JRuby: The Hard Parts

Subverting the JVM
All the tricks, hacks, and kludges we’ve use to make

JRuby the best off-JVM language impl around.

Intro
• Charles Oliver Nutter

• Principal Software Engineer

• Red Hat, JBoss Polyglot Group

• @headius

• headius@headius.com

Welcome!
• My favorite event of the year

• I’ve only missed one!

• I will quickly talk through JRuby challenges

• Not a comprehensive list. Buy me a beer.

• Rest of you can help solve them

Ruby
• Dynamic, object-oriented language

• Created in 90s byYukihiro Matsumoto

• “matz”

• Matz’s Ruby Interpreter (MRI)

• Inspired by Python, Perl, Lisp, Smalltalk

• Memes:TMTOWTDI, MINASWAN, CoC,

# Output "I love Ruby"!
say = "I love Ruby"!
puts say!
!
# Output "I *LOVE* RUBY"!
say['love'] = "*love*"!
puts say.upcase!
!
# Output "I *love* Ruby"!
# five times!
5.times { puts say }!

JRuby
• Ruby for the JVM and JVM for the Ruby

• Started in 2001, dozens of contribs

• Usually the fastest Ruby

• At least 20 paid full-time man years in it

• Sun Microsystems, EngineYard, Red Hat

Making It Go (Fast)
• Parser-generator hacks

• Multiple interpreters

• Multiple compilers

• JVM-speciﬁc tricks

Parsing Ruby
• Yacc/Bison-based parse.y, almost 12kloc

• Very complex, not context-free

• No known 100% correct parser that is
notYACC-based

JRuby’s Parser
• Jay parser generator

• Maybe 5 projects in the world use it

• Our version of parse.y = 4kloc

• Two pieces, one is for ofﬂine parsing

• Works ok, but…

Parser Problems!
• Array initialization > 65k bytecode

• Giant switch won’t JIT

• Outlining the case bodies: better

• Case bodies as runnables in machine: best

• org/jruby/parser/RubyParser$445.class

• Slow at startup (most important time!)

Interpreter
• At least four interpreters we’ve tried

• Original: visitor-based

• Modiﬁed: big switch rather than visitor

• Experimental: stackless instr-based

• Current: direct execution of AST

• Execution state on artiﬁcial stack

The New Way
• JRuby 9000 introduces a new IR

• Traditional-style compiler IR

• Register-based

• CFG, semantic analysis, type and constant
propagation, all that jazz

• Interpreter has proven it out…JIT next

Mixed-Mode
• JRuby has both interpreter and JIT

• Cost of generating JVM bytecode is high

• Our interpreter runs faster than JVM’s

• A jitted interpreter is (much) faster than
unjitted bytecode

Native Execution
• Early JIT compiler just translated AST

• Bare-minimum semantic analysis

• Eliminate artiﬁcial frame use

• One-off opto for frequent patterns

• Too unwieldy to evolve much

New IR JIT
• Builds off IR runtime

• Per-instruction bytecode gen is simple

• JVM frame is like inﬁnite register machine

• Potential to massively improve perf

• Early unboxing numbers…

Numeric loop performance
0
1.25
2.5
3.75
5
times faster than MRI 2.1
JRuby 1.7 Rubinius

Numeric loop performance
0
15
30
45
60
JRuby 1.7 Rubinius Trufﬂe Topaz 9k+unbox

mandelbrot(500)
0
10
20
30
40
JRuby 9k + indy JRuby 9k + unboxing JRuby 9k + Trufﬂe

Whither Trufﬂe?
• RubyTrufﬂe merged into JRuby

• Same licenses as rest of JRuby

• Chris Seaton continues to work on it

• Very impressive peak numbers

• Startup, steady-state…needs work

• Considering initial use for targeted opto

JVM Tricks
• Lack of class hierarchy analysis in JIT

• Manually split methods to beat limits

• Everything is an expression, so exception-
handling has to maintain current stack

• Tweaking JIT ﬂags will just make you sad

• Unsafe

IRubyObject
public RubyClass getMetaClass();
RubyBasicObject
private RubyClass metaClass;

public RubyClass getMetaClass() {

return metaClass;

