SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 3
Baixar para ler offline
Concluding remarks ….
Dr. Rafael Aragunde
Interamerican University of Puerto Rico
I have to start by acknowledging the rich variety of positions presented by the different participants. The
invitation to think ourselves under the guise of our relationship to the Global Agenda was answered by a
wide diversity of scholars from all parts of the world: Australia and Sweden; Kenya and Pakistan; Brazil
and Malaysia; India and Lithuania; UK and Ghana; France and Japan; Israel and Jamaica; Egypt and the
USA are a few of the places from which colleagues have flown to Puerto Rico to think and converse
about the alternative paths to the future that Higher Education proposes.

In the opening session on Tuesday evening we were invited to “think about trends, developments and
preoccupations” in higher education, in the words of Juan Ramón de la Fuente. And that’s what was done
in the next two days and a half.

The morning session on Wednesday was crowned by the visual richness of the world some of us – the
very privileged who work in Higher Education institutions - are starting to inhabit. That is the kind of
world we would all like to share and yet we know perfectly well that it won’t be easy to achieve. There is
no need to insist that there was a train of thought throughout the conference that stressed this alternative
path to the future. There are great possibilities of development, many seem to have told us in their own
ways, and it’s just a matter of following what science and learning, understood and defined in weberian
terms, have to offer. But will this suffice? It hasn’t in the past. What kind of guarantee do we have that
that kind of scientific and industrial rationality will do justice to those who share the planet? How often
since the Enlightenment, and the period that followed, where many and not only positivists, thought that
science and its progress would put an end to injustice, have we read and heard that techno-scientific
development will solve all of our problems?

But that same Wednesday morning session gave us another alternative pathway to the future. Not only
higher education as a public good is now contested in countries where universities have been part of
their culture for centuries and soon for a millennium, but also in lands where higher education hasn’t had
too many birthdays and where resources that were scarce at times today are being fought over because
they are not there anymore. What were many of our colleagues telling us, never losing their smiles and
hopes? In fact, at times I thought that they were not telling us enough about their needs. But from what I
heard it seems that they don’t need the competition they are getting from all kinds of foreign universities,
besides not counting with a state that will support them properly. This alternative path to the future which
is being forced on some institutions is obviously much more challenging for they must face, from a weak
position, the unpredictable behavior of markets and their irrationality. It would be interesting to know
how many agreements were made during these days between those that are representing universities that
had a chance to develop with the help of strong national support and no foreign competition and
universities that have too much of the later and hardly anything of the former. These are the challenges
facing a globalized humanity. Are Higher Education institutions addressing them?, was the first question
we had to address.

There was an evident consensus in respect to funding and what it means in reality. No higher education
institution feels satisfied with what it has or receives. There was a time when in the name of autonomy
Faculty resisted what was conveniently thought improper state intervention. Those were the days when
research was a thing done in very few universities around the world. Money would come in from the state
or as revenue from moderate tuition and there was not much else we would do besides “teaching”.
Legislatures didn’t question us. But history has a way of laughing at its inexperienced actors. Anyway,
during the conference nobody questioned the assertion that money goes nowadays where politicians and
big multinational companies want it to go. That was the unanimous answer given to the second question
How and where are current dominant funding models steering higher education and research? But
shouldn’t the question have been phrased differently. We should have forced ourselves to think about the
possibility of other funding models that don’t include raising student tuition and becoming slaves of
capitalism’s latest trend? Because that’s what we have been doing. This question, phrased this way, would
have given us the chance to identify alternative paths. Stated as it was, it doesn’t seem to have inspired
much thought. But isn’t the need to find new funding models one of the biggest challenges that we are
facing, especially in the developing countries where research in general terms is, very often, not a priority.

Yet research or whatever we get obsessed with doesn’t need to be a priority, as was clearly suggested by
certain panelists, and which takes us to the third alternative path to the future that, we must admit, was not
enough dwelled upon. And this third path is not only a very valid answer to that second question, which
we would rephrase. It is also a convenient answer to the first one and, if you allow me, to the third
question we dealt with, which was: Is globalization setting a new agenda for internationalization of
higher education? Nosce te ipsum. Know yourself. Work on your strengths. Get rid of what is not
relevant. Why force your Faculty to publish in magazines that don’t add much to what you are, or that
nobody reads. Productivity is highly overrated. The most important things in our lives – all experiences -
love, health, culture, are all the results of a change of rhythm. Globalization might be a fact, but you
don’t need to be obsessive about sending or bringing students and faculty just because everybody is doing
it. Internationalization opens up doors, but how many doors can you walk through when you want to get
to know a different culture?

