Assure Ecommerce and Retail Operations Uptime with ThousandEyes
Comparative Genomics for Marker Development in Cassava
1. Comparative Genomics for Marker Development
in Cassava
Melaku Gedil
IITA R4D Week
November 23, 2009
Ibadan, Nigeria
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture – Institut international d’agriculture tropicale – www.iita.org
13. PCR Amplification with degenerate primers
Amplification with degenerate primers 50F-470RL was considered for
derived from At-NBS-LRR further analysis. Four DNA
Three forward and 7 reverse primers templates (TME3, TME7, and
(a total of 21 pairs) were tested TME117-a, TME-117-b) were
on the TME3 clone (Fig. x). amplified (Fig. xx). Amplicon
Different primer pairs yielded
size ranged from 200 – 900
different pattern of banding with
fragment sizes ranging from 500- bp.
1500 bp.
16. Sequence Analysis
Sequences edited
Sequences assembled
Sequence Clustered, identity matrix,
Similarity search in Genbank – BLAST
STS primers for resequencing
Marker development for MAS
37. Work in progress
• Sequence analysis and characterization
• Search on cassava and castor genome
• Re-sequencing primers from candidate
sequences (STS) for marker discovery
– in a panel of R and S cultivars
– BSA analysis of potential primers
– Develop PCR-based markers
* Allele Specific-PCR
* CAPS marker
38. Applications
1. Molecular markers (SNP, STS)
2. Gene discovery
3. Physical mapping (Qiu 2007 leaf rust R in wheat)
4. NBS profiling of genetic diversity – a modification
of AFLP (Mantovani 2006)
5. Host-pathogen interaction/pathways e.g. ATP-
binding or hydrolysis
6. Genome wide survey of Resistance genes
(Arabidopsis, Rice, poplar, Grape, papaya)
39. Advantages
1.Protocol is adaptable to other crops….e.g.
yam, cowpea
2.All resistance genes – insights to the
structure & organization
3.Starting material for comparative
genomics based data mining of R genes
4.Easy and cost-effective to generate data
5.Markers are gene-based (not random
association)
40. Application of Markers in Breeding
1. Gene mining in genetic resources (germplasm
evaluation)
• Selection of parents (diversity analysis/heterotic
group)
• Cultivar identity (‘branding’), hybrid validation
2. Introgression: minimizes linkage drag, saves time
(e.g. AB-QTL)
3. Pyramiding – traits from multiple parents
4. New approaches such as
• Marker-assisted Recurrent selection (MARS)
• Genome-wide selection (GWS)
Melaku Gedil
41. Key issues in implementation of MAB
1. Availability of genomic resources
2. Cost-effective genotyping systems
• Declining cost of genotyping and a choice of genotyping
technologies and markers
• Capital costs not necessary, (subcontract to service providers -
GCP)
3. Multienvironment phenotyping (GxE, epistasis)
• Genotyping no longer an issue
4. Accurate Marker-trait association methods (LD, QTL)
• Begin with less complex traits
• Advances in genomics (structural, functional) and other -omics,
and other disciplines, will elucidate the genetic mechanism of
complex traits of economic importance.
Melaku Gedil