This document discusses a case study of sustainable collaborative transport optimization between retailers and suppliers in France. It describes how synchronizing deliveries and bookings between multiple partners through collaborative multi-partner logistics initiatives (CMIs) can reduce costs, inventory levels, and environmental impacts while improving delivery frequencies. Specific examples show how mutualization through CMIs increased truck fill rates from 32% to 88% and reduced inventory levels, costs, and the number of deliveries for participating partners.
2. Agenda
Introduction Olivier LABASSE, ECR France
Darran WATKINS, ECR UK
Cases from Peter LATHAM, Coca-Cola Enterprises Ltd
ECR UK Gavin CHAPPELL, Alliance Boots
Olivier LABASSE, ECR France
Cases from Thomas DUBRULLE, Carrefour
ECR Xavier PERRAUDIN, Benedicta
France
Patrice MINZOLINI, Cadbury
Rémi SOURIN, Cora
Discussion Questions to panel of speakers
Close
2
3. Transport background
Pollution
Pollution Network
Network Gasoline costs
Gasoline costs
geography
geography
Multimodal
Multimodal Legislation
Legislation Road saturation
Road saturation
implementation?
implementation?
Railway’s Capacity
Capacity
failure shortages
shortages Road security
Road security
policy
policy
Fiscal and social
Fiscal and social
legislation
legislation Inventory level
Inventory level Greenhouse
Greenhouse
distortions
distortions and quality
and quality gas
gas
European
European
Out of stock transportation Just in time
Just in time
Out of stock transportation
white book
white book
Environmental Transportation
Transportation
Transportation
Transportation Environmental
costs costs increase
costs increase
demand
demand costs 3
increase Internalisation
Internalisation
increase
4. Introduction
• Pressures on fuel, labour costs, road
congestion and greenhouse gas reduction
have moved to the top of the agenda of our
industry
• Collaborative transport optimisation has
economic and environmental benefits while
providing better service to consumer
• The session will show how companies reach
the same objectives in different countries
using different tools
4
5. Sustainable development: one global
approach, one European policy, national
strategies, local implementations
Economic growth
Sustainable
development
Social progress Environment
conservation
Deep-seated obligation for our companies
5
6. A shared approach
Face-to-Face &
Economic
On-Line Collaborative Benefits
Tools
Improved
Vehicle Environmental
Fill Benefits
Multi-Partner
Distribution Social
Benefits
6
7. UK Cases
• ECR UK Collaborative Green
Distribution
• Darran WATKINS, IGD/ECR UK
• Sharing Transport to Reduce Costs,
Congestion and Emissions
• Peter LATHAM, Coca-Cola Enterprises Ltd
• A Collaborative Distribution Solution in
Scotland
• Gavin CHAPPELL, Alliance Boots
9. ECR UK Structure & Activities
ECR UK
Board
Diane Carter Chris Tyas
Central Retail Operations Director Supply Chain Director
Sainsbury's Nestlé
Collaborative
Retail
Availability Green
Packaging
Workgroup Distribution
Workgroup
Workgroup
Learning & Change
Business Case Functional Date Coding
People Insights –
Multi-partner KPI’s Remote Subgroup Guidelines Subgroup
Engagement squeezing out Convenience
Trunking & Enablers Places Subgroup
– last 50 metres the last drop? Store Subgroup
Subgroup Subgroups Subgroup Environment Shelf Sizes
Subgroup Subgroup
Subgroup MU Subgroup Subgroup
• Activities have doubled between 2005 and 2007
• Over 150 people from the industry directly contribute to ECR activities
10. Food Industry Sustainability Strategy (FISS)
Clear targets were set for the industry including:
• Reduction of carbon emissions by 20% by 2010
• Reduction of water usage by 10-15% by 2010
• A significant reduction in the environmental and social
costs of domestic food transportation by 2012
• Reduction in food waste of 15-20% by 2010 by the
food manufacturing sector
11. Transport Champions Group
Action Main
impact
Greater capacity vehicles Fewer
Out of hours deliveries Friendlier
Engine specifications Friendlier The Transport “Big Six”
