California Geological Survey – “Probabilistic Tsunami Modeling and Public Pol...
The application of community resilience for disaster planning from national, state, and local perspectives - Chris Poland
1. Resilience Planning
The application of community resilience for
disaster planning from national, state, and local
perspectives.
Chris D. Poland, Moderator
Chairman and Senior Principal
Degenkolb Engineers
2013 EERI Annual Meeting
February 13, 2013
2. The Conversation
Introductory Remarks
Case Studies of Resilience Planning
Audience Provided Case Studies
General Open Discussion
Suggestions to EERI for the Resilience
Observatory
Resilience Planning -- 2013 EERI Annual Meeting
3. Goal:
Resilient Communities
• A Resilient Community can take “the Punch” of
an event and through preparedness and the
impromptu response of those affected, recover
quickly.
• Goal is to save the people, their neighborhoods,
their cultural heritage and their local economy.
• Earthquake Professionals have a contribution to
make to every aspect.
Resilience Planning -- 2013 EERI Annual Meeting
4. Resilient Communities
Requires a Holistic Approach before and
after the event
• Human Resilience is the engine
• Infrastructure Resilience is the foundation
• Recovery governance sets the pace and
direction
• Financial Resources are the fuel
Requires public education, interim governance models,
financial planning and performance based
engineering.
Resilience Planning -- 2013 EERI Annual Meeting
5. Public Education
Human Resilience: Knowing what may
happen, how to respond, and deciding to “tip-
in” and contribute to the recovery. Damage
must be expected and recovery possible.
Understand the earthquake potential
Understand what will happen to their
homes, neighborhoods, jobs, and
businesses
Have plans for immediate response and for
long term recovery
Able to “shelter-in-place” and help out
Resilience Planning -- 2013 EERI Annual Meeting
6. Recovery Governance
Core functions of government
• Provide vision and leadership for recovery and rebuilding
• Restoring public facilities and services
• Provide resources and information
Why is it different than business as usual?
• Time compression
• Scale
• Tension between rebuilding quickly and deliberately
1
Resilience Planning -- 2013 EERI Annual Meeting
7. Governance
Need to do
• Predefine a transitional form of governance
• Maintain current land use plans that include
what can be done better. Deal with
liquefaction, landslide, and faulting zones
• Develop reconstruction codes and standards
• Develop a new generation of communication
• Identify mechanisms for financing rebuilding
Resilience Planning -- 2013 EERI Annual Meeting
8. Finance
Available Sources
• Personal Savings
• Insurance
• NGO Community
• Banks and investors
• Business
• Federal Government
Resilience Planning -- 2013 EERI Annual Meeting
9. Performance Based Engineering
• Transparent Hazard Definitions
• Transparent Performance Measures for
Buildings
• Transparent Performance Measures for
Lifelines
• Performance Goals that support response and
recovery
Resilience Planning -- 2013 EERI Annual Meeting
11. Case Studies of Resilience Planning
Chris Poland San Francisco’s Earthquake Safety
Improvement Program and the Soft Story Legislation
Jason Biermann Snohomish County Emergency
Planning initiative to create a pre-disaster recovery
framework.
Yumei Wang Oregon’s plans to build resilience
including in their Critical Energy Infrastructure
Susan Cutter NRC’s looking forward in the
report Disaster Resilience: A National Imperative
Resilience Planning -- 2013 EERI Annual Meeting
12. San Francisco Earthquake Safety
Improvement Program (ESIP)and
the Soft Story Legislation
Patrick Otellini and Laurence Kornfield
City and County of San Francisco
Presented by Chris Poland
13. 23 Years in the Making
Initiated by the 1989 Loma Prieta Earthquake
Mandated a UMB Ordinance and began
retrofitting/replacing City owned buildings
Influenced by the SPUR Resilient City Initiative
Amended the Community Safety Element of
the General plan
Developed a the Community Action Plan for
Seismic Safety (CAPSS) for privately owned
buildings
ESIP Established by Mayor Newsom in the City
Administrators Office
Resilience Planning -- 2013 EERI Annual Meeting
14. ESIP
September 2011
30 year program to
mitigate privately owned
buildings and prepare for
recovery.
Community developed and
supported
Provides a three step
approach
Resilience Planning -- 2013 EERI Annual Meeting
15. Includes 50 tasks and ESIP
three phases of effort
Start Up – High Risk
Implementation Critical
Implementation All other
Three step approach to
resilience.
Facilitate the market
Nudge the market
Retrofit y deadline
Recommended Action
Mandatory Evaluation
Mandatory Retrofit
Resilience Planning -- 2013 EERI Annual Meeting
16. Soft Story Legislation
Mandatory retrofit
ordinance introduced with
7 year goal
Pre ’78, Wood Frame, 3+
stories, 5+ units
Mitigates one of the most
significant potential
impacts to San Francisco
Retrofit goal is shelter-in-
place
Resilience Planning -- 2013 EERI Annual Meeting
17. Companion Programs
Lifelines Council
Neighborhood Empowerment Network
Neighborhood Emergency Response Teams
Resilient San Francisco Initiative
Capital Planning Program
Building Occupancy Resumption Program
Community Engagement
Give2SF
SF Community Agencies Responding to Disasters
SF Ready
Vial of Life
72 hours.org
Resilience Planning -- 2013 EERI Annual Meeting
Thank you for join us this morning Been talking about Resilience for a long time, beyond arguing about definitions Talk about what we are doing Get ready, this is intended to be a discussion
Human resilience requires capacity building and addressing the social needs of disadvantaged, elderly, physically and mentally challenged to get tipping in to support recovery Infrastructure – 16 lifelines, structures, food, healthcare, financial services, Governance - EOC, transition, normal, recover to a new city, reuse and urban infill, transit Finance including incentives - incentives are about the community payig for saving the community
For the workforce to stay, damage and disruption must be expected short term recovery must appear to be possible Must be transparent and understandable To be short term , must be able to shelter in place About capacity building
Post event, the core functions are reduced to the necessities Best to have operational public facilities – then services follow Need a constant flow of credible and accurate information social media, mine for data, drowned out the miss-information Times goes from weeks to minutes, permits to repair or demolish balance public input with the need to rebuild quickly
EOC is fast paced, without regard to cost or impact, about security, health and safety Need an interim, transitional form of governance Sort out interaction of cities, counties, regions and state responsibilities Post event is no time to re-plan the city, up-to-date plans must be in place and ready to implement – no NZ in the US, maybe some ATC has published for CAPPS a reconstruction guideline based on disproportionate damage, ICC? Taping into Social Media is beyond me…..opportunities re endless Can’t expect government to finance, but they should be the resource and facilitator
Thinking about financing Don’t overlook personal savings and sweat equity Insurance is good, but NZ has an interesting twist. NGO’s rush to the rescue, philanthropy, but need to be coordinated with recovery programs. Shelter in place neighborhoods Banks and Investors are looking for financially viable opportunities, make those available asap. PPP’s Big business wants to help, Chambers of commerce serve small business, Business Civic leadership Center coordinates in kind services.
Build for the expected, plan to respond to the extreme