SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 4
Baixar para ler offline
https://yorksandhumber.ewin.nhs.uk/home
Good practice
case study Yorkshire and the Humber
Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Increasing Training and
Appraisal Compliance
summary
The aim of this project was to significantly
increase mandatory training and appraisal
compliance at Barnsley Hospital NHS
Foundation Trust in order to ensure the
Trust have a safe, competent and valued
workforce.
Continued significant low compliance
reported to the Trust Board led to the
heightened focus on staff training and
appraisals.
KEY OUTCOMES
Overall training compliance for mandatory
subjects increased from 45% in April 2011
to 84% in March 2012. This included an
overall compliance rate of 91% for both
safeguarding adults and children’s training,
(clinical and non-clinical compliance
combined), which was part of the Trust’s
Commissioning for Quality and Innovation
(CQUIN) target. The presentation slide pack
that supports this case study provides a
breakdown review of compliance
undertaken.
The initial target set for training was 90%
compliance. The Trust will continue to strive
to achieve a compliance rate beyond this
target; however, as at April 2012 the
compliance rate had already increased to
86%. Prior to this, appraisal compliance
increased from 58% in April 2011 to 88%
in March 2012.
Increased compliance provides evidence that
the Trust’s workforce is safe, competent
and valued. If we had not embarked on
this project, the training and appraisal
compliance would have continued to remain
below acceptable standards or could even
have worsened. This would have resulted
in an increased risk to patients and staff
because staff would not have been
appropriately trained to a high standard,
with the most relevant information.
key aims
Achieve 80% appraisal compliance by
31st March 2012.
Obtain 90% mandatory and statutory
training compliance by 31st March 2012.
Attain the benefits associated with a fully
trained and appraised workforce. It is
important that staff receive training as this
demonstrates that the Trust is developing
its staff. Mandatory training ensures that
staff have the skills necessary to recognise
potential problems and to deal with them
by contacting the right people. It also helps
to improve patient care and the outcome
of their stay within hospital by covering
communication and recognition of issues
relating to safeguarding patients. Other
training equips staff to do their job better
and to ensure that the care given to patients
is streamlined and to a high standard. It
reassures patients that the people looking
after them are trained to the highest standards
in line with best practice.
Evidence of the project’s success is already
showing in the Trust’s staff survey results;
this year’s staff survey is expected to
improve further because of this work.
Towards the end of 2011, the Trust received
a high grade B in an internal audit of
appraisals (a grade B indicates significant
assurance for the organisation with only
minor adjustments needed; these were
undertaken immediately). The Audit also
stated that the Trust was quite a distance
ahead of other Trusts in this area.
The Trust is independently regulated by
MONITOR, and assessed by the Care Quality
Commission (CQC) and the NHS Litigation
Authority (NHSLA). Failure to appraise
employees and provide essential training
could have serious ramifications for the
Trust, especially if employees are not fit to
practise, which could cause serious harm to
patients and/or the organisation.
The overall results achieved during 2011/12
should help the Trust to evidence to regulators/
assessors that as an organisation we are
effectively managing risk, directly improving
the quality of our workforce and ultimately
our services where needed.
https://yorksandhumber.ewin.nhs.uk/home
Good practice
case study Yorkshire and the Humber
key stages
•	 Competency requirements were set up
on all positions in ESR in order to clarify
the specific training requirements for
each post. This was carried out prior to
April 2011.
•	 Increased roll out of eLearning packages.
•	 Review of all training requirements,
frequencies and packages to ensure the
right staff, get the right training at the
right time. This included tailoring
packages to non-clinical staff, reviewing the
frequency of training needed, using
alternative media such as leaflets,
eLearning and classroom packages.
•	 The workforce information SharePoint
site was further developed to include
new reports and traffic light reports to
highlight poor performing areas to
managers. The site provides monthly
reports for appraisal and mandatory
and statutory training compliance by
employee and department. The purpose
of these reports is to make it easier for
managers to monitor compliance levels
and target employees who are out of
date.
•	 The project took place over a 12-month
period April 2011 – March 2012.
Information was routinely reviewed.
The managers of any areas not showing
increases above 50% (June 2011) and
then 70% (January 2012) received a
	 letter from the Chief Executive and any
areas performing within these thresholds,
within target were sent a more ‘gentle’
letter from the Human Resources (HR)
Director.
•	 In July 2011 a simplified appraisal
process for Agenda for Change
employees was rolled out which made
the Knowledge and Skills Framework
(KSF) appraisal easier to complete,
although not less time consuming, as
a qualitative appraisal is still deemed
imperative.
•	 Where appraisals for staff had never
taken place, the employee and line
manager were contacted directly via
email and asked to carry out an
appraisal as a priority.
•	 A new induction programme was
introduced to ensure all new starters
received all priority 1 mandatory training
within their first two weeks at the Trust.
•	 Additional classroom training was
provided at quieter times such as bank
holidays and over the Christmas period.
•	 Training was provided to teams in their
department, at key meetings or at
handover times.
•	 A new letter (training statement) was
created and sent to individual employees
which provided individuals’ with the
status of their mandatory and statutory
training and appraisal; they also showed
the date they were next required to
complete each subject. Individual training
statement’s will continue to be sent to
staff every 6 months to enable them to
see their own progress and allow them
to plan to ensure they maintain their
compliance.
•	 Computer rooms and support for
eLearning were made available within
the Education Centre.
•	 Home working policy was encouraged
for eLearning.
•	 Meetings were held with the managers
of low compliance areas to provide help
and support on how to address the issues.
background
Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust is among the leading NHS Trusts in
the country, employing almost 3000 staff. The 425-bed hospital was built in
the 1970’s. It serves a population of over a quarter of a million people in the
Barnsley area. The Trust is renowned not only for top performance but also
for its friendly culture, first-rate environment and convenient location.
Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust has been at the forefront of several
