SlideShare uma empresa Scribd logo
1 de 12
Baixar para ler offline
Tracking Secondary AVID
Students into Higher Education
FY2009 H.S. Graduates
SES by AVID Participation
60%
36% 33%37%
61%
66%
3% 2% 1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
No AVID 2 or less years of
AVID
3 or more Years
of AVID
No Economic
Disadvantage
Economic Disadvantage
UnKnown
The No AVID category contains all other FY2009 Texas Public H.S. graduates who did
not participate in AVID.
Ethnic Origin by AVID Participation
14%
25% 28%
4% 2% 3%
44%
14%
9%
38%
58% 60%
* * *
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
No AVID 2 or less years of
AVID
3 or more Years
of AVID
African-American
Asian
European-American
Hispanic
Native American
The No AVID category contains all other FY2009 H.S. graduate who did not participate
in AVID.
At-Risk Status by AVID Participation
42%
50%
45%
54%
48%
55%
3% 2% 1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
No AVID 2 or less years of
AVID
3 or more Years of
AVID
At-Risk
Not At-Risk
UnKnown
The No AVID category contains all other FY2009 H.S. graduate who did not participate
in AVID.
H.S. Diploma Type by AVID
Participation
12%
9% 11%
70%
85% 87%
15%
6%
2%3% * *
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
No AVID 2 or less years of
AVID
3 or more Years of
AVID
Distinguished
Recommended
Minimum
IEP
The No AVID category contains all other FY2009 H.S. graduate who did not participate
in AVID.
Typical H.S. Graduate in FY2008
The Typical Non-AVID H.S.
Graduate
• European-American
• Not At-Risk (TEA)
• No economic disadvantage
• Received a Recommended
H.S. Degree
The Typical AVID H.S. Graduate
• Hispanic
• At-Risk (TEA)
• Economic Disadvantage
• Received a Recommended
H.S. Degree
Based the highest percentage in each category.
Tracking AVID Students into Higher
Education
• AVID H.S. Graduates were matched to Non-AVID
H.S. Graduates on six demographic and 2
assessment variables.
– Diploma Type
– Gender
– SES
– Ethnic Origin
– At-Risk Status
– The ability to track students into H.E.
– TAKS ELA scale score
– TAKS Math scale score
HIGHER EDUCATION ENROLLMENT
AND PERSISTENCE
Higher Education Enrollment Fall 2009
by AVID Participation (N=9046)
54% 55%
67%
46% 45%
33%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
No AVID 2 or less years of
AVID
3 or more Years of
AVID
Fall 2009 Enrolled
Unknown
Students who could not be tracked into H.E. due to lack of identification numbers
were removed from the graph
Unknown means that the student could not be found in Texas Higher Education
Higher Education Enrollment Fall 2009 by AVID Participation by
Institution Type (N=9046)
41%
45%
53%
59%
55%
47%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
No AVID 2 or less years of
AVID
3 or more Years of
AVID
Universities
CTC's
Students who could not be tracked into H.E. due to lack of identification numbers
were removed from the graph
Only includes students enrolled in H.E. Fall 2009
One Year Persistence by AVID
Participation (N=5085)
75% 73%
79%
25% 27%
21%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
No AVID 2 or less years of
AVID
3 or more Years
of AVID
One Year Persistence
Unknown
*Only includes students who attended H.E. in Fall 2008 and were tracked to Fall 2009.
Students who could not be tracked into H.E. due to lack of identification numbers were removed from the
graph
Unknown means that the student could not be found in Texas Higher education
One Year Persistence by AVID Participation
(N=9046, Fall 2009 Unknown students
included)
40% 40%
53%
60% 60%
47%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
No AVID 2 or less years of
AVID
3 or more Years
of AVID
Fall to Fall Persistence
Unknown
Unknown means that the student could not be found in Texas Higher education
Students who could not be tracked into H.E. due to lack of identification numbers were removed
from the graph

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Destaque

Pequeñas técnicas para un día slow
Pequeñas técnicas para un día slowPequeñas técnicas para un día slow
Pequeñas técnicas para un día slowThomas Wallet
 
White Paper - CEVA-XM4 Intelligent Vision Processor
White Paper - CEVA-XM4 Intelligent Vision ProcessorWhite Paper - CEVA-XM4 Intelligent Vision Processor
White Paper - CEVA-XM4 Intelligent Vision ProcessorCEVA, Inc.
 
