Research on CBSV and CBSD. Variability of Cassava Brown Streak Disease Symptoms and the Relationship Between Virus Infection and Symptoms Expression in On-farm Cassava.Factors Affecting Disease Severity in Cassava brown streak virus (Potyviridae; Ipomovirus) Infected Plants
4. Background CBSD
1890s, Tanzania (Wahlberg)
1930s, Tanzania (Storey)
CBSD limited to coastal/low altitude areas
2001, Causal organism- Cassava brown streak virus, ss +
RNA (Monger et al.)
Family;Potyviridae, Genus; Ipomovirus
2005, Transmitted by Bemisia tabaci ca. 2%
2005, Reports of the spread of disease/economic
damage in high altitude areas-Uganda
2006, Reports of symptoms in DRC,Zambia
2008, Angola? Burundi?
www.iita.org
5. Potyvirus genome strategy e.g. TEV
0 10 Kb
gRNA
5’ VPg poly(A) 3’
Polyprotein
?
MP HC-Pro Pro Rep Pol CP
* * *
For pathogen-mediated strategies for virus resistance (PTGS) sequence
data are needed www.iita.org
8. CBSD
Research
Survey
Detection/symptoms
Symptom reliability
Transmission
Lab/screenhouse/
field
Virus preps
Sampling strategies
www.iita.org
9. 1. Survey-CBSD and CBSV
further samples in TZ plus coastal
Kenya, Burundi and Rwanda
CBSD symptom analyses
CBSV sequence analyses
www.iita.org
10. CBSV/CBSD assessments
Major surveys in Tanzania in 2005 and 2006
Minor testing in coastal Kenya, Burundi and Rwanda in
2007
First surveys included evaluation of sampling storage
for RT-PCR tests
Evaluated the best type of tissue for sampling and
tissue dilution tests for larger samplings by RT-
PCR
RT-PCR using CBSV specific CP gene primers
200bp
www.iita.org
15. Conclusions
CBSD and CBSV found in all areas of
Tanzania and Kenya
Incidences and severity of CBSD had an
inverse correlation with the altitude
Sequence diversity is on the border of
speciation limits for CBSV
www.iita.org
16. 2. CBSV transmission experiments through
various inoculations to virus-free
material in controlled conditions with
Tanzanian CBSV isolates
(TC and meristem culture)
Cassava indicators
Backed up with laboratory indexing
www.iita.org
19. Sap transmission of CBSV
Buffer A Buffer B
60
50
% CBSV-infected (RT-PCR)
40
30
20
10
0
3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 16 24
-10 Weeks after inoculation
Figure 1. Relationship between inoculation buffers and time to CBSV
detection www.iita.org
21. Results
54 % (13/24 plants) inoculated with Buffer
B and 29 % (7/24 plants) inoculated with
Buffer A tested positive to CBSV.
Grafting techniques had 100 % transmission
efficiency.
CBSV-free scions onto CBSV-infected
rootstocks was the most efficient
transmission technique
www.iita.org
22. Ctd
CBSV was not transmitted through
infected root debris although 17 %
(4.5/27 plants) test plants on the
debris-soil mixture produced foliar
chloroses in veins.
Cutting tools and leaf harvesting led to
(6.6/30) 22 % and (1/15 plants) 7 %
transmission efficiency respectively.
None of 180 seedlings from CBSV-
infected plants had detectible CBSV.
www.iita.org
23. Conclusions
CBSV may be transmitted through sap, grafting,
cutting tools and leaf harvesting.
Graft inoculation with an infected rootstock is
the most efficient way to transmit the virus.
Transmission through CBSV-infected root debris
seems remote from the study.
For the first time, it was demonstrated that
agronomical practices have potential to
hasten the spread of CBSV which may lead to
new epidemics. www.iita.org
24. 3.Screen house experiment:
Cuttings collected from plants with diverse CBSD
symptoms planted in pots
Symptoms monitored for 12 months
4.Field experiment:
Representative cassava cultivars of the major types of
foliar and root symptoms were identified
Included Albert, Cheupe, Kibaha, Nachinyaya, Namikonga
and AR 49/2.
