SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 14
Download to read offline
Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K.
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
1
Mid-Pacific Institute 1:1 iPad Program
Personalization vs. Differentiation vs. Individualization Report (v2)
by Barbara Bray and Kathleen McClaskey
Co-Founders of Personalize Learning, LLC
www.personalizelearning.com
“The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education.”
Albert Einstein
Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K.
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
2
Personalization vs. Differentiation vs. Individualization Report (V2)
by Barbara Bray and Kathleen McClaskey, Co-Founders of Personalize Learning, LLC
There is a difference between personalization, differentiation and individualization. The
first is learner-centered; the others are teacher-centered. There seems to be confusion
in the education world about the differences and comparisons of these three terms as
they relate to the learner.
The U.S. Department of Education defined the terms: personalization, differentiation,
and individualization in the 2010 Education Technology Plan:
Individualization refers to instruction that is paced to the learning needs of different
learners. Learning goals are the same for all students, but students can progress
through the material at different speeds according to their learning needs. For example,
students might take longer to progress through a given topic skip topics that cover
information they already know, or repeat topics they need more help on.
Differentiation refers to instruction that is tailored to the learning preferences of
different learners. Learning goals are the same for all students, but the method or
approach of instruction varies according to the preferences of each student or what
research has found works best for students like them.
Personalization refers to instruction that is paced to learning needs, tailored to
learning preferences, and tailored to the specific interests of different learners. In an
environment that is fully personalized, the learning objectives and content as well as the
method and pace may all vary (so personalization encompasses differentiation and
individualization).
http://www.ed.gov/technology/draft-netp-2010/individualized-personalized-differentiated-instruction
The definitions the Ed Tech plan focuses on instruction -- not learning. These
definitions motivated us to create a chart that compares these terms. We created
the original chart in January 2012 to provide a resource as a reference to the three
terms and how the terms “Personalization,” “Personalized Learning” or
“Personalizing Learning” focus on the learner not instruction. We determined that
using the term “learners” was a more accurate term than “students” in all learning
environments. We see learning happening anywhere at anytime with anyone so the
learner will end up driving and owning their learning. We updated this chart
(version 2) March 2013 from feedback and input from educators from around the
world.
Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K.
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
3
Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Chart (v2)
The main difference between personalization, differentiation, and individualization
is that one is learner-centered and the others are teacher-centered.
Personalization Differentiation Individualization
The Learner… The Teacher… The Teacher…
drives their learning. provides instruction to
groups of learners.
provides instruction to an
individual learner.
connects learning with interests,
talents, passions, and aspirations.
adjusts learning needs for
groups of learners.
accommodates learning needs
for the individual learner.
actively participates in the design
of their learning.
designs instruction based on
the learning needs of
different groups of learners.
customizes instruction based
on the learning needs of the
individual learner.
owns and is responsible for their
learning that includes their voice
and choice on how and what they
learn.
is responsible for a variety of
instruction for different
groups of learners.
is responsible for modifying
instruction based on the needs
of the individual learner.
identifies goals for their learning
plan and benchmarks as they
progress along their learning path
with guidance from teacher.
identifies the same
objectives for different
groups of learners.
identifies the same objectives
for all learners with specific
objectives for individuals who
receive one-on-one support.
develops the skills to select and
use the appropriate technology
and resources to support and
enhance their learning.
selects technology and
resources to support the
learning needs of different
groups of learners.
selects technology and
resources to support the
learning needs of the
individual learner.
builds a network of peers,
experts, and teachers to guide
and support their learning.
supports groups of learners
who are reliant on them to
support their learning.
understands the individual
learner is dependent on them
to support their learning.
demonstrates mastery of content
in a competency-based system.
monitors learning based on
Carnegie unit (seat time)
and grade level.
monitors learning based on
Carnegie unit (seat time) and
grade level.
becomes a self-directed, expert
learner who monitors progress
and reflects on learning based on
mastery of content and skills.
uses data and assessments
to modify teaching and
provides feedback for groups
and individual learners to
advance learning.
uses data and assessments to
report the progress of what the
individual learner learned to
decide next steps in their
learning.
Assessment OF Learning measures learner performance. Assessment FOR Learning provides
feedback throughout the process. Assessment AS Learning encompasses Assessment FOR
Learning where the learner monitors their progress and reflects on their own learning.
Personalized Learning Chart v2 (2013) by Barbara Bray & Kathleen McClaskey is licensed
under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. For
permission to distribute copies or to use in a publication, please contact Personalize Learning,
LLC at personalizelearn@gmail.com or use the contact form at www.personalizelearning.com
Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K.
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
4
Chart Explained
This chart spurred discussions from educators around the world about the term,
personalized learning. Not only were there thousands of daily hits and multiple requests
for the chart, we were asked many questions to clarify different elements of the chart.
We used some of these questions to expand on the chart for schools and organizations
to have background information and resources to support their discussions. The
questions we focus on for clarification purposes include:
● What does teaching and learning look like as it relates to these terms?
● How do we determine the learner’s needs?
● How does the learner participate in their learning?
● How are the goals and objectives determined for the learner?
● How do learners support their learning and each other?
● How do you know if learning is meaningful?
● How do you assess learning?
What does teaching and learning look like as it relates to these terms?
In an individualized learning environment, the learner’s needs are identified
through evaluations based on their challenges or disabilities. The teacher reviews
the findings and recommendations from the evaluations with other professionals to
adapt materials and instruction for an individual learner with cognitive or physical
challenges.
“If you remove the veil of disability, you can see the learner.”
Kathleen McClaskey
In a differentiated learning environment, learners are identified based upon their
challenges in a specific content area and skill levels. The teacher uses existing
differentiated curriculum or adapts instruction to meet the needs of different groups of
learners.
In a personalized learning environment, learning starts with the learner. The learner
understands how they learn best so they can become an active participant in designing
their learning goals along with the teacher.
Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K.
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
5
How do we determine the learner’s needs?
We can determine each learner’s needs by using an adapted version of the UDL
(Universal Design for Learning) Class Learning Profile as a Class Learning SnapshotTM
anticipating how learners in your class learn best. Each learner creates a Personal
Learner ProfileTM
so they can understand their strengths, challenges, aptitudes,
interests, talents, and, aspirations. CAST (Center for Applied Special Technology) states
that common sense tells us that each learner is unique.
Using the Class Learning SnapshotTM
, teachers discover how learners learn best and how
they prefer and need to:
● access information and content
● engage with content
● express what they know and understand
“©	
  CAST	
  2011.	
  Used	
  with	
  permission.	
  All	
  rights	
  reserved.”	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/whatisudl	
  
Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K.
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
6
An individualized learning environment may involve learners with special needs where
they may have an individual education plan (IEP). These learners have been evaluated
to determine their strengths and challenges in areas such as: reading, math, writing and
other cognitive challenges. From these evaluations, a set of measurable goals is
determined along with accommodations for the individual learner in an IEP. An
agreement by the IEP Team is needed to implement them. Implementation can include
out of classroom one-to-one instruction and/or tutoring plus classroom accommodations
by the teacher with frequent support by an instructional aide or para-professional. Other
examples may include when a teacher or another professional determines a learner
needs individual support such as RTI, gifted program, Title I, or one-to-one tutoring.
Differentiation is responsive teaching rather than “one size fits all” teaching where
teachers proactively plan varied approaches to what different groups of learners need to
learn, how they will learn it, and/or how they will show what they have learned.
According to Carol Tomlinson from Differentiation Central (Differentiationcentral.com),
differentiating instruction increases the likelihood that each learner will learn as much as
he or she can, as efficiently as possible.
“I am always ready to learn although I do not always like being taught.”
Winston Churchill
In a personalized learning environment, the Class Learning SnapshotTM
guides the
teacher in understanding how the learners in their classroom learn best. The Personal
Learner ProfileTM
provides each learner their own understanding of how they learn best.
With this information, the teacher and learner become partners in learning. The learner
has a voice in how they like to acquire information, and a choice in how they express
what they know and what ways they like to engage with the content. When learners
have ownership and take responsibility for their learning, they are more motivated to
learn and engaged in the learning process.
“Find your passion and purpose. Go with your strengths.”
Barbara Bray
Acknowledging other learning environments, CAST (Center for Applied Special
Technology) made the change from using the word “student” to “learner” in the UDL
Guidelines 2.0, because the term “student” is too narrow. Student implies someone
who is in the classroom. CAST realized that learning happens in many different
learning environments where the term student might not be traditionally applied
(e.g. museums, after-school programs, adult learning, etc.) The word learner was
therefore chosen because of the ranges of situations to which it could apply.
http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/udlguidelines/changes
Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K.
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
7
How does a learner participate in their learning?
In an individualized learning environment, learning is passive. Teachers or para-
professionals deliver instruction to individual learners. The learner has no voice in the
design of their instruction or choice in what they learn in this environment. The
instruction is based on each learner’s needs.
In a differentiated classroom, learners can be passive participants in their learning.
Teachers use direct instruction that they differentiated based upon the learning needs of
different groups of learners in their classroom. Some teachers may set up learning
stations or flip the classroom with multiple ways of showing the same content to
different types of learners. This confuses educators into thinking that if they flip the
classroom, some teachers consider that learners are personalizing their learning. But,
actually, learners are still passively receiving content and directions on what to learn.
When learners have choices to interact with the content, discuss what they watched,
read, or learned the night before, they are actively participating as learners. However,
this is still not personalizing learning. The teacher still chose the topics and how learners
demonstrate understanding.
“School is torture because I am required to spend all my time doing menial
tasks, worksheets, and rote memorization. This takes too much time away
from being able to discover my hobbies, interests, or passions. I don’t foresee
having the ability to do that before I graduate high school.”
Adam Ritter, 10th grade student (Facebook)
When a learner personalizes their learning, learners actively participate and drive their
learning. They have a voice in what they are learning based on how they learn best.
Learners have a choice in how they demonstrate evidence of their learning. Learners
own and co-design their learning. The teacher is their guide on their personal journey.
Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K.
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
8
How are goals and objectives determined for the learner?
When you individualize learning, learners may have the same objectives as all the
learners in the class. However, there can be specific objectives for learners who may
need one-on-one support. Teachers or para-professionals then support and provide
accommodations for individual learners to meet these specific objectives.
To differentiate learning, a teacher identifies the same objectives for different groups of
learners. Teachers use and analyze data to identify the different learners in their
classroom. From this data, they can use, adapt, or create different lessons or resources
on a concept around the same objectives based on the different group of learners.
To personalize learning, teachers and learners identify the learner’s goals based on how
they learn best. The learner designs their learning plan or develops benchmarks as they
go along their learning path. One teacher calls them “Personal Journeys” or PJs. In these
cases, the learner drives and owns their learning. The learner follows their learning path,
monitors their progress in meeting the benchmarks, and reflects on their progress.
“The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read
and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn.”
Alvin Toffler
Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K.
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
9
How do learners support their learning and each other?
In an individualized learning environment, tools and resources are selected by the
teacher and are sometimes recommended by an evaluator, special education
professional or consultant. The tools could include specialized software and/or hardware
that support the specific IEP goals agreed to by the IEP Team. In the best cases,
teachers or para-professionals learn how to use theses specialized tools so that they can
instruct students in the use of these tools to support their learning. If these tools are
used consistently, the learner then adopts them as part of their toolkit. If the teacher
works with individual learners in a Title I program, a RTI program or a one-to-one
tutoring situation, they probably chose the tools based on the programs they are using
for the task at hand.
In a differentiated learning environment, the teacher selects the tools and resources for
the groups of learners based upon the activities or products that are included in the
lesson. The teacher also considers how appropriate a tool or resource is for the different
groups of learners. The learner may be able to choose content or a resource based upon
their reading or skill level.
“Digital literacy is the ability to choose and use the technology for the task.”
Kathleen McClaskey
In a personalized learning environment, learners access appropriate tools to support
their learning. They have critical thinking skills so they can self select the tools they
need to support any learning task, whether at school or home. Digital literacy is an
essential skill in a personalized learning environment. As 21st century learners, they
collaborate, share, and learn with their peers, experts, and other learners around the
world. Being a connected learner is an essential skill in a personalized learning
environment. Each learner builds their network and connections based on the topic,
resource, and skill. Everyone can be an expert learner.
“When the learner owns and drives their learning, they have the skills to choose the
appropriate resources, tools, and strategies to meet their learning goals.”
Barbara Bray
Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K.
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
10
How do you know if learning is meaningful?
In individualized and differentiated learning environments, learners are awarded credit
for classes on the basis of the Carnegie unit that plays a powerful role in managing
transactions within the education system. First, it provides a unit of exchange to allow
different schools and institutions to relate to each other, especially the transition from
high school to college. Second, the Carnegie unit is based upon the amount of time that