}
RubyString RubyArray RubyObject
obj.getMetaClass()

public static RubyClass metaclass(IRubyObject object) { 
return object instanceof RubyBasicObject ? 
((RubyBasicObject)object).getMetaClass() : 
object.getMetaClass(); 
}

Compatibility
• Strings and Encodings

• IO

• Fibers

• Difﬁcult choices

Strings
• All arbitrary-width byte data is String

• Binary data and encoded text alike

• Many supported encodings

• j.l.String, char[] poor options

• Size, data integrity, behavioral differences

The First Big Decision
• We realized we needed a byte[] String

• Had been StringBuilder-based until then

• That meant a lot of porting…

• Regex engine (joni)

• Encoding subsystem (jcodings)

• Low-level IO + transcoding (in JRuby)

JOni
• Port of Oniguruma regex library

• Pluggable grammars + arbitrary encodings

• Bytecode engine (shallow call stack)

• Interruptible

• Re-forked as char[] engine for Nashorn

• https://github.com/jruby/joni

Data:‘a’-‘z’ in byte[]

Match /.*tuv(..)yz$/
0s
1.5s
3s
4.5s
6s
j.u.regex JOni

Data:‘a’-‘z’ from IO

Match /.*tuv(..)yz$/
0s
0.7s
1.4s
2.1s
2.8s
j.u.regex JOni

Jcodings
• Character tables

• Used heavily by JOni and JRuby

• Transcoding tables and logic

• Replaces Charset logic from JRuby 1.7

• https://github.com/jruby/jcodings

JRuby 9000
• Finished porting, connecting transcoders

• New port of IO operations

• Transcoding works directly against IO
buffers; hard to simulate other ways

• Lots of fun native (C) calls to emulate…

Fibers
• Coroutines, goroutines, continuations

• MRI uses stack-swapping

• And limits Fiber stack size as a result

• Useless as a concurrency model

• Useful for multiplexing operations

• Try read, no data, go to next ﬁber

Fibers on JRuby
• Yep, they’re just native threads

• Transfer perf with j.u.c utils is pretty close

• Resource load is very bad

• Spin-up time is bad without thread pool

• So early or occasional ﬁbers cost a lot

• Where are you, coro?!

Hard Decisions
• ObjectSpace walks heap, off by default

• Trace functions add overhead, off by default

• Full coroutines not possible

• C extension API too difﬁcult to emulate

• Perhaps only item to really hurt us

Native Integration
• Process control

• More selectable IO

• FFI layer

• C extension API

• Misc

Ruby’s Roots
• Matz is/was a C programmer

• Early Ruby did little more than stitch C
calls together

• Some of those roots remain

• ttys, fcntl, process control, IO, ext API

• We knew we needed a solution

JNA, and then JNR
• Started with jna-posix to map POSIX

• stat, symlink, etc needed to do basics

• JNR replaced JNA

• Wayne Meissner started his empire…

The Cancer
• Many off-platform runtimes are not as good
as Hotspot

• Many of their users must turn to C for perf

• So, since many people use C exts on MRI,
maybe we need to implement it?

• Or get a student to do it…

MRI C Extensions
• Very invasive API

• Direct pointer access, object internals,
conservative GC, threading constraints

• Like bridging one JNI to another

• Experimental in JRuby 1.6, gone in 1.7

• Will not revisit unless new API

FFI
• Ruby API/DSL for binding C libs

• Additional tools for generating that code

• If you need to go native, it’s the best way

• In use in production JRuby apps

• ØMQ client, bson lib, sodium crypto, …

Ruby FFI example
class Timeval < FFI::Struct!
  layout :tv_sec => :ulong,!
:tv_usec => :ulong!
end!
!
module LibC!
  extend FFI::Library!
  ffi_lib FFI::Library::LIBC!
  attach_function :gettimeofday,!
[ :pointer, :pointer ],!
:int!
end!
!
t = Timeval.new!
LibC.gettimeofday(t.pointer, nil)

Layered Runtime
jffi
jnr-ffi
libffi
jnr-posix

jnr-constants
!
jnr-enxio
jnr-x86asm
jnr-unixsocket
etc etc

Native in JRuby
• POSIX stuff missing from Java

• Ruby FFI DSL for binding C libs

• Stdio

• selection, remove buffering, control tty

• Process launching and control

• !!!!!!

Process Control
• Java’s ProcessBuilder/Process are bad

• No channel access (no select!)

