The document describes a computer software program for semi-automated diagnosis of urodynamic studies. It outlines the rationale for developing the software to minimize incorrect diagnoses and improve standardization. The software utilizes published guidelines and literature on urodynamic terminology, techniques, tracing interpretation and diagnosis of lower urinary tract conditions. Validation studies of the software's accuracy are still underway.

1. UDS ASSISTANT A Software for Urodynamic Semi-Automated Diagnosis

5. Algorithms Sources -II

6. Display

7. Single vs multichannel UDS

8. Quality control procedure before Pressure/Flow study

9. Neurogenic patient

10. Final report ( neurogenic patient )

11. Algorithms Rationale

12. Flowmetry Analysis Siroky - male < 50 yrs Bristol - male > 50 yrs Liverpool - female

19. Urethral function tests

21. Pressure Transmission Rate

34. UDS ASSISTANT Clinical Samples

44. Hypermobility vs ISD:from dychotomy to continuum

46. Compliance Analysis

47. Laborie UDS Trainer Derek Griffiths ICS 2007

48. UDS-ASSISTANT A Software for Urodynamic Automated Diagnosis

53. Software Sources

54. Software Sources

55. Software Sources

58. Display Sample

59. Display Sample

61. Siroky Nomogram Male < 50 yrs

62. Bristol Nomogram Male > 50 yrs

63. Liverpool Nomogram Female

65. Display Sample

66. Cistometry Display

67. Diagnosis

68. Urethral Function Analysis

69. Male Pressure / Flow Display

70. Female Pressure / Flow Display

71. Display Sample

72. Neurologic Patient Display

73. Clinical Examples

75. Case 2 : 72 y.o. women.Mixed incontinence. Previous hysterectomy & ant. and post. repair. TVT failed

76. Case 4 :62 y.o. man with urgency,frequency,nocturia