METHODS OF ACQUIRING KNOWLEDGE IN NURSING.pptx by navdeep kaur
BodyTite(TM) Presentation
1. Deutschland - Distribution
i-CosMed Ltd & Co.KG
Schloßstrasse 14
D-82031 Grünwald
Fon: +49-(0)89-37 41 21 72
Fax: +49-(0)89-430 21 69
www.icosmed.de
featuring RFAL™ Technology
2. A new approach to minimally
invasive aesthetic surgery
Presenter:
featuring RFAL™ Technology
3. Who is Invasix?
• Privately held Israeli company - www.invasix.com
• Dedicated to minimally invasive technologies through the
development of innovative body contouring device,
– facial technology in R&D
• World wide distribution with dedicated offices in North America,
Asia Pacific and Europe
• ISO, CE approved, FDA pending
• Dedicated and growing North American service structure
• Experienced and seasoned management team with ESC, Lumenis,
Syneron and Sciton experience
featuring RFAL™ Technology
4. The Body Contouring Market
• 350,000 liposuctions performed by plastics
• Total estimated number of procedures is close
to 1,000,000 in US
• Representing 4% of all elective surgeries
featuring RFAL™ Technology
5. Why The Growth?
Obesity Trends in USA:
In 1990 not a single state had a BMI over 15%
By 2007 two-thirds of US had BMI over 25%
Statistics Courtesy Center of Disease Control
featuring RFAL™ Technology
6. Why The Growth?
In the last 40 years …
The average American man has The average American woman has
a 5 inch increase in waist size a 7 inch increase in waist size
(now 40 inches). (now 37 inches).
Statistics Courtesy American Heart Association
featuring RFAL™ Technology
7. The Growth of Liposuction
• Estimated body contouring market will double
in the next 4 years
• Significant part of growth due to Energy
Assisted Liposuction market
• Growth will be driven by liposuction
technologies perceived as being gentle, out-
patient and proven to induce contraction
featuring RFAL™ Technology
9. Available Liposuction Options:
• Traditional Liposuction
– Requires hard work
– No blood vessel coagulation
– Little to no skin tightening
• WAL (Water Assisted Liposuction)
– Less bleeding and trauma than SAL, been available 5 years
– Little or no skin tightening
• UAL (Ultrasound Assisted Liposuction)
– Good for fibrotic tissue
– Requires separate aspiration
– No blood vessel coagulation Now …. RFAL
– Little to no skin tightening
• PAL (Power Assisted Liposuction)
– Fast treatment
– Very aggressive and no blood vessel coagulation
– Little to no skin tightening
• LAL (Laser Assisted Liposuction)
– Slow treatment – requires separate aspiration
– Has tightening effect
– Blood vessel coagulation
featuring RFAL™ Technology
10. Procedure Benefits
• Speed
• Less bleeding
• Monitoring and Safety
• Thermal uniformity
An ideal
Liposuction Immediate Post-treatment Benefits
solution • Less pain
• Less swelling
should • Less bruising
address the
following: Long-term Objectives
• Uniform re-contouring
• Soft-tissue contraction & Tightening
featuring RFAL™ Technology
12. Ideal Liposuction Criteria
Economic Criteria:
1. Perform under local anesthesia
2. Side office procedure
3. Treat a variety of treatment zones/sizes
4. Speed; one stage coagulation & aspiration
featuring RFAL™ Technology
13. BodyTite System RFAL Specifications
• 75W RF output system
• Treatment depth control from 5mm to
50mm
• Real time skin temperature monitoring
• Real time power and tissue impedance
monitoring
• Tip anti-carbonization control
• Directional energy delivery
• Low weight – 10 kg
• Small footprint – 30 X 30 X 100 cm
featuring RFAL™ Technology
14. RFAL Technology
• Radio Frequency Assisted Liposuction
• Heating the skin by the RF current which flows from the
internal to the external electrode placed on the skin above
the internal electrode.
featuring RFAL™ Technology
15. Internal Electrode = Cannula
• Internal electrode is also a cannula
• For simultaneous coagulation & aspiration
• One Stage coagulation and aspiration
• Unprecedented speed, uniformity & safety
featuring RFAL™ Technology
16. BodyTite Handpiece
Controlled Depth of
Penetration
5mm extension
RF External Electrode
RF Internal Electrode
Coagulation of Adipose, Vascular and Fibrous Tissue 50mm extension
AND ASPIRATES = ONLY FAST ONE STAGE TECHNOLOGY
featuring RFAL™ Technology
22. RFAL Features & Benefits
Sophisticated Handpiece
• Treatment depth adjustment
• Directional and controlled RF
• Constant monitoring & safety feedback
control
• Simultaneous aspiration-coagulation
handpiece
• Aspiration speed greater than traditional
liposuction
featuring RFAL™ Technology
23. RFAL Features & Benefits
Speed of Treatment:
• Sample area of 5x5cm and thickness of 20mm with initial
temperature of 26oC were treated at depth of 10mm until skin
surface was heated uniformly up to 42oC. Power of 50W was
used.
