I. 80% of Physicians own Smart Devices
II. Patient Needs
III. Apps
IV. Design Consideration
V. Security
VI. Areas of Focus for Imaging Leaders
VII. Patient Engagement
VIII. Imaging-Specific Portal
For more information visit http://www.carestream.com/myvue and http://www.carestream.com/vuemotion
3. What are your patients looking for?
3
Harris Interactive Poll 2012
4. Considerations: “To App or Not to App”
Consideration: Radiologist Reviewing Imaging Results
EITHER: Key is access to priors and image manipulation tools
NO APP for Referring: Primary care physicians and specialists will
likely view images and reports ad-hoc from wherever the image was
taken; Access will likely come through EMR/EHR.
Viewer needs to be: system and device agnostic, no download, no
training required
Consideration: Referring physicians accessing EMR
DEDICATED APP: Primary care physicians and specialists will likely
only access dedicated patient records in one system
Consideration: Patients accessing the EMR results
No APP: Portal part of Meaningful Use Requirement
5. p.5
Simple to deploy and maintain
• Zero overhead for high speed performance
• Latest enterprise access technology without replacing a legacy PACS or archive
On-demand and Ad-hoc
• Radiologists and physicians able to access entire patient’s portfolio including images,
reports and other supporting, non-DICOM data
• Enable real-time collaboration between clinical users
Easy to Adapt
• Simplify workflow as independent viewer or embedded within
EMR or HIS eliminating multiple log-ins
• Intuitive User Design that doesn’t require dedicated training
Physical Conditions
• Device durability, ambient lighting, security….
Overall Design Considerations
Vue Motion is FDA cleared for iPad mobile use
6. Security utmost concern
But consider the alternatives:
Applications should be part of an enterprise security architecture that
considers confidentiality, data integrity, and availability.
• Personal device (BYOD) versus corporately issued
• Theft and data loss
• Compliance to government regulations (i.e. FDA)
• Data retained on device (ex. dedicated app) or centralized on server (ex. zero footprint)
• Physical security “screens”
• External network accessed by unpredictable user patterns or demands
p.6
8. “Less paper work”
“Better care coordination among health care
providers
“Fewer unnecessary tests and procedures”
“Easy, electronic access to your medical
record and have greater control over
your health”
80% Americans who have access their
health information in electronic health
record use it
65% Americans who don’t’ have electronic
access to their health information say it’s
important to have it
2 out of 3 people would consider switching
to a physician who offers access to
medical records through a secure
internet connection
Patient Engagement has Operational Merits
8
Office of the National Coordinator for Health
Information Technology (ONC) is
generating the “demand”*
http://www.healthit.gov/patients-families/electronic-health-records-infographic
9. Example of an Imaging-Specific Portal
Secure access, simple management, quick access
10. Patient Reaction to Imaging Portal
10
Carestream conducted direct surveys to gauge patient
reaction (n=1000)
Preferred Access to Imaging Results
Likelihood of Using Online Portal