This document discusses the potential for increasing wheat production in sub-Saharan Africa to reduce dependence on imports and meet growing demand. It finds that many countries have suitable agro-ecologies for competitive wheat production. However, constraints include perceptions that wheat is not suitable for Africa, lack of farmer awareness, subsidized imports, lack of mechanization and research capacity. The document calls for a paradigm shift in policies to recognize opportunities, pilot projects to identify suitable varieties, and addressing knowledge gaps such as detailed profitability studies and constraints to smallholder wheat production.
5S - House keeping (Seiri, Seiton, Seiso, Seiketsu, Shitsuke)
Harnessing Wheat Opportunities for Food Security in Africa
1. Wheat for Africa: Potentials
and Challenges for Harnessing
Opportunities
Bekele Shiferaw, Jawoo Koo; Victor
Kommerell, Wilfred Mwangi, Hans J Braun,
Bekele Abeyo, Thomas Payne
http://wheat.org/
CRP Wheat contact: Victor Kommerell, Program Manager:
v.kommerell@cgiar.org
Wheat for Africa study: Bekele Shiferaw
b.shiferaw@cgiar.org
Africa Agriculture Science
Week 2013
2. Outline
1. Making the case for Wheat for Africa (W4A)
• Context: CAADP-CGIAR dialogue, W4A Conference
• Widening gap and challenges to food security
2. Can SS Africa produce some of its requirements to
reduce dependence on imports?
3. How large is the potential and what are the key
challenges?
4. What’s needed now: National/regional
commitments & W4A investment options for
international donors
5. Proposed entry points and call for action
3. Context: CAADP-CGIAR Dialogue
Dublin Process: Greater
connectivity and focus between
CAADP and the CGIAR Research
Programs
Formulation of an African owned
and led Science Agenda for
African Agriculture
Seek joint funding for priority
programs
CGIAR-CAADP MoU signed in Jan
2013
CAADP Partnership Platform W4A
side event 25-26 March 2013
Aligning continental, national and international agricultural research for dev
4. The Case for W4A: African Researchers and
Policymakers say Yes!
2006: Abuja Food Security Summit defines African strategic
crops – but wheat not among them
Oct ‘11: CRP Wheat MC opts for regional stakeholder
meeting in Africa in 2012
Ethiopian MoA/EIAR, AUC & CGIAR Centers behind CRP
Wheat (CIMMYT, ICARDA, IFPRI) decide to go for Pan-
African wheat science and policy conference
Oct ‘12: Wheat for Food Security in Africa Conference ends
with Declaration: Wheat is a strategic crop for Africa!
End Nov ‘12: JMCAT (African Union Joint Ministerial
Conference of MoA and Trade) endorses the Declaration
What next?
6. Wheat Production, demand and imports
Region Total
production
million
tons)
Total
consumpti
on (million
tons)
Per capita
production
(kg/year)
Per capita
consump-
tion (kg/
year)
Quantity of
import
(million
tons)
Value of
import
(billion
dollars)
Wheat self-
sufficiency
(%)
Eastern
Africa
3.62 7.9 11.2 26.2 4.8 1.6 39.8
Central
Africa
0.02 1.4 0.2 11.6 0.9 0.3 0.6
West
Africa
0.09 5.9 0.3 19.6 5.4 1.8 1.2
Northern
Africa
17.69 34.2 84.6 168.4 23 8 50.7
Southern
Africa
1.83 3.5 31.6 62 1.6 0.6 57.5
SS Africa 5.55 20.4 6.9 24.9 12.7 4.8 29
Africa 23.24 52.9 22.8 53.8 35.7 12.3 40.2
7. Average annual total wheat demand
growth rates (%)
Region 1961-
1970
1971 -
1980
1981 -
1990
1991 -
2000
2001 -
2009
1961 -
2009
E&S Africa with RSA 5.12 3.19 3.34 3.76 5.79 4.19
E&S Africa without RSA 6.29 3.44 3.87 4.36 7.63 5.04
Western & Central Africa 9.44 11.45 -0.62 9.93 4.74 6.98
North Africa 3.60 6.08 3.45 1.29 2.20 3.34
Developing countries 5.34 5.28 3.09 2.74 1.37 3.57
Developed countries 4.01 1.21 1.79 -1.71 0.69 1.15
World 4.47 2.84 2.37 0.61 1.03 2.24
12. Feasibility study
1. How large is the potential?
Assess to what extent domestic
wheat production in SS Africa
would be economically
profitable and competitive to
imports.
