB)
Post-2015 Development Agenda
15. 15
ā¢ āEnergy is the golden thread that connects economic growth, increased
social equity and an environment that allows the world to thrive.ā
-- UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon
ā¢ āEnding poverty and ensuring sustainable development are the
defining challenges of our time. Energy is central to both.ā
-- Jim Yong Kim - World Bank Group President
ļ§ The three objectives of SE4ALL provide an important entry point to
climate change mitigation, keeping the world below a maximum
average 2 degrees Celsius temperature rise
ļ§ Sustainable development and poverty eradication can go hand in
hand with mitigating climate risks
Energy is central to development
16. 16
Energy the single most important element for transforming
developing economies.
āAccess to sustainable energy for all is essential for strengthening economies,
eliminating poverty, protecting ecosystems, and achieving a more
equitable society. Energy is at the heart of the core interest of all each and
every country or business ā whether it is for health, education, the
empowerment of women, food production, security, the mitigation
of climate change, the creation of new jobs or the expansion of
marketsāā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦Jim Yong Kim.
Energy is central to development
17. 17
The Report of the Finance Committee is available online at
www.se4all.org/2015/01/31/financing-sustainable-energy-possible
ā¢ USD 35 billion ā Green Bonds;
ā¢ USD 30 billion ā development finance
institutions (DFIs) (co-lending);
ā¢ USD 30 billion ā development finance
institutions (DFIs) (private sector lending);
ā¢ USD 25 billion ā aggregation.
An expert committee within the SE4All Advisory Board identified the potential for catalyzing USD 120 billion of
incremental annual investment by 2020 across 4 themes:
Financing universal access to energy
21. 21
Improving coherence and reducing inconsistencies
Independently policy objectives leads to incoherence/inconsistencies
ā¢ āwater-inconsistentā energy policies
ā¢ āenergy-inconsistentā water policies
ā¢ āwater-inconsistentā food policies
ā¢ āfood-inconsistentā energy policies
Various solution options impact policy objectives in different ways
ā¢ Positive impact - help achievement of other development objectives
ā¢ Negative impact - hinder achievement of other development
objectives
ā¢ Require trade-offs among other development objectives
ā¢ No appreciable impact on other development objectives
Improved coherence requires meeting multiple policy objectives
22. 22
Nexus interactions are complex and dynamic
Nexus interactions are about management of natural resource systems:
ā¢ understanding interdependencies (depending on each other),
ā¢ constraints (imposing conditions or trade-offs) and
ā¢ synergies (mutually reinforcing or having shared benefits).
e.g. Large-scale water infrastructure may have synergetic impacts:
ā¢ producing hydropower and
ā¢ providing water storage for irrigation,
ā¢ fisheries, recreation and municipal uses
But this might happen at the expense of upstream and downstream agro-
ecological and social systems, with environmental and social implications,
such as
ā¢ loss of terrestrial ecosystems,
ā¢ displacement/resettlements of riparian residents
ā¢ loss of cultural heritage
23. 23
Some key nexus questions
ļ§ If a decision is made at the national level to increase the share of
bioenergy, what implications does this have for water, food and
energy?
ļ§ How should a hydropower dam be designed to support multiple uses
and functions in the watershed and beyond?
ļ§ How can we ensure that sectoral policies and strategies consider the
potential trade-offs and synergies they might have on other sectors?
Finding answers to these questions is a key Nexus challenge
.......the Nexus approach helps us to better understand and
systematically analyze how we can use and manage resources in light
of different and often competing interests and goals
24. 24
Same old wine in new bottles?
ļ§ Water-Energy-Food Nexus adds relatively little to already existing
integrated approaches to resources management e.g. IWRM, IRBM,
INRM, IUWRM
ļ§ IWRM arguably pursues the integrated and coordinated management
of water and land as a means of balancing different water uses, while
meeting social and ecological needs and promoting economic
development
ļ§ However, by explicitly focusing on water, there is a risk of prioritising
water-related development goals over others, thereby reinforcing
traditional sectoral approaches.
ļ§ Nexus approach considers the different dimensions of water, energy
and food equally and recognizes the interdependencies of different
resource uses to develop sustainably
25. 25
ļ§ Identify interactions among goals,
and examining different types of
interactions;
ļ§ Illuminating interactions across
sectors and showing how individual
targets might serve multiple goals;
ļ§ Showing how the achievement of
targets under one goal might affect
targets under another goal;
Nexus as an opportunity for the SDGsā¦ā¦.ā¦ā¦. to
set complimentary goals and targets that
are jointly achievable
26. 26
ā¦.. several development objectives are very
closely interrelatedā¦ā¦.
ļ§Useful to support ongoing consultations on the
SDGs; to make more informed decisions on goals,
targets and indicators;
ļ§Support the integration of goals and targets that
are interwoven and clarify how best to allocate
resources between competing needs;
ļ§Make the SDGs more efficient and cost effective
and reduce the risk that actions for achieving
targets will undermine one another;
A major MDGs mistake can be avoided for the SDGsā¦ā¦.
ā¦ā¦using the nexus as a leverage to set targets for SDGs that are
jointly achievable, i.e. the so-called ānexus targetsā
27. 27
A major MDGs mistake can be avoided for the SDGsā¦ā¦.
