You may be wondering “Did Angelina Jolie Have Breast Reduction” ? You can say thanks next to you see Angelina Jolie for keeping the wool pulled over the eyes of women everywhere while selling out to for-profit, monopolistic, corporate interests that incessantly seek to exploit women for profit. There’s more to this story than just the patents on BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Angelina Jolie is also using blatantly misleading statistics to terrify women into thinking their breasts might kill them. Yet thanks to people like Jolie and the fear-mongering mainstream media, women all across the nation have been terrified into believing their breasts might kill them and the best way to handle the problem is to cut them off! This, my friends, is the essence of doomsday fear mongering. This issue affects less than one-tenth of one percent of women but is being riled up into a nationwide fear campaign that just happens to feed profits into the for-profit cancer diagnosis and treatment industry, not to mention the monopolistic human gene patenting cartels. That’s the real story of what’s happening here. Don’t expect to read this in the New York Times. OK Back to the Story Did Angelina Jolie Have Breast Reduction ? Angelina Jolie’s announcement of undergoing a double mastectomy (surgically removing both breasts) even though she had no breast cancer is not the innocent, spontaneous, “heroic choice” that has been portrayed in the mainstream media. I just learned it all coincides with a well-timed for-profit corporate P.R. campaign that has been planned for months and just happens to coincide with the upcoming U.S. Supreme Court decision on the viability of the BRCA1 patent. This is the investigation the mainstream media refuses to touch. Here, I explain the corporate financial ties, investors, mergers, human gene patents, lawsuits, medical fear mongering and the trillions of dollars that are at stake here. If you pull back the curtain on this one, you find far more than an innocent looking woman exercising a “choice.” This is about protecting trillions in profits through the deployment of carefully-crafted public relations campaigns designed to manipulate the public opinion of women. The signs were all there from the beginning of the scheme: Angelina Jolie’s highly polished and obviously corporate-written op-ed piece at the New York Times, the carefully-crafted talking points invoking “choice” as a politically-charged keyword, and the obvious coaching of even her husband Brad Pitt who carefully describes the entire experience using words like “stronger” and “pride” and “family.” But the smoking gun is the fact that Angelina Jolie’s seemingly spontaneous announcement magically appeared on the cover of People Magazine this week — a magazine that is usually finalized for publication three weeks before it appears on newsstands. Tags: Angelina's Jolie's announcement, BRCA, brca ethnicity, b

1. http://www.empowernetwork.com/awesomeleads/blog/did-angelina-jolie-have-breast-reduction-brca-gene-breast-cancer-
scheme-billions/
May 17, 2013
Did Angelina Jolie Have Breast Reduction ? | BRCA Gene
Breast Cancer Scheme Billions
You may be wondering “Did Angelina Jolie Have Breast Reduction” ?
You can say thanks next to you see Angelina Jolie for keeping the wool pulled over the eyes of
women everywhere while selling out to for-profit, monopolistic, corporate interests that
incessantly seek to exploit women for profit.
There’s more to this story than just the patents on BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Angelina Jolie is
also using
blatantly misleading statistics to terrify women into thinking their breasts might kill them.
Yet thanks to people like Jolie and the
fear-mongering mainstream media,
women all across the nation have been
terrified into believing their breasts might
kill them and the best way to handle the
problem is to cut them off!
This, my friends, is the essence of
doomsday fear mongering. This issue
affects less than one-tenth of one
percent of women but is being riled up
into a nationwide fear campaign that
just happens to feed profits into the for-
profit cancer diagnosis and treatment
industry, not to mention the
monopolistic human gene patenting
cartels.
That’s the real story of what’s
happening here. Don’t expect to read
this in the New York Times.
OK Back to the Story Did
Angelina Jolie Have Breast
Reduction ?
Angelina Jolie’s announcement of
undergoing a double mastectomy
(surgically removing both breasts) even though she had no breast cancer is not the innocent,
spontaneous, “heroic choice” that has been portrayed in the mainstream media.
I just learned it all coincides with a well-timed
for-profit corporate P.R. campaign that has been planned for months and just happens to coincide