• Spins up at least one thread per process

• Drains child output ahead of you

• New process API based on posix_spawn

in_c, in_p = IO.pipe
out_p, out_c = IO.pipe
!
pid = spawn('cat -n',
:in => in_c,
:out => out_c,
:err => 'error.log')
!
[in_c, out_c].each(&:close)
!
in_p.puts("hello, world")
in_p.close
!
puts out_p.read # => " 1 hello, world"
!
Process.waitpid(pid)

Usability
• Backtraces

• Command-line and launchers

• Startup time

Backtraces
• JVM backtraces make Rubyists’ eyes bleed

• Initially, Ruby trace maintained manually

• JIT emits mangled class to produce a Ruby
trace element

• AOT produces single class, mangled
method name

• Mixed-mode backtraces!

at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.CachedMethod.invoke(CachedMethod.java:86)
at groovy.lang.MetaMethod.doMethodInvoke(MetaMethod.java:234)
at groovy.lang.MetaClassImpl.invokeMethod(MetaClassImpl.java:1061)
at groovy.lang.ExpandoMetaClass.invokeMethod(ExpandoMetaClass.java:910)
at groovy.lang.Closure.call(Closure.java:279)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.DefaultGroovyMethods.callClosureForMapEntry(DefaultGroovyMet
hods.java:1911)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.DefaultGroovyMethods.each(DefaultGroovyMethods.java:
1184)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.dgm$88.invoke(Unknown Source)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.PojoMetaMethodSite
$PojoMetaMethodSiteNoUnwrapNoCoerce.invoke(PojoMetaMethodSite.java:270)
at
org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.PojoMetaMethodSite.call(PojoMetaMethodSite.java:52)
at org.codehaus.groovy.runtime.callsite.AbstractCallSite.call(AbstractCallSite.java:
124)
at BootStrap.populateBootstrapData(BootStrap.groovy:786)
at BootStrap.this$2$populateBootstrapData(BootStrap.groovy)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at
sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
at org.codehaus.groovy.reflection.CachedMethod.invoke(CachedMethod.java:86)
at groovy.lang.MetaMethod.doMethodInvoke(MetaMethod.java:234)
at

at org.jruby.javasupport.JavaMethod.invokeStaticDirect(JavaMethod.java:362)

at org.jruby.java.invokers.StaticMethodInvoker.call(StaticMethodInvoker.java:50)

at org.jruby.runtime.callsite.CachingCallSite.cacheAndCall(CachingCallSite.java:306)

at org.jruby.runtime.callsite.CachingCallSite.call(CachingCallSite.java:136)

at org.jruby.ast.CallNoArgNode.interpret(CallNoArgNode.java:60)

at org.jruby.ast.NewlineNode.interpret(NewlineNode.java:105)

at org.jruby.ast.RootNode.interpret(RootNode.java:129)

at org.jruby.evaluator.ASTInterpreter.INTERPRET_EVAL(ASTInterpreter.java:95)

at org.jruby.evaluator.ASTInterpreter.evalWithBinding(ASTInterpreter.java:184)

at org.jruby.RubyKernel.evalCommon(RubyKernel.java:1158)

at org.jruby.RubyKernel.eval19(RubyKernel.java:1121)

at org.jruby.RubyKernel$INVOKER$s$0$3$eval19.call(RubyKernel$INVOKER$s$0$3$eval19.gen)

at org.jruby.internal.runtime.methods.DynamicMethod.call(DynamicMethod.java:210)

at org.jruby.internal.runtime.methods.DynamicMethod.call(DynamicMethod.java:206)

at java.lang.invoke.MethodHandle.invokeWithArguments(MethodHandle.java:599)

at org.jruby.runtime.invokedynamic.InvocationLinker.invocationFallback(InvocationLinker.java:155)

at ruby.__dash_e__.method__1$RUBY$bar(-e:1)



at ruby.__dash_e__.block_0$RUBY$foo(-e:1)

at ruby$__dash_e__$block_0$RUBY$foo.call(ruby$__dash_e__$block_0$RUBY$foo)

at org.jruby.runtime.CompiledBlock19.yieldSpecificInternal(CompiledBlock19.java:117)

at org.jruby.runtime.CompiledBlock19.yieldSpecific(CompiledBlock19.java:92)

at org.jruby.runtime.Block.yieldSpecific(Block.java:111)

at org.jruby.RubyFixnum.times(RubyFixnum.java:275)



at ruby.__dash_e__.method__0$RUBY$foo(-e:1)



at ruby.__dash_e__.__file__(-e:1)

