Marel Q1 2024 Investor Presentation from May 8, 2024
Pegram Lecture 1, August 10, 2012
1. The Kyoto Protocol and
The Carbon Cycle
Pegram Lecture 1
Brookhaven National Laboratories, Long Island NY
Graciela Chichilnisky
www.chichilnisky.com
Columbia University
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 1
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
2. What is Globalization?
• A nations‟ economic output is increasingly traded
through the international market
• 3% in 1950‟s USA - about 18% today
• Globalization connects nations and their people
It changes the world economy
2
3. Ratio of merchandise exports to GDP, 1950-2005
(Percentage, real trade and GDP at 1990 prices and exchange rates)
25.0
20.0
Percent
15.0
World Average
10.0
5.0
0.0
1950 1998 2005
Years
Source: World Trade Organization (WTO): World Trade Report.
http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/wtr_arc_e.htm
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 3
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
4. World Exports and GDP, 1950-2005. (Volume indices, 1950=100)
Semi-log scale
10000
Average grow th rates,
1950-2005
5000
Total exports 6.2
Manufactures 7.5
GDP 3.8
2500
Manufactures
Total
1000
GDP
500
250
100
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Source: World Trade Organization (WTO): World Trade Report. http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/wtr_arc_e.htm
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 4
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
5. Globalization and Its Risks
• Globalization is not a new phenomenon
• But has achieved historical proportions
• It is a fact – it is here today
• It has benefits – e.g. gains from trade
• But produces risks – political, economic and for
the world‟s critical resources
• It has deeply increased the Global Divide
5
6. A position on globalization
• Globalization is a global force
• It is here today
• Are you in favor or against the sun rising?
• The issue is what to do with globalization
• How to transform it into a positive force
6
7. A historical first
• Todays‟ globalization breaks with the past
• Where does it come from?
• What are the risks it creates?
• How to benefit from Globalization and how to
avert its main risks?
• How to overcome resource depletion, the global
wealth divide and even extinction of our species?
7
9. Human beings, or their close genetic relatives, have
lived on Earth for several million years
Yet only recently has human activity reached levels
at which it can affect fundamental natural
processes
• the concentration of gases in the
atmosphere (CO2, Ozone)
• the planet’s water mass
• The complex web of species which
constitute life on earth
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 9
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
10. Global risks
• Changes to the planet‟s atmosphere
• Changes to the world‟s water mass
• Changes to the world‟s biodiversity
10
11. Source: Des Marais (2000) “When did Photosysnthesis
emerge on Earth?” Science 289 5485, 1703 – 05.
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 11
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
12. Source: Rice, Patricia R. and Norah Moloney (2005) Biological
anthropology and prehistory: exploring our human ancestry,
Pearson Education: Boston
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 12
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
14. Climate Change a Major Risk
• A risk of survival
• Why focus on that?
• How?
• What to do?
14
15. In 1996, the IPCC reported that
human induced emissions of carbon
have a discernible effect on climate
• Scientific uncertainty persists
• But the risk of climate change is real
and potentially catastrophic
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 15
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
16. Computer models match observed ΔT on all continents
Black lines are decadally averaged observations. Blue bands are computer models
with natural forgings only. Pink bands are computer models with human + natural forgings.
Source: IPCC Working Group 1: The Physical Science
Basis of Climate Change. IPCC 2007: WG1-AR4
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 16
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
17. Source: : Arctic Climate Impact Assessment
(ACIA) 2004
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 17
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
18. Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 18
Source: “In Dead Water” UNEP 2008
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
http://www.unep.org/pdf/InDeadWater_LR.pdf
19. Source: “In Dead Water” UNEP 2008
http://www.unep.org/pdf/InDeadWater_LR.pdf
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 19
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
20. Sea ice is receding
Source: NASA
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 20
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
21. Coastal glaciers are retreating
Muir Glacier, Alaska, 1892-2005
September 1892 August 2005
Source: NSIDC/WDC for Glaciology,
Boulder, compiler. 2002, updated 2006.
Online glacier photograph database.
Boulder, CO: National Snow and Ice Data
Center
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 21
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
22. Greenland Ice Sheet,
2001-2005
Source: Satellite Imaging Corporation,
http://www.satimagingcorp.com/gallery
/aster-greenland-ice-sheet.html
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 22
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
23. Harm is already occurring
Total power released by tropical cyclones (green) has increased along with
sea surface temperatures (blue)
Source: Kerry Emanuel. Anthropogenic Effects
on Tropical Cyclone Activity, 2006.