2. with the upcoming U.S. Supreme Court decision on the viability of the BRCA1 patent.
This is the investigation the mainstream media refuses to touch.
Here, I explain the corporate financial ties, investors, mergers, human gene patents, lawsuits,
medical fear mongering and the trillions of dollars that are at stake here.
If you pull back the curtain on this one, you find far more than an innocent looking woman
exercising a “choice.”
This is about protecting trillions in profits through the deployment of carefully-crafted public
relations campaigns designed to manipulate the public opinion of women.
The signs were all there from the beginning of the scheme: Angelina Jolie’s highly polished and
obviously corporate-written op-ed piece at the New York Times, the carefully-crafted talking
points invoking “choice” as a politically-charged keyword, and the obvious coaching of even her
husband Brad Pitt who carefully describes the entire experience using words like “stronger” and
“pride” and “family.”
But the smoking gun is the fact that Angelina Jolie’s seemingly spontaneous announcement
magically appeared on the cover of People Magazine this week — a magazine that is usually
finalized for publication three weeks before it appears on newsstands.
That cover, not surprisingly, uses the same language found in the NYT op-ed piece: “HER BRAVE
CHOICE” and “This was the right thing to do.” The flowery, pro-choice language is not a
coincidence.
Are you starting to see Why This was a False Flag yet again…
Angelina Jolie did not Have Breast Reduction! Why did we get Schemed
into this ?
What this proves is that Angelina’s Jolie’s announcement was
a well-planned corporate P.R. campaign with carefully-crafted messages designed to influence
public opinion. But what could Jolie be seeking to influence?
…how about trillions of dollars in corporate profits?
Upcoming U.S. Supreme Court decision to rule on patent viability for
BRCA1 gene in Favor of BRCA Gene Breast Cancer Scheme Billions
Angelina Jolie’s announcement and all its carefully-crafted language had four notable immediate
impacts:
1) It caused women everywhere to be terrified of breast cancer through the publishing of false
statistics that drove fear into the hearts of anyone with breasts. (See below for explanation.)
2) It caused women to rush out and seek BRCA1 gene testing procedures. These tests just
happen to be
patented by a for-profit corporation called “Myriad Genetics.” Because of this patent, BRCA1 tests
can cost $3,000 – $4,000 each. The testing alone is a multi-billion-dollar market, but only if the

3. patent is upheld in an upcoming Supreme Court decision (see below).
3) It caused the stock price of Myriad
Genetics (MYGN) to skyrocket to a 52-
week high. “Myriad’s stock closed up 3%
Tuesday, following the publication of
the New York Times op-ed,”
wrote Marketwatch.com.
4) It drove public opinion to influence the
upcoming U.S. Supreme Court decision
to rule in favor of corporate ownership
of human genes (see more below).
Women all over the world are being
duped into supporting Angeline Jolie
when she never really had a Breast
Reduction, having no idea that what
she’s really doing is selling out women
to the for-profit cancer industry. But to
fully understand what’s happening, you have to dig deeper…
Myriad Genetics sees stock price skyrocket thanks to Jolie, and
Obamacare will funnel billions their way
“Salt Lake City-based Myriad Genetics (MYGN) holds the patent on the test that determined the
actress had an 87% chance of developing breast cancer, as well as the genes themselves,” wrote
MarketWatch.com.
And that’s only the beginning. If the U.S. Supreme Court can be influenced to uphold Myriad’s
patent, it could mean a trillion-dollar industry over just the next few years. Even more, Myriad
Genetics is reportedly “ripe for mergers” according to the financial press, because it’s part of the
super-hot human genome industry.
“The world’s largest maker of DNA testing and analysis tools, Life Technologies Corp. said that it is
set to be acquired by Thermo Fisher Scientific for a record $13.6 billion,” writes MarketWatch.com.
“A race that kicked into high gear more than 26 years ago is heating up, with foreign governments
and corporations joining the U.S. in funding the quest to map all the human genomes. And even as
the recent flurry of mergers and acquisitions in the genomics space has spurred returns, investors
still have opportunities to profit from this multibillion-dollar industry.”
The higher Myriad’s stock price goes, the more profitable a merger becomes for its current owners.
So Jolie’s P.R. stunt just happened to generate unknown millions of dollars in value for the very
people who claim a patent monopoly over the breast cancer genes residing in the bodies of
women. Coincidence? Hardly.
Obamacare mandates taxpayers pay for BRCA gene testing: yet
another government handout to wealthy corporations
But here’s what’s even more crooked about all this: You know how Obama likes to talk “free
market” but actually engages in so-called “crony capitalism” by handing out money to all his
corporate buddies, Wall Street insiders and deep-pocketed campaign donors? Part of Obamacare