2. Constraints for harnessing
the potential for import
substitution
3. Policy implications for
African governments on
strategic role of wheat
13. Computation of net economic return (NER) for
estimating import competitiveness
The NER computed at the pixel level:
NER=P*Y-TVC
Where
P*Y is the gross farm return (US$/ha);
P is the pixel level adjusted IPP (import parity price) for wheat
(US$/kg);
Y is the adjusted pixel level simulated wheat yield
(kg/ha), adjusted downward by 10%
TVC is the pixel level variable cost (US$/ha) including import parity
fertilizer costs and interest on working capital
23. Constraints to wheat in SS Africa
• Perception that wheat is not for SS Africa: cannot
competitively produce wheat (under-funded and under-
invested crop)
• Imperfect information and inadequate awareness by
farmers and policy makers
• Subsidized and cheap imports that undermine domestic
production
• Cultural and social factors – lack of prior experience by
smallholder farmers
• Lack of mechanization – production, harvesting, threshing
• Lack of capacity - research, production and value chain
development
24. Conclusions
• Strong emerging evidence of large underutilized potential for
economically profitable wheat production to meet the
growing consumption demand
• Variable potential - many countries (but not all) have suitable
agro-ecologies for competitive wheat production
• Results are generally robust to plausible shocks
– Low world prices of wheat and high fertilizer costs will reduce
the relative competitiveness of domestic production
– Investment in R&D to increase yields and to reduce domestic
production and marketing costs will increase it
• The limiting factors for wheat in Africa seem to be less of
agro-ecological and more of socio-cultural, institutional and
policy impediments.
26. Outline
1. What’s needed now: National/regional
commitments & W4A investment options for
international donors
2. Knowledge gaps
3. Current investments
4. Entry points
5. Proposed next steps and call for action
27. What Africa needs now to harness this
potential?
• Paradigm shift – policy dialogue and conversation on
potential opportunities (rainfed/irrigated)
• Action plan will vary by country/region
– Assess current limiting constraints in farming systems and
market access challenges
– Tradeoffs and synergies with other crops grown by farmers
– Crop-livestock integration and rotation with legumes
– Strategy for small vs. medium and large scale farmers
– Combine intensification and extensification options
• Pilot projects and adaptive research to identify suitable
and market preferred varieties in different agro-ecologies
28. Knowledge gaps
1. Detailed wheat profitability potential studies (rain-fed and irrigated),
beyond modelling-based projections developed in 2012
2. Understand constraints to smallholder wheat production -
mechanization, markets, cultural, policy, etc
3. Investigate wheat-related trade/value chain obstacles & opportunities
at regional level: Baseline for developing African common market for
wheat & other food commodities
4. Wheat consumption trends in Africa (who, where, why) & projections
5. Address complex Agri-R4D challenges: Continental germplasm
exchange, multi-country/agro-eco zone breeding platforms, biomass
(ecological intensification, wheat alternative uses/livestock trade-offs)
6. Develop integrated wheat systems technologies for high potential
countries/regions
7. Investigate African wheat imports net winners and losers
29. Current W4A projects – good start
but far from requirements
29
Annual wheat improvement training
courses (CIMMYT); SARD-SC/Wheat
(ICARDA-led); Rust-related capacity
development (DRRW)
SARD-SC/Wheat, started 2013, 3 hubs with 12
SSA countries: agronomy ‘packages’; CD Seed on
mechanisation (Ethiopia, BMZ); FACASI on small-
scale mechanisation, starts 2013 (Ethiopia ;
ACIAR); ATA (83 Ethiopian districts with easy reach
wheat potential)
Accelerated variety release
(Ethiopia, USAID)
IWIN (WHEAT); EAPP (East
Africa, regional adaptation
trials); SARD-SC/Wheat
Durable Rust Resistance
Wheat project
(DRRW/BGRI)
30. Opportunities for increasing
production
• Evaluate alternative strategies for expansion
– Land surplus economies. e.g.