Vehicle telematics/CVRS Fewer
Transport collaboration Fewer
Logistics systems redesign Fewer
Total Both
12. Sharing Transport
to Reduce Costs,
Congestion and
Emissions
Peter Latham
VP Supply Chain
Development Europe
13. Why Collaborative Green Transport ?
In the UK, the food chain accounts for:
• At least 22% of the UK total of greenhouse
gas emissions
• 25% of all HGV vehicle kilometres in the UK
Challenged by the Government to:
• Reduce carbon emissions by 20% by 2010 against
a 1990 baseline
• Significantly reduce the environmental and social
costs of domestic food transportation by 2012
Source: Transport 2000 Trust, DEFRA
17. What Are We Working On ?
Collaborative Trunking
18. Collaborative Distribution Interactive Sessions
Name(s)
Record Sheet Job Title(s)
ECR Collaborative Distribution Workgroup
Company
Trunking Project – Case Study Record
10:10-12:00 Presentations 12:00-12:40 Speed-Dating 12:40-12:45 ‘Real’ Dates
and your first impressions to check your assumptions requested / organised
Company Yes / No / ? Flirt / Divert Why Wish list Time & Place Purpose of document
Booker The purpose of the document is to record the progress of partners in identifying
opportunities to remove empty trunking miles. By logging the issues encountered and
solutions found through all the stages of the process, a case study record can be
Boots The Chemist
developed for dissemination across the wider ECR community
CCE
At the collaborative trunking ‘speed dating’ event there are many potential pairs of
partners with opportunities to explore. This document is intended to log the progress
of these opportunities in a common format which in total will form a substantial case
Dairy Crest study.
The document is intended to follow the likely process, please amend the document as
Grampian Country
Transport
appropriate to match what actually happens.
Musgrave Budgens
Londis
Nestle
RHM Group Logistics
Tesco
Unilever ICF
Partners
Completed by
Date
19. Collaborative Trunking - Rollout
http://www.igd.com/collaborativedistribution
Ambient and chilled collaborative distribution sessions
held in Q4 2006 and Q1 2007
20. Opportunities to Save
687 loads/week
= 5,100,000
miles pa
The opportunities are clear:
it’s up to individuals to implement!
23. What is the Issue ?
Dedicated 3rd Party Accounts Typical Groupage Services
with specific: - General:
• Fleet configuration • Shared user
• Delivery processes • Limited value added
• Paperwork services
• Security / controls • Single transit media
• Transit Media
AND
OR (pallets or cages)
• Returns Processes • Common commercial
• Commercial Model model
• Delivery slots • ECONOMIES OF SCALE
/ store arrangements
24. Far Flung Places
High St Retailers Have:
• Distribution Centres in
central belt (Edinburgh /
Glasgow)
• Dedicated fleets of small
vehicles
• Long delivery runs (some 2
man) to outlying stores
• Grocers have Full Truck
Load deliveries to most
stores
Suppliers Have:
• Few manufacturing facilities
north of central belt to utilise
returning legs
> 80% Population live in the Central Belt
27. Far Flung Places – Potential Savings
• 6 % saving in shifts
• 16% saving in trips
• 39% saving in miles Definite Winner !
• 11,700 miles / day
• 3,600,000 miles / year
28. What Do We Want ?
• 3rd party to provide clear accountability for:
• Store service
• Security
• Insurance
• Billing
• KPI reporting
• Return load management
• To Hub
• To point of origin
• Scheduling
• Issue resolution
29. Outcomes – 3 Pilots
• Pilot 1 – Inverness
– Potential to share an existing facility and
use an existing shared user network
• Pilot 2 – Aberdeen
– Potential to use an existing shared user
network
• Pilot 3 – Highlands & Islands
– Shared transport opportunity
30. Pilots 1 & 2 (Boots The Chemist Only)
• Financial savings and reduced mileage
• Store delivery times maintained
• Stores to get increase in weekly delivery
frequency: 6 times vs. 3 today
• Better availability for our consumers
• Physical operation to start end of May ‘07
31. Conclusion
• The “Greenness” of our industry is not going to
go away
• If we don’t do something about it, the
Government will
• There are simple things we can do to make a
difference now
• We need the 3PL companies and other service
providers to come with us
• Collaborative Green Transport offers us a way of
saving money and the planet!