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 23
http://wind.mit.edu/~emanuel/anthro2.htm (CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
24. Number of flood events by continent and decade since 1950
Source: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/index.aspx
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 24
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
25. Number of major wild fires by continent and decade since 1950
Source: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/index.aspx
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 25
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
26. Where we’re headed: temperate-zone agriculture
Corn and wheat yields versus temperature increase in the temperate zone
averaged across 30 crop modeling studies. All studies assumed a positive
change in precipitation. CO2 direct effects were included in all studies.
Source: Easterling W. E., Apps M. Assessing the consequences of climate change for food and forest
resources: A view from the IPCC, Climatic Change 70 (1-2) 2005 : 165-189.
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 26
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
27. Source: Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being Synthesis.
http://www.millenniumassessment.org/en/index.aspx
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 27
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
29. The smoking gun for
human influence
Top panel shows
best estimates of
human & natural
forcings 1880-2005.
Bottom panel shows
that state-of-the-art
climate model, given
these forcings,
reproduces almost
perfectly the last 125
years of observed
temperatures.
Source: Hansen et al., Science 308, 1431, 2005.
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 29
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
30. 2004
Source: J. Hansen et al., PNAS 103: 14288-293 (26 Sept 2006), updated by NASA Goddard Institute
for Space Studies, GISS Surface Temperature Analysis
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 30
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
31. Rapidly increasing ozone holes
Source: NASA. http://science.hq.nasa.gov/missions/satellite_22.thm
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 31
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
32. How the greenhouse effect works
Source: Sources: Okanagan University collage in Canada, Department of Geography, University of Oxford, school of geography; United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Washington; Climate change 1995, The science of climate change, working group 1 to the second assessment
report of the IPCC, UNEP and WMO, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1996.
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 32
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
33. Source: US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 33
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
34. Composition of greenhouse gases
Source: Sources: Emission Database for Global Atmospheric Research (EDGAR) 3.2 Fast Track 2000. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
www.mnp.nl/edgan/. Accessed 3/21/07
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 34
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
35. International dimensions of
environmental policy
Many environmental problems are global in
scope. Solving them requires international
cooperation
• The planet’s ozone’s layer and CFC’s
emissions
• Loss of biodiversity
• Greenhouse gases and climate change-CO2
emissions
• Acid rain and international transport of SO2
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 35
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
36. • Most of the destruction of the earth’s
ecosystems is driven by economic
incentives
• Forests, where most known
biodiversity resides, are cleared for
the extraction of natural resources
(oil, wood products) or to grow cash
crops and graze livestock
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 36
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
37. Source: Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United
Nations Global Forest
Resources Assessment 2005:
Progress towards sustainable
forest management
37
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
38. Population and the global
environment
The regions with the lowest population
growth are the main cause of global
environmental damage:
●biodiversity loss
●carbon emissions
●CFC emissions (ozone layer)
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 38
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
40. Emissions per capita vs. Population
Source: UN Millennium Report Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 40
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
41. Emissions per capita vs. Population
Population vs. Carbon Emissions per Capita
CO2 Emissions per Capita (Metric Tons of Carbon)
22
20
18
Canada
16
14 Finland
12
10 Germany
8 United Kingdom y = -1.2547Ln(x) + 11.724
R2 = 0.2566
6
4 Mexico China
2 Egypt India
0
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
Population (Billions)
Sources:
UN World Population Prospects: The 2006 Revision;
International Energy Agency 2003
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 41
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
42. Sources: Earthtrends Database of the World
Resource Institute (WRI) http://earthtrends.wri.org/
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 42
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
43. GNI per capita vs. Carbon Emissions per capita
Horizontal axis: GNI/capita
Vertical axis: CO2/capita
Source: UNEP-Building and Climate Change
Report-2007 Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 43
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
44. Total CO2 Emissions (Million Metric Tons)
GDP (2004 Billion $US)
Source: Earthtrends Database of the World Resource
Institute (WRI) http://earthtrends.wri.org/
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 44
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
45. Source: US Energy and Information Administration,
International Energy Annual 2004
Source: US Energy and Information Administration,
International Energy Annual 2009
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 45
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
46. Source: Pimentel, D. et al. (2002). Renewable
energy: Current and potential issues.