a teacher is in front of a classroom and the time learners are in school. It doesn’t take
into account how effective the teacher is, how much time and effort the teacher
contributes outside the classroom, or how much time and effort learners contribute.
Competency-based pathways are based on mastery not on seat time that expects
teachers to help all learners succeed in mastering skills.
iNACOL (International Association for K-12 Online Learning) developed a website on
“Competency-Based Pathways” that describes five design principles.
Design Principle 1: Students (Learners) Advance upon Mastery
Design Principle 2: Explicit and Measurable Learning Objectives Empower
Students (Learners)
Design Principle 3: Assessment Is Meaningful and a Positive Learning Experience
for Students (Learners)
Design Principle 4: Students (Learners) Receive Rapid, Differentiated Support
Design Principle 5: Learning Outcomes Emphasize Include Application and
Creation of Knowledge
You probably noticed that w inserted the word “Learners” in parenthesis wherever the
word “Students” is listed.
Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K.
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
11
How do you assess learning?
In an individualized learning environment, data and
usually summative assessments are used to determine
the progress an individual learner has made. This
information determines where a learner may be placed
and what strategies need to be deployed to improve
his/her progress. Assessment OF and FOR learning may
be used to determine learner performance and progress.
In a differentiated learning environment, data and
assessments are used to provide progress or performance
information to the teacher so that instructional methods
and materials can be modified for groups of learners and
individual learners as needed. It also determines where a
learner may be placed in the different groups of learners.
Assessment OF and FOR Learning are applicable when
differentiating instruction.
In a personalized learning environment, the learner has
the skills to self-assess their learning, to monitor their
progress and to reflect on their learning using a variety
of instruments and strategies. The learner often designs
their own assessments with guidance from their
teacher. The learner becomes motivated as they master
their learning and gain skills to advance their own
learning using assessment AS and FOR learning.
The report Rethinking Classroom Assessment with
Purpose in Mind shows the focus has been on
assessment of learning where teachers measure student
learning after the fact (Diagram 1). To ensure learners
are acquiring essential skills such as self-regulation, a
shift towards assessment as learning is required where
learners evaluate and adapt their own learning (Diagram 2).
British Columbia created an
interactive discussion guide
on Personalized Learning. On
page 18 of the PDF guide,
they state that “student
assessment is the process of
gathering evidence of what a
student knows, understands
and is able to do and
determines how well they are
achieving the learning
outcomes.”
Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K.
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
12
Assessment OF Learning refers to strategies designed to confirm what learners know,
demonstrate whether or not they have met curriculum outcomes or the goals of their
individualized programs, or to certify proficiency and make decisions about learners’
future programs or placements. Effective Assessment OF Learning requires that
teachers provide:
● a rationale for undertaking a particular assessment of learning at a particular point in
time.
● clear descriptions of the intended learning.
● processes make it possible for learners to demonstrate their competence and skill.
● a range of alternative mechanisms for assessing the same outcomes.
● public and defensible reference points for making judgments.
● transparent approaches to interpretation.
● descriptions of the assessment process.
● strategies for recourse in the event of disagreement about the decisions.
Assessment FOR Learning occurs throughout the learning process. It is interactive,
with teachers:
● aligning instruction with the targeted outcomes.
● identifying particular learning needs of learners or groups.
● selecting and adapting materials and resources.
● creating differentiated teaching strategies and learning opportunities for helping
individual learners move forward in their learning.
● providing immediate feedback and direction to learners.
Assessment FOR Learning provides information about what learners already know
and can do, so that teachers can design the most appropriate next steps in instruction.
Assessment AS Learning is based in research about how learning happens, and is
characterized by learners reflecting on their own learning and making adjustments so
that they achieve deeper understanding. The teacher’s role in promoting the
development of independent, expert learners through Assessment AS Learning is to:
● model and teach the skills of self-assessment.
● guide learners in setting goals, and monitoring their progress toward them.
● provide exemplars and models of good practice and quality work that reflect
curriculum outcomes.
● work with learners to develop clear criteria of good practice.
● guide learners in developing internal feedback or self-monitoring mechanisms to
validate and question their own thinking, and to become comfortable with the
ambiguity and uncertainty that is inevitable in learning anything new.
● provide regular and challenging opportunities to practise, so that learners can
become confident, competent self-assessors.
● monitor learners’ meta-cognitive processes as well as their learning, and provide
descriptive feedback.
● create an environment where it is safe for learners to take chances and where
support is readily available.
Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K.
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
13
Reporting in Assessment AS Learning is the responsibility of learners, who must learn
to articulate and defend the nature and quality of their learning. When learners reflect
on their own learning and must communicate it to others, they are intensifying their
understanding about a topic, their own learning strengths, and the areas in which they
need to develop further.
We included Assessment OF, FOR, and AS Learning for a reason. Assessment has
always been assumed to be the teacher’s responsibility.
• Assessment OF Learning is when the teacher is analyzing data and summative
assessments about a learner. The teacher is in control of the learning and the
direction of instruction. The learner may not have an understanding of their
learning.
• Assessment FOR Learning is when the teacher includes the learner in analyzing
data and formative assessments, the teacher and learner are working together to
support learning.
• Assessment AS Learning personalizes learning because the learner is
monitoring and reflecting on their learning. This means the learner takes
responsibility for their learning.
Assessment AS Learning is a fundamental shift in thinking around teaching, learning,
and assessment.
“I am still learning.”
Michelangelo
References
● Image on cover from Mid-Pacific Institute’s One-on-One Program
http://www.midpac.edu/one-to-one/
● 2010 U.S. Education Technology Plan: http://www.ed.gov/technology/draft-netp-
2010/individualized-personalized-differentiated-instruction
● “Competency-Based Pathways” Google site developed by iNACOL staff.
● Personalized Learning in British Columbia: Interactive Discussion Guide. British
Columbia Ministry of Education. (2011) http://www.personalizedlearningbc.ca
● Rethinking Classroom Assessment with Purpose in Mind: Assessment for Learning,
Assessment as Learning, Assessment of Learning. The Crown in Right of
Manitoba as represented by the Minister of Education, Citizenship and Youth.
Manitoba Education, Citizenship and Youth. Winnipeg, Manitoba (2006).
● Rose, David & Meyer, Anne. Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age. CAST.
(ASCD, 2002)
● Tomlinson, Carol. Differentiation Central: Differentiationcentral.com
● What is UDL? www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/whatisudl
Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K.
is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
14
The Personalized Learning Chart (v2) and all derivatives of the chart along
with adaptations of the explanations in this report by Barbara Bray and
Kathleen McClaskey are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-
NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Class Learning SnapshotTM
and The Personal Learner ProfileTM
are trademarks of
Personalize Learning, LLC.
If you have any questions, comments, want to make copies or changes to the chart,
include the chart in a publication, want us to write about how you are using the chart, or
would like us to help you personalize learning, contact us personalizelearn@gmail.com
and visit our website for more information and resources: www.personalizelearning.com

