SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 20
Baixar para ler offline
FACULTY SALARIES INCH UP
Increase Just Matches Inflation
Findings from the AAUP Salary Survey

S

Faculty Salaries

Faculty Profile

Salaries Over Time

Sponsored by:

CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 1

9/20/13 11:29 AM
THE SECRET TO

A STABLE
RETIREMENT?
A STABLE INVESTMENT PROVIDER.

Last year, TIAA-CREF paid out $4.3 billion in retirement
income.1 We help millions of people in nonprofit
businesses plan and manage retirement, more than
any other financial services provider.2 It’s how we
deliver Outcomes That Matter for your employees.

Nearly a century of lifetime income payments
to get employees through retirement.3
Get started at tiaa-cref.org/lifetime.

1
In 2012, TIAA-CREF plan participants received annualized payments of $4.3 billion through TIAA-CREF lifetime annuity contracts. 2 Source:
LIMRA, Not-for-Profit Market Survey, first-quarter 2013 results. Based on a survey of 29 companies. 3 Lifetime income is a guarantee subject to
TIAA’s claims-paying ability. Investment, insurance and annuity products are not FDIC insured, are not bank guaranteed, are not deposits, are
not insured by any federal government agency, are not a condition to any banking service or activity, and may lose value. TIAA-CREF Individual
& Institutional Services, LLC and Teachers Personal Investors Services, Inc., members FINRA, distribute securities products. ©2013 Teachers
Insurance and Annuity Association-College Retirement Equities Fund (TIAA-CREF), 730 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017. C11882

TIAA-CREF products may be subject to market and other risk factors. See the applicable product literature, or visit tiaa-cref.org for
details. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 2

9/20/13 11:29 AM
CONTENTS
3

FACULTY PAY RISES SLIGHTLY

4

AS PUBLIC-PRIVATE PAY GAP WIDENS,
STATE UNIVERSITIES TRY TO HANG ON
TO FACULTY

8

COLLEGES BEGIN TO REWARD
PROFESSORS FOR DOING WORK
THAT ACTUALLY MATTERS TO THEM

11

FOR FULL-TIME INSTRUCTORS, WORK
OFF THE TENURE TRACK BECOMES ITS
OWN CAREER

14

Average Salaries of Full-Time
Faculty Members, 2012-13

CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 3

9/20/13 11:29 AM
ulty Salaries

CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 4

Faculty Profile

9/20/13 11:29 AM
The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013

FACULTY PAY
RISES SLIGHTLY
Pay increase of 1.7%, matching inflation,
puts average salary at $84,000

The news about faculty salaries is “not all bad,” says
a report by the American Association of University

Professors on the economic status of the profession. But
it’s not all that great, either. The average faculty salary

for 2012-13 is just over $84,000, reflecting an increase
of 1.7 percent over last year. That matches the rate of
inflation, marking the first time in four years that

professors’ pay did not lose ground in that regard.

Full-time professors who have remained at the same
institutions received salary increases averaging

3.2 percent, marginally higher than in recent years.

And growing numbers of colleges are broadening their
reward systems for faculty, more often counting

digital work and public-service oriented research
in decisions about awarding raises, bonuses,
promotions, and tenure.

But the average pay increases for full-time faculty

this year are well below the average level of annual

increases over the past decade. And professors at
public colleges are seeing their salaries fall ever

further behind those of their peers at private colleges.
For full-timers who work off the tenure track—now

nearly two of every five full-time faculty members—data
in the report show that the likelihood of their jumping to
better-paying jobs on the tenure track is slim.

“Important long-term trends,” the report says, “are still
heading in the wrong direction for higher education.”

— SARA

HEBEL

3
CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 5

9/20/13 11:29 AM
The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013

AS PUBLIC-PRIVATE
GAP WIDENS, STATE
UNIVERSITIES TRY TO
HANG ON TO FACULTY
by

SYDNI DUNN

Eric J. Barron, president of Florida State University,
is fighting a faculty exodus.

Florida State isn’t the only public university hard put
to find money for faculty salaries. Nationally, the gap
between what public and private colleges pay their

The university has struggled to retain good professors

professors has only continued to grow, according to

In fact, the president warned state officials last

During this academic year, the average salary across

because it’s been unable to reward them with big
salary increases, or with any increases at all.

year, budget cuts have started to turn his university

into a “farm team” for institutions outside the state,
a place where young faculty start their careers,

gain experience, and soon take their training and
expertise elsewhere.

“We exceed our national ranking in every metric,”
Mr. Barron says. “Where do we not exceed our
rank? We don’t in terms of what we pay for

faculty salaries and what we can invest in the
academic program.”

an annual report released by the American Association
of University Professors.

all faculty ranks at private colleges was $99,771, an

increase of 2.4 percent from the previous academic year.
At public colleges, the average salary was $80,578, a
1.3 percent increase.

The public-sector disadvantage is greatest for full
professors. At public master’s-level colleges, they

earn 17 percent less than do their peers at private

institutions. Those at public doctoral universities earn
35 percent less than their peers at private doctoral
institutions, according to the report.

4
CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 6

9/20/13 11:29 AM
The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013

Daniel J. Hurley, director of state relations and policy

analysis at the American Association of State Colleges

and Universities, says some public universities haven’t
been able to give any salary increases for the past four

to five years because state budgets have remained tight.

“That conversation is certainly not happening at private
institutions,” he says. “Private institutions are able to
recruit and pay for the top talent.”

At Florida State, faculty salaries for the highest-ranked
professors this academic year fall significantly below

the average, according to the AAUP report. The average
pay for full professors at Florida State is $109,400,

which is 11 percent less than the average for those at all
public doctoral institutions.

“A legislature has to
	 know and understand
	 the stresses being
	applied.”
For associate professors, the average pay at Florida
State is $76,700, which is 9 percent less than the

average for all public doctoral institutions. Assistant
professors, however, earn 5 percent more at Florida

State than their peers at public doctoral institutions,
whose average salary is $77,100.

“The salary offers that professors received for jobs

elsewhere were as much as $20,000, or 28 percent,
higher than their salaries on the Tallahassee, Fla.,
campus”, Mr. Barron says.

“Our faculty love this university and love this region, but
it’s tough to turn down something that’s a significant
raise,” he says.

Popular destinations for departing faculty have included
public and private colleges in Georgia, Pennsylvania,
and Texas.

While public colleges in many states have seen their

appropriations drop in recent years, Florida’s cuts have

been among the deepest. State appropriations for higher
education in Florida decreased by 31.3 percent from the
2008 to the 2013 fiscal years.

Yuri Gershtein, a former assistant professor of physics at
Florida State, says Rutgers University recruited him for
its physics department in 2008.

Mr. Gershtein, now an associate professor, says the

salary offer, in terms of the dollar amount, was “a pretty
significant bump” from his pay in Florida.

“Florida State was always good at the initial offers, and
that was the strategy,” he says. “The initial offer is high,
but then the salary doesn’t grow.”

Todd Adams, an associate professor of physics at Florida

‘TOUGH TO TURN DOWN’

State, says the “upheaval” of faculty makes it difficult to

by both private and public institutions”, Mr. Barron says.

one of best places they can be,” says Mr. Adams, who is a

“Florida State’s faculty members have been lured away

Of the 58 professors in the College of Arts and Sciences
who were offered jobs at other universities last year,
Florida State was able to persuade only eight to stay.

recruit new professors.

“You want to convince them they would be coming to
member of the Faculty Senate. But “it’s hard to sing

praises and say, ‘It’s going to be great, and your salary
will keep going up,’ when it may not.”

5
CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 7

9/20/13 11:29 AM
The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013

Mr. Barron, Florida State’s president, has been looking

But Mr. Barron’s message to state lawmakers is that

So far this academic year, 36 professors from Florida

institutions is allowed to continue to grow.

for ways to improve retention and put more money into
the faculty.

State have moved elsewhere. But Mr. Barron says they

will all be replaced. He even expects that the university
will be able to add to its faculty.

The university has found ways to save money, such

as lowering campus energy consumption, and is putting
more money toward some faculty pay raises “It is not in

the position to do anything across the board,” he says, but
there is enough money to provide some performance-

based raises, including those accompanying promotions
and given out at post tenure reviews.

such increases are not enough, that Florida State and

public universities like it will be left behind if the gap

between their salaries and those of their peer private

“Nobody wants to wave a white flag that says, ‘People
are stealing my faculty,’ yet I think a legislature has to
know and understand the stresses being applied,”
Mr. Barron says.

“If you want to be nationally competitive, if you want
to have top ranks, if you want to keep the best and

brightest, then don’t spend all your money sitting there

getting a faculty member started and once they prove to
be excellent have them go somewhere else.”

6
CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 8

9/20/13 11:29 AM
The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013

How the gap has grown over the past 10 years

Difference in Faculty Pay Between Public and Private
$100,000
Colleges Continues to Widen
$90,000

How the gap has grown over the past 10 years
$80,000
$70,000
$100,000

Gap in
2013: 24%

$60,000
$90,000
$50,000
$80,000

Gap in
2004: 18%

$40,000
$70,000

Gap in
2013: 24%

$30,000
$60,000
$20,000
$50,000

Private
colleges

Average faculty salary at

Gap in
2004: 18%

$10,000
$40,000

Public
colleges

0
$30,000
$20,000

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

Private
colleges

Average faculty salary at

$10,000

S

0

Faculty Salaries

2004

2005

2006

Faculty Profile

2007

2010

2008

2009

2011

2012

2013

Public
colleges

2010

Salaries Over Time

2011

2012

2013

How faculty pay at public and private colleges differs in 2012-13

S

Faculty Salaries

Faculty Profile

Private colleges

Salaries Over Time

Public colleges

Average
salary

Average
Average
one-year
salary
increase
How faculty pay at public and private colleges differs in 2012-13

Average
one-year
increase

Full professor

$139,620 colleges 3.0%
Private

$110,143 colleges 1.6%
Public

Associate professor

Average
$88,301
salary

Average
$78,529
salary

Assistant professor
Full professor
Lecturer
Associate professor
All combined
Assistant professor

$74,664
$139,620
$56,530
$88,301
$99,771
$74,664

Average
2.0%
one-year
increase
2.3%
3.0%
3.3%
2.0%
2.4%
2.3%

$67,097
$110,143
$46,926
$78,529
$80,578
$67,097

Average
1.5%
one-year
increase
2.0%
1.6%
1.7%
1.5%
1.3%
2.0%

Lecturer

$56,530

3.3%

$46,926

1.7%

All combined

$99,771

2.4%

$80,578

1.3%

SOURCE: American Association of University Professors

7
CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 9

9/20/13 11:29 AM
The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013

COLLEGES BEGIN TO
REWARD PROFESSORS
FOR DOING WORK THAT
MATTERS TO THEM
by

AUDREY WILLIAMS JUNE

David W. Szymanski wanted to work at a college where

in local communities, and innovative teaching. The change

the policies they create, and produce scholarship about

professors to pursue work that matters to them without fear

he could do what he does best: teach students how

science can be used to solve real-world problems, help

policy makers understand the link between science and
teaching and learning.

But he worried that the kind of work he does—much
of it interdisciplinary and public-oriented—wouldn’t

amount to much in the faculty-reward systems in place
on many campuses.

