Phenotyping for Nutritional and End-use Quality in Breeding Programs
1. A member of CGIAR consortium www.iita.org
Phenotyping for Nutritional and End-use
Quality in Breeding Programs
2. A member of CGIAR consortium www.iita.org
Outline
Introduction
Current status
What could/should be done
Opportunities/challenges
Resource requirements
Way forward
3. A member of CGIAR consortium www.iita.org
Abebe Menkir
Peter Kulakow
Elizabeth Parkes
Ousmane Boukar
Antonio Lopez-Montes
Ronny Swennen
Delphine Amah
Michael Abberton
Oladeji Alamu
Adebayo Abass
Ismail Rabbi
Team
4. A member of CGIAR consortium www.iita.org
Enhancing crop quality improves processing efficiencies, makes
more desirable and more diverse consumer products and ensures
the competitiveness of farmers, traders, millers and end
processors.
Crop quality criteria vary drastically depending on the end-use.
Similarly, crop varieties may show large differences in their
nutritional, processing and end-use quality attributes.
Therefore, while getting breeding priorities and strategies, one
must consider:
the variety’s intended end uses and/or the demands of the targeted market
specific quality traits to breed for, and
genotype × environment × management interactions that may influence the quality of the
resulting variety.
Introduction
5. A member of CGIAR consortium www.iita.org
Nutritional
Quality
o Starch
o Total sugars
o Total ash
o Moisture content
o Protein/ Lysine and Tryptophan
o Fat
o Carotenoids
o Minerals (iron, zinc, potassium and
calcium)
o Dietary fiber/crude fiber
o Vitamin C
Current Status
6. A member of CGIAR consortium www.iita.org
Anti-nutritional
factors
o Phytate
o Tannins
o Trypsin inhibitors
o Cynogenic potential
Current Status
7. A member of CGIAR consortium www.iita.org
Functional
properties
o Pasting properties
o Swelling power
o Color
o 1000 kernel weight
o Water absorption and
binding capacity
o Particle size distribution
Current Status
8. A member of CGIAR consortium www.iita.org
Deep orange kernel color does NOT
implies high ProVA content
Current Status
9. A member of CGIAR consortium www.iita.org
Spectrophtotometry
Current Status
Liquid chromatography
- HPLC
- UPLC
10. A member of CGIAR consortium www.iita.org
NIRS
Current Status
ICP-OES
Texture Analyser
XRF
11. A member of CGIAR consortium www.iita.org
o Thiamine
o Riboflavin
o Amino acid analysis
o Carbohydrate
o Bioavailability
o NIRS
o XRF
What could/should be done
Method
development/Equipment
12. A member of CGIAR consortium www.iita.org
In-vitro caco 2 cell method
for screening for
bioavailability of iron
What could/should be done
13. A member of CGIAR consortium www.iita.org
Challenges Recruitment of qualified
personnel
Source of chemicals and cost of
analyses
Equipment maintenance and
repair
Lack of personnel and facilities
in national programs
14. A member of CGIAR consortium www.iita.org
Opportunities o Collaboration with other Centers
(ILRI)
o Integrating end user quality traits
in breeding programs
o Metabolomics
o AgriFood Systems CRPs
15. A member of CGIAR consortium www.iita.org
Resource Requirements
Human resource (IRS and NRS)
Laboratory equipments
Food Scientist/Technologist for each
crop, especially the crops where we
have a world mandate (yams and
cowpea) and we are the only center
conducting research (soybean)
16. A member of CGIAR consortium www.iita.org
Way forward • Establishment of a food and
nutrition quality laboratory in
each Hub
• High-throughput portable
equipments
• Identification of laboratories
for outsourcing
• Underutilized crops
17. A member of CGIAR consortium www.iita.org
Acknowledgement
o Maize Team through HPlus and SARD-SC projects
o ILRI through the DDG-R
o Monsanto
o USDA
18. A member of CGIAR consortium www.iita.org
THANK YOU