Connecting the pieces: using ORCIDs to improve research impact and repositories
1. Connecting the pieces:
Using ORCIDs to improve research impact and
repositories
Mohamed Ba-Essa, Daryl Grenz, Thibaut Lery and J. K. Vijayakumar
ORCID-CASRAI Joint conference
2. Agenda
Ø About
King
Abdullah
University
of
Science
and
Technology
(KAUST)
Ø Establishment
phases
of
KAUST
Research
Repository
Ø Development
of
repository
policies
Ø Repository
integra@on
with
external
systems
Ø Research
evalua@on
workflow
Ø Community
engagement:
role
of
the
university
library
Ø Next
steps
3. Our
inten@on
is
to
create
an
enduring
model
for
advanced
educa@on
and
scien@fic
research.
7. Why
establishing
Research
Repository
Ø Persistent
access
to
university
intellectual
assets,
including
grey
literature
(e.g.,
technical
reports,
conference
papers,
theses
etc.)
and
research
data,
in
order
to
preserve
and
share
scienDfic
knowledge
created
at
KAUST.
Ø Showcase
the
intellectual
output
of
KAUST
research,
development
of
internaDonal
research
networks
and
collaboraDons,
support
graduate
student
and
post-‐doc
recruitment.
Ø Expanding
impact
of
KAUST
research,
which
contributes
to
increased
awareness
of
and
growing
presDge
for
our
new
and
ambiDous
university.
13. Developing
Open
Access
tools
Ø Cover
sheet,
to
provide
accuracy
in
citaDon,
clarity
about
manuscript
versions
and
licenses,
and
links
to
the
publisher
and
the
repository.
Ø Author
addendum,
each
university
research
author
is
advised
to
append
the
KAUST
addendum
when
signing
the
publicaDon
agreement
with
the
publisher.
Ø Waiver
form,
the
university
will
grant
a
waiver
for
open
access,
upon
author
request,
but
author
sDll
needs
to
submit
to
the
repository.
Ø Submission
methods
-‐ Online
Submission
-‐ Email
submission
-‐ Auto
harves@ng
14. Repository
Content
LIBRARY
SERVICES
•
PreservaDon
•
OrganizaDon
•
Metadata/
Discovery
•
Access
management
•
Rights
management
•
Backup
&
recovery
Search
engines
(e.g.,
Google)
Metadata
harvesters
KAUST
Library
catalog
KAUST
faculty
and
researcher
works
KAUST
student
theses
and
dissertaDons
KAUST
Digital
Archive
Data/text
mining
Labs
Restricted
Access
• Release
date
• User
type
Research
Centers
Academic
Divisions
Graduate
Program
Coordinators
Library
Staff
works
17. ORCID
IDs
within
the
repository
• Added
along
within
contributor
names
in
submission
forms
or
through
metadata
update.
• Retrieval
via
Crossref
when
available
along
with
other
metadata
(based
on
DOI).
§ AddiDonal
opDon:
search
and
retrieval
via
the
ORCID
public
API.
18. ORCID
IDs
within
the
repository
• Linked
display
on
item
pages
and
in
author
browse
lists:
• Currently
59%
of
arDcles
and
conference
papers
in
the
repository
have
an
ORCID
for
at
least
one
author.
19. Using
the
ORCID
member
API
• Internally
developed
integraDon
using
PHP
and
MySQL.
• Goal:
§ Provide
a
simple
method
for
KAUST
researchers
to
create
an
ORCID
ID
and
populate
their
ORCID
profile
with
affiliaDon
and
work
informaDon.
• Process:
§ Emails
with
custom
link
requesDng
ORCID
creaDon
or
idenDficaDon.
Follow-‐up
emails
to
those
who
did
not
create
an
ORCID.
20. Using
the
ORCID
member
API
• Results:
§ 82%
of
faculty,
52%
of
postdocs
and
13%
of
research
scienDsts
now
have
ORCID
IDs.
§ 78%
of
those
with
ORCID
IDs
have
granted
permissions
to
KAUST
to
add
informaDon
to
their
ORCID
profile.
• Next
steps:
§ IniDate
the
same
process
for
current
students.
§ Develop
procedure
for
incoming
faculty
and
students.
21. Inclusion
of
sources
of
research
usage
metrics
• Repository
usage
staDsDcs
derived
from
Google
AnalyDcs.
22. Inclusion
of
sources
of
research
usage
metrics
• Scopus
citaDon
counts
• Altmetric.com
donut
badge
for
individual
items.