Electronic Staff Record (ESR) developments and has successfully implemented
the ESR National Learning Management System (NLMS) eLearning as a fully
Smartcard enabled application.
Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust was recently runner up in the
category of ‘best practice and innovation using ESR’ at the Healthcare People
Management (HPMA) Excellence in HRM Awards 2011. The judges’ verdict
was that Barnsley has ‘pushed the boundaries of ESR further with their
exemplar deployment of the system for eLearning and access to clinical systems’.
https://yorksandhumber.ewin.nhs.uk/home
Good practice
case study Yorkshire and the Humber
how it works
•	 Support from the Trust Board is vital to
push the importance of compliance and
as such, the topic was on the Board’s
monthly agenda, which presented the
monthly overall status for the Trust and
the performance of individual divisions.
•	 Divisions monitored the performance
of their teams/departments at monthly
performance meetings.
•	 Direct letters from the Chief Executive
were sent to the managers of the poorest
performing areas. Mid range, areas
were sent letters from the HR Director.
•	 New reports were introduced for
managers to enable them to continually
monitor their staff training and appraisals
more easily (see supporting presentation
slide pack).
•	 Simplified information with regard to
what courses staff needed to carry out,
how to complete them and who to
contact, were published on SharePoint,
intranet pages and via links in a weekly
bulletin.
WHO WAS INVOLVED?
There was significant leadership and support
from the Trust Board.
The Learning and Development, Informatics,
KSF, HR Projects and Training Leads were the
key groups involved in promoting, running
and supporting this project.
All staff and managers were included in
the project, including medical staff. Direct
targeting and meetings with clinical areas
were available. Board support and
performance meetings ensured it was
high on the agenda of all areas.
resources
The project was both resource intensive and
time consuming for the key groups who
worked well across teams to achieve in-
creases in compliance. This was particularly
evident in the early months of the project
when staff either had queries on the new
information provided or had completed the
wrong eLearning course, which needed to
be further explained.
Increased capacity was required from the
practical training leads that provided locally
delivered training within departments.
Simplified documents, guidance and
information were sent direct to individuals
and managers. Previously, reports were
provided to show compliance for individual
subjects as opposed to being tools that
enabled managers to manage training and
appraisal compliance.
Entering competency requirements onto all
positions in ESR meant we could identify
and provide staff with details of exactly
what training was required for their role.
Previously statements such as ‘all clinical
staff’ were used to define requirements.
key challenges
The main challenge faced was being able
to release staff to complete training and
appraisals. Several methods were used to
address this:
•	 Ensuring all training is relevant and of
appropriate duration minimises the time
staff spend away from their workplace.
•	 Provide eLearning training that can be
completed at any time. For example
night staff, have completed packages
during quiet times on wards.
•	 Home access to eLearning has enabled
staff to complete training in a timely
manner and claim the time back at a
later date. This has been particularly
useful for Nurse Bank Staff.
•	 Ensure all new starters complete the
Trust induction programme within
their first 2 weeks so that they are
not required to be released from the
workplace later.
•	 Provide additional classroom sessions at
quiet times.
•	 Training was provided to teams/
departments at handover or in meetings.
•	 Training course bookings were monitored;
where attendance was low, managers
were contacted directly to notify them of
available spaces.
Staff completing incorrect eLearning
packages was a definite issue. As there are
a wealth of courses available staff would
often select the incorrect course, for
example, selecting Health and Safety
training rather than Fire Safety training. As
a result, improved simplified documentation
was provided and reports have now been
set up to monitor this to enable staff to be
contacted if they enrol on the wrong course.
This has resulted in a reduction in the
number of incorrect enrolments each
month.
Bank Nurse staff was a significant group
that had low training compliance; these
staff were notified by letter that compliance
must be achieved to allow them to work any
future shifts. This group of staff increased
its training compliance from 29% to 70%
over the 12-month period.
https://yorksandhumber.ewin.nhs.uk/home
Good practice
case study Yorkshire and the Humber
key learning
Board support was vital to the success of
the project.
Team working across the key departments
and with training leads was also fundamental
to the overall success.
Simplifying documentation, reports, and
entering competency requirements
significantly helped staff understand
what was required and when.
Engagement with managers and commu-
nication was crucial. Direct letters from the
Chief Executive to poorer performing areas
had a positive impact.
The provision of classroom training at times
that suit staff, not the training team, is
important to ensure attendance e.g. during
the Christmas period or on bank holidays.
SUSTAINABILITY
The reports and monitoring will continue
this year and the plan is to build on the
success already achieved. Key documents
and guidance will continue to be maintained
and individual training statements will
continue to be sent to staff every 6 months.
The Trust needs to manage compliance
going forward as some peaks for subjects
in specific months, when large amounts
of staff will no longer be compliant, have
been identified. Plans are being put in place
to work with training leads and managers
in order to help plan for this to avoid any
dramatic drops in compliance.
NEXT STEPS
Further work needs to be carried out to
improve the compliance of some specific
practical subjects.
The Trust is in the process of drawing up
an action plan for the next 12months to
maintain and improve on the compliance
rates already achieved. An assessment of
the quality outcomes will be included in the
action plan.
In April 2012, the Trust introduced improved
management reports for priority 2 training
courses (policy specific training). These
will hopefully have the same impact as the
priority 1 training reports and improve the
overall compliance for these subjects.
The Trust expects to meet the 90% targets
(as a minimum) for both training and
appraisals by March 2013.
supporting material
Breakdown of compliance presentation
slide pack.
further links
NHS Employers Simplified
KSF Case Study
http://www.nhsemployers.org/
SharedLearning/Pages/SimplifiedKSFat-
BarnsleyHospitalNHSFT.aspx
CONTACT FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION
•	 Kim Reynolds
Workforce Information Officer  
Email: Kim.Reynolds@nhs.net
Telephone: 01226 433 931
©NHSNorthWest