ļ§ MDGs identified sectoral goals, with a list of
targets under them;
ļ§ MDGs have little consideration of how efforts to
attain a goal in one sector would affect (or be
affected by) efforts in another sector;
ļ§ MDGs did not take into account the total demand
for key resources ā whether targets could be met
by existing supplies without degrading the
resource base and underlying ecosystems.
ļ§ Too much duplication of efforts and limited
coordination and partnership between/among
sectors or development agencies
ā¦ā¦using the nexus as a leverage to set targets for SDGs that are
jointly achievable, i.e. the so-called ānexus targetsā
28. 28
Global challenges are interlinkedā¦ā¦.
ļ§ Global population is expected to grow to 9 billion by 2050.
ļ§ By 2030, 3 billion more people will join the middle class and over 60%
will live in cities ā an urbanized world;
ļ§ This is expected to increase water demands by 55%, energy needs by
80%, and the worldās food demands by as much as 60%
ļ§ 1.3 billion are without electricity, 2.8 billion use biomass;
ļ§ 2.6 billion without sanitation; 0.8 billion without safe drinking water;
ļ§ 0.8 billion without adequate nutrition
31. 31
āIf we are successful in realizing the ambition in SDG7, we will be successful in
realizing the ambitions in many more of the Goals, not least of which will be SDG
13 [climate action]. This agenda is firmly rooted in the ability of a woman to
seek medical care in a hospital, knowing that the lights wonāt go out;
SDG 3. This is an agenda about being able to turn the irrigation
pump on for the small farmer in a [dry] part of the developing world SDG 2.
This is about being able to put the light on, do the homework, graduate
and contribute to society SDG 4.āā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦. Ms. Rachel Kyte
Energy should be addressed as a crosscutting issue
ā¦ā¦..and the opportunities too are interlinked
32. 32
Reducing the complexity of the nexus and ā¦ā¦.
emphasizing the significance of the ānodesā
ā¦ā¦ā¦.. the stressing not so much on integration but more so on
increasing coordination and partnershipsā¦ā¦ā¦
33. 33
Seeing the Nexus beyond the linksā¦ā¦.
ā¦..putting more emphasis on
the significance of the so-
called ānodesā
ļ§Sectors (Energy,
Agriculture, Water, Industry)
ļ§Organizations/Institutions
(UN entities, Governments,
NGOs, Businesses, Civil
Society organizations, etc.)
ā¦ā¦ā¦.. the emphasis is not so much on integration but rather on
increasing coordination, collaboration and partnershipsā¦ā¦ā¦
34. 34
Water Supply &
Sanitation
Energy &
Industry
Food &
Agriculture
Control Influence UncertaintySphereās of:
ā¦ā¦ā¦..nexus as a framework for solutions to emerge; searching for synergy and
gaining insight into plans within othersā sphere of controlā¦ā¦ā¦
Operationalize the conceptā¦ā¦.ā¦ā¦. as a framework
for solutions to emerge
37. 37
Hydropower Thermal Power Plants
Wind and Photovoltaic panels have little impact on water
Energy requirements for water
38. 38
Source: Spang (2012) A thirst for power: A global analysis of water consumption for energy production, The Center for Water-
Energy Efficiency (CWEE), University of California, Davis, United States
Water consumption factors for various energy technologies
40. 40
Responding to Energyās thirst for water
ā¦ā¦ā¦ā¦.water constraints drive three potential pathsā¦ā¦.
Pivot to water reduction
technologiesā¦ once through
cooling vs. closed-loop cooling
towers and dry air-cooling
Reduce by switching to zero
water use technologiesā¦ wind,
solar PV, gas engines, gas
turbines
Shift to alternate water
sourcesā¦ saline or brackish
water
Options
ā¦ā¦seeking alternative water sources, and exploring options for renewable
energy and efficiency improvements
Source: GE Energy, 2012
42. 42
Water requirements for energy ā drinking water supply
Surface water-based systems: pumping for distribution of treated water
dominates energy use (70-80% or more); Groundwater-based systems are
generally more energy intensive (30% more);
43. 43
Developments in energy consumption and related costs
Source: Shatat et al., 2013
Energy is the largest single expense for desalination plants; accounts for as
much as half of the total project costs. Seawater desalination US$1/m3
;
brackish water US$0.60/m3
; freshwater chlorination US$0.02/m3
44. 44
Distribution of desalination plants worldwide
The most energy-efficient desalination plants use 3.2 kWh/m3
of water; UAE is
targeting 3.7kWh/m3
; currently desalination plants in the region are using 4-6
kWh/m3
Source: Lattemann et al., 2010
45. 45
The worldās water stressed regions are also the regions with
huge potential for tapping solar power
Source: solarserver.com
46. 46
Water requirements for energy ā wastewater treatment
Energy intensity large WTPs (380,000 m3
/day) in US: 0.177 kWh/m3
for trickling
filter; 0.272 kWh/m3
for activated sludge; 0.314 kWh/m3
for advanced
treatment; 0.412 kWh/m3
for advanced treatment with nitrification
47. 47
SE4All Nexus Agenda
ā¢ Advance a better understanding of the nexus - crucial for addressing
major global challenges in the post-2015 development framework;
ā¢ Advocate increased consideration of the nexus perspective on
discussions on the post-2015 development agenda and galvanizing
global interest, e.g. international events, interviews, publications, etc.;
ā¢ Strengthening partnerships for applying the nexus perspective;
ā¢ Mainstream the nexus perspective within SE4All core activities
towards more concrete measures for increased impact;
ā¢ Identify and operationalize opportunities along the nexus interface,
especially for SE4All activities that are directly related and/or
dependent on various nexus dimensions;
49. 49
Human and institutional capacity challenges for policy coherence
ā¢ Multiple institutional gaps
ā¢ Lack of institutional incentives
ā¢ Lack of platforms/governance
mechanisms to manage trade-
offs
ā¢ Interference of lobby groups
ā¢ Absence of strategic planning
and coordination in decision
making
ā¢ Asymmetry of information and
resources among institutions
ā¢ Intense competition between
different ministries and public
agencies
51. 51
SE4All Technical Assistance Programme to Strengthen Inter-
sector Coordination (TAPSIC)
ā¢ Shifting mindsets to make sure national leaders are fully aware of
the centrality of the energy Goal for sustainable development and the
critical role energy plays for progress on many other Goals;
ā¢ Altering management approaches away from silo-based planning
and implementation toward cross-cutting and integrated approaches
on the SDGs and national strategic plans;
ā¢ Adjusting governance structures, especially sector institutions to
ensure all the ministries work together at the national level through
inter-sectoral coordination at the country level;
ā¢ Identifying and addressing capacity challenges (both human and
institutional challenges) and creating the enabling environment for
inter-sectoral policy formulation and implementation;
52. 52
Approaches to enhancing policy coherence
1. Exploring win-win (synergistic) policies
ā¢ Pursuing multiple policy objectives at the same time
Examples: increasing water and energy efficiency; lowering water
consumption through conservation, reducing on water leakages in the
distribution system, etc.
