VIP Hyderabad Call Girls Bahadurpally 7877925207 ₹5000 To 25K With AC Room 💚😋
Nikkipowerpoint For Epi
1. Geographical Variations among Age-Adjusted
Low-Risk Primary
Cesarean Section (CS) Rates in California
Nikki Stoddart
Masters Candidate
Division of Epidemiology
Department of Health Research and Policy
Stanford University, School of Medicine
: Transforming Maternity Care
2. A Brief History of Cesarean Birth
The Birth of Asclepius
1549 Alessandro Beneditti
“De Re Medica”
: Transforming Maternity Care
3. Origins of Cesarean Birth
Historical record indicates infants born via
Cesarean
GreekMythology: Apollo removed Asclepius
from Coronis’ abdomen
Procedure performed on living women in
Ancient China
: Transforming Maternity Care
5. Why is it Called “Caesarean”?
Named for the birth of Julius Caesar?
Unlikely because in ancient Rome the
procedure was done only when the mother
was dead or dying but Caesar’s mother,
Aurelia, lived to hear of his Conquest of
Britain.
: Transforming Maternity Care
6. Oh, I see….
Possibly from the Latin “caedare”,
meaning “to cut”
Roman Law stated that women dying in
childbirth must be cut open to remove the
infant.
Latin word “caesones” refers to children born
by postmortem incision.
: Transforming Maternity Care
7. Finally, we have a live one!
In 1500 Jacob Nufer, a Swiss pig gelder,
performed a Cesarean on his ailing wife.
She lived to be 77 years old, and birthed 5
more children vaginally, including a set of
twins.
: Transforming Maternity Care
8. But Still Gruesome….
Between 1787- 1876, not a single Parisian
woman survived the Cesarean operation.
: Transforming Maternity Care
9. Performing Abdominal Surgery in Street Clothes
Thomas Spencer Wells, Diseases of the Ovaries, 1872
: Transforming Maternity Care
10. From Fatal to….....Less Fatal
Maternal mortality rates dropped in the
mid nineteenth century
1846 William Morton- Diethyl Ether
Women less likely to die from shock
1860’s Josef Lister- Carbolic Acid
Antiseptics and the germ theory
: Transforming Maternity Care
11. From Less Fatal…… To Safe
C/S rates increase because:
Post WWII, many new hospitals built
Surgical technique improved
Spinal Anesthesia developed
Penicillin purified 1940
Roman Catholic religious concerns
: Transforming Maternity Care
12. From Safe……to Every Day
Continued rate increase far outpaces rise in birth rate
Convenience
Physicians can schedule around vacations, dinnertime
Women can schedule time off from work
Cutting loses (Better a section a 6pm than a delivery at 3 am)
Culture
“Too Posh to Push” – Victoria Beckam
Vaginal Preservation Society
C.Y.A.
Malpractice suits
twins , breech, or VBACs are too risky
: Transforming Maternity Care
13. Technology in the Labor Suite Strongly Correlates with CS rates
Labor induction
r= 0.57 (P<.0001)
Fetal monitoring
Early Labor Admission
“Failure to progress” leads to CS
r= .62 (P <.0001)
: Transforming Maternity Care
14. Financial
Ob/gyn’s must do more deliveries to pay MI
C/S birth reimbursement is higher than
vaginal
: Transforming Maternity Care
15. So, where does that leave us
Today?
WHO and USDHHS recommend no more
than 15% of all births be C/S
Beyond 15%, risks begin to eclipse benefits
Yet 1/3 women in CA deliver via C/S
: Transforming Maternity Care
16. For every 5% decrease in the national
primary CS rate there will be:
Between 14-32 fewer maternal deaths
33,000 fewer NICU admissions
An savings of $750 million -$1.7 billion in
healthcare costs.
