Unbeknownst to some, our Great Lakes national parks play a significant role in the effort to restore the great waters they represent. Each panelist will highlight a GLRI-supported project at a different park: restoring historic wetlands at Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, researching changes in nearshore ecosystem dynamics at Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore, and planning for wetland and stream improvements at Cuyahoga Valley National Park. Discussion will explore how national parks can best contribute to Great Lakes restoration – given their abilities to serve as “living laboratories” and to directly engage the public (i.e., park visitors) through education and volunteerism, and will facilitate a debate on “research vs. on-the-ground restoration” in the context of GLRI funding allocations.
Great Lakes Restoration at National Parks-Tyner, 2012
1. Lake Michigan’s Changing Nearshore: Understanding Type E Avian
Botulism Outbreaks at Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore
Emily Tyner1,2, Brenda Moraska Lafrancois1, Harvey Bootsma2,
Chris Otto2
1. UWM-School of Freshwater Sciences
2. National Park Service-Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore
8. Where are some likely micro-habitats for C. botulinum?
Clostridium cells
and spores (<1
µm size)
At the base
of mussel
aggregates
Sediments below
where At the base of
any of these
pseudofeces mussel/Cladophora
materials
and organic aggregates
substrates
collect
Under mats of
sloughed
Cladophora
Sheridan Haack, USGS Michigan Water Science Center, 2012
Cladophora with marl deposits
9. Botulism outbreaks and environmental conditions
1. Water temperature + hydrodynamics
2. Mussel, round goby, invertebrate counts
14. Benthic Habitat Mapping
• Highlights depositional
areas
– Cladophora Graveyard
– Sleeping Bear Point
• Anoxic Cladophora mats
documented in these
areas
Sleeping Bear Point, 65 ft, Oct 2011
15.
16. Acknowledgements
UWM-Bootsma Lab National Park Service
Harvey Bootsma Brenda Moraska Lafrancois
Ben Turschak Alicia Higham
Erin Wilcox Dan Ray
Lisa DeGuire Chirs Otto
Sue Jennings
Emily Kobernik
Emma Kelly
Chris Johnson
Dave Schroeder
18. BODM Distribution of anoxic areas
BGM
Air temperature Wind Sloughed Cladophora C. botulinum distribution
distribution
TPM
Water temperature Current Cladophora settling Toxin distribution
(velocity, direction)
CGM CDM
Nutrients Cladophora sloughing Carcass distribution
(P, N, O2)
Light Hydrodynamic model Cladophora growth
Bathymetry Cladophora maps
(Depth, lake level)
???
Loons
Dreissenid nutrient inputs
Fish
Pathogens
Lisa Fogarty and Riley
19. animated version low
lake levels
Dreissena Point Sources
Burial,
(now) (historically)
temp unburial
Cladophora
light storms, epiphyte deposits
substrate nutrients currents burden [ON SHORE]
high temps competition
epiphytes
invertebrates
mussels storms,
Cladophora Cladophora Cladophora
seiche
Biomass Peaks senesces sloughs & drifts toxin
epiphytes ↑ DOM ↑ epiphytes
invertebrates↑ Temps Hi Cladophora
invertebrates
Prod:Resp ↓
mussels
deposits
DO ↓ [IN LAKE]
toxin
epiphytes
toxin invertebrates
invasions
mussels Burial,
toxin unburial
Cladophora epiphytes Fish
re-growth invertebrates
mussels
Birds migration
Jun feeding habits
Jun-Jul
(Sep-Oct) Jul-Dec Jul-Dec
NPS (Oct)
Notas do Editor
LMI changing with introduction of invasive speceisnturient depositionStudying botulism issue is one mechanism to see how invasives are changing food web structure, on-ground impacts of invasives
Notice 2007 and 2010 peaks, low water level and warm temperaturesLed season die-off events: storms, Fall peak
Where would c. bot grow
Hypothesis 1a: Toxin produced in sediment after sloughed Cladophora settles.Hypothesis 3. Toxin is transported during resuspension events.
Hypothesis 1e: Toxin produced in Cladophora-mussel bed under certain conditions.