What often counts most in decisions about promotions, pay,
and performance evaluations is having lots of highly cited

research published in well-known, peer-reviewed journals,
and being able to win large amounts of grant money.

But a growing number of institutions are adopting more
inclusive reward systems for faculty, with increased

recognition for non-traditional kinds of research, service

reflects shifts in scholarship and research in a world of rapidly
changing technology, in which new forms of digital work are
emerging. The new systems are also creating avenues for
that they will derail otherwise promising careers.

Mr. Szymanski, a geologist and forensic scientist, started
working at Bentley University in 2009 as an assistant

professor of natural and environmental sciences. Bentley,
in Waltham, Mass., is one institution that is broadening

the scope of faculty work that it recognizes and rewards,

not least in decisions about salary increases and bonuses.
He has received a merit-based raise to reward his
successes, particularly his creation of a popular

undergraduate course that gives students hands-on

experience in how science and scientific data relates to

federal environmental policies. Students in the course go

to Washington to share their research with policy makers.

8
CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 10

9/20/13 11:29 AM
The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013

“I came to Bentley because I knew that I could do

this kind of work here,” says Mr. Szymanski, who won the
university’s top teaching award for 2011 in recognition

of the course. He was also an author of a peer-reviewed
journal article, published last year, about how to use

public-sector research projects to engage undergraduates.

“Publishing in journals
	 isn’t going away, but ...
	 we also reward
	 people for the work
	 that matters to them.”

Professors like Mr. Szymanski are among the kinds of
people the business-oriented university is interested

in considering for new bonuses, says Daniel L. Everett,
dean of arts and sciences. Bentley will decide in mid-

April which several dozen professors will receive onetime awards of about $5,000. Department chairs will

recommend candidates, and the decisions will be made
by the provost. One goal is to include professors whose

work is beneficial to Bentley but may fall under the radar
of the traditional faculty-reward structure.

“People often think, ‘You’re only going to reward me if

I do research,’” Mr. Everett says. “Publishing in journals
isn’t going away, but we’re not overlooking everything

else. We want to make sure that we also reward people
for the work that matters to them.”

That kind of recognition can go a long way in an

environment where salary increases have barely kept

pace with inflation in recent years. A new report on the
economic state of higher education, released this week
by the American Association of University Professors,
found that, on average, pay for faculty members rose

only 1.7 percent this academic year. The increase

matches inflation, but only because inflation is so low.

UNDERVALUED SCHOLARSHIP

Other institutions, too, have taken steps to embrace

nontraditional forms of scholarship. Michigan State,

Portland State, and Syracuse Universities are among

those that have changed their tenure-and-promotion
policies to recognize public scholarship as much as
more-traditional activities like writing books and
publishing in scholarly journals.

James S. Fairweather, a professor of higher, adult, and

lifelong education at Michigan State who studies faculty

roles and rewards, says conversations about how to best

document and reward the full scope of faculty work have
gained traction. He expects that to trigger “some support
for broader concepts of faculty contributions.”

KerryAnn O’Meara, an associate professor of higher

education at the University of Maryland at College Park,
agrees. There are routine tasks, she says, that faculty do
that “don’t show up on their CV and don’t show up in
annual reports of their time.”

Among those, she says, are mentoring graduate

students, directing institutional programs, writing

letters of recommendation, and marketing programs
to attract new students.

Also often undervalued is scholarship in which

professors use their expertise to explore issues in

their communities. There are more people involved in

community engagement than ever before, Ms. O’Meara
says. Yet the path for career advancement for such
scholars is still largely unpredictable.

Mary C. Hutchinson became involved in communityengaged scholarship while teaching writing at

9
CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 11

9/20/13 11:29 AM
The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013

Pennsylvania State University at Lehigh Valley. She

pursued her interest in ways teachers could better
support English-as-a-second-language learners
enrolled in the public-school system.

“Because I wasn’t in a tenure-track position, I was free
to do what I wanted,” says Ms. Hutchinson, who once
worked as an administrator and then as a lecturer

in English for seven years. She earned a doctorate in

education and with the degree was hired as an assistant
professor of ESL education at Penn State. Then she

scholarship on her campus—and throughout higher

education, while the Faculty Senate at Syracuse voted to
make changes to the university’s tenure and

promotion policies so that assessing public scholarship
in its many forms would be possible.

Overhauling the faculty-reward system won’t work
without a broad shift in the attitudes of professors,
especially the ones who determine whether the

scholarship of their peers measures up. Simply adding
metrics or categories of work to evaluate as part of

began to face pressure from senior administrators and

faculty-reward systems won’t work, says Michigan State’s

“I wanted to just go ahead with what I was doing,” says

“Unless administrators are willing to have conversations

colleagues, on and off the campus, she says, to acquire
a solid publication record that reflected what she was
doing in the community.

Ms. Hutchinson, who also does research on service

learning. “It only took the second-year review to see
that wasn’t going to cut it.”

So she “did double the work,” she recalls, both to

continue the research that mattered most to her and to
make sure she was getting articles published to bolster
her case for tenure, which she earned last year.

What can help public scholarship become more

important to academics’ careers? A critical mass of

professors involved in such work, or of high-profile
scholars who have made a commitment to it,
Ms. O’Meara says.

“I’ve also seen that the larger the campus, the more

important it is that people are on board at every level,” she

says. “You need to have a provost or a president advocating

for it, but you also need the faculty on a campus saying, This
is something that we really want to do.”

At Syracuse University, for instance, the institution’s

chancellor, Nancy Cantor, is a vocal supporter of public

Mr. Fairweather, unless colleges make more of an effort
to try to encourage people to “think about what really
matters—and that’s a different kind of conversation.”
with people who are on promotion-and-tenure

committees, nothing changes,” he says. “What matters is
what those people value. At some point, institutions are
going to have to confront that.”

Mary T. Huber, a consulting scholar at the Carnegie

Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, says she’s
confident that new forms of scholarship will get the
standing they deserve.

“There is a growing cadre of people who have done

scholarship in these new areas, and they will be the
ones to educate others about it and serve as peer

reviewers,” Ms. Huber says. “If the work that’s being

done is actually meritorious, expands the imagination,

expands knowledge, and improves practice, I believe it’s
going to win out in the end.”

At Bentley, Mr. Szymanski is hopeful that his work will
mean success when he goes up for tenure.

“They’ve already said the kind of work I do is valued,” he
says, “so that’s why I keep doing it.”

10
CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 12

9/20/13 11:29 AM
The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013

FOR FULL-TIME
INSTRUCTORS, WORK
OFF THE TENURE
TRACK BECOMES
ITS OWN CAREER
by

ROBIN WILSON

When Denise K. Comer snagged a prestigious

postdoctoral position at Duke University shortly after

finishing her Ph.D. in English, she was sure the position
would set her up for a tenure-track job down the line.

Thirteen years later, Ms. Comer is still at Duke, working
full time but off the tenure track, as director of the
university’s first-year writing program.

“I thought I’d launch myself into a tenure-stream

position, but that changed,” she says. Her goals shifted
as she had three children, and as the job at Duke—

which she originally saw as a natural steppingstone to
the tenure track—provided unexpected opportunities
that she came to enjoy.

A new report on the economic status of the professoriate
shows that Ms. Comer’s story is typical among the

284,000 people who teach full-time off the tenure track.

While such instructors may have envisioned eventually
landing jobs within academe’s tenured ranks, many

have instead spent their careers working in full-time

contract positions with lower pay and less job security

than tenured professors enjoy. The possibility that these
full-timers will ever be considered for tenure-track jobs
is slim, the report shows.

The report, released April 8 by the American Association
of University Professors, includes some of the most

extensive data yet on the salaries and working conditions
of non-tenure-track instructors, who account for nearly
40 percent of the full-time academic work force. The

data come from a survey of 7,500 such instructors by the
Coalition on the Academic Workforce, a group of highereducation and scholarly-discipline associations.

John W. Curtis, director of research and public policy

at the AAUP and an author of the report, said the survey

11
CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 13

9/20/13 11:29 AM
The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013

“appears to be the largest to date focusing on contingent

“This job is not transparent from the very beginning,”

better working conditions than do part-time adjuncts.

steppingstone, when it’s not.”

academics.”

Full-time contingent faculty members certainly enjoy
Full-timers typically work on one-year to three-year

contracts, says the AAUP report, and most are paid an

annual salary, which averaged about $47,500 a year in
2010, the year the survey was conducted.

But, for many, a job they considered temporary has
become a career. Nearly 40 percent of the full-time

instructors surveyed by the coalition said they had been
teaching off the tenure track for at least a decade, and
most who hold such positions are pushing middle age:
80 percent are 36 or older. Their pay is much better

than that of part-time adjuncts, who the AAUP report
says earn an average of $2,700 per course, but they

still earn substantially less than tenure-rank faculty

members, who made an average of $84,332 in 2010.

NOT A STEPPINGSTONE

Ms. Comer isn’t certain anymore whether landing a
tenure-track post is her goal. She loves her job and

even turned down a tenure-track offer from another

university because the position wasn’t a match for the
one she has at Duke.

“I’d built such a network at Duke of people, resources,
and opportunities it would take two or more years
somewhere else to get that going again,” she says.

Even if Ms. Comer does decide she wants to pursue a

tenure-track job at Duke, though, the coalition’s survey
seems to show that achieving it wouldn’t be easy. Just
3 percent of those surveyed said they were given
priority consideration on their campuses when
tenure-track jobs came open.

says Maria C. Maisto, president of the New Faculty

Majority, a national group that represents contingent
faculty members. “People are often told this is a

Don Eron has taught writing and rhetoric full time at

the University of Colorado at Boulder for 20 years. He

says he earns about $50,000 a year, has excellent health
benefits, and is building a retirement fund. But he
wishes he had tenure.

It would give him greater job security and the freedom
to say unpopular things. “After a while you want to

contribute your expertise and knowledge about pedagogy

to your program,” he says. “But if your point of view differs
from the director, you are discouraged from doing so.”

“At your own institution,
	 they already have your
	 intellectual capital, so
	 it doesn’t add anything
	 for them to promote you.”
Mr. Eron, though, doesn’t expect to ever get tenure

at Boulder, or anywhere else. “If you are applying for
jobs at your own institution, they already have your

intellectual capital, so it doesn’t add anything for them

to promote you,” he says. And full-time instructors who
apply for tenure-track jobs elsewhere often carry a

stigma: “If you haven’t been able to get tenure where
you are, they wonder, how good can you be? You are
wearing that scarlet letter.”

12
CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 14

9/20/13 11:29 AM
The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013

The AAUP report does show that not all full-time

instructors working off the tenure track are qualified for

Mr. Eron, 59, has an M.F.A., which is considered a

terminal degree for teaching creative writing but not

tenure-track jobs. While just over half of those

for tenure-track professors in his field, rhetoric

master’s in business administration.

instructor will end how it began: without tenure.

surveyed said they held doctorates, 28 percent had only
a master’s degree. That figure does not include people
with terminal degrees, like a master’s of fine arts or a

and composition.