More Related Content

Similar to Pdi report-v2-8(1)

PDI Chart, v3 - Australian/United Kingdom version
PDI Chart, v3 - Australian/United Kingdom versionPDI Chart, v3 - Australian/United Kingdom version
PDI Chart, v3 - Australian/United Kingdom versionKathleen McClaskey
 
Read belowwrite one long paragraph each for each readings response.docx
Read belowwrite one long paragraph each for each readings response.docxRead belowwrite one long paragraph each for each readings response.docx
Read belowwrite one long paragraph each for each readings response.docxtawnan2hsurra
 
1 Differentiating for Student Readiness and Interest D.docx
1 Differentiating for Student Readiness and Interest D.docx1 Differentiating for Student Readiness and Interest D.docx
1 Differentiating for Student Readiness and Interest D.docxoswald1horne84988
 
Twice exceptional students
Twice exceptional studentsTwice exceptional students
Twice exceptional studentsStephanie Quinn
 
Writing Learning Material and Textbook Level PhD (1).pptx
Writing Learning Material and Textbook Level PhD (1).pptxWriting Learning Material and Textbook Level PhD (1).pptx
Writing Learning Material and Textbook Level PhD (1).pptxDrHafizKosar
 
Power of Student Choice
Power of Student Choice Power of Student Choice
Power of Student Choice lesliesmll
 
Power of Choice- Haiku Deck
Power of Choice- Haiku DeckPower of Choice- Haiku Deck
Power of Choice- Haiku Decklesliesmll
 
Personalization vs. Differentiation vs. Individualization Report-v3
Personalization vs. Differentiation vs. Individualization Report-v3Personalization vs. Differentiation vs. Individualization Report-v3
Personalization vs. Differentiation vs. Individualization Report-v3Barbara Bray
 
Personalization vs. Differentiation vs. Individualization Report-v3
Personalization vs. Differentiation vs. Individualization Report-v3Personalization vs. Differentiation vs. Individualization Report-v3
Personalization vs. Differentiation vs. Individualization Report-v3Kathleen McClaskey
 
6731 wk 3 app
6731 wk 3 app6731 wk 3 app
6731 wk 3 appdkawcak
 
Debramorrispresentationudl
DebramorrispresentationudlDebramorrispresentationudl
DebramorrispresentationudlDebbie Morris
 
Personalized learning module -storyboard sarah lowey
Personalized learning module -storyboard sarah loweyPersonalized learning module -storyboard sarah lowey
Personalized learning module -storyboard sarah loweySarah Lowey
 
Student centric web - Red Centrada en el Estudiante
Student centric web - Red Centrada en el EstudianteStudent centric web - Red Centrada en el Estudiante
Student centric web - Red Centrada en el EstudianteItslearning México
 
Inclusion day 3 4 23 updated again
Inclusion day 3 4 23 updated againInclusion day 3 4 23 updated again
Inclusion day 3 4 23 updated againshighla
 
Differentiation models
Differentiation modelsDifferentiation models
Differentiation modelsMelissa Jacobs
 
At UC, it is a priority that students are provided with strong edu.docx
At UC, it is a priority that students are provided with strong edu.docxAt UC, it is a priority that students are provided with strong edu.docx
At UC, it is a priority that students are provided with strong edu.docxjaggernaoma
 

Similar to Pdi report-v2-8(1) (20)

Personalized Learning Chart v3
Personalized Learning Chart v3 Personalized Learning Chart v3
Personalized Learning Chart v3
 
PDI Chart, v3 - Australian/United Kingdom version
PDI Chart, v3 - Australian/United Kingdom versionPDI Chart, v3 - Australian/United Kingdom version
PDI Chart, v3 - Australian/United Kingdom version
 
Read belowwrite one long paragraph each for each readings response.docx
Read belowwrite one long paragraph each for each readings response.docxRead belowwrite one long paragraph each for each readings response.docx
Read belowwrite one long paragraph each for each readings response.docx
 
1 Differentiating for Student Readiness and Interest D.docx
1 Differentiating for Student Readiness and Interest D.docx1 Differentiating for Student Readiness and Interest D.docx
1 Differentiating for Student Readiness and Interest D.docx
 