4. — the “Affordable Care Act” — mandates that
taxpayers pay for BRCA1 genetic testing!
Myriad Genetics, in other words, stands to receive a full-scale windfall of profits mandated by
government and pushed into mainstream consciousness through a campaign of “medical terror”
fronted by Angelina Jolie and the New York Times. Are you starting to see how this all fits
together yet?
This is all one big
coordinated corporate sellout of women, and it’s all being hidden by playing the “women’s power”
card and using “choice” language to more easily manipulate women. Angelina Jolie, remember, is a
key spokesperson for the United Nations, an organization already caught engaged in child sex
slavery and drug running. Although Jolie obviously isn’t engage in that sort of behavior, her job is
to covertly influence American women into supporting a carefully-planned, plotted and executed
corporate profit campaign that turns women’s bodies into profits.
Here’s why the Supreme Court decision puts trillions of dollars at stake…
Details on the upcoming Supreme Court decision to Scheme Billions
The ACLU and the Public Patent Foundation filed a lawsuit in 2009, challenging the corporate
ownership of human genes. Anyone who believes in women’s rights, human rights, civil rights or
even the right to eat non-GMO foods should immediately agree that
corporations should NOT be able to patent human genes and then use those patents to rake in
billions of dollars in profits while stifling scientific research into those genes.
A question to all women reading this: Do you believe a corporation in Utah owns your body? If not,
you should be opposed to corporate ownership of human genes. It also means you should oppose
Angelina Jolie’s P.R. campaign because although she’s running a brilliant public relations campaign,
behind the scenes her actions are feeding potentially trillions of dollars of profits directly into the
for-profit human gene patenting industry that denies human beings ownership over their own
genetic code.
The ACLU explains the basics of its lawsuit against Myriad Genetics as follows:
On May 12, 2009, the ACLU and the Public Patent Foundation (PUBPAT) filed a lawsuit charging
that patents on two human genes associated with breast and ovarian cancer, BRCA1 and BRCA2,
are unconstitutional and invalid. On November 30, 2012, the Supreme Court agreed to hear
argument on the patentability of human genes. The ACLU argued the case before the U.S. Supreme
Court on April 15, 2013.
We expect a decision this summer.
On behalf of researchers, genetic counselors, women patients, cancer survivors, breast cancer
and women’s health groups, and scientific associations representing 150,000 geneticists,
pathologists, and laboratory professionals, we have argued that human genes cannot be
patented because they are classic products of nature. The suit charges that the
gene patents violate the First Amendment and stifle diagnostic testing and research that could
lead to cures and that they limit women’s options regarding their medical care.

5. Got that? If the Supreme Court rules against Myriad Genetics, it will cause a multi-billion-dollar
breast cancer genetic testing industry to collapse virtually overnight. This means a huge loss for
not just Myriad, but also many other human gene corporations that wish to exploit the human
body — including the bodies of women — for monopolistic profits. (All patents are government-
granted monopolies.) Ultimately,
trillions of dollars in corporate gene patents are at stake here.
Patenting human genes is huge business
Today, about
20 percent of your genes are already patented by corporations and universities. As the ACLU
explains, “A gene patent holder has the right to prevent anyone from studying, testing or even
looking at a gene. As a result, scientific research and genetic testing has been delayed, limited or
even shut down due to concerns about gene patents.”
This means that when corporations own patents on human genes, it stifles scientific
research while granting that corporation a monopoly over the “intellectual property” encoded in
your own DNA! (How criminal is that? You decide…)
What this means is that if the Supreme Court rules against Myriad, it would set a precedent that
would
dismantle the entire human gene patenting industry, affecting trillions of dollars in future profits.
This, I believe, is the real reason behind Angelina Jolie’s announcement. It seems designed to
invoke women’s emotional reactions and create a groundswell of support for corporate-owned
genes, thereby handing these corporations a Supreme Court precedent that will ensure trillions in
future profits. It’s a for-profit PR stunt that tries to trick women into supporting a corporate
system of patents and monopolies that claims, right now, to own portions of the bodies of every
woman living today.
While most media outlets have no clue about the patent issues at stake here, the Detroit Free
Press took notice, saying:
“The Hollywood star’s decision to get tested for a breast cancer gene mutation, undergo a double
mastectomy and then write about it calls attention to a case now pending before the court. The
justices have just weeks to decide if Myriad Genetics’ patent on the two genes that can identify an
increased risk of breast and ovarian cancer is legal. Critics complain that the company’s monopoly
leaves them as the sole source of the $4,000 tests needed to determine each woman’s risk.”
Lying with statistics: Jolie’s 87% risk exaggeration
In the NYT op-ed piece, Jolie claims her doctor told her she has an “87% risk” of developing breast
cancer. But what she didn’t tell you is that this number doesn’t apply to the entire population: it’s
actually old data derived almost exclusively from families that were previously documented to
have very high risks of breast cancer to begin with.
A study published on the National Human Genome Research Institute website and conducted by
scientists from the National Institutes of Health reveals that breast cancer risks associated with
BRCA1 genes are significantly lower than what’s being hyped up by Jolie and the mainstream
media.