He is getting ready to retire, and his career as a college

Limits on Pay and Support for Full-Time Faculty
Off the Tenure Track
With fixed-term appointments and limited support from their colleges, full-time faculty who work off the tenure track—
a growing proportion of the professoriate—effectively constitute a “second tier of the academic labor structure,” the
American Association of University Professors says in this year’s report on the economic status of faculty.

Median salaries for full-time faculty who are off the tenure track
Median salaries for full-time faculty who are off the tenure track
Median salaries for full-time faculty who are off the tenure track
Median salaries for full-time faculty who are off the tenure track
$47,500
$47,500
$47,500
$47,500

$45,000
$45,000
$45,000
$45,000

$51,000
$51,000
$51,000
$51,000

All
Private, nonMedian salaries for full-time faculty Public off the tenure track
who are
All
Public
Private, noncolleges
All
colleges
$47,500
All
colleges
colleges

$45,000

colleges
Public
colleges
$51,000
Public
colleges
colleges

profit colleges
Private, nonprofit colleges
$50,000
Private, nonprofit colleges
profit colleges

$50,000
$50,000
$50,000
$50,000

Private, forPrivate, forprofit colleges
Private, forprofit colleges
Private, forprofit colleges
profit colleges

% of full-time faculty off the tenure track who report having access to
% of full-time faculty off the tenure track who report having access to
various types of institutional support and who report having access to
% of full-time of Public off the tenure trackPrivate, forAll
Private, nonvarious types faculty off the tenure track who report having access to
institutional support and activities
activities
% colleges
of full-time faculty
colleges
profit colleges
profit colleges
various types of institutional support and activities
various types of institutional support and activities

Participation in departmental meetings
Participation in departmental meetings
Participation in departmental meetings
% of full-time faculty off the tenure track who report having access to
Participation in departmental meetings
various types of institutional support and activities
Support for travel to professional meetings
Support for travel to professional meetings
Participation in departmental meetings
Support for travel to professional meetings
52.9%
77.6%
52.9%
Support for travel to professional meetings
Support for travel to professional meetings
52.9%
Ability to submit research grants with institutional support 52.9%
Ability to submit research grants with institutional support
52.9%
41.1%
Ability to submit research grants with institutional support
Ability to submit researchresearch grants with institutional support
41.1%
Ability to submit grants with institutional support
41.1%
41.1%
Priority consideration for tenure-track openings
41.1%
Priority consideration for tenure-track openings
Priority consideration for tenure-track openings
3.1%
Priority consideration for tenure-track openings
3.1%
3.1%
Priority consideration for tenure-track openings
3.1%
Note: Data are for fall 2010, the most recent available.
Note:3.1% are for fall 2010, the most recent available.
Data

77.6%
77.6%
77.6%
77.6%

Note: Data are for fall 2010, the most recent available.
Note: Data are for fall 2010, the most recent available.
Note: Data are for fall 2010, the most recent available.

SOURCE: American Association of University Professors’ analysis of the survey of contingent faculty members and
	
instructors, Fall 2010, by Coalition on the Academic Workforce

13
CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 15

9/20/13 11:29 AM
The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013

Average Salaries of Full-Time Faculty Members, 2012-13
All Institutions

Public

Salary

1-year
change

Men’s
salary

Women’s
salary

Women’s salary
as a percentage
of men’s

$134,747

2.6%

$137,908

$124,511

90.3%

Professor

Associate professor

$88,306

2.1%

$90,945

$84,377

92.8%

Assistant professor

$76,822

2.6%

$80,260

$72,973

Instructor

$51,116

2.4%

$52,732

Lecturer

$57,225

—

No rank

$68,153

All

Salary

1-year
change

$123,393

2.1%

Professor

Associate professor

$84,275

1.9%

Associate profe

90.9%

Assistant professor

$73,212

2.6%

Assistant profe

$50,008

94.8%

Instructor

$48,359

2.4%

Instructor

$61,034

$54,112

88.7%

Lecturer

$54,382

—

Lecturer

—

$73,345

$63,377

86.4%

No rank

$55,905

—

No rank

$96,686

2.0%

$105,584

$82,522

78.2%

All

$89,657

1.7%

Professor

$92,522

1.0%

$94,333

$89,076

94.4%

Professor

$88,988

0.6%

Professor

Associate professor

$73,103

1.2%

$74,566

$71,351

95.7%

Associate professor

$71,343

1.0%

Associate profe

Assistant professor

$62,184

1.6%

$63,495

$61,052

96.2%

Assistant professor

$61,041

1.3%

Assistant profe

Instructor

$47,098

2.3%

$47,916

$46,623

97.3%

Instructor

$45,258

2.0%

Instructor

Lecturer

$49,626

—

$51,135

$48,506

94.9%

Lecturer

$48,086

—

Lecturer

No rank

$55,624

—

$58,604

$52,962

90.4%

No rank

$51,506

—

No rank

All

$71,620

1.1%

$75,843

$66,819

88.1%

All

$69,149

0.8%

Professor

$91,935

1.9%

$83,161

$89,602

107.7%

Professor

$86,427

1.1%

Professor

Associate professor

$70,334

1.7%

$71,264

$69,232

97.1%

Associate professor

$70,066

1.2%

Associate profe

Assistant professor

$58,406

2.0%

$59,053

$57,819

97.9%

Assistant professor

$58,591

1.5%

Assistant profe

Instructor

$47,915

2.9%

$48,331

$47,666

98.6%

Instructor

$48,798

3.5%

Instructor

Lecturer

$52,116

—

$54,001

$50,701

93.9%

Lecturer

$49,064

—

Lecturer

No rank

$58,028

—

$61,598

$54,277

88.1%

No rank

$45,904

—

No rank

All

$70,774

1.9%

$74,086

$66,882

90.3%

All

$66,298

1.2%

Doctoral institutions
Professor

Doctoral institutions

Master’s institutions

Doctoral inst

Master’s institutions

Baccalaureate institutions

Master’s inst

Baccalaureate institutions

Two-year institutions with academic ranks

All

All

Baccalaureat

All

Two-year institutions with academic ranks

Two-year ins

Professor

$74,526

–0.7%

$75,076

$73,930

98.5%

Professor

$74,845

–0.7%

Professor

Associate professor

$60,821

–0.8%

$61,799

$59,985

97.1%

Associate professor

$60,876

–0.8%

Associate profe

Assistant professor

$52,643

–1.0%

$52,985

$52,365

98.8%

Assistant professor

$52,754

–1.0%

Assistant profe

Instructor

$45,244

–1.6%

$45,484

$45,052

99.1%

Instructor

$45,314

–1.7%

Instructor

Lecturer

$45,824

—

$45,953

$45,747

99.6%

Lecturer

$45,819

—

Lecturer

No rank

$40,226

—

$39,502

$40,668

103.0%

No rank

$41,685

—

No rank

All

$58,884

–1.0%

$60,145

$57,774

96.1%

All

$59,002

–1.1%

1.1%

$63,046

$62,075

98.5%

$116,419

2.1%

$120,797

$105,402

87.3%

Professor

Associate professor

$80,116

1.7%

$82,628

$76,797

92.9%

Assistant professor

$68,025

2.1%

$70,781

$65,321

Instructor

$48,725

2.0%

$49,802

Lecturer

$54,475

—

No rank

$64,343

All

$84,303

Two-year institutions without academic ranks
All

$62,523

Two-year institutions without academic ranks

All institutions with academic ranks
Professor

All

Two-year ins

All

All

$62,776

1.0%

All institutions with academic ranks

All institution

$110,143

1.6%

Professor

Associate professor

$78,529

1.5%

Associate profe

92.3%

Assistant professor

$67,097

2.0%

Assistant profe

$48,024

96.4%

Instructor

$46,926

1.7%

Instructor

$57,563

$52,045

90.4%

Lecturer

$51,965

—

Lecturer

—

$68,880

$60,141

87.3%

No rank

$54,005

—

No rank

1.7%

$91,994

$73,932

80.4%

All

$80,578

1.3%

All

14
CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 16

9/20/13 11:29 AM
The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013

Average Salaries of Full-Time Faculty Members, 2012-13
Private, Independent

Religious

Salary

ar
ge

1-year
change

Doctoral institutions

Salary

1-year
change

Doctoral institutions

%

Professor

$167,118

3.4%

Professor

$139,194

2.6%

%

Associate professor

$104,016

2.4%

Associate professor

$94,199

2.7%

%

Assistant professor

$90,622

2.1%

Assistant professor

$79,849

2.1%

%

Instructor

$63,269

3.7%

Instructor

$63,830

0.4%

—

Lecturer

$66,519

—

Lecturer

$58,942

—

—

No rank

$77,561

—

No rank

$73,557

—

%

All

$120,701

2.6%

$100,093

2.2%

$104,186

1.6%

Master’s institutions

All

Master’s institutions

%

Professor

Professor

$94,031

2.1%

%

Associate professor

$78,125

1.6%

Associate professor

$73,114

1.4%

%

Assistant professor

$66,050

1.9%

Assistant professor

$61,487

2.2%

%

Instructor

$52,899

3.4%

Instructor

$51,987

3.1%

—

Lecturer

$58,312

—

Lecturer

$52,966

—

—

No rank

$66,503

—

No rank

$62,292

—

%

All

$79,438

1.7%

All

$72,529

1.9%

$104,335

2.2%

Baccalaureate institutions

Baccalaureate institutions

%

Professor

Professor

$78,629

1.8%

%

Associate professor

$76,993

2.1%

Associate professor

$63,244

1.3%

%

Assistant professor

$62,763

2.2%

Assistant professor

$53,901

2.1%

%

Instructor

$49,990

2.4%

Instructor

$45,802

2.4%

—

Lecturer

$60,939

—

Lecturer

$43,831

—

—

No rank

$63,581

—

No rank

$50,134

—

%

All

$80,109

2.2%

All

$63,092

1.9%

Two-year institutions with academic ranks

Two-year institutions with academic ranks

%

Professor

—

—

Professor

—

—

%

Associate professor

—

—

Associate professor

—

—

%

Assistant professor

—

—

Assistant professor

—

—

%

Instructor

—

—

Instructor

—

—

—

Lecturer

—

—

Lecturer

—

—

—

No rank

—

—

No rank

—

—

%

All

—

—

All

—

—

%

Two-year institutions without academic ranks
All

—

Two-year institutions without academic ranks
—

All institutions with academic ranks

All

—

—

All institutions with academic ranks

$139,620

3.0%

Professor

$100,351

2.4%

NOTE:

Associate professor

$88,301

2.0%

Associate professor

$74,602

1.6%

%

Assistant professor

$74,664

2.3%

Assistant professor

$61,881

2.3%
2.9%

Dollar figures are based on data from 1,142 institutions; percentage
changes are based on data from 1,095 institutions that reported
comparable data for both years. As a result, the percentage changes
refer to a slightly different set of dollar figures than those shown.
Percentages are not adjusted for inflation. Dollar figures do not reflect
all pay reductions caused by unpaid furloughs attributed to the recession.
The figures cover full-time members of the instructional staff, except
those in medical schools. The salaries are adjusted to a standard ninemonth work year. A dash indicates that no data were reported.