32. French cases
The ECR France 2007 “green comparator”
Olivier LABASSE
2 success stories of sustainable collaborative
transport optimisation which reduce
environmental impacts and costs and
improve delivery frequencies
– Multiplayer CMI between 3 SME and one large
– Multiplayer CMI between 3 SME and one large
retailer, Xavier PERRAUDIN, Benedicta & Thomas
retailer, Xavier PERRAUDIN, Benedicta & Thomas
DUBRULLE, Carrefour
DUBRULLE, Carrefour
– Multiplayer CMI between 2 large manufacturers and
– Multiplayer CMI between 2 large manufacturers and
2 RDC of one retailer, Patrice MINZOLINI, Cadbury
2 RDC of one retailer, Patrice MINZOLINI, Cadbury
& Rémi SOURIN, Cora
& Rémi SOURIN, Cora
The ECR “Transport web dating”
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
33. Some French trends in logistics
Retailers expectations
– To reduce inventories (- 10 days in 3 years)
– To reduce inventories (- 10 days in 3 years)
– To maintain an outstanding service level from their
– To maintain an outstanding service level from their
suppliers (large companies or SMEs)
suppliers (large companies or SMEs)
Manufacturers expectations
– To control logistics costs
– To control logistics costs
– To improve on shelf availability
– To improve on shelf availability
Transport evolution
– Increasing costs trend (+8,5% between 2004 and 2006)
– Increasing costs trend (+8,5% between 2004 and 2006)
– Decreasing offer (regional difficulties to deliver South of
– Decreasing offer (regional difficulties to deliver South of
France, Brittany … especially during peak seasons)
France, Brittany … especially during peak seasons)