6. In fact, in a large room of 600 women,
only ONE will likely have a BRCA mutation in her genetic code. The actual incidence is 0.125 to 0.25
out of 100 women, or 1 in 400 to 1 in 800. I used 600 as the average of 400 and 800.
And out of that 1 in 600 women who has the mutation, her risk of breast cancer is only 56
percent, not 78 percent as claimed by Jolie. But 13 percent of women without the BRCA mutation
get breast cancer anyway, according to this scientific research, so the increased risk is just 43 out
of 100 women.
So what we’re really talking about here is 1 in 600 women having a BRCA gene mutation, then less
than half of those getting cancer because of it. In other words,
only about 1 in 1200 women will be affected by this.
Corporate media refuses to mention real prevention and treatment
options
As part of the breast cancer fear
mongering and treatment scam now
being run across the mainstream media,
nearly all media sources are prohibiting
any mention of holistic or natural
options for treatment or prevention.
Sure, the media talks about “options,”
but all those options just happen to lead
back to the for-profit cancer industry. As
an example, read this story by ABC
News, part of the lying mainstream
media that misinforms women and
pushes a corporate agenda:
If you do test positive for BRCA, you
have options, and you don’t necessarily
have to go the Jolie route. Some women
choose not to have surgery. Instead, they
increase cancer surveillance with
imaging tests. These include regular
mammograms to test for breast cancer,
and regular pelvic sonograms and blood-
tests to watch for ovarian cancer.
Nowhere in this article does ABC News
mention ways to suppress the BRCA1
gene by, for example, eating raw
cruciferous vegetables containing Indole-3-Carbinol (I3C), a potent anti-cancer nutrient that halts
breast cancer in its tracks. Nowhere does ABC News mention vitamin D which prevents nearly 4
out of 5 cancers of all types, including breast cancer.
Nope, the “options” being pushed by mainstream media are nothing more than mammograms,
surgery, radiation and chemotherapy — all owned and run by the for-profit cancer industry that

7. feeds on women and exploits their bodies for profit.
Nor is their any discussion of the total scam of the “pink ribbons” cancer cure industry which is
primarily focused on giving women cancer through “free mammograms.” As any scientist or
physicist already knows, mammograms cause cancer because they emit ionizing radiation directly
into the breast and heart tissues. Get enough mammograms done and sooner or later they will
detect breast cancer because they caused it! To date, 1.3 million women have been harmed by
mammography.
About The Author: Scott Raley
Like so many people, I grew tired of worrying how the bills would get paid every month.
I grew tired of working a job I didn't really enjoy, and that I knew would never create
the life I wanted and deserved. But there was nothing worse than going to bed every
night with the feeling that what I was reaching for, felt so far away. So I decided to do something
about it. Believe it or not, the decision alone did wonders for me. It gave me a feeling of control
and hope that I never felt working for somebody else! And now I know why. Working from home
has been an absolute blessing. It's taught me how to work smarter, rather than work harder. It's
helping me make more money, and at the same time create more time to enjoy it. It provides me
with an opportunity to meet people just like me, and help them create the life and lifestyle they
dream about. If you're friendly and have a goal in mind, I'd love to work with you. In fact, there's a
team of people behind me that devote every day of their lives to helping good people succeed
with this incredible opportunity. Whether you have a lot of experience or none at all… a lot of time
to invest or just a little… it's all good! Our company, our team, and our proven system work with
what you've got - and help you bring about the results you're looking for. If you have any
questions, contact me! If you have any concerns, let me know! If you're ready to go, I'm right there
with you! I'm also living proof that this business really can change your life! ***Exclusive BONUS
Coaching session with myself & David Wood aka the "The Guru Slayer" Reveals How To Make
$1,500 a day by Blogging. Email me at RetireWithScott@aweber.com for a free insider access to
this exclusive interview.***