%

Professor

%

%

Instructor

$56,530

3.3%

Instructor

$51,950

—

Lecturer

$64,480

—

Lecturer

$53,751

—

—

No rank

$74,042

—

No rank

$67,657

—

%

All

$99,771

2.4%

All

$75,857

2.1%

SOURCE: American Association of University Professors

15
CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 17

9/20/13 11:29 AM
ulty Profile

Salaries Over Time

For a complete view into the AAUP Salary Survey data,
including a look at how faculty salaries have changed over time,
go to Chronicle.com/salarysurvey

CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 18

9/20/13 11:29 AM
FREE WITH EVERY
EMPLOYEE PLAN:

CONFIDENCE.
According to survey results, employees in TIAA-CREF
plans are five times more confident about retirement
than the average American worker.1 That’s what
happens when they get expert advice and Lipper
Award-winning funds. Confidence, it’s another way we
deliver Outcomes That Matter for your employees.

Award-winning funds to get
employees to and through retirement.
Get started at tiaa-cref.org/5times.

BEST OVERALL
LARGE FUND
COMPANY2

As compared to the average American worker. TIAA-CREF participant survey (n=2,376), advice = April through September
2011 and 2011 Retirement Confidence Survey Results by EBRI (Mar ’11). 2 In calculating the awards, Lipper considered
funds registered for sale in the United States with at least 36 months of performance as of the end of the calendar year of
the respective evaluation year. Fund groups with at least five equity, five bond or three mixed-asset portfolios were eligible
for an overall group award. The award is given to the group with the lowest average decile ranking of three years’ Consistent
Return measure of the eligible funds over the three-year period ended 11/30/12. TIAA-CREF was ranked against 36 fund
companies. Investment, insurance and annuity products are not FDIC insured, are not bank guaranteed, are not deposits,
are not insured by any federal government agency, are not a condition to any banking service or activity, and may lose
value. TIAA-CREF Individual & Institutional Services, LLC and Teachers Personal Investors Services, Inc., members FINRA,
distribute securities products. ©2013 Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association-College Retirement Equities Fund
(TIAA-CREF), 730 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017. C11891
TIAA-CREF products may be subject to market and other risk factors. See the applicable product literature, or
visit tiaa-cref.org for details. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

The Lipper Award
is based on a review
of 36 companies’
2012 risk-adjusted
performance.

Consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before
investing. Visit tiaa-cref.org for product and fund prospectuses that contain this and
other information. Read carefully before investing.

1

CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 19

9/20/13 11:29 AM
Sponsored by:

1255 Twenty-Third Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037
(202) 466-1000 | Chronicle.com
Copyright © 2013

CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 20

9/20/13 11:29 AM

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Semelhante a Faculty salary survey 2013 - Chronicle of Higher Ed

Matthew_Sullivan_Honors_Thesis
Matthew_Sullivan_Honors_ThesisMatthew_Sullivan_Honors_Thesis
Matthew_Sullivan_Honors_ThesisMatthew Sullivan
 
Career and Tech Educaiton
Career and Tech EducaitonCareer and Tech Educaiton
Career and Tech EducaitonMicah Smith
 
Ethical Viewpoints Assignment - WorksheetResearch QuestionSee .docx
Ethical Viewpoints Assignment - WorksheetResearch QuestionSee .docxEthical Viewpoints Assignment - WorksheetResearch QuestionSee .docx
Ethical Viewpoints Assignment - WorksheetResearch QuestionSee .docxhumphrieskalyn
 
6 facts you must know about student loans and college debt
6 facts you must know about student loans and college debt6 facts you must know about student loans and college debt
6 facts you must know about student loans and college debtpauldylan06
 
College Can Be Expensive - How Do You Pick the Right One?
College Can Be Expensive - How Do You Pick the Right One?College Can Be Expensive - How Do You Pick the Right One?
College Can Be Expensive - How Do You Pick the Right One?PayScale, Inc.
 
6 July 25, 2011 www.ccweek.comIt’s an article of faith f.docx
6 July 25, 2011 www.ccweek.comIt’s an article of faith f.docx6 July 25, 2011 www.ccweek.comIt’s an article of faith f.docx
6 July 25, 2011 www.ccweek.comIt’s an article of faith f.docxalinainglis
 
AN INTERIM REPORT ON A PILOT CREDITRECOVERY PROGRAM IN A LAR.docx
AN INTERIM REPORT ON A PILOT CREDITRECOVERY PROGRAM IN A LAR.docxAN INTERIM REPORT ON A PILOT CREDITRECOVERY PROGRAM IN A LAR.docx
AN INTERIM REPORT ON A PILOT CREDITRECOVERY PROGRAM IN A LAR.docxnettletondevon
 
CSU-Pueblo’s budget worries part of a national trend
CSU-Pueblo’s budget worries part of a national trendCSU-Pueblo’s budget worries part of a national trend
CSU-Pueblo’s budget worries part of a national trendNathaniel Welch
 
Institutional Retention Strategies at Historically Black Colleges and Univers...
Institutional Retention Strategies at Historically Black Colleges and Univers...Institutional Retention Strategies at Historically Black Colleges and Univers...
Institutional Retention Strategies at Historically Black Colleges and Univers...Dawn Follin
 
McKinsey & Company - Voice of the Graduate
McKinsey & Company - Voice of the GraduateMcKinsey & Company - Voice of the Graduate
McKinsey & Company - Voice of the GraduateVocatio
 
AnnualReport2013
AnnualReport2013AnnualReport2013
AnnualReport2013Joe Forte
 
Need For Change sidonye williams
Need For Change sidonye williamsNeed For Change sidonye williams
Need For Change sidonye williamssidonye
 
Financing the Dream: Securing College Affordability for the Middle Class
Financing the Dream: Securing College Affordability for the Middle ClassFinancing the Dream: Securing College Affordability for the Middle Class
Financing the Dream: Securing College Affordability for the Middle ClassObama White House
 
Primer [education]
Primer [education]Primer [education]
Primer [education]VJCiGlobe
 

Semelhante a Faculty salary survey 2013 - Chronicle of Higher Ed (20)

Matthew_Sullivan_Honors_Thesis
Matthew_Sullivan_Honors_ThesisMatthew_Sullivan_Honors_Thesis
Matthew_Sullivan_Honors_Thesis
 
Career and Tech Educaiton
Career and Tech EducaitonCareer and Tech Educaiton
Career and Tech Educaiton
 
Ethical Viewpoints Assignment - WorksheetResearch QuestionSee .docx
Ethical Viewpoints Assignment - WorksheetResearch QuestionSee .docxEthical Viewpoints Assignment - WorksheetResearch QuestionSee .docx
Ethical Viewpoints Assignment - WorksheetResearch QuestionSee .docx
 
6 facts you must know about student loans and college debt
6 facts you must know about student loans and college debt6 facts you must know about student loans and college debt
6 facts you must know about student loans and college debt
 
A News to Rejoice (1)...
A News to Rejoice (1)...A News to Rejoice (1)...
A News to Rejoice (1)...
 
College Can Be Expensive - How Do You Pick the Right One?
College Can Be Expensive - How Do You Pick the Right One?College Can Be Expensive - How Do You Pick the Right One?
College Can Be Expensive - How Do You Pick the Right One?
 
6 July 25, 2011 www.ccweek.comIt’s an article of faith f.docx
6 July 25, 2011 www.ccweek.comIt’s an article of faith f.docx6 July 25, 2011 www.ccweek.comIt’s an article of faith f.docx
6 July 25, 2011 www.ccweek.comIt’s an article of faith f.docx
 
AN INTERIM REPORT ON A PILOT CREDITRECOVERY PROGRAM IN A LAR.docx
AN INTERIM REPORT ON A PILOT CREDITRECOVERY PROGRAM IN A LAR.docxAN INTERIM REPORT ON A PILOT CREDITRECOVERY PROGRAM IN A LAR.docx
AN INTERIM REPORT ON A PILOT CREDITRECOVERY PROGRAM IN A LAR.docx
 
Transforming College to Career
Transforming College to Career Transforming College to Career
Transforming College to Career
 
2010 Rx for Success
2010 Rx for Success2010 Rx for Success
2010 Rx for Success
 
CSU-Pueblo’s budget worries part of a national trend
CSU-Pueblo’s budget worries part of a national trendCSU-Pueblo’s budget worries part of a national trend
CSU-Pueblo’s budget worries part of a national trend
 
Institutional Retention Strategies at Historically Black Colleges and Univers...
Institutional Retention Strategies at Historically Black Colleges and Univers...Institutional Retention Strategies at Historically Black Colleges and Univers...
Institutional Retention Strategies at Historically Black Colleges and Univers...
 
McKinsey & Company - Voice of the Graduate
McKinsey & Company - Voice of the GraduateMcKinsey & Company - Voice of the Graduate
McKinsey & Company - Voice of the Graduate
 
Final Project Paper
Final Project PaperFinal Project Paper
Final Project Paper
 
AnnualReport2013
AnnualReport2013AnnualReport2013
AnnualReport2013
 
Need For Change sidonye williams
Need For Change sidonye williamsNeed For Change sidonye williams
Need For Change sidonye williams
 
School leaders survey 2015
School leaders survey 2015School leaders survey 2015
School leaders survey 2015
 
LUVRules Social Purpose Grant
LUVRules Social Purpose GrantLUVRules Social Purpose Grant
LUVRules Social Purpose Grant
 
Financing the Dream: Securing College Affordability for the Middle Class
Financing the Dream: Securing College Affordability for the Middle ClassFinancing the Dream: Securing College Affordability for the Middle Class
Financing the Dream: Securing College Affordability for the Middle Class
 
Primer [education]
Primer [education]Primer [education]
Primer [education]
 

Mais de Laura Pasquini

Coaching Conversations
Coaching ConversationsCoaching Conversations
Coaching ConversationsLaura Pasquini
 
Who is Designing Learning Today?
Who is Designing Learning Today? Who is Designing Learning Today?
Who is Designing Learning Today? Laura Pasquini
 
Multimodal Approaches for Learning
Multimodal Approaches for LearningMultimodal Approaches for Learning
Multimodal Approaches for LearningLaura Pasquini
 
Online Learning Librarian @ UNT
Online Learning Librarian @ UNTOnline Learning Librarian @ UNT
Online Learning Librarian @ UNTLaura Pasquini
 
Understanding Facilitation
Understanding FacilitationUnderstanding Facilitation
Understanding FacilitationLaura Pasquini
 
Pod Save Higher Ed: Resources for Podcasting
Pod Save Higher Ed: Resources for PodcastingPod Save Higher Ed: Resources for Podcasting
Pod Save Higher Ed: Resources for PodcastingLaura Pasquini
 
Higher Ed Digital Identity
Higher Ed Digital IdentityHigher Ed Digital Identity
Higher Ed Digital IdentityLaura Pasquini
 
Becoming a Scholar and Author: Publish in the #TACUSPA Journal
Becoming a Scholar and Author: Publish in the #TACUSPA JournalBecoming a Scholar and Author: Publish in the #TACUSPA Journal
Becoming a Scholar and Author: Publish in the #TACUSPA JournalLaura Pasquini
 
The Journal Submission Process
The Journal Submission ProcessThe Journal Submission Process
The Journal Submission ProcessLaura Pasquini
 
#LTEC4121: Presentation of Self Online
#LTEC4121: Presentation of Self Online #LTEC4121: Presentation of Self Online
#LTEC4121: Presentation of Self Online Laura Pasquini
 
