3. 3
…and the way we live them
The way we communicate… The way we shop…
The way we grow crops…The way we use healthcare… The way we do business…
The way we move…
5. 5
… “Standards” is a critical word in this revolution …
… creates barriers
A lack of standards…
6. 6
…today almost everybody understands why…
Limited to few de-facto standards,
each controlled by a single,
powerful proscriber
2005-2015
Smart City
Smart Car
2015 and beyond…
Smart Home
Smart Office
8. 8
The benefits of an Open Ecosystem
Service & Domain
Providers: innovation,
cost savings, data@work
Platform
Providers
and Solution
Integrators:
ability to “co-
opete” (cooperate
and compete)
Application
Providers: visibility,
connection to target
customers, acceleration
opportunities, facilities
for experimentation
Commercial
Partnerships
Connect to
Entrepreneurs
Avoid risk of
lock-in
City
Governments
Connected Car
Developers
City Service
Providers (data)
Everyone:
creation of jobs, larger
market opportunities,
global scalability
Telecom providers:
System integrators
Independent
developers
Innovative Apps
9. 9
…Creating a vibrant community of
active contributors who are committed to
a sustainable investment over time
24 partners from 9 different countries
Over 1.1 million hours of developing
activities in 5 years
122/76M€ of budget/funding (37/23 M€ in
the next 2 years)
Each FIWARE component is considered
strategic in the portfolio of each
contributing partner
Building a successful ecosystem requires…
10. 10
…Creating a meeting point where supply
and demand intersect and innovation takes
place
25+ relevant service providers involved in
developing use cases for the FIWARE
Accelerator program
1900 open datasets from cities already
published and growing fast!
17 nodes across Europe providing 3000+
cores, 16+ TB RAM, 750+ TB HD
1st node in LATAM deployed in Mexico.
New nodes being setup in Brazil and Chile
Building a successful ecosystem requires…
11. 11
…Creating incentives for entrepreneurs
and developers
80 M€ in grants to startups/SMEs in the
next 2 years (FIWARE Acceleration
Program)
20 M€ to support involvement of
16 accelerators across Europe
3100+ startups/SMEs applied to 1st
Open Call of the FIWARE Acceleration
program
1300 startups/SMEs to be funded (~400
as result of 1st Open Call)
Building a successful ecosystem requires…
12. 12
…Creating scale and the ability to go global
21 Innovation Hubs in Europe
First FIWARE Lab nodes in Mexico and
Brazil
funding assigned to FIWARE mundus
activities targeted to build links with
Mexico, Brazil, Chile, Japan,
Canada, Korea, BRIC countries …
Building a successful ecosystem requires…
13. 13
We walk the talk…
TELEFONICA, ORANGE, ENGINEERING and ATOS
join forces to push common standards for
Smart Cities based on the FIWARE platform
Open and Agile Cities Initiative:
Participating Cities
Mexico (in conversations)Brasil (in conversations)
Finland
Helsinki, Espoo, Vantaa,
Tampere, Oulu, Turku
Denmark
Copenhagen, Aarhus,
Aalborg
Spain
Valencia, Santander, Malaga,
Sevilla
Belgium
Brussels Capital
Region, Ghent,
Antwerp
Portugal
Porto, Fundao, Palmela,
Agueda
UK (in conversations)
Netherlands (in conversations)
CeBIT, Hannover, March 16th 2015MWC, Barcelona, March 3rd 2015
Italy
Milan, Palermo, Lecce
14. 14
…including with South Korea, a recognized leader in the Digital Economy
KT and Telefónica
announced a strategic
partnership to
develop IoT
ecosystems and
technologies at MWC
Source: Santiso, Javier, España 3.0
Korea is leading the digitalization worldwide
«e-Intensity» index vs. GDP per capita(1)
20 30 40 50
GDP (PPP) ($000, rounded PPP)
180
150
120
90
e-IntensityIndex,2013
200
60
Czek R
Swed
en
Netherlan
d
Sweden
Irelan
dAustri
aBelgiu
m
German
y
France
UK
Malt
a
Spai
nItaly
Greec
e