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
34. What is at stake?
Economic stakes of mutualisation
– Transport costs control
– Transport costs control
– Inventory costs reduction
– Inventory costs reduction
– Increase of service level by increasing delivery
– Increase of service level by increasing delivery
frequencies
frequencies
Environmental stakes of better trucks
fulfilment
–
– CO2 reduction
CO2 reduction
–
– Gasoline consumption reduction
Gasoline consumption reduction
–
– Road congestion reduction
Road congestion reduction
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
35. Retailer distribution centre
supplying grocery
Pallets / deliveries
RDC Supply in pallets per day
40
35 15% of deliveries > to 33 pallets
30
50% of deliveries < à 5 pallets
25
Nb Pallets
Average 17,71 pal/supply
20
15
10
5
0
88%
93%
98%
36%
41%
82%
31%
46%
52%
57%
62%
67%
77%
10%
16%
21%
26%
72%
0%
5%
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
36. How to optimize the truck fulfilment?
Supplier A Supplier B
Multipick
Multiplayer CMI
A+B
Synchronization
of bookings
Multidrop
Points of sale
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
37. How to solve the contradiction?
Increase of Control of
service level logistic costs
Decrease of Reduction of
inventory cost environmental
impacts
Improvement
of freshness Reduction of
and quality of road congestion
products
More frequent
deliveries
≠
Mutualisation
Mutualisation
More full trucks
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
38. Optimisation of vehicles filling with
bookings synchronisation
If manufacturer alone
Nb of floor
Nb of floor Nb of
pallets / Vehicule fill
pallets deliveries
delivery
Manufacturer 1 1 347 354 4 12%
Manufacturer 2 1 784 268 7 20%
Manufacturer 3 177 89 2 6%
Manufacturer 4 3 311 377 9 27%
Manufacturer 5 15 002 949 16 48%
Total 21 621 2 037 11 32%
Current organisation (with logistics provider optimisation)
Total 21 621 1 535 14 43%
Organisation in CMI with bookings synchronisation
Total 21 621 743 29 88%
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response Source: Hays logistique ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
39. Economic stakes of the multiplayer CMI for
grocery by suppliers’ types
In CMI
Initial situation Without
With mutualisation
mutualisation
Inventory in
retailer’s 23 days < 16 days < 13 days
warehouse
6,7 6,6 6,6
A
6 deliveries a week 6 deliveries a week 6 deliveries a week
6,7 8 6,7
B
Cost in 1,4 deliveries a week 5 deliveries a week 5 deliveries a week
% of the 6,5 8,8 6,7
manu- C
facturer 0,9 delivery a week 4 deliveries a week 4 deliveries a week
selling price
7,5 9,8 7,5
D
0,4 delivery a week 3 deliveries a week 3 deliveries a week
Average 6,8 8 6,8
Economies realised thanks to the mutualisation of CMI:
almost 1,2% of the manufacturers’ turnover in average
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
40. Greenhouse gas emission distribution
in France
Mt CO2 2002
200 100%
180 90%
28%
Transports
160 80%
140 Residential 70%
Tertiary
120 60% 24%
Manufacturing
100 industry 50%
Energy 40%
80 transformation 22%
30%
60 Agriculture
Forestry 20% 13%
40
Others
10%
20 12%
0% 1%
0
1970 1980 1990 2000
CO2 worrying growth for transport sector
ECR Europe
Source: Response
Efficient Consumer CITEPA / coralie / format SECTEN, mise à jour 27/02/03
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
41. The French green comparator
Simulation tool developed in collaboration with
ADEME to assess the potential savings in
– gasoline
– gasoline
– CO2
– CO2
– vehicles.kilometres
– vehicles.kilometres
of the new transport solutions by comparison
with the initial situation
Objectives
– Road congestion diminution
– Road congestion diminution
– Greenhouse gas emission reduction
– Greenhouse gas emission reduction
– Fossil energy saving
– Fossil energy saving
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
42. The collective green counter
Monitoring reduction of
0
0
Tons of CO2
Tons of CO2 Litres of
Litres of Vehicle.kms
Vehicle.kms
gasoline
gasoline
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
44. Multi-players CMI
between
3 SME food companies,
a third party logistics operator,
6 hauliers
and a major retailer
Thomas DUBRULLE Xavier PERRAUDIN
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
45. 218 hypermarkets
delivered by 10 RDC
FRANCE
1025 supermarkets &
1649 convenience stores
delivered by 16 RDC
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
46. an independent SME
2006 115 M€ Turnover / 235 people
N°1 in Salad
Dressings
MS 36,7%*
N°2 in Mayonnaise / MS 22,0%*
N°1 in Variety Sauces
MS 39,4%*
N°2 in the Cold Sauces Market in France Market Share in
Value 26,4 %*
(*Source: AC Nielsen; cumulative value at the end of March 2007)
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
47. another independent SME
33 M€ Turnover / 65 people (in 2004)
(in 2004)
N°3 in Chocolate Powder market
Market Share ~13,3%
Brands BANANIA, BENCO
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