APLU: Building Learning Communities Resource
APLU: Building Learning Communities ResourceAPLU: Building Learning Communities Resource
APLU: Building Learning Communities ResourceLaura Pasquini
 
APLU: Building Learning Communities
APLU: Building Learning CommunitiesAPLU: Building Learning Communities
APLU: Building Learning CommunitiesLaura Pasquini
 
HEAL 570: Selecting Technology for Higher Education
HEAL 570: Selecting Technology for Higher EducationHEAL 570: Selecting Technology for Higher Education
HEAL 570: Selecting Technology for Higher EducationLaura Pasquini
 
#WNYAdvising Technology Conference Keynote 2016
#WNYAdvising Technology Conference Keynote 2016#WNYAdvising Technology Conference Keynote 2016
#WNYAdvising Technology Conference Keynote 2016Laura Pasquini
 
#OLCInnovate 2016: Solution Design Summit #OLCInnovateSDS
#OLCInnovate 2016: Solution Design Summit #OLCInnovateSDS#OLCInnovate 2016: Solution Design Summit #OLCInnovateSDS
#OLCInnovate 2016: Solution Design Summit #OLCInnovateSDSLaura Pasquini
 
Why Connected Advising Matters in Higher Ed
Why Connected Advising Matters in Higher EdWhy Connected Advising Matters in Higher Ed
Why Connected Advising Matters in Higher EdLaura Pasquini
 
#nacada15: Higher Education Change & the Culture of Assessment
#nacada15: Higher Education Change & the Culture of Assessment#nacada15: Higher Education Change & the Culture of Assessment
#nacada15: Higher Education Change & the Culture of AssessmentLaura Pasquini
 
#SMsociety15 Panel: More Than Just a “Follower”: How Is Academia Being Influe...
#SMsociety15 Panel: More Than Just a “Follower”: How Is Academia Being Influe...#SMsociety15 Panel: More Than Just a “Follower”: How Is Academia Being Influe...
#SMsociety15 Panel: More Than Just a “Follower”: How Is Academia Being Influe...Laura Pasquini
 

Mais de Laura Pasquini (20)

Coaching Conversations
Coaching ConversationsCoaching Conversations
Coaching Conversations
 
Who is Designing Learning Today?
Who is Designing Learning Today? Who is Designing Learning Today?
Who is Designing Learning Today?
 
Multimodal Approaches for Learning
Multimodal Approaches for LearningMultimodal Approaches for Learning
Multimodal Approaches for Learning
 
Online Learning Librarian @ UNT
Online Learning Librarian @ UNTOnline Learning Librarian @ UNT
Online Learning Librarian @ UNT
 
Understanding Facilitation
Understanding FacilitationUnderstanding Facilitation
Understanding Facilitation
 
Pod Save Higher Ed: Resources for Podcasting
Pod Save Higher Ed: Resources for PodcastingPod Save Higher Ed: Resources for Podcasting
Pod Save Higher Ed: Resources for Podcasting
 
Whats Your Story?
Whats Your Story?Whats Your Story?
Whats Your Story?
 
Higher Ed Digital Identity
Higher Ed Digital IdentityHigher Ed Digital Identity
Higher Ed Digital Identity
 
Becoming a Scholar and Author: Publish in the #TACUSPA Journal
Becoming a Scholar and Author: Publish in the #TACUSPA JournalBecoming a Scholar and Author: Publish in the #TACUSPA Journal
Becoming a Scholar and Author: Publish in the #TACUSPA Journal
 
The Journal Submission Process
The Journal Submission ProcessThe Journal Submission Process
The Journal Submission Process
 
#LTEC4121: Presentation of Self Online
#LTEC4121: Presentation of Self Online #LTEC4121: Presentation of Self Online
#LTEC4121: Presentation of Self Online
 
APLU: Building Learning Communities Resource
APLU: Building Learning Communities ResourceAPLU: Building Learning Communities Resource
APLU: Building Learning Communities Resource
 
APLU: Building Learning Communities
APLU: Building Learning CommunitiesAPLU: Building Learning Communities
APLU: Building Learning Communities
 
HEAL 570: Selecting Technology for Higher Education
HEAL 570: Selecting Technology for Higher EducationHEAL 570: Selecting Technology for Higher Education
HEAL 570: Selecting Technology for Higher Education
 
#WNYAdvising Technology Conference Keynote 2016
#WNYAdvising Technology Conference Keynote 2016#WNYAdvising Technology Conference Keynote 2016
#WNYAdvising Technology Conference Keynote 2016
 
#OLCInnovate 2016: Solution Design Summit #OLCInnovateSDS
#OLCInnovate 2016: Solution Design Summit #OLCInnovateSDS#OLCInnovate 2016: Solution Design Summit #OLCInnovateSDS
#OLCInnovate 2016: Solution Design Summit #OLCInnovateSDS
 
Why Connected Advising Matters in Higher Ed
Why Connected Advising Matters in Higher EdWhy Connected Advising Matters in Higher Ed
Why Connected Advising Matters in Higher Ed
 
#nacada15: Higher Education Change & the Culture of Assessment
#nacada15: Higher Education Change & the Culture of Assessment#nacada15: Higher Education Change & the Culture of Assessment
#nacada15: Higher Education Change & the Culture of Assessment
 
#SMsociety15 Panel: More Than Just a “Follower”: How Is Academia Being Influe...
#SMsociety15 Panel: More Than Just a “Follower”: How Is Academia Being Influe...#SMsociety15 Panel: More Than Just a “Follower”: How Is Academia Being Influe...
#SMsociety15 Panel: More Than Just a “Follower”: How Is Academia Being Influe...
 
The #AdvSelfie:
The #AdvSelfie:The #AdvSelfie:
The #AdvSelfie:
 

Último

Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...Seán Kennedy
 
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatEarth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatYousafMalik24
 
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4MiaBumagat1
 
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemConcurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemChristalin Nelson
 
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY - GERBNER.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY -  GERBNER.pptxAUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY -  GERBNER.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY - GERBNER.pptxiammrhaywood
 
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-designKeynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-designMIPLM
 
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptxMULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptxAnupkumar Sharma
 
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 3 STEPS Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 3 STEPS Using Odoo 17Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 3 STEPS Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 3 STEPS Using Odoo 17Celine George
 
ROLES IN A STAGE PRODUCTION in arts.pptx
ROLES IN A STAGE PRODUCTION in arts.pptxROLES IN A STAGE PRODUCTION in arts.pptx
ROLES IN A STAGE PRODUCTION in arts.pptxVanesaIglesias10
 
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.ppt
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.pptIntegumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.ppt
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.pptshraddhaparab530
 
Activity 2-unit 2-update 2024. English translation
Activity 2-unit 2-update 2024. English translationActivity 2-unit 2-update 2024. English translation
Activity 2-unit 2-update 2024. English translationRosabel UA
 
Inclusivity Essentials_ Creating Accessible Websites for Nonprofits .pdf
Inclusivity Essentials_ Creating Accessible Websites for Nonprofits .pdfInclusivity Essentials_ Creating Accessible Websites for Nonprofits .pdf
Inclusivity Essentials_ Creating Accessible Websites for Nonprofits .pdfTechSoup
 
Music 9 - 4th quarter - Vocal Music of the Romantic Period.pptx
Music 9 - 4th quarter - Vocal Music of the Romantic Period.pptxMusic 9 - 4th quarter - Vocal Music of the Romantic Period.pptx
Music 9 - 4th quarter - Vocal Music of the Romantic Period.pptxleah joy valeriano
 
Global Lehigh Strategic Initiatives (without descriptions)
Global Lehigh Strategic Initiatives (without descriptions)Global Lehigh Strategic Initiatives (without descriptions)
Global Lehigh Strategic Initiatives (without descriptions)cama23
 
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERP
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERPHow to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERP
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERPCeline George
 
Active Learning Strategies (in short ALS).pdf
Active Learning Strategies (in short ALS).pdfActive Learning Strategies (in short ALS).pdf
Active Learning Strategies (in short ALS).pdfPatidar M
 
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17Celine George
 
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Celine George
 

Último (20)

Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...
Student Profile Sample - We help schools to connect the data they have, with ...
 
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice greatEarth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
Earth Day Presentation wow hello nice great
 
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
ANG SEKTOR NG agrikultura.pptx QUARTER 4
 
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management systemConcurrency Control in Database Management system
Concurrency Control in Database Management system
 
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY - GERBNER.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY -  GERBNER.pptxAUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY -  GERBNER.pptx
AUDIENCE THEORY -CULTIVATION THEORY - GERBNER.pptx
 
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-designKeynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
Keynote by Prof. Wurzer at Nordex about IP-design
 
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptxMULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
MULTIDISCIPLINRY NATURE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES.pptx
 
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 3 STEPS Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 3 STEPS Using Odoo 17Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 3 STEPS Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 3 STEPS Using Odoo 17
 
ROLES IN A STAGE PRODUCTION in arts.pptx
ROLES IN A STAGE PRODUCTION in arts.pptxROLES IN A STAGE PRODUCTION in arts.pptx
ROLES IN A STAGE PRODUCTION in arts.pptx
 
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
HỌC TỐT TIẾNG ANH 11 THEO CHƯƠNG TRÌNH GLOBAL SUCCESS ĐÁP ÁN CHI TIẾT - CẢ NĂ...
 
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.ppt
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.pptIntegumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.ppt
Integumentary System SMP B. Pharm Sem I.ppt
 
Activity 2-unit 2-update 2024. English translation
Activity 2-unit 2-update 2024. English translationActivity 2-unit 2-update 2024. English translation
Activity 2-unit 2-update 2024. English translation
 
Inclusivity Essentials_ Creating Accessible Websites for Nonprofits .pdf
Inclusivity Essentials_ Creating Accessible Websites for Nonprofits .pdfInclusivity Essentials_ Creating Accessible Websites for Nonprofits .pdf
Inclusivity Essentials_ Creating Accessible Websites for Nonprofits .pdf
 
Music 9 - 4th quarter - Vocal Music of the Romantic Period.pptx
Music 9 - 4th quarter - Vocal Music of the Romantic Period.pptxMusic 9 - 4th quarter - Vocal Music of the Romantic Period.pptx
Music 9 - 4th quarter - Vocal Music of the Romantic Period.pptx
 
Global Lehigh Strategic Initiatives (without descriptions)
Global Lehigh Strategic Initiatives (without descriptions)Global Lehigh Strategic Initiatives (without descriptions)
Global Lehigh Strategic Initiatives (without descriptions)
 
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERP
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERPHow to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERP
How to do quick user assign in kanban in Odoo 17 ERP
 
YOUVE GOT EMAIL_FINALS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
YOUVE GOT EMAIL_FINALS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptxYOUVE GOT EMAIL_FINALS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
YOUVE GOT EMAIL_FINALS_EL_DORADO_2024.pptx
 
Active Learning Strategies (in short ALS).pdf
Active Learning Strategies (in short ALS).pdfActive Learning Strategies (in short ALS).pdf
Active Learning Strategies (in short ALS).pdf
 
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
Field Attribute Index Feature in Odoo 17
 