BioScience, 52 (12), 1111-1120.
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 46
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
47. Source: US Energy and Information
Administration (EIA) 2004
Source: US Energy and Information
Administration (EIA) 2010
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 47
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
48. Cumulative Emissions (1900-2002): CO2 Emissions (2002) Population (2002)
Source: World Resource Institute Source: World Resource Institute Source: World Resource Institute.
Source Where WRI Got Data: Sources Used by World Resource Institute: Sources where WRI Got Data From:
WRI calculates carbon dioxide emissions from 3 sources
EIA. 2004. International Energy Annual 2002. Available Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social
EIA. 2004. International Energy Annual 2002. Available online online at: http://www.eia.doe.gov/iea/carbon.html. Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat. 2007. World Population
at: http://www.eia.doe.gov/iea/carbon.html. Prospects: The 2006 Revision.
IEA. 2004. CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion (2004
IEA. 2004. CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion (2004 edition). Available online at:
edition). Available online at: http://data.iea.org/ieastore/co2_main.asp.
http://data.iea.org/ieastore/co2_main.asp.
GDP (2002)
Marland, G., T.A. Boden, and R. J. Andres. 2005. Source: World Resource Institute.
Marland, G., T.A. Boden, and R. J. Andres. 2005. Global, Global, Regional, and National Fossil Fuel CO2
Regional, and National Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions. in Trends: Emissions. in Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Source WRI Got Data From:
A Compendium of Data on Global Change. Carbon Dioxide Change. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center,
Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Development Data Group, The World Bank. 2007. 2007
U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., U.S.A. Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., U.S.A. World Development Indicators Online. Washington, DC: The
World Bank
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 48
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
49. In the future:
Most emissions could originate in
developing countries as they
industrialize
• Industrialization is resource intensive
• North-South issues
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 49
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
50. Climate change:
• The causes of climate changes are
economic
• The effects are physical and
biological
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 50
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
51. Since the effects are physical,
economists underestimate them
Since the causes are economic,
physical scientists cannot find
solutions
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 51
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
52. Climate change requires
thinking and acting across social
and physical disciplines
A major challenge
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 52
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
53. Climate change is global
It therefore requires us to focus on:
• Global socioeconomic issues
• Global equity
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 53
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
54. To address these issues we
introduced in 1974 the concept
of development based on the
satisfaction of “basic needs”
The Bariloche Model: “Catastrophe or New Society: A
Latin American World Model” A. Herrera, G. Chichilnisky
et al,1974
It was a response to the Club of Rome “Limits to Growth”
model – D. Meadows, MIT
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 54
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
55. Economic development based on
the satisfaction of basic needs
Basic Needs were introduced to rethink
development patterns, so they would be consistent
with the environmental constraints (Chichilnisky
1974, 1977)
Bariloche Model (1974-76) and sustainability
Bruntland Report, needs and sustainability
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 55
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
56. Sustainable development
• Sustainable Development is anchored on the concept of
Basic Needs voted by 150 nations in 1992 UN Earth
Summit of Rio de Janeiro as the cornestone of efforts to
define Sustainable Development, cf. G. Heal Valuing the
Future 2000.
“Development that meets the needs of the present
without compromising the ability of future generations to
meet their own needs”
Our Common Future, Bruntland Report 1987
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 56
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
57. Global Environmental Policy
Requires Equity and Efficiency
“North South Trade and the Global Environment”, G. Chichilnisky
American Economic Review, 1994
Environmental Markets: Equity and Efficiency, G. Chichilnisky, G.
Heal Kluwer publishers 1998.
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 57
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
58. How did it all happen?
A brief history
of the
Anthropocene
58
59. Scientists find that most of the
damage to biodiversity and the
atmosphere has occurred in the last
60 years
WHY?
What happened 60 years ago?