48. Pastacorp,
again another independent SME
86 M€ Turnover / 250 people (in 2005)
(in 2005)
N°3 in the Pasta Market in France
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
49. A collaborative answer
A mutualised multi-players approach
How to organise
COMBINED deliveries
from ONE single physical depot
to ONE single RDC
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
50. A practical and viable approach
At technical and operational levels
low investment / easy to set-up
simple to manage
But also from an economic point of view
no logistics’ cost increase at a minimum
Without forgetting environmental
effects
less CO2 consumption
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
51. A step by step approach
First tested with 2 SME
2 SME
October 2004
first set-ups
One 3rd party logistic operator
Q1&2 2005
First combined
Six regional hauliers deliveries
October 2005
One major retailer
Combined deliveries
100% RDC
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
52. A step by step approach
then extended to a 3rd SME
3 SME
October 2005
first set-ups
One 3rd Party Logistic Operator
Six Regional Hauliers February 2007
Combined deliveries
100% Delivery Points
One major Retailer
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
53. Flow chart physical mutualisation
Banania factory
Lustucru factory
Bénédicta factory
The 3 companies Bénédicta Banania Lustucru
share the same externalised Storage Storage Storage
facilities for storage and picking
A chosen haulier (partner)
takes goods in charge
from a unique binary
(synchronised picking and loading)
Only one single point of delivery
same booking
(location/day/hour)
Retailer DC
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
54. A step by step approach:
before mutualisation
factory
Benedicta central
warehouse
Le Bourget
Average deliveries
B
10 pallets once a week
Pont de
Veyle
Average deliveries
Bassens 11,5 pallets 1,5 times a week
Average deliveries
10 pallets 1,1 times a week
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
55. A step by step approach:
before mutualisation
factory Banania central
warehouse
Le Bourget
Average deliveries
B
4 Pallets 0,7 times a week
Pont de
Veyle
Average deliveries
Bassens 6 pallets once a week
Average deliveries
4 Pallets 1,2 times a week
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
56. A step by step approach:
before mutualisation
factory
Le Bourget
Average deliveries
B
19 pallets 0,9 times a week
Pont de
Veyle
Average deliveries
Bassens 25 pallets 1,1 times a week
Average deliveries
23,5 pallets 0,9 times a week
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
57. The approach with mutualisation
factory factory
factory
Le Bourget
Average deliveries
B
25 pallets 1,2 times a week
Pont de
Veyle
Average deliveries
Bassens 30 pallets 1,7 times a week
Average deliveries
29 pallets 1,3 times a week
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
58. Economic results
Average delivery frequency increased by +34%
Average load per delivery increased by +115%
Average stock coverage in RDC decreased by
-16% (-3 days with mutualisation)
Service level maintained to 99,6%
Overall number of Booking a year -55%
Logistic costs stabilised due to reduction on
loading and unloading costs in warehouses
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
59. Theoretical environmental results
Using ADEME / ECR green comparator
Litre of gasoline kg CO2 Vehicles.km
Initial situation 89 626 238 563 261 202
Multiplayer solution 44 123 117 445 114 173
Savings 45 503 121 118 147 029
% of savings 51% 51% 56%
Unbelievable !
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
60. Re-stated environmental results
Using ADEME / ECR green comparator
Litre of gasoline kg CO2 Vehicles.km
Initial situation 56 333 149 945 153 626
Multiplayer solution 44 123 117 445 114 173
Savings 12 210 32 500 39 452
% of savings 22% 22% 26%
Taking into account optimisation previously
performed by hauliers (average truck fulfilment ~66%)
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
61. As a conclusion
This collaborative approach has already been extended
This collaborative approach has already been extended
by the 3 SMEs to
by the 3 SMEs to
– 100% Carrefour RDC (26)
– 100% Carrefour RDC (26)
– One other retailer (Supermarchés Match)
– One other retailer (Supermarchés Match)
And we are looking for other partners …
And we are looking for other partners …
Carrefour has implemented collaborative approaches
Carrefour has implemented collaborative approaches
with
with
– 12 other manufacturers using the same method
– 12 other manufacturers using the same method
(large and small companies)
(large and small companies)
– with 60 private labels suppliers gathered on a
– with 60 private labels suppliers gathered on a
single consolidation centre
single consolidation centre
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
62. Multiplayer CMI between 2 large
manufacturers and 2 RDC of one
retailer
Rémi SOURIN Patrice MINZOLINI
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
63. Cora in France
59 Hypermarkets
14 Retailer distribution centers
22 000 employees
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
64. Increase of
Increase on shelf availability Control of
service level level to DC’s
and service logistic costs
Decrease of Reduction of
inventory cost Reduce our
environmental
environmental impact
impacts
Inventory reduction at RDC
Improvement
of freshness
and mix product improvement Reduction of
and quality of road congestion
products
More frequent
deliveries
≠
Mutualisation
Mutualisation More full trucks
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
65. Multiplayer CMI implementation between
CORA – CADBURY & SARA LEE
Initial situation
Deliveries in full trucks towards 2
Cora’s warehouses (Ludres and
Roye)
– Sara Lee
• 57 trucks towards Ludres a year
• 52 trucks towards Roye a year
– Cadbury
• 39 trucks towards Ludres a year
• 59 trucks towards Roye a year
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
66. Initial situation
Roye
Artenay Ludres
St Cyr en Val
Roye
Artenay
Ludres
St Cyr en Val
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
67. Mutualisation situation
Roye
Artenay
Ludres
St Cyr en Val
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
68. Economic KPIs
Cora Roye
Before After
Inventory 19 16
Frequencies 1,1 1,8
Service level 98,7 99,3
Cora Ludres
Before After
Inventory 20 17
Frequencies 1 1,65
Service level 98,9 99,4
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
69. Assessment tool: current situation
Flow n°1 Flow n°2 Flow n°3 Flow n°4
Expedition centre
Delivery centre
Distance per
delivery (km)
Average weight
per vehicle (tons)
Number of
vehicles per year
Number of delivery
per week
Weight per year
(tons)
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
70. Assessment tool: current situation
Flow n°1 Flow n°2 Flow n°3 Flow n°4
Expedition centre Artenay St Cyr Artenay St Cyr
Delivery centre Roye Roye Ludres Ludres
Distance per
190 200 370 380
delivery (km)
Average weight
18 18 18 18
per vehicle (tons)
Number of
52 59 57 39
vehicles per year
Number of delivery
1,0 1,1 1,1 0,7
per week
Weight per year
936 1 062 1 026 702
(tons)
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
71. Assessment tool:
mutualisation solution with Roye RDC
Loading 1-1 Loading 1-2
Loading point St Cyr Artenay
Final or midway destination
point
Artenay Roye
Final delivery point Roye
Distance per delivery (km) 10 190
Weight loaded at the loading
point per vehicle (tons)
9 9
Number of vehicle a year 95 95
Total weight transported per
delivery & per vehicle (tons)
9 18
Total weight transported per
journey & per year (tons)
855 1 710
Number of delivery a week 1,8 1,8
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
72. Assessment tool:
savings of the project
Litre of gasoline kg CO2 Vehicles.km
Initial situation 29 147 77 582 72 984
Multiplayer solution 27 014 71 905 65 494
Saving 2 133 5 677 7 490
% of savings 7% 7% 10%
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
73. How to identify more easily potential
manufacturer and retailer partners in order
to optimize together the road transport?
ECR
Transport
Web dating
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
74. ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
75. ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
76. ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
77. Significant use increase of the
ECR France transport web dating
200 189
180
160 155
140
23 March 2006
120 7 June 2006
100 96 11 September 2006
22 November 2006
80 77 79
70 11 January 2007
60 12 February 2007
39
40 35 37 38 26 March 2007
24
20 17
0 0 0
Company members Expedition & delivery
point
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
78. They use it
AUCHAN, CASINO, CARREFOUR SPC, CARREFOUR
HYPERMARCHES, CORA, METRO CASH AND
CARRY, SCACHAP/ LECLERC, SYSTEME U
20TH CENTURY FOX HOME VIDEO, BARILLA,
BEIERSDORF, BIC, BRASSERIES HEINEKEN,
CADBURY, COCA-COLA ENTREPRISE, COLGATE
PALMOLIVE, DOUWE EGBERTS, FERRERO, FLEURY
MICHON, FROMAGERIES BEL, GEMEY
MAYBELLINE GARNIER, GEORGIA PACIFIC,
HENKEL, KELLOGG'S PRODUITS ALIMENTAIRES,
KRAFT FOODS, L’OREAL, LASCAD, LU,
MASTERFOODS, MERALLIANCE, MHD, NESTLE,
SCA, SOLINEST
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
79. ECR France collective green counter
Litres of gasoline kg CO2 Vehicles.km
Savings 14 343 38 177 46 942
Players
Benedicta, Cadbury, Carrefour, Cora, Nutrimaine,
Pasta Corp, Sara Lee
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response
80. 1987-2007
Sustainable development definition
is 20 years old
Our responsibility is to implement it
We all report it through our annual reports
We have now the opportunity to make it
happen on collaborative way by transport
mutualisation
Let’s do it together from now on and show
that the Industry acts responsible …
ECR Europe
Efficient Consumer Response
ECR France
Efficient Consumer Response