Twice exceptional students
Twice exceptional studentsTwice exceptional students
Twice exceptional students
 
Writing Learning Material and Textbook Level PhD (1).pptx
Writing Learning Material and Textbook Level PhD (1).pptxWriting Learning Material and Textbook Level PhD (1).pptx
Writing Learning Material and Textbook Level PhD (1).pptx
 
Power of Student Choice
Power of Student Choice Power of Student Choice
Power of Student Choice
 
Power of Choice- Haiku Deck
Power of Choice- Haiku DeckPower of Choice- Haiku Deck
Power of Choice- Haiku Deck
 
Personalization vs. Differentiation vs. Individualization Report-v3
Personalization vs. Differentiation vs. Individualization Report-v3Personalization vs. Differentiation vs. Individualization Report-v3
Personalization vs. Differentiation vs. Individualization Report-v3
 
Personalization vs. Differentiation vs. Individualization Report-v3
Personalization vs. Differentiation vs. Individualization Report-v3Personalization vs. Differentiation vs. Individualization Report-v3
Personalization vs. Differentiation vs. Individualization Report-v3
 
6731 wk 3 app
6731 wk 3 app6731 wk 3 app
6731 wk 3 app
 
Power pics
Power picsPower pics
Power pics
 
Debramorrispresentationudl
DebramorrispresentationudlDebramorrispresentationudl
Debramorrispresentationudl
 
Personalized learning module -storyboard sarah lowey
Personalized learning module -storyboard sarah loweyPersonalized learning module -storyboard sarah lowey
Personalized learning module -storyboard sarah lowey
 
Student centric web - Red Centrada en el Estudiante
Student centric web - Red Centrada en el EstudianteStudent centric web - Red Centrada en el Estudiante
Student centric web - Red Centrada en el Estudiante
 
Poster - Personal Competencies Model
Poster - Personal Competencies ModelPoster - Personal Competencies Model
Poster - Personal Competencies Model
 
Inclusion day 3 4 23 updated again
Inclusion day 3 4 23 updated againInclusion day 3 4 23 updated again
Inclusion day 3 4 23 updated again
 
Cad rubrics
Cad rubricsCad rubrics
Cad rubrics
 
Differentiation models
Differentiation modelsDifferentiation models
Differentiation models
 
At UC, it is a priority that students are provided with strong edu.docx
At UC, it is a priority that students are provided with strong edu.docxAt UC, it is a priority that students are provided with strong edu.docx
At UC, it is a priority that students are provided with strong edu.docx
 

Recently uploaded

Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfWeb & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfJayanti Pande
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13Steve Thomason
 
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Krashi Coaching
 
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...fonyou31
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactdawncurless
 
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)eniolaolutunde
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityGeoBlogs
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...EduSkills OECD
 
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfSoniaTolstoy
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingTechSoup
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionMaksud Ahmed
 
9548086042 for call girls in Indira Nagar with room service
9548086042  for call girls in Indira Nagar  with room service9548086042  for call girls in Indira Nagar  with room service
9548086042 for call girls in Indira Nagar with room servicediscovermytutordmt
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Celine George
 
General AI for Medical Educators April 2024
General AI for Medical Educators April 2024General AI for Medical Educators April 2024
General AI for Medical Educators April 2024Janet Corral
 
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationInteractive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationnomboosow
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfagholdier
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdfQucHHunhnh
 
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104misteraugie
 
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..Disha Kariya
 
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAPM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAssociation for Project Management
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdfWeb & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
Web & Social Media Analytics Previous Year Question Paper.pdf
 
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
The Most Excellent Way | 1 Corinthians 13
 
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
 
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
Ecosystem Interactions Class Discussion Presentation in Blue Green Lined Styl...
 
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impactAccessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
Accessible design: Minimum effort, maximum impact
 
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
Software Engineering Methodologies (overview)
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
 
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
Presentation by Andreas Schleicher Tackling the School Absenteeism Crisis 30 ...
 
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdfBASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK  LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
BASLIQ CURRENT LOOKBOOK LOOKBOOK(1) (1).pdf
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 
9548086042 for call girls in Indira Nagar with room service
9548086042  for call girls in Indira Nagar  with room service9548086042  for call girls in Indira Nagar  with room service
9548086042 for call girls in Indira Nagar with room service
 
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
Advanced Views - Calendar View in Odoo 17
 
General AI for Medical Educators April 2024
General AI for Medical Educators April 2024General AI for Medical Educators April 2024
General AI for Medical Educators April 2024
 
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communicationInteractive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
Interactive Powerpoint_How to Master effective communication
 
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdfHoldier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
Holdier Curriculum Vitae (April 2024).pdf
 
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf1029 -  Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
1029 - Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa 10 . pdf
 
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
Nutritional Needs Presentation - HLTH 104
 
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
 
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across SectorsAPM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
APM Welcome, APM North West Network Conference, Synergies Across Sectors
 

Pdi report-v2-8(1)