Narmada Canal: 1MW of
electricity enough to
power 1000 homes a year
54. 54
Approaches to enhancing policy coherence
2. Avoiding conflicts
ā¢ Pursuing policy objectives that do not undermine others
Examples: requiring solar hot water systems on new building (Israel); use of
waste heat from thermoelectric power plants to desalinate sea water to
produce reliable drinking water (middle east) or creating fish passes at dam
sites that would usually obstruct fish migration, etc.
55. 55
Approaches to enhancing policy coherence
3. Managing trade-offs
ā¢ Minimizing negative impact of one policy on other policies
Example: recycling effluent from bio-refineries to reduce negative
impact on freshwater ecosystems; remove environmentally harmful
subsidies like energy subsidies the exacerbate groundwater pumping
56. 56
ā¢ 100/100/100+ central and local governments/companies/financiers being mobilized to drive
the SE4All global Energy Efficiency accelerator platform towards COP21
ā¢ A unique public-private platform for energy efficiency in appliances, buildings, district
energy, industry, lighting and transportation, with more sectors being considered
57. SE4All Global EE Accelerator Platform
57
Achievement of
Global Climate
Goals
ā¢ SE4ALLās Global EE Accelerator Platform can deliver 50% of the emission
reductions required to put the world on a 2-degree pathway by 2020 (IEA)
ā¢ Targeted EE measures can reduce emissions by 1.5 Gt while generating USD 250-
350 billion in savings each year (UNEP)
ā¢ USD 8.2 trillion investments in EE are more than offset by the fuel cost savings of
USD 10.6 trillion leading to a global economic boost of USD 11.4 trillion (2012 ā
2030) (IEA)
Energy
Efficiency
Emission
Reduction
Economic
Benefits
Improvement
of Peopleās
Well-being
59. 59
Global EE Accelerator Platform
Current
Initiatives
Initiatives under
development
Vehicles Lighting Appliances
Buildings District Energy
System
Water Sector
Industry, Small-&-Medium size
Enterprises
Power Sector
60. 60
ļ§ Utilities are typically energy intensive; largest energy consumers of
municipal governments, 30-40 percent of the total energy consumed;
ļ§ Energy costs can reach 60% of total operating costs; expected to
increase by 20% in the next 15 years;
ļ§ An energy efficiency audit can identify the greatest energy-
consuming devices and/or operations for efficiency gains
Ā
NEXUS OPPORTUNITY:
ENERGY EFFICIENCY
ACCELERATOR
UTILITIES:
DRINKING WATER & WASTEWATER NEXT
STEPS
61. 61
ļ§ Drinking water and wastewater treatment plants are not primarily
designed and operated with energy efficiency as a key concern;
ļ§ Most municipal governments often overlooked energy efficiency when
energy improvement projects are undertaken;
ļ§ Upgrading water and wastewater infrastructure to reduce energy use
is a complex and typically time and capita intensive undertaking;
ļ§ Securing reliable financial assistance to install new equipment for
energy efficiency upgrades is quite challenging.
The potential to reduce energy requirements can be huge,
especially for underperforming utilities with aging infrastructure
and inefficient equipmentā¦ā¦ā¦.
62. 62
Energy is required at all stages in the treatment process
ā¦ā¦from abstraction, treatment and distribution of drinking water to collection
of raw sewage, transport, treatment and discharge of treated effluents
63. 63
ā¦ā¦also to mitigate GHG
emissions and critical air
pollutants such as CH4 & CO2
Updating technologies with
more energy efficient systems
is important to reduce costs
Utilities can recover funds for
expanding services to unserved
or poorly served areas
Multiple
benefits
Investments on energy efficiency and effective operations can
produce economic, environmental, and other benefitsā¦ā¦.