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 59
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
60. •Emissions of greenhouse gases and
destruction of biodiversity are connected to
the rapid industrialization since World War II
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 60
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
61. History
• After World War II, the U.S. became
40% of the world economy following
the destruction of Germany and
Japan
• Today the U.S. is back to 25%, as it
was before World War II
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 61
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
62. The U.S. pattern of economic
development became a benchmark
• based on rapid industrialization led
by deep and extensive use of natural
resources
• A frontier approach to economics
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 62
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
63. Global institutions were created that
reinforced this vision of resource-intensive
economic development
• The World Bank
• The International Monetary Fund-Bretton Woods
• The United Nations
• The current system of National Accounts
• The American Dream went Global
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 63
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
66. Ratio of merchandise exports to GDP, 1950-2005
(Percentage, real trade and GDP at 1990 prices and exchange rates)
25.0
20.0
Percent
15.0
World Average
10.0
5.0
0.0
1950 1998 2005
Years
Source: World Trade Organization (WTO): World Trade Report.
http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/wtr_arc_e.htm
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 66
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
67. World Exports and GDP, 1950-2005. (Volume indices, 1950=100)
Semi-log scale
10000
Average grow th rates,
1950-2005
5000
Total exports 6.2
Manufactures 7.5
GDP 3.8
2500
Manufactures
Total
1000
GDP
500
250
100
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Source: World Trade Organization (WTO): World Trade Report. http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/wtr_arc_e.htm
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 67
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
68. Growth in the volume of world merchandise trade and GDP, 1996-2006
(Annual percentage change)
12
GDP
Merchandise exports
10
8
Average export
growth 1996-06
6
Average GDP
growth
4 1996-06
2
0
1996 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 2006
-2
Source: World Trade Organization (WTO): World Trade Report. http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/wtr_arc_e.htm
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 68
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
69. GDP per Capita (1990 International Geary-Khamis Dollars)
Year
Source: Angus Maddison, Historical Statistics for the World Economy: 1 – 2006 AD.
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 69
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
70. Source: US EIA 2010
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 70
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
71. Sources: UN FAO 2010 World Roundwood and Sawnwood Total Production
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 71
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
72. Source: Angus Maddison, Historical Statistics for the World Economy: 1 – 2008 AD.
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 72
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
73. Source: US Energy and Information Administration (EIA)
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 73
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
74. GDP per Capita (1990 International Geary-Khamis Dollars)
Year
Source: Angus Maddison, Historical Statistics for the World Economy: 1 – 2006 AD.
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 74
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
75. Source: World Bank (2002 data)
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 75
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
76. Economics drives global change:
• In the North, emission of CO2 is linked to
intensive energy use for production of
goods and services
• In the South, intensive destruction of
ecosystems for agricultural production
and mineral extraction for export
markets
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 76
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
77. Sources: Earthtrends Database of the World
Resource Institute (WRI) http://earthtrends.wri.org/
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 77
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
78. Source: IPPC
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 78
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
79. Cumulative Emissions (1900-2002): CO2 Emissions (2002) Population (2002)
Source: World Resource Institute Source: World Resource Institute Source: World Resource Institute.
Source Where WRI Got Data: Sources Used by World Resource Institute: Sources where WRI Got Data From:
WRI calculates carbon dioxide emissions from 3 sources
EIA. 2004. International Energy Annual 2002. Available Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social
EIA. 2004. International Energy Annual 2002. Available online online at: http://www.eia.doe.gov/iea/carbon.html. Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat. 2007. World Population
at: http://www.eia.doe.gov/iea/carbon.html. Prospects: The 2006 Revision.
IEA. 2004. CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion (2004
IEA. 2004. CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion (2004 edition). Available online at:
edition). Available online at: http://data.iea.org/ieastore/co2_main.asp.
http://data.iea.org/ieastore/co2_main.asp.
GDP (2002)
Marland, G., T.A. Boden, and R. J. Andres. 2005. Source: World Resource Institute.