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

AS Resume - detailed
AS Resume - detailedAS Resume - detailed
AS Resume - detailedAmanda Smith
 
professional resume
professional resumeprofessional resume
professional resumeBeverly Fick
 
BHS Considerations for Improving Charge Capture Processes_Chloe Phillips
BHS Considerations for Improving Charge Capture Processes_Chloe PhillipsBHS Considerations for Improving Charge Capture Processes_Chloe Phillips
BHS Considerations for Improving Charge Capture Processes_Chloe PhillipsChloe Phillips, MHA, RHIA
 
Revalidation March 2010
Revalidation March 2010Revalidation March 2010
Revalidation March 2010junojesu
 
LA Annual Report 2014-15 final 14Oct15
LA Annual Report 2014-15 final 14Oct15LA Annual Report 2014-15 final 14Oct15
LA Annual Report 2014-15 final 14Oct15Claire Lodge
 
Revalidation - Dr Sandra Flynn
Revalidation - Dr Sandra FlynnRevalidation - Dr Sandra Flynn
Revalidation - Dr Sandra FlynnRCN SOTN
 
Disability Hiring Managing Federal Changes
Disability Hiring Managing Federal ChangesDisability Hiring Managing Federal Changes
Disability Hiring Managing Federal Changesderekshields
 
Consultancy Management Assignment - Hanish
Consultancy Management Assignment - HanishConsultancy Management Assignment - Hanish
Consultancy Management Assignment - HanishHANISH SHAN S
 
WEBINAR: Performance Improvement for Children’s Hospitals – Key Steps in Deve...
WEBINAR: Performance Improvement for Children’s Hospitals – Key Steps in Deve...WEBINAR: Performance Improvement for Children’s Hospitals – Key Steps in Deve...
WEBINAR: Performance Improvement for Children’s Hospitals – Key Steps in Deve...Huron Consulting Group
 