64. Intervention Energy
savings
/year
Water
savings
/year
Total cost
savings
/year
Other associated
benefits
Payback
period
South Africa
Pressure management 14M kWh 8,000M3
3.8M $US 30 % reduction in
water loss
3 months
Prepaid metering,
Behavior change
15.4M kWh 6,000M3
3.5M $US 10-95 % payment rate
increment
< 3yearrs
India
Energy Audits 3.8M kWh 336,000 $US 10 % more supply no
additional capacity
< 1 year
Brazil
Maximizing existing
pump systems
efficiency, storage
88M kWh 2.5M $US
with an
Investment
of $1.1M
88,000 new
connections over the
original baseline
4 years
ā¦ā¦if well planned, energy efficiency investments can be extremely cost
effective with short pay-back times of only a few years
64
Source: Watergy, 2007 (The Alliance to Save Energy)
65. 65
Ā
NEXUS OPPORTUNITY:
ENERGY EFFICIENCY
ACCELERATOR
UTILITIES:
DRINKING WATER & WASTEWATER NEXT
STEPS
The energy efficiency accelerator for water and wastewater utilities is designed to work
with multiple stakeholders across multiple scales
Governments Businesses Others
Relevant government ministries,
municipalities, water &
wastewater utilities, energy &
water regulators, regional
association of utilities
Global leading equipment
manufacturers, energy
services providers,
global/regional financing
institutions
Energy efficiency
advocates, international
organizations, academia,
water & energy research
institutions
66. 66
POTENTIAL SUPPORTING PARTNERS
Governments & multilateral
organizations
Private sector financing
institutions
International
organizations
Development Agencies (e.g. GIZ,
SIDA, ADA), relevant ministries
and multilateral donor entities
Veolia Water, ESCOM,
World Bank, AfDB/AWF;
ADB, IADB
SE4All, UNEP, UNIDO,
GEF, UN-Water, IWA, TU-
Vienna, IIASA, SIWI, IKI
ļ§ Key focal point: local, national and regional governments; pilot utilities;
ļ§ The private sector will play a crucial role providing equipment,
industrial expertise and market knowledge for policy &
implementation;
ļ§ Financing possibilities to be sort from global and regional development
financing institutions and mechanisms, e.g. AfDB/AWF, ADB, IADB;
67. 67
Key commitments and timeline
ļ§ Commitments from pioneering utilities on implementing operational
improvements & equipment upgrade;
ļ§ 100 governments; 100 utilities; 100 companies committed to developing
and implementing EE road maps and operational improvements and
equipment upgrade by end of Energy Decade (2024);
68. 68
SE4All HIO on water-energy-food nexus
ļ§ Develop harmonized, robust, practical and
cost-effective approaches for assessing nexus
challenges and trade-offs;
ļ§ Better integrate the nexus perspective in
policies and projects at country level;
ļ§ Document and disseminate knowledge about
nexus solutions and best practices;
ļ§ Engage international organizations and civil
society stakeholders to facilitate the
deployment of nexus knowledge,
tools/approaches and solutions.
The overall goal of the nexus HIO is to contribute to the achievement of
SE4ALL objectives by improving the awareness and knowledge about the
nexus and promoting the implementation of nexus solutions
69. 69
Nexus HIO includes the following High Impact Initiatives:
ļ§ Development of a Nexus Assessment Package (FAO);
ļ§ Policy Dialogue, Awareness and Knowledge Dissemination (BMZ);
ļ§ Promotion of sustainable integrated food energy systems (FAO);
ļ§ Sustainable energy in emergency and rehabilitation (FAO);
ļ§ Powering Agriculture Energy Grand Challenge (USAID);
ļ§ Applying the nexus for value addition in agribusiness (REEEP);
ļ§ Energy in food losses and post-harvest technologies (FAO);
Additional Partners include UNEP and the World Bank.
SE4All HIO on water-energy-food nexus
The link between water and energy goes far beyond where water and energy are needed for each otherā¦ā¦.there are additional dimensions as wellā¦ā¦ā¦..
But the nexus is not just about the linksā¦ā¦ā¦..
But the nexus is not just about the linksā¦ā¦ā¦..
The link between water and energy goes far beyond where water and energy are needed for each otherā¦ā¦.there are additional dimensions as wellā¦ā¦ā¦..
Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development&apos; was adopted at the opening of the UN Summit for Sustainable Development, or UN summit for the adoption of the post-2015 development agenda, on 25 September 2015. It is composed of:
ā¢a preamble,
ā¢a declaration,
ā¢17 SDGs and 169 supporting targets,
ā¢means of implementation (MOI) and the Global Partnership,
ā¢a framework for follow-up and review of implementation.
UN Member States developed this package during negotiations that stretched from March 2013 to August 2015.
The Summit included plenary sessions and six interactive dialogues. Numerous high-level side events and bilateral meetings took place, including an informal discussion of climate change at the Heads of State and Government level.
The link between water and energy goes far beyond where water and energy are needed for each otherā¦ā¦.there are additional dimensions as wellā¦ā¦ā¦..
It is therefore not surprising that governments are calling on the private sector, philanthropic organizations, civil society groups and individual citizens to help foot the bill for the SDGs. Governments must make good on their commitments, but private investors can make worthwhile investments in the SDGs, as well. But public and private sector investment must complement, not substitute for, one another. Most SDG sectors by their very nature are sensitive or of a public service nature, and thus care must be exercised to allow private investors to earn a return on their investment, while protecting the public interest. Attracting private investment into SDG sectors requires strong global leadership that provides clear direction and basic principles of action, sets objectives and targets, and ensures an inclusive process.