  • 1. Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. 1 Mid-Pacific Institute 1:1 iPad Program Personalization vs. Differentiation vs. Individualization Report (v2) by Barbara Bray and Kathleen McClaskey Co-Founders of Personalize Learning, LLC www.personalizelearning.com “The only thing that interferes with my learning is my education.” Albert Einstein
  • 2. Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. 2 Personalization vs. Differentiation vs. Individualization Report (V2) by Barbara Bray and Kathleen McClaskey, Co-Founders of Personalize Learning, LLC There is a difference between personalization, differentiation and individualization. The first is learner-centered; the others are teacher-centered. There seems to be confusion in the education world about the differences and comparisons of these three terms as they relate to the learner. The U.S. Department of Education defined the terms: personalization, differentiation, and individualization in the 2010 Education Technology Plan: Individualization refers to instruction that is paced to the learning needs of different learners. Learning goals are the same for all students, but students can progress through the material at different speeds according to their learning needs. For example, students might take longer to progress through a given topic skip topics that cover information they already know, or repeat topics they need more help on. Differentiation refers to instruction that is tailored to the learning preferences of different learners. Learning goals are the same for all students, but the method or approach of instruction varies according to the preferences of each student or what research has found works best for students like them. Personalization refers to instruction that is paced to learning needs, tailored to learning preferences, and tailored to the specific interests of different learners. In an environment that is fully personalized, the learning objectives and content as well as the method and pace may all vary (so personalization encompasses differentiation and individualization). http://www.ed.gov/technology/draft-netp-2010/individualized-personalized-differentiated-instruction The definitions the Ed Tech plan focuses on instruction -- not learning. These definitions motivated us to create a chart that compares these terms. We created the original chart in January 2012 to provide a resource as a reference to the three terms and how the terms “Personalization,” “Personalized Learning” or “Personalizing Learning” focus on the learner not instruction. We determined that using the term “learners” was a more accurate term than “students” in all learning environments. We see learning happening anywhere at anytime with anyone so the learner will end up driving and owning their learning. We updated this chart (version 2) March 2013 from feedback and input from educators from around the world.
  • 3. Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. 3 Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Chart (v2) The main difference between personalization, differentiation, and individualization is that one is learner-centered and the others are teacher-centered. Personalization Differentiation Individualization The Learner… The Teacher… The Teacher… drives their learning. provides instruction to groups of learners. provides instruction to an individual learner. connects learning with interests, talents, passions, and aspirations. adjusts learning needs for groups of learners. accommodates learning needs for the individual learner. actively participates in the design of their learning. designs instruction based on the learning needs of different groups of learners. customizes instruction based on the learning needs of the individual learner. owns and is responsible for their learning that includes their voice and choice on how and what they learn. is responsible for a variety of instruction for different groups of learners. is responsible for modifying instruction based on the needs of the individual learner. identifies goals for their learning plan and benchmarks as they progress along their learning path with guidance from teacher. identifies the same objectives for different groups of learners. identifies the same objectives for all learners with specific objectives for individuals who receive one-on-one support. develops the skills to select and use the appropriate technology and resources to support and enhance their learning. selects technology and resources to support the learning needs of different groups of learners. selects technology and resources to support the learning needs of the individual learner. builds a network of peers, experts, and teachers to guide and support their learning. supports groups of learners who are reliant on them to support their learning. understands the individual learner is dependent on them to support their learning. demonstrates mastery of content in a competency-based system. monitors learning based on Carnegie unit (seat time) and grade level. monitors learning based on Carnegie unit (seat time) and grade level. becomes a self-directed, expert learner who monitors progress and reflects on learning based on mastery of content and skills. uses data and assessments to modify teaching and provides feedback for groups and individual learners to advance learning. uses data and assessments to report the progress of what the individual learner learned to decide next steps in their learning. Assessment OF Learning measures learner performance. Assessment FOR Learning provides feedback throughout the process. Assessment AS Learning encompasses Assessment FOR Learning where the learner monitors their progress and reflects on their own learning. Personalized Learning Chart v2 (2013) by Barbara Bray & Kathleen McClaskey is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. For permission to distribute copies or to use in a publication, please contact Personalize Learning, LLC at personalizelearn@gmail.com or use the contact form at www.personalizelearning.com
  • 4. Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. 4 Chart Explained This chart spurred discussions from educators around the world about the term, personalized learning. Not only were there thousands of daily hits and multiple requests for the chart, we were asked many questions to clarify different elements of the chart. We used some of these questions to expand on the chart for schools and organizations to have background information and resources to support their discussions. The questions we focus on for clarification purposes include: ● What does teaching and learning look like as it relates to these terms? ● How do we determine the learner’s needs? ● How does the learner participate in their learning? ● How are the goals and objectives determined for the learner? ● How do learners support their learning and each other? ● How do you know if learning is meaningful? ● How do you assess learning? What does teaching and learning look like as it relates to these terms? In an individualized learning environment, the learner’s needs are identified through evaluations based on their challenges or disabilities. The teacher reviews the findings and recommendations from the evaluations with other professionals to adapt materials and instruction for an individual learner with cognitive or physical challenges. “If you remove the veil of disability, you can see the learner.” Kathleen McClaskey In a differentiated learning environment, learners are identified based upon their challenges in a specific content area and skill levels. The teacher uses existing differentiated curriculum or adapts instruction to meet the needs of different groups of learners. In a personalized learning environment, learning starts with the learner. The learner understands how they learn best so they can become an active participant in designing their learning goals along with the teacher.
  • 5. Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. 5 How do we determine the learner’s needs? We can determine each learner’s needs by using an adapted version of the UDL (Universal Design for Learning) Class Learning Profile as a Class Learning SnapshotTM anticipating how learners in your class learn best. Each learner creates a Personal Learner ProfileTM so they can understand their strengths, challenges, aptitudes, interests, talents, and, aspirations. CAST (Center for Applied Special Technology) states that common sense tells us that each learner is unique. Using the Class Learning SnapshotTM , teachers discover how learners learn best and how they prefer and need to: ● access information and content ● engage with content ● express what they know and understand “©  CAST  2011.  Used  with  permission.  All  rights  reserved.”            www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/whatisudl  