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
Difference Between Search & Browse Methods in Odoo 17
 

Faculty salary survey 2013 - Chronicle of Higher Ed

  • 1. FACULTY SALARIES INCH UP Increase Just Matches Inflation Findings from the AAUP Salary Survey S Faculty Salaries Faculty Profile Salaries Over Time Sponsored by: CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 1 9/20/13 11:29 AM
  • 2. THE SECRET TO A STABLE RETIREMENT? A STABLE INVESTMENT PROVIDER. Last year, TIAA-CREF paid out $4.3 billion in retirement income.1 We help millions of people in nonprofit businesses plan and manage retirement, more than any other financial services provider.2 It’s how we deliver Outcomes That Matter for your employees. Nearly a century of lifetime income payments to get employees through retirement.3 Get started at tiaa-cref.org/lifetime. 1 In 2012, TIAA-CREF plan participants received annualized payments of $4.3 billion through TIAA-CREF lifetime annuity contracts. 2 Source: LIMRA, Not-for-Profit Market Survey, first-quarter 2013 results. Based on a survey of 29 companies. 3 Lifetime income is a guarantee subject to TIAA’s claims-paying ability. Investment, insurance and annuity products are not FDIC insured, are not bank guaranteed, are not deposits, are not insured by any federal government agency, are not a condition to any banking service or activity, and may lose value. TIAA-CREF Individual & Institutional Services, LLC and Teachers Personal Investors Services, Inc., members FINRA, distribute securities products. ©2013 Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association-College Retirement Equities Fund (TIAA-CREF), 730 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017. C11882 TIAA-CREF products may be subject to market and other risk factors. See the applicable product literature, or visit tiaa-cref.org for details. Past performance does not guarantee future results. CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 2 9/20/13 11:29 AM
  • 3. CONTENTS 3 FACULTY PAY RISES SLIGHTLY 4 AS PUBLIC-PRIVATE PAY GAP WIDENS, STATE UNIVERSITIES TRY TO HANG ON TO FACULTY 8 COLLEGES BEGIN TO REWARD PROFESSORS FOR DOING WORK THAT ACTUALLY MATTERS TO THEM 11 FOR FULL-TIME INSTRUCTORS, WORK OFF THE TENURE TRACK BECOMES ITS OWN CAREER 14 Average Salaries of Full-Time Faculty Members, 2012-13 CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 3 9/20/13 11:29 AM
  • 4. ulty Salaries CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 4 Faculty Profile 9/20/13 11:29 AM
  • 5. The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013 FACULTY PAY RISES SLIGHTLY Pay increase of 1.7%, matching inflation, puts average salary at $84,000 The news about faculty salaries is “not all bad,” says a report by the American Association of University Professors on the economic status of the profession. But it’s not all that great, either. The average faculty salary for 2012-13 is just over $84,000, reflecting an increase of 1.7 percent over last year. That matches the rate of inflation, marking the first time in four years that professors’ pay did not lose ground in that regard. Full-time professors who have remained at the same institutions received salary increases averaging 3.2 percent, marginally higher than in recent years. And growing numbers of colleges are broadening their reward systems for faculty, more often counting digital work and public-service oriented research in decisions about awarding raises, bonuses, promotions, and tenure. But the average pay increases for full-time faculty this year are well below the average level of annual increases over the past decade. And professors at public colleges are seeing their salaries fall ever further behind those of their peers at private colleges. For full-timers who work off the tenure track—now nearly two of every five full-time faculty members—data in the report show that the likelihood of their jumping to better-paying jobs on the tenure track is slim. “Important long-term trends,” the report says, “are still heading in the wrong direction for higher education.” — SARA HEBEL 3 CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 5 9/20/13 11:29 AM
  • 6. The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013 AS PUBLIC-PRIVATE GAP WIDENS, STATE UNIVERSITIES TRY TO HANG ON TO FACULTY by SYDNI DUNN Eric J. Barron, president of Florida State University, is fighting a faculty exodus. Florida State isn’t the only public university hard put to find money for faculty salaries. Nationally, the gap between what public and private colleges pay their The university has struggled to retain good professors professors has only continued to grow, according to In fact, the president warned state officials last During this academic year, the average salary across because it’s been unable to reward them with big salary increases, or with any increases at all. year, budget cuts have started to turn his university into a “farm team” for institutions outside the state, a place where young faculty start their careers, gain experience, and soon take their training and expertise elsewhere. “We exceed our national ranking in every metric,” Mr. Barron says. “Where do we not exceed our rank? We don’t in terms of what we pay for faculty salaries and what we can invest in the academic program.” an annual report released by the American Association of University Professors. all faculty ranks at private colleges was $99,771, an increase of 2.4 percent from the previous academic year. At public colleges, the average salary was $80,578, a 1.3 percent increase. The public-sector disadvantage is greatest for full professors. At public master’s-level colleges, they earn 17 percent less than do their peers at private institutions. Those at public doctoral universities earn 35 percent less than their peers at private doctoral institutions, according to the report. 4 CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 6 9/20/13 11:29 AM
  • 7. The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013 Daniel J. Hurley, director of state relations and policy analysis at the American Association of State Colleges and Universities, says some public universities haven’t been able to give any salary increases for the past four to five years because state budgets have remained tight. “That conversation is certainly not happening at private institutions,” he says. “Private institutions are able to recruit and pay for the top talent.” At Florida State, faculty salaries for the highest-ranked professors this academic year fall significantly below the average, according to the AAUP report. The average pay for full professors at Florida State is $109,400, which is 11 percent less than the average for those at all public doctoral institutions. “A legislature has to know and understand the stresses being applied.” For associate professors, the average pay at Florida State is $76,700, which is 9 percent less than the average for all public doctoral institutions. Assistant professors, however, earn 5 percent more at Florida State than their peers at public doctoral institutions, whose average salary is $77,100. “The salary offers that professors received for jobs elsewhere were as much as $20,000, or 28 percent, higher than their salaries on the Tallahassee, Fla., campus”, Mr. Barron says. “Our faculty love this university and love this region, but it’s tough to turn down something that’s a significant raise,” he says. Popular destinations for departing faculty have included public and private colleges in Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Texas. While public colleges in many states have seen their appropriations drop in recent years, Florida’s cuts have been among the deepest. State appropriations for higher education in Florida decreased by 31.3 percent from the 2008 to the 2013 fiscal years. Yuri Gershtein, a former assistant professor of physics at Florida State, says Rutgers University recruited him for its physics department in 2008. Mr. Gershtein, now an associate professor, says the salary offer, in terms of the dollar amount, was “a pretty significant bump” from his pay in Florida. “Florida State was always good at the initial offers, and that was the strategy,” he says. “The initial offer is high, but then the salary doesn’t grow.” Todd Adams, an associate professor of physics at Florida ‘TOUGH TO TURN DOWN’ State, says the “upheaval” of faculty makes it difficult to by both private and public institutions”, Mr. Barron says. one of best places they can be,” says Mr. Adams, who is a “Florida State’s faculty members have been lured away Of the 58 professors in the College of Arts and Sciences who were offered jobs at other universities last year, Florida State was able to persuade only eight to stay. recruit new professors. “You want to convince them they would be coming to member of the Faculty Senate. But “it’s hard to sing praises and say, ‘It’s going to be great, and your salary will keep going up,’ when it may not.” 5 CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 7 9/20/13 11:29 AM
  • 8. The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013 Mr. Barron, Florida State’s president, has been looking But Mr. Barron’s message to state lawmakers is that So far this academic year, 36 professors from Florida institutions is allowed to continue to grow. for ways to improve retention and put more money into the faculty. State have moved elsewhere. But Mr. Barron says they will all be replaced. He even expects that the university will be able to add to its faculty. The university has found ways to save money, such as lowering campus energy consumption, and is putting more money toward some faculty pay raises “It is not in the position to do anything across the board,” he says, but there is enough money to provide some performance- based raises, including those accompanying promotions and given out at post tenure reviews. such increases are not enough, that Florida State and public universities like it will be left behind if the gap between their salaries and those of their peer private “Nobody wants to wave a white flag that says, ‘People are stealing my faculty,’ yet I think a legislature has to know and understand the stresses being applied,” Mr. Barron says. “If you want to be nationally competitive, if you want to have top ranks, if you want to keep the best and brightest, then don’t spend all your money sitting there getting a faculty member started and once they prove to be excellent have them go somewhere else.” 6 CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 8 9/20/13 11:29 AM
  • 9. The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013 How the gap has grown over the past 10 years Difference in Faculty Pay Between Public and Private $100,000 Colleges Continues to Widen $90,000 How the gap has grown over the past 10 years $80,000 $70,000 $100,000 Gap in 2013: 24% $60,000 $90,000 $50,000 $80,000 Gap in 2004: 18% $40,000 $70,000 Gap in 2013: 24% $30,000 $60,000 $20,000 $50,000 Private colleges Average faculty salary at Gap in 2004: 18% $10,000 $40,000 Public colleges 0 $30,000 $20,000 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Private colleges Average faculty salary at $10,000 S 0 Faculty Salaries 2004 2005 2006 Faculty Profile 2007 2010 2008 2009 2011 2012 2013 Public colleges 2010 Salaries Over Time 2011 2012 2013 How faculty pay at public and private colleges differs in 2012-13 S Faculty Salaries Faculty Profile Private colleges Salaries Over Time Public colleges Average salary Average Average one-year salary increase How faculty pay at public and private colleges differs in 2012-13 Average one-year increase Full professor $139,620 colleges 3.0% Private $110,143 colleges 1.6% Public Associate professor Average $88,301 salary Average $78,529 salary Assistant professor Full professor Lecturer Associate professor All combined Assistant professor $74,664 $139,620 $56,530 $88,301 $99,771 $74,664 Average 2.0% one-year increase 2.3% 3.0% 3.3% 2.0% 2.4% 2.3% $67,097 $110,143 $46,926 $78,529 $80,578 $67,097 Average 1.5% one-year increase 2.0% 1.6% 1.7% 1.5% 1.3% 2.0% Lecturer $56,530 3.3% $46,926 1.7% All combined $99,771 2.4% $80,578 1.3% SOURCE: American Association of University Professors 7 CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 9 9/20/13 11:29 AM