The link between water and energy goes far beyond where water and energy are needed for each otherā¦ā¦.there are additional dimensions as wellā¦ā¦ā¦..
Access to modern energy services is fundamental to human development and an investment in our collective future
A mutual fund whose assets are composed of a combination of stocks, bonds, and money market securities, rather than just one or two of these asset classes. This enables investors to diversify their holdings with a single fund. Read more: http://www.investorwords.com/493/blend_fund.html#ixzz3nmRTGVMI
Targets that compliment others; Targets that depend on others; Targets that impose conditions on others
Food Security and Nutrition (Focus Area #2): Eliminate hunger at the same time as using energy and water more efficiently in the agriculture and food sector and strengthening ecosystems. Reduce numbers in hunger by x % per annum, or by y people per annum. Nexus targets: Improve water and energy efficiency in agricultural sector by x and y% respectively per annum; Increase percentage of land under agro-ecological practices by x% by 2030; Reverse land degradation and achieve a land degradation neutral world by 2030.
Water & Sanitation (Focus Area #6): Achieve access to safe water for all; Achieve decent sanitation services for all. Reduce numbers without adequate water by x% per annum; Reduce numbers without sanitation services by y% per annum. Nexus Goal: Achieve access goals at the same time as improving management of water everywhere so as to maintain integrity of water resources and limit the energy demands of the water sector. Nexus target: Reduce losses of water in catchment areas by x% per annum. Improve management of water in key water demand sectors by y% per annum.
Energy (Focus Area #7): Access to energy for all at the same time as achieving global reductions in CO2 emissions. Target: Improve energy efficiency in all sectors by x% per annum. Achieve y% penetration of renewables by year z.
Sustainable Cities and Human Settlements (Focus Area #13): Develop new cities and settlements on sustainable principles from the outset. Progressively transform new cities to operate more sustainably working within a life-cycle approach. Target: Improve energy performance of buildings by x % towards zero carbon status; Progressively improve carbon efficiency of all transport and progressively reduce air pollution from vehicles; Use planning system to optimize land use from sustainability perspective;
Sustainable Consumption and Production (Focus Area #14): Reduce energy and other resource needs of global totality of all production chains to sustainable levels.
Decrease individual carbon (and other resources footprints) to sustainable levels. Targets: Reduce food waste/post-harvest loss by x % by 2030
Measurable steps towards reducing average individual carbon footprints (in countries where footprints currently exceed the long term sustainable level.
Climate Change (Focus Area #15): Keep temperature rise below 2 degrees while maintaining economic growth by decoupling economic growth from growth in fossil fuel emissions. Keep temperature rise below 2 degrees while maintaining economic growth by decoupling economic growth from growth in fossil fuel emissions. Target: Improve energy and water efficiency in key sectors (including buildings, transport and industry) by x% per annum; Increase penetration of renewables by x% per annum and decrease water use by y% by 2030.
The link between water and energy goes far beyond where water and energy are needed for each otherā¦ā¦.there are additional dimensions as wellā¦ā¦ā¦..
But the nexus is not just about the linksā¦ā¦ā¦..
Improved coherence requires meeting multiple policy objectives
Improving water security (managing risk of too little, too much, too polluted water and ensuring resilience of freshwater ecosystems)
Increasing energy security
Increasing food security
Mitigating and adapting to climate change
By describing the complex and interrelated nature of our global resource systems, the Nexus approach helps us to better understand and systematically analyze how we can use and manage resources in light of different and often competing interests and goals
By describing the complex and interrelated nature of our global resource systems, the Nexus approach helps us to better understand and systematically analyze how we can use and manage resources in light of different and often competing interests and goals
The link between water and energy goes far beyond where water and energy are needed for each otherā¦ā¦.there are additional dimensions as wellā¦ā¦ā¦..
But the nexus is not just about the linksā¦ā¦ā¦..
The MDGs had a remarkably successful in focusing attention and mobilizing resources to address major gaps in human developmentā¦ā¦. However,
MDGs identified sectoral goals, with a list of targets under them;
MDGs have little consideration of how efforts to attain a goal in one sector would affect (or be affected by) efforts in another sector;
MDGs did not take into account the total demand for key resources ā whether targets could be met by existing supplies without degrading the resource base and underlying ecosystems.
Too much duplication of efforts and limited coordination and partnership between/among sectors or development agencies
The link between water and energy goes far beyond where water and energy are needed for each otherā¦ā¦.there are additional dimensions as wellā¦ā¦ā¦..
These are often the same people without access to water and sanitation, the same without sufficient access to food ā the so-called bottom billion
These are often the same people without access to water and sanitation, the same without sufficient access to food ā the so-called bottom billion
Charles O. Holliday, Jr., Chair of the Executive Committee of Sustainable Energy for All, today announced that Rachel Kyte has been selected as Chief Executive Officer of the Sustainable Energy for All (SE4All) initiative. Ms. Kyte currently serves as the World Bank Groupās Vice President and Special Envoy for Climate Change. Her appointment is effective 1 January 2016
But the nexus is not just about the linksā¦ā¦ā¦..