• org.jruby.RubyFixnum.times

• org.jruby.evaluator.ASTInterpreter.INTERPRET_EVAL

• rubyjit.Object$
$foo_3AB1F5052668B3CD74A0B4CD4999CF6A65E9
2973271627940.__ﬁle__

• ruby.__dash_e__.method__0$RUBY$foo

Command Line
• Rubyists typically are at CLI

• Command line and tty must behave

• Epic bash and .bat scripts

• 300-500 lines of heinous shell script

• Unusable in shebang lines

• Repurposed NetBeans native launcher

system ~/projects/jruby $ time bin/jruby.bash -v
jruby 9000.dev-SNAPSHOT (2.1.2) 2014-07-27 9cca1ec Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 24.45-b08 on
1.7.0_45-b18 [darwin-x86_64]
!
real 0m0.126s
user 0m0.092s
sys 0m0.031s
!
system ~/projects/jruby $ time bin/jruby.bash -v
1.7.0_45-b18 [darwin-x86_64]
!
real 0m0.124s
user 0m0.089s
sys 0m0.033s
!
system ~/projects/jruby $ time jruby -v
1.7.0_45-b18 [darwin-x86_64]
!
real 0m0.106s
user 0m0.080s
sys 0m0.022s
!
system ~/projects/jruby $ time jruby -v
1.7.0_45-b18 [darwin-x86_64]
!
real 0m0.110s
user 0m0.085s
sys 0m0.023s

Console Support
• Rubyists also typically use REPLs

• Readline support is a must

• jline has been forked all over the place

• Looking into JNA-based readline now

CLI == Startup Time
• BY FAR the #1 complaint

• May be the only reason we haven’t won!

• We’re trying everything we can

JRuby Startup
-e 1
gem --help
rake -T
Time in seconds (lower is better)
0 2.5 5 7.5 10
C Ruby JRuby

Tweaking Flags
• -client mode

• -XX:+TieredCompilation -XX:TieredStopAtLevel=1

• -X-C to disable JRuby’s compiler

• Heap sizes, code veriﬁcation, etc etc

Nailgun?
• Keep a single JVM running in background

• Toss commands over to it

• It stays hot, so code starts faster

• Hard to clean up all state (e.g. threads)

• Can’t get access to user’s terminal

• http://www.martiansoftware.com/nailgun/

Drip
Isolated JVM
ApplicationCommand #1
Isolated JVM
Isolated JVM

Drip
• Start a new JVM after each command

• Pre-boot JVM plus optional code

• Analyze command line for differences

• Age out unused instances

• https://github.com/ﬂatland/drip

Drip Init
• Give Drip some code to pre-boot

• Load more libraries

• Warm up some code

• Pre-execution initialization

• Run as much as possible in background

• We also pre-load ./dripmain.rb if exists

$ cat dripmain.rb
# Preload some code Rails always needs
require File.expand_path('../config/application', __FILE__)

JRuby Startup
rake -T
Time in seconds (lower is better)
0 2.5 5 7.5 10
C Ruby JRuby JRuby (best)
JRuby (drip) JRuby (drip init) JRuby (dripmain)

Hard Parts
• 64k bytecode limit

• Falling over JIT limits

• String char[] pain

• Startup and warmup

• Coroutines

• FFI at JVM level

• Too many ﬂags

• Tiered compiler slow

• Interpreter opto

• Bytecode is a blunt tool

• Indy has taken too long

• Charlie may burn out

ThankYou!
• Charles Oliver Nutter

• @headius

• headius@headius.com

• http://blog.headius.com

JRuby: The Hard Parts

Recomendados

Recomendados

Mais conteúdo relacionado

Mais procurados

Mais procurados (20)

Destaque

Destaque (7)

Semelhante a JRuby: The Hard Parts

Semelhante a JRuby: The Hard Parts (20)

Mais de Charles Nutter

Mais de Charles Nutter (20)

Último

Último (20)

JRuby: The Hard Parts