Governance in disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation: a pan European perspective
1. CCA AND DRR IN EUROPE
: A Review On
Governance
3rd Global Risk Forum,
Davos, 2012
Francesc PLA
1
2. CCA & DRR: common agenda?
Climate Change Disaster Risk
CC has been addressed through DR has been addressed through
mitigation as source is considered response as source is considered
human non-human
Focus on hydrometereological Includes other hazards
3rd Global Risk Forum,
Davos, 2012
hazards and deal with long term (geomorphological, technological)
issues (greater uncertainty) and focus on short term issues
Move towards prepareness (less uncertainty)
(includes irreversibility and short Move towards prepareness
term) (includes human behaviour and
long term)
Common goal: reduce societies’ vulnerability to threats.
Such convergence justifies a coordinated approach 2
covering both short and long term planning for both.
3. Governance versus Management
Management Governance
Allocation of resources and oversee Strategic task of setting the
of the day-to-day operations of the organisation's goals, direction,
organisation : “How” the limitations and accountability
organisation will reach those goals frameworks : "What" the
and aspirations. organisation does and what it
3rd Global Risk Forum,
Davos, 2012
More technical/operational. should become in the future
More political/strategical.
3
4. Goals and methodology of the
report
http://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/publications/20591
Jointly commissioned with UNISDR Europe
to Global Climate Adaptation Partnership
•Goals
3rd Global Risk Forum,
Davos, 2012
Explore major governance issues within both fields in Europe
Identify interaction between CCA and DRR in Europe
•Methodology
Analysis of existing joint mechanisms at European level
Interviews with key actors in both fields
•Specificity of European region
Existence of common legislation/directives , common research
programmes and common financing instruments 4
5. On networks and communication
• Main drawbacks
Divergent approaches of researchers and policy makers
Lack of information sharing between entities
Insufficient links between researchers on CCA and DRR
3rd Global Risk Forum,
Davos, 2012
• Key recommendations
Greater involvement of policy makers in project design
New exchange opportunities between research and policy
Necessary broker in the areas of CCA and DRR
• Suggested steps forward
Reinforce policy evaluation of projects by science adviser
Focused workshops with researchers and policy makers 5
Use existing IOs events and tools to link CCA and DRR
6. On capacity building
• Main drawbacks
Lack of common ground to develop common ideas
Insufficient communication skills of researchers
Absence of specific communication budget in projects
3rd Global Risk Forum,
Davos, 2012
• Key recommendations
Develop common approach researchers/policy makers
Facilitate better communication practices
Support projects who include adequate communication
• Suggested steps forward
Organization of capacity building workshops
Adequate educational curricula for universities
Include specific communication goals in projects 6
7. On joint projects and programmes
• Main drawbacks
No links between various domains of study
Inaccuracy due to specific disciplinary approaches
Declining resources due to financial situation
3rd Global Risk Forum,
Davos, 2012
• Key recommendations
Develop JPs as they are more cost-effective
Identify synergies for joint processes and procedures
Search alternative resources to foster joint projects
• Suggested steps forward
Coordination between evaluators of related projects
Joint review of Cancun Adaptation Framework and HFA
Donors based identification of critical issues 7
8. On information flow
• Main drawbacks
Limited accessibility to pertinent data
Conclusions of research little focused for policy makers
Linguistic barrier to pertinent documents
3rd Global Risk Forum,
Davos, 2012
• Key recommendations
Reinforce clearinghouse mechanisms
Collect more local level data to identify clear actions
Spread more widely key documents among final users
• Suggested steps forward
Disseminate already existing survey reports
Support community based DRR interventions
Develop linguistic versions of key documents 8
9. On national actions’ role
• Main drawbacks
Little contact between entities in charge of CCA and DDR
Remaining gaps between policy and stakeholders
Excessive focus on purely national threats
3rd Global Risk Forum,
Davos, 2012
• Key recommendations
Promote collaboration across ministries and sectors
Develop partnerships between government and others
Share experiences on CCA and DRR with other countries
• Suggested steps forward
NPs interface between policy entities and with research
Involvement of NPs in national research projects
Active participation of NPs in thematic group of EFDDR 9
10. Follow-up: lessons from CC
National Adaptation Plans
• Need to study national governance
Actual policies are mainly national/regional/local
Explore issues already addressed in National Adaptation Plans
Identify gaps yet to fill
3rd Global Risk Forum,
Davos, 2012
• Survey of actual situation
Analyse the existing strategies at national level
Compare national situations to identify good practices
• Study launched by the European Forum for DRR
10
11. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION !
3rd Global Platform,
Geneva, 2011
WWW.COE.INT/EUROPARISKS/ 11