NMC WirralCT revalidation presentation - Jan 2016
NMC WirralCT revalidation presentation - Jan 2016NMC WirralCT revalidation presentation - Jan 2016
NMC WirralCT revalidation presentation - Jan 2016WirralCT
 
Carolyn Middleton Senior Nurse
Carolyn Middleton Senior NurseCarolyn Middleton Senior Nurse
Carolyn Middleton Senior Nurse3GDR
 
Developing a Hospital Level Strategy
Developing a Hospital Level StrategyDeveloping a Hospital Level Strategy
Developing a Hospital Level StrategyProfessor Adam Cairns
 
Looking back to move forward - Train the Trainer Study Day for NIVAS
Looking back to move forward - Train the Trainer Study Day for NIVASLooking back to move forward - Train the Trainer Study Day for NIVAS
Looking back to move forward - Train the Trainer Study Day for NIVASSarah Phillips
 
Training and Up-skilling the Workforce to Deliver Effective 7-Day Services
Training and Up-skilling the Workforce to Deliver Effective 7-Day ServicesTraining and Up-skilling the Workforce to Deliver Effective 7-Day Services
Training and Up-skilling the Workforce to Deliver Effective 7-Day ServicesNHS Improving Quality
 

Mais procurados (20)

AS Resume - detailed
AS Resume - detailedAS Resume - detailed
AS Resume - detailed
 
professional resume
professional resumeprofessional resume
professional resume
 
BHS Considerations for Improving Charge Capture Processes_Chloe Phillips
BHS Considerations for Improving Charge Capture Processes_Chloe PhillipsBHS Considerations for Improving Charge Capture Processes_Chloe Phillips
BHS Considerations for Improving Charge Capture Processes_Chloe Phillips
 
PRECYSE_Baptist_CaseStudy
PRECYSE_Baptist_CaseStudyPRECYSE_Baptist_CaseStudy
PRECYSE_Baptist_CaseStudy
 
Revalidation March 2010
Revalidation March 2010Revalidation March 2010
Revalidation March 2010
 
LA Annual Report 2014-15 final 14Oct15
LA Annual Report 2014-15 final 14Oct15LA Annual Report 2014-15 final 14Oct15
LA Annual Report 2014-15 final 14Oct15
 
AHIMA Journal_Foot in the Door_JAN15
AHIMA Journal_Foot in the Door_JAN15AHIMA Journal_Foot in the Door_JAN15
AHIMA Journal_Foot in the Door_JAN15
 
Critical Issues: Workforce Forum Presentation
Critical Issues: Workforce Forum PresentationCritical Issues: Workforce Forum Presentation
Critical Issues: Workforce Forum Presentation
 
Revalidation - Dr Sandra Flynn
Revalidation - Dr Sandra FlynnRevalidation - Dr Sandra Flynn
Revalidation - Dr Sandra Flynn
 
Resume Dec 2016
Resume Dec 2016Resume Dec 2016
Resume Dec 2016
 
Disability Hiring Managing Federal Changes
Disability Hiring Managing Federal ChangesDisability Hiring Managing Federal Changes
Disability Hiring Managing Federal Changes
 
Owensboro
OwensboroOwensboro
Owensboro
 
Request Info doc_072916
Request Info doc_072916Request Info doc_072916
Request Info doc_072916
 
Consultancy Management Assignment - Hanish
Consultancy Management Assignment - HanishConsultancy Management Assignment - Hanish
Consultancy Management Assignment - Hanish
 
WEBINAR: Performance Improvement for Children’s Hospitals – Key Steps in Deve...
WEBINAR: Performance Improvement for Children’s Hospitals – Key Steps in Deve...WEBINAR: Performance Improvement for Children’s Hospitals – Key Steps in Deve...
WEBINAR: Performance Improvement for Children’s Hospitals – Key Steps in Deve...
 
