The Common European Frame of Reference for Languages
The essays were graded using a rubric to assess: Language & Style Good range of vocabulary and grammar Clear and concise Only a few errors Organization Well written thesis Organization is clear Good topic and concluding sentences Logically presented details Correct MLA and formatting Content Very focused Very clear main idea Very interesting Well supported Answers the prompt well
The essays were graded using a rubric to assess: Language & Style Good range of vocabulary and grammar Clear and concise Only a few errors Organization Well written thesis Organization is clear Good topic and concluding sentences Logically presented details Correct MLA and formatting Content Very focused Very clear main idea Very interesting Well supported Answers the prompt well
used in Arnold et al. 2009
4 groups had more stylistic than formal changes
4 groups had more stylistic than formal changes
41% were unsure if it improved their writing overall Content, style, 25% unsure Language 37% unsure
There were 2 questions about the roles did it help everyone contribute equally and did it make collaboration harder/ 25% Thought the roles made it harder 25% were unsure. For the = participation, people either agreed or disagreed.
used in Arnold et al. 2009
used in Arnold et al. 2009 she calls these stylistic changes . including paraphrases, deletions that require the reading to make inferences, additions that make things more explicit, substitute words of equal meaning, rearrange phrases without changing the meaning, length or shorten ideas Substitution was often for a better word get -> become
used in Arnold et al. 2009 she calls these stylistic changes . including paraphrases, deletions that require the reading to make inferences, additions that make things more explicit, substitute words of equal meaning, rearrange phrases without changing the meaning, length or shorten ideas Substitution was often for a better word get -> become