  • 6. Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. 6 An individualized learning environment may involve learners with special needs where they may have an individual education plan (IEP). These learners have been evaluated to determine their strengths and challenges in areas such as: reading, math, writing and other cognitive challenges. From these evaluations, a set of measurable goals is determined along with accommodations for the individual learner in an IEP. An agreement by the IEP Team is needed to implement them. Implementation can include out of classroom one-to-one instruction and/or tutoring plus classroom accommodations by the teacher with frequent support by an instructional aide or para-professional. Other examples may include when a teacher or another professional determines a learner needs individual support such as RTI, gifted program, Title I, or one-to-one tutoring. Differentiation is responsive teaching rather than “one size fits all” teaching where teachers proactively plan varied approaches to what different groups of learners need to learn, how they will learn it, and/or how they will show what they have learned. According to Carol Tomlinson from Differentiation Central (Differentiationcentral.com), differentiating instruction increases the likelihood that each learner will learn as much as he or she can, as efficiently as possible. “I am always ready to learn although I do not always like being taught.” Winston Churchill In a personalized learning environment, the Class Learning SnapshotTM guides the teacher in understanding how the learners in their classroom learn best. The Personal Learner ProfileTM provides each learner their own understanding of how they learn best. With this information, the teacher and learner become partners in learning. The learner has a voice in how they like to acquire information, and a choice in how they express what they know and what ways they like to engage with the content. When learners have ownership and take responsibility for their learning, they are more motivated to learn and engaged in the learning process. “Find your passion and purpose. Go with your strengths.” Barbara Bray Acknowledging other learning environments, CAST (Center for Applied Special Technology) made the change from using the word “student” to “learner” in the UDL Guidelines 2.0, because the term “student” is too narrow. Student implies someone who is in the classroom. CAST realized that learning happens in many different learning environments where the term student might not be traditionally applied (e.g. museums, after-school programs, adult learning, etc.) The word learner was therefore chosen because of the ranges of situations to which it could apply. http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/udlguidelines/changes
  • 7. Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. 7 How does a learner participate in their learning? In an individualized learning environment, learning is passive. Teachers or para- professionals deliver instruction to individual learners. The learner has no voice in the design of their instruction or choice in what they learn in this environment. The instruction is based on each learner’s needs. In a differentiated classroom, learners can be passive participants in their learning. Teachers use direct instruction that they differentiated based upon the learning needs of different groups of learners in their classroom. Some teachers may set up learning stations or flip the classroom with multiple ways of showing the same content to different types of learners. This confuses educators into thinking that if they flip the classroom, some teachers consider that learners are personalizing their learning. But, actually, learners are still passively receiving content and directions on what to learn. When learners have choices to interact with the content, discuss what they watched, read, or learned the night before, they are actively participating as learners. However, this is still not personalizing learning. The teacher still chose the topics and how learners demonstrate understanding. “School is torture because I am required to spend all my time doing menial tasks, worksheets, and rote memorization. This takes too much time away from being able to discover my hobbies, interests, or passions. I don’t foresee having the ability to do that before I graduate high school.” Adam Ritter, 10th grade student (Facebook) When a learner personalizes their learning, learners actively participate and drive their learning. They have a voice in what they are learning based on how they learn best. Learners have a choice in how they demonstrate evidence of their learning. Learners own and co-design their learning. The teacher is their guide on their personal journey.
  • 8. Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. 8 How are goals and objectives determined for the learner? When you individualize learning, learners may have the same objectives as all the learners in the class. However, there can be specific objectives for learners who may need one-on-one support. Teachers or para-professionals then support and provide accommodations for individual learners to meet these specific objectives. To differentiate learning, a teacher identifies the same objectives for different groups of learners. Teachers use and analyze data to identify the different learners in their classroom. From this data, they can use, adapt, or create different lessons or resources on a concept around the same objectives based on the different group of learners. To personalize learning, teachers and learners identify the learner’s goals based on how they learn best. The learner designs their learning plan or develops benchmarks as they go along their learning path. One teacher calls them “Personal Journeys” or PJs. In these cases, the learner drives and owns their learning. The learner follows their learning path, monitors their progress in meeting the benchmarks, and reflects on their progress. “The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn.” Alvin Toffler
  • 9. Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. 9 How do learners support their learning and each other? In an individualized learning environment, tools and resources are selected by the teacher and are sometimes recommended by an evaluator, special education professional or consultant. The tools could include specialized software and/or hardware that support the specific IEP goals agreed to by the IEP Team. In the best cases, teachers or para-professionals learn how to use theses specialized tools so that they can instruct students in the use of these tools to support their learning. If these tools are used consistently, the learner then adopts them as part of their toolkit. If the teacher works with individual learners in a Title I program, a RTI program or a one-to-one tutoring situation, they probably chose the tools based on the programs they are using for the task at hand. In a differentiated learning environment, the teacher selects the tools and resources for the groups of learners based upon the activities or products that are included in the lesson. The teacher also considers how appropriate a tool or resource is for the different groups of learners. The learner may be able to choose content or a resource based upon their reading or skill level. “Digital literacy is the ability to choose and use the technology for the task.” Kathleen McClaskey In a personalized learning environment, learners access appropriate tools to support their learning. They have critical thinking skills so they can self select the tools they need to support any learning task, whether at school or home. Digital literacy is an essential skill in a personalized learning environment. As 21st century learners, they collaborate, share, and learn with their peers, experts, and other learners around the world. Being a connected learner is an essential skill in a personalized learning environment. Each learner builds their network and connections based on the topic, resource, and skill. Everyone can be an expert learner. “When the learner owns and drives their learning, they have the skills to choose the appropriate resources, tools, and strategies to meet their learning goals.” Barbara Bray