25. STRATEGIC PLANNING
Science Advisory Board
Process and Standards
RESEARCH DATA
REPORTING
Data Analysis
Bibliometrics tools
Forecasting
DATA MANAGEMENT
Research Data Management
with an institutional CRIS
Research Infrastructures
Data Monitoring
EVALUATION
Research Center Evaluations
Program Evaluations
Process & Standards
VPR
&
Presidency
To adjust To monitor
To presentTo assess
Research Evaluation Workflow
26. KAUST
Importance of collaborations in KAUST publications: comparison with
key international universities
Scival
data
2014
27. Influence of the type of collaboration on citations
0"
2"
4"
6"
8"
10"
12"
Ins+tu+onal" Na+onal" Interna+onal" Corporate"
Cita+ons"per"ar+cle"
Type"of"collabora+on"
Analysis
of
the
number
of
citaDons
per
publicaDon
for
various
collaboraDon
types
for
86
InsDtuDons
that
had
significant
collaboraDons
(generaDng
10
publicaDons
or
more)
with
KAUST
researchers
Scopus
data
2011-‐2013
28. 2 key bibliometrics indicators
• PublicaDons
in
Top
Journal
PercenDles
• Share
of
publicaDons
that
are
in
the
top
10%
most
cited
journals
• Field-‐Weighted
CitaDon
Impact
• The
raDo
of
citaDons
received
relaDve
to
the
expected
world
average
for
the
subject
field,
publicaDon
type
and
publicaDon
year.
• Indicator
used
to
balance
citaDon
differences
between
scienDfic
fields
• Index
of
1.0
=
“World
average”
• Index
of
1.5
=
50%
more
than
the
World
average
• Index
of
2.0
=
100%
more
than
the
World
average
29. Field-Weighted Citation Impact
(Scopus data from 2011 to 2014, excluding self-citations)
Energy
Material
sciences
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
CAMBRIDGE
GEORGIA
TECH
ETH
ZURICH
HKUST
MIT
KAUST
CALTECH
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
HKUST
CAMBRIDGE
ETH
ZURICH
GEORGIA
TECH
KAUST
MIT
CALTECH
30. Based on
Scopus data
between
2011 and 2013
(excluding
self-citations)
Benchmarking against other Universities
outside the Kingdom
0"
0.5"
1"
1.5"
2"
2.5"
3"
3.5"
Chemistry*
Chemical*Engineering*
Biochemistry,*gene4cs*and*Molecular*
Biology*
Materials*Science*
Physics*and*Astronomy*
Engineering*Energy*
Agricultural*and*Biological*science*
Environmental*Science*
Computer*Science*
Mathema4cs*
Field*Weighted*Cita4on*Impact*(2011D2014)*
KAUST*
HKUST*
MIT*
ETH*ZURICH*
GEORGIA*TECH*
CALTECH*
31. Benchmarking against other Universities
Which group is KAUST belonging to?
Based on
Scopus data
between
2011 and 2013
(excluding
self-citations)
CALTECH'
Carnegie'Mellon'
EPFL'
ETH'Zurich'
GeorgiaTech'
Harvard'
HKUST'
Istanbul'Univ.'
King'Abdulaziz'
KAUST'
KFUPM'
KAIST'
Lehigh'Univ.'
MIT'
NU'Singapore'
Princeton'
Shanghai'J.'Univ.'
Texas'A&M'
Berkeley'
Cambridge'
Copenhagen'
Univ.'of'Tokyo'
0'
1'
2'
3'
4'
5'
6'
7'
8'
9'
10'
0' 10' 20' 30' 40'
CitaWons'per'publicaWons'
PublicaWons'in'Top'10'Journal'PercenWles'(%)'
33. • Value
of
using
citaDon
databases
in
the
literature
search
• Understanding
citaDon
metrics
and
tools
(h-‐Index,
Impact
Factor,
Altmetrics
etc.)
• Role
of
publicaDons
in
effecDng
insDtuDonal
rankings
• Understanding
researcher
profiling
(ORCID,
Google
Scholar
etc.)
• Benefits
of
open
access
and
explanaDon
of
how
to
use
the
insDtuDonal
repository
• Academic
honesty,
plagiarism,
and
the
use
of
similarity
checking
tools
34. Benefits
to
Researchers
• Improves
their
understanding
of
how
to
communicate
their
research
• Helps
to
have
organized
scholarly
profile
and
presence
• Guides
to
navigate
in
the
complex
aspects
of
the
changing
scholarly
communicaDons
landscape
• Helps
in
connecDng
the
pieces
of
the
research
life
cycle
InsDtuDonal
Benefits
• Enhancing
the
profile
of
individual
researchers
will
improve
their
research
impact
and
the
reputaDon
of
our
insDtuDon,
• Helps
in
research
funding,
faculty
evaluaDons
and
recruitment.
Feedback
35. Middle East Outreach
PromoDng
open
access
and
research
service
iniDaDves
Aimed
at
professional
librarians
and
the
academic
community
Special
Library
AssociaDon
Arab
Gulf
Chapter
conferences
in
2013
and
2014
American
Library
AssociaDon’s
Sharjah
Book
Fair
conference
in
2014
and
proposed
for
2015.
36. Future
• More
training
programs
within
the
university.
• More
outreach
programs
in
the
region.
• Promote
good
pracDces
in
Research
Data
Management
(RDM).
• Services
and
iniDaDves
around
RDM.
• Increased
importance
of
ReputaDon
Management
• Evolving
scholarly
record
–
transiDon
from
an
arDcle
to
a
package
(of
arDcle
and
associated
video,
data,
sorware
methods,
other
media
etc)