The CERI OECD/National Science Foundation International Conference took place in Paris, at the OECD Headquarters on 23-24 January 2012. Here the presentation of Session 1, Brain, Plasticity, and Learning, Item 2.
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Creating Better Learners by Driving Neuroplasticity
1. Améliorer les performances des apprenants grâce à la
plasticité cérébrale
Prof. Andrea A. Chiba University of California, San Diego
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
3. The goal of our Center:
To understand the role of time and timing in
learning
From the neuronal
and millisecond scale…
…to the brain
and year-long scale
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
4. Time is an organizing principle of the world
Le temps est un principe organisateur du monde
Ο χρόνος είναι µια οργανωτική αρχή του κόσµου
• Sequences underlie much of
what we learn
• The brain is organized 5+3x6=48 =oops!
according to temporal patterns
as is our world
• The ability of the brain and the
world to integrate is crucial
THE CHILD JUMPED ON THE FROG.
THE FROG JUMPED ON THE CHILD.
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
5. Time is an organizing principle of the brain
STDP Spikes Local Field Potentials Cortical EEG
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
6. How are temporal sequences organized?
Temporal pattern & sequence
wi
Elements A B C D
Dt Dt Dt
1 2 3
time
● Temporal patterns are learned and recognized
● Temporal pattern recognition is basic for perception,
language, and cognitive processing
● Deficiency in rapid temporal processing underlies
some learning deficits
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECDInitiative 1
2012
7. How do brain circuits learn sequences?
Naive
model
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
OECD 2012
8. Time matters for processing…
say
Frequency
stay
100 ms
Time (milliseconds)
These wave forms are identical except for the artificially
inserted gap and a compensating shrinkage of the waveform.
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
9. Time matters for processing…
say
Frequency
stay
100 ms
Time (milliseconds)
These wave forms are identical except for the artificially
inserted gap and a compensating shrinkage of the waveform.
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
10. Time matters for learning…
100
95
90
85
Percent Correct
SYLLABLE Tone Duration =
80
RANGE 75 msec
75 Tone 1 = 100 Hz,
PHONEME Tone 2 = 300 Hz
70 Control
RANGE
65 Language Impaired
< 40ms - Phonemes
60 40-350ms - Syllables
55
50
150
305
428
947
1466
1985
3023
3543
4062
8
15
30
60
Tallal & Piercy (1973) Nature.
Interstimulus Interval (ISI) in milliseconds
6-8 year old language impaired children can t do
the task at short ISI s: correlation, or causation?
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
11. Timescales of investigation
Ba
Da
Whisking
10s of msec Spikes
STDP
Phoneme processing
Neuromodulation
Motor action
100s of msec Perceptual decisions
Brain rhythms
Action selection
Seconds Prediction
Temporal Diff. learning
Reinforcement
Minutes LTP
Days Neurogenesis
Weeks Spacing effects
Years Expertise
Temporal Dynamics of Learning 11
OECD 2012
12. Clarke
County
School
District
• The
Clarke
County
School
District
of
GA
implemented
the
Fast
ForWord
products
in
eight
schools
during
the
2006-‐2007
and
2007-‐2008
school
years.
• 2,257
students
had
their
reading
achievement
assessed
with
the
Criterion-‐
Referenced
Competency
Tests
(CRCT).
Some
students
used
Fast
ForWord
products,
others
served
as
a
comparison
group.
• Based
on
CRCT
results,
on
average,
the
Fast
ForWord
parMcipants
made
greater
gains
than
the
comparison
group.
• Following
Fast
ForWord
parMcipaMon
in
2006-‐2007,
40%
of
students
who
were
not
proficient
in
2006
crossed
the
proficiency
threshold
in
2007,
compared
to
27%
of
the
students
in
the
comparison
group.
These
results
were
replicated
by
students
who
first
used
Fast
ForWord
products
during
the
2007-‐2008
school
year:
42%
of
the
parMcipants
crossed
the
proficiency
threshold
in
2008,
compared
to
29%
of
the
students
in
the
comparison
group.
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
13. Clarke County School District: CRCT Results
806
804
Proficiency Threshold
802
Scale Score 800
798
796
794
792
2
0
2006 2007 2008
CRCT
Wave 1- Started Fast ForWord in 2006-2007
Wave 2- Started Fast ForWord in 2007-2008
Wave 3 - Did not start Fast ForWord
before 2008 CRCT
m08clrk03mf
longitudinal scaled score CRCT
wave 1 n=571
wave 2 n=758
wave 3 n=928
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
14. Brain Activation Improves Stimulus Fidelity in the Cortex
● Rodent Audition (Harris): Neural encoding of auditory temporal
patterns is highly nonlinear and depends on brain state.
Inactive brain state
synchronized EEG,
sleep, anesthesia
Active brain state
desynchronized EEG,
alertness, attention
State for effective
coding and learning
of temporal patterns?