Once you get to know yourself, be yourself. But be yourself and undertake a project that will reconsider
for example the way we compete with each other, as stated yesterday by one of the panelist. We can
compete to improve each other, not to beat the other. We must rescue public discourse where we make
explicit the values involved in the decisions that are being made. We need a vision of what is success so
that its criteria is not defined by performance, management managed by the latest fad, or based on a
misunderstanding of scholarship. Our business is knowledge. And we can pursue a knowledge that
contributes to a world public culture; that resists manipulative elites; and that makes sure that ethics is not
displaced by pergormance. Did we insist enough on this?

Concluding, lots of good things are going on in our institutions and what we heard is definitely
encouraging. But what fills us with optimism are all those projects that stem out from institutions’
strengths and from a courageous evaluation of what is really taking place in the world. If restructuring is
necessary, it should take into account that since neo liberalism spread its wings more than two decades
ago we haven’t gotten richer, higher education has lost much of what it once pretended to be and that
critical approaches to these realities have gotten scarcer. But then, higher education does posses a huge
amounts of creativity. Based on that, we certainly must work on that third path that will respect the
different.
I cannot end without thanking Eva Egron Polak and our Chancellor Marilyna Wayland and their teams for
their efforts. They did organize a very successful and enjoyable meeting. We should also thank President
Manuel Fernós for bringing us the 14th. General conference and IAU President Juan Ramón de la Fuente
for his support and, aware that I might be breaking with the protocol – why not – I invite everybody to
give them a round of applause for a great and unforgettable week that we know took endless days to
organize and that has been a real success.

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

WRRCEA Proceedings Revised Oct-20 15 (1)
WRRCEA Proceedings Revised Oct-20 15 (1)WRRCEA Proceedings Revised Oct-20 15 (1)
WRRCEA Proceedings Revised Oct-20 15 (1)Natasha Hart Frey
 
ARC 211: American Diversity and Design: Anika French
ARC 211: American Diversity and Design: Anika FrenchARC 211: American Diversity and Design: Anika French
ARC 211: American Diversity and Design: Anika FrenchAnika French
 
The Brand of Higher Education: Context for The Conflict
The Brand of Higher Education: Context for The ConflictThe Brand of Higher Education: Context for The Conflict
The Brand of Higher Education: Context for The Conflictidfive
 
Hindsight 2020: The Future of Higher Education
Hindsight 2020: The Future of Higher EducationHindsight 2020: The Future of Higher Education
Hindsight 2020: The Future of Higher EducationElizabeth Bunting
 
Juan Ramon de la Fuenter_IAU Puerto Rico 27.11.12
Juan Ramon de la Fuenter_IAU Puerto Rico 27.11.12Juan Ramon de la Fuenter_IAU Puerto Rico 27.11.12
Juan Ramon de la Fuenter_IAU Puerto Rico 27.11.12IAU_Past_Conferences
 
Tax exempt foundations_hearings-reece_committee-1953_4-1086pgs-part2-gov
Tax exempt foundations_hearings-reece_committee-1953_4-1086pgs-part2-govTax exempt foundations_hearings-reece_committee-1953_4-1086pgs-part2-gov
Tax exempt foundations_hearings-reece_committee-1953_4-1086pgs-part2-govRareBooksnRecords
 
StandardizedTesting
StandardizedTestingStandardizedTesting
StandardizedTestingLucas Somma
 
Making the Case for Higher Education
Making the Case for Higher EducationMaking the Case for Higher Education
Making the Case for Higher EducationLarryEdwardPenley
 

Mais procurados (13)

Chiang mai pres eva egron polak
Chiang mai  pres eva egron polakChiang mai  pres eva egron polak
Chiang mai pres eva egron polak
 
Durban p3 madeleine green
Durban p3 madeleine greenDurban p3 madeleine green
Durban p3 madeleine green
 
WRRCEA Proceedings Revised Oct-20 15 (1)
WRRCEA Proceedings Revised Oct-20 15 (1)WRRCEA Proceedings Revised Oct-20 15 (1)
WRRCEA Proceedings Revised Oct-20 15 (1)
 