Plante 2006
: Transforming Maternity Care
17. Risks of CS to Mother
Blood Loss/Transfusion ≥ 1000 ml
Postoperative Infections
Subsequent Infertility
Subsequent increased risk: placenta previa, placenta accreta, placental
abruption and hemorrhage
Injury to bowel, bladder, pelvic vasculature
Rehospitalization
Maternal Mortality
RR: 1.6- 2.8
: Transforming Maternity Care
18. Risks of CS to Fetus
Higher rates of respiratory distress
5% C/S
0.5% vaginal
Possible iatrogenic prematurity
Double risk of NICU admission
Double risk of unexplained stillbirth in
subsequent pregnancy
: Transforming Maternity Care
20. Objectives
Identify regional variations of Age Adjusted Low-
Risk C/S rates in California
Simplify regions: Northern, Southern CA and LA
County
Identify excess rates of C/S deliveries
(Exclude Hospitals with less than 100 births per year)
Inform hospital leaders; lead quality change
: Transforming Maternity Care
21. Low-Risk Primary Cesarean Section
Defined:
Number of Cesarean Deliveries per 100 deliveries
among women who have not previously had a Cesarean
section (excludes abnormal presentation, preterm, fetal
death, multiple gestation, and breech procedures)
Primary C/S rates are age-adjusted.
OSHPD Data 2006
: Transforming Maternity Care
22. Age-Adjusted Low-Risk Primary C/S
Rates distributed to quintiles and
applied to regions:
0-20%; (Quintile 1: 5-13)
20-40%; (Quintile 2: 14-15)
40-60%; (Quintile 3: 16.1-16.9)
60-80%; (Quintile 4: 17-19)
80-100%;(Quintile 5: 19+)
Quintile ranges are per 100 births
: Transforming Maternity Care
23. Top and Bottom two Quintiles (40%) of Age-adjusted
Low-Risk Primary C/S Rates: Northern CA
Hospitals with rates > 17 Hospitals with rates < 16
n = 32/124 (25%) n=74/124 (60%)
: Transforming Maternity Care
24. Top and Bottom two Quintiles (40%) of Age-Adjusted
Low-Risk Primary C/S Rates: LA County CA
Hospitals with rates >17 Hospitals with rates < 16
n=44/60 (73%) n=12/60 (20%)
: Transforming Maternity Care
25. Top and Bottom two Quintiles(40%) of Age-Adjusted
Low Risk Primary C/S Rates: Southern CA
Hospitals with rates >17 Hospitals with rates < 16
n=34/80 (43%) n=40/80 (50%)
Hoag memorial
Scripps La Jolla
: Transforming Maternity Care
27. What are the total regional excess
cases above California’s mean primary
C/S rate (16 per 100 live births)?
: Transforming Maternity Care
28. Excess Cases of Low-risk
Primary Cesarean Births (age-adjusted)
above the State mean of 16 per 100 births.
By Hospital
San Francisco Bay Area 2006
Total Excess C/S Cases= 349 (3%)
Total low-risk non prior C/S= 11,043 (11%)
Total Live Births= 97,000
Good Samaritan
San Jose
Hospitals with more than 200 Excess Cases are labeled
: Transforming Maternity Care
29. Excess Cases of Low-risk
Primary Cesarean Births (age-adjusted)
above the State mean of 16 per 100 births.
By Hospital, LA County 2006
Total Excess C/S Cases= 4368 (20%)
Total low-risk non-prior C/S= 22,327 (20%)
Total Live Births= 114,846
Valley Pres
Cedars Sinai Hollywood Pres
Garfield Citrus Memorial
Huntington Park
: Transforming Maternity Care
30. Excess Cases of Low-risk
Primary Cesarean Births (age-adjusted)
above the State mean of 16 per 100
births.
By Hospital, Northern CA 2006
Total Excess C/S Cases= 1312 (5%)
Total Non-Prior C/S= 23,745 (11%)
Total Live Births= 212,919
Good Samaritan San Jose
: Transforming Maternity Care
Hospitals with more than 200 Excess Cases are labeled
31. Birth Costs (In thousands)
20000
18000
16000
14000
12000
10000 Vaginal Birth
8000 Cesarean Birth
6000
4000
2000
0
Physician Cost Hospital Cost Total Cost
: Transforming Maternity Care
32. Financial Implications of California’s
Excess Cases (Complications excluded)
Total excess cases above state mean:
17,677
Excess Healthcare Costs per Annum:
$ 93,422,945.00
Total excess cases above 15 (WHO Recommendation):
40,654
Excess Healthcare Costs per Annum:
$214,856,390.00
: Transforming Maternity Care
33. Conclusion:
Next Steps?
Questions/Comments?
What benchmark should we use?
Is Geomapping a useful tool for sharing data?
: Transforming Maternity Care