Mozambique, Zambia, Angola, Zimbabwe, Madagascar and Tanzania.
complementary investments in roads, irrigation, storage and
marketing systems.
– Land constrained economies: Limited expansion of wheat into new
areas for commercial production may be possible e.g. areas with good
market access, e.g. densely populated highland regions of
Rwanda, Burundi, Kenya, Ethiopia and parts of Tanzania and Uganda
consider integrating wheat into existing faming systems without
necessarily crowding out other profitable crops.
• Both smallholder and large-scale commercial
production
• Rainfed and irrigated systems
31. Proposed action plan: key entry points
Target region/typology Key challenges and investment priorities Potential donors
1. Countries where
smallholder production exists
- Integrated interventions
for improving productivity
and sustainability (e.g.
Ethiopia, Tanzania, Burundi,
Rwanda, Burundi)
• Close yield gap
• Improve service delivery (extens, credit, storage,
etc)
• Seed delivery, agronomy, intensification and
systems
• Enhance value chains and profitability of wheat
• Marketing, quality and processing
GoV, BMGF, AfDB,
CIDA, SIDA, DIFID,
IFAD, USAID, etc
2. Countries with potential
but limited smallholder
production – Test and validate
competitiveness of wheat (e.g.
Zambia, Zimbabwe, Kenya, Angola,
Malawi, Mozambique, etc.)
• On-farm trials with varieties, agronomy, etc
• Test competitiveness: Generate actual on-farm and
value chain data to see the case for competitiveness
with imports and other crops
• Policy recommendations on smallholder wheat
systems in Africa
GoV, BMGF, AfDB, etc
3. Integrated innovations and
investments for exploiting
irrigated systems (e.g. Nigeria,
Zambia, Sudan, Zimbabwe, Mali,
etc.)
• Overcoming soil salinity, heat tolerance, land
degradation, sustainable productivity growth
• Enhance value chains and profitability of wheat
• Marketing, quality and processing
Nigeria, Sudan,
Zambia, AfDB, BMZ,
etc
32. Concrete next steps (our ideas)
1. Consider wheat in the CAADP National Agricultural Investment
Plans
2. Build on the AfDB funded SARD-SC project to validate potentials
and build the proof of concept in selected target countries
3. Initiate dialogue with development investors and stakeholders on
strategies for reducing import dependence
4. Regional platforms for data collection:
– Gather high quality data and share with governments and development
investors
– Regional phenotyping platform: 2 – 3 locations in Africa to observe
yield and heat & drought tolerance
5. Establish Partnership for Wheat Development in Africa (W4AC) –
continental platform for spearheading the advocacy and
implementation of the W4A strategy.