ARC 211: American Diversity and Design: Anika French
ARC 211: American Diversity and Design: Anika FrenchARC 211: American Diversity and Design: Anika French
ARC 211: American Diversity and Design: Anika French
 
The uphill generation
The uphill generationThe uphill generation
The uphill generation
 
The Brand of Higher Education: Context for The Conflict
The Brand of Higher Education: Context for The ConflictThe Brand of Higher Education: Context for The Conflict
The Brand of Higher Education: Context for The Conflict
 
Hindsight 2020: The Future of Higher Education
Hindsight 2020: The Future of Higher EducationHindsight 2020: The Future of Higher Education
Hindsight 2020: The Future of Higher Education
 
2008_CARE_Report
2008_CARE_Report2008_CARE_Report
2008_CARE_Report
 
Juan Ramon de la Fuenter_IAU Puerto Rico 27.11.12
Juan Ramon de la Fuenter_IAU Puerto Rico 27.11.12Juan Ramon de la Fuenter_IAU Puerto Rico 27.11.12
Juan Ramon de la Fuenter_IAU Puerto Rico 27.11.12
 
Tax exempt foundations_hearings-reece_committee-1953_4-1086pgs-part2-gov
Tax exempt foundations_hearings-reece_committee-1953_4-1086pgs-part2-govTax exempt foundations_hearings-reece_committee-1953_4-1086pgs-part2-gov
Tax exempt foundations_hearings-reece_committee-1953_4-1086pgs-part2-gov
 
Connectivity Presentation
Connectivity PresentationConnectivity Presentation
Connectivity Presentation
 
StandardizedTesting
StandardizedTestingStandardizedTesting
StandardizedTesting
 
Making the Case for Higher Education
Making the Case for Higher EducationMaking the Case for Higher Education
Making the Case for Higher Education
 

Destaque

Destaque (10)

A roman lopez.061809
A roman lopez.061809A roman lopez.061809
A roman lopez.061809
 
Orientacion carta circular 19 2014-2015
Orientacion carta circular 19 2014-2015Orientacion carta circular 19 2014-2015
Orientacion carta circular 19 2014-2015
 
Author's Purpose & Analyzing an Editorial - Unit 11.3
Author's Purpose & Analyzing an Editorial - Unit 11.3Author's Purpose & Analyzing an Editorial - Unit 11.3
Author's Purpose & Analyzing an Editorial - Unit 11.3
 
Point of View and Wordless Book - Unit 12.3
Point of View and Wordless Book - Unit 12.3Point of View and Wordless Book - Unit 12.3
Point of View and Wordless Book - Unit 12.3
 
EDUC 621-20: Modelo de Diseño Curriclar, no técnico no cientifico afecto de w...
EDUC 621-20: Modelo de Diseño Curriclar, no técnico no cientifico afecto de w...EDUC 621-20: Modelo de Diseño Curriclar, no técnico no cientifico afecto de w...
EDUC 621-20: Modelo de Diseño Curriclar, no técnico no cientifico afecto de w...
 
Educ 621: Modelo de Diseño Durricular de Wiles & Bondi
Educ 621: Modelo de Diseño Durricular de Wiles & BondiEduc 621: Modelo de Diseño Durricular de Wiles & Bondi
Educ 621: Modelo de Diseño Durricular de Wiles & Bondi
 
EDUC 621-20: Diseño Curricular
EDUC 621-20: Diseño CurricularEDUC 621-20: Diseño Curricular
EDUC 621-20: Diseño Curricular
 
EDUC 621: Componentes del Diseno Curricular
EDUC 621: Componentes del Diseno Curricular EDUC 621: Componentes del Diseno Curricular
EDUC 621: Componentes del Diseno Curricular
 
Orientacion sobre Carta Circular 19 2014-2015
Orientacion sobre Carta Circular 19 2014-2015Orientacion sobre Carta Circular 19 2014-2015
Orientacion sobre Carta Circular 19 2014-2015
 
EDUC 621: Conceptos y Fundamentos del Curriculo
EDUC 621: Conceptos y Fundamentos del CurriculoEDUC 621: Conceptos y Fundamentos del Curriculo
EDUC 621: Conceptos y Fundamentos del Curriculo
 