  • 10. The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013 COLLEGES BEGIN TO REWARD PROFESSORS FOR DOING WORK THAT MATTERS TO THEM by AUDREY WILLIAMS JUNE David W. Szymanski wanted to work at a college where in local communities, and innovative teaching. The change the policies they create, and produce scholarship about professors to pursue work that matters to them without fear he could do what he does best: teach students how science can be used to solve real-world problems, help policy makers understand the link between science and teaching and learning. But he worried that the kind of work he does—much of it interdisciplinary and public-oriented—wouldn’t amount to much in the faculty-reward systems in place on many campuses. What often counts most in decisions about promotions, pay, and performance evaluations is having lots of highly cited research published in well-known, peer-reviewed journals, and being able to win large amounts of grant money. But a growing number of institutions are adopting more inclusive reward systems for faculty, with increased recognition for non-traditional kinds of research, service reflects shifts in scholarship and research in a world of rapidly changing technology, in which new forms of digital work are emerging. The new systems are also creating avenues for that they will derail otherwise promising careers. Mr. Szymanski, a geologist and forensic scientist, started working at Bentley University in 2009 as an assistant professor of natural and environmental sciences. Bentley, in Waltham, Mass., is one institution that is broadening the scope of faculty work that it recognizes and rewards, not least in decisions about salary increases and bonuses. He has received a merit-based raise to reward his successes, particularly his creation of a popular undergraduate course that gives students hands-on experience in how science and scientific data relates to federal environmental policies. Students in the course go to Washington to share their research with policy makers. 8 CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 10 9/20/13 11:29 AM
  • 11. The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013 “I came to Bentley because I knew that I could do this kind of work here,” says Mr. Szymanski, who won the university’s top teaching award for 2011 in recognition of the course. He was also an author of a peer-reviewed journal article, published last year, about how to use public-sector research projects to engage undergraduates. “Publishing in journals isn’t going away, but ... we also reward people for the work that matters to them.” Professors like Mr. Szymanski are among the kinds of people the business-oriented university is interested in considering for new bonuses, says Daniel L. Everett, dean of arts and sciences. Bentley will decide in mid- April which several dozen professors will receive onetime awards of about $5,000. Department chairs will recommend candidates, and the decisions will be made by the provost. One goal is to include professors whose work is beneficial to Bentley but may fall under the radar of the traditional faculty-reward structure. “People often think, ‘You’re only going to reward me if I do research,’” Mr. Everett says. “Publishing in journals isn’t going away, but we’re not overlooking everything else. We want to make sure that we also reward people for the work that matters to them.” That kind of recognition can go a long way in an environment where salary increases have barely kept pace with inflation in recent years. A new report on the economic state of higher education, released this week by the American Association of University Professors, found that, on average, pay for faculty members rose only 1.7 percent this academic year. The increase matches inflation, but only because inflation is so low. UNDERVALUED SCHOLARSHIP Other institutions, too, have taken steps to embrace nontraditional forms of scholarship. Michigan State, Portland State, and Syracuse Universities are among those that have changed their tenure-and-promotion policies to recognize public scholarship as much as more-traditional activities like writing books and publishing in scholarly journals. James S. Fairweather, a professor of higher, adult, and lifelong education at Michigan State who studies faculty roles and rewards, says conversations about how to best document and reward the full scope of faculty work have gained traction. He expects that to trigger “some support for broader concepts of faculty contributions.” KerryAnn O’Meara, an associate professor of higher education at the University of Maryland at College Park, agrees. There are routine tasks, she says, that faculty do that “don’t show up on their CV and don’t show up in annual reports of their time.” Among those, she says, are mentoring graduate students, directing institutional programs, writing letters of recommendation, and marketing programs to attract new students. Also often undervalued is scholarship in which professors use their expertise to explore issues in their communities. There are more people involved in community engagement than ever before, Ms. O’Meara says. Yet the path for career advancement for such scholars is still largely unpredictable. Mary C. Hutchinson became involved in communityengaged scholarship while teaching writing at 9 CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 11 9/20/13 11:29 AM
  • 12. The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013 Pennsylvania State University at Lehigh Valley. She pursued her interest in ways teachers could better support English-as-a-second-language learners enrolled in the public-school system. “Because I wasn’t in a tenure-track position, I was free to do what I wanted,” says Ms. Hutchinson, who once worked as an administrator and then as a lecturer in English for seven years. She earned a doctorate in education and with the degree was hired as an assistant professor of ESL education at Penn State. Then she scholarship on her campus—and throughout higher education, while the Faculty Senate at Syracuse voted to make changes to the university’s tenure and promotion policies so that assessing public scholarship in its many forms would be possible. Overhauling the faculty-reward system won’t work without a broad shift in the attitudes of professors, especially the ones who determine whether the scholarship of their peers measures up. Simply adding metrics or categories of work to evaluate as part of began to face pressure from senior administrators and faculty-reward systems won’t work, says Michigan State’s “I wanted to just go ahead with what I was doing,” says “Unless administrators are willing to have conversations colleagues, on and off the campus, she says, to acquire a solid publication record that reflected what she was doing in the community. Ms. Hutchinson, who also does research on service learning. “It only took the second-year review to see that wasn’t going to cut it.” So she “did double the work,” she recalls, both to continue the research that mattered most to her and to make sure she was getting articles published to bolster her case for tenure, which she earned last year. What can help public scholarship become more important to academics’ careers? A critical mass of professors involved in such work, or of high-profile scholars who have made a commitment to it, Ms. O’Meara says. “I’ve also seen that the larger the campus, the more important it is that people are on board at every level,” she says. “You need to have a provost or a president advocating for it, but you also need the faculty on a campus saying, This is something that we really want to do.” At Syracuse University, for instance, the institution’s chancellor, Nancy Cantor, is a vocal supporter of public Mr. Fairweather, unless colleges make more of an effort to try to encourage people to “think about what really matters—and that’s a different kind of conversation.” with people who are on promotion-and-tenure committees, nothing changes,” he says. “What matters is what those people value. At some point, institutions are going to have to confront that.” Mary T. Huber, a consulting scholar at the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, says she’s confident that new forms of scholarship will get the standing they deserve. “There is a growing cadre of people who have done scholarship in these new areas, and they will be the ones to educate others about it and serve as peer reviewers,” Ms. Huber says. “If the work that’s being done is actually meritorious, expands the imagination, expands knowledge, and improves practice, I believe it’s going to win out in the end.” At Bentley, Mr. Szymanski is hopeful that his work will mean success when he goes up for tenure. “They’ve already said the kind of work I do is valued,” he says, “so that’s why I keep doing it.” 10 CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 12 9/20/13 11:29 AM
  • 13. The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013 FOR FULL-TIME INSTRUCTORS, WORK OFF THE TENURE TRACK BECOMES ITS OWN CAREER by ROBIN WILSON When Denise K. Comer snagged a prestigious postdoctoral position at Duke University shortly after finishing her Ph.D. in English, she was sure the position would set her up for a tenure-track job down the line. Thirteen years later, Ms. Comer is still at Duke, working full time but off the tenure track, as director of the university’s first-year writing program. “I thought I’d launch myself into a tenure-stream position, but that changed,” she says. Her goals shifted as she had three children, and as the job at Duke— which she originally saw as a natural steppingstone to the tenure track—provided unexpected opportunities that she came to enjoy. A new report on the economic status of the professoriate shows that Ms. Comer’s story is typical among the 284,000 people who teach full-time off the tenure track. While such instructors may have envisioned eventually landing jobs within academe’s tenured ranks, many have instead spent their careers working in full-time contract positions with lower pay and less job security than tenured professors enjoy. The possibility that these full-timers will ever be considered for tenure-track jobs is slim, the report shows. The report, released April 8 by the American Association of University Professors, includes some of the most extensive data yet on the salaries and working conditions of non-tenure-track instructors, who account for nearly 40 percent of the full-time academic work force. The data come from a survey of 7,500 such instructors by the Coalition on the Academic Workforce, a group of highereducation and scholarly-discipline associations. John W. Curtis, director of research and public policy at the AAUP and an author of the report, said the survey 11 CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 13 9/20/13 11:29 AM
  • 14. The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013 “appears to be the largest to date focusing on contingent “This job is not transparent from the very beginning,” better working conditions than do part-time adjuncts. steppingstone, when it’s not.” academics.” Full-time contingent faculty members certainly enjoy Full-timers typically work on one-year to three-year contracts, says the AAUP report, and most are paid an annual salary, which averaged about $47,500 a year in 2010, the year the survey was conducted. But, for many, a job they considered temporary has become a career. Nearly 40 percent of the full-time instructors surveyed by the coalition said they had been teaching off the tenure track for at least a decade, and most who hold such positions are pushing middle age: 80 percent are 36 or older. Their pay is much better than that of part-time adjuncts, who the AAUP report says earn an average of $2,700 per course, but they still earn substantially less than tenure-rank faculty members, who made an average of $84,332 in 2010. NOT A STEPPINGSTONE Ms. Comer isn’t certain anymore whether landing a tenure-track post is her goal. She loves her job and even turned down a tenure-track offer from another university because the position wasn’t a match for the one she has at Duke. “I’d built such a network at Duke of people, resources, and opportunities it would take two or more years somewhere else to get that going again,” she says. Even if Ms. Comer does decide she wants to pursue a tenure-track job at Duke, though, the coalition’s survey seems to show that achieving it wouldn’t be easy. Just 3 percent of those surveyed said they were given priority consideration on their campuses when tenure-track jobs came open. says Maria C. Maisto, president of the New Faculty Majority, a national group that represents contingent faculty members. “People are often told this is a Don Eron has taught writing and rhetoric full time at the University of Colorado at Boulder for 20 years. He says he earns about $50,000 a year, has excellent health benefits, and is building a retirement fund. But he wishes he had tenure. It would give him greater job security and the freedom to say unpopular things. “After a while you want to contribute your expertise and knowledge about pedagogy to your program,” he says. “But if your point of view differs from the director, you are discouraged from doing so.” “At your own institution, they already have your intellectual capital, so it doesn’t add anything for them to promote you.” Mr. Eron, though, doesn’t expect to ever get tenure at Boulder, or anywhere else. “If you are applying for jobs at your own institution, they already have your intellectual capital, so it doesn’t add anything for them to promote you,” he says. And full-time instructors who apply for tenure-track jobs elsewhere often carry a stigma: “If you haven’t been able to get tenure where you are, they wonder, how good can you be? You are wearing that scarlet letter.” 12 CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 14 9/20/13 11:29 AM