Marland, G., T.A. Boden, and R. J. Andres. 2005. Global, Global, Regional, and National Fossil Fuel CO2
Regional, and National Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions. in Trends: Emissions. in Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Source WRI Got Data From:
A Compendium of Data on Global Change. Carbon Dioxide Change. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center,
Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Development Data Group, The World Bank. 2007. 2007
U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., U.S.A. Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., U.S.A. World Development Indicators Online. Washington, DC: The
World Bank
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 79
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
80. DISTRIBUTION OF TROPICAL FORESTS
Source: Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations
Source: www.marietta.edu
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 80
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
81. HOLDRIDGE LIFE ZONE CLASSIFICATION
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 81
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
82. The North Produces Most Risks
• Most CO2 emissions
• Most CFC emissions
• Most biodiversity destruction
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 82
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
83. The South suffers most of the
effects. It is most vulnerable to the
effects of climate change on:
• food production
• living conditions
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 83
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
84. The North produces most risks
The South bears them most
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 84
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
85. The origins of today’s environmental
dilemmas involve the historical coupling
of two different worlds through the
international market: the industrialized
and the developing regions, the North
and the South
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 85
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
86. •The globalization of the world economy
since World War II has intensified a
pattern of resource use by which
developing nations extract most natural
resources, exporting them to
industrialized nations at prices that are
often below replacement cost
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 86
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
87. Source: World Bank 2004 data
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 87
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
88. Source: World Trade Organization (WTO) 2005 data
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 88
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
89. Source: Dani Rodrik. “Sea Changes in the World Economy.” Paper prepared for the Techint
conference, Buenos Aires, August 30, 2005
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 89
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
90. Ratio of merchandise exports to GDP, 1950-2005
(Percentage, real trade and GDP at 1990 prices and exchange rates)
25.0
20.0
Percent
15.0
World Average
10.0
5.0
0.0
1950 1998 2005
Years
Source: World Trade Organization (WTO): World Trade Report.
http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/wtr_arc_e.htm
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 90
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
91. World Exports and GDP, 1950-2005. (Volume indices, 1950=100)
Semi-log scale
10000
Average grow th rates,
1950-2005
5000
Total exports 6.2
Manufactures 7.5
GDP 3.8
2500
Manufactures
Total
1000
GDP
500
250
100
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Source: World Trade Organization (WTO): World Trade Report. http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/wtr_arc_e.htm
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 91
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
92. Growth in the volume of world merchandise trade and GDP, 1996-2006
(Annual percentage change)
12
GDP
Merchandise exports
10
8
Average export
growth 1996-06
6
Average GDP
growth
4 1996-06
2
0
1996 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 2006
-2
Source: World Trade Organization (WTO): World Trade Report. http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/wtr_arc_e.htm
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 92
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
93. Through the international market,
industrial nations, housing 20% of
the world population:
• Consume most forest products (pulp,
wood)
• Consume most products produced
through the clearing of forests (cash
crops, livestock)
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 93
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
94. The North’s economy represents the
main driving force:
• Has used, and continues to use,
most of the global resources and
environment,
• Produces 60% of all CO2 emissions,
• Consumes most forest and mineral
products,
• Emits most CFCs
Source: WRI
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 94
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
95. ■The South, with 80% of the world’s
population, extracts and exports most
resources, which are mostly consumed in
the North.
■Resources – such as petroleum and wood
– are traded at prices which are below real
costs, leading to increased dependence on
resource use and to a deepening North-
South divide
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 95
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
96. Source: Baker, E, Bournay, E, Harayama, A, & Rekacewicz, P (2004). Vital Waste Graphics. UNEP/DEWA/GRID-Europe,
RetrievedJan. 24, 2009, from http://www.grida.no/_res/site/file/publications/vital-waste/wastereport-full.pdf
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 96
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
97. GREENHOUSE INDEX: COUNTRIES WITH HIGHEST
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS, 2004
Source: CAIT
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 97
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
98. Total Exports
Exports of Raw
Materials
Source: World Trade Organization (WTO). World Trade Overview 2005.
http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/its2006_e/its06_overview_e.pdf
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 98
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
101. The UN Food and Agriculture
Organization (FAO) has estimated that
direct emissions from meat production
account for about 20% of the world's
total greenhouse gas emissions
Exceeding emissions from the world’s
entire transportation system
•
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 101
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
102. GDP per Capita (1990 International Geary-Khamis Dollars)
Year
Source: Angus Maddison, Historical Statistics for the World Economy: 1 – 2006 AD.