Web-conference - "La conduite du changement"
Web-conference - "La conduite du changement"Web-conference - "La conduite du changement"
Web-conference - "La conduite du changement"XL Groupe
 
Webconférence - Démarche Excellence Opérationnelle Groupe
Webconférence - Démarche Excellence Opérationnelle GroupeWebconférence - Démarche Excellence Opérationnelle Groupe
Webconférence - Démarche Excellence Opérationnelle GroupeXL Groupe
 
A la découverte du GS2210-24LP
A la découverte du GS2210-24LPA la découverte du GS2210-24LP
A la découverte du GS2210-24LPZyxel France
 

Destaque (8)

Resume (SORA, Ivy)
Resume (SORA, Ivy)Resume (SORA, Ivy)
Resume (SORA, Ivy)
 
Pequeñas técnicas para un día slow
Pequeñas técnicas para un día slowPequeñas técnicas para un día slow
Pequeñas técnicas para un día slow
 
White Paper - CEVA-XM4 Intelligent Vision Processor
White Paper - CEVA-XM4 Intelligent Vision ProcessorWhite Paper - CEVA-XM4 Intelligent Vision Processor
White Paper - CEVA-XM4 Intelligent Vision Processor
 
Academic Skills
Academic Skills Academic Skills
Academic Skills
 
StrengthsFinder 2.0
StrengthsFinder 2.0StrengthsFinder 2.0
StrengthsFinder 2.0
 
Web-conference - "La conduite du changement"
Web-conference - "La conduite du changement"Web-conference - "La conduite du changement"
Web-conference - "La conduite du changement"
 
Webconférence - Démarche Excellence Opérationnelle Groupe
Webconférence - Démarche Excellence Opérationnelle GroupeWebconférence - Démarche Excellence Opérationnelle Groupe
Webconférence - Démarche Excellence Opérationnelle Groupe
 
A la découverte du GS2210-24LP
A la découverte du GS2210-24LPA la découverte du GS2210-24LP
A la découverte du GS2210-24LP
 

Mais de Colby Stoever

Qualtrics Introduction
Qualtrics IntroductionQualtrics Introduction
Qualtrics IntroductionColby Stoever
 
Nursing Outcome Measure 12-3-2013
Nursing Outcome Measure 12-3-2013Nursing Outcome Measure 12-3-2013
Nursing Outcome Measure 12-3-2013Colby Stoever
 
Logic Models Training
Logic Models TrainingLogic Models Training
Logic Models TrainingColby Stoever
 
Developmental Education Program Survey (DEPS)
Developmental Education Program Survey (DEPS)Developmental Education Program Survey (DEPS)
Developmental Education Program Survey (DEPS)Colby Stoever
 
First Learning Community Presentation Final 10-23-2012
First Learning Community Presentation Final 10-23-2012 First Learning Community Presentation Final 10-23-2012
First Learning Community Presentation Final 10-23-2012 Colby Stoever
 
The Institutional Context For QEP Kick-Off Meeting
The Institutional Context For QEP Kick-Off MeetingThe Institutional Context For QEP Kick-Off Meeting
The Institutional Context For QEP Kick-Off MeetingColby Stoever
 
Texas Pathways Granters Presentation
Texas Pathways Granters PresentationTexas Pathways Granters Presentation
Texas Pathways Granters PresentationColby Stoever
 
Institutional Research and Regression
Institutional Research and RegressionInstitutional Research and Regression
Institutional Research and RegressionColby Stoever
 
Using Multiple Tools to Create Dashboards
Using Multiple Tools to Create DashboardsUsing Multiple Tools to Create Dashboards
Using Multiple Tools to Create DashboardsColby Stoever
 
Data Analyst December 2012
Data Analyst  December 2012Data Analyst  December 2012
Data Analyst December 2012Colby Stoever
 
Executive Director of Institutional Research June 2013 to October 2016
Executive Director of Institutional Research June 2013 to October 2016Executive Director of Institutional Research June 2013 to October 2016
Executive Director of Institutional Research June 2013 to October 2016Colby Stoever
 

Mais de Colby Stoever (12)

Qualtrics Introduction
Qualtrics IntroductionQualtrics Introduction
Qualtrics Introduction
 
Nursing Outcome Measure 12-3-2013
Nursing Outcome Measure 12-3-2013Nursing Outcome Measure 12-3-2013
Nursing Outcome Measure 12-3-2013
 
Logic Models Training
Logic Models TrainingLogic Models Training
Logic Models Training
 
Developmental Education Program Survey (DEPS)
Developmental Education Program Survey (DEPS)Developmental Education Program Survey (DEPS)
Developmental Education Program Survey (DEPS)
 
First Learning Community Presentation Final 10-23-2012
First Learning Community Presentation Final 10-23-2012 First Learning Community Presentation Final 10-23-2012
First Learning Community Presentation Final 10-23-2012
 
The Institutional Context For QEP Kick-Off Meeting
The Institutional Context For QEP Kick-Off MeetingThe Institutional Context For QEP Kick-Off Meeting
The Institutional Context For QEP Kick-Off Meeting
 