NMC WirralCT revalidation presentation - Jan 2016
NMC WirralCT revalidation presentation - Jan 2016NMC WirralCT revalidation presentation - Jan 2016
NMC WirralCT revalidation presentation - Jan 2016
 
Carolyn Middleton Senior Nurse
Carolyn Middleton Senior NurseCarolyn Middleton Senior Nurse
Carolyn Middleton Senior Nurse
 
Developing a Hospital Level Strategy
Developing a Hospital Level StrategyDeveloping a Hospital Level Strategy
Developing a Hospital Level Strategy
 
Looking back to move forward - Train the Trainer Study Day for NIVAS
Looking back to move forward - Train the Trainer Study Day for NIVASLooking back to move forward - Train the Trainer Study Day for NIVAS
Looking back to move forward - Train the Trainer Study Day for NIVAS
 
Training and Up-skilling the Workforce to Deliver Effective 7-Day Services
Training and Up-skilling the Workforce to Deliver Effective 7-Day ServicesTraining and Up-skilling the Workforce to Deliver Effective 7-Day Services
Training and Up-skilling the Workforce to Deliver Effective 7-Day Services
 

Semelhante a eWIN Case Study - Increasing Training and Appraisal Compliance (1)

eWIN Y&H CS Catalogue v3.3 11.12.14
eWIN Y&H CS Catalogue v3.3 11.12.14eWIN Y&H CS Catalogue v3.3 11.12.14
eWIN Y&H CS Catalogue v3.3 11.12.14Debbie Crouch
 
eWIN_Case_Study_-_A_Workforce_Strategy_to_Improve_Staff_Engagement[1]
eWIN_Case_Study_-_A_Workforce_Strategy_to_Improve_Staff_Engagement[1]eWIN_Case_Study_-_A_Workforce_Strategy_to_Improve_Staff_Engagement[1]
eWIN_Case_Study_-_A_Workforce_Strategy_to_Improve_Staff_Engagement[1]Sue Whittam
 
Reddington Hospital Group Learning and Development.
Reddington Hospital Group Learning and Development.Reddington Hospital Group Learning and Development.
Reddington Hospital Group Learning and Development.olumidejones30
 
1545 eilish mc auliffe nhc 28-5-15 emc
1545 eilish mc auliffe nhc   28-5-15 emc1545 eilish mc auliffe nhc   28-5-15 emc
1545 eilish mc auliffe nhc 28-5-15 emcinvestnethealthcare
 
171 muster2014 mc kay
171 muster2014 mc kay171 muster2014 mc kay
171 muster2014 mc kayMuster2014
 
Quality Report 2015-2016 PDF FINAL
Quality Report 2015-2016 PDF FINALQuality Report 2015-2016 PDF FINAL
Quality Report 2015-2016 PDF FINALOmer Kemal
 
in service education.pptxNature & scope of in-service education program , org...
in service education.pptxNature & scope of in-service education program , org...in service education.pptxNature & scope of in-service education program , org...
in service education.pptxNature & scope of in-service education program , org...NeharikaKumari5
 
STAFF DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAM.
STAFF DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAM.STAFF DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAM.
STAFF DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAM.RAJPAL YADAV
 
Ian Legg Nov14 CV(v4)
Ian Legg Nov14 CV(v4)Ian Legg Nov14 CV(v4)
Ian Legg Nov14 CV(v4)Ian Legg
 
Delivering Improvement Prospectus 2016
Delivering Improvement Prospectus 2016Delivering Improvement Prospectus 2016
Delivering Improvement Prospectus 2016Emma Carruthers
 
Final Action Research Report
Final Action Research ReportFinal Action Research Report
Final Action Research ReportS. Rose
 
Kimberly Nelson-Wright Resume
Kimberly Nelson-Wright ResumeKimberly Nelson-Wright Resume
Kimberly Nelson-Wright ResumeKymberly Nichole
 
staff Skill development.pptx
staff Skill development.pptxstaff Skill development.pptx
staff Skill development.pptxgambhirkhaddar1
 
Health Select Committee Inquiry into Education, Training and Workforce Planning
Health Select Committee Inquiry into Education, Training and Workforce PlanningHealth Select Committee Inquiry into Education, Training and Workforce Planning
Health Select Committee Inquiry into Education, Training and Workforce PlanningChartered Management Institute
 

Semelhante a eWIN Case Study - Increasing Training and Appraisal Compliance (1) (20)

eWIN Y&H CS Catalogue v3.3 11.12.14
eWIN Y&H CS Catalogue v3.3 11.12.14eWIN Y&H CS Catalogue v3.3 11.12.14
eWIN Y&H CS Catalogue v3.3 11.12.14
 
Training Needs Analysis Report
Training Needs Analysis ReportTraining Needs Analysis Report
Training Needs Analysis Report
 
eWIN_Case_Study_-_A_Workforce_Strategy_to_Improve_Staff_Engagement[1]
eWIN_Case_Study_-_A_Workforce_Strategy_to_Improve_Staff_Engagement[1]eWIN_Case_Study_-_A_Workforce_Strategy_to_Improve_Staff_Engagement[1]
eWIN_Case_Study_-_A_Workforce_Strategy_to_Improve_Staff_Engagement[1]
 
Reddington Hospital Group Learning and Development.
Reddington Hospital Group Learning and Development.Reddington Hospital Group Learning and Development.
Reddington Hospital Group Learning and Development.
 