33. Thank you for your
attention! Your questions
and comments, please
http://wheat.org/
Victor Kommerell, CRP Program
Manager: v.kommerell@cgiar.org
Africa Agriculture Science
Week 2013
34. Production and degree of self-sufficiency for wheat
in Africa (2008 - 2010)
Country Area (1000 ha) Production (1000
tons)
Self-sufficiency (%)
Morocco 2,896.0 5,005.7 60.71
Algeria 1,585.1 2,388.1 29.33
Ethiopia 1,520.7 2,725.4 64.33
Egypt 1,283.2 7,889.7 45.78
South Africa 649.5 1,839.3 59.50
Tunisia 585.2 1,131.6 40.93
Sudan 308.8 543.9 25.38
Kenya 140.6 356.0 40.12
Libya 133.3 105.0 6.71
Tanzania 49.0 92.9 11.00
Rwanda 48.1 72.5 73.01
Nigeria 34.7 51.3 1.40
Others 141.8 340.9 5.24
Africa 9,376.0 22,542.3 40.2
35. Annex: Sources of wheat imports – SSA big 5 (2000-10)
Source: FAOSTAT Trade database
Importing country
Share of total imports from source country
Source country Ethiopia Kenya Nigeria RSA Sudan All 5
Argentina 0.0% 22.3% 8.9% 31.2% 5.4% 15.0%
Australia 1.0% 6.6% 0.7% 9.1% 44.6% 7.8%
Belgium 0.0% 0.1% 13.1% 0.0% 0.0% 4.0%
Bulgaria 8.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.5%
Canada 2.3% 2.4% 1.3% 8.0% 25.7% 5.5%
Germany 0.7% 2.5% 0.3% 22.0% 0.0% 6.4%
Italy 20.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.8% 3.8%
Pakistan 0.0% 6.1% 0.0% 0.0% 2.6% 1.2%
Russian
Federation
0.9% 16.9% 0.8% 0.3% 0.4% 3.3%
Ukraine 4.4% 18.7% 0.0% 2.1% 0.0% 4.4%
USA 48.9% 7.7% 57.9% 20.6% 6.0% 33.8%
Other countries 13.6% 16.4% 17.0% 6.7% 14.5% 13.3%
TOTAL 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
36. Wheat becoming #1 staple in many places
36
Lusaka, Zambia – 2007/08
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
1 2 3 4 5 Total
%ofwheat+maize+riceexpenditures
Consump on quin le
Wheat
Maize
Rice
Source: Mason & Jayne (2009)
Similar patterns:
Kitwe, Zambia
Nairobi, Kenya
Maputo, Mozambique
37. Growth rates in per capita wheat
consumption (%)
Region
1961 -
1970
1971 -
1980
1981 -
1990
1991 -
2000
2000 -
2009
1961 -
2009
E&S Africa with RSA 2.45 0.69 0.62 1.29 1.63 1.31
E&S Africa without
RSA
3.65 0.90 0.84 1.76 2.64 1.91
Western and Central
Africa
6.81 8.45 -3.27 6.97 2.02 4.19
North Africa 1.11 3.60 0.62 -0.57 0.50 1.06
Developing countries 3.13 3.31 1.02 0.64 -0.33 1.56
Developed countries -0.70 -0.37 0.16 -0.58 -0.21 -0.33
World 0.49 1.28 0.49 0.04 -0.38 0.40
38. Average annual total wheat demand
growth rates (%)
Region 1961-
1970
1971 -
1980
1981 -
1990
1991 -
2000
2001 -
2009
1961 -
2009
E&S Africa with RSA 5.12 3.19 3.34 3.76 5.79 4.19
E&S Africa without RSA 6.29 3.44 3.87 4.36 7.63 5.04
Western & Central Africa 9.44 11.45 -0.62 9.93 4.74 6.98
North Africa 3.60 6.08 3.45 1.29 2.20 3.34
Developing countries 5.34 5.28 3.09 2.74 1.37 3.57
Developed countries 4.01 1.21 1.79 -1.71 0.69 1.15
World 4.47 2.84 2.37 0.61 1.03 2.24
39. Drivers of growing demand
• Population growth
• Income growth
• Urbanization
• Female employment and opportunity
cost of time
• Declining international prices relative
to other staples
• Globalization and changing lifestyles
Notas do Editor
Briefly explain how SI’s interact, mutually reinforce ..Investment in 80s wheat/Africa was higherNot fully comprehensive overview – some N.Africa-related R4D projects missingSee major gaps: Little on wheat-based systems, nothing on precision agriculture (SI3), heat & drought etc.
-Wheat not yet dominant staple in SSA overall or any of its regions but …