Texas Pathways Granters Presentation
Texas Pathways Granters PresentationTexas Pathways Granters Presentation
Texas Pathways Granters Presentation
 
Institutional Research and Regression
Institutional Research and RegressionInstitutional Research and Regression
Institutional Research and Regression
 
SAS for Beginners
SAS for BeginnersSAS for Beginners
SAS for Beginners
 
Using Multiple Tools to Create Dashboards
Using Multiple Tools to Create DashboardsUsing Multiple Tools to Create Dashboards
Using Multiple Tools to Create Dashboards
 
Data Analyst December 2012
Data Analyst  December 2012Data Analyst  December 2012
Data Analyst December 2012
 
Executive Director of Institutional Research June 2013 to October 2016
Executive Director of Institutional Research June 2013 to October 2016Executive Director of Institutional Research June 2013 to October 2016
Executive Director of Institutional Research June 2013 to October 2016
 

Tracking Secondary AVID Students into Higher Educationfy2009

  • 1. Tracking Secondary AVID Students into Higher Education FY2009 H.S. Graduates
  • 2. SES by AVID Participation 60% 36% 33%37% 61% 66% 3% 2% 1% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% No AVID 2 or less years of AVID 3 or more Years of AVID No Economic Disadvantage Economic Disadvantage UnKnown The No AVID category contains all other FY2009 Texas Public H.S. graduates who did not participate in AVID.
  • 3. Ethnic Origin by AVID Participation 14% 25% 28% 4% 2% 3% 44% 14% 9% 38% 58% 60% * * * 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% No AVID 2 or less years of AVID 3 or more Years of AVID African-American Asian European-American Hispanic Native American The No AVID category contains all other FY2009 H.S. graduate who did not participate in AVID.
  • 4. At-Risk Status by AVID Participation 42% 50% 45% 54% 48% 55% 3% 2% 1% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% No AVID 2 or less years of AVID 3 or more Years of AVID At-Risk Not At-Risk UnKnown The No AVID category contains all other FY2009 H.S. graduate who did not participate in AVID.
  • 5. H.S. Diploma Type by AVID Participation 12% 9% 11% 70% 85% 87% 15% 6% 2%3% * * 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% No AVID 2 or less years of AVID 3 or more Years of AVID Distinguished Recommended Minimum IEP The No AVID category contains all other FY2009 H.S. graduate who did not participate in AVID.
  • 6. Typical H.S. Graduate in FY2008 The Typical Non-AVID H.S. Graduate • European-American • Not At-Risk (TEA) • No economic disadvantage • Received a Recommended H.S. Degree The Typical AVID H.S. Graduate • Hispanic • At-Risk (TEA) • Economic Disadvantage • Received a Recommended H.S. Degree Based the highest percentage in each category.
  • 7. Tracking AVID Students into Higher Education • AVID H.S. Graduates were matched to Non-AVID H.S. Graduates on six demographic and 2 assessment variables. – Diploma Type – Gender – SES – Ethnic Origin – At-Risk Status – The ability to track students into H.E. – TAKS ELA scale score – TAKS Math scale score
  • 9. Higher Education Enrollment Fall 2009 by AVID Participation (N=9046) 54% 55% 67% 46% 45% 33% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% No AVID 2 or less years of AVID 3 or more Years of AVID Fall 2009 Enrolled Unknown Students who could not be tracked into H.E. due to lack of identification numbers were removed from the graph Unknown means that the student could not be found in Texas Higher Education
  • 10. Higher Education Enrollment Fall 2009 by AVID Participation by Institution Type (N=9046) 41% 45% 53% 59% 55% 47% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% No AVID 2 or less years of AVID 3 or more Years of AVID Universities CTC's Students who could not be tracked into H.E. due to lack of identification numbers were removed from the graph Only includes students enrolled in H.E. Fall 2009
  • 11. One Year Persistence by AVID Participation (N=5085) 75% 73% 79% 25% 27% 21% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% No AVID 2 or less years of AVID 3 or more Years of AVID One Year Persistence Unknown *Only includes students who attended H.E. in Fall 2008 and were tracked to Fall 2009. Students who could not be tracked into H.E. due to lack of identification numbers were removed from the graph Unknown means that the student could not be found in Texas Higher education
  • 12. One Year Persistence by AVID Participation (N=9046, Fall 2009 Unknown students included) 40% 40% 53% 60% 60% 47% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% No AVID 2 or less years of AVID 3 or more Years of AVID Fall to Fall Persistence Unknown Unknown means that the student could not be found in Texas Higher education Students who could not be tracked into H.E. due to lack of identification numbers were removed from the graph