By describing the complex and interrelated nature of our global resource systems, the Nexus approach helps us to better understand and systematically analyze how we can use and manage resources in light of different and often competing interests and goals
Drinking water and wastewater utilities are typically energy intensive. They are the largest energy consumers of municipal governments, accounting for some 30-40 percent of the total energy consumed. Energy costs can reach 60% of total operating costs of utilities and this is expected to increase by 20% in the next 15 years due to population growth, improvements in access to safe drinking water and stiffer regulations on water quality standards. An energy efficiency audit can identify the greatest energy-consuming devices and/or operations at a utility and reveal the necessary physical and operational improvements that are needed for efficiency gains.
Drinking water and wastewater utilities are typically energy intensive. They are the largest energy consumers of municipal governments, accounting for some 30-40 percent of the total energy consumed. Energy costs can reach 60% of total operating costs of utilities and this is expected to increase by 20% in the next 15 years due to population growth, improvements in access to safe drinking water and stiffer regulations on water quality standards. An energy efficiency audit can identify the greatest energy-consuming devices and/or operations at a utility and reveal the necessary physical and operational improvements that are needed for efficiency gains.
The success of Sustainable Energy for All (SE4ALL) on achieving energy targets is closely interwoven with several other development objectives. The means (i.e. policies, regulations, technology and institutions) by which SE4All energy objectives are pursued has an impact on food and water security, for example. It will also have implications for health and security and it will impact equity and the conditions for women.
Similarly, technology choice for energy provision can have severe implications for water security. For example, photovoltaic panels and wind turbines require little water and are generally much more water efficient than conventional sources of electricity. Solar thermal, biomass, geothermal and carbon sequestration and storage on the other hand can be thirsty sources of electricity, depending on the cooling technologies implemented, and can increase the water intensity of electricity supply.
water and energy are inextricably linked; ā¦ā¦.. water is needed for primary energy extraction and processingā¦electricity generation etcā¦..
Thermoelectric power plants can receive heat from a variety of sources, including coal, nuclear, natural gas, oil, biomass (e.g., wood and crop waste), concentrated solar energy, and geothermal energy. Hence, the water requirement of a thermoelectric power plant is largely driven by the characteristics of the fuel used and the type of cooling technology installed. Compared to fossil fuel power plants, nuclear power plants require the largest water withdrawals per unit of electricity produced. Gas-fired power plants are the least water intensive.
Measures to further reduce water for energy:
Reduce fresh water use per barrel of production
Maximize water recycling
Where possible, avoid using fresh water by using water from deep saline water zones or recycled industrial wastewater
Develop new technologies that will greatly reduce or eliminate the need for water in oil sands production
But the nexus is not just about the linksā¦ā¦ā¦..
water and energy are inextricably linked; ā¦ā¦.. water is needed for primary energy extraction and processingā¦electricity generation etcā¦..
Energy requirements represent a substantial cost for the operations of drinking water and wastewater utilities, as it is typically required at all stages in the treatment process; from abstraction, treatment and distribution of drinking water to collection of raw sewage, transport, treatment and discharge of treated effluents. In general, larger systems (to a limit) tend to be less energy intensive than smaller ones. Electricity use in administrative and production buildings of WWUs, such as lighting and space conditioning, is a small percentage of a WWUās overall energy use. With the exception of gravity-fed systems, pumping for distribution of treated water dominates the energy use of surface water-based supply systems, usually accounting for 70% - 80% or more of the overall electricity consumption. The remaining electricity usage is split between raw water pumping and the treatment process. Groundwater-based supply systems are generally more energy intensive than surface water-based systems because of higher pumping needs for water extraction (on average, about 30 percent difference in the United States). On the other hand, groundwater usually requires much less treatment than surface water, often only for the chlorination of raw water, which requires very little electricity. Using these aggregate indicators for inter-utility comparison is usually fraught with problems because they are significantly affected by system operation conditions (e.g., daily flow, water main length, mix of water sources, distribution elevation, use of gravity for distribution or collection, etc.) and processing technologies (e.g., level of treatment for wastewater). For example, electricity intensity of water supply in the State of New York (varying from 0.158 to 0.285 kWh/m3-water produced) is significantly below the United States national average of 0.370 kWh/m3 primarily due to the predominance of surface water sources and a large share of gravity-fed distribution in New York (http://www.iwawaterwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Articles/EnergyEfficiancyforUrbanWaterandWastewaterServices).
Energy requirements represent a substantial cost for the operations of drinking water and wastewater utilities, as it is typically required at all stages in the treatment process; from abstraction, treatment and distribution of drinking water to collection of raw sewage, transport, treatment and discharge of treated effluents. In general, larger systems (to a limit) tend to be less energy intensive than smaller ones. Electricity use in administrative and production buildings of WWUs, such as lighting and space conditioning, is a small percentage of a WWUās overall energy use. With the exception of gravity-fed systems, pumping for distribution of treated water dominates the energy use of surface water-based supply systems, usually accounting for 70% - 80% or more of the overall electricity consumption. The remaining electricity usage is split between raw water pumping and the treatment process. Groundwater-based supply systems are generally more energy intensive than surface water-based systems because of higher pumping needs for water extraction (on average, about 30 percent difference in the United States). On the other hand, groundwater usually requires much less treatment than surface water, often only for the chlorination of raw water, which requires very little electricity. Using these aggregate indicators for inter-utility comparison is usually fraught with problems because they are significantly affected by system operation conditions (e.g., daily flow, water main length, mix of water sources, distribution elevation, use of gravity for distribution or collection, etc.) and processing technologies (e.g., level of treatment for wastewater). For example, electricity intensity of water supply in the State of New York (varying from 0.158 to 0.285 kWh/m3-water produced) is significantly below the United States national average of 0.370 kWh/m3 primarily due to the predominance of surface water sources and a large share of gravity-fed distribution in New York (http://www.iwawaterwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Articles/EnergyEfficiancyforUrbanWaterandWastewaterServices).
