Presented by Mark Pletcher, MD, MPH, at UCSF's symposium "The Role of Risk Stratification and Biomarkers in Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease" in Jan 2012.
9. 45 yo man with 5% risk Statins = $0.13 / day 10-year horizon Preliminary Results
10. 45 yo man with 5% risk Steeper “slope” (good - depends of CAC RR) Shifted to the right (bad – depends on CAC $) Medium effectiveness (depends on # treated, prev of CAC) Statins = $0.13 / day 10-year horizon Preliminary Results
11. 45 yo man with 5% risk Cost-effectiveness “frontier” (i.e., Non-dominated strategies) Statins = $0.13 / day 10-year horizon Preliminary Results
12. 45 yo man with 5% risk ICER for non-dominated strategies $152,000 $57,000 Statins = $0.13 / day 10-year horizon Preliminary Results
13. 45 yo man with 5% risk If willingness to pay <$50,000/QALY, Preferred strategy = Treat none $152,000 $57,000 Statins = $0.13 / day 10-year horizon Preliminary Results
14. 45 yo man with 15% risk Statins = $0.13 / day 10-year horizon Preliminary Results
15. 45 yo man with 10% risk Statins = $0.13 / day 10-year horizon $25,000/QALY Preliminary Results
16. 45 yo man with 7.5% risk $55,000/QALY $8,000/QALY Preliminary Results
17.
18.
19. 65 yo man with 7.5% risk $15,000/QALY $8,000/QALY $78,000/QALY Preliminary Results
20.
21.
22. 65 yo Woman with 7.5% risk $18,000/QALY $59,000/QALY Preliminary Results
34. If CAC is half as useful $24/QALY $37,000/QALY Preliminary Results
35.
36.
37.
38.
Editor's Notes
Thanks for the introduction, and thanks for inviting me here today. I’m going to pitch an idea today that I think may be somewhat controversial, but it’s a controversy worthy, at least, of debate. The question is, should we give statins to persons at low short-term cardiovascular risk?