• Measured treatment time was 37sec representing treatment
speed of 1.5 sec/cm2.
• Typical site 25x25cm can be treated during about 10min.
• SmartLipo MPX requires more than hour to treat identical area
• Faster at higher wattages
featuring RFAL™ Technology
24. RFAL vs SAL Aspiration Speed
RFAL SAL
Cannula Size 3.7mm aspirating 3.7mm blunt nose
cannula Mercedes cannula
Aspirated in 490 ml (23.3 ml/min) 440 ml (20.9 ml/min)
21 minutes
Conclusions:
• RFAL12% faster aspiration than SAL
• RFAL visibly less hematocrit than SAL
• RFAL has visible liquification of the
aspirated fat vs SAL more lobular fat SAL
aggregates
RFAL
featuring RFAL™ Technology
25. RFAL Features & Benefits
Skin Temperature Monitoring & Limit Control
• A sensor embedded in the handpiece provides real time surface
temperature; only device to monitor epidermal temperature
• Temperature cut-off above an adjustable target level and energy is
automatically reactivated when the hand piece/temperature falls
below the cut-off level
• This closed-loop feedback avoids overtreatment and thermal hot
spots to ensure a safe and uniform treatment.
• Allows operator to maintain
target temp at any give location
featuring RFAL™ Technology
26. RFAL Features & Benefits
Impedance Monitoring
• Contact Impedance:
– Energy cut off if one of the electrodes does not have contact
with the skin’s surface or is too close to the skin’s surface
• Anti-Carbonization Protection:
– Automatically cuts off energy during treatment if carbonization
builds on the internal electrode.
featuring RFAL™ Technology
27. RFAL Features & Benefits
Audible Feedback
• For both temperature measurements and impedance feedback
• Physicians can focus on treatment
• Audible monitors sound when approaching and then achieved
target temp
• Impedance errors (too close or too far) sound as well
featuring RFAL™ Technology
31. Uniformity of RFAL
Flir A320 Thermal Camera Flir A320 Thermal Camera
featuring RFAL™ Technology
32. Histological Study
Untreated fat.
Fat after SAL/ PAL treatment. Adipose tissue
is separated to clusters. Space between
adipocytes is filled with hemoglobin.
Fat after RFAL treatment. Channel in the fat
is observed. Fat cells are disrupted around
the channel.
featuring RFAL™ Technology
33. Histological Study
Blood vessel coagulated after RFAL treatment
Untreated collagen
Collagen after RFAL treatment
featuring RFAL™ Technology
39. RFAL Coagulative Effect
• RFAL followed by PAL faster than PAL alone
• Lower Hematocrit in Aspirate than SAL/PAL
• Higher Lipocrit in Aspirate than SAL/PAL
SA RFAL
L
featuring RFAL™ Technology
40. Adipose Tissues Coagulation
• Adipose liquefaction = gentle extraction
• Reduced extraction forces
• Less edema, less pain
SA RFAL
L
featuring RFAL™ Technology
44. RFAL Skin Contraction
Sub Dermal RFAL Contraction
+
Fibrous Septae Contraction
=
X, Y, Z Soft Tissue Contraction
featuring RFAL™ Technology
45. Pre-Abdominalplasty Patient
CONTROL
Patient was treated with three technologies, Smartlipo MPX 46W,
BodyTite 50W and BodyTite 75W
featuring RFAL™ Technology
48. Analysis of Tightening Results
Photo Courtesy: Stephen Mulholland MD
21% vertical contraction
featuring RFAL™ Technology
49. Analysis of Tightening Results
Photo Courtesy: Stephen Mulholland MD
10.3% vertical contraction
featuring RFAL™ Technology
50. Analysis of Tightening Results
Photo Courtesy: Stephen Mulholland MD
10% vertical contraction
featuring RFAL™ Technology
51. Summary of Skin Contraction
• SAL/UAL maximum linear contraction of 5% reported (11% surface
contraction)
• LAL 8% linear corresponding to 17% area contraction verified
• Initial RFAL skin contraction studies show:
• - linear 14%-40%
• - area contraction 24%-60% for high volume patient
• - depending on treated volume and energy deposited
• RFAL is about twice more effective on skin contraction than LAL
• Objective 3D Vector Analysis in progress
featuring RFAL™ Technology
52. Physician Testimonial: Skin Contraction
“For skin tightening, nothing other than BodyTite really works. With
competing systems, you may attain as much as 10% improvement in skin
tightening. But BodyTite truly causes skin contraction, if used correctly.