Conventional Wastewater Treatment Process: Although there are many variations of wastewater treatment plants, most will have the following steps: preliminary treatment, primary treatment, secondary treatment, tertiary treatment, disinfection, and solids handling. Energy usage of municipal wastewater treatment varies substantially, depending on treatment technologies, which often are dictated by pollution control requirements and land availability. Advanced wastewater treatment with nitrification can use more than twice as much energy as the relatively simple trickling filter treatment. Pond-based treatment is low energy but requires large land area. The estimated energy intensity for typical large wastewater treatment facilities (about 380,000 m3/day) in the United States are 0.177 kWh/m3-treated for trickling filter; 0.272 kWh/m3 for activated sludge; 0.314 kWh/m3 for advanced treatment; and 0.412 kWh/m3 for advanced treatment with nitrification. The ascending energy intensity of the four different processes is due mainly to aeration (for the latter three treatment processes) and additional pumping requirements for additional treatment of the wastewater. In fact, for activated sludge treatment, a commonly used process in newer municipal wastewater treatment plants, aeration alone often accounts for about 50% of the overall treatment process energy use.
Agrifood sector ā prominent single subsector within the nexus, accounting for some 70% freshwater withdrawal, 30% energy demand, and 12-30% GHG emissions; With global food demands expected to increase as much as 60% by 2050, the sector is facing unprecedented resource pressures; Nexus-driven initiatives within the agrifood sector could target renewable energy development & energy efficiency improvements;
SE4All partners for the GTF
Improved coherence requires meeting multiple policy objectives
Improving water security (managing risk of too little, too much, too polluted water and ensuring resilience of freshwater ecosystems)
Increasing energy security
Increasing food security
Mitigating and adapting to climate change
Improved coherence requires meeting multiple policy objectives
Improving water security (managing risk of too little, too much, too polluted water and ensuring resilience of freshwater ecosystems)
Increasing energy security
Increasing food security
Mitigating and adapting to climate change
Improving governance and partnership
Efforts to better coordinate water and energy policies examples of good practice
ā¢Brazil: to limit negative impact on freshwater ecosystems, legal framework requires prior authorization from Water Management Agency (ANA) for concession to exploit hydropower potential
ā¢Spain: the national water Council includes representatives from the energy sector
ā¢England and Wales: Environmental Agency working with the Energy saving Trust to develop policy to reduce hot water use in the home
ā¢Australia: researchers have created the Climate-Energy-Water Links project to add the energy dimension to water resources planning and policy
Improved coherence requires meeting multiple policy objectives
Improving water security (managing risk of too little, too much, too polluted water and ensuring resilience of freshwater ecosystems)
Increasing energy security
Increasing food security
Mitigating and adapting to climate change
Drinking water and wastewater utilities are typically energy intensive. They are the largest energy consumers of municipal governments, accounting for some 30-40 percent of the total energy consumed. Energy costs can reach 60% of total operating costs of utilities and this is expected to increase by 20% in the next 15 years due to population growth, improvements in access to safe drinking water and stiffer regulations on water quality standards. An energy efficiency audit can identify the greatest energy-consuming devices and/or operations at a utility and reveal the necessary physical and operational improvements that are needed for efficiency gains.
Energy requirements represent a substantial cost for the operations of drinking water and wastewater utilities, as it is typically required at all stages in the treatment process; from abstraction, treatment and distribution of drinking water to collection of raw sewage, transport, treatment and discharge of treated effluents. The potential to reduce energy requirements in the operations of utilities can be huge, especially for underperforming utilities with aging infrastructure and inefficient equipment. However, this potential remains largely under-exploited. Typically, drinking water and wastewater treatment plants are not primarily designed and operated with energy efficiency as a key concern. Therefore, they are often overlooked when municipal governments undertake energy improvement projects. Besides, upgrading drinking water and wastewater infrastructure to reduce energy use is a complex and typically time and capita intensive undertaking. Furthermore, securing reliable financial assistance for municipalities to install new equipment for energy efficiency upgrades in their utilities is quite challenging.
Energy requirements represent a substantial cost for the operations of drinking water and wastewater utilities, as it is typically required at all stages in the treatment process; from abstraction, treatment and distribution of drinking water to collection of raw sewage, transport, treatment and discharge of treated effluents. Electricity is a critical input for delivering municipal water and wastewater services. Electricity costs are usually between 5% - 30% of total operating costs among water and wastewater utilities (WWUs) worldwide. The share is usually higher in developing countries and can go up to 40% or more in some countries (e.g. India and Bangladesh). Such energy costs translate into high and often unsustainable operating costs, which directly affect the financial health of WWUs, puts strains on public/ municipal budgets, and can increase tariffs on their customer base. The potential to reduce energy requirements in the operations of utilities can be huge, especially for underperforming utilities with aging infrastructure and inefficient equipment. However, this potential remains largely under-exploited. Typically, drinking water and wastewater treatment plants are not primarily designed and operated with energy efficiency as a key concern. Therefore, they are often overlooked when municipal governments undertake energy improvement projects. Besides, upgrading drinking water and wastewater infrastructure to reduce energy use is a complex and typically time and capita intensive undertaking. Furthermore, securing reliable financial assistance for municipalities to install new equipment for energy efficiency upgrades in their utilities is quite challenging.