Grown in the 6 cv. x 3 reps. Total of 108 plants/cultivar at
SRI
Symptoms monitored and recorded monthly
Experiment duration; 2 years.
www.iita.org
25. Relationship btn CBSV & type of root symptoms
Lake zone Coastal zone Southern zone
35
31.91
30
CBSD incidence (%)
25
25.27
20
17.01
15
10.64
10
5
5.5
2.13 3.13 2.13
1.13 1.13
0 0 0 0 0 0
Positive Positive Negative Positive Negative
Brown mass Chalkish necrosis (%) Necrotic specks (%)
necrosis (%)
Root symptoms & RT-PCR test
www.iita.org
26. Symptomless &
negative
Test sample
Symptomless &
positive
Symptomatic &
negative
Symptomatic &
positive
0 20 40 60 80 100
% of total
Relationship between CBSV infections and symptoms on samples
www.iita.org
27. Lake zone Coastal zone Southern zone
18
16.05
16 14.81
14
CBSD incidence (%)
12.34
12
10 9.17
8.64
8
6.59 6.17
6.17 6.06
6
4 2.8
2.47 2.1 2.01
2 1.2 1.02 1.2 1.2
0
0
Positive Negative Positive Negative Positive Negative
Chlorotic blotches (%) Chlorotic spots (%) Vein chlorosis (%)
Symptom type & RT-PCR test
www.iita.org
28. Generation of virus –free cuttings
• None of the cuttings from the
diseased plants germinated disease
free.
• Only two plants from one diseased
mother plant (score 2) became
disease free
www.iita.org
29. Conclusions
CBSD symptoms are diverse
Careful observation should be made to correctly diagnose
the disease.
Newly established types of foliar and root symptoms of
CBSD may improve on the diagnosis.
Relationship between CBSV infection & symptom
expression was established.
The expression of CBSD foliar symptoms may not
necessarily indicate CBSV infection.
www.iita.org
30. Ctd.......
Not all symptomless plants are free from CBSV.
Detection of CBSV in symptomless plants complicates its
diagnosis and management.
The expression of CBSD foliar symptoms may not
necessarily indicate CBSV infection.
www.iita.org
31. 5.Variability of Cassava Brown Streak Disease
Symptoms and the Relationship Between Virus
Infection and Symptoms Expression in On-farm
Cassava
CBSD symptoms became complex and difficult to
comprehend under field conditions
Unknown relationship between infection with CBSV and
symptom expression
Unknown distribution of CBSV in various tissues of
infected plants
Farmer belief that CBSD-free plants may be regenerated
from diseased plants
www.iita.org
32. 6.Factors Affecting Disease Severity in Cassava brown
streak virus (Potyviridae; Ipomovirus) Infected Plants
Susceptibility of selected cultivars with time & age
Field experiment at SRI
Temperature using a growth chamber
www.iita.org
33. Low temperature High temperature
7 Linear (Low temperature) Linear (High temperature)
6 Y = 0.0906x + 1.2857
R2 = 0.7821
CBSD foliar severity
5
4
3
Y = 0.05x + 1.1333
2 R2 = 0.6172
1
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Days after exposure
Effect of temperature on cv. Albert www.iita.org
34. Diseased &stressed Diseased &Irrigated
80 Linear (Diseased &stressed) Linear (Diseased &Irrigated)
70
No. of dead leaves (mean)
Y = 0.7683x - 8.3066
60 R2 = 0.9529
50
40
30
20
Y = 0.0253x - 0.1816
10
R2 = 0.635
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
Days after exposure
Effect of moisture stress on cv. Albert
www.iita.org
35. Conclusions
CBSD affected cultivars tends to adapt to new
environment.
Foliar CBSD symptoms are more apparent than stem
symptoms.