From the Harris Lab
AM noise stimulus
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECDInitiative 1
2012
15. Rodent Audition (Harris): Neural encoding of auditory temporal
patterns is highly nonlinear and depends on brain state.
clicks clicks
Inactive Active
brain brain
state state
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECDInitiative 1
2012
17. Burst Spiking of a Single Cortical Neuron Modifies Global
Brain State
Li, Poo, and Dan, Science 2009
Temporal Dynamics of Learning Initiative 2
OECD 2012
18. Timescales of investigation
Ba
Da
Whisking
10s of msec Spikes
STDP
Phoneme processing
Neuromodulation
Motor action
100s of msec Perceptual decisions
Brain rhythms
Action selection
Seconds Prediction
Temporal Diff. learning
Reinforcement
Minutes LTP
Days Neurogenesis
Weeks Spacing effects
Years Expertise
Temporal Dynamics of Learning 18
OECD 2012
19. Gamma Power and Language Learning
April Benasich
• Your brain is a giant oscillator
(Buzsaki)
• EEG power in the gamma band of
this oscillation (~40Hz) has been
implicated in attention,
perception, memory, language,
and neural synchrony
• Gamma power increases
throughout development.
• Can we use gamma power in
toddlers to predict language
ability?
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
20. Resting Gamma Power at 36 months of age predictsPredicts
Resting Gamma Power In the Frontal Regions language
Preschool and 5 yearsScores
skills at 4 Language of age
From Benasich Lab with Harris
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
21. Brain dynamics matter for learning…
• These results suggests brain
dynamics are important for
cognitive function
• Early diagnosis means we can
now think about early
interventions - perhaps a
FastForWord for toddlers
that can ameliorate the
problems that these children
face.
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
22. • In an inactivated state, cortical processing of the
stimulus is degraded in Auditory, Visual, and
Tactile modalities.
• Thalamic processing of the stimulus is
maintained in the inactive state for auditory
information but not for visual.
• Stimulus fidelity is enhanced by an activated
brain state for all modalities.
• Cortical activation can be achieved via
neuromodulation from a subcortical source
(Basal Forebrain Acetylcholine) or locally (a
single bursting cortical neuron) or from training.
• Natural activation in the form of gamma
oscillations in babies predicts later language
acquisition.
• Early identification can allow for early
intervention.
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
23. How can we drive temporal processing at rapid timescales, while also driving
group synchrony ?
Gamelan, Attention, and Synchrony!
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
24. Synchronizing with an isochronous beat
Adjust following interval
Accordingly:
10s of ms
Target beat
Filter out
Non-targets
Player
Monitor unison
Estimate and with target beat:
reproduce interval: 10s of ms
100s of ms
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
25. 10s of ms Details of note shaping, beat to beat alignment
100s of ms Note to note and beat to beat movement
10s of seconds Rhythmic or melodic motives or themes
minutes Melodic phrases and chord progressions
10s of minutes - hours Musical structures and compositions
Accurate synchrony and integration
Amongst players, too
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
26. Research Questions
1) Does ability to pay attention correlate with ability to synchronize in a group setting?
2) Is this correlation, if it exists, solely due to differences in attentional allocation
or do underlying differences in time processing also exist?
3) Since it is possible to improve one s ability to synchronize through group music
practice, can such improvements translate into measurable improvements in
attentional performance?
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
27. The Gamelan Project – preliminary study
Does ability to pay attention correlate with ability to synchronize in a group setting?
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
31. Other measures
Swann teacher ratings
Psychometric tests
Results
A significant correlation was found across all measures
p<0.0025
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
34. Passive Listening.
Sounds are all the same. We only care about timing.
deviant
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
35. Example A
Short Condition
Long Condition
Voltage uV
standard
deviant
Temporal Dynamics of Learning Time OECD 2012
36. Example A
Short Condition
Long Condition
Voltage uV
Sensitivity to Time
standard
deviant
Temporal Dynamics of Learning Time OECD 2012
37. Synchronization
Subject drums to a steady beat, even when sounds are omitted.
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
38. Drumming Data
Accuracy
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
39. sound omitted
Time (seconds)
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
40. Conclusions:
• There exists a correlation between the ability to
synchronize and classic measures of attention
• We have developed measures of individual
differences in temporal processing at the behavioral
and neural level
• These differences correlate with other cognitive
characteristics across individuals
• A tool to measure the effects of musical training
on measures of attention and classroom performance
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
41. Neuroimaging techniques provide a window into
The structural development necessary for timing
Courtesy of Terry Jernigan
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
42. How does white matter maturation relate to readiness for
academic skills? Can development be facilitated?
Thus far, longitudinal DTI findings support continued microstructural change in
white matter during late adolescence, and suggest ongoing refinement of
projection and association fibers into early adulthood. Structural asymmetries are
correlated with measures several measures of academic performance.
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
43. Why does time matter?
• Time matters for processing
• Time matters for learning
• Time matters for action
• Thus, optimizing temporal processing is a key
feature of the ability to learn effectively
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
44. Timescales of investigation Ba
Da
Whisking
10s of msec Spikes
STDP
Phoneme processing
Neuromodulation
Motor action
100s of msec Perceptual decisions
Brain rhythms
Action selection
Seconds Prediction
Temporal Diff. learning
Reinforcement
Minutes LTP
Days Neurogenesis
Weeks Spacing effects
Years Expertise
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012
45. What are the implications for
education?
Timing is an essential property of the world and
the brain and it must be optimal for optimal
learning to occur.
Plasticity is an inherent feature of the brain that
can be optimized and remediated through
specific types of behavioral training.
Basic aspects of our culture including music,
exercise, and enrichment may facilitate learning
and cognition. We should be circumspect before
removing them from the curriculum.
Temporal Dynamics of Learning OECD 2012