Semelhante a Concluding Remarks - R. Aragunde

College Entry Essay Examples.pdf
College Entry Essay Examples.pdfCollege Entry Essay Examples.pdf
College Entry Essay Examples.pdfEmily Owusuansah
 
Power_to_Create_The_new_digital_age
Power_to_Create_The_new_digital_agePower_to_Create_The_new_digital_age
Power_to_Create_The_new_digital_ageAnthony Painter
 
Wk 8 using information going beyond the point worksheet
Wk 8 using information going beyond the point worksheetWk 8 using information going beyond the point worksheet
Wk 8 using information going beyond the point worksheetRhianWynWilliams
 
Judging After Highly Informative Conversation
Judging After Highly Informative ConversationJudging After Highly Informative Conversation
Judging After Highly Informative ConversationBest Custom Papers Muncie
 
Globalization Pillar Narrative
Globalization Pillar NarrativeGlobalization Pillar Narrative
Globalization Pillar Narrativecarrionc
 
What Is Modding And It Is Important For Many Reasons
What Is Modding And It Is Important For Many ReasonsWhat Is Modding And It Is Important For Many Reasons
What Is Modding And It Is Important For Many ReasonsLeslie Thomas
 
Out of our mind ken robinson
Out of our mind ken robinsonOut of our mind ken robinson
Out of our mind ken robinsonEdorta Agirre
 
My Philosophy Of Life Essay Pdf. Online assignment writing service.
My Philosophy Of Life Essay Pdf. Online assignment writing service.My Philosophy Of Life Essay Pdf. Online assignment writing service.
My Philosophy Of Life Essay Pdf. Online assignment writing service.Lisa Young
 
Scientists as Storytellers Guide
Scientists as Storytellers GuideScientists as Storytellers Guide
Scientists as Storytellers GuideFazmy Jaffar
 

Semelhante a Concluding Remarks - R. Aragunde (20)

Durban p3 s.o. ikenberry
Durban p3 s.o. ikenberryDurban p3 s.o. ikenberry
Durban p3 s.o. ikenberry
 
Exploring the Value of Lifelong Learning, SF Fed Viewpoint
Exploring the Value of Lifelong Learning, SF Fed ViewpointExploring the Value of Lifelong Learning, SF Fed Viewpoint
Exploring the Value of Lifelong Learning, SF Fed Viewpoint
 
College Entry Essay Examples.pdf
College Entry Essay Examples.pdfCollege Entry Essay Examples.pdf
College Entry Essay Examples.pdf
 
An att glob_persp_04_11_29
An att glob_persp_04_11_29An att glob_persp_04_11_29
An att glob_persp_04_11_29
 
Guadal pp eva egron polak
Guadal pp eva egron polakGuadal pp eva egron polak
Guadal pp eva egron polak
 
Durban p2 g. dhanarajan
Durban p2 g. dhanarajanDurban p2 g. dhanarajan
Durban p2 g. dhanarajan
 
Durban p3 juan ramon de la fuente
Durban p3 juan ramon de la fuenteDurban p3 juan ramon de la fuente
Durban p3 juan ramon de la fuente
 
Power_to_Create_The_new_digital_age
Power_to_Create_The_new_digital_agePower_to_Create_The_new_digital_age
Power_to_Create_The_new_digital_age
 
Wk 8 using information going beyond the point worksheet
Wk 8 using information going beyond the point worksheetWk 8 using information going beyond the point worksheet
Wk 8 using information going beyond the point worksheet
 
Judging After Highly Informative Conversation
Judging After Highly Informative ConversationJudging After Highly Informative Conversation
Judging After Highly Informative Conversation
 
Globalization Pillar Narrative
Globalization Pillar NarrativeGlobalization Pillar Narrative
Globalization Pillar Narrative
 
Generation-X Essay
Generation-X EssayGeneration-X Essay
Generation-X Essay
 
What Is Modding And It Is Important For Many Reasons
What Is Modding And It Is Important For Many ReasonsWhat Is Modding And It Is Important For Many Reasons
What Is Modding And It Is Important For Many Reasons
 
Importance Of College Education Essay
Importance Of College Education EssayImportance Of College Education Essay
Importance Of College Education Essay
 
Out of our mind ken robinson
Out of our mind ken robinsonOut of our mind ken robinson
Out of our mind ken robinson
 
My Philosophy Of Life Essay Pdf. Online assignment writing service.
My Philosophy Of Life Essay Pdf. Online assignment writing service.My Philosophy Of Life Essay Pdf. Online assignment writing service.
My Philosophy Of Life Essay Pdf. Online assignment writing service.
 