CBSD incidence and severity levels are cultivar specific &
increases with plants age.
Low temperature is critical to the survival of CBSD-
affected plants.
Moisture stress is also a vital determinant of CBSD
severity.
www.iita.org
36. 7. Viral preparations
Materials moved from
coastal Kenya to KEPHIS-
PQS Maguga in 2006-7 and
kept under quarantine
conditions
Research assistant trained
in purification methods at
BeCA
www.iita.org
38. Viral prep.
Final density-centrifugation
sediment fractions are
analysed by PAGE and RT-
PCR -2007-8
No success in cassava (2
cultivars) or three
herbaceous indicators
Kiribiti mwezi analysed in
duplicate looks promising in
Nicotiana benthamiana
Dec 08
www.iita.org
39. 8.Sampling methods
TC free materials
CBSV materials
x cultivars x reps
9.Parts of plant best for sampling
CBSV infected plants at different
growth stages
x cultivars x reps
10. RNA extraction methods optimised www.iita.org
40. Take sample leaflet 2 or
three leaves from growing
point of the plant
Preserve over
silica gel or
between
newspaper strips
in sealed tubes
(do not over-stuff)
Tissue paper
Silica gel-blue
www.iita.org
41. 10-leaf sample
representing 10
plants
Punched sample grind directly in
PUNCH ‘fuge tube with tube pestle for
RNA extraction
www.iita.org
42. 10-leaf sample
representing 10 plants
10 lobes from 10
leaves
Scissors 10 strips from 10 lobes-grind in liq N2 for RNA
sample
www.iita.org
44. • Cassava genetic transformation for the
longevity of cassava virus resistance in
Tanzania
• Mikocheni Agricultural Research Institute
(MARI) under
Ministry of Agriculture, Food Security and Co-operatives
Government of The United Republic of Tanzania
• The Rockefeller Foundation funded
• IITA as partners; IITA-capacity building in cassava
transformation and biosafety training plus increasing the
laboratory facilities (Ingelbrecht & Herron)
• Tropical Crops Research Institute (TPRI) –additional partner
To be continued in 2009 by BMGates Foundation
44
www.iita.org
45. Application for Contained Laboratory and Greenhouse
Research on Cassava Transformation for the Longevity of
Cassava Virus Resistance in Tanzania
Submitted for review to
Ministry of Agriculture Food Security and Cooperatives
November 2006
Applicant:
Dr JOSEPH NDUNGURU
MIKOCHENI AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Box 6226, Dar es Salaam
Tel. 255-22-2700552
Fax: 255-22-2775549
Email: mari@mari.or.tz
www.iita.org
46. AC AC AC AC
5.4m
8m
8
Store Office
m
8
m
Screen
3.9 1.5
House
Growth
Room 1
10.3m
Growth Room
2
4m Biolistic Laminar
+ Extraction Laminar FC
Potting Bench Pot Storage
Transfer
Soil Storage Fridge D/Freezer
Storage
Molecular Lab
6.0m
Terrazzo Lab Bench
4.3 AUTO-
CLAVE
Coats/Sho
es Washing
AC AC
5.4m 5.4m
Fig.1: Sketch of the Proposed Containment Laboratory at ARI Mikocheni www.iita.org
53. New Sources of Resistance
Testing was done by grafting virus-free clones onto infected
rootstocks
• CBSV:
– 96/1089A
– TME 117
• CMV:
– 96/1089A (does not support neither virus
multiplication nor movement)
www.iita.org
54. I-96-1089A plant 3 with distinct leaf tertiary vein chlorosis to various
extents on two of the lower leaves 15/02/08
www.iita.org
55. Close up of the tertiary vein chlorosis on leaflet of plant 3 of I-96-1089A;
arrows indicate tertiary leaflet veins 15/02/08
www.iita.org
56. 96/1089A infected by CMD at Kibaha
Whitefly infested plant No whiteflies
www.iita.org