Chipr
e
Portug
al
Slovenia
Estoni
a
EslovaquiaHungar
y
Poland
Lituania
Letonia
Romani
a Bulgary
Norway
Denmark
Israel
Japan
Turkey
Finland
US
Kore
aWorld’s top
“Digital”
country
15. 15
…the reasons behind which are clear
Source: Santiso, Javier, España 3.0
Korea has downloaded the digital economy “killer apps”
GlobalizationInnovation Digitalization Education
4.4%
1.3%
Corea España
54%
34%
Corea España
60%
6%
Corea España
12
-1
Corea España
R&D (% GDP, 2012) Exports (% GDP, 2013) % Accesses > 15 Mbps
(1Q 2014)
2013 vs. 2003 Mathematics
ranking variation (PISA
report)
1º 1º 35º 5º 34º25º 5º 18º
Digitalization Ranking. This ranking is based in the average broadband Access speed, in 2T 2013, as reported by
Akamai
18. 18
122 = 85 + 37 M€
FIWARE budget (phases 1& 2 + phase 3)
99 = 76 + 23 M€
FIWARE funding (phases 1& 2 + phase 3)
80 + 20 M€
for startups/SMEs
18 = 17 + 1
FIWARE Lab nodes
FIWARE Public Private Partnership: main figures
24
partners
9
countries
16+
cities
6,5M€
marketing
450K€
Sponsorship
next 2 years
95/66M€
budget/funding
of Vertical
Use Cases
21
Innovation
hubs
1300
Startups/SMEs
19. 1
Koreahas downloadedthe digital economy “killerapps”
GlobalizationInnovation Digitalization Education
4.4
%
1.3
%
Corea España
54
%
34
%
Corea España
60
%
6%
Corea España
12
-1
Corea España
R&D (% GDP, 2012) Exports (% GDP, 2013) % Accesses > 15 Mbps
(1Q 2014)
2013 vs. 2003 Mathematics
ranking variation (PISA
report)
1º 1º 35º 5º 34º25º 5º 18º
Digitalization Ranking. This ranking is based in the average broadband Access speed, in 2T 2013, as reported by Akamai
Fuente: Basado en la OCDE, OMC, Banco Mundial, Akamai y Pisa Report, 2015.
20. (1) El Índice e-Intensity de Boston Consulting Group mide la madurez relativa de las economías de Internet en base a tres factores: Habilitación, Compromiso y Gasto: Habilitación representa el
50% del peso total e incluye infraestructuras fijas y móviles; Compromiso, 25%, mide en qué grado las empresas, gobiernos y consumidores adoptan Internet; Gasto, 25%, mide la proporción del
gasto realizado en minoristas online (i-retailers) y publicidad online.
Fuente: Basado en Boston Consulting Group “e-Intensity Index, 2013”, 2015. 2
Korea is leading the digitalization worldwide
«e-Intensity» index vs. GDP per capita(1)
20 30 40 50
GDP (PPP) ($000, ajustado PPP)
180
150
120
90
e-IntensityIndex,2013
200
60
Czek R
Sweden
Netherland
Sweden
Ireland
Austria
Belgium
Germany
France
UK
Malta
Spain
Italy
Greece
Chipre
Portugal
Slovenia
Estonia
Eslovaquia
Hungary
Poland
Lituania
Letonia
Romania
Bulgary
Norwey
Denmark
Israel
Japa
n
Turkey
Finland
US
Korea
World top “Digital”
country
21. 613
573
561
560
554
538
536
535
531
523
484
Shanghai-China
Singapur
Hong Kong-China
Taipei
Corea S.
Macao-China
Japón
Liechtenstein
Suiza
Países Bajos
España
España 3.0: Re-loadinglas killerappsde la competitividad: Educación
2
China e India dominan el pool de
estudiantes “tech” en Occidente
Top 10 –Países por capitalhumano(Indice de
DesarrolloCapital Humano*-BSA)
19%
15%
10%
4%
4%4%
2%
2%
40%
De dónde provienen los estudiantes
extranjeros en EE.UU?
China
India
Corea S.
Canadá
TaiwánJapón
Arabia
Saudí
México
Otros
Fuente: Basado en “Economist Intelligent Unit” y en el “Institute of International
Education – Modern Language Association”, y en “Benchmarking IT Industry
Competitiveness & Graduate Management Admission Council”, 2015.
74
60
60
59
58
56
55
54
53
53
47
EE.UU.
China
Australia
Corea S.
Reino Unido
N. Zelanda
Irlanda
Taiwan
Canadá
India
España
*Índice de Desarrollo Humano basado en: i) Matrículas en
Educación Superior; ii) Matrículas en Ciencias y en TI; iii)
Calidad de habilidades tecnológicas. Datos 2011.
18º
4º
34º
5º
Top 10 – Países por puntuación en
Matemáticas (Informe Pisa 2013)