Analytical Expository Essay Example
Analytical Expository Essay ExampleAnalytical Expository Essay Example
Analytical Expository Essay Example
 
Need Of Education Essay
Need Of Education EssayNeed Of Education Essay
Need Of Education Essay
 
Scientists as Storytellers Guide
Scientists as Storytellers GuideScientists as Storytellers Guide
Scientists as Storytellers Guide
 
Durban p1 david scott
Durban p1 david scottDurban p1 david scott
Durban p1 david scott
 

Mais de IAU_Past_Conferences (20)

Photo album
Photo albumPhoto album
Photo album
 
Conclusion eva egron polak
Conclusion eva egron polakConclusion eva egron polak
Conclusion eva egron polak
 
Tremblay and Hall
Tremblay and HallTremblay and Hall
Tremblay and Hall
 
Welcome plenary eva egron polak
Welcome plenary eva egron polakWelcome plenary eva egron polak
Welcome plenary eva egron polak
 
Rémi quirion
Rémi quirionRémi quirion
Rémi quirion
 
Sijbolt noorda
Sijbolt noordaSijbolt noorda
Sijbolt noorda
 
Escalante
EscalanteEscalante
Escalante
 
Yves Beauchamp
Yves BeauchampYves Beauchamp
Yves Beauchamp
 
Olive m. Mugenda
Olive m. MugendaOlive m. Mugenda
Olive m. Mugenda
 
Budd l hall
Budd l hallBudd l hall
Budd l hall
 
Ehile
EhileEhile
Ehile
 
Patricia gudino
Patricia gudinoPatricia gudino
Patricia gudino
 
Pam fredman
Pam fredmanPam fredman
Pam fredman
 
Gatica
GaticaGatica
Gatica
 
Mireille mathieu
Mireille mathieuMireille mathieu
Mireille mathieu
 
Francesc xavier grau
Francesc xavier grauFrancesc xavier grau
Francesc xavier grau
 