1545 eilish mc auliffe nhc 28-5-15 emc
1545 eilish mc auliffe nhc   28-5-15 emc1545 eilish mc auliffe nhc   28-5-15 emc
1545 eilish mc auliffe nhc 28-5-15 emc
 
171 muster2014 mc kay
171 muster2014 mc kay171 muster2014 mc kay
171 muster2014 mc kay
 
Quality Report 2015-2016 PDF FINAL
Quality Report 2015-2016 PDF FINALQuality Report 2015-2016 PDF FINAL
Quality Report 2015-2016 PDF FINAL
 
in service education.pptxNature & scope of in-service education program , org...
in service education.pptxNature & scope of in-service education program , org...in service education.pptxNature & scope of in-service education program , org...
in service education.pptxNature & scope of in-service education program , org...
 
Health Select Committee Evidence Dec 2011
Health Select Committee Evidence Dec 2011 Health Select Committee Evidence Dec 2011
Health Select Committee Evidence Dec 2011
 
STAFF DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAM.
STAFF DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAM.STAFF DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAM.
STAFF DEVELOPMENTAL PROGRAM.
 
Ian Legg Nov14 CV(v4)
Ian Legg Nov14 CV(v4)Ian Legg Nov14 CV(v4)
Ian Legg Nov14 CV(v4)
 
Hee patrick mitchell
Hee   patrick mitchellHee   patrick mitchell
Hee patrick mitchell
 
Delivering Improvement Prospectus 2016
Delivering Improvement Prospectus 2016Delivering Improvement Prospectus 2016
Delivering Improvement Prospectus 2016
 
VBR-The-story-so-far
VBR-The-story-so-farVBR-The-story-so-far
VBR-The-story-so-far
 
Final Action Research Report
Final Action Research ReportFinal Action Research Report
Final Action Research Report
 
Kimberly Nelson-Wright Resume
Kimberly Nelson-Wright ResumeKimberly Nelson-Wright Resume
Kimberly Nelson-Wright Resume
 
In Service Education
In Service Education In Service Education
In Service Education
 
staff Skill development.pptx
staff Skill development.pptxstaff Skill development.pptx
staff Skill development.pptx
 
Health Select Committee Inquiry into Education, Training and Workforce Planning
Health Select Committee Inquiry into Education, Training and Workforce PlanningHealth Select Committee Inquiry into Education, Training and Workforce Planning
Health Select Committee Inquiry into Education, Training and Workforce Planning
 
David Whittam CV
David Whittam CVDavid Whittam CV
David Whittam CV
 

eWIN Case Study - Increasing Training and Appraisal Compliance (1)