In developing countries, WWUs are commonly owned and operated by the government. Many are run by city authorities. As such, electricity used for provision of water and wastewater services can have a significant impact on a municipal governmentsā budget and fiscal outlook. In India, for example, water supply was reported to be the largest expenditure item among all municipal services. Programs designed to lead to reductions in WWU operating costs can thus become an attractive proposition for both utilities and their municipal owners, potentially creating fiscal space to grapple with other socioeconomic priorities while also lessening the upward pressure on water and wastewater tariffs. Improving energy efficiency is at the core of measures to reduce operational cost at WWUs. Since energy represents the largest controllable operational expenditure of most WWUs, and many energy efficiency measures have a payback period of less than five years, investing in energy efficiency supports quicker and greater expansion of clean water access for the poor by making the system cheaper to operate.
Achieve access goals at the same time as improving management of water everywhere to maintain integrity of water resources and limit the energy demands of the water sector. Target: Reduce losses of water in catchment areas by x% per annum. Improve management of water in key water demand sectors by y% per annum.
Drinking water and wastewater utilities are typically energy intensive. They are the largest energy consumers of municipal governments, accounting for some 30-40 percent of the total energy consumed. Energy costs can reach 60% of total operating costs of utilities and this is expected to increase by 20% in the next 15 years due to population growth, improvements in access to safe drinking water and stiffer regulations on water quality standards. An energy efficiency audit can identify the greatest energy-consuming devices and/or operations at a utility and reveal the necessary physical and operational improvements that are needed for efficiency gains.
There are already some existing networks, resources and tools that have been deployed globally to support drinking water and wastewater utilities in their transition to energy efficient and GHG-reducing technologies and operations. The activities of those networks can be supported or complimented and scaled-up. In particular, the International Water Association (IWA) launched an international initiative - the Water and Wastewater Companies for Climate Mitigation (WaCCliM) Project - which is designed to work across local, national and international levels, engaging with national governments, water and wastewater utilities in three pilot treatment facilities in Mexico, Peru and Thailand. Other key partners include the International Climate Initiative (IKI) and the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (BMUB). Additional contributors for the accelerator will include public organizations who strive for the same goals, such as World Bank, major regional development banks and private banks, as well as energy efficiency advocacy groups, academia, research institutions and consultancy firms. Manufacturers and industry associations will play a crucial role providing industrial expertise and market knowledge on policy development and implementation. The accelerator will offer best practices, information and knowledge on policies and experience from the implementation of earlier efficiency improvement projects to show how the water sector can reduce its greenhouse gas emissions and contribute to climate change mitigation.
The key near-term milestone is securing commitment from 10 pioneering governments and municipalities to participate in the SE4All Energy Efficiency Accelerator for Drinking Water & Wastewater Utilities June 2015 and a total of 50 governments and municipalities by December 2016. This commitment will contribute to the overall SE4All objective of doubling the rate of energy efficiency improvement by 2030, and include the commitment to implement and upgrade equipment by 2020 through an ongoing SE4All collaborative process with public and private sector stakeholders. In particular, regions of the world with rapidly increasing needs for water and wastewater services, but having underperforming utilities with aging infrastructure and inefficient equipment and operations will be encouraged to participate. Commitments from partner institutions and the private sector will be solicited in the form of policy knowledge, resources and expert assistance. Financial institutions, both public and private, will make commitments to support funding for policy development, implementation, project execution and performance tracking. In addition, global and local manufacturers will be encouraged to participate in energy efficiency improvement projects.
Energy requirements represent a substantial cost for the operations of drinking water and wastewater utilities, as it is typically required at all stages in the treatment process; from abstraction, treatment and distribution of drinking water to collection of raw sewage, transport, treatment and discharge of treated effluents. The potential to reduce energy requirements in the operations of utilities can be huge, especially for underperforming utilities with aging infrastructure and inefficient equipment. However, this potential remains largely under-exploited. Typically, drinking water and wastewater treatment plants are not primarily designed and operated with energy efficiency as a key concern. Therefore, they are often overlooked when municipal governments undertake energy improvement projects. Besides, upgrading drinking water and wastewater infrastructure to reduce energy use is a complex and typically time and capita intensive undertaking. Furthermore, securing reliable financial assistance for municipalities to install new equipment for energy efficiency upgrades in their utilities is quite challenging.
Energy requirements represent a substantial cost for the operations of drinking water and wastewater utilities, as it is typically required at all stages in the treatment process; from abstraction, treatment and distribution of drinking water to collection of raw sewage, transport, treatment and discharge of treated effluents. The potential to reduce energy requirements in the operations of utilities can be huge, especially for underperforming utilities with aging infrastructure and inefficient equipment. However, this potential remains largely under-exploited. Typically, drinking water and wastewater treatment plants are not primarily designed and operated with energy efficiency as a key concern. Therefore, they are often overlooked when municipal governments undertake energy improvement projects. Besides, upgrading drinking water and wastewater infrastructure to reduce energy use is a complex and typically time and capita intensive undertaking. Furthermore, securing reliable financial assistance for municipalities to install new equipment for energy efficiency upgrades in their utilities is quite challenging.