With BodyTite, you can actually measure skin contraction. With one
treatment, I am seeing up to 40% skin retraction.”
“Every single patient of mine has been ecstatically happy with treatment.”
--- Dr. Diane Duncan, Fort Collins CO
featuring RFAL™ Technology
53. Physician Testimonial
“I consider BodyTite the next-generation in non-excisional skin-tightening
devices – more evolutionary than revolutionary. … The ability to modulate the
skin surface temperature is better than any other system on the market.”
“This should be an easy procedure to market to patients because I feel it fills a
need. We’ll be able to achieve more skin tightening in a lipo patient with loose
skin compared to other existing modalities. These patients may no longer
require a tummy tuck. Plus, practices should be able to charge a premium for
that benefit.”
--- Dr. Jason Pozner, Boca Raton FL
featuring RFAL™ Technology
54. Physician Testimonial
This morning I saw this 35 year old 5' 4" 150 pound woman 2 weeks after her
limited abdominoplasty and RF abdominal liposuction as marked. She has no
pain and no problem healing and I feel an incredible early result not
previously achievable by any means.
-- Dr. Dennis Hurwitz, Pittsburgh PA
featuring RFAL™ Technology
55. IRB Clinical Sites
Multiple centered IRB clinical site
• Malcolm Paul, USA
• Diane Duncan, USA
• Dennis Hurwitz, USA
• Gerald Pitman, USA
• Roy Geronomous & Lori Brightman, USA
• Stephen Mulholland, Canada
• Guillermo Blugerman, Argentina
Overall results show uniformity, consistency
and safe results.
featuring RFAL™ Technology
56. Sp
Before and After Photos
featuring RFAL™ Technology
57. Massive Weight Loss: Dr. Hurwitz
Before & 6 Weeks After
Photo Courtesy: Dennis Hurwitz, MD
Absolute waist circumferential contraction of 9cm (118-109=9cm)
featuring RFAL™ Technology
58. Massive Weight Loss: Dr. Hurwitz
Before & 6 Weeks After
Photo Courtesy: Dennis Hurwitz, MD
featuring RFAL™ Technology
59. Massive Weight Loss: Dr. Hurwitz
Patient: Analysis of Tightening Results
Photo Courtesy: Dennis Hurwitz, MD
featuring RFAL™ Technology
60. Before & After
Photo Courtesy: Stephen Mulholland MD
Hips, Flanks and Abdomen Treatment
featuring RFAL™ Technology
61. Before & After
Photo Courtesy: Stephen Mulholland MD
Hips, Flanks and Abdomen Treatment
featuring RFAL™ Technology
62. Before & After
Photo Courtesy: Stephen Mulholland MD
Post Mummy Tummy – Mother of 9 and 4 year old
featuring RFAL™ Technology
63. Before & After
Photo Courtesy: Stephen Mulholland MD
Post Mummy Tummy – Mother of 9 and 4 year old
featuring RFAL™ Technology
64. Before & 3 mos After – 28F
Photo Courtesy: Guillermo Blugerman, MD
Weight 133 lbs; Cir. 83 cm Weight 122 lbs; Cir. 71 cm
featuring RFAL™ Technology
65. Before & 3mos After – 28F
Photo Courtesy: Guillermo Blugerman, MD
Weight 133 lbs; Cir. 83 cm Weight 122 lbs; Cir. 71 cm
featuring RFAL™ Technology
66. Before & After
Photo Courtesy: Dennis Hurwitz, MD
featuring RFAL™ Technology
67. Before & After
Photo Courtesy: Dennis Hurwitz, MD
featuring RFAL™ Technology
68. Before & 3mos After – 32F
Photo Courtesy: Guillermo Blugerman, MD
Weight 136 lbs; Cir. 91 cm Weight 129 lbs; Cir. 78 cm
featuring RFAL™ Technology
69. Before & 3mos After – 32F
Photo Courtesy: Guillermo Blugerman, MD
Weight 136 lbs; Cir. 91 cm Weight 129 lbs; Cir. 78 cm
featuring RFAL™ Technology
70. Before & 3mos After – 20M
Photo Courtesy: Guillermo Blugerman, MD
Weight 178 lbs ; Cir. 105 cm Weight 172 lbs; Cir. 100 cm
featuring RFAL™ Technology
71. Before & 3mos After – 20M
Photo Courtesy: Guillermo Blugerman, MD
Weight 178 lbs ; Cir. 105 cm Weight 172 lbs; Cir. 100 cm
featuring RFAL™ Technology
72. Before & After – 58F
Photo Courtesy: Stephen Mulholland MD
Inner & Outer Thigh, Hips & Abdomen Treatment with Cellulite Reduction
featuring RFAL™ Technology
73. Before & After – 34F
Photo Courtesy: Stephen Mulholland MD
Inner & Outer Thigh, Bra Line, Hips, Buttocks & Abdomen Treatment
featuring RFAL™ Technology
74. Before & After – 34F
Photo Courtesy: Stephen Mulholland MD
Inner & Outer Thigh, Bra Line, Hips, Buttocks & Abdomen Treatment
featuring RFAL™ Technology
75. Before & After
Photo Courtesy: Stephen Mulholland MD
Abdomen Treatment
featuring RFAL™ Technology
76. Before & After
Photo Courtesy: Stephen Mulholland MD
Abdomen Treatment
featuring RFAL™ Technology
77. Before & 6 Weeks After
Arm treatment showing significant skin contraction.