  • 15. The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013 The AAUP report does show that not all full-time instructors working off the tenure track are qualified for Mr. Eron, 59, has an M.F.A., which is considered a terminal degree for teaching creative writing but not tenure-track jobs. While just over half of those for tenure-track professors in his field, rhetoric master’s in business administration. instructor will end how it began: without tenure. surveyed said they held doctorates, 28 percent had only a master’s degree. That figure does not include people with terminal degrees, like a master’s of fine arts or a and composition. He is getting ready to retire, and his career as a college Limits on Pay and Support for Full-Time Faculty Off the Tenure Track With fixed-term appointments and limited support from their colleges, full-time faculty who work off the tenure track— a growing proportion of the professoriate—effectively constitute a “second tier of the academic labor structure,” the American Association of University Professors says in this year’s report on the economic status of faculty. Median salaries for full-time faculty who are off the tenure track Median salaries for full-time faculty who are off the tenure track Median salaries for full-time faculty who are off the tenure track Median salaries for full-time faculty who are off the tenure track $47,500 $47,500 $47,500 $47,500 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $51,000 $51,000 $51,000 $51,000 All Private, nonMedian salaries for full-time faculty Public off the tenure track who are All Public Private, noncolleges All colleges $47,500 All colleges colleges $45,000 colleges Public colleges $51,000 Public colleges colleges profit colleges Private, nonprofit colleges $50,000 Private, nonprofit colleges profit colleges $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 Private, forPrivate, forprofit colleges Private, forprofit colleges Private, forprofit colleges profit colleges % of full-time faculty off the tenure track who report having access to % of full-time faculty off the tenure track who report having access to various types of institutional support and who report having access to % of full-time of Public off the tenure trackPrivate, forAll Private, nonvarious types faculty off the tenure track who report having access to institutional support and activities activities % colleges of full-time faculty colleges profit colleges profit colleges various types of institutional support and activities various types of institutional support and activities Participation in departmental meetings Participation in departmental meetings Participation in departmental meetings % of full-time faculty off the tenure track who report having access to Participation in departmental meetings various types of institutional support and activities Support for travel to professional meetings Support for travel to professional meetings Participation in departmental meetings Support for travel to professional meetings 52.9% 77.6% 52.9% Support for travel to professional meetings Support for travel to professional meetings 52.9% Ability to submit research grants with institutional support 52.9% Ability to submit research grants with institutional support 52.9% 41.1% Ability to submit research grants with institutional support Ability to submit researchresearch grants with institutional support 41.1% Ability to submit grants with institutional support 41.1% 41.1% Priority consideration for tenure-track openings 41.1% Priority consideration for tenure-track openings Priority consideration for tenure-track openings 3.1% Priority consideration for tenure-track openings 3.1% 3.1% Priority consideration for tenure-track openings 3.1% Note: Data are for fall 2010, the most recent available. Note:3.1% are for fall 2010, the most recent available. Data 77.6% 77.6% 77.6% 77.6% Note: Data are for fall 2010, the most recent available. Note: Data are for fall 2010, the most recent available. Note: Data are for fall 2010, the most recent available. SOURCE: American Association of University Professors’ analysis of the survey of contingent faculty members and instructors, Fall 2010, by Coalition on the Academic Workforce 13 CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 15 9/20/13 11:29 AM
  • 16. The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013 Average Salaries of Full-Time Faculty Members, 2012-13 All Institutions Public Salary 1-year change Men’s salary Women’s salary Women’s salary as a percentage of men’s $134,747 2.6% $137,908 $124,511 90.3% Professor Associate professor $88,306 2.1% $90,945 $84,377 92.8% Assistant professor $76,822 2.6% $80,260 $72,973 Instructor $51,116 2.4% $52,732 Lecturer $57,225 — No rank $68,153 All Salary 1-year change $123,393 2.1% Professor Associate professor $84,275 1.9% Associate profe 90.9% Assistant professor $73,212 2.6% Assistant profe $50,008 94.8% Instructor $48,359 2.4% Instructor $61,034 $54,112 88.7% Lecturer $54,382 — Lecturer — $73,345 $63,377 86.4% No rank $55,905 — No rank $96,686 2.0% $105,584 $82,522 78.2% All $89,657 1.7% Professor $92,522 1.0% $94,333 $89,076 94.4% Professor $88,988 0.6% Professor Associate professor $73,103 1.2% $74,566 $71,351 95.7% Associate professor $71,343 1.0% Associate profe Assistant professor $62,184 1.6% $63,495 $61,052 96.2% Assistant professor $61,041 1.3% Assistant profe Instructor $47,098 2.3% $47,916 $46,623 97.3% Instructor $45,258 2.0% Instructor Lecturer $49,626 — $51,135 $48,506 94.9% Lecturer $48,086 — Lecturer No rank $55,624 — $58,604 $52,962 90.4% No rank $51,506 — No rank All $71,620 1.1% $75,843 $66,819 88.1% All $69,149 0.8% Professor $91,935 1.9% $83,161 $89,602 107.7% Professor $86,427 1.1% Professor Associate professor $70,334 1.7% $71,264 $69,232 97.1% Associate professor $70,066 1.2% Associate profe Assistant professor $58,406 2.0% $59,053 $57,819 97.9% Assistant professor $58,591 1.5% Assistant profe Instructor $47,915 2.9% $48,331 $47,666 98.6% Instructor $48,798 3.5% Instructor Lecturer $52,116 — $54,001 $50,701 93.9% Lecturer $49,064 — Lecturer No rank $58,028 — $61,598 $54,277 88.1% No rank $45,904 — No rank All $70,774 1.9% $74,086 $66,882 90.3% All $66,298 1.2% Doctoral institutions Professor Doctoral institutions Master’s institutions Doctoral inst Master’s institutions Baccalaureate institutions Master’s inst Baccalaureate institutions Two-year institutions with academic ranks All All Baccalaureat All Two-year institutions with academic ranks Two-year ins Professor $74,526 –0.7% $75,076 $73,930 98.5% Professor $74,845 –0.7% Professor Associate professor $60,821 –0.8% $61,799 $59,985 97.1% Associate professor $60,876 –0.8% Associate profe Assistant professor $52,643 –1.0% $52,985 $52,365 98.8% Assistant professor $52,754 –1.0% Assistant profe Instructor $45,244 –1.6% $45,484 $45,052 99.1% Instructor $45,314 –1.7% Instructor Lecturer $45,824 — $45,953 $45,747 99.6% Lecturer $45,819 — Lecturer No rank $40,226 — $39,502 $40,668 103.0% No rank $41,685 — No rank All $58,884 –1.0% $60,145 $57,774 96.1% All $59,002 –1.1% 1.1% $63,046 $62,075 98.5% $116,419 2.1% $120,797 $105,402 87.3% Professor Associate professor $80,116 1.7% $82,628 $76,797 92.9% Assistant professor $68,025 2.1% $70,781 $65,321 Instructor $48,725 2.0% $49,802 Lecturer $54,475 — No rank $64,343 All $84,303 Two-year institutions without academic ranks All $62,523 Two-year institutions without academic ranks All institutions with academic ranks Professor All Two-year ins All All $62,776 1.0% All institutions with academic ranks All institution $110,143 1.6% Professor Associate professor $78,529 1.5% Associate profe 92.3% Assistant professor $67,097 2.0% Assistant profe $48,024 96.4% Instructor $46,926 1.7% Instructor $57,563 $52,045 90.4% Lecturer $51,965 — Lecturer — $68,880 $60,141 87.3% No rank $54,005 — No rank 1.7% $91,994 $73,932 80.4% All $80,578 1.3% All 14 CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 16 9/20/13 11:29 AM
  • 17. The Chronicle of Higher Education • April 12, 2013 Average Salaries of Full-Time Faculty Members, 2012-13 Private, Independent Religious Salary ar ge 1-year change Doctoral institutions Salary 1-year change Doctoral institutions % Professor $167,118 3.4% Professor $139,194 2.6% % Associate professor $104,016 2.4% Associate professor $94,199 2.7% % Assistant professor $90,622 2.1% Assistant professor $79,849 2.1% % Instructor $63,269 3.7% Instructor $63,830 0.4% — Lecturer $66,519 — Lecturer $58,942 — — No rank $77,561 — No rank $73,557 — % All $120,701 2.6% $100,093 2.2% $104,186 1.6% Master’s institutions All Master’s institutions % Professor Professor $94,031 2.1% % Associate professor $78,125 1.6% Associate professor $73,114 1.4% % Assistant professor $66,050 1.9% Assistant professor $61,487 2.2% % Instructor $52,899 3.4% Instructor $51,987 3.1% — Lecturer $58,312 — Lecturer $52,966 — — No rank $66,503 — No rank $62,292 — % All $79,438 1.7% All $72,529 1.9% $104,335 2.2% Baccalaureate institutions Baccalaureate institutions % Professor Professor $78,629 1.8% % Associate professor $76,993 2.1% Associate professor $63,244 1.3% % Assistant professor $62,763 2.2% Assistant professor $53,901 2.1% % Instructor $49,990 2.4% Instructor $45,802 2.4% — Lecturer $60,939 — Lecturer $43,831 — — No rank $63,581 — No rank $50,134 — % All $80,109 2.2% All $63,092 1.9% Two-year institutions with academic ranks Two-year institutions with academic ranks % Professor — — Professor — — % Associate professor — — Associate professor — — % Assistant professor — — Assistant professor — — % Instructor — — Instructor — — — Lecturer — — Lecturer — — — No rank — — No rank — — % All — — All — — % Two-year institutions without academic ranks All — Two-year institutions without academic ranks — All institutions with academic ranks All — — All institutions with academic ranks $139,620 3.0% Professor $100,351 2.4% NOTE: Associate professor $88,301 2.0% Associate professor $74,602 1.6% % Assistant professor $74,664 2.3% Assistant professor $61,881 2.3% 2.9% Dollar figures are based on data from 1,142 institutions; percentage changes are based on data from 1,095 institutions that reported comparable data for both years. As a result, the percentage changes refer to a slightly different set of dollar figures than those shown. Percentages are not adjusted for inflation. Dollar figures do not reflect all pay reductions caused by unpaid furloughs attributed to the recession. The figures cover full-time members of the instructional staff, except those in medical schools. The salaries are adjusted to a standard ninemonth work year. A dash indicates that no data were reported. % Professor % % Instructor $56,530 3.3% Instructor $51,950 — Lecturer $64,480 — Lecturer $53,751 — — No rank $74,042 — No rank $67,657 — % All $99,771 2.4% All $75,857 2.1% SOURCE: American Association of University Professors 15 CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 17 9/20/13 11:29 AM
  • 18. ulty Profile Salaries Over Time For a complete view into the AAUP Salary Survey data, including a look at how faculty salaries have changed over time, go to Chronicle.com/salarysurvey CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 18 9/20/13 11:29 AM
  • 19. FREE WITH EVERY EMPLOYEE PLAN: CONFIDENCE. According to survey results, employees in TIAA-CREF plans are five times more confident about retirement than the average American worker.1 That’s what happens when they get expert advice and Lipper Award-winning funds. Confidence, it’s another way we deliver Outcomes That Matter for your employees. Award-winning funds to get employees to and through retirement. Get started at tiaa-cref.org/5times. BEST OVERALL LARGE FUND COMPANY2 As compared to the average American worker. TIAA-CREF participant survey (n=2,376), advice = April through September 2011 and 2011 Retirement Confidence Survey Results by EBRI (Mar ’11). 2 In calculating the awards, Lipper considered funds registered for sale in the United States with at least 36 months of performance as of the end of the calendar year of the respective evaluation year. Fund groups with at least five equity, five bond or three mixed-asset portfolios were eligible for an overall group award. The award is given to the group with the lowest average decile ranking of three years’ Consistent Return measure of the eligible funds over the three-year period ended 11/30/12. TIAA-CREF was ranked against 36 fund companies. Investment, insurance and annuity products are not FDIC insured, are not bank guaranteed, are not deposits, are not insured by any federal government agency, are not a condition to any banking service or activity, and may lose value. TIAA-CREF Individual & Institutional Services, LLC and Teachers Personal Investors Services, Inc., members FINRA, distribute securities products. ©2013 Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association-College Retirement Equities Fund (TIAA-CREF), 730 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017. C11891 TIAA-CREF products may be subject to market and other risk factors. See the applicable product literature, or visit tiaa-cref.org for details. Past performance does not guarantee future results. The Lipper Award is based on a review of 36 companies’ 2012 risk-adjusted performance. Consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses carefully before investing. Visit tiaa-cref.org for product and fund prospectuses that contain this and other information. Read carefully before investing. 1 CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 19 9/20/13 11:29 AM
  • 20. Sponsored by: 1255 Twenty-Third Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037 (202) 466-1000 | Chronicle.com Copyright © 2013 CHECOR1246_Salary Survey RePrint v5.indd 20 9/20/13 11:29 AM