Louis lévesque
Louis lévesqueLouis lévesque
Louis lévesque
 
Klein
KleinKlein
Klein
 
Dzulkifli
DzulkifliDzulkifli
Dzulkifli
 
Photo album
Photo albumPhoto album
Photo album
 

Concluding Remarks - R. Aragunde

  • 1. Concluding remarks …. Dr. Rafael Aragunde Interamerican University of Puerto Rico I have to start by acknowledging the rich variety of positions presented by the different participants. The invitation to think ourselves under the guise of our relationship to the Global Agenda was answered by a wide diversity of scholars from all parts of the world: Australia and Sweden; Kenya and Pakistan; Brazil and Malaysia; India and Lithuania; UK and Ghana; France and Japan; Israel and Jamaica; Egypt and the USA are a few of the places from which colleagues have flown to Puerto Rico to think and converse about the alternative paths to the future that Higher Education proposes. In the opening session on Tuesday evening we were invited to “think about trends, developments and preoccupations” in higher education, in the words of Juan Ramón de la Fuente. And that’s what was done in the next two days and a half. The morning session on Wednesday was crowned by the visual richness of the world some of us – the very privileged who work in Higher Education institutions - are starting to inhabit. That is the kind of world we would all like to share and yet we know perfectly well that it won’t be easy to achieve. There is no need to insist that there was a train of thought throughout the conference that stressed this alternative path to the future. There are great possibilities of development, many seem to have told us in their own ways, and it’s just a matter of following what science and learning, understood and defined in weberian terms, have to offer. But will this suffice? It hasn’t in the past. What kind of guarantee do we have that that kind of scientific and industrial rationality will do justice to those who share the planet? How often since the Enlightenment, and the period that followed, where many and not only positivists, thought that science and its progress would put an end to injustice, have we read and heard that techno-scientific development will solve all of our problems? But that same Wednesday morning session gave us another alternative pathway to the future. Not only higher education as a public good is now contested in countries where universities have been part of their culture for centuries and soon for a millennium, but also in lands where higher education hasn’t had too many birthdays and where resources that were scarce at times today are being fought over because they are not there anymore. What were many of our colleagues telling us, never losing their smiles and hopes? In fact, at times I thought that they were not telling us enough about their needs. But from what I heard it seems that they don’t need the competition they are getting from all kinds of foreign universities, besides not counting with a state that will support them properly. This alternative path to the future which is being forced on some institutions is obviously much more challenging for they must face, from a weak position, the unpredictable behavior of markets and their irrationality. It would be interesting to know how many agreements were made during these days between those that are representing universities that had a chance to develop with the help of strong national support and no foreign competition and universities that have too much of the later and hardly anything of the former. These are the challenges facing a globalized humanity. Are Higher Education institutions addressing them?, was the first question we had to address. There was an evident consensus in respect to funding and what it means in reality. No higher education institution feels satisfied with what it has or receives. There was a time when in the name of autonomy Faculty resisted what was conveniently thought improper state intervention. Those were the days when
  • 2. research was a thing done in very few universities around the world. Money would come in from the state or as revenue from moderate tuition and there was not much else we would do besides “teaching”. Legislatures didn’t question us. But history has a way of laughing at its inexperienced actors. Anyway, during the conference nobody questioned the assertion that money goes nowadays where politicians and big multinational companies want it to go. That was the unanimous answer given to the second question How and where are current dominant funding models steering higher education and research? But shouldn’t the question have been phrased differently. We should have forced ourselves to think about the possibility of other funding models that don’t include raising student tuition and becoming slaves of capitalism’s latest trend? Because that’s what we have been doing. This question, phrased this way, would have given us the chance to identify alternative paths. Stated as it was, it doesn’t seem to have inspired much thought. But isn’t the need to find new funding models one of the biggest challenges that we are facing, especially in the developing countries where research in general terms is, very often, not a priority. Yet research or whatever we get obsessed with doesn’t need to be a priority, as was clearly suggested by certain panelists, and which takes us to the third alternative path to the future that, we must admit, was not enough dwelled upon. And this third path is not only a very valid answer to that second question, which we would rephrase. It is also a convenient answer to the first one and, if you allow me, to the third question we dealt with, which was: Is globalization setting a new agenda for internationalization of higher education? Nosce te ipsum. Know yourself. Work on your strengths. Get rid of what is not relevant. Why force your Faculty to publish in magazines that don’t add much to what you are, or that nobody reads. Productivity is highly overrated. The most important things in our lives – all experiences - love, health, culture, are all the results of a change of rhythm. Globalization might be a fact, but you don’t need to be obsessive about sending or bringing students and faculty just because everybody is doing it. Internationalization opens up doors, but how many doors can you walk through when you want to get to know a different culture? Once you get to know yourself, be yourself. But be yourself and undertake a project that will reconsider for example the way we compete with each other, as stated yesterday by one of the panelist. We can compete to improve each other, not to beat the other. We must rescue public discourse where we make explicit the values involved in the decisions that are being made. We need a vision of what is success so that its criteria is not defined by performance, management managed by the latest fad, or based on a misunderstanding of scholarship. Our business is knowledge. And we can pursue a knowledge that contributes to a world public culture; that resists manipulative elites; and that makes sure that ethics is not displaced by pergormance. Did we insist enough on this? Concluding, lots of good things are going on in our institutions and what we heard is definitely encouraging. But what fills us with optimism are all those projects that stem out from institutions’ strengths and from a courageous evaluation of what is really taking place in the world. If restructuring is necessary, it should take into account that since neo liberalism spread its wings more than two decades ago we haven’t gotten richer, higher education has lost much of what it once pretended to be and that critical approaches to these realities have gotten scarcer. But then, higher education does posses a huge amounts of creativity. Based on that, we certainly must work on that third path that will respect the different.
  • 3. I cannot end without thanking Eva Egron Polak and our Chancellor Marilyna Wayland and their teams for their efforts. They did organize a very successful and enjoyable meeting. We should also thank President Manuel Fernós for bringing us the 14th. General conference and IAU President Juan Ramón de la Fuente for his support and, aware that I might be breaking with the protocol – why not – I invite everybody to give them a round of applause for a great and unforgettable week that we know took endless days to organize and that has been a real success.