  • 1. https://yorksandhumber.ewin.nhs.uk/home Good practice case study Yorkshire and the Humber Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Increasing Training and Appraisal Compliance summary The aim of this project was to significantly increase mandatory training and appraisal compliance at Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust in order to ensure the Trust have a safe, competent and valued workforce. Continued significant low compliance reported to the Trust Board led to the heightened focus on staff training and appraisals. KEY OUTCOMES Overall training compliance for mandatory subjects increased from 45% in April 2011 to 84% in March 2012. This included an overall compliance rate of 91% for both safeguarding adults and children’s training, (clinical and non-clinical compliance combined), which was part of the Trust’s Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) target. The presentation slide pack that supports this case study provides a breakdown review of compliance undertaken. The initial target set for training was 90% compliance. The Trust will continue to strive to achieve a compliance rate beyond this target; however, as at April 2012 the compliance rate had already increased to 86%. Prior to this, appraisal compliance increased from 58% in April 2011 to 88% in March 2012. Increased compliance provides evidence that the Trust’s workforce is safe, competent and valued. If we had not embarked on this project, the training and appraisal compliance would have continued to remain below acceptable standards or could even have worsened. This would have resulted in an increased risk to patients and staff because staff would not have been appropriately trained to a high standard, with the most relevant information. key aims Achieve 80% appraisal compliance by 31st March 2012. Obtain 90% mandatory and statutory training compliance by 31st March 2012. Attain the benefits associated with a fully trained and appraised workforce. It is important that staff receive training as this demonstrates that the Trust is developing its staff. Mandatory training ensures that staff have the skills necessary to recognise potential problems and to deal with them by contacting the right people. It also helps to improve patient care and the outcome of their stay within hospital by covering communication and recognition of issues relating to safeguarding patients. Other training equips staff to do their job better and to ensure that the care given to patients is streamlined and to a high standard. It reassures patients that the people looking after them are trained to the highest standards in line with best practice. Evidence of the project’s success is already showing in the Trust’s staff survey results; this year’s staff survey is expected to improve further because of this work. Towards the end of 2011, the Trust received a high grade B in an internal audit of appraisals (a grade B indicates significant assurance for the organisation with only minor adjustments needed; these were undertaken immediately). The Audit also stated that the Trust was quite a distance ahead of other Trusts in this area. The Trust is independently regulated by MONITOR, and assessed by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) and the NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA). Failure to appraise employees and provide essential training could have serious ramifications for the Trust, especially if employees are not fit to practise, which could cause serious harm to patients and/or the organisation. The overall results achieved during 2011/12 should help the Trust to evidence to regulators/ assessors that as an organisation we are effectively managing risk, directly improving the quality of our workforce and ultimately our services where needed.
  • 2. https://yorksandhumber.ewin.nhs.uk/home Good practice case study Yorkshire and the Humber key stages • Competency requirements were set up on all positions in ESR in order to clarify the specific training requirements for each post. This was carried out prior to April 2011. • Increased roll out of eLearning packages. • Review of all training requirements, frequencies and packages to ensure the right staff, get the right training at the right time. This included tailoring packages to non-clinical staff, reviewing the frequency of training needed, using alternative media such as leaflets, eLearning and classroom packages. • The workforce information SharePoint site was further developed to include new reports and traffic light reports to highlight poor performing areas to managers. The site provides monthly reports for appraisal and mandatory and statutory training compliance by employee and department. The purpose of these reports is to make it easier for managers to monitor compliance levels and target employees who are out of date. • The project took place over a 12-month period April 2011 – March 2012. Information was routinely reviewed. The managers of any areas not showing increases above 50% (June 2011) and then 70% (January 2012) received a letter from the Chief Executive and any areas performing within these thresholds, within target were sent a more ‘gentle’ letter from the Human Resources (HR) Director. • In July 2011 a simplified appraisal process for Agenda for Change employees was rolled out which made the Knowledge and Skills Framework (KSF) appraisal easier to complete, although not less time consuming, as a qualitative appraisal is still deemed imperative. • Where appraisals for staff had never taken place, the employee and line manager were contacted directly via email and asked to carry out an appraisal as a priority. • A new induction programme was introduced to ensure all new starters received all priority 1 mandatory training within their first two weeks at the Trust. • Additional classroom training was provided at quieter times such as bank holidays and over the Christmas period. • Training was provided to teams in their department, at key meetings or at handover times. • A new letter (training statement) was created and sent to individual employees which provided individuals’ with the status of their mandatory and statutory training and appraisal; they also showed the date they were next required to complete each subject. Individual training statement’s will continue to be sent to staff every 6 months to enable them to see their own progress and allow them to plan to ensure they maintain their compliance. • Computer rooms and support for eLearning were made available within the Education Centre. • Home working policy was encouraged for eLearning. • Meetings were held with the managers of low compliance areas to provide help and support on how to address the issues. background Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust is among the leading NHS Trusts in the country, employing almost 3000 staff. The 425-bed hospital was built in the 1970’s. It serves a population of over a quarter of a million people in the Barnsley area. The Trust is renowned not only for top performance but also for its friendly culture, first-rate environment and convenient location. Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust has been at the forefront of several Electronic Staff Record (ESR) developments and has successfully implemented the ESR National Learning Management System (NLMS) eLearning as a fully Smartcard enabled application. Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust was recently runner up in the category of ‘best practice and innovation using ESR’ at the Healthcare People Management (HPMA) Excellence in HRM Awards 2011. The judges’ verdict was that Barnsley has ‘pushed the boundaries of ESR further with their exemplar deployment of the system for eLearning and access to clinical systems’.