Photo Courtesy: Guillermo Blugerman, MD
featuring RFAL™ Technology
78. Before & 6W After – 57F
Photo Courtesy: Stephen Mulholland MD
Inner & Outer Thigh Treatment with Cellulite Reduction
featuring RFAL™ Technology
79. Before & After
Photo Courtesy: Stephen Mulholland MD
Flank and Back Treatment
featuring RFAL™ Technology
80. Before & After
Photo Courtesy: Stephen Mulholland MD
Abdomen Treatment
featuring RFAL™ Technology
81. Before & After
Photo Courtesy: Dennis Hurwitz, MD
featuring RFAL™ Technology
82. Before & After
Photo Courtesy: Dennis Hurwitz, MD
featuring RFAL™ Technology
83. Before & 7 Weeks After
Photo Courtesy: Dennis Hurwitz, MD
featuring RFAL™ Technology
84. Before & 7 Weeks After
Photo Courtesy: Dennis Hurwitz, MD
featuring RFAL™ Technology
85. Before & 3mos After
Photo Courtesy: Malcolm Paul, MD
Abdomen Treatment
featuring RFAL™ Technology
86. Before & After
Photo Courtesy: Malcolm Paul, MD
Back and Abdomen Treatment
featuring RFAL™ Technology
87. Before & 3mos After – 52F
Photo Courtesy: Guillermo Blugerman, MD
Weight 139 lbs; Cir. 90 cm Weight 128 lbs; Cir. 85 cm
featuring RFAL™ Technology
88. Before & After
Photo Courtesy: Guillermo Blugerman, MD
featuring RFAL™ Technology
89. Patient Testimonial
“My results are amazing! BodyTite has totally re-contoured my figure and
changed my body type completely. It feels like my skin has tightened and
formed back to my body and I can see I don’t have saggy skin or rolls
anymore. Three years after having my baby, I feel like I have a new body
image and my shape back.”
“I was treated a month ago and already I feel more active and lighter, with a
much better figure. I am a new person with a totally new shape and outlook
about my body image.”
“During and after my treatment I never felt any pain. I would describe it as a
general soreness, but not painful at all.”
L.M., 24 years
Areas Treated: Hips, flanks, bra line (wants abdomen next)
Profile: Single mother of 3 year old child
featuring RFAL™ Technology
90. Marketing
• Liposuction is a big market ($341,144 procedures performed by
ASAPS members in 2008)
• Consumers are losing interest in traditional liposuction (down 25%
since 2007) in the same time, Energy Assisted Liposuction market is
booming and overall body contouring market is growing
• Consumes are demanding
- skin contraction
- less bruising, pain, etc
- out-patient
• To maintain practice growth physicians need to incorporate Energy
Assisted Liposuction
Statistics courtesy ASAPS
featuring RFAL™ Technology
91. Marketing Materials
Patient Education Direct Mail
Brochure Postcard
And More:
•Patient Education Flip Book
•Advertising Templates
•Table Top Display
•Posters
•Consumer Website
featuring RFAL™ Technology
92. BodyTite ROI Benefits:
• Increased market demand
• Adds new patients in your practice interested in a gentle, less
downtime procedure
• New patients who are not ready for excisional procedures but
interested in RFAL contraction
• Treat multiple zones achieving coagulation and contraction faster
than SAL , UAL, LAL
• Safest most reliable way of achieving thermal treatment
• More patient candidates (high BMI, loose skin, previous
liposuction)
• Side-office and local anesthesia to reduce overhead
• between $1500-$4000 facility/staffing in cost savings
featuring RFAL™ Technology
93. BodyTite Competitive Advantages
Ergonomic design Fully Controlled Procedure
• Small foot print • Skin temperature monitoring
• Light weight • Anti-carbonization
• Simple use monitoring
• Intuitive interface • Controlled penetration depth
Most advanced technology • Skin contact monitoring
• Higher power • Output power monitoring
• Faster treatment • Skin impedance monitoring
• Single Stage
• Uniform heating
• Directional heating
• Lipolysis/Tightening/Coagulatio
n
• BEST in class Skin Contraction
featuring RFAL™ Technology