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 102
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
103. The U.S. uses 24.3% of the
world’s oil output yearly, even
though it has about 4% of the
world’s population
SOURCE: CIA World Factbook, December 2008
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 103
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
104. It is not how much you export but what you export
Note: “income content of exports” (EXPY) represents the income level of the typical
country with your export basket. Source: World Trade Organization (WTO). World Trade
Overview 2005. http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/its2006_e/its06_overview_e.pdf
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 104
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
105. Source: World Trade Organization (WTO). World Trade Overview 2005.
http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/its2006_e/its06_overview_e.pdf
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 105
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
106. The remarkable rise of China
Source: Dani Rodrik. “Sea Changes in the World Economy.” Paper prepared for the Techint
conference, Buenos Aires, August 30, 2005
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 106
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
107. The remarkable rise of China
Source: Dani Rodrik, op.cit. 2005
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 107
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
108. Source: United Nations Comtrade Database for Oil Export Data. http://comtrade.un.org/pb/CountryPages.aspx?y=2007.
World Bank for GDP data
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 108
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
109. Source: United Nations Comtrade Database for Oil Export Data. http://comtrade.un.org/pb/CountryPages.aspx?y=2007.
World Bank for GDP data
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 109
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
111. Pattern of World Trade
• Since WWI, world trade became the exports of
manufactured and capital intensive products from
the North against raw materials mostly exported
by the South
• Previously imposed through colonialism, this
pattern became entrenched through „market
colonialism‟ after the liberation movements of the
mid 20th century
• „Export led growth‟
• An illusory theory of comparative advantages 111
112. Why did this happen?
• The economics of North-South Trade
• Its impact on the Global Environment
• G. Chichilnisky “North South Trade and the Global Environment”
AER 1994
112
113. This pattern of trade after WWII can
be explained in substantial measure
by a historical difference in property
rights in the developing and
industrial worlds
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 113
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
114. Developing countries hold most
resources as common property
while in industrial economies
these are usually private
property
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 114
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
115. Natural resources, such as forests and
mineral resources are often held as
common property in developing
countries. They are often used on a
“first come first served” basis in an open
access process
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 115
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
116. Source: World Trade Organization (WTO). World Trade Overview 2005.
http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/its2006_e/its06_overview_e.pdf
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 116
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
117. In a world where agricultural societies
trade with industrial societies,
international markets magnify the
extraction of resources. The result is
that exports and world use of natural
resources exceed what is optimal
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 117
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
118. The resulting agricultural output
is mostly sold in international
markets (pulp and wood, cash
crops, livestock, Barbier)
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 118
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
119. Differences in property rights
explain:
• The South’s over-extraction of
natural resources for the
international market
• Why the South sells natural
resources below real cost
Chichilnisky, American Economic Review, 1994
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 119
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
122. Source: World Trade of IT products by region 2005, Source Comtrade database and WTO. Exports and Imports,
This Chart appears on Page 17, World Trade Report 2007 WTO
http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/anrep_e/world_trade_report07_e.pdf
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 122
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
123. Note: The graph corresponds to the regression system in Table 3, column 2 (next slide). The curve shows the partial relation
between the Gini coefficient and the log of per capita GDP, holding fixed the estimated effects of the explanatory variables
other than the log of per capita GDP and its square. Source: Robert Barro. Inequality and Growth Revisted. ADB January
2008. http://aric.adb.org/pdf/workingpaper/WP11_%20Inequality_and_Growth_Revisited.pdf
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 123
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
124. Source: Robert Barro.
Op.cit. 2008.
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 124
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
125. Source: World Trade Organization (WTO). World Trade Overview.
http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/its2006_e/its06_overview_e.pdf
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 125
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
126. Note: GNNP (Green Net National Product) is GNP minus the damage from carbon dioxide emissions, depreciation of produced
assets and depletion of forests and subsoil assets. Source: “When Self Interest is Key to a Better Environment.” Nature. Volume 395.
October 1998. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v395/n6701/pdf/395428a0.pdf
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 126
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
127. Without computing the “replacement
costs” of extraction, there is a false
impression of resource abundance
and comparative advantage leading
to a global version of the “tragedy of
the commons”
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 127
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
128. Note: GNNP (Green Net National Product) is GNP minus the damage from carbon dioxide emissions, depreciation of produced
assets and depletion of forests and subsoil assets. Source: “When Self Interest is Key to a Better Environment.” Nature. Volume 395.
October 1998. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v395/n6701/pdf/395428a0.pdf
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 128
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
129. Source: Development Data Group, The World Bank. 2008. 2008 World Development Indicators
Online. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Available at: http://go.worldbank.org/U0FSM7AQ40.