  • 3. https://yorksandhumber.ewin.nhs.uk/home Good practice case study Yorkshire and the Humber how it works • Support from the Trust Board is vital to push the importance of compliance and as such, the topic was on the Board’s monthly agenda, which presented the monthly overall status for the Trust and the performance of individual divisions. • Divisions monitored the performance of their teams/departments at monthly performance meetings. • Direct letters from the Chief Executive were sent to the managers of the poorest performing areas. Mid range, areas were sent letters from the HR Director. • New reports were introduced for managers to enable them to continually monitor their staff training and appraisals more easily (see supporting presentation slide pack). • Simplified information with regard to what courses staff needed to carry out, how to complete them and who to contact, were published on SharePoint, intranet pages and via links in a weekly bulletin. WHO WAS INVOLVED? There was significant leadership and support from the Trust Board. The Learning and Development, Informatics, KSF, HR Projects and Training Leads were the key groups involved in promoting, running and supporting this project. All staff and managers were included in the project, including medical staff. Direct targeting and meetings with clinical areas were available. Board support and performance meetings ensured it was high on the agenda of all areas. resources The project was both resource intensive and time consuming for the key groups who worked well across teams to achieve in- creases in compliance. This was particularly evident in the early months of the project when staff either had queries on the new information provided or had completed the wrong eLearning course, which needed to be further explained. Increased capacity was required from the practical training leads that provided locally delivered training within departments. Simplified documents, guidance and information were sent direct to individuals and managers. Previously, reports were provided to show compliance for individual subjects as opposed to being tools that enabled managers to manage training and appraisal compliance. Entering competency requirements onto all positions in ESR meant we could identify and provide staff with details of exactly what training was required for their role. Previously statements such as ‘all clinical staff’ were used to define requirements. key challenges The main challenge faced was being able to release staff to complete training and appraisals. Several methods were used to address this: • Ensuring all training is relevant and of appropriate duration minimises the time staff spend away from their workplace. • Provide eLearning training that can be completed at any time. For example night staff, have completed packages during quiet times on wards. • Home access to eLearning has enabled staff to complete training in a timely manner and claim the time back at a later date. This has been particularly useful for Nurse Bank Staff. • Ensure all new starters complete the Trust induction programme within their first 2 weeks so that they are not required to be released from the workplace later. • Provide additional classroom sessions at quiet times. • Training was provided to teams/ departments at handover or in meetings. • Training course bookings were monitored; where attendance was low, managers were contacted directly to notify them of available spaces. Staff completing incorrect eLearning packages was a definite issue. As there are a wealth of courses available staff would often select the incorrect course, for example, selecting Health and Safety training rather than Fire Safety training. As a result, improved simplified documentation was provided and reports have now been set up to monitor this to enable staff to be contacted if they enrol on the wrong course. This has resulted in a reduction in the number of incorrect enrolments each month. Bank Nurse staff was a significant group that had low training compliance; these staff were notified by letter that compliance must be achieved to allow them to work any future shifts. This group of staff increased its training compliance from 29% to 70% over the 12-month period.
  • 4. https://yorksandhumber.ewin.nhs.uk/home Good practice case study Yorkshire and the Humber key learning Board support was vital to the success of the project. Team working across the key departments and with training leads was also fundamental to the overall success. Simplifying documentation, reports, and entering competency requirements significantly helped staff understand what was required and when. Engagement with managers and commu- nication was crucial. Direct letters from the Chief Executive to poorer performing areas had a positive impact. The provision of classroom training at times that suit staff, not the training team, is important to ensure attendance e.g. during the Christmas period or on bank holidays. SUSTAINABILITY The reports and monitoring will continue this year and the plan is to build on the success already achieved. Key documents and guidance will continue to be maintained and individual training statements will continue to be sent to staff every 6 months. The Trust needs to manage compliance going forward as some peaks for subjects in specific months, when large amounts of staff will no longer be compliant, have been identified. Plans are being put in place to work with training leads and managers in order to help plan for this to avoid any dramatic drops in compliance. NEXT STEPS Further work needs to be carried out to improve the compliance of some specific practical subjects. The Trust is in the process of drawing up an action plan for the next 12months to maintain and improve on the compliance rates already achieved. An assessment of the quality outcomes will be included in the action plan. In April 2012, the Trust introduced improved management reports for priority 2 training courses (policy specific training). These will hopefully have the same impact as the priority 1 training reports and improve the overall compliance for these subjects. The Trust expects to meet the 90% targets (as a minimum) for both training and appraisals by March 2013. supporting material Breakdown of compliance presentation slide pack. further links NHS Employers Simplified KSF Case Study http://www.nhsemployers.org/ SharedLearning/Pages/SimplifiedKSFat- BarnsleyHospitalNHSFT.aspx CONTACT FOR FURTHER INFORMATION • Kim Reynolds Workforce Information Officer Email: Kim.Reynolds@nhs.net Telephone: 01226 433 931 ©NHSNorthWest