  • 10. Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. 10 How do you know if learning is meaningful? In individualized and differentiated learning environments, learners are awarded credit for classes on the basis of the Carnegie unit that plays a powerful role in managing transactions within the education system. First, it provides a unit of exchange to allow different schools and institutions to relate to each other, especially the transition from high school to college. Second, the Carnegie unit is based upon the amount of time that a teacher is in front of a classroom and the time learners are in school. It doesn’t take into account how effective the teacher is, how much time and effort the teacher contributes outside the classroom, or how much time and effort learners contribute. Competency-based pathways are based on mastery not on seat time that expects teachers to help all learners succeed in mastering skills. iNACOL (International Association for K-12 Online Learning) developed a website on “Competency-Based Pathways” that describes five design principles. Design Principle 1: Students (Learners) Advance upon Mastery Design Principle 2: Explicit and Measurable Learning Objectives Empower Students (Learners) Design Principle 3: Assessment Is Meaningful and a Positive Learning Experience for Students (Learners) Design Principle 4: Students (Learners) Receive Rapid, Differentiated Support Design Principle 5: Learning Outcomes Emphasize Include Application and Creation of Knowledge You probably noticed that w inserted the word “Learners” in parenthesis wherever the word “Students” is listed.
  • 11. Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. 11 How do you assess learning? In an individualized learning environment, data and usually summative assessments are used to determine the progress an individual learner has made. This information determines where a learner may be placed and what strategies need to be deployed to improve his/her progress. Assessment OF and FOR learning may be used to determine learner performance and progress. In a differentiated learning environment, data and assessments are used to provide progress or performance information to the teacher so that instructional methods and materials can be modified for groups of learners and individual learners as needed. It also determines where a learner may be placed in the different groups of learners. Assessment OF and FOR Learning are applicable when differentiating instruction. In a personalized learning environment, the learner has the skills to self-assess their learning, to monitor their progress and to reflect on their learning using a variety of instruments and strategies. The learner often designs their own assessments with guidance from their teacher. The learner becomes motivated as they master their learning and gain skills to advance their own learning using assessment AS and FOR learning. The report Rethinking Classroom Assessment with Purpose in Mind shows the focus has been on assessment of learning where teachers measure student learning after the fact (Diagram 1). To ensure learners are acquiring essential skills such as self-regulation, a shift towards assessment as learning is required where learners evaluate and adapt their own learning (Diagram 2). British Columbia created an interactive discussion guide on Personalized Learning. On page 18 of the PDF guide, they state that “student assessment is the process of gathering evidence of what a student knows, understands and is able to do and determines how well they are achieving the learning outcomes.”
  • 12. Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. 12 Assessment OF Learning refers to strategies designed to confirm what learners know, demonstrate whether or not they have met curriculum outcomes or the goals of their individualized programs, or to certify proficiency and make decisions about learners’ future programs or placements. Effective Assessment OF Learning requires that teachers provide: ● a rationale for undertaking a particular assessment of learning at a particular point in time. ● clear descriptions of the intended learning. ● processes make it possible for learners to demonstrate their competence and skill. ● a range of alternative mechanisms for assessing the same outcomes. ● public and defensible reference points for making judgments. ● transparent approaches to interpretation. ● descriptions of the assessment process. ● strategies for recourse in the event of disagreement about the decisions. Assessment FOR Learning occurs throughout the learning process. It is interactive, with teachers: ● aligning instruction with the targeted outcomes. ● identifying particular learning needs of learners or groups. ● selecting and adapting materials and resources. ● creating differentiated teaching strategies and learning opportunities for helping individual learners move forward in their learning. ● providing immediate feedback and direction to learners. Assessment FOR Learning provides information about what learners already know and can do, so that teachers can design the most appropriate next steps in instruction. Assessment AS Learning is based in research about how learning happens, and is characterized by learners reflecting on their own learning and making adjustments so that they achieve deeper understanding. The teacher’s role in promoting the development of independent, expert learners through Assessment AS Learning is to: ● model and teach the skills of self-assessment. ● guide learners in setting goals, and monitoring their progress toward them. ● provide exemplars and models of good practice and quality work that reflect curriculum outcomes. ● work with learners to develop clear criteria of good practice. ● guide learners in developing internal feedback or self-monitoring mechanisms to validate and question their own thinking, and to become comfortable with the ambiguity and uncertainty that is inevitable in learning anything new. ● provide regular and challenging opportunities to practise, so that learners can become confident, competent self-assessors. ● monitor learners’ meta-cognitive processes as well as their learning, and provide descriptive feedback. ● create an environment where it is safe for learners to take chances and where support is readily available.
  • 13. Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. 13 Reporting in Assessment AS Learning is the responsibility of learners, who must learn to articulate and defend the nature and quality of their learning. When learners reflect on their own learning and must communicate it to others, they are intensifying their understanding about a topic, their own learning strengths, and the areas in which they need to develop further. We included Assessment OF, FOR, and AS Learning for a reason. Assessment has always been assumed to be the teacher’s responsibility. • Assessment OF Learning is when the teacher is analyzing data and summative assessments about a learner. The teacher is in control of the learning and the direction of instruction. The learner may not have an understanding of their learning. • Assessment FOR Learning is when the teacher includes the learner in analyzing data and formative assessments, the teacher and learner are working together to support learning. • Assessment AS Learning personalizes learning because the learner is monitoring and reflecting on their learning. This means the learner takes responsibility for their learning. Assessment AS Learning is a fundamental shift in thinking around teaching, learning, and assessment. “I am still learning.” Michelangelo References ● Image on cover from Mid-Pacific Institute’s One-on-One Program http://www.midpac.edu/one-to-one/ ● 2010 U.S. Education Technology Plan: http://www.ed.gov/technology/draft-netp- 2010/individualized-personalized-differentiated-instruction ● “Competency-Based Pathways” Google site developed by iNACOL staff. ● Personalized Learning in British Columbia: Interactive Discussion Guide. British Columbia Ministry of Education. (2011) http://www.personalizedlearningbc.ca ● Rethinking Classroom Assessment with Purpose in Mind: Assessment for Learning, Assessment as Learning, Assessment of Learning. The Crown in Right of Manitoba as represented by the Minister of Education, Citizenship and Youth. Manitoba Education, Citizenship and Youth. Winnipeg, Manitoba (2006). ● Rose, David & Meyer, Anne. Teaching Every Student in the Digital Age. CAST. (ASCD, 2002) ● Tomlinson, Carol. Differentiation Central: Differentiationcentral.com ● What is UDL? www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/whatisudl
  • 14. Personalization v Differentiation v Individualization Report v2 (2013) by Bray, B & McClaskey, K. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. 14 The Personalized Learning Chart (v2) and all derivatives of the chart along with adaptations of the explanations in this report by Barbara Bray and Kathleen McClaskey are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial- NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. Class Learning SnapshotTM and The Personal Learner ProfileTM are trademarks of Personalize Learning, LLC. If you have any questions, comments, want to make copies or changes to the chart, include the chart in a publication, want us to write about how you are using the chart, or would like us to help you personalize learning, contact us personalizelearn@gmail.com and visit our website for more information and resources: www.personalizelearning.com