Mapping suitable niche for cactus and legumes in diversified farming in drylands
BGRI Global Rust Monitoring: Challenges and Opportunities for Stripe Rust
1. BGRI Global Rust Monitoring: Challenges and Opportunities for Stripe Rust Dave Hodson, AGP Division, FAO International Stripe Rust Symposium, ICARDA, Aleppo, 18-20th April 2011
10. Photo: A. Yahyaoui (ICARDA) Survey / Sampling – Tools & Protocols BGRI protocols manual Field survey forms GPS protocols Sampling protocols “Quick Sets” – race analysis Extensive in-country field training R. Park (Uni. Sydney) K. Nazari (ICARDA) A. Yahyaoui (ICARDA) Z. Pretorius (Uni. Free State) K. Cressman (FAO) T. Fetch (Ag. Agri-Food Canada) Yue Jin (USDA-ARS) D. Hodson (CIMMYT)
20. Constraints: Year-round analysis, sample viability, analytical capacityData sources: AAFC, Canada; Uni Free State, South Africa; USDA-ARS Cereals Disease Lab, USA
21.
22. Pathotypes, +...On-line Data Entry Quality control/publish Data Export / Exchange User Management Crop Problem Dbase (survey, pathotypes, [Trap nursery, Molecular] ) External Applications e.g., RustMapper
23. Delivering Information: Rust SPORE Dedicated web portal: Rust SPORE http://www.fao.org/agriculture/crops/rust/stem/en/ Updates Tracking Country Surveys Pathotypes 3 UN languages (English, Arabic, Russian) Centralized Dbase (Aarhus), embedded applications (Aarhus + CIMMYT) Target: Scientists, Decision-makers, Public Awareness
24. Status Summary Component Stem Rust Stripe Rust Coordinated Global x ü Response Clearly defined target ? ü Information Systems + Data X (not global) ü Management Surveillance Networks + Spillover from stem rust ü Tools (timeliness?) Pathotyping Capacity (with limitations) (GRRC, some limitations) ü ü Ahead of Disease progress? x ü
26. Stripe Rust Summary- 2010 14 Bulgaria: “First outbreaks in 20 years” Uzbekistan: worse than 2009 – all varieties susceptible. extensive chemical control (x3 sprays) Iran: Effective control Turkey: Severe in south-east. USDA estimating 1M ton losses Syria: Estimates of 300,00 ha affected. USDA: Possible 1.25M ton losses India: Unfavourable environmental conditions (same in Pakistan). No losses Iraq: Estimated 10-15% yield losses in north Ethiopia: Over 400,000 ha affected. Losses??
27. Stripe Rust 2011: Hitting the headlines India, 30th March 2011 Turkey, 10th April 2011 China, 31st March 2011
28. 16 Current Threat: Stripe Rust The most damaging wheat disease on the global scale 2 New highly aggressive strains + rapid global spread (Hovmøller et al., 2008) Breakdown of a key resistance gene (Yr27) in CWANA (prior warnings: Singh & Huerta-Espino, 2001; McDonald et al., 2004) Mega cultivars withYr27 are currently planted on more than 15 million hectares (North Africa to South Asia)
32. Movements vs independent events? 1995 GRRC, ICARDA rust facility + others all playing a vital role
33. Challenges Disease widespread and dispersed An uncertain target (Yr27 vir, Aggressive pathotypes...)? Movements? pathogen present (throughout?) conducive environment main driver of outbreaks? High inoculumlevels: very high risk of accidental human-borne movements Role of changing climate? Sampling over-capacity in terms of collection under capacity in terms of analysis Rapid detection + reporting + good contingency plan required for targeted chemical control on initial outbreaks
34. Opportunities Foundation / lessons learned from stem rust data management + information systems surveillance networks global overview Cultivar change – promotion of durable resistant cultivars (other rusts + traits as well)
35. Issues to be addressed Rapid detection + reporting: sms networks, in-country systems, information flows Environmental suitability improved early warning of disease, models Pathotyping capacity international + in-country Efficient promotion and deployment of durable resistance Resourcing
36. Many pieces of the puzzle are there (in this room!) CG Centers (CIMMYT, ICARDA) Global Rust Reference Centre, Aarhus Advanced Rust Research Labs National Programs International Agencies Donors International Surveillance Networks Information Systems + Data Management Tools
38. Acknowledgements All contributing national partners PBI, University of Sydney ICARDA CIMMYT AAFC, Canada CDL, Minnesota, USA University of the Free State, South Africa Aarhus University, Denmark
Notas do Editor
Data management system developed by Aarhus University, Denmark in collaboration with BGRI / FAOSits on top of a centralized Crop Problem Dbase – currently holds survey and pathotype data but will be expanded to include trap nursery and molecular diagnostic data. Flexible dbase capable of holding all 3 rust diseases – expansion in progress to incorporate yellow rust data.Toolbox permits: user management (different access / permission levels); on-line data entry; data quality control and publishingOutputs: Series of data-base driven graphical tools. Currently: survey mapping, pathotype frequencies and distributions over time. Additional tools planned for the future. All outputs as iframes so seemelessly embedded in external websites eg Rust SPORE at FAO.Standard data export / exchange permitting direct connection to external applications eg RustMapper at CIMMYT.