And World Trade Organization (WTO). World Trade Overview.
http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/its2006_e/its06_overview_e.pdf
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 129
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
131. Barrels of Oil (Billions)
Source: Energy Information Administration. August 27, 2008. http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/international/oilreserves.html
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 131
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
132. Growth in the volume of world merchandise trade and GDP, 1996-2006
(Annual percentage change)
12
GDP
Merchandise exports
10
8
Average export
growth 1996-06
6
Average GDP
growth
4 1996-06
2
0
1996 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 2006
-2
Source: World Trade Organization (WTO): World Trade Report. http://www.wto.org/english/res_e/reser_e/wtr_arc_e.htm
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 132
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
133. Source: World Trade Organization (WTO) 2005 data
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 133
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
134. Source: International Monetary Fund (IMF). World Economic Outlook 2008.
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2008/01/index.htm#ch1fig
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 134
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
135. Source: Alan Thein Durning. “How Much is Enough?” The Worldwatch Environmental Alert Series. 1992
http://www.ncseonline.org/PopPlanet/ePopulationReports/rest/abstracts/148954.pdf
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 135
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
136. Source: Baker, E. et al. (2004). Vital Waste Graphics. UNEP/DEWA/GRID-Europe, Retrieved Jan. 24, 2009, from
http://www.grida.no/_res/site/file/publications/vital-waste/wastereport-full.pdf.
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 136
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
137. Source: US Energy and Information Administration (EIA) 2004 Data
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 137
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
138. Source: International Monetary Fund (IMF). World Economic Outlook 2008.
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2008/01/index.htm#ch1fig
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 138
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
139. As a result of this trade pattern
the North over-consumes
resources, and the South over-
extracts them
Chichilnisky, American Economic Review, 1994
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 139
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
140. As a consequence of these
historical facts, the Earth
Resources are undervalued in
international markets
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 140
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
141. Because most resource-
intensive exports come from
developing nations, their own
economies and people are
undervalued in economic terms
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 141
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
142. Resource intensive trade leads
to an increasingly divided North-
South world
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 142
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
143. GDP per Capita (1990 International Geary-Khamis Dollars)
Year
Source: Angus Maddison, Historical Statistics for the World Economy: 1 – 2006 AD.
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 143
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
144. Privatizing resources in
developing countries may be
impractical in any reasonable
time scale.
An alternative is to privatize the
global commons.
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 144
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
145. Rather than privatizing forest
and mineral deposits “on the
ground”, we can privatize and
trade the rights to use the
atmosphere as a carbon sink,
and the use of biodiversity
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 145
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
147. The Kyoto Protocol
• Signed by 160 nations in 1997 – including USA
• International Law since 2005
• First international agreement based on a new global
market: for trading the rights to use the world‟s
atmosphere
• The United Nations voted to extend its limits in COP 17
Durban December 2011 until 2015
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 147
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
148. New Economic Findings
from the UN Carbon Market
• Efficiency in trading permits requires
more emission rights to developing
countries
• Why?
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 148
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
149. Typically efficiency requires that
those with fewer endowments of
private goods should have a
higher allocation of property
rights on the public goods
■Chichilnisky, 1992-3
■Chichilnisky and Heal, 1993
■Chichilnisky, Heal and Starrett, 1993-4
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 149
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
150. Kyoto Protocol:
The way ahead
• How to develop incentives for international
cooperation?
• How to obtain support from the private
sector?
• Will the three flexibility mechanisms be
unified
• How to regulate private sector emission
traders?
• How to achieve equitable markets?
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 150
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
151. The World needs more Energy
• The developing nations need energy
• Most of all energy increase (doubling today‟s use
by 2030) expected to come from developing
nations (IEA)
• But today power plants are 45% of the global
emissions of CO2
• How to resolve this cruel dilemma?
151
152. The clean development mechanism of the
Kyoto Protocol has already transferred
$50Bn to poor nations for private projects
decreasing carbon emissions – The World Bank
“Trends and Facts of the Carbon Market” 2011
The CDM must be extended to Carbon
Negative projects to allow funds for Latin
America, Africa and AOSIS –
Why?
And How?
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 152
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net
153. The next lectures will address
these issues and the rays of
hope for a solution
Columbia Consortium for Risk Management 153
(CCRM) www.columbiariskmanagement.net