The document discusses visualizing discussions on Wikipedia about deleting pages. It analyzes data from 108,634 deletion discussions (AfDs) to understand their dynamics. Key findings include: 1) AfDs ranged widely in duration from less than a day to over a year; 2) There was no correlation between duration and number of votes, resulting in a broad range of activity rates; 3) On average, the number of votes grew with duration until around 10 days, suggesting most discussions reach consensus within this time frame. The diversity of activity rates indicates the perceived importance of topics may influence discussion length and outcomes.
8. %!
discussion, but a strong cascading effect could also not be
104 2.0 excluded (see below). Conversely, in other cases consensus
Distinct votes
can be hard to reach and the discussion may drag for longer
$!
103 periods: some AfDs in the dataset have been closed after one
&'(')*+,-./" 1.5 year of discussion.
102
#! The absence of correlations between the duration of an AfD
1.0
0and the 10 number 20 votes 30
of accrued in that period results also
40
101 Duration (days)
1 month
in a broad distribution of activity rates, as shown in Figure 3
1 week
1 hour
1 year
1 day
"! Figure 4:(bottom), distinct options voteduse as a function to plot the density
Number of where again we for log binning
100 0 of the duration of AfDsrates. This diversity suggests that the perceived
50 of activity (in days.) 50
10 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109
Duration (sec) Delete Keep
40 importance of the topic of an AfD might play a role in deter-
40
!
sample size N = 108, 634 ning to plot the density dynamics of and of activity rates Expected
mining Expected duration collective attention it receives from
the of the
105 30 30
! "! #! $! %! of AfD discussions. Wikipedia policies suggest toas a possible consequence,
the community of editors, and, keep an
9
&'(')*+,-./! AfD discussion open at 10
20 its outcome. least for seven days, and this is
Further close to the 20 clearly needed to assess
clearly shown by the drop in density
research is of
value
104 10 this (s) = 1 (week) in type of (upper). However,
aspect of this Figure 3 deliberation tasks.
10
Figure 2: AfD trajectories and their outcomes. Each line T = 604, 800
represents the cumulative number of Keeps and Deletes at whenever consensus is reached beforehand, it is customary
0 0
103 any given step of the sequence. Color codes the outcome for admins to close the20
0 10 discussion and enforce the decision 10
30 40 50 0 20 30 40 50
of the AfD. Orange: AfD that resulted in the page being 5 Herding effects the hypothesis (p = 50) that
immediately. A t-test rejects
deleted; Purple: page kept, redirected or merged. The circle the number of options voted for in AfDs shorterwouldday Redirect
A totally unbiased discussion than 1 require voters’ prefer-
Merge
102 is equal4to that of longer AfDs. Moreover, Figure 4 shows
4
indicates one AfD sequence that ends off the plot. ences this be homogeneous and thatofeach voter is not influ-
to number grows with the duration the Expected
that, on average, Expected
vote approximately until T votes (days). This can3by the
3 enced by the
= 10 already cast be other voters. This is
< Xo >
101
105 symptomequivalent to say that votesthe AfD under
2 of the non-controversial nature of cast 2 by AfD participants form
discussion, but a strong cascading effect could the probability of choosing an
sequences of IID draws where also1not be
100 −8 104 excluded (see below). Conversely, in other cases consensus
1
10 10−7 10−6 10−5 10−4 10−3 can be hard to reach and the discussion may drag for longer
9
activity rate (votes/day) 0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_ 40
periods:0some AfDs in the dataset have40
10 20 30 50
0
been closed after one 10
0 20 30 50
103
policy
year of discussion. size N
10
Figure 3: (upper) AfD duration as a function of their length;
102
All open AfD discussions are listed in a single page. To our
(bottom) Distribution All activity rates for AfD lasting more absence of correlations between the informalofsurvey this and the personal
of Keep The knowledge and from our duration an AfD
than 24h; 101 Figure distribution ofAfD discussions. only Figure used by editors to keep
watchlist functionalitynumber results also
5: ofExpectedrates, asperiod in tools 3 as a function
and the number 1.0 votes accrued in are the
of that of votes Delete of A
1 month
track new activity
in a broad shown
1 week
1 hour
1 year
1 day
100 0
lengthwhere. 0.8Each sub-plotto displays the Keep
(bottom), N again we use log binning plot the density number of votes
Merge
101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 of activity rates. This diversity suggests that the perceived
of type ofothefor AfD of size a role(circles). Redirect solid lines
Red
10
Duration (sec) importance topic of an AfD might play N in deter-
5 the dynamics of collective attention it receives from
105
sample size N = 108, 634
thecommunity of editors, and, as aIID model with baseline probabilit
mining
linear 0.6 with an possible consequence,
fit
po (n)
Delete Merge and Redirect the
5
104 Random
Error barsFurtherof deliberation tasks.needed to assess of the mean.
its outcome.10 representis clearly
0.4
this aspect of this type
research the standard error
4
scade size
3 Data
103
2 Herding effects 0.2
9. 2.5
%!
2.0
Distinct votes
$!
1.5
&'(')*+,-./"
#!
1.0
0
"! Figure 4
of the du
! ning to p
! "! #! $! %! of AfD d
&'(')*+,-./! AfD dis
clearly s
13. Amy Loftus
Fairmont Preparatory Academy (2nd nomination)
Work spouse
Luis Barragan (executive) Jeopardy! in popular culture (2nd nomination)
Ehren Watada
Lonely Swedish (The Bum Bum Song)
List of U.S. and Canadian box office bombs
Suvalkai Region
Michelle Stith
KOS-MOS City of the Pyram
Yahoo! trolling phenomena List of video game animals
Scottish inventions
Centralskolan, Staffanstorp List of fictional television stations
Reuben Restaurant
Eastern Alliance Crocker Highlands Elementary School
Chuckie Mullins
Matthew (given name) Cashville Records
Sam's Dance Troupe
Roma people national football team (2nd nomination)
List of fictional turtles Community Middle School
Orgonophilia
Blanket clemency
Nocturne (movie)
List of largest empires (3rd nomination)
Philadelphia mayoral election, 2007
Polar Design Joshua P. Warren
Loserz (second nomination)
Mecha as Practical War Machines
TV Single Dads (2nd nomination)
JSP (Internet Celebrity)
Universal Day of the Jedi Samantha brett
NewsMax Media
Paranoia MUD Hayah
John Bullen Middle School
Denial of lesbianism
The Goldfish Network Fazeri Audra Williams (2nd nomination) Republican/Democrat In Name Only
Joi Ito
Edwin Curry
ms (third nomination)
B6186 road
List of Italian divisions in WWII
Saabs in popular culture
List of terms Democrats
Assembly associated
British-India American with the
Fat wank ofHolocaust Unionists color...
Korean Liberal
The betterthanbest entmap2 Every time you masturbate God kills a kitten
Adscam blog disclosure
Shit funnel
Three Ravens 3School District 2006-2007 school year calendar
Kathy Vavrick-O'Brien
Transformers
Central Unified
Indian Institute of Management Calcutta
Michael Q. Schmidt (3rd nomination)
The 9/11 REcommission Report
Localdataplace
Agnostic theism
